Sociology Defends Stand on DRLENE DIXONReacted Radical■ The Maroon received the text of thisstatement from the sociology departmentlate\Wednesday night.To the students and faculty of the Univer-it$ 3\f Chicago:0 kak ene Dixon is quoted in the Maroonot February 3 as stating that she has “no objection to public intellectual criticismand evaluation of any aspect of her work.”An editorial in the Maroon the next dayinvites the department of sociology publicyto explain its decision not to recommendher for reappointment. Therefore, we wantto issue the following statement:Mrs Dixon was asked last autumn tosubmit to the department of sociology allunpublished as well as published materialon which she wished her evaluation forreappointment to be based, including state¬ments of any ideas she might have had forfuture work even though her analysis andexposition had not been completed.A careful reading of all this materialcomplimented by a discussion of her teach¬ing of sociology students led to the unani¬mous decision by all the tenured faculty inresidence that the intellectual quality ofthis work did not meet the standards re¬quired for reappointment in her depart¬ment. The main standards employed —and they are certainly more rigorous thanthose in a great many universities and col¬leges across the nation — are whether theapproach to the study of the sociologicalproblem, the ideas expressed, the methods employed, or the interpretations of re¬search material presented, make a sub¬stantial contribution to the discipline at alevel appropriate to this department. Weare confident that any group of qualifiedsociologists reviewing this material regard¬less of its members political views or itssex composition would arrive at the samejudgement of her scholarly potential as wedid.If a detailed public criticism of MarleneDixon’s work, much of which is still in apreliminary stage, were undertaken by thedepartment, it would be contrary to herbest interests and to the best interests ofthe department, and University as a while.It would compromise the confidentiality ofour deliberation; it would have to include acomparative judgement we made on thework of other junior members of the de¬partment if it were to be complete, andsuch public assessment, would violate theprinciple that intellectual criticism is bestmade by individuals, and not a corporatebody such as a department. Any individualfaculty member may explain the reasonswhy he arrived at his decision, and manyundoubtedly will. But if the department acting in its official c^fcitoBtyeYS'W'Tnfokethe shortcomings in the smiiubUgHed/workof a younger colleague a matter of publicwritten record, we could rightfully be ac¬cused of acting irresponsibly.The criteria employed by the departmentof sociology in making recommendationson personnel are fully spelled out in astatement issued January 17, 1969, which isavailable in the department office.Sociology Department, the University ofChicago:C A AndersonPeter BlauTerry ClarkJames FennessyLeo A GoodmanRobert W HodgeMorris Janowitz, chairmanDonald M LevineDuncan MacRae, JrWilliam L PerishThomas W TullamEdward SchilmDavid StreetFred L StrodteckJerry SuttlesTHE MAROONVolume 77, Number 36 The Chicago Maroon Thursday, February 6, 1969Protesters Hold Liberation ClassesBy Wendy GlocknerThe difference between sociology andMarxism according to Richard Flacks, as¬sistant professor of sociology, lies in theirdifferent conceptions of the nature ofsociety and man.“For Marx, the problem is freedom,”Flacks said. “With sociology the problemis order.” Flacks spoke Wednesday on“Reactionary Sociology,” as one of the fiveliberation classes held in the tea room ofthe social sciences building.The remaining four speakers were: EviGoldfield, “On Women”; Len Handelsmen,graduate student in sociology, on “Univer¬sity Expansion-Racism Towards Commu¬nity”; Len Radinsky, assistant professor ofanatomy, on “The Menace of BiologicalResearch”, and Staughton Lynd, as part ofthe radical history caucus.Liberation classes were organized by thedemonstrators in the ad building as part ofstudents’ attempt to educate the campus.Flacks described the Marxist conceptionof alienation as one which is possible toovercome. Alienation is determined bywhether man can determine his own condi¬tion, he said. The man who can’t, Flackssaid, is alienated. He stated that sociolo¬gy’s conception of alienation is determinedby questionnaires.Flacks defined the social role of the soci¬ologist as an “informed consultant of thosewho manage society.” Sociology should becritical” he said, “not managerial”.Radinsky, speaking about biological re¬search, cited two destructive forces inbiology: chemical and biological warfare,and pesticides. The chemical arsenal, hesaid, contained “deadly weapons” such astear and nausea gas, nerve gas, anddefoliants (which he called “super weedkillers”).The biological arsenal, he continued, con¬tained weapons which could produce anth¬rax, diptheria, typhoid, and encephylitis.Radinsky cited an example of 6,000 sheepkilled in Utah last year of anthrax, be¬cause of the. army’s mistake in testingweapons. He briefly touched mi DDT, cit¬ing it as a cause of air and water pollution.