Volumne 78, Number 24 The University of Chicago Tuesday, November 25, 1969Connie M a ravelIW insPost as SG PresidentStudents for a Political Alternative isholding a meeting in Rosenwald 2 at 8 p.m.Wednesday night. Speakers at the meetingwill discuss the Radinsky decision.Student government (SG) passed a reso¬lution Sunday night which read in part: licizing all of SG’s dealings with the admin¬istration and also by increasing the in¬volvement of all members of the assemblyin SG affairs.”Immediately following her election to thepresidency, Miss Maravell resigned her po¬sition on ODRSO, a post she has held sincelast spring.At the start of the Sunday evening meet¬ing Michael Barnett spoke to the assembly.He spoke of the issues presently facing theassembly, and expressed optimism for SG’sfuture. In reviewing the past months, Barn¬ett said, “I think we have accomplishedsome things.” Specifically he pointed to amarked change in the attitudes of some ad¬ministrators toward SG.Under the chairmanship of the new presi¬dent, the assembly discussed die placing ofstudent observers on the Council of theFaculty Senate. Barnett explained that theCouncil had rejected SG’s request that stu¬dent observers be permitted to sit with theCouncil.Upon the recommendation of the execu¬tive council of SG, a motion directing theassembly to elect three observers and spec¬ifying that they are to attempt to sit withthe Council at that body’s next meeting waspassed unanimously by the assembly. Thatmotion also stated that the three observersshould prepare the groundwork for presen¬tation to the Council of SG’s request tohave observers on the Council.An election was then held to decide onthree observers. The three observers cho¬sen by election in accordance with the rec¬ommendation of the executive council wereConnie Maravell, David Bensman, and BillGriffith, a graduate student in mathemat¬ics.The assembly considered the issue of stu¬dent discipline. A motion “petitioning thestudent-faculty-administration (SFA) courtto issue a declaratory judgement upon thelegality of the procedures employed by theOaks, Shireman, and Lucas committees,”was presented by Eugene Goldberg, ’71 andwas subsequently passed by the assembly.Goldberg’s motion further stated that,“SG feels that these committees have notacted in accordance with article 15 of thestudent bill of rights, ‘the right to fair andimpartial trial with all due process of thelaw in disciplinary matters.’ ”In proposing his motion Goldberg said,“The motion does not call into question theUniversity’s right to make a disciplinarycommittee, just the procedures used in thepast ones.” He further pointed out that theUniversity has recognized the right of theSFA court to deal with this type of issue asnoted in the SG constitution.Barnett proposed another motion on thestudent disciplinary procedure, specificallyregarding the newly established Lucascommittee, which is to hold hearings of stu-Continued on Page Four“In several recent faculty appointmentand promotion decisions, student opinionwas neither adequately solicited northoughtfully considered. There is evidencethat political views remain a considerationin the question of renewal of tenure.”Steve AokiLEONARD RADINSKY The resolution was proposed by PeterTenure to be re-considered Kranz, a graduate student in geophysics.Radinsky, Laws Not Given Tenure;Radinsky Decision To Be ExaminedMADAME PRESIDENT; Connie Maravell, elected SG president Sunday after MikeBarnett resigned, chairs the meeting. The student government (SG) assemblyelected Connie Maravell, a graduate stu¬dent in the business school and formerchairman of the committee on recognizedstudent organizations (CORSO), to fill thepost of president of SG Sunday evening.This election was held to fill the vacancycreated when Michael Barnett resignedfrom the presidency last week. Nominatedalong with Miss Maravell to fill the officewere David Bensman, speaker of the un¬dergraduate house and Frank Day, chair¬man of SG’s housing committee.In addressing the SG assembly prior toher election. Miss Maravell pledged to“find ways of reaching the silent majorityon the UC campus.” She went on to saythat teas could be done “by constantly pub-By Steve CookLen Radinsky, an assistant professor ofanatomy and in the committee on evolu¬tionary biology, was denied tenure lastweek by the faculty evaluation committeeon anatomy. The committee, made up ofall the tenured faculty of the departmentgranted Radinsky a three year terminal ap¬pointment.At a departmental meeting Thursday,called to discuss the committee’s recom¬mendation, junior faculty and graduate stu¬dents objected to the decision. A meeting ofthe committee was called for Wednesdaynight, at which time a final recommenda¬tion will be determined.“The tenured faculty is reconstructingtheir decision of last week, therefore I donot wish to make any public comments onit until they announce their decision,” saidRadinsky Monday evening.Radinsky supported last year’s sit-in andhas been active in the campus chapter ofthe radical New University Conference(NUC). He also helped organize Faculty Resist, a resistance group, and spoke at theViet Nam convocation here two weeksago.Radinsky came here in September, 1967,when he was appointed an assistant profes¬sor. Before teat time, be studied atBrooklyn College and Boston University.Last year he was elected to the Council ofthe University Senate.Robert Uretz, chairman of the biophysicsdepartment and a member of the eval¬uation committee said, “That question(Radinsky’s tenure decision) is still open,and I’m waiting further communicationsfrom the department. I have no hint ofany consideration of politics in the decision.My personal opinion is that I can’t imaginethat it would enter into anyone’s privateconversation.”Ronald Singer, chairman of the depart¬ment of anatomy, was unavailable for com¬ment Monday.According to Leigh Van Valen, assistantprofessor of anatomy, the reasons for Ra-Radinsky’s not getting the tenure weremade public to members of the depart¬ment. He said they included criticism ofRadinsky’s research and that the space inthe department is limited.According to a reliable source, academicevaluations from outside the University ofRadinsky’s research were positive.Student opinion of Radinsky’s teachingwas not gathered on a systematic basis,though individual students were asked tocomment.The New University Conference will dis¬tribute a position paper on the Radinskycase, despite the outcome. NUC met lastnight to discuss the issue. By Sue LothJudith Long Laws, assistant professor inthe business school and advocate of wom¬en’s rights, has been given a two-year ter¬minal contract.The business school’s evaluation com¬mittee gave her the contract after eval¬uating work Mrs Laws did two years ago asan instructor while working on her PhD dis¬sertation and last year as assistant profes¬sor.As the watchdog committee of the Uni¬versity women’s association (UWA) statedat last Thursday’s woman’s committeehearings, “Normally, junior faculty mem¬bers are given a second three-year contractbased on their performance during theirfirst two years as assistant professor.“Tenure decisions are usually made onthe basis of performance during the secondthree-year period,” yet the tenure decisionfor Mrs Laws was decided after only oneyear as assistant professor, they noted.Mrs. Laws, who describes herself as “anContinued on Page ThreePttil LattwopJUDITH LONG LAWSDenied tenure Ml business school .... Last IssueToday’s issue is the last regularnews issue of the fall quarter. Nextweek, we will publish a special issueon “Hyde Park as a State of Mind,”a feature issue describing HydePark, the city’s view of students,living in Hyde Park, life styles ofstudents, and the history of HydePark as a University community.The results of the poll appearingin last Friday’s issue will be includedin this special issue, so hurry up andget your answers in.LETTERS TO THE EDITORS OF THE MAROONWhither SDS? 'I thought it would never happen. I’d beengoing to meetings since junior high and Ihad yet to be evicted. Then, on Monday,November 17,1 went to a UC/SDS (Worker-Student Alliance) meeting that was calledto deal with the free meals’ fight and con¬sequences. Ads for the meeting had pro¬claimed “all are invited.” I assumed thatby virtue of my humanity, I was an inher¬ent part of the “all,” hence, invited.Now being afflicted with “shooting off atthe mouth disease,” I engaged in pre-meet¬ing discussion with some few members ofSDS. I admitted mortal crimes to them;among them my advocacy of capitalismand my membership in a group known asSCAF (Students For Capitalism and Free¬dom). To my delight, I found these SDSersto be, for the most part, well-informed andamused by my point of view. However, onemember asked me if I wouldn’t mind leav¬ing the meeting for “my presence was dan¬gerous to the well-being of the group.”(Since all capitalists are fascists and sinceall fascists are cops, I was undoubtedly aCIA spy.) Of course, I wished to stay, andthe problem was brought to the attention ofthe whole group.The chairman stated the predicament;“there was a SCAFer among them.” Dis¬cussion was called for and the chairmanmotioned to the student to his right. Thismember said that SDS meetings are onlyopen to those opposed to racism and impe¬rialism, ergo, I’d have to leave. Was thereany more discussion? The chairman ig¬nored my hand and put the question. There¬upon, I yelled out a request for rebuttaltime and was promptly ruled out of order.However, on petition of several members, Iwas finally recognized. I said the obvious,“I am not a racist or an imperialist andhave the right to attend the meeting.”At this point, I was cut off by the studentto the Chairman’s right who said somethingabout the, difference between racism andimperialism as abstractions and as forcesin the real world. This time, my attemptsto defend myself were denounced as filibus¬ter, and the question was put to a vote. Thevote was not quite unanimous; there wereseveral abstentions. I lost overwhelminglyand left the meeting.Many things could be said about this SDSaction. I could talk about libertarian ideals,freedom and such, but much of what Iwould say would have meaning only tothose already opposed to SDS. Yet, thereremain at least two problems which shouldconcern us all.Debate on national and universal issuesis, today, at a peak. This debate generatesnumerous factions that often form intogroups. Frequently, it happens that argu¬ments become polarized and groups be¬come extraordinarily introverted. To attaina high level of cohesiveness, a group mayhave occasional purges and it may bar out¬siders from all its meetings. What resultsfrom this intense parochialism is the substi¬tution of dogma and party line for debate.SDS, by its refusal to allow even one dis¬senter to an “all invited meeting,” by itsrefusal to give that dissenter her just rightto self-defense, and by the refusal of SDSmembers to vote against the majority, hassilenced debate. All decisions reached bySDS have been made along rigid lines thatdo not permit the sort of self-examinationthat is essential to idea validation. chastise ardent anti-communist groupswhose vitriolic fight against communismoften threatens to destroy the very thingsthey claim to be saving, e.g. freedom, indi¬vidualism. Will the medicineman put anend to the patient as well as to the prob¬lem? I ask SDS to re-examine its methodsso as to make sure that its means don’tdestroy its ends. Students for a DemocraticSociety had better make sure it isn’t be¬coming Students For a Despotic Society.I suppose that when you get right down toit, what I am pleading for is tolerance, arespect for the differences of others (differ¬ences of color, race, ethnic background, re¬ligion, politics, ethics, etc.). Without toler¬ance, peace can never reign, and, in the21st century, without tolerance, man maynot exist.Sophie Cooper, 73OmbudsmanWe are presenting the facts in the selec¬tion of the ombudsman as an illustration ofwhat the Maroon editorial meant by “thediscouraging cycle.”Last year the selection caused discord.The administration said it did not want arepeat of that. It asked FSACCSL for ad¬vice. That committee suggested open appli¬cation procedures. So be it. During thesummer the president of Student Govern¬ment suggested that students be allowed tointerview the applicants and to make rec¬ommendations. The administration likedthe idea. SG appointed a committee whichspent at least 45 minutes with each candi¬date during the summer and fall. Further,the committee devoted several more hoursto preparing its report. The applicants wererank-grouped (i.e., a-b, most acceptable;c-e, fairly acceptable; f-g, least accept¬ able). The Maroon reported that all thecandidates would be interviewed by the ad¬ministration. Only TWO of the candidateswere interviewed, the ones who were al¬ready known to the administration mem¬bers giving the interviews. The other fiveapplicants had not worked with the admin¬istration members concerned, and theywere not interviewed.Now we register our disgust with thewhole procedure. The administration canhardly expect students to come forward ea¬gerly to offer their services, gratis, if stu¬dents come to the conclusion that theirhard work will yield scant results. We havebetter things to do with our time than toplay at the game of “symbolic student par¬ticipation.” We will be more cautious in of¬fering our help to the administration