Upcoming election in Indiaevokes surprise, doubt,say Indian experts here board rates riseBy MORT FOXIndian students and South Asiascholars here were surprised andskeptical about Indian PrimeMinister Indira Gandhi’s recentmoves to restore democracy tothat country, an abandonment ofa two-year old state ofemergency and suppression ofcivil rights.“We are more hopeful thanbefore, but we are pessimistic ofthe possibility of fair elections,”said sociology graduate studentAnand Kumar, an Indian whoseIndian government grant wascancelled last spring because ofhis frequent criticism of Gandhi’semergency measures.“I would describe the reactionof the people I’ve talked to as oneof relief. It’s good news,” addedKumar.Kumar wonders whether theMarch 16 Parliamentary elec¬tions, will prove to be anythingother than an official sanctioningof the “state of emergency”Gandhi instituted June 26,1975.“Our greatest fears are thatthere is still no guarantee of amediator. She’s not accountableto anyone. Even people withproperty don’t know if they’regoing to lose their property next.She’s too powerful, too ar¬bitrary,” explained Kumar.India’s Congressional party,headed by Gandhi, controlsroughly two-thirds of the seats inIndia’s Parliament and has not lost an election since the countrywon independence from GreatBritain in 1947.“There’s no doubt she would bedefeated if there were enoughtime—if all political prisonerswere released. But this is notlikely,” added Kumar.Professor of political scienceLloyd Rudolph, on sabatical inIndia last year, said oppositionparties in India, clusteringaround popular public officialsMorarji R. Desai and JayNarayan, have not faired wellsince 1967. The reason, he said, isthat people may disagree withGandhi’s heavy-handed gover¬ning, but not with her diagnosis ofthe country’s situation.“The opposition did well inanti-Congressism then and wonsome state governments. Butsince then, they’ve knocked eachother out as Gandhi has pursueda centrist path,” Rudolph said.He said Gandhi put an end tothe ‘dual economy—the “blackmoney” and speculation that wasartifically keeping prices high.Last year India was the onlynation to have a negative rate ofinflation.Rudolph pointed out, “Whilethe emergency measures havereinforced a decline of prices, sheclaims to have caused it.”Rudolph said to watch for thevoter turnout in the election andthe margin that Gandhi wins. Bed andBy STEVE BLOCKRoom and board rates areexpected to rise by an average often percent next year.Basic room rates for doublerooms in single student housingwill increase by $80 on theaverage, and board rates will beboosted by nearly $100. Althoughthe rates have not been officiallyannounced, Edward Turkington,director of student housing, saidthe increases are inevitable.The proposed rates await theapproval of the Board ofTrustees, expected “in the nearfuture,” according to Turkington.Hutchinson Commons mealticket requirements, for dor¬mitories without dining halls, willprobably rise from $150 to $160per year.Rentals for married studentresidences, which are managedby the University realty service,have not yet been set, althoughincreases there are expected toparallel the single studenthousing hikes.Energy costs, which werereportedly responsible for 50percent of next year’s $300 tuitionhike, constitute a significantportion of next year’s room andboard charges, Turkington said.“We’ve just been killed byheating costs. While it’s only aprojection, the plant departmentforesees costs up by 40 percentover last year. That alone is a$60,000 item,” he said.An increase in the number ofstudents with board contracts hasreduced the food service’s dificitfrom $73,000 last year to under$50,000 for the current year. “The room and board deficitsare made up by the University’sgeneral fund. We can’t allow theUniversity subsidy to growagain.” However, cafeteriaemployees negotiate a newcontract in April and. saidTurkington, “there’s no tellingwhat that will cost us.”The housing system deficit, isexpected to exceed $300,000 bythe end of the 1977 fiscal year, atleast $90,000 above originalestimates.Other private universities haverecently announced room andboard increases comparable toChicago, citing the high price of energy', labor costs, and othermonetary woes currentlyplaguing private universities asreasons for the increases.The University has triedalternatives to raising boardcosts in order to alleviate thedeficit. Two years ago, one dininghall in each of three major un¬dergraduate dormitories wasclosed each quarter to cut costsThe budget was balanced thatyear but Turkington decided thatthere were too many hardshipsassociated with closing one of thehalls and forcing residents tocross the campus in order to gettheir meals.Room and board rates in the University’s dormitory system are ex¬pected to rise by $180 next year. (photo by Dan Newman)Future affiliation expectedFaculty Senate Council votes on pact with ReeseBy STEVE COHODESThe Council of theUniversity Senate is expectedto vote today on the proposedaffiliation between the Prit-zker School of Medicine, andMiahael Reese Hospital,located at 27th street on thesouthside. The medical staffat Reese met yesterday toconsider affiliation.The new agreement wouldbe more a change of degreethan of substance. A limitedagreement between the twohospitals has been in effectsince 1969 on a department bydepartment basis, with Reesestaff teaching here and havingseparate faculty status. Thenew' arrangement places therelationship of the hospitals ona firmer basis, offering toeach the resources of theother.One source in the biologicalsciences division said thatmost members of thedivisional faculty supportedaffiliation and had approved itearlier last month.Dr. Martin Swerdlow, vicepresident for academic affairsat Michael Reese, said therehas been no overt opposition atReese but some anxiety aboutpossible changes. According to Reese of¬ficials, the University standsto gain “up to 22 teachers”paid by Reese, stationed thereand subject to usual facultyregulations.Reese would benefitbecause the affiliation wouldassure Reese of eligibility forfederal grants, according toDr. Earl Silber, president ofthe medical staff there.Although Reese is a teaching institution, conducting bothresearch and residencyprograms, the lack of amedical school might hurtReese in vying for agencyfunding and lessen itsreputation as a majorteaching institution.Some members of thefaculty here oppose the af¬filiation because they considerthe biological sciencedivisions share of the University budget alreadydisproportionate. Based onfigures from November of lastyear, the division controlledover 30 percent of the budget.Others feel that a closerrelationship with Reese willresult in less autonomy forPritzker. already heavily-regulated by federal agenciesThe federal governmentnow requires cooperationamong hospitals to eliminateduplication of expensivemedical equipment and areasof specialization. Beforemajor investments inequipment building, a hospitalmust obtain a “certificate ofneed” from a designatedagency.Pritzker and Reese willremain distinct institutions,with separate corporationsand separate boards, but willhave joint residencyprograms and will continuejoint research programs.Swerdlow said that the basicproblems of affiliation wouldbe “people problems” —problems of people workingtogether and of “turf-guardinginstincts.”The University has hadsimilar affiliation agreementsbefore, including ones with La Rabida Children's Hospitaland the Argonne NationalLaboratory.Former Pritzker DeanDaniel C. Tosteson. whoresigned last fall amid a furorthat ultimately led to histermination by the University-administration. had beenheavily involved in themodifications of the currentReese agreement. Tostesonleft for Harvard MedicalSchool, where he will becomedean next July.Harvard, like most other [major medical schools, has jaffiliation agreements with !local hospitals Harvardconducts all its teaching andmedical programs by af¬filiation with existinghospitals, since it has nohospital of its ownSwerdlow