“On Women”, Evi Goldfield cited the op¬pression of women as a social problem David TravisOPEN UNIVERSITY: Richard Flacks lectures yesterday in Sec Sci 122 during first day of “liberation classescomparable to poverty. She called for or¬ganization of women to prevent their rolefrom being second to men.Miss Goldfield asserted that women arenot yet liberated. “Quote liberation nowmeans sexual liberation,” she said.She mentioned that women have resistedsuppression by protesting Miss Americapageants, organizing the Women’s Inter¬national Terror Conspiracy from Hell(WITCH), and guerilla theater tactics. Handelsmen outlined the history of theUniversity policy toward Woodlawn from1952, pointing out that he considered theUniversity’s compliance in urban renewalracist.Lynd discussed radical historians.Besides holding liberation classes, dem¬onstrators in the ad building attempted toeducate the campus by canvassing indorms, class room buildings, and cafe¬terias. They also tried to encourage dis¬cussions in iidividual classes. CorrectionContrary to what was reported inWednesday’s Maroon, JonathanKleinbard did not say that MiltonFriedman would retract his state¬ments. The information was incor¬rectly supplied by the infamous JohnSeifert, and the Maroon reporter whocovered the College faculty meetingneglected to confirm it.—wr'-. ■ ■ f ■ ' - V mmClassifiedsCoverageI am disappointed that, since the periodof the disruptive sit-in in the adminis¬tration building, the Maroon has not pub¬lished information and communicationsfrom the faculty of the department of soci¬ology. Policy statements by the depart¬ment of sociology and letters to the editorby faculty have not been printed. I havemade myself available for a prolonged in¬terview including the topics of promotionand reappointment, and the evaluation ofthe teaching in the department. None ofthese materials have appeared in the col¬umns of the Maroon.Information supplied by the departmentof sociology is much more fully dis¬seminated by Radio WHPK. In the future,I hope that the Maroon will present suchmaterials as it sees fit. Copies of basicstatements and communication can be ob¬tained in the department of sociology of¬fice, Social Science 323, or by contactingmembers of the department of myself atextension 2968.Morris Janowitz(Editor’s note: The Maroon has not beenattempting to surpress any informationcoming out of the sociology department.If it appears that any organization hasbeen neglected in our issues, we can onlyascribe it to a lack of funds necessary topublish a larger paper. Perhaps the sit-inwill point out how essential the alreadyexisting student organizations are to com¬munication within the University.) Chem StatementYesterday the Maroon carried a classi¬fied ad, which included references to me.It tried to deal, in a light-hearted fashion,with a very serious problem. But while Iam all in favor of humor, I am afraid thepresent situation is too serious for that. Iwas glad to see that you were also tryingto present a balanced view, and in recogni¬tion of this fact I am writing this letter.While I believe the historical parallels be¬tween what is happening here and whathappened in the German universities be¬fore Hitler are unfortunately relevant, itwould go beyond the scope of a letter tospell them out.The reason I finally decided to write this Statement on behalf of the faculty of thedepartment of chemistry:The faculty of the department of chem¬istry regard the demonstration that is tak¬ing place in the administration building ofthe University of Chicago as a threat tothe academic freedom of this institution. Iturges that the discussions between stu¬dents and faculty which the President hasencouraged for some time be continued. Itis imperative that the University commu¬nity find an academic solution to the prob¬lems that confront it.Norman H