in thefuture.Constance Maravell, Rosemarie Gillespie,Michael Barnett, David Bensman, FrankDaySG Committee on the OmbudsmanSFA Court CaseAs one of the initiators of the attempt toinvolve the University in legal proceedingsregarding disciplinary matters, I would liketo explain the tactics and legality of the approach. The SFA court is being asked toissue a declaratory judgment on the legal¬ity of the procedures employed by theOaks, Shireman, and Lucas disciplinarycommittees, in accordance with article 5,section B, statement 9 of the SG con¬stitution. The issue involved is a determina¬tion of what was legitimate in the dis¬ciplinary procedures according to the stu¬dent bill of rights, article 15, first clause.The advantages to this tactic are many.To those more radical than myself, thecourt case need not involve a mass move¬ment, nor does it attempt to split anymovement already in the process of beingformed because of divergent goals. TheSDS demand for an end to University rac¬ism and the SFA court case are indepen¬dent events (in the statistical sense). Therewill be no excuse available that the ‘libs’sabotaged the movement if SDS is unsuc¬cessful.The methods being used are strictly le¬gitimate. The University has recognized theexistence of the SFA Court by appointingthree faculty on it (Oaks, Wegener, andPerry). An officer of the University corpo¬ration, the dean of students, has not seen fitto veto the particular clause of the SG con¬stitution that the case is based upon. As faras I can determine, the clause has been inthe SG constitution since 1957 and was nev¬er questioned before. To do so now wouldbe equivalent to the University admittingits hypocrisy, besides being ex post facto.The court case is based solely uponprocedural grounds; the right of the Uni¬versity to establish a disciplinary com¬mittee may only be questioned on very ob¬lique constitutional grounds. Personally, Ibelieve the University has no moral right toconstitute disciplinary committees designedfor political suppression, but I am at a lossto justify it legally. By using the guise of acourt case based upon procedural groundsone again raises the possibility of creatingdissension in the ranks of the faculty. Forthe first time, the issue is solely the proce¬dures emp’oyed. No other side questionswill enter into consideration.From my knowledge of intra-Universitypolitics, I imagine that the Council will en¬joy the challenge that the SFA Court casepresents them. It is the sort of thing thatthe faculty loves to do. As for the membersof the court (students: chief justice Davis;associates Steel, Webman, Culp, Rabino-witz, and Ratner), I am certain their dutiesas justices will dominate their personalopinions on the case. Their declaratoryjudgment will be based solely upon the ar¬guments presented to them. To aid in ourcase,- I would like to request that any stu¬dent disciplined by the Oaks or Shiremancommittee or in the process of being dis¬ciplined by the Lucas committee who wouldwish to serve as a witness in the prose¬cution of this case should contact me(phone 288-5503) or the Civil Rights Agencyin the law school (X-2425). We hope topresent an interesting indictment when theSFA Court comes into session.Eugene H. Goldberg, 71The other threat is one for which we often ELIZABETH GORDONHAIR DESIGNERS1620 E. 53rd St. BE-8-2000Vi V VI K I)CAMPUSREPRESENTATIVES4 GIRLS NEEDED$4 25 7 50 per hourBecome a demonstrator ofpersonal and home careproducts. Everyone needs them,so why not sell Uiem'.’Hexihit hours to fit aroundyour ''class schedule. Work inyour own area All trainingfurnishedHASTINGS \SS()( I AT I SI 7 \ SI A II SI< I IK \(,(). II I ISOISI or iiitoi v icw . cdll CM24 ELECTRA RECORDING ARTISTSTHROUGH DEC. 7“SPIDER” JOHN KOERNERandWILLIE MURPHYAll. AGES WELCOME!Shows at 9, 11 and 1-2:30Wednesday - Sunday nightsNew Location!QUIET KNIGHT953 West Belmont Ave.(Corner Sheffield) iPiZZAPLATTERPizza, Fried Chickenj Italian FoodsI Compare the Price111460 E. 53rd 643-2800I WE DELIVERjStraight Talk:Your diamond is at! 'Nf 'fwfifRS fOt 59 rfARS119 N. Wabash at WashingtonENGLEWOOD EVERGREEN PLAZAHearings For SDS Boycott To BeginDisciplinary procedures continue for stu¬dents summoned for their participation 'inthe November 12 SDS boycott of the C-Shopand Hutch Commons. Additional membersof SDS other than the original 14 to be sum¬moned have received notices to appear be¬fore the disciplinary committee.James Vice, assistant dean of students,said when asked why certain members ofSDS got their letters later than others, “Weof course did not summon non-students orpeople we did not know.” Speaking of onethird year student in the worker-student al¬liance (WSA) faction who has been sum¬moned Vice said, “The delay was depend¬ent on the development and identification ofphotographs.” .One WSA member said that he couldn’treally think of any reason that he and sev¬eral other SDS members received their no¬tices late. The only possible reason he said,“could be that they wanted to split off thenew people from SDS and demoralizethem.” When this did not work “they justdecided to purge the campus,” he said.SDS members have requested a collec¬tive defense. Prior to the request a Univer¬sity spokesman had said that a collectivedefense would be granted. He then went outof town so that SDS thinks, but is not sure,that the collective defense request has beengranted, an SDS spokesman said.The main hearing involving ten peoplewill be held Tuesday, December 2 at 1 pm.It is scheduled to be held in the basementof Ricketts, which has a seating capacity ofabout 100. SDS will petition to get the loca¬tion changed to Quantrell auditorium, ac¬cording to a member of SDS.During the disciplinary hearings, thecommittee will use no records of the ac¬cused students’ previous actions. Only ifthe students are found guilty will their pastrecords be examined before deciding dis¬cipline.Disciplinary action could be of the samenature as that resulting from last year’sadministration sit-in, ranging from warningto probation tp suspension and expulsion.if‘. ' 'i>' o! -Mi.' t<) / n i!h ! ylu ill il'u*- r'&r li. Because the report of the Wegener com¬mittee on disciplinary proceedures will notgo before the Council of the University Sen¬ate until later this week, the Council hasreaffirmed the legitimacy of past dis¬ciplinary action. SDS has no plans to continue the boycottbut the organization has said that they willuse the hearings to publicize their demandsfor free meals for cafeteria workers.SDS members began reporting to Ros-enwald 101 last week in order to make ap¬ pointments for preliminary hearings. Thefirst students will appear before dis¬ciplinary committee chairman Jo DeshaLucas November 25. All students are ex¬pected to attend the hearings, an SDSmember said.Conspiracy To Hold Sfomp for FundsThe Chicago Conspiracy is sponsoring astomp Friday at 8:30 pm at the AragonBallroom, 1106 W. Lawrence Avenue. Tick¬ets are on sale for $4, according to YippieMinister of Propaganda Mike Gold, throughTicket Central or at the door.The money is to be used for con¬spiratorial expense, including, said Gold,“a bribe for Judge Hoffman. We’ve learnedthat Hoffman sells for $50,000.” Goldclaimed that Conspiracy expenses for De¬cember would be $80,000, the bulk going tocopies of the trial transcript. The Con¬spiracy hopes to raise $10,000 through thestomp.Appearing will be Abbie Hoffman, thecast of “Hair,” Bob Gibson, Chad Mitchell,Jeff Carp, Hugh Romney and the HogFarm Bus, and the Fabulous Hypnotics, agroup, said Gold, “who played in Washing¬ton during the gassing. They were at theother end of the street.”“Unfortunately,” said Gold, “Yippie In¬ternational Leader Spiro Agnew will not bepresent. He will probably be out makinganother speech for us. However, in hisplace we will have, this day after Thanks¬giving, fifty liberated Turkeys.” CONSPIRACY RALLY: Defendants speak at aholding the microphone. Mike Brantrecent rally; David Dellinger isLaws Criticizes Her Early EvaluationCorrectionIn the article by Roger Black inFriday’s issue, the phrase beginningin the second column with“(evidently the word was out ...”through “be angry at him.” at the:op of column three should have fol¬lowed the sentence in the first col¬umn ending, “I was disoriented forabout two hours, trapped near theCapitol unable to get a cab or arid’.” Continued from Page Oneactivist but more of a liberal than a radi¬cal,” explained that the study of women is“an interest I’ve developed since I came tothis University, but one that is not consid¬ered a serious scholarly interest. , , , j,,.“That means it can’t be evaluated favor¬ably until the subject matter is established.Unfortunately for me all my new work is onwomen.” Mrs Laws has taught MBAcourses, advised PhD students from sev¬eral fields, and led graduate seminars insocial psychology.“I don’t know why they decided to eval¬uate me this fall,” the young social psy¬chologist said.“They (the evaluation committee) said‘We have an absolute standard of quality,unmatched at other schools, and you don’tmeasure up to it.’ ”When Mrs Laws asked for an example ofsomeone who met up to the standard only one year after getting their PhD, she said,she was given no name.Student evaluations were one basis of thedecision. Norman Bradbum, professor inthe business school, said that student can¬vassing in which professors pass out formsfor students to tabulate, was instituted win¬ter quarter last year, so that at the regularcourse load of two courses a quarter fourcourses could have been included in the ta¬bulation.The UWA said Thursday that only two ofthese classes were canvassed, and that fur¬thermore no women outside the businessschool working with Mrs Laws were con¬tacted. Also, no junior faculty were consulted inthe evaluation procedure, the UWA said, al¬though such consultation was recommend¬ed by the Gray committee last year.“What did the junior faculty say (whoare really my colleagues), and what did thestudents say?” Mrs Laws asked.Schools often make it difficult for womento choose between being a woman or ascholar, Mrs Laws felt.“One unmet need is role models for wom¬en who want to be serious scholars,” shesaid. “Where I went to school I had rolemodels, but no women.”TO ALL PARTICIPANTS INAUTUMN CONVOCATIONStudents graduating on December 12thmay be measured for caps and gownsat the Education Branch Bookstore,room 138, Betfield Hall, 5821 S. Kim-bark. The last day for ordering capsand gowns will be December 4th, Or¬ders sent by mail must be received atthe Bookstore by December 4th.All departments with members par¬ticipating in the Autumn Convocationon December 12th, should have capsand gowns requests on form #99 de¬livered to the Bookstore no later thanDecember 4th. Yon don't needinsuranceprotectionfor your car(if vou liveunder a rockand don'tplan to move).But if you do go out you’llwant auto insurance that’llreally protect you. YourSentry man wants to sitdown with you and helpplan your auto protection.Call him today.JIM CRANE238-0971tSENTRY.INSURANCEThe Hardware Mutuals Organizationf ’V w V MO .eg ¥ V 1 'id/* •« '• O’HARE CHRISTMASPUS SERVICEPICK UP AT YOURDOOR IN HYDE PARK!Operating DailyDECEMBER 10,11,12,13Our buses will pick you up at yourdoor in time for arrival at O'HareAirport at:8.00 A.M. 4 JO P.M.2:30 P.M. 6:30 P.M.ONE LOW FARE OF $3.50Tickets on sale atMOWAY TRAVEL SERVICEIN THE ADMINISTRATIONBUILDING LOBBYBuy now - Tickets must be pur¬chased no later than 12 Noon onday prior to departure.FULLY INSURED,RADIO-DISPATCHED BUSESPROVIDED BY WETZELTRANSPORTATION COMPANYCraig 212Reel RecorderBest BuyOnly$2995Craig CassetteRecorderBattery AC$39951342 E. 55th St. HY 3-9259 4 Groups of Students Plan to Settle inIsrael Between 1970 and 1973 in Kibbutzor Urban Collective. Hope to form com¬munities based on economic equality andsocial democracy.OPEN JOINT SEMINAR. JAN. 2-4CAMP AUGUSTINALAKE GENEVA, WISCONSINTransportation provided from Chicago $30for the seminar (food, transportationincluded)For more information write:I chad Habonim6022 N. Fair fieldChicagoOr call:Barbara Tell274-1011November 25, 1969/The Chicago Maroen/3OAtf ‘ vrv'* -« tM .' t '■’*VISA Helps Rehabilitate Mental PatientsBy Susan LeftA middle-aged man, unshaven, un¬combed, his feet in tennis shoes, wearing ashirt two sizes too large, paces endlesslyfrom one end of the room to the other. Anold woman rants to herself emotionallyabout being surrounded by crazy men. Ayoung man sits in a corner, totally silent,with no awareness that he is in a room withfifty other people.No, you are .not watching a scene fromBy Wendy GlocknerIn the continuing quest for “tenant pow¬er”, approximately seventy-five Hyde Parkresidents, including several students,united Friday evening to move an illegallyevicted resident back into her apartment.In the process, tenant union organizer andcon-con delegate A1 Raby was arrested fortrespassing.Sylvia Byrd, volunteer worker at theHyde Park Kenwood Community Confer¬ence (HPKCC) and tenant union organizer,had not received the county sheriff’s re¬quire :d “in-person” 48-hour eviction warant when she arrived home Friday eve¬ning and discovered her furniture on thestreet. A friend had earlier seen her eleven-year-old daughter “sitting on top of thetelevision set on the curb, reading a book.”Mrs Byrd had tried to organize her build¬ing some months ago, over code violationsand harrassment of tenants. At the sametime, she appeared in court for allegedlynot paying her rent. Although