views theproposed affiliation betweenhis hospital and the Universityas something “important andhopeful.” He added that af- jfiliation would increase theability to meet health careneeds of the University andthe south side“The object is a com¬plementary role,” he said“We each are adding strength,making up for any deficits ineach other.”fil Michael ReeseHealth PlanandMedical Group3055 S. COTTAGE GROVE AVE.A proposed affiliation between the Pritzker School of Medicine andMichael Reese will add up to 200 faculty to the University’s medicalprograms, (photo by Dan Newman)CalendarTuesdayPre-Law: Meeting, 3 pm. Harper 130.a poetry magazine (w/art): Staff meeting,mandatory, scheduling of sales will be done,7:30 pm, rm 217 Ida Noyes Hall.Calvert Houae: Learning to Pray Group.8pm, Calvert House.Christian Science Organization: 5pm, EastLounge. Ida Noyes.Ki-Aikido: 6:15pm, wrestling mat, BartlettGym.SG: 7:30 pm, Ida Noyes.Microbiology Club: “Scanning ElectronMicroscopy as a Tool in Microbiology,”Gerald Byrne, 12 noon, EBB 117.Training Program in Genetics andRegulation and Department ofBiochemistry: “The E. coli lac repressormRNA: Nucleotide Sequences at translationInitiation Sites,” Deborah A. Steege,2:30pm, Cummings 101.Department of Mathematics: What and Whyis Mathematics: “Symbols and Sym¬bolism,” Felix E. Browder. 11:30am,Eckhart 133.ArtsIllinois Chamber Orchestra: Melvin War¬ner, clarinet, 8:30pm, Mandel Hall. DOC: “An American Romance.” 7:15pm;“Ruby Gentry,” 9:15pm, Cobb.Performunce/Midway: “My Last Per¬formance,” 2pm; “Warehouse: Schema,"Michael Crane, 8pm, Midway Studios*.Focus: Second part of a discussion onSouthern Africa moderated by ThomasHughes, President of the Carnegie En¬dowment lor International Peace. 9pm, WH-PK.Context: Re-broadcast of Saturday’s show,with host Jim Ruddle and UC facultydiscussing the week’s news, 9:30pm, WH-PK.WednesdaySailing Club: Racing team meeting, 9pm,Sun Parlor, Ida Noyes. All new membersand new racers welcome.UFO: Discussion on “The Female Role,”7:30pm, 3rd floor. Blue Gargoyle.Hillel: Students for Israel, “Franco, TheJews and World War II,” Dr. BarbaraHilson Abramowitz, 12noon, Hillel House.Crossroads: Conversational English forforeign women, 2-3pm, Crossroads StudentCenter, 5621 S. Blackstone Ave.University Bridge Club: Qualifying forIntercollegiate Bridge Championships, 7pm,Ida Noyes.Christian Fellowship: 7:15pm, East Lounge,Ida Noyes.Country Dancers 8-10pm. Ida Noyes.Southeast Asia Seminar: “Early PrehistoricExplorations in Java,” a discussion withGert-Jan Bartstra. and Ben Bronson, 4pm, Foster Lounge.Department of Behavioral Sciences:“Algorithms for Induction,” L. Huesmann,4pm, Beecher 102.Econometrics and Statistics Colloquium:“Methods for Constructing PriorDistributions,” 3:30 pm, Rosenwald Hall 11.Parents Association of the LaboratorySchools: “Intellectural Development inEarly Childhood,” Janellen Huttenlocher,8pm, Judd Hall 126.Department of Biochemistry: “MembraneGlycoproteins and RecognitionPhenomena,” G. Gilbert Ashwell, 4pm,Cummings 151.Liberal Education and the ModernUniversity: “Liberal Education: TheEthical Problem,” 4:30pm, Harper 130.ArtsRockefeller Chapel: Robert Lodine,University Carillonneur, in recital 12:15pm,Rockefeller Chapel.Noontimers: Gilbert and Sullivan Revue,12noon, Reynolds Club.DOC: “Ruggles of Red Gap,” 7:30pm; “TheTalk of the Town,” 9pm, Cobb.Chicago Independent Filmmakers Series:Films from the School of the Art Institute,7:30pm, Kent 107.Political Forum: Michael Hoff will in¬terview representatives from the NewAmerican Movement (NAM), Jeff Gouldand John Cameron, 9pm.ThursdayOrganization of Black Students: General meeting, 7:30pm, Ida Noyes Library.Hillel: Hebrew Folk Song Workshop, 7pm;Faculty Lunch, “Jewish Studies inAmerican Universities,” Prof. HaroldWechsler, 12noon, Hillel.Change Ringing: Handbells, location an¬nounced at Mon & Sat meetings, 12noon-lpm.Debate Society: Instruction, 7pm, Meeting,8pm, Ida Noyes Hall.Ki*Aikido: 6:15pm, Bartlett Gym.Judo: 6pm, Bartlett Gym.Table Tennis: 7:30pm, 3rd floor, Ida Noyes.LAW: “Winning Isn’t Everything: TheProblem of Enforceable Remedies," LindaR. Hirshman, 8pm, Rosary College, 7900 W.Division St., River Forest.Indoor Gardening Lecture: “Growing Cacti& Succulents,” Susan Yamins, director ofUC Biology Greenhouse, 7:30pm-9pm,meeting room in the Hyde Park CoopSupermarket.ArtsLaw School Film Society: “Dead of Night,”& W. C. Fields' short, 8:30pm, Law SchoolAuditorium.International House Films: “Lady Sings theBlues,” 7:00 & 9:45pm, International House.CEF: “The Last Laugh,” 8pm, Cobb.President Wilson’s Press Conference: Lastweek’s question and answer session with theMaroon and WHPK recorded on tape, 9pm,WHPK.The University of ChicagoCourt TheatrePresentsAN EVENING of ONE-ACTSTRIFLESby Susan GlaspellTHIS PROPERTY IS CONDEMNEDANDAUTO- DA- FE’By Tennessee WilliamsADMISSION$2.00/$1.50THENEW THEATRE5706 S. UNIVERSITYFor ReservationsCall753-3581 8:30 P.M.FEB.11-12-13918-19-20SAGER-S0L0M0N SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOLA PresentsSAT. FEB. 19-8:30 P.M.CIVIC OPERA HOUSEPRICES: Main FI. $25, $15: 1st Bale. $15. $12.50: 2nd Bale.$5, $3. Send check or money order with stamped, self-ad¬dressed envelope to: SAGER-SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAYSCHOOL, Attention Mr. Alan John, 8310 N. Harding Ave ,Skolie. III. 60076.FOR INFORMATION CALL 679- 6653 There IS a difference!!!PREPARE FOR:GMAT • GRE • OGATCPAT • VAT • SATOur broad range of programs provides an umbrella of test¬ing know-how that enables us to otter the best preparationavailable, no matter which course is taken Over 38 yearsof experience and success Small classes Voluminoushome study materials Courses that are constantly up¬dated Permanent centers open days & weekends ali yearComplete tape facilities for review of class lessons and foruse of supplementary materials Make-ups for missed les¬sons at our centersASK ABOUT OURCOMPACT COURSES2050 W. DevonChicago, III. 60645(312) 764 5151Outside NY State OnlyCALL TOLL FREE800-221-9840 EDUCATIONAL centerT( $T PPf PAR A TtONSPECIALISTS SiNC l ‘<4 inCenters m Major U S Cities iir STUDENTS FOR ISRAELWEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9th, 12:00 Noon, Hillel House5715 Woodlawn AvenueSPEAKER:DR. BARBARA HILSON ABRAMOWITZ, PhD., Johns!Hopkins 1970, Taught at Harvard and Georgetown Univer-Isities Lectured at American and Catholic Universities in jWashington D.C. Currently doing research and writing on!Spain and the Jews. ISUBJECT:FRANCO, THE JEWS AND WORLD WAR II ]Bring a Bag Lunch-Drink Provided IPASTSPEEDYRAPID■SWIFTPRONTO ^ttt miss iistot mnm m.PRINTING.IF YOU NEED IT FAST WE’RE AS NEAP AS YOUR PHONE.OUR SERVICES INCLUDE•Copying •Business Cards ‘Xerox Copl**•Folding •Meiller* .Copying*'•Collating »Flyers Ouplicetlng-Feet•Binding .Ad Book. I Call 684-7070•Wedding invitations .Church Bulletin* I v«U UW fVfV•Padding Etc •Thesis - Term Papers• Envelopes •Funeral ProgramsLetterheads ^aiiiv ' Hyda Park Bank Bldg.QUIA 1525 East 53rd StreetCROSS Chicago, III. 60615INSTANT PRINTING WHILE U WAIT Suite 626 SURVIVORS OF THE HOLOCAUST:AN ORAL HISTORY PROJECTPROF ARTHUR MANNPRESTON & STERLING MORTON PROF.DEPT. OF HISTORYFEB. 11 FRIDAY8:30 PMNAT HILLEL5715 WOODLAWNHAVE A"HEART!Send her theFTDLoveBundleBouquet forValentinesWeekend.Reach out andtouch her with thisFTD I.oveBundle''Bouquet YourFTD Florist cansend one almostanywhere by wire theFTD way Order early (Most FTDFlorists accept major credit cards ) Usually available C*for less than ^As an independent businessman, eachFTD Member Florist sets his own pricesSay FTD.. .and be sure.Cr 1*777 Flonstf rr.tnvworM Delivery2 The Chicago Maroon Tuesday, February 8, 1977TlSTfRMMmQNfMDid you get your Jfeur jjark Sinusthis Sunday morning?Only $1.50Starting Feb. 20th you can have the Sunday New York Timesdelivered to your door. You’ll never miss it again just call:368-4390and ask for the Sunday Morning News ServiceFOR GUARANTEED HOME DELIVERYWk'G'^--41 WELCHADE1 GRAPE DRINK1 40 oz. can2.89*f JOAN OF ARCASSORTED CANNEDVEGATABLESNo. 