she presentedlegal proof that her rent was paid, MrsContinued from Page Onedents who participated in the recent Hut¬chinson Commons boycott. His motion saidthat SG will not cooperate in any way withthis disciplinary procedure and will not ap¬point any student observers. This motionwas approved by the assembly.The subject of faculty tenure procedurewas brought before the assembly. PeterKranz, a graduate student in geology toldthe. SG representatives that two facultymembers who have been politically activeand who sided with students during lastwinter’s sit-in have been denied tenure.Kranz suggested that the assembly passa motion which would express SG’s deepconcern “that issues raised last year by theevents of winter and spring quarters havenot been as adequately resolved as Univer¬sity authorities would have us believe.” Agroup of SG members agreed to sponsorthe resolution on behalf of Kranz, who isnot a member of the assembly.The motion, which was passed, does notpoint to any specific cases of tenure deci¬sions. However, it does claim that “there isevidence that political views remain a con¬sideration,” in the question of faculty posi¬tions. Marat de Sade. Scenes like these are justpart of the existence faced by many mentalpatients and former mental patients in Chi¬cago today. VISA (Volunteer InstitutionalService Activity) is an organization of Uni¬versity of Chicago students, graduate andundergraduate, who are involved with aid¬ing the rehabilitation of these present andformer mental patients. VISA has concen¬trated its efforts on Chicago State Hospital,the Clayton Hotel, which is a half-wayByrd quoted the judge as saying “I thinkshe should move out so she won’t be furtherharassed.” Since she did not recove thesheriff’s eaiction notice in person, however,(she received a handwritten warning butdoesn’t know its source); lawyers are ques¬tioning the city’s legal grounds for her evic¬tion.In fact, nobody in the apartment buildingeven saw the sheriff who allegedly came toevict her Friday, except the building jani¬tors recruited to move out her furniture,who described him as “wearing a bigbadge and carrying a long pistol.”Mrs Byrd found herself, her daughter andher furniture on the curb of 5118 DorchesterAvenue on a windy thirty degree Fridayevening. Several quick phone calls, how¬ever, also brought 75 residents and stu¬dents, three civil rights lawyers, andHPKCC tenant union organizers A1 Rabyand Bob Adams to her aid.While tenant union organizers, lawyers,and policemen (about six were present)disputed the legality of the eviction in thevestibule of the building, one tenant invitedThe problem of making appointments tothe Blum committee on student residencesand facilities was once again taken up bythe assembly at the Sunday evening meet¬ing. Barnett pointed out that SG had recom¬mended four students for the three open¬ings that SG was to fill. The administrationhas agreed to accept three SG recommen¬dations.The fourth student initially recommendedby SG, Gerard Leval, ’72, agreed to resign.His name has been submitted by the Inter-House Council as one of their recommenda¬tions to the Blum Committee, therefore hehas been appointed to that committee any¬way.The assembly decided that it would askone of the three students presently recom¬mended to withdraw in favor of a marriedgraduate student. Jonathan Dean was elect¬ed to be the third representative: a positionwhich he will assume as soon as it is de¬cided who is to withdraw.Just prior to adjournment, Frank Day,chairman of SG’s housing committee, re¬ported to the assembly that the tenantunion project had that evening successfullycompleted its first project. Earlier thisyear SG adopted this project as one of itsmajor programs. house, and the Thresholds, which is a work¬shop rehabilitation center. Members of thegroup leave by bus every Saturday after¬noon from Woodward Court and may go in¬dividually or in groups at other times dur¬ing the week.The purpose of VISA in general, is to aidin the rehabilitation of patients by bringingthem into contact with members of the out¬side community, creating with them ongo¬ing, meaningful interaction. With the helpthe concerned residents and students up toher apartment which legally preventedthem from being arrested for trespassing.After being kicked out of the vestibulemeeting — but staying long enough to heara policeman say “I’m just doing my job” —a Maroon reporter found the members ofthe community crowded into the apartmentupstairs. One student present commentedthat the atmosphere “was full of commu¬nity spirit.” A tenant union member consid¬ered the movement “a great step forwardin tenant power.” Eventually, all of MrsByrd’s furniture was moved into neighbor¬ing apartments. The Hyde Park TenantUnion Association, anticipating Mrs Byrd’seviction, had already found a temporaryplace where she and her daughter couldstay.Saturday morning, tenant union membersand concerned residents again met to pick¬et. After picketing at 5118 Dorchester forabout an hour, several cars arrived to takethe picketers to the residence of the ownerof the building William Walker, a doctorwho lives at 67 St and Oglesby, where theypicketed for four hours. One student de¬scribed the day as “cold. The companion¬ship was nice, but distinctly uncramatic.”Raby stated that the picketing was to“bring social pressure on this Hyde Parkslumlord, whom l heard \yas a fink any-Lawyers are still questioning the legalityof the case. Besides the question of the le¬gality of the eviction itself, lawyers are in-investigating the reasoning behind the evic¬tion. “If she has been evicted because she’strying to form a union,” said civil rightslawyer Gilbert Cornfield, “we can go tofederal court on infringement of rights.”KPKCC workers are organizing morepicket lines for this weekend. Organizersappear enthusiastic that their attempts willbe successful.THE CHICAGO M AROONEditor: Caroline HeckBusiness Manager: Emmet GonderManaging Editor: Mitch BobkinNews Editor: Sue LothPhoto Editors: Phil Lathrop, Steve AokiFeature Editor: Wendy GlocknerAssociate Editors: Con Hitchcock (Managing),Steve Cook (News), Chris Froula (Features),Mitch Kahn (Sports), Rob Cooley (Copy).Assistant Business Manager: Joel PondelikSenior Editor: Roger BlackStaff: Judy Alsofrom, Paul Bernstein, NancyChisman, Allen Friedman, Sarah Glazer, PeteGoodsell, Stan Goumas, Susan Left, GerardLeval, Joseph Morris, Tom Mossberg, EllenSazzman, Audrey Shalinsky, David Stee'e,John Stevens, Carl Sunshine.Photography Staff: Mike Brant, Steve Current,Richard Davis, Monty Futch, Ben Gilbert,Mark Israel, Jesse Krakauer, Jerry Levy,David Rosenbush, Paul Stelter.Founded in 1892. Pub¬lished by University ofChicago students daily dur¬ing revolutions, on Tues¬days and Fridays through¬out the regular schoolyear and intermittentlythroughout the summer,except during examinationperiods. Offices in Rooms303 and 304 in Ida Noyes Hall, 1212 E. 59thSt., Chicago, III. 60437. Phone Midway 3-0800,Ext. 3263. Distributed on campus and in theHyde Park neighborhood free of charge. Sub¬scriptions by mail $8 per year in the U.S. Non- iprofit postage paid at Chicago, III. Subscribers ito College Press Service. of the volunteer, the patient hopefully ex¬periences a renewed sensitivity toward oth¬ers and feels the warmth of another per¬son’s concern. ^John Peplinski, ’70, and the president ofVISA, explains that most of the patients arelonely, frightened, and poor. He says,“Through establishing a personal relation¬ship with the patient, the volunteer can usethat context to aid the patient in adjustingmore easily to social relationships. Very of¬ten a patient has been in Chicago State fortwenty or thirty years and he sits in a wardfull of people without any more inter-com¬munication than if he were alone. You canchart the effects of the institutional exis¬tence on the patients. They aren’t given re¬spect, so they don’t have self-respect, theybecome careless about their appearances,and may begin to steal or beg.”State Hospital Lacks StaffThis year about 15 VISA volunteers areworking on four wards in the hospital, threeadult wards and one children’s ward. Thewards have been infamous in the past forfilth, neglect, improper facilities, and anoverall oppressive atmosphere. VISA mem¬bers often do not even see any professionalstaff members while they are at the hospi¬tal, as the hospital generally provides verylittle therapy or individual attention topatients. However, most volunteers feelthat the basic problem with the staff facil¬ities is that the Hosptial is understaffed andthat the existing staff is overworked, morethan that the Hospital is poorly staffed.Some progress has been made recently,however. On one male ward the lone pro¬fessional psychologist for fifty or sixtypatients has introduced some efficient newprograms. The patients on this ward havebeen handcrafting strings for leather mon¬ey bags and earning money doing this.They have since become more conscious ofthe value of their own work and are givenfurther incentive to improve themselves bythe reward of moving to a better dormitorywith private rooms. Another innovation tocreate incentive is a dining table for thebetter patients where they jnay eat alongwitfi staff '*■**'*Sandy Paulsen, 71, who is in charge ofthe group that visits Chicago State, ex¬plains that conditions are still far fromideal. “Last week we arrived at our wardand realized that there was no electricityon in the whole hospital.”No Toys For KidsThe children’s ward has attracted thegreatest amount of attention from the Chi¬cago State volunteers. Janine Jason, 71,who heads this group, describes the wardas a totally undecorated dormitory with nowindows and no toys.“We’ve been told there are toys andgames for the children,” she explained,“but they are locked up in another part ofthe hospital and no one has bothered to getthem out yet. Before now the children werein a regular w rd, mixed with adultpatients and recei ed no special care. Herethe staff is better, but there aren’t enoughof them. These children are all mentallyretarded, as well as emotionally and psy¬chologically ill. They come from poorhomes and because of their former livesand their retardation they haven’t had theexperiences that most children of their agehave. There is nothing on which they canbase present and future experiences. Theyhave been hurt to the point where it’s oftenquestionable how much they will be able toreturn to the ‘normal’ world.”There are thirty-nine children in thisward. The average age is about ten. VISAmembers stress group activities with themto give them structure, approach them withindividual companionship, and haveplanned field trips and physical activities.Half-way House A Trap For SomeThe Clayton Hotel, where many ChicagoState patients move after their release, iswhere I have been working. “Although the¬oretically the people there are well becausethey have been discharged, they often aredismissed from the Hospital because it isovercrowded, so some of them can functiononly at a minimum level independently.Continued on Page Si*Steve AokiSTUDENT GOVERNMENT: The assembly discussed the faculty senate and dis¬cipline at they; meeting Sunday night.4/The Chicago Maroon/November 25, 1969 1Raby Arrested After Tenant EvictionSG Votes To Seat Observersrri M. 5i * t 1of V * r. *2 I ^a*. / , I * *4 « M ,<«*«* .*'Vlr *?-./• .V.,>.• f/i »,, i , A .5SI#■ Mof Chicago's Budget'ZStS^ * |1 2 f *WZi ifKJ H I wzn-I fifl iflm ■ ■ jg.WAITING: Lone bicycle stands parked outside Ryerson Laboratory.This is a special report to faculty, students,and other members of the University com¬munity on The University of Chicago’s an¬nual budget. It- analyzes the budget in somedetail and in addition makes a number ofobservations regarding the fiscal problemsof private higher education in general andThe University of Chicago in particular.The report was written by Ben Rothblatt,Assistant to the Provost. In view of thefinancial difficulties facing the University,the need for such a document seemed ob¬vious. I hope it will be read not only widelybut carefully as well.John T. Wilson, ProvostIn a letter to a colleague, written duringthe early years of the University’s exis¬tence, then President William Rainey Har¬per described his budget-making diffi¬culties in these words:... In the making out of the budget... agreat deal of time has been spent in con¬ferring with the various departments con¬cerning the reappointments for the nextyear. I wish you could have been in theoffice during some of the days. We are, ofcourse, carrying a good many people at arate which is just above that of star¬vation. Naturally enough these good peo¬ple feel that they can earn more anddeserve more. It has been my functionduring these days to persuade thesepeople that they are advancing the causeof science and serving the University. Ihave succeeded in most cases in showingthem the utter absurdity of being mer¬cenary; the sublimity of self-sacrifice ...Were he to return to the University to¬day, Mr. Harper would note with pleasurethe improved lot of the faculty, and he would find many other remarkablechanges. But he would have little difficultyin recognizing the task of budget making,still essentially as he described it in 1894.The art of budgetary planning in a pri¬vate university has been characterized by amore recent President of the University asa “subdivision of fortune-telling and witch¬craft.’’ To confirm the truth of this proposi¬tion one has only to conduct minorexcavations among the ruins of past Uni¬versity of Chicago plans, ranging from thedays of President Harper to much more re¬cent instances.Not all plans represent wasted effort.Before the University opened in 1892, Presi¬dent Harper embodied his dream of estab¬lishing a great university in a series of de¬tailed and carefully wrought documentsincorporating his plans and their financialrequirements, and much of this dream hassubsequently become reality. But buildingthe University has been a constantstruggle, and no little part of the struggleBudget planning is, in verysimple terms a question of moneyand its effective utilization inachieving desired goals . . .has been financial. Harper’s letters andmemoranda are poignant reminders of theproblems. Could he raise money to build adormitory? Would funds be forthcoming tohire an eminent professor to build a newThis supplement to the Maroonhas been prepared and paid for bythe University’s Office of Public In¬formation. department? This aspect of university lifehas changed little. The rhetoric is perhapsmore subdued, but the sums are now muchlarger.Budget planning is, in very simple terms,a question of money and its effective utili-But building the University hasbeen a constant struggle, and nolittle part of the struggle has beenfinancial.zation in achieving desired goals: how tosupport the primary functions of the Uni¬versity — teaching and the discovery ofnew knowledge — and how to decide on thebest use of available funds for carrying onthese functions. All of this is in the face ofgrowing demands on the University to per¬form still more tasks, which, in effect,means diverting resources from teachingand research to other purposes.The goals and functions of the Universityand the way that the University proposes tofulfill these functions are thus reflected inone of the University’s basic planning docu¬ments, the annual budget. The 1969-70 bud¬get of The University of Chicago is a mim¬eographed document, an inch and a quarterthick. It specifies in detail the incomewhich the University hopes to receive inthis academic year and projects in equallyminute detail the distribution of these fundsover that same period. Although the bud¬get, dealing as it does with approximationsof reality, is a form of fiction, it is on thewhole deficient in literary value. Much ofthe language it contains is derived from fis¬cal custom and strikes the general readqr..as archaic and quaint, perhaps mysterious. It may be possible to dispel at least some ofthis mystery and a few of the myths associ¬ated with it. One ci these is the University’s“great wealth.” Another is the related fan¬tasy that the University has a balancedbudget.A budget projects the distribution of re¬sources over a period of time, usually oneyear. It is a planning document in the sensethat it plans the allocation of funds not yetreceived for specific future activities. Thebudget is sometimes mistakenly perceivedas a policy document. It reflects policy but{ JOHN T WILSON ^ , ,...University Provostdoes not set policy. If it did, that wouldmean that the availability of certain fundsdetermined what the University ought todo. On the contrary, the budget proceedsfrom a prior determination of goals andpolicy. It is thus a link between the finan¬cial resources of the University — its assetsand a set of expectations of income — andthe kinds of activities required to performthe University’s functions.Making the annual budget occupies thebetter part of a year and the energies ofmany people. The first part of this processinvolves predicting the amount of incomethat will be available in the coming fiscalyear (beginning July 1); the second partconsists of allocating funds based on thisestimate. Total income is the aggregate ofstudent fees, income from endowment; in¬i' >• *•< i <-t » i * rti tJt •»'?‘r.l2/Public Information Supplement/November 25, 1969come from patients in the hospitals, privategifts and foundation grants, governmentcontracts and grants, auxiliary enterprises,and sundry income. Estimates are based ondata received from deans of the variousacademic areas, the Dean of Students, theTreasurer, and other administrative offi¬cers. These estimates are of varying relia¬bility; some in fact are highly uncertain.And since much of the income can be spentonly for special purposes, this fact mustalso be taken into account. Simultaneouslywith predictions of income, estimates of ex¬penditures also come from the divisionsand schools, as well as business and servicedepartments.From combined estimates of anticipatedincome and expenditures, a preliminarybudget level is arrived at. Since the budget should balance, the income and expendituretotals are identical. When the total planningfigure has been derived, after it has beenpresented by the President to the Board ofTrustees for approval, each area of theUniversity is given a tentative allocation tobe used in making its own detailed budget.These sub-budgets are then submitted andover a period of about two months are fur¬ther refined — not infrequently involvingthe kind of interaction so well described byMr. Harper. After final adjustments havebeen made in unit budgets, the Comptrollerconstructs a consolidated budget to be sub¬mitted to the Board of Trustees in April.Approval by the Trustees means that thebudget is now official for the coming aca¬demic year, and that all the units of theUniversity are committed to bot£. attempt¬ ing to fulfill predictions of income and liv¬ing within allocations of expenditures. (SeeFigure 1.)Three general observations may put thisbrief (and necessarily oversimplified) de¬scription of the budgetary process in sharp¬er focus. For one thing, many people areinvolved in the making of the budget andthe final figures are arrived at on the basisof full discussion on the part of all partici¬pants. Secondly, the budget is an aggre¬gate, a collection of sub-budgets of thevarious University divisions, schools, andnonacademic departments, which in turnare aggregate budgets of further subunits,such as academic departments.A third point is that the area of discretionis extremely limited. This year’s budget is,11 t$160 Million EffortUniversity has a planned deficit of over $9million, accompanied by the hope that suf¬ficient gift money can be raised to meetthis deficit. Listing this item as “gifts ap¬plied” allows the University to have abudget which, on paper, appears balanced.But underlying this euphemism is aplanned deficit of more than $9 million.If gift money sufficient to cover theplanned deficit is realized and if predictionsof income are fulfilled, the University willbe able to operate within its budget. Butmany of the University’s needs are not pro¬vided for by the operating budget, andthese needs can be met only by gifts far inexcess of the amount required to balancethe budget. Additional funds are urgentlyneeded for the construction of new facilitiesand the renovation of older ones, for in¬creased financial aid to students, and to strictly academic costs amount to 61 percent of total expenditures, or about $85.7million. The Hospitals and Clinics, pre-collegiate education, and the Industrial Re¬lations Center will spend nearly $25 million.Maintenance and operation of the physicalplant and the cost of business operations(nearly $10 million) bring the total to about86 per cent of the budget. Auxiliary enter¬prises account for nearly $17 million (12 percent of the budget) and this sum is nearlyoffset by income. All that remains is theless than 1 per cent of the budget requiredfor the cost of general administration andthe 1.5 per cent for development — the costof generating the gifts that will produce abalanced budget, including the operationsof the Public Information Office, theAlumni Association, and Radio and Tele¬vision, as well as the Office of Devel¬opment.BETWEEN CLASSES: Students, faculty, and staff encounter one another in thelobby of the School of Social Service Administration.necessarily, a revision of last year’s bud¬get. Most funds are committed;-facultymembers have contracts, nearly alwayslonger than one year, many of them life¬time. Buildings exist and must be heated,lighted, and maintained. Pressures forsalary increments continue; nonacademicsalaries in many categories, for example,are determined by prior contracts. The costof materials and services increases. TTiuseven though the total budget rises eachyear, a large proportion of that increase iscommitted to simply maintaining the gen¬eral increase in the cost of living. Verylittle remains to make dramatic improve¬ments in particular areas, let alone to un¬dertake new obligations.In 1969-70, the total operating budget ofThe University of Chicago is $139,500,032,an increase of more than $11 million overlast year. This figure represents projec¬tions of both total revenues and total ex¬penditures for the overall operation of theUniversity. Following are the major cate¬gories of estimated revenue: $23 million(about 17 per cent) should come from stu¬dent fees. Approximately $21 million shouldcome from patient fees in the UniversityHospitals and Clinics. The largest singleportion, providing 29 per cent of income(about $41 million), should come from gov¬ernment sources. These funds are for spe¬cific research projects, with the largestsegment (more than $15 million) ear¬marked for the support of work in the biolo¬gical sciences. Investment income from theUniversity’s endowment funds should total$11.6 million, about 8 per cent of total Uni¬versity income. Other income of nearly $16million, much of it from private founda¬tions and two-thirds of it designated forspecific research and educational activi¬ties, should amount to 11 per cent. Twelveper cent ($16.5 million) should be producedby the University dormitories, apartments,dining halls, the University Press, theBookstore, and other so-called “auxiliary enterprises.” This is $357,700 less than theamount required to operate these enter¬prises. Finally, if the budget is to balance,$9.3 million must come from unrestrictedgifts — that is, gifts which may be appliedto operating expenses, as opposed to giftsfor buildings or other specific purposes. An¬other way of putting this is to say that the If gift money sufficient to coverthe planned deficit is realized andif predictions of income are ful¬filled, the University will be ableto operate within its budget.provide matching funds for governmentand foundation grants. Further restrictedfunds are also needed to finance importantnew academic programs over a period ofyears, as well as to continue support ofsome programs whose original funding bygrants was for a finite period of time. Stillmore funds must be raised and added tothe endowment, so that earnings may keeppace with rising costs. (See Figure 2.)Since income, with good fortune, willamount to $139,500,032, it is exactly thatsum which the University can plan tospend. This is approximately how it will bespent: about 50 per cent of the funds (69million) will go for instruction and re¬search, which for the most part means fac¬ulty salaries as well as salaries of researchassociates, secretaries, and other support¬ing staff. Add to this library costs($3,758,000), student services (over $2 mil¬lion), and student aid (nearly $11 million —over $4 million of which is from govern¬ment and foundation sources), and the The income and expenditures figures justcited are those of the so-called ConsolidatedBudget. This budget includes income andexpenditures from government contractsand restricted funds, in addition to fundsfor the regular, ongoing functions of theUniversity which are not specifically sup¬ported. These restricted funds from bothgovernment and private sources are of vi¬tal importance to the University.In the coming year, restricted funds willprovide nearly $5 million in student aid. Inaddition, research contracts and grants of¬fer numerous employment opportunities forgraduate students, providing invaluable re-If restricted grants were notavailable, research in many areaswould have to be curtailed . . .search experience and training as well asfinancial support. A major share of the costof new construction is provided by restrict¬ed gifts and grants not included in thebudget. One example is the Regenstein Li¬brary, now under construction, which willmeet a longstanding need for a graduateresearch library in the humanities and so¬cial sciences. The new library, to be com¬pleted in 1970, will house over 3 millionConsolidated Budget: Revenues and Expenditures, 1969-70Revenues (Estimated)A. General Funds (Unrestricted)Student fees $ 20.291.000Endowment income . 