303 size can4.$r° MORTON FROZEN iDONUTS5 Varieties59‘ :■r »f1 DANN0NYOGURT8 oz. cartons1 ... Jl°° FRESHSPARE RIBS98*... iUSDA CHOICE SHOULDER £LAMB CHOPS F99*ROUND BONE$109 E4 Sale Dates: Wed. Feb. 9 thru Feb. 161 1226 E. 53rd L/f (KIMBARK PLAZA) rJ HOURS: MON. - SAT. 0:30 A.M. - \I 7:50 PJW.4 ' SUN. 9-4:50 JP ALLTOGETHERAt One LocationTO SAVE YOU MOREfWMBItClIVNUT VOLKSWAGEN .SPECIAL DISCOUNT PRICESFor ALL STUDENTSAND FACULTY MEMBERSJust present your University ofChicago Identification Card.As Students or Faculty Members ofthe University of Chicago you are en¬titled to SDecial money savingsDiscounts on /oik*, we gen & ChevroletParts, accessories and any new orused Volkswagen or Chevrolet youbuy from Volkswagen South Shore orMerit Chevrolet Inc.1310KA3ID * NESVMSmOA U10KA3N)SALES & SERVICEALL AT ONE OREAT LOCATION Lew Scnooi Aomissim Test&ftuuiTf MmifMErr Aim TestGiMOUfTf RiCORO EllttliriOlMidiul Collin Aon Tir• PROFFMIOBAl INSTRUCTORS• CURRENT MATERIAL!• AOMISSKM / APPLICATIONSTRATI6Y• LOWEST HOURLY COSTOF ANY PROSHA M782-2185) S l»MMERITCHEVROLET r©VOLKSWAGENSOUTH SHORE7234 Stony Island_ PfoiM: 684-0400Op on Dally 9-9 PM. / Sat. 9-3 PM.Parts Open Saturday too till 2 Nooi•A6CN •CHEVROin WHPK88.3 FM79mm79moO79QU)THOUSANDS OFDOLLARS WORTHFEBRUARY 7 13DURING ROCK, JAZZ,R 8. B. AND COUNTRYSHOWS.WHPK 88.3 FMTony Bird.A strong voice from achanging continent.Tony Bird was born in Malawi, SoutheastAfrica/!..where the long grass cries and the lion roarsand the law breeds men of bitter hate.’The son ofcolonial parents, he is attached to a land which heknows is not rightfully his.His songs reflect his feelings for this land and itspeople. Some are songs of protest that cry out againstthe inhumanity of a society that is based on racism andisubjugation. Others tell of the luminous green of theveldt and of the inland seas.To all his music he bringsan understanding of the African attitude of whatmusic is.‘Tony Bird.’His first album.The long grass sings again.On Columbia Recordsand Tapes.Available A/ow at Hear Here Records2833 N. Broadway, Chicago4016 Vi Cicero, Chicago609 Demster, EvanstonThe Chicago Maroon Tuesday, February 8, 1977 3Mr. Levi goes to WashingtonBy STEVE BROWNTwo years ago today Edward H. Levianswered Gerald Ford’s call to duty andwent to Washington to become the nation’schief law enforcement officer.Ford’s appointment of Levi, one of theonly non-political Attorney Generals in thehistory of the office, put Levi in a positionto restore the integrity of a JusticeDepartment that had been severely un¬dermined in the years of the Watergatescandal.The move to Washington was one of thefew times in Levi’s life that he was outsideof walking distance from the quadrangles.His career at the University started at thelab school and reached a peak with hiselection as president of the University in1968.Levi was not, however, a completestranger to the Washington scene. From1940 to 1945, while on leave from the lawschool, Levi served as special assistant tothe Attorney General and in later years asa special consultant to various govern¬ment commissions.Yet when Levi was appointed AttorneyGeneral, just seven months after theresignation of Richard Nixon, he was very-much an unknown quantity. That, manythought, was his major qualification.Here was a man who could restorestability to the Justice Depart¬ment, which had been headed byfour different men in the previousthree years.President Ford’s nomination of Levi asAttorney General in the winter of 1975 waswidely acclaimed. Apart from some jittersamong some conservative senators, likeMississippi’s cigar-chomping JamesEastland (who feared that Levi’s pastassociation with organizations such as theNational Lawyers Guild — as well as hiscloistered life at a college campus madehim suspect as a left-winger), Levi’snomination sailed through both houses ofCongress. Levi was described by thenation’s media and knowledgeable ob¬servers as “non-partisan,’’“professional,” “articulate.” “a man ofintegrity,” and a “scholar.” Here was aman who could restore stability to theJustice Department, which had beenheaded by four different men in theprevious three years.At the same time. Levi was enigmatic.Experts wondered whether a life longacademian could adjust to a position whichrequired a wide array of decisions af¬fecting a diverse modem society. Othershad difficulty pegging Levi’s politicalideology — and Levi’s comment during hisconfirmation hearings that he wasn’t surewhether he was a Republican or aDemocrat didn’t make the task any easier.Now, two years later, a new ad¬ministration has taken over inWashington. And, after considerabledebate and controversy, Griffin Bell hasbeen approved as the nation’s 72nd At¬torney General. Illinois’ Senator CharlesPercy voted against confirming Bell,arguing on the Senate floor that thiscountry could ill afford to retreat from thenonpartisan independence exhibited byEdward Levi. This “nonpartisan in¬dependence” is regarded by many as thegreatest accomplishment of his ad¬ministration. The reasons for this commonevaluation can begin to be found in areview of the Levi record.The former President of the Universityof Chicago took over the administration ofthe Department of Justice at a troubledtime. His immediate predecessor, formerOhio senator William Saxbe, had beendefiantly outspoken but short on tact.Saxbe had succeeded Elliot Richardson,whose brief tenure at Justice ended in thefamous “Saturday Night Massacre.”Richardson had taken over the job fromRichard Kliendienst of ITT scandal fame,who had followed the most notorious At¬torney General of them all, John Mitchell.Faced with this recent history, Levi spentmuch of his time in office dealing in twothorny areas: the FBI and Watergate. Athird major problem area confronting the Attorney General was civil rights en¬forcement and its controversial bedfellow,forced school busing. Finally, the AttorneyGeneral, as the nation’s top lawman, hadto concern himself with a variety of issuesrelated to crime. Levi’s treatment of theseproblems reveals his unorthodoxoperating style.TheF.B.I.Levi spent more time dealing with theFBI than any other problem. The FederalBureau of Investigation, under thedirectorship of Clarence Kelley since late1973, was still entangled in thebureaucratic web spun by the late J.Edgar Hoover. Levi worked steadily topurge the FBI of abuses of power whileinstilling a healthy respect for civilliberties among the department’smembers. In general, Levi is praised forhis work with the FBI. David Goldberger,executive director of the Illinois chapter ofthe American Civil Liberties Union(ACLU), said that Levi did a “crediblejob’’ in cleaning up the FBI, despite theACLU’s many differences with Levi overthe use of wiretapping.Almost by necessity, wiretapping andintelligence surveillance were the firstissues Levi was forced to confront with theFBI. In a discussion with The WashingtonPost last November, Levi mused that hehad barely got behind his desk in his newJustice Department office following hisswearing in when “an FBI agent appearedat my door without announcement” andrequested that Levi sign a request for awarrantless “national security” wiretap.Levi was surprised that his signature wasexpected so automatically, particularlysince the CIA. not the FBI, is supposed tobe involved in national security sur¬veillance. The FBI is required to get courtwarrants for its domestic eavesdroppingactivities. Partly as a result of this in¬cident, Levi set up a special group toreview all such wiretap request beforethey reached his desk.According to close associates, Levi didnot sign a single surveillance order duringhxs 23 months in office. He also imposedtougher guidelines for the control of allintelligence activities. He helped sponsorthe Kennedy-Hruska “Foreign In¬telligence Wiretap Legislation” whichaimed to bring national security wiretapsunder law for the first time in the nation’shistory. Complaints were made that thenew guidelines and suggested legislationfor controlling FBI eavesdropping werenot strict