8,859,000Sundry income 5,753.361Indirect cost allowance 6,200,000Gifts applied 9,327,618Total $ 50,430,979B RestrictedEndowment income $ 2,757,000Government contracts and grants 34,940.000Other 10,088.000Total $ 47.785,000C. Academic Auxiliary EnterprisesStudent fees: percollegiate $ 2.709,000Endowment income: precollegiate 16.000Income from patients:Hospitals and Clinics 20.953.053Gifts and fees:Industrial Relations Center 1.100,000Total $ 24,778,053D. Auxiliary EnterprisesHousing and food services 3.840.000International House 742,000Center for Continuing Education 977.000University Press 7.404,500Miscellaneous activities 3.542.500Total $ 16.506.000E. Consolidated Revenues(Total of A, B. C, D) $139,500,032’Reprinted from THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO RECORD, Expenditures (Appropriated)A. General Funds (Unrestricted)Instruction and research $ 26.973,211Library 3.300.000Student services 2.179.790Physical properties operation 6,676.100General administration 862,350Development expense 1.900.000Business operations 3,158,900Student aid 5.875.000Staff benefits 108.000Estimated vear-old savings) (1.050.000)Total $ 49.983.351B RestrictedInstruction and research $ 42.191.000Library 485.000Student services 54.000Physical properties operation 15.000General administration 140.000Student aid 4.900.000Total $ 47.785.000C. Academic Auxiliary EnterprisesPrecollegiate $ 2.814.928Hospitals and Clinics 20.953.053Industrial Relations Center 1.100.000Total $ 24.867.981D. Auxiliary EnterprisesHousing and food services 4.373,700International House 742.000Center for Continuing Education 977.000University Press 7.214.500Miscellaneous activities 1.437.500Total $ 16.863.700E. Consolidated Expenditures(Total of A.B.C.D) $139,500,032Volume III, Number 10, available 3Iter December 1, 1W. 5LlIe><i-2LlJOCTLUQ_1959 I960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 -1967 ,..1968., 1969• n» nt hvt« vftRrtor*#rj«**l ?.«n »«—•*-< — - <. •, ., ?, *!'odG o* Jnuonte Muona ^quin:Percentage of Endowment Income to Total Income (Excluding Argonne National Laboratory) (Figure 4)Report Shows University's 'Great Wealth’ Is a Mythbooks and periodicals, using the newestmethods of electronic information retriev¬al; it will seat 2,260 students and providestudy space for 250 faculty members. Thelibrary will cost $20 million. After an initialgift of $300,000 from the Harriet PullmanSchermerhom Charitable Trust, a $10 mil¬lion gift rfom the Joseph and Helen Regen-stein Foundation enabled construction tobegin in 1967. Further gifts included a grantof $3,410,772 from the federal government.But still to be raised is the sum of $6,500,-000, in addition to funds needed for mainte¬nance.Beyond student aid and funds for con¬struction, restricted gifts and grants makepossible a broad spectrum of important re¬search activities in many fields. All areprojects that individual faculty memberswish to do and that faculty committees inthe divisions and schools have initiallyscreened and then endorsed. Grants for re¬search projects in which faculty have notalready expressed interest are not acceptedby the University. If restricted grants werenot available, research in many areaswould have to be curtailed, thus limitingresearch opportunities for students as wellas faculty. Some would go on in any casebut would require the use of funds now freefor other purposes.Since government and other restrictedfunds are self-balancing (that is, ex¬penditures are controlled by income avail¬able through grants, contracts, and otherfunds restricted to specific purposes), theytend to distort the picture of the Univer¬sity’s financial situation. A clearer viewcan be produced by looking at the GeneralFunds Budget.If government and other restricted fundsand auxiliary enterprises were not includ¬ ed, 1969-70 expenditures would be just un¬der $75 million (compared to $139.5 millionon the Consolidated Budget). Further de¬ducting expenditures for the Hospitals andClinics and the Industrial Relations Center(which operate on a self-balancing basis)and precollegiate education (which doesnot) reduces the expenditure budget toslightly under $50 million. This is the Gen¬eral Funds Budget. In one sense it repre¬sents the basic University budget —stripped of all government contracts, fundsrestricted to special purposes, and activi¬ties in which expenditures are for the mostpart dependent upon, and equal to, income.It is this basic budget which does not bal¬ance, producing the planned deficit in thecurrent year of over $9 million — a deficitwhich must be covered by $9 million in un¬restricted gifts. Additional government con¬tracts and other restricted gifts and grantswould do nothing to make up this deficitunless they were for activities already in¬cluded in the budget. This year’s planneddeficit is about $1 million greater than lastyear’s and $2 million larger than theplanned deficit of two years ago. AlmostIt seems a paradox that this ap¬parently wealthy institution mustbegin each year with a planneddeficit of such magnitude.inevitably the deficit will rise each year.(See Figure 3.)So much then for the myth of the bal¬anced budget.To return to what was described as the“myth of the University’s great wealth.”As universities go, The University of Chi¬cago is often considered to be among thewealthiest. Its endowment, with a market value of about $327 million, is exceeded insize by those of only four or five Americanprivate universities. Its physical plant cost$177 million and would probably cost abouttwice that amount to duplicate. Its facultysalaries are very nearly the highest in thenation. Its tuition, although not the highest,is in the top range. It seems a paradox thatthis apparently wealthy institution must be¬gin each year with a planned deficit of suchmagnitude.It is relatively easy to see that the Uni¬versity’s physical plant, valuable as it isand necessary as it is to carry on the Uni¬versity’s activities, is not a financial assetin the sense that it does not produce fundsfor operating purposes. In fact, operatingand maintaining the University’s buildingsand equipment will cost about $10 millionthis year. The physical plant, therefore,consumes funds; it does not produce them.The University operating budget providesno funds for capital construction; nor doesit provide for depreciation on buildings, ex¬cept in the case of the Hospitals and Clin¬ics. Long-range facilities needs are oftendifficult to anticipate. New fields developGifts Budgeted to SupportGeneral Operations (Figure 3)Year Amount1960-61 $1,890,0001961-62 1,797,0001962-63 1,908,0001963-64 2,588,0001964-65 3,000,0001965-66 4,526,0001966-67 .... 6,441,0001967-68 7,613,0001968-69 8,397,0001969-70 9,328,000 and require new equipment and facilities.Not too long ago few could have predictedthe need for a space sciences laborr ory ora computation center, much less for ? facil¬ity for electronic music. Other needs weremore predictable but difficult to satisfy.Years ago, for example, it was recognizedthat the old Law School Building, once thevery best of its kind, had become seriouslyinadequate. Yet from the time of that real¬ization, it took twenty-five years before anew Law School could be built.The backlog of needed construction isconsiderable. These needs range from therenovation of older student residence halls,the remodeling of Harper Library, and theIf all currently planned construc¬tion projects were built, they wouldcost an estimated $100 million, notincluding all projects approved andfunded.construction of a new bookstore to suchprojects as the Student Village, new teach¬ing and research facilities for the Biologic¬al Sciences, and a new music building. Ifall currently planned construction projectswere built, they would cost an estimated$100 million, not including projects alreadyapproved and funded. All projects will haveto be deferred until funds can be found.Some will never be realized. Others are im¬mediately needed — for example, renova¬tion required for compliance with citybuilding codes.Even if depreciation funds could be pro¬vided, they would likely be inadequate. Al¬though the Hospitals and Clinics do havedepreciation funds, there is now, for ex¬ample, an urgent need for new operatingrooms, which the University has thus farbeen unab’e to finance. To meet buildingneeds of Various kinds, therefore, capital44/Public Information Supplement/November 25, 1969CHAPEL: Stained glass windows filter the sunlight that brightens the sanctuary of Rockefeller Chapel Can endowments and endowment incomebe generated at a pace equal to the rise inNovember 25, 1969/Public Information Supplement/5Tuition Is Failing To Keep Pace with Costsgifts over and above the needs of the budg¬et are essential. Otherwise, to meet itsmost pressing construction needs, the Uni¬versity may have to draw on unrestrictedgifts. But these funds may be used only ifthey are not needed for current operatingexpenditures.Cobb Hall is another case in point. Theoriginal classr ,m building on the Qua¬drangles and a fine example of Neo-Gothicarchitecture, it had served for years as thecentral undergraduate teaching facility.Deterioration over the years, as well as itsinadequacy for new undergraduate needs,ultimately rendered it totally useless. Final¬ly it was completely rebuilt, preservingonly its exterior, at a cost of about $2 5million. Gifts and a grant produced about$1.6 million; the remainder had to be takenfrom unrestricted funds that might other¬wise have bee n used to support the budget.What of the endowment? Can these fundsbe drawn upon to make up deficits, to ex¬pand existing activities, and to support newventures? Unhappily, this is not the case.The endowment is not income. It is asource of income. In 1968-69, the investmentincome produced by endowment was justover $11 million, and of that amount $8.6million was unrestricted, available for gen¬eral purposes. This income from endow¬ment provides a vitally necessary part ofThe University cannot spend en¬dowment funds—even those whichlegally may be spent—without re¬ducing future income essential tosupport of the annual budget.the operating budget of the University. But,although endowment income usually in¬creases from year to year, it in fact repre¬sents a proportinately smaller annual shareof the University’s total income. In 1900 en¬dowment fund earnings paid 25 per cent ofthe total costs of higher education in theUnited States; by the late 1950s the figurewas 5 per Tent. In the cufreftt year endow-'ment earnings should amount to about 8per cent of this University’s revenues. TheUniversity cannot spend endowment funds— even those which may legally be spent —without reducing future income essential tosupport of the annual budget. (See Figure4.)This is why the myth of the University’sgreath wealth is indeed a myth. The Uni¬versity cannot spend the endowment with¬out grave consequences. It cannot use re¬stricted funds for other purposes. It cannever be certain of having enough money to REFLECTIONS: Botany building and tree are seen in the reflection of botany pond.operate. Predictions of income are esti¬mates, by their very nature highly uncer¬tain. This is especially true of gifts, whichfluctuate from year to year. Increasinglythis uncertainty applies to income in othercategories as well. The University has al¬ways lived with such uncertainty and in¬deed has gone through several periods ofgreat financial stress. At the same time ithas traditionally used its resources to themaximum. (See Figure 5.)Chicago’s financial situation is notunique; to a greater or lesser degree it isshared by all universities, public and pri¬vate. Put in the language of the economist,the problem is essentially this: the price of“inputs” or “service” keeps rising while“productivity” remains constant. In in¬dustry the situation is quite different;wages have been rising steadily, but so hasproductivity, largely because of tech¬nological advances. As long as output perhour increases along with wages the cost of a product can remain about the same. Incontrast, although salaries in educationhave been rising, the teaching output perfaculty man hour has remained the same.Technological progress has not made it pos¬sible for fewer faculty members to teachmore students in less time. Nor will it, un¬less the character of the University is to besignificantly altered in the direction ofmore mechanical means of instruction,larger classes, and thus greater imperso¬nality. Therefore, the unit cost of theeducational “product,” which has gone up,is likely to continue to rise. There seems noescape from this fact. It is unlikely thatthere will ever be an acceptable substituefor face to face instruction. Although itmight be possible to make some reductionin formal class time, such a step wouldprobably be accompanied by increases inother “inefficient” methods, such as groupand individual tutorials. “Efficiency”would mean larger classes and fewer courses offered.The steady rise in academic salaries isnot the only factor which has contributed torising costs. Research has increased inboth quantity and complexity. Much of it isvery expensive, requiring sophisticated sci¬entific equipment, costly computers, andexpanded library service. Some, but not all,of these costs are provided by governmentgrants, many of which require the Univer¬sity to supply matching funds. In addition,universities — at considerable cost — havemoded into new academe fields, such asA by-product of advancingknowledge is the increased cost oftraining graduate students.non-Western studies, information science,and new aspects of biology. A byproduct ofadvancing knowledge is the increased costof training graduate students. Communityproblems and responsibilities have alsoclaimed an increased share of universityfunds. These are among the factors whichaccount for the phenomenal growth in uni¬versity budgets in recent years. In the lasttwenty years, Chicago’s budget has quin¬tupled, while over the same period enroll¬ments have risen less than 10 per cent.Given the fact of rising costs and rulingout the possibility of increasing educationalproductivity by, for example, greatly ex¬panding class size, what are the possi¬bilities for financial viability? Can incomebe increased sufficiently to offset risingcosts?Tuition has been increasing at a fairlysharp rate, but these increases have notkept pace with increased cost per student.In addition, tuition increases have been ac¬companied by a spectacular increase in therate of student aid; the net increase fromstudent fees has therefore been smallerthan it appears. In any case, it would bemost difficult to raise tuition sufficiently tocover the actual of education, in light of thefact that at The University of Chicago theaverage annual cost per student, withoutreference to capital costs, is currentlyabout $5,500, well over twice tuition. In cer¬tain fields the cost per student is now esti¬mated to be nearly $15,000 a year. Accord¬ing to a recent study by one leading econo¬mist, per student cost is rising to the an¬nual rate of 7.5 per cent.HELPING HAND: Member of the Student Woodlawn Tutoring Project (SWAP)helps neighborhood youth understand school subject during study session inIda Noyes Hall.costs? Recent experience indicates other¬wise; the rise in endowment has not keptpace and neither has the increase in in¬come from endowment, even though someuniversities, including this one, have begunto adopt more aggressive (and thereforemore risky) investment policies in an effortto increase long-run capital gains from en¬dowment. Since this policy might mean lessendowment income in the short run, theBoard of Trustees has approved spending aportion of net capital gains from endow¬ment funds. Funds in an amount sufficientto maintain the normal return on in¬vestments would be used, thus providingboth current income and the necessary fi¬nancial stability in the interim period.Can gifts from individuals and founda¬tions be accelerated? For the most part,gifts to the University are year by year.But much of this gift money is for restrict¬ed purposes, and some gifts carry withthem additional obligations, as, for ex¬ample, funds which pay for only part of anew building and provide no funds for oper-In the last 20 years, Chicago'sbudget has quintupled, while overthe same period enrollments haverisen less than 10 per cent.ating and maintenance costs; or a chair fora new distinguished professor, withoutfunds to increase his salary in the future orto provide him with an office and secretar¬ial help. At the same time, the competitionfor gift money grows more intense, not onlyfrom other universities but also from otherkinds of agencies with urgent social pur¬poses.Another source of funds is, of course,government. Federal funds have supportedan increasingly large share of universitywork, mainly research, in the last twentyyears or so; but this support has begun tolevel off, again in the face of pressing na¬tional priorities. Public universities havesome assurance of rising support. In fact,unlike a private university, a state, univer¬sity can produce a long-range plan for, say,a multi-million-dollar building programwith reasonable confidence that it will ulti¬mately come to fruition. This is not true forThe University of Chicago or for other pri¬vate institutions. It would not be at all diffi¬cult for The University of Chicago to state its needs in the form of a legislativerequest. But private universities neithermake such requests, nor do they receivestate appropriations. Recognizing the spe¬cial financial problems of private univer¬sities, as well as their unique contributionsto their regions, some states have begun toexplore the possibility of making directgrants to private universities, and at leastone has already instituted a program of di¬rect grants. In this state, recommendationsfor direct grants and other financial assis¬tance were recently made by the Commis¬sion to Study Non-Public Higher Educationin Illinois.Projecting from recent trends in all ofthe major income categories — tuition,gifts, endowment income, and governmentgrants — the future looks bleak. Whateverincreases one can anticipate from thesesources will fall far short of increases inexpenditures. And as time goes on the gapbetween income and expenditures will growwider. This is the essence of the growingfinancial dilemma of the private university.Various solutions have been proposed,ranging from increased efficiency in uni¬versity operations, to greater governmentsupport, to placing more of the financialburden on the students. On this latter viewit is argued that students benefit financiallyfrom education and therefore should pay its“real costs.” Among the means proposedare long-term government supported loansat low interest rates. Another proposal,based on the theory that the country as awhole benefits at least as much as individu¬al students, is that the federal governmentAccording to a recent study byone leading economist, per studentcost is rising at the annual rate of7.5 per cent.should increase its support of higher educa¬tion by making direct grants to universitiesfor operating expenses. These might takethe form of supplemental “cost of educa¬tion” grants for each student. Some moresanguine prophets believe that universitiescould effect economies in their operationsand could by greater efficiency reduce defi¬cits significantly.All these proposals have some merit. But Educational Quality Highgreatly increased government support willnot be available in the immediate futureand may not be sufficient to meet the need.Nor are long-term guaranteed loans for stu¬dents on the immediate horizon, not tomention outright subsidies for studentsunable to borrow. Finally, although univer¬sities are undoubtedly capable of makingsome economies in their operation (as aremost large organizations), major reduc¬tions in expenditures would necessarily in¬volve lowering educational standards andcurtailing some academic activities.Maintaining the educational quality of theUniversity in the face of rising costs andmounting deficits is therefore a problem ofthe greatest magnitude. It is not likely tobe solved soon, perhaps ever. Lowering thequality of education is unacceptable, evenas a short-run measure, and cutting backon academic activities could lead to a gen¬eral decline which would be not only rapidbut irreversible.Recognizing this problem, the Universityseveral years ago made an extensive studyof its needs and resources. Faculty mem¬bers, administrative officers, and trusteesparticipated in this two-year analysis, inwhich deans and department chairmenstated academic priorities for the ten-yearperiod 1965-75. On the basis of the informa¬tion assembled, it was concluded that aprogram designed to improve all aspects ofthe University’s academic life would re¬ quire $1.4 billion in the ten-year period,with income estimated at just over $1 bil¬lion. leaving a gap of $360 million.As the first phase of a ten-year programto raise the $360 million, the University em¬barked on the Campaign for Chicago withthe goal of $160 million over a three-yearperiod. Of this amount $88.2 million was tobe for building needs,$52.3 million for pro¬gram support for the budget, and $19.5 mil¬lion to be added to endowment.At the initial stage of the Campaign theUniversity sought a challenge grant fromthe Ford Foundation, presenting its plansand projections for the decade in support ofthe request. Noting that “Chicago is ex-Projecting from recent trends inall of the major income categories—tuition, gifts, endowment income,and government grants — the fu¬ture looks bleak.periencing a renaissance as one of theworld’s leading universities,” the FordFoundation awarded its maximum chal¬lenge grant of $25 million to the University.The grant required matching donations of$75 million.The three-year campaign reached its $160million goal in December, 1968, thus con¬founding those experts who had predictedthat it could not possibly succeed. DuringGifts, Grants, and Bequests, by Purpose1965-69 (Millions of Dollars) (Figure 5)General UnrestrictedFord Foundation Challenge Grant. — v *+■>**> ..«■ - - ■# -- •J|l General Restricted , Loan, and Annuity35-r- Endowment [ | Plant6/Public Information Supplement/November 25, 1969Use of Many Gifts, Grants Restrictedthe three-year period the University greatlystrengthened its faculty, increased annualstudent aid by nearly $4 million, launchedseveral significant new academic pro¬grams, and made substantial headway to¬ward meeting its building needs. In somerespects, however, the Campaign fell short for immediate needs were in relativelyshort supply, and much of the underwritingof current operations has come from theunrestricted funds provided by the Fordchallenge grant, whose other great contri¬bution was to stimulate gifts from othersources. The full amount of gifts eligible to serve as matching funds for the Ford grantwas realized in the summer of 1969, and thelast payment of the Ford grant will bemade in the current academic year. TheUniversity, therefore, faces the problem for1970-71 and beyond of finding other funds toprovide budget support for current oper-a..iwuiiueu goal ior Duiiding funds was at¬tained; capital needs are therefore stillenormous. A considerable portion of Cam¬paign funds pledged and received are forlong-range or other future programs andcannot be immediately put to use. FundsRAIN: Two women stroll on rain-covered sidewalk in front of Cobb Hall.November 25, 1969/Public Information Supplement/7' J*,'|4if: JjAb.iissh 'RADIO: Engineer in the control room ofcampus radio station WHPK-FM manipu¬lates controls for conversation programgoing on in studio.FALL: Sunlight filters through the autumn leaves outside Wiebolt nan. ations, in addition to raising the largeamounts needed for buildings and to fulfillthe academic goals of the ten-year pro¬gram.This University s perhaps more fortu¬nate than most. It has reached a level ofhigh distinction in its faculty and studentsand has wide support for its efforts. ThisLowering the quality of educa¬tion is unacceptable, even as ashort-run measure, and cuttingback on academic activities couldlead to a general decline whichwould be not only rapid but ir¬reversible.fervent and intense. He informed the Lordand Rockefeller of the financial plight ofthe University and respectfully asked theLord for help. Help came, of course — fromMr. Rockefeller. “Whether true or not,” alater President of the University remarked,“there is a lot of history in that story.”In some respects, however, thecampaign fell short of its programgoals.support has come to the University not be¬cause of its weakness but because of itsacademic strength. And the uses of finan¬cial support have reflected the University’sacademic goals, with the highest budgetarypriorities given to faculty salaries, studentaid, and library needs. But to survive, as aleading university, Chicago must resisttemptations to expand recklessly or to oth¬erwise misuse its resources. The test forthe University will be to continue to do itsown work well.Meanwhile the struggle for financialequilibrium will go on much as it has in thepast. The story is told, perhaps apocryphal-ly, of one of William Rainey Harper’s visitsto John D. Rockefeller. Harper had beenmake up the year-end deficit,as he had been doing for several years. In¬stead Harper suggested that they begintheir visit with a prayer, since they wereboth religious men. Harper’s prayer wasThis support has come to theUniversity not because of its weak¬nesses but because of its academicstrength.APPENDIXFinancial HighlightsExpenditures for total operations, excluding Argonne 1968-69 1958-59 1948-49National Laboratory $135,488,000 $ 50,811,000 $23,783,000Expenditures for general funds (unrestricted) 47,445,000 19,399,000 12,282,000Federal funds for designated current expenditures 41,438,000 10,817,000 5,340,000Student aid, including loans and deferred tuition 19,962,000 3,205,000 1,061,000Student fees 21,908,000 6,778,000 5,455,000Patient fees 22,807,000 10,903,000 4,299,000Gifts used for current operations:Restricted 10,688,000 4,970,000 1,496,000Unrestricted 6,571,000 2,501,000 2,334,000Gifts for plant, endowment, loan, and annuity funds — 11,935,000 4,521,000 1,666,000Earnings of endowment funds 12,948,000 7,799,000 3,940,000Market value of endowment 326,740,000 210,318,000 86,395,000Book value of endowment 233,050,000 133,048,000 71,317,000Book value of plant and equipment 117,066,000 81,034,000 52,863,000■ ■ ■ • i n i <i t <* : y • v.