enough. The ACLU charged thatthe proposed bill contained loopholeswhich might allow the FBI to continueunjustifiable wiretapping.Besides wiretapping, Levi loosened theveil of secrecy shrouding other FBI sur¬veillance activities. Early in his term heordered the return of the famous “Pum¬pkin Papers Case” documents to AlgerHiss and compelled the FBI to give to theRosenburg sons papers used in thenotorious 1953 spy case against theirparents. Levi also uncovered some of J.Edgar Hoover’s personal dossiers onleading political figures. Levi stated thatthe release of this previously suppressedinformation was important if his goal ofde-politicizing the Justice Departmentwere to be achieved.Levi also issued stiffer orders relating totwo other traditional FBI practices:“preventative-action plans,” which in¬cluded the use of extra-legal steps of in¬timidation and threats of violence to stifleconceivably subversive activities, andprobes of “dangerous’’ politicalorganizations like the Socialist WorkersParty. In addition, new rules were drawnup requiring the FBI to investigategovernment leaks of classified in¬formation only at the express request ofthe Attorney General. Justice Departmentspokesmen said that such requests wouldbe issued only when there was “probablecause that a Federal law has beenviolated” — a very rare occurrence.Finally, Levi made it known that, as far ashe was concerned, a President has no rightto order an assassination — despite thecontrary opinions of top CIA brass.Corruption within the FBI was aprimary matter of dispute during Levi’stwo years in office. Levi refused to acceptthe FBI’s in-house report on corruption in early 1976. Apparently, the probe intocertain allegations which implicatedformer FBI assistant director John D.Mohr was suffocated by senior officialsseeking to protect both Mohr and them¬selves. Levi ordered a new inquiry, whichwould be overseen by the JusticeDepartment. According to TimeMagazine, the demand for a second in¬vestigation “represented a deliberate andunprecedented decision to strip his(Levi’s) top deputies of their authorityover the case,” which shook up the Bureauconsiderably. Defenders of the FBIcharged Levi with destroying the FBIunder the guise of cleaning it up.Throughout these difficulties, Leviremained firm in his steadfast support ofDirector Kelley. In a highly criticizedmove in September 1976, Levi defendedKelley from charges that he had im¬properly accepted gifts from subordinates.The Washington Post reported that aspecial message from I^evi to PresidentFord praised Kelley and labeled thecharges as trivial, but did not deny theirvalidity. The report, said the Post, wasdesigned to give Ford a free hand inKelley’s future, with the “presumption”being that he should be retained. Onemonth later, in what would be considered aturnabout, Levi ordered Kelley off a planebound for Albuquerque and advised him totone down a speech he was about to make.Kelley subsequently deleted a number ofremarks from his prepared text which hadcriticized unnamed members of the press.The Levi-Kelley working relationship,which Levi claimed was smooth, obviouslyhad its rough spots.WatergateThe Watergate scandal had not beenlong over when Levi arrived at the JusticeDepartment. Heightened -publicawareness was bound to focus intensemedia scrutiny on any new Watergate-related issues. As a non-politician, Leviwas in many ways the ideal bureaucrat ofthe post-Watergate era. The mere fact thathe was enthroned in the Departmenthelped remove the onus of scandal fromthe Attorney Generalship. Nevertheless,two circumstances in 1976 entangled Leviin Watergate related affairs: the maturingof Congressional efforts to pass aWatergate reform bill, and the allegationsthat President Ford may have engaged inimproper behavior while he was aCongressman.The Watergate Reform Act of 1976 wasoriginally introduced by Senator SamErvin in 1974. Its major provisions in¬cluded a special triggering device whichwould create a temporary specialprosecutor in the Justice Department inthe event of government improprieties, theestablishment of an office of GovernmentCrimes in the Justice Department to in¬vestigate alleged violations of campaignand election laws, and the creation of anew Congressional legal counsel. By thesummer of 1976, the GovernmentOperations Committee had approved theBill and was prepared to introduce it on theSenate floor.Attorney General Levi was not pleasedwith the Bill. He was apparently mostconcerned with Title I, which containedthe provisions relating to the temporaryspecial prosecutors. According toassociates, Levi thought that themechanism for automatically appointing atemporary prosecutor, based as it was onthe recommendation of a non-partisanpanel of former members of the Judiciary,raised serious constitutional questionsinvolving the separation of powers.Another worry was that each new set ofallegations would beget a new specialprosecutor, creating a situation wherethere would be as many as four or fiveserving at the same time. A number ofmedia reports also speculated that Levi’sreal problem was that he felt personallyaffronted by the legislation, considering itan insult to the integrity of his Depart¬ment.Levi’s adamant opposition was mostnewsworthy because it came to the surfacelate in the discussion, in the last monthbefore the Bill’s passage. It put the FordAdministration in the difficult position ofopposing a Watergate reform in an elec¬tion year. According to columnists, the sources of Levi’s “folly” were his defiantobliviousness to politics, along with thelack of central control and direction overthe Cabinet from the Ford White House.Despite the legitimacy of Levi’s con¬cerns, Government Operations Committeemembers and staff could not help beingdispleased by his 11th hour lobbying ef¬forts to forestall passage of the Bill. Therewas widespread feeling in the Committeethat Levi’s Congressional Liaison Officehad misjudged the seriousness of the Billand poorly advised Levi as to its likelihoodof passage. Lower-level Justice Depart¬ment officials did testify and lobby againstthe Bill, but the “big guns” virtuallyignored it during its two year gestationperiod. When the Bill was finally referredto the whole Committee for a final vote, theAttorney General was caught flat-footed.The bill, which had vigorous bipartisansupport, was passed by the Committeeunanimously and was scheduled to reachthe Senate floor on July 20.On July 19 a new compromise bill ap¬peared from the Executive Branch. Thenew bill contained some changes, mostsignificantly the substitution of a singlepermanent special prosecutor for thedevice set up to appoint temporary ones.No one is really sure where the com¬promise Bill originated — the JusticeDepartment or the White House. Whetherthe acceptance of the Bill, with changes,was a capitulation by Levi to Ford or theSenate, or whether the compromiselegislation was a deft move by Levi tomake the best out of a bad situation maynever be clear. As it was, the Committeehurriedly agreed to the compromise billbehind closed doors and the Senate ap¬proved it by a 91-5 vote on July 21. It wasthen referred to the House of Represen¬tatives where Levi, along with Committeemembers Ribicoff, Percy, and Javits,testified in favor of its passage.Most people were relatively pleased withthe compromise, though several liberaljournals like The Boston Globe and TheWashington Post expressed their op¬position to the permanent specialprosecutor. A number of Senators who hadspent long hours on the original Bill were abit annoyed at the Attorney General.Ironically, the Bill never made it to thefloor of the House.Levi’s second major entanglement witha Watergate issue directly involvedPresident Ford. As in the previous case, itwas rumored that White House aides werefrantic that Levi’s complete detachmentfrom political concerns would damageFord’s reputation with the voters.According to close associates,Levi did not sign a single sur¬veillance order during his 23months in office. He also imposedtougher guidelines for