-t i -8/Public Information Supplement/November 25, 1969•rrcr: rnn -vti:■ jjjoe*jrrrttrrrrjnrrrjrrrrTKrrmrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrmrrrrn-rv; rn jtr r ,vr; -a 11: l: 1 1 I t I ( V1*i l«i«i ' Jk!11 fHillel SymposiumThe 24th annual Latke-Hamartash sym¬posium, sponsored by the University’sB’nai B’rith Hillel foundation, will be heldTuesday at 7 p.m. in the Cloister Club inIda Noyes Hall.This year’s topic is “Latke orthodoxy vs.Hamantash Revisionism: a confrontation oftwo revolutionary ideologies. It is describedas “an effort at a Jewish institute of de¬fense analysis dealing with the Jewish me¬taphysical, gastronomic, and cultural con¬tributions to the defense of the Americancivilization and defense of the University.”Participants will include Howard Aron¬son, professor of Slavic languages, NormanGelfand, professor of physics, Rev. AndrewGreeley, Donald Levine, associate profes¬sor of sociology, and Judith Weintraub, pro¬fessor of English at the University of D-linois Circle campus.Stagg BowlTwo new NCAA football bowl games willbe held this year, one in honor of formerUniversity great football coach AmosAlonzo Stagg, the other in honor of formerNotre Dame coach Knute Rockne.These bowls will settle supremacy of Col¬lege Division (II) teams. These teams arefrom the small colleges in the NCAA’s foot¬ball division. TTie eastern region which willcompete in the Rockne bowl include NewEngland, New York, Pennsylvania, NewJersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia,West Virginia, and North Caroliiv.i. The re¬ mainder of the country teams is in thewestern region, and they will compete inthe Stagg bowl.Stagg had more victories than any othercollege coach, winning 314 games atSpringfield College, College of the Pacific,and here.New GrantsThree grants totaling $433,928 have beenmade to the University by the NationalAeronautics and Space Administration(NASA) for studies of cloud composition,cosmic radiation, and the origin, age, andcomposition of meteorites.The department of health, education andwelfare (HEW) has designated the centerfor study of welfare policy at the Universityas one of three regional research institutesto study social welfare. The center is partof the school for social service adminis¬tration (SSA) and will receive a $75,000grant to study welfare policy.Howlin' WolfBlues lovers saddened by the cancellationof Revitalization’s November 15 Howlin’Wolf concert — because the 60-year old mu¬sician, Chester Burnett, had a heart attackon the way to the performance — may takeheart from the progress report issued byIllinois Central Hospital, 5800 S Stony Is¬land Avenue. “He’s doing great,” a hospitalspokesman said Monday. “He’s been senthome.” Burnett was released Saturday.MUSICRAFT SPECIALThis is our portable phonograph:THE MODEL ELEVEN.CIRCUITRY: All solid-state,designed and built entirely byKLH. 15 watts IHF (Institute ofHigh Fidelity) music power. 30watts peak power. Unheard-of in aportable. Low frequency powercontoured to speaker requirements.TURNTABLE: Garrard recordchanger made to KLH specifica¬tions. Very low-mass tone armresists jarring, tracks even badlywarped records. Pickering V-15magnetic pick-up with diamondstylus.CONTROLS: Bass and Treble,allowing ± 15 db correction (i.e.,plenty) at 50 cps and 10,000 cps.Balance between speakers. Volume.(Turntable shuts off system auto¬matically, whether on automatic ormanual.) SPEAKERS: Two of the astonish¬ing speakers used in the ModelTwenty-One radio. Forty feet ofcable.FLEXIBILITY: Inputs for stereotuner or tape player. Tape record¬ings may be made from the speakeroutputs. Headphones may be sub¬stituted for speakers.LIMITATIONS: No radio.ETC.: Weight: 28 pounds. Caseclosed: 24Vi" W x 131/2" H x IVs"D. Control Center: 161/2" W x 13‘/2"D x 75/s " H (with automatic spindlein place). Speaker Enclosures,each: 13'/2" W x 7'/8” H x 4" D.Choice of gray or pearl white vinyl“Contour-lite” case.SUGGESTED PRICE: $199.95.THE Model Eleven is stereophonic. It can fill aliving room with the kind of sound once avail¬able only from massive, expensive and decid¬edly unportable sound systems. As a matter of fact ifwe hadn’t been able to make it do that we wouldn’thave built it. You can take any portable with you; buthow many can you take seriously?ON CAMPUS CALL BOB TABOR 324-300548 E. Oak St.DE 7-4150 MruiCwft 2035 W. 95th St.779-6500 Some Like It ColdHot food will be a Sunday specialty onlyfrom now on at the Pierce Tower snackbar. Financial difficulties forced the cut¬back.In addition to Sunday dinner hours (4:30p.m. to 12:30 a.m.), the Pierce snack barwill continue as a coffee shop 8:30 to 12:30weeknights. Harold Winston, graduate history stu¬dent, Savilii Strakhov, ’70; Michael Zwell,’70; and Joseph Frank, ’70 played for Chi¬cago. Zwell was high scorer for the teamwith 4 points out of 5; Frank was the onlyplayer to go undefeated — he won twogames ami drew three.December 26-30 the Chess Team willtravel to Montreal to compete in the NorthAmerican intercollegiate tournament.Chess Team Mated HT's GuardianAfter having won seven tournamentsstraight, the chess team’s winning streakended this weekend at Earlham College inRichmond, Indiana where 14 teams com¬peted for the Region VII IntercollegiateChampionship.The Maroon Knights began well, winningtheir first four matches. Chicago defeatedPurdue 2(6-1%, Toledo 3-1, Northwestern“A” 2(6-1%, and Marian College 4-0.In the finale the Maroons faced a pow¬erful Case Western Reserve team that hadscored 15 points out of a possible 16 andChicago lost by 2%-l% but still capturedsecond place. Purdue was 3rd, and Toledo4th. University Theatre in conjunction withFOTA is presenting an adaption of “TheGuar dian,” by David Garrick, December 5,6, 7, 8, at 8:30 pm in the Ida Noyes Library.“The Guardian” is being dramatized bythe Cain Company to convey an idea of 18thcentury drama. It is composed of an allEnglish cast. The two act play will be pre¬ceded by a harpsichord recital by Evange¬line Cobb.The director is Donald Shojai, assistantprofessor of English. Virgil Burnett, direc¬tor of Berman Galleries, will be the design¬er.Tickets are $2 and can be bought at IdaNoyes desk or at the door.Novombor 25, 1969/Tba Chicago Maroon/5VISA CenterContinued from Page FourThere are a wide variety of people at theClayton, though. Many show great concernfor their physical appearance and holdpart-time employment within or outside thehotel. However, the atmosphere here isgenerally depressing. pital, forget they were ill, and begin anew,but this is difficult while they are still sur¬rounded by people who are so mentally un-blanced and who constantly remind the bet¬ter patients of their own pasts.Outpaients Learn SkillsMany of the residents are very poor andbecause they cannot afford to move out andare unable to hold full-time jobs, feel cagedin at the Clayton. It is usually the some¬what better patients who feel this the moststrongly and are anxious for a chance tomove away from the atmosphere createdby the patients who are still very unwell.They want to forget their years at the hos- The Thresholds is the rehabilitation cen¬ter on the near north side where VISAmembers conduct their programs. Thresh-holds is not a permanent residence, butrather a day center for former mentalpatients to help them develop their socialskills so they can constructively handle alarge amount of free time.Annette Jaffe, ’70, who is in charge of theVISA Thresholds group, says that during the week the Threshold members (formerpatients) have job training in the mornings(maintenance, housekeeping, food service),and various therapy sessions in the after¬noon. The atmosphere is informal and pro¬vides an opportunity for the Thresholdmembers to relearn social skills, to read¬just to community life at their own pace,and to regain confidence in their abilities.On Saturdays, four VISA members, in con¬junction with VISTA volunteers, run a pro¬gram which is a continuation of the week¬day program. Members pay twenty-fivecents and come any time they want fromnoon until four. VISTA and VISA volunteerslead classes such as public speaking, arts and crafts, literature, cooking, photographyand typing. Between fifteen and thirtypeople, aged eighteen to fifty come everyweek. When classes are not in session themembers and volunteers mix in the loungefor coffee and conversation, play pool orchess, or listen to music. The Saturday pro¬gram offers both members and volunteersa chance to relax and a chance to learnabout others and themselves as people.Committee Is NamedTuesday, November 25 Saturday, November 29 Saturday, December 6LECTURE: Professor Barbara Hardy, University ofLondon, "Feeling in Fiction". Breasted Hall, OrientalInstitute, 4 pm.TALK: "Is the Anti-War Movement Enough?", a revolu¬tionary view by Kim Allen, regional organizer, youngsocialist alliance, Ida Noyes 1st floor lounge, 7:30 pm.CONCERT: Final A.A.C.M., Wallace McMillan En¬semble, Blue Gargoyle, 8:05 pm.INTERNATIONAL FOLK DANCING: InternationalHouse, Auditorium, 8 pm.DOC FILMS: Double Indemnity, Cobb Hall, 8 pm. TWENTY-FIRST ANNUAL RECEPTION AND PARTYFOR LATIN AMERICAN STUDENTS: InternationalHouse, 7:30 pm.GILBERT AND SULLIVAN OPERA: Cox and Box, HMSPinafore. Matinee, Mandel Hall. 1:30 pm. COLLEGIUM MUSICUM, SOLO ENSEMBLE Howard M.Brown, director. Medieval French and Renaissancemusic. Bond Chapel, 8:30 pm.CONTEMPORARY FILMS: Alfie, Cobb Hall, 7 and 9:30pm.Wednesday, November 26MEETING: UC Baha'i Fellowship, Ida Noyes, EastLounge, 2nd floor, 3:30 pm.LECTURE: Social Science 121, "Marx's Concept ofSociety", C.L.R. James, Visiting Professor of Sociolo¬gy, Northwestern University, Kent 107, 11:30 am.COUNTRY DANCERS: Dances from the British Islesand Scandinavia, Ida Noyes Dance Room, 8 pm.DOC FILMS: Run For Cover, Cobb Hall, 8 pm.FORUM: "Discussions on Tenure: Rational or Politi¬cal?", sponsored by Students for a Political Alterna¬tive. Speakers: Mike Goldberer (NUC), Richard Le¬vins (Biology Dept.), Danus Skene (Grad Student Poli.Sci.), University Women's Assoc. Rep. Rosenwald 2, 8pm. Sunday, November 30 Sunday, December 7CONTEMPORARY ART FOR YOUNG COLLECTORS:Renaissance Society Gallery, Goodspeed Hall, Room108. Through Dec. 22.UNIVERSITY RELIGIOUS SERVICES: Schubert Ogden,Professor, Theology, The Divinity School, RockefellerMemorial Chapel, 11 am. CONVOCATION SUNDAY: Gilbert F. White, Professor,Department of Geography, Rockefeller MemorialChapel, 11 am.COLLEGIUM MUSICUM, SOLO ENSEMBLE: BondChapel, 8:30 pm.Monday, December 1 Tuesday, December 9RECRUITING VISIT: Stanford University-School of Edu-cation-Stanford, California, ext. 3282 for appointments. MEETING: University Council,3:40 pm. Business East 106,Tuesday, December 2 Saturday, December 13 An appointment with the student advisorycommittee to the office of admissions andaid can be made through chairman KarlMenninger, ’72, at 5747 University Ave..752-9718.Thursday, November 27CROSS COUNTRY: Central AAU 5,000 Meter Champion¬ships, Riis Park, 11 am.COMMUNITY THANKSGIVING SERVICE: RockefellerMemorial Chapel, 11 am.FIRESIDE: U.C. Baha'i Fellowship, at the Hoffs, s634 S.Blackstone, NO 7-7507, all welcome. 8 pm.TABLE EUCHARIST AND THANKSGIVING DINNER:Bonhoeffer House, 5554 Woodlawn, 12:30 pm. LECTURE: Professor Jean Jourdan, "Le Surrealisme etla Collective Creation", Classics 21, 3:30 pm.CONTEMPORARY CHAMBER PLAYERS: Roger Mal-itz, cello; Lynn Strondola, piano; Sonatas by Bach,Kondoly, Brahms, Stravinsky. Mandel Hall, 8:30 pm.MEETING: College Faculty, Quantrell Hall, 3:40 pm.RECRUITING VISIT: Columbia University-GraduateSchool of Business, New York, N.Y., ext. 3282 for ap¬pointments.PROGRAM: Center for Continuing Education, Mr. VictorH. Yngve, Information Utility and Social Choice,through Dec. 3. PROGRAM: Center for Continuing Education, Mr JulianLevi, National School Lunch Litigation Conference,through Dec. 13.Friday, December 19LECTURE: Microbiology Club, Dwight L. Anderson. As¬sociate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Univer¬sity of Minnesota. "Structure of Bacteriophage 29 andits Infectious DNA." Ricketts 1, 4 pm.Friday, December 5Friday, November 28GILBERT AND SULLIVAN OPERA: Cox and Box, andHMS Pinafore. Sponsored by University of ChicagoLaboratory Schcol Parents' Association, Mandel Hall,8:30 pm.DOC FILMS: Passion of Joan of Arc, Cobb Hall, 7:15and 9:33 pm.CONFERENCE: Residential workshop on application ofAdult Education Principles. Training course for a se¬lect group of medical specialists involved in continuingeducation. By University of Chicago Department ofEducation to a limited group, ext 3188. ROCKEFELLER CHAPEL CHOIR: and Chicago Sym¬phony rchestra, Richard Vikstrom, conductor. Ora¬torio Festival Messiah, Handel. Rockefeller MemorialChapel, 8 pm.LECTURE: Division of Biological Sciences, Dr Harold S.Ginsberg, Chairman, Department of Microbiology, Uni¬versity of Pennsylvania, "The Structure, Synthesis andMorphogenisis of Adenovirus Capsid Proteins." Rick¬etts 1, 4 pm.FILM: Committee for African Studies: In Search of My¬self, Judd Auditorium, 7:45 pm.PLAY: The Guardian, a play by David Garrick, a stu¬dent-faculty performance, combining the efforts ofCain's Co., UT, and FOTA. Also, a Harpsichord Recit¬al given by Evangeline Cobb. Ida Noyes Library, 8:30pm, through Dec. 8. Tickets $2 at Reynolds Club Deskand at the door.MODERK DANCE CLASSES4 PM 15,30 PMMondoy * SaturdayBoHat & Jazz alto taught.Allison Theater Dance Center17 N. StoleRoom 1902332-9923 3lMleA8leale?