the controlof all intelligence activites.Midway through the fall campaign, itwas learned that Watergate SpecialProsecutor Charles Ruff was investigatingallegations that President Ford hadmisused campaign contributions in anearlier Congressional election. ProminentRepublicans, including Presidentialrunning-mate Robert Dole, attacked theinvestigation as an attempt by Ruff whowas a Democrat, to embarrass thePresident. But White House supporterswere left in an embarrassing positionthemselves when it was revealed thatAttorney General Levi had instructed Ruffin July to probe into the allegations.Reports were that Levi had acted on in¬formation received from an FBI in¬formant, and deciding that it was a matterthat he shouldn’t involve himself in, in¬structed Ruff to begin an inquiry. Levi’saction was criticized by some, who saidthat such an issue should not have beenautomatically referred since it did notdirectly relate to Watergate. Otherspraised Levi for his willingness to seejustice done. In mid-October, prosecutorRuff cleared Ford of all charges.Unfortunately for Ford and Levi, thematter did not end there. John Deansuggested that Ford had attempted to4-The Chicago Maroon Tuesday, FebruaryS, 1977block testimony before a House committeewhich would have implicated the Nixonadministration in Watergate during thetime that Ford was Minority Leader.Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman (D-N Y) demanded that Levi investigate thesenew charges. The Justice Departmentannounced on October 20 that Holtzman’srequest had been rejected on the basis ofFord’s earlier testimony during his con¬firmation hearings along with his recentdenial of the charges. Holtzman attackedLevi’s conclusion that there was nocredible evidence, old or new, making aninvestigation appropriate as a new“coverup”. Several days later, NBC newscorrespondent Carl Stem reported thatLevi’s decision was made despite the factthat 2 key witnesses, William Timmonsand Richard Cook, had not beenquestioned by the Justice Departmentunder oath. There were more charges anddenials before the issue finally fizzled out.Levi ordered Kelley off a planebound for Albuquerque and ad¬vised him to tone down a speechhe was about to make. Kelleysubsequently deleted a number ofremarks from his prepared textwhich had criticized unnamedmembers of the press.Many observers of the situation couldn’thelp but note that Levi, in his proper at¬tempts to act independently, had in theprocess damaged, at least to some extent,the Ford re-election campaign. It was alsopointed out that it was only one in a seriesof embarrassments that Levi had dealt toPresident Ford. Another prominent one, ofcourse, was Levi’s position on the Bostonbusing case.Busing & Civil RightsCivil rights activists and liberals hadlong charged that the Nixon-Ford Ad¬ministration was turning back the clock onracial integration. Edward Levi’s two-year term is generally regarded by thesesame people as having been a change forthe better — not because Levi greatlyadvanced the cause of minorities, butbecause he avoided slipping any furtherback.Levi’s actions on the school busingproblem conform to this analysis. On onehand, he refused to buckle under to thestrong anti-busing prejudice of the FordWhite House. On the other hand, hevacillated enough on the issue to givecomfort to foes of school busing. Eitherway, Levi’s grappling with the busingissue was one of the major stories of 1976.President Ford had never supportedforced school busing, and in his effort tostave off the challenge posed by con¬servative Ronald Reagan in theRepublican primaries, he became in¬creasingly outspoken about his irritationwith the courts’ role in the situation. OnMay 14, it was reported that the JusticeDepartment was considering joining a suitopposed to the “Garrity Order” imposinga school busing plan on Boston and forcingthe Supreme Court to “clarify” boundarieson the use of busing as a tool for in¬tegration. Four days later, PresidentialPress Secretary Ron Nessen announcedthat the President had indeed instructedLevi to look for a busing case which hecould challenge before the Supreme Court.Boston was only one of a number ofpossibilities.For the next 10 days, the media,prominent citizens, and other politicianscreated a public furor. The reaction of thepro-busing forces was unexpectedly harsh.Attention was focused on the AttorneyGeneral, and a major decision effectingschools and racial harmony was im¬minently expected. The Justice Depart¬ment was descended upon by busing ad¬vocates and opponents, and each new daybrought new revelations from “un¬disclosed sources describing the goings*yon.According to insiders, this 10-day periodsaw Levi weighing the wisdom of enteringinto the Boston suit while his subordinatesbattled to convince him one way oranother. Solicitor General Robert Bork (aformer Levi law student) pressed the anti¬busing case and Assistant AttorneyGeneral for Civil Rights J. Stanley Pot-tinger pleaded for Levi not to get involved.Finally, in a statement issued May 29, Leviannounced that he had decided that theBoston case was not the appropriate vehicle by which to challenge forcedbusing before the Supreme Court “at thepresent time”. Robert Bork, speaking forLevi, said that the decision was made onlegal grounds, but he refused to elaborate.Civil rights groups like the NAACP heaveda sigh of relief, and they were generallyjoined by the nation’s press, which agreedthat Levi had ultimately used wisejudgement.President Ford, obviously disappointed,issued a statement supporting Levi’sdecision, but asked him to continue hissearch for alternatives to restrict busing.Levi and Bork proceeded to developlegislation which was delivered toCongress in June. According to the outlineof the Levi plan, court-ordered busingwould be limited to a 5 year period in anycommunity that made “good faith efforts”to desegregate. Busing orders wouldoriginally be ordered for 3 years, and, ifhearing turned up continued evidence ofsegregation, allowed to continue for amaximum of two more years. Therationale behind the proposal was thatbusing was only a transitional remedywhose purpose of achieving reasonableracial balance could be fulfilled in shortperiods of time in a mobile modernsociety. According to Levi, “. . . theassumption would be made that busingcould be discontinued.” Civil rightsleaders like Roy Wilkins, who had hailedLevi’s May 29 decision, now castigatedhim for forgiving a legal antibusing stand.The motives of the Administration andLevi in the busing issue have been highlydebated. Two schools of thought, notnecessarily exclusive emerged. It wasthought by some that the Administration’spurpose was to generate publicity over itsopposition to busing to help win votes forPresident Ford in crucial primary states.To others, it was just as likely that theAttorney General was genuinely con¬cerned that the busing situation had beencarried too far, and was interested in aclarifying principled decision on thematter. Regardless of intent, however, theway the decision-making process wasexecuted and reported in the mediamanaged to create the impression thatLevi was playing games, and ultimately itmay have hampered the credibility of hisDepartment in any subsequent dealingswith the problem.Aside from busing, Levi’s record on civilrights issues received mixed reviews. TheCivil Rights Division, under StanleyPottinger, was praised by civil liber¬tarians for its aggressive work in¬vestigating FBI oversights and in insuringthat minority groups were not short¬changed in public aid programs run by thecities. Some leading liberals weredisappointed in other actions, particularlyLevi’s refusal to let an outside commissionre-investigate the Martin Luther Kingassassination. Levi preferred to keep theongoing investigation in the JusticeDepartment.CrimeOne of the first areas in which Levi madenews was with his Gun Control Plan whichwas introduced early in his first year inoffice. Basically, he sounded a moderateapproach, but had difficulty getting aSenate sponsor. Levi’s