|M|eA«fwfr8lMle»le* Cornell Dforiil 5J 1645 E. 55th STREET *# CHICAGO, ILL. 60615 *FA 4-1651 ^35 MM. SLIDES WANTED!We pay well for color slides of Chicago demonstrations at1968 Convention. Our Prentice-Hall Co. produces educa¬tional filmstrips and will pay at least $20.00 per in¬dividual slide, adjusting payment for quantity. Rejectsreturned promptly. Suggest you send slides insured, returnreceipt requested. LINDA TOONI, WARREN SCHLOATPRODUCTIONS PLEASANTVILLE, N.Y. 10570for your gift needs1541 EAST HYDE PARK BLVD.955-0177‘Appropriately Unique'A/Tha Chicago Maroon/November 25, 196? BLOW YOUR BLUESMINDTHE GOOD BROTHERS* * PRESENT * *LUTHERALLISONAND HIS BLUES BANDSUNDAY-NOV. 30— 1969 —STARTING 8:00 P.M.NORTH PARK HOTEL1936 NORTH CLARKADVANCE TICKETS $2.00 - AT DOOR $2 JOADVANCE TICKETS ATNSANITY SOUTH, 51ST AND HARPER ADVERTISERS:The next Maroon will be our end-of-the quarter spec¬tacular published on December 5. The advertising dead¬line for this issue will be MONDAY, DEC. 1, 5 PM.We will not publish a paper this coming Friday, Nov. 28,nor will we publish on Tuesday, Dec. 2.LAST CHANCEThe December 5 issue will be your last chance to reach oneof Chicago's wealthiest university markets until January 6.About 80% of U of C students are graduate and pro¬fessional students, and everybody (well, almost) will bebuying presents for Mumsie, Daddykins, and their ownlittle brats.Remember, Santa Claus reads The Maroon. The Chart¬reuse Goose has heard this from a reliable source.HYDE PARK THEATRESTARTS FRIDAY, HOV. 28thEverything he touched turned to marriage.M,Emanuel l Wolf presentsan AlLtEO ARTISTS FILMCfaudt Bern jColor by DE LUXEReleased by Allied ArtistsA SURPRISE FROM CLAUDE BERRI, THE MAKER OF THE TWO OF US Hold upyour local gasstation^SH0RELAND HOTELSpecial Rates for5* identi and RelativesSingle rooms from $9.00 dailyDowl lie bed rooms from $12.00 dailyTwin rooms from $14.00 dailyLake ViewOffice space alsoAvailable from 200sq. ft. to 1800 sq. ft. Please call N.T. NorbertPL 2-10005454 South Shore Drive DR. AARON ZIMBLEROptometristeye examinationscontact lensesin theNew Hyde ParkShopping Center1510 E. 55th St.363-7644 . If you’ve got a bit of larceny itiyour heart, you’ll love theRenault 10.You see, it gets 35 miles to thegallon.And as far as gas stations areconcerned, that’s highway robbery.So don’t he too harsh when thehoys at your local gas station acta little grumpy.In fact,you can soften the blow.Just tell them how little it coststo buy a Renault 10.($1725 poe)Then suggest they get one torthemselves.After all, they might have a bitof larceny innrK| J| |||J^ilM2235 SO.MICHIGAN AVE.CHICAGO, ILL.TEL. 326-2550Anyone interested in further information 1about VISA may call Susan Leff at 752-7256or John Peplinski at 684-9658.Susan Leff, ’71, a Maroon staff writer, isalso in charge of part of the VISA programshe describes in this article.A 13-member student committee will ad¬vise the office of admissions and aid thisyear. Appointed last spring by the studentadvisory committee to the dean of the col¬lege, the new committee is studying cri¬teria for admissions, financial aid for un¬dergraduates, and special programs suchas black recruitment and the small towntalent search.Committee members hope to give specif¬ic information to individual students in ad¬dition to channeling student ideas and sug¬gestions to the office of admissions and aid.A report of their findings will be publishedperiodically.Other committee members are DavidAdelstein, ’72; Armand Andry, ’72; MarthaArmstrong, ’71; Mike Cook, ’72; JeromeCulp, secretary ’72; Elise Frank, ’70; Bar¬bara Grau, ’71; Peggy Greenfield, 70; AnnHamblin, ’70; Joan Huebl, ’72; Marc Lip-schutz, ’70* Rob McAdow,-’7i;=aBd DavidUtevsky, 72.*u(Maroon vlaisiried AasjYOU'RE SO SWEET HORSEFLIES KEEP HANGIN' 'ROUND YOUR FACEfor saleAM/FM Tuner $25 or Best Offer.Petrie KNIFT (Discount for Medi-f f s udents). SPACE AGE ALUM-INUM FOIL PRESS. 924-9687.r^mbretta Scooter 175 CC NewBattery $200 Call Eve 7684180.KITTENS - LITTER TRAINEDFREE! 978-1243 Lovable Study part¬ners.furniture Din Rm Gp-W. chairs-$10, lamps, drapes. 955-7818,FOUND: . . • eight years later,vour child "hood" .idol. Poprockcritics view Elvis in Vegas andcinq up loads of lemons, in this^nth's HARPER'S MAGAZINE,America's First Monthly. On sale The Perfect Gift. Yourself and twoUC Charter Flight Tickets to Eu¬rope. Ext 3598 or 3272.South Shore at its best — 3-bed-room, IVt bath, Georgian brick. Fullbasement, attached garage, largefenced yard, fireplace. 324-1728 eve¬nings.RIDESRide Wanted Over Thnksgvng toAkron Ohio or Exit 11 on OhioTrnpk. Call John 74 Hitchcock.Thanksgiving Ride Needed for 2to Antioch or Vicinity (Ohio); Ex¬penses shared; Call 288-6610 Room1308 or 3304.Ride Offered to Cleveland Wed.Nov. 26 Help Drive Call 667-3531.TEREO COMPONENTS AT LOW¬EST PRICES AR, KLH, DUAL,;ARRARD, DYNA. ALL AT MUSI-RAFT. CAMPUS REP BOB TA-iOR 363-4555.erox Copies 9c, 7c, 5c 8, 7c, 5c, 3c10 runs. 10 percent Discount on: 7c 5c rate.MODERN IMPRESSIONS1031 West Polk at UICCPhone: 829-0248 SKI VAIL AT XMASSKI CLUB WINTER TRIP — ONEWEEK VAIL, COLORADO BY AIRLeave Dec. 13 — Return Dec. 20.Reasonable cost! — Marty 324-8930LOST AND FOUNDFemale Dog Found Near Coop.Call 493-8041. Tortoise shell cat (white, orange,and black) named Daisy. Marylandand 57th area. Plaese call Judy at643-6632.Lost! 4 Mo Old Gray Female CatCa 11 363-5298 668-5305- REWARD.PERSONALFOTA Fosters Frustrated PrimaDonnas—If You Fit In Phone BU8-6610, Deborah Davison.Willing Virgin Looking for Gang-bang. Interested, well-endowed per¬sons please apply. 643-0749. (Ex¬pedience preferred but not neces¬sary.The New Stones Album is in, only$3.99 at Student Co-op.GARRICK'S THE GUARDIAN DEC5-8.10 Mo F Cat Needs Home LovesKids X4733, 493-7046.Vicky Loves the U of C.Is Free Love an Abstract for younow?Rediscover your Libido. Stop Re¬pression. Become Un-hung-up."We've come a long way, baby."Why don't you come with us? Ap¬ply Maroon Box 88.Rolling StonesLet It Bleed$3.99as are all $5.98 albumsSTUDENT CO-OPREYNOLDS CLUB BASEMENT ' The Guardian Protects you fromExam-time Blues.All the World's a Stage, And FOTADrama Upstages the World. TheScene's at New Dorms, 1318.Victoria is alive, well and living inG-B 303.Durkheim Committed Suicide.Free Kittens: 6 Box-Trained,Weaned, Charming, UnusuallySmart! 955-3920 or 363-5644.Prof. Jean Goudon will lecture on"Le Surrealisme et la CreationCollective" Dec 2, 3:30, Classics 21.GARRICK'S The Guardian Dec 5-8.Some Sound Advice! MUSICRAFTCares Enough to have a CampusRep, Lowest Prices — Free Deliv.on all stereo components. Call BobTabor 363-4555 for price quotes.WRITER'S WORKSHOP (PL 2-8377)FOTA DRAMAFOTA DRAMA FOTA DRAMAADDRESS ZIP□ 1 year subscription $6.00_D_Yeqrbook Issue $1.00THE FAMILY NEWSPAPERThe Chicago Maroon can add a touch of class to every family’s coffee table...jest of year Xmas Special Subscription $6.00 j j j ; *; . Is the Theatre Really Dead? FOTADoubts it — Help Us Prove Not So!Join the Drama Staff Call DeborahDavison, New Dorms Rm 1318.Finding Hyde Park nights cold allalone in that big bed? Try anelectric blanket.Some of the World's Most FamousPeople Have Ended Up in Boxes.You Too Can Have Your Own Box.Plan to Invest or Help out in theYearBox. YearBox is more than aBox.Quiet 4th-year male student wishesto live'in the home of a facultyfamily win + spr. Arrangementsnegotiable. Call 493-4540 5-6 PM andkeep trying.SCENESFOTA Presents UT's Production ofDavid Garrick's The Guardian Dec.5, 6, 7, 8 8:30 PM Ida Noyes Lib.Tickets $2 at Reynolds Club Deskor at Door.MODERN DANCE CLUB PRESEN.TATION Technique, Improvisation,Choreography, Tuesday Nov 25, 7:00PM Ida Noyes Hall Dance Room.If You Have Doubts That PartisanPolitical Action or Traditional Re¬ligion is the Answer to the Ills ofMankind, We Agree—That is Whywe are Bahai's Join Us Wednes¬days, Ida Noyes At 3:30, to Ask,Listen, and Learn.Pre Law Studs Hear Prof. GerhardCasper of Law, Political Depts IdaNoyes Lib Wed 4 PM Refreshments.See Some of the Cain's Co. Cast atits Best: Nick Barton, Edna Ep¬stein, Kenneth Northcott, David Ru-daII, Diane Rudall in Garrick's TheGuardian, Dec. 5, 6, 7, 8 8:30 PMin Ida Noyes Lib. Tickets $2.03.Let Not This World Be Too MuchWith Thee: See the Old-WorldComedy, The Guardian.Four American student groups planto settle in Israel in Kibbutz orurban collective between 1970 and1973. Open joint seminar in Chica¬go area Jan 2-4 1970 For moreinfo, call Barbara Tel 274-1011.MODERN DANCEDEMONSTRATIONNovember 25 7:00 PMAt: Ida Noyes Dance RoomEverybody Free!!Prof. Jean Goudon will lecture on"Le Surrrealisme et la CreationCollective" Dec 2, 3:30, Classics 21.Delicious food. Beautiful atmos¬phere. Plus minus 20 per cent. OnTuesday nights. Effendi nine fivefive five one five one.YEARBOXThe History and Philosophy of thebox neglected by the college isresurrected by the yearBox. A fewfamous boxes of yore: Pandora'sBox, Boxer shorts or the BoxerRebellion.FOR RENTApt. to Lease $190 Mo 53 Harper.5 Rooms. Call 288-1238.EAST HYDE PARK-VERY DESIR¬ABLE APARTMENT. 5 Rooms. IVaBath Av. Jan 1, Rent $165. 684-7983.O’HABE CHRISTMASBUS SERVICEPICK UP AT YOURDOOR IN HYDE PARK!Operating DailyDECEMBER 10,11,12,13Our buses will pick you up at yourdoor in time for arrival at O'HareAirport at:8:00 A.M. 4:30 P.M.2:30 P.M. 6:30 P.M.ONE LOW FARE OF $3.50Tickets on sale atMIDWAY TRAVEL SERVICEIN THE ADMINISTRATIONBUILDING LOBBYBuy now - Tickets must be pur¬chased no later than 12 Noon onday prior to def>arture.FULLY INSURED,kADIO-DISPATCHED BUSESPROVIDED BY WETZELTRANSPORTATION COMPANY Snell Single Rm Contracts StartingNow Kitchen No Board After 9PM Ext 260 Rm 23 or 53.Private room available in lovelyKenwood home call 548-4748.Apt Avail Dec 15 7R Enc Bk PorchPantry 2Vi Bthr. 55 & Hyde Park$200. 643-2032 After 4:30.Pvt. Room in Bur-Judson Grad atfor Win-Spr Eves. 667-2904.ROOMMATES WANTED We're Looking for New Guys toRelate to in Ancient Ways. Redis¬cover Life without TV. Write Ma¬roon Box 88. Replies kept Confi¬dential.Fight Abortion Law, Court-LegisVolunteers Needed. Also Money Call667-4943 (Day) BU 8-2007 (Eve)FOTA Needs Several People ToWork on our Fund-Raising Com¬mittee. Meet the High Society ofChicago. In this worthwhile contribu¬tion to FOTA '70 Call Doug Kissel I324-5617.Fern Student Right Away 5338 SHarper Call pm 324-5463. Own Room.3rd Fern Grad to Share Large Apt54 & Kimbark Own Room $57. 50Mo 363-7682 After 6:00.Grad male wanted to Share Lg HdPk Apt w/2 others. Own Room$51.67/Mo. 752-6151.PEOPLE WANTEDWanted: Liberated Males for GroupSensitivity Experiment. Please indi¬cate interests, & direction you wishthe group to take. Apply MaroonBox 88.Wanted: For Deliveries and Errandsfor Social Issues Magazine in HydePark. Auto and valid license re¬quired. Knowledge of city es¬sential. 10-20 hours per week aver¬age. Call Mr. Carney 493-2020.WANTED: Live Script for Black-friars musical CASH reward dialMID-ALPS. Wanted: Theater Manager for HydePark Theater. Experience not neces¬sary. Call 726-9293Wanted: 2 Passengers—Flying toBoston/Albany Region, Dec 23-Jan2. Share Expenses. Note to PeterBeck, 5540 S. Hyde Park, Chicago60637 or Call 288-9489.PEOPLE FOR SALE"May We Do Your Typing?" 363-1104.BUSINESS STUDENTSATTENTIONWant to Meet and Discuss YourIdeas with the leading businessmenof Chicago? Fund-raising for FOTAwill give you the opportunity Call324-5617 Now!WANTEDWanted Motorcycles: Wrecked,Dead, Degenerate, Unloved 643-8210.Lithe and Charming Blonde FOTADrama Coordinator Needs An As¬sistant. Must Have a Minimumof Theatre Knowhow and a Maxi¬mum of Guts. Cali Deborah Davisonat New Dorms. Rm 1318.Gen Offc & Lite Bkping. GoodSalary 8> Free Hospitalization. SouthShore Location. 288-6343. PUBLIC APOLOGYI publicly apologize for strikingand doing physical harm to SarahGlazer. I have not done this asyet but after reading that garbageshe calls a review (Fantasticks),I may not be able to control myselfif I ever meet her.—Jerry Troyer.SEND A TELEGRAM TOWASHINGTON AT THEMAROON OFFICEIDA NOYES12121.59th St.rm 304...MAIL YOUR CLASSIFIED TO THE MAROON1212 E. 59th St., Chicago, 60637DATES TO RUNNAME, ADDRESS, PHONECHARGE: 50c per line, 40c per each line if the ad is repeated in asubsequent, consecutive issue. Non-University people: 75c perline, 60c per repeat line. There are 30 letters, spaces, andpunctuation marks in a line. ALL ADS PAID IN ADVANCE!HEADING: There is an extra charge of $1.00 for your own heading. Normalones (For Sales, etc.) are free.rr you can Hear yourself think . . . and if you don twant to think, there's good booxe.Bass ale and Schlitx beer on tapTHE EAGLEcocktails . . . luncheon . . . dinner . , . late snacks , , ,5311 BLACKSTONE BANQUET ROOM HY 3-1933‘AlhambraFashions to make youfeel as beautiful as you 'lllook Finely tailoredoriginals of domesticand imported fabrics.Mod. Fd wardian,conventional andcasual styles plusdressv things from$12.99 to $100.00 inmost sizes. Stop inand browse awhile Youare welcome■!Hours:Mon.-Wed10.00 to 7:30Thurs.-Sat.10:00 to 9:301 453 East Hyde ParkF0TA presents the University Theatreproduction ofDavid Garrick'sTHE GUARDIANdirected by Donald A. ShojaiAlso, a harpsichord recital byEvangeline CobbDec. 5,6,7,8 - 8:30 PM in Ida NoyesLibrary, 1212 E. 59th StreetA student-faculty performancefeaturing Nick Barton, EdnaEpstein, Kenneth Northcott, DavidRudall, Diane RudallTickets $2.00 at door or at ReynoldsClub DeskRefreshments Served SO.I.ATKK-HAMANTASHsymposiumTUES NOV 251 IFM IDA NOTESJke met»^kjtt'f»(,tkedoyc«lSeoolojuJ. keloy «l telW< 4 tf*3500 ywr old f«jMweei th«t< ystn-aomic Jt k(tC)tiXMAS SUB FOR THE FOLKSAT HOME -$6,00 a deal.STUDY LAW AT NOTRE DAME AND LONDONMEET PROFESSOR BUD MURDOCK,NOTRE DAME LAW SCHOOLWEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 3 2:00 P.M.TO 5:00 P.M. MAKE APPOINTMENTS ATPLACEMENT CENTER50 FULL TUITION FIRST YEAR SCHOLARSHIPS AVAILABLEMINORITY STUDENTS AND APPLICATIONS FROM WOMENENCOURAGEDYEAR ABROAD STUDY AT UNIVERSITY OF LONDONCOMBINED MBA-LAW PROGRAM AVAILABLENOTICEThe Maroon will notbe printed on Nov.28 in honor ofThanksgiving ULAYliCy’S ALL-NJGIIT SHOWRIRfORMANGU FRIDAY t IAIURDA T FOtlOWING (Ail RIGUiAR MATURIMe*. 14David lten'sOLIVER TWIST Me*. ISFelliei'iLA STRADANev. 21let DylanDON'T LOOK BACK Me*. 72I'lClIPSINev. 71TRUFFAUT'SSTOLEN KISSES Nev. nFELLINI'SSPIRITS OF THE DEADAFTER THE MARCH ON WASHINGTONMIDWEST SOCIALIST CONFERENCENOV. 28 - 30ST. LOUIS SESSIONS ON: THE WAR IN VIETNAMWOMEN'S LIBERATION STRUGGLETHIRD WORLD LIBERATIONSTUDENT POWERTRANSPORTATION $7 HOUSING FREE - BRING A SLEEPING BAGREGISTRATION$3 INFORMATION - YOUNG SOCIALIST ALLIANCE939-2667Non-Profit Org.U.s. POSTAGEPAIDChicago, IllinoisPermit No. 79318/The Chicago Maroon/November 25, 1969