proposal called fora ban on all Saturday Night Specials (atype of small handgun), security checks tobe run on all handgun purchasers, andmandatory prison sentences for all per¬sons convicted of a crime involving adangerous weapon. Not in the plan was anidea which had earlier been sounded out byLevi — a ban on all handgun possession(except in homes and businesses) inmetropolitan areas with high levels ofviolent crime. As The Chicago Tribunesaid, Levi’s plan attempted to concentrateon a few pressure points rather than abroad program. Not surprisingly, Levi’smoderate proposals alienated manygroups. The National Rifle Associationwasn’t happy with restricted ownership.Others wondered why Levi hadn’t beenmore strict on all handguns Levi’s reply tothe criticism in a U.S. News and WorldReport interview was almost apologetic:he said that his proposal “was an attemptto come to terms with the situation” andhis bill was meant to stimulate public discussion. He added that he had avoidedany sort of registration program because“registration” was an “irritating” word.Levi’s basic philosophy on the problemof crime in America was untraditional foran Attorney General. The reason for thetremendous increases in crime in thiscountry, he stated, is that “we have acountry which is very tolerant and hasbeen willing to take a degree oflawlessness which is rather surprising.”First and foremost, the public’s com¬placent attitude must change. Pressureshould be put on judges to send repeatingoffenders to jail. Prosecutors and policeshould not be so reluctant to enforce lawsin minority communities in what Levilabeled a form of almost inverse racism.As for the death penalty, Levi said that hefavored it for a limited number of crimes— but only if society made up its mindfirmly to have it. The death penalty can bea deterrent, he said, but the decision on itsuse should be left up to the statelegislatures.During his term Levi also moved toclean up the federal Drug EnforcementAgency (DEA), which had been beset byproblems of corruption, misuse of man¬power, and internal bickering. He firedDEA director John Bartels (a move whichTribune columnist Bob Weidrich labeledshoddy and defensive) and replaced himwith a temporary director, whose placewas later taken by Chicagoan PeterBensinger. Bensinger has since beenasked to stay on in the Carter ad¬ministration.The often-frustrating war on the im¬portation of illicit narcotics into thiscountry provoked Levi to make somecomments about marijuana which let himin for a barrage of harsh criticism. Levimade the following comment in a ChicagoTribune interview:“One of the problems in the frequentsuggestions that we really shouldn’t worryabout marijuana — that it ought to bedecriminalized — is that we re askingother countries to clamp down (on drugs)at the same time we’re apparently in¬dicating that as far as we’re concerned, wedon’t think its (the drug problem soserious.”To many critics, including TheWashington Post, equating the symbolismof decriminalizing marijuana with illegalshipments of heroin was patentlyridiculous and represented the “last line”in a weak defense against moreprogressive governmental attitudes aboutdrug-related issues.Levi’s comments about marijuanadecriminalization and the reasons for thehigh crime rate, coupled with his strangebehavior on the Watergate Bill, lengthycogitation on the school busing issue, aswell as the strict standards he imposed onthe FBI, combine to create a packagewhich is difficult to decipher. Levi wasconsistently doing surprising things. Themarijuana comment was not his only fauxpas: last August he accused the NRA andACLU of “going crazy” over issues likegun control and wiretapping and in theprocess making candid discussion on thesetopics by society impossible. Nor was hislack of orthodoxy limited to his views oncrime. When the new Federal ElectionLaw was being challenged by SenatorBuckley and Eugene McCarthy before theSupreme Court, Levi’s Justice Depart¬ment, instead of defending the law innormal fashion, filed briefs on both sides ofthe issue, since Levi supported part of thenew law, but thought that other sections,notably those relating to compaign con¬tributions, were unconsititutional.Another major criticism of Levi was thathe was too indecisive and wasn’t providingthe Justice Department with enoughleadership. To others, Levi was a prac¬titioner of the “politics of caution”. AsAnthony Lewis of the New Republic wrote,one of the pitfalls of a nonpolitical JusticeDepartment was that it could slide into therut of being a headless bureaucracy. Alongtins same line, some subordinatesreportedly labeled Levi’s office “theWaffle Shop.”Supporters of Levi hastened to point outthat what often was perceived as publicwaffling w'as actually a view into the At¬Levi's adamant opposition was most newsworthy because it cameto the surface late in the discussion, in the last month before theBill's passage. It put the Ford Administration in the difficultposition of opposing a Watergate reform in an election year.According to columnists, the source of Levi's 'folly' were hisdefiant obliviousness to politics. torney General’s mode of decision¬making. Levi, as the product of anacademic environment where the rationalprocess of reasoning is often more highlyvalued than the correct answer itself,made a special effort to hear arguments onboth sides of a given issue. What appearedto be vacillation was actually logicalprogression.An evaluation of Levi’s success as anadministrator offers no one-sided con¬clusion. . . He definitely cleaned up theoperation of a number of Justice Depart¬ment divisions. Yet, Levi’s Department ofJustice was not really a tight ship. Much ofthe difficulty here could well have been theself-perpetuating nature of governmentalbureaucracies. Many top level posts werefilled by political appointees, the firing ofwhom would present a sticky situation.Many lower level officials were mediocreat best — and there was surprise amongsome observers that more thorough staffchanges were not instituted. Anotherreason for administrative hassles couldhave been Levi’s own preference to workon the “big picture” while leaving the day-to-day running of the Department to chiefdeputy Harold (Ace) Tyler.Overall, Levi’s relationship withCongress seemed to be satisfactory. Hisrelationship with the White House was afar more complex story. Levi claimed thatFord never interfered with his running ofthe Department and never pressured himto take particular stands on issues. Cer¬tainly the President’s public expressionsof confidence in the Attorney General,even after Ford’s disappointment byBoston busing decision, are consistent withthis assertion. Nevertheless, there wereoccasional rumors of White-House/Attorney General strife, if not in¬volving the President then at least in¬volving White House aides and otherCabinet officers. Besides the busing andWatergate-related problems this pastsummer, other actions by the AttorneyGeneral were said to have been particularcauses of irritation. First, soon after hetook office. Levi testified before the SenateCommerce Committee on no-fault autoinsurance. Transportation SecretaryWilliam Coleman had earlier put theAdministration on record in support of no¬fault legislation, but when Levi was askedhis opinion, he replied that he thought thatno-fault raised serious constitutionalproblems. A second incident took placethree weeks before the crucial Floridaprimary when the Justice DepartmentAnother major criticism of Leviwas that he was too indecisive andwasn't providing the JusticeDepartment with enoughleadership. Some subordinatesreportedly labeled Levi's office"the Waffle Shop."announced that it was planning to retry-former Republican Senator EdwardGurney on charges of tax evasion.Although Gerald Ford has been praised forhis firm support of Levi, it is hard tobelieve that White House insiders werealways comfortable by an independentchief of the Justice Department.Levi’s staunch independence almostuniversally redounds to his credit. At hisfirst press conference in April 1975, thenew Attorney General elucidated histheory that the Justice Department “isn’tto be used as a partisan political in¬strument . . . either consciously or un¬consciously.” The record indicates that hefollowed his theory.There are many people, particularlyliberals, who are somewhat disappointedwith the lack of progressive andimaginative actions taken by the JusticeDepartment under Levi’s tutelage Yetputting substantitive differences aside,most observers believe that, at aminimum. Levi, like Gerald Ford in thepresidency, restored the dignity and in¬tegrity which had been missing in recentyears from his office. Perhaps it is a sadcommentary on the state of the Americanpolitical system, when, instead of beingassumed attributes, a public official’sdignity and integrity become his mostpraised virtues.Justin Stanley. President of the Amer-can Bar Association, summed up theevaluation of Levi as many do: “Ed Levi isan unusually able man, who by thestrength of his character and performancerestored public confidence in the office ofthe Attorney General. ”The Chicago Maroon Tuesday. February!. 1977 5Thinclads whip IBCBy FRANK MERRIWELLThe university men’s track club had it’sfirst big win this weekend as theydestroyed all competition at the IllinoisBenedictine Track meet, in Lisle, Illinois.Placing a man in every event except thepole vault Chicago compiled 72 V2 points atthe ten team meet. Host IllinoisBenedictine was second with 40 points.Although most of the team placed in atleast one event, team captain JohnSchuster had the best day of all. The fouryear veteran set the area record in themile, winning with a time of 4:29.6 on the150 yard and track. He came back twohours later to win the 880 going away. Also,on the verge of running a winning milerelay anchor leg, Schuster had to settle forsecond when the IBC anchor man took alittle home court advantage, by running aslightly shorter route through one of theturns.Lester Savit, ran the fastest leg of themile relay team and had put Schuster infront. Savit was also the front man of theMaroon 1-2 finish in the quarter, with BillHorsthemke taking second.Marshall Schmitt had the only otherChicago coming in first in the 1.000 yardrun.There were many other fine per¬formances. Julian Brown had a busy dayfinishing fourth in the mile and fifth in the1,000. Clay Skinner gutted out a toughsecond in the 880 while Tim Bastian, PeteSmith, and Dave Rieser all took fourths inthe 600, two mile and 1,000 respectively.Chicago sprinters were also able tomake their presence known. Rich Gordontook a very close third in the 60 yeard dash,while Tom Goodrich. Jim Jacobsen andJim Read took second third and fifth in the60 yard high hurdles.Maroons were not lacking in the fieldevents either. James Carter took second inthe high jump while Mike Karluc heavedfor third in the shot put. Last year’s Bond Medal winner Craig LaSota got over thesex and drugs of college camp to take thirdin the triple jump and a fourth in the highjump. Pete Wendell also managed a fourthin the triple jump and took fifth in the longjump.Coach Ted Hay don saw in the meet “aninteresting demonstration of balance anddepth,” and was generally pleased with histeam’s performance. “It just shows thatour Armory training isn’t all that bad.” hesaid. “As for the conference, well, theindications are that we will do moderatelywell, at least in the top three.”Noting that the competition was not thebest the team had faced Coach Havdonstill pointed out how nice it was to win.“Anytime the guys find out that they cancompete with people with twn arms andtwo legs it’s a good experience.”Chicago will have their next good ex¬perience February 18th when they take onLewis, Bradley, Wheaton and NorthCentral in beautiful Naperville. Illinois. 4k'* , ■John Schuster, shown here during cross country season, doubled for two wins inSaturday’s meet. Pete Smith, with mouth open, is behind, (photo courtesy of Capand Gown)IM report: upset cityTufts beats Vincent, Shoes win againBy R.W. ROHDETufts house shocked Vincent Friday,beating the former champions 41-37. Thewin gives Tufts the white league cham¬pionship, while Vincent is retired from allfurther play. Tufts probably metShoreland 9 & 10 in playoff action lastnight.Tufts was psyched for the game, w'hileVincent seemed a little too calm, perhapsoverconfident. Both teams played a sloppygame at the start, turning over the ball andmissing easy shots, and it was only after 3 and a half minutes were gone that Tuftsscored the first basket.But by halftime Tufts had it together andled by 7, a lead they maintainedthroughout most of the third quarter.Vincent never really looked like the teamthat won the championship last quarter,and it was only in the fourth quarter thatthey staged a last minute rally. They werewithin one with two minutes left, but someclutch foul shooting by Greg Pope put thegame away.The refs, for intramurals, were fairlygood. Considering the pressure of the game, as well as officiating in front of acrowd of around 100 people, they weresatisfactory. Even so, one would questionwhether the IM department shouldn't haveput more experienced refs on the game.At any rate, with Vincent out. everythingis wide open. Tufts looks like the team tobeat, if they recover from their victoryparty.In other action, Lower Wallace smashedShoreland 11 Saturday afternoon 36-5. TheWallace team will meet Low'er Flint forthe undergradute championship, and thewinner of that will take on The LearnedHands.Build yourSALES/MARKETINGMANAGEMENTCAREERwith Hilti, the leading world¬wide manufacturer of fasteningsystems for construction.If you have a degree (MBA preferred),some business or military experienceand are anxious to grow, an exceptionalfuture could await you in lines salesmaijagement at one of our many regionaloffices throughout the U S or at ourcorporate headquarters in Stamford.ConnecticutWe require an aggressive, success-oriented and extremely versatile indiv¬idual with the ability to excel in either aline sales or a staff positionOur intensive field sales training program, leads directly toa career in one of the following areas■ District Sales Manager with supervisory responsibilityfor 4 to 8 salesmen■ Market Planning Manager with responsibility for anentireSates Region■ National Account salesCompensation while you are training will be in the mid teens depending uponyour qualifications and locationWe are a young tough hard driving organization with the fastest growth ratein the industry We have doubled in size during the last three yearshhlttiFASTENING SYSTEMS FOR CONSTRUCTIONONE CUMMINGS POINT RD.STAMFORD, CONN 06904An equal opportunity employer M F Contact your PlacementOffice and sign upfor an interviewOur representative willbe on campus February 10. - REYNOLDS CLUBWEDNESDAY CONCERTNOONTIMERSFebruary 9 Gilbert and SullivanRevueSelections performed bymembers of theH M.S. Pinafore cast.^All concerts are at noon; all are free.f..i They are part of the Student Activities Office4 Battery Chargers (Winter tune-ups for mind,body & soul)Washington CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTSannouncesMUSIC AUDITIONSFOR ADMISSION AND SCHOLARSHIPS, 1977 78FOR INSTRUMENTALISTS AND VOCALISTSSaturday, February 12, 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.Sunday, February 13, 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.Northshore Music Center,300 Green Bay Rd., Winnetka, IllinoisFor appointment or information, call or write:Office of Admissions California Institute of the Arts24700 McBean Parkway, Valencia, California(805) 255-1050BFA, MFA and Certificate Programs. Schools ofArt and Design, Dance, Film/Video, Music and Theatre.LRDY SINGS THE BLUESThur. lO & Sat. 127:00 & 9:45 p.m l-HOUSE SI.506-The Chicago Maroon Tuesday. February8,1977CLASSIFIED ADS Good clean contest Large bars of RSON ALSSPACEGrad stdnt-own rm. new bid. at 48 &the Lake $85 mo 624-1892 eves.Room for female student 4 blks fromcampus bath kitch priv $110 month tel324 4481.1 bdrm coachouse apt frplce availMarch 1st $60/mo 493-3399Spacious Hyde Parkroommate. Call 955 5932. apt. wantsApt for rent 3 bdrms $240/mo & upavail Feb. 15/Mr 1,924-5964.Large bedroom in 3 bedroom apt with2 male UC students $78/month 1517 E.57th 493-3343.Roommate wanted to share spaciousS. Shore apt with 3 congenial working-students. 5 bdrms., 3 baths, washerdryer, Call 288 5799.5 & 6 room apts in building beingrehabilitated 5 min from UC on 61st St.Coleman Corp. 373-1800PEOPLE WANTEDPrinter/Student to learn operation ofDavidson offset press, two-color work.Experience preferred. If not,photographic and mechanical ex¬perience accepted. 12-16 hours perweek. Good salary. Call David Shields753-2518 mornings only.SINGERS wanted to join FirstUnitarian Church choir for May 1stconcert. Thomas Peck, director RehThurseve 324-4100.$2.00/hour. Subjects wanted forpsycholinguistics experiments,Department of Behavioral Sciences.Call 753-4718 to registerOne boyfriend to send me roses onValentines Day. H.M.S. Pinafore, Gilbert and Sullivanfavorite, at Mandel Hall Feb. 18 & 19.Fri. at 8 $2.50 & $4.00, Sat at 1:30 $2.50,8pm $3.50 & $5.00.FOLKDANCING is the poetry of thefoot—come join U of C Folkdancers atIda Noyes 8pm Sun., general level andMon, beginning level, 50 cents; alsoFri, all Levels. Except Fri. Feb 11,Every week.SUMMER JOBS: FREE (50) stateinfo on over 2000 summer employerssend stamped, self addressed envelope to: SUMCHOICE, Box 645,State College, PA. 16801. Good clean contest. Large bars ofIvory soap available in INH 209 35cents Deadline for entries is Feb 18.3-3591 for info.PAN PIZZADELIVEREDThe Medici Delivers from 10 p.m.weekdays, 5-11 Saturday, 667 7394Save 60 cents if you pick it up yourselfBOOKS BOUGHTBooks bought & sold everyday,everynight 9-11, Powells, 1501 E 57thSt. Books due Feb 11? The Library willgive you a receipt if«you ask, can burnyou if you don't have one Be safe-getone. (SG)Student Govt needs people. We meetnext Tuesday, Feb 8 in Ida Noyes at7:30. Come and fill a vacancy in mostGrad divisions. Other CollegeFraternities, or dorms Tufts, Shorey,Blackstone.LOST: Mans brown fur hat in SocialScience Bldg Feb 2 Wed $10 REWARDFor return call 288 5622.Hi hot stuff!WRITERS' WORKSHOP PL 2-8377 Pregnancy Testing Sat. 10-2Augustana Church, 5500 S. WoodlawnBring 1st morning urine sample $1.50donation. Southside Women's Health.324 2292You missed your chance to ask. That'sthe only way you'll get a Valentine!Warm thanks from ail Hyde Parkpedestrians to those of you who areconsiderate enough to shovel yourwalk.What do wonder dogs do?Regenstein coffee may taste bad but itactually contains a very powerfulaphrodisiac. Indeed it is so strong thatrendez vous have been occuring in farreaches of the shelves, giving newmeaning to a young lady being “reallystackedThis is not a gossip column! Aphrodite and Helen would both envyyour beauty. Smile at me and I will byyour foreverThe kid.The question the whole world wants toknow: who does Pedro's hair?Hi! I'm Jaime the freelance blowdryerTo a RIP-OFF: Keep the watch, whynot return the "Olympia Beer'' backpack and empty wallet, to Ida Noyesor Ad Building.Ripped Off.page 5DeIts do it better.OVERSEAS JOBS-summer/year-round Europe, S. America, Australia,Asia, etc. All fields. $500 $1200 monthly. Expenses paid, sightseeing. Freeinform -write: International JobCenter, Dept. 11, Box 4490 Berkeley,CA 94704.PEOPLEFOR SALEExperienced babysitter will babysit inher home on the campus Call 667-5816.Free lance artist wants work Port¬folio available Experienced inillustration and advertising Call 947-0030Artist does figure preparation, graphs,charts, for academic papers and ar¬ticles. Quality work, reasonable rates.Call 955 8476.French Tutorials with expd Frenchnative teacher 324-8054Interested in typing evenings in myhome. Will discuss price Barbara 373-3594 after 5:30 p.m.SCENESRoses are red/violets are blue/comeValentine's Day/wear a hole in yourshoe. US folkdancers invite you toenjoy music, dance and goodies at St.V's party, Mon. Feb. 14, Ida Noyes.DON MOYE, Julius Hemphill,Malachi Favors Concert. Feb 11 IdaNoyes Hall 8pm $2 50/Breat BlackMusic Series by the Chicago Front.• Eye Eianmations• Contact Leises (Soft l Hard)• Prescriptions FilledOR. MORTON R. MASLOVonomrrRiSTSHyde Park Skoppwg Center1510 E. 55th363-8363 Experiential focusing is a method forexploring and working on feelingsdeveloped by Eugene Gendin. It hassome similarities to meditation. Afocusing group will meet Mon. nightsat Chicago Counseling Center. $35. 6841800 for info.EUROPE/WORLDWIDE academicdiscounts year round. SATA 4228 First,Tucker, GA. 30084 ( 800 241-9082).There will be a meeting of the USWomen's Track and Field Team,Thursday- February 10 in the IdaNoyes- Memorial Room, 2nd Floor at7:00 p.m. All interested women shouldattend or call Coach Larkin, 753-3574.FOR SALEHouse sale Thurs aft, eve 8. Fri. morn.5128 S. Hyde Park #2, 288 2352 Goodthings cheap.1971 Buick Skylark—Green, V-8, A/C.Body fair, engine good. $750.288 6568.FUJI CASSETTE TAPEISCOMING!Model Camera1344 E. 55th St. 493-6700COURSE EVALATNSSG is preparing an evaluation book.We need people to help us. ContactKathy Edwards, Math Dept, or cometo SG Tues nite.GAY LIBOFFICE MEETING Tues. Feb. 8, 7pmoutside rm 301, Ida Noyes.FOR MYVALENTINESend a message via Upper-Wallace'sdelivery service. Cost: 25 cents, or 50cents w/carnation. Will be deliveredon Feb 14 to any undergraduate hours.On sale in Woodward Court CW Feb 7-11 from 11:30-12:30 and 5:30-6:30.KI-AIKIDOFree demonstration Tuesday, Feb. 8,7:30 at the Blue Gargoyle, 57th &University, 2nd floor.HOMERIC SOCIETYProf Frederick Brenk MarquetteUniv, to speak on Aphrodite's Girdle:Near Eastern Evidence. Wed. Feb. 164:30, Classics 10.VIRGINSPref. female, to participate in verynasty occult ritual April 30 All gloryno work. Call Peter 288-3598 No Weirdos.OFFICE WORK AVAILABLETOP WAGESSec ys stenos. Dictaphone Operators:Challenging jobs in the Loop and on the SouthSide.2 or 3 Days a week or full weeksApply in person. Suite 631, Hyde park BankBuilding 1 525 E. 53rd StreetELAINE REVELL, INC.Contact: C. powell - 684-7000Chicago s Prestige Tomporary Office Service YOU NEED ACAMERA ?DISCOVERMINOL TAThe new MinoltaSR-T 201.It makes finephotographyeasy. Andeasy to afford.The Minolta SR-T 201 isloaded with features, qualityand value. Come in for ademonstration, and see whyMinoltas are the best selling35mm single lens reflexcameras in America SRT 201 W/50mm F/1.7 lensregularly $259.90Three-day SaleFebruary 9,10,11Special s227.95U. of C. Bookstore5750 S. EllisSecond Floor753-3317Photo Dept.Check other Minolta prices!!MINOLTA DEMO, FRI.,FEB. 11,10 a.m. - 4 p.m.ILLINOIS CHAMBER ORCHESTRARafael Duian, Guest Conductor Tonight. Tues., Feb. 88:30 Mandel Hall$1.00 Students. S2.00 OthersThe Chicago Maroon-Tuesday, February 8,1977-7Theonlycheaper waytosee Europeistoenlist2months,unlimitedSecondClasstraintravel,13countries,$230. CheckitoutAStudent-Railpassisasuperdeal;thebestandcheapestwaytoseealotoftheContinentTramsarefast,comfortable,frequentAndtheyspeedyoutotheheartofcitiesStationsarelikesmalltownswitheverythingatravelerneeds.Youmeetfellowbackpackers(Europeans,too)Youcansleeponboard;couchettesarebargains.YourStudent-Railpass evencoverssomeferrysteamerandmotorcoachridesBestofallwiththePassyoucanstayloose, parkwhereyoulike,moveonatwhimThere'salwaysanothertrainyoucancatch.TogetaStudent-Railpassyouhavetobeafull-timestudentunder26BothStudent-Railpass andEurailpassaresoldherethroughyourTravelAgent.Youcan'tbuytheminEuropeIfyou'velessthanormorethantwomonths,getaEurailpassSameideabutyourideFirstClass. Availableintwoorthree-weekPasses,orone,two,orthree-monthPasses.Ifyou’renotabouttoenlistwhynotplantoseeEuropewithaStudent-Railpass. No.youwon’thavetopassaphysical. Student-Railpass,BoxQ StatenIsland.NY10305 PleasesendmefreeinformationonEurope'sbiggesttravel bargain,Student-RailpassandEurailpass. Name Address- City MyTravelAgentis_State_I AUSTRIA*i■■ BELGIUMDENMARK FRANCEGERMANYHOLLAND192-408ITALYLUXEMBOURG NORWAYPORTUGAL SPAINSWEDEN SWITZERLANDTheChicagoMaroon Vol.86,No.34Leviat Justice