Nachtrieb, ChairmanDepartment of Chemistry ConclusionWhat follows is the concluding paragraphof a news story which appeared on page 13of the Jan 31 issue of the Maroon:“Henderson House planned the meeting,made the flyers, and worded the petitioncondemning the sit-in ... ”As resident head of Henderson House Ifeel I must point out to the Maroon thatHenderson House did not take the actiondescribed. It has taken no action in regardto the current controversy. A number ofHenderson men were, as individuals, in¬volved in organizing the Mandel meeting.Other men believed that it was right and proper that they join the demonstration.Your attribution is particularly unfortu¬nate in that Henderson House does have astrong sense of community and a housecouncil which acts autonomously and effec¬tively on all matters of common concern tothe house. People of all opinions con¬cerning the Dixon controversy participateactively in that community.Sidney F HuttnerResident HeadHenderson House(The misunderstanding arose becauseseveral of the individuals involved live inHenderson House'. We apologize.)letter is that in the various commu¬nications which have come to my attentionso far, little has been said about attitudesto be found among certain segments ofadult society. I do not think I have to reite¬ Council Decries Distortionsrate my belief that whatever aberrant be¬havior is to be found among the youngergeneration it is, to a very large degree,due to the ways they were raised in theirhome. Much less of it is due to the struc¬ture of our society, although it too has itsimpact. Nevertheless, whatever the originof behavior found among a small minorityof students, and however convinced I amthat some of them are in need of psy¬chiatric care, it cannot be condoned whenit becomes disruptive to others. Much as Idisapprove of any efforts to impose one’swill by force, I blame those parts of adultsociety even more who do not recognizeaberrant behavior as such and who, to thedetriment of all concerned, applaud-it, con¬done it, or excuse it. In this sense I am ascritical of certain attitudes which someadults have shown in regard to the sit inand related phenomena as I am the sit-in itself.I further believe that how this particularevent will be resolved, whether it will havegood, bad, or no consequences, will largelydepend on how mature, responsible andrational adult society responds to it. Thusmy dismay is not only with a small dis¬ruptive segment of the students but alsowith that segment of the adult group whoshould know better what reasonable, re¬sponsible and mature attitudes youngpeople need to encounter in adult society,if they are to grow into reasonable, respon¬sible and mature adults.Bruno Bettelheim By Edward Rosenheim, JrThe following statement was recordedfor broadcast and issued by Edward WRosenheim, Jr, professor of English andspokesman for the committee of the Uni¬versity council on Wednesday.My name is Edward Rosenheim, Jr. Iam a professor in the department of Eng¬lish and the undergraduate division of thehumanities — and I am the spokesman forthe committee of the council in the Univer¬sity of Chicago.Rowley professor ofeducation And since my purpose in speaking to youis to clarify matters of fact, let me makeclear the nature of the committee of thecouncil at the outset. The faculty council ofour University is composed of 51 members,elected by the vote of all faculty membersin the rank of assistant professor or abovewho have been on the faculty for three. years or more. This body — the council —is a ruling body of the University, chargedwith responsibility for all matters of aca¬demic policy which are assigned to the col¬lective faculty for decision. The committeeof the council is composed of seven mem¬bers — elected by the 51 members of thecouncil; it is charged with conveying to thecouncil, with or without recommendations,all matters for council action; moreover,its chairman is the President of the Uni¬versity and in addition to its regular juris¬diction it advises him on any question onwhich he seeks opinion. The spokesman ofthe committee of the council is elected bythe committee for the purpose of reportingon its activities to the council as a wholeand presenting matters for council action.I am speaking to you now because therehave been unfortunate distortions, in thepress and broadcast media, of certain posi¬tions respecting the current disruptive sitin, which have been taken by the counciland its committee. Let me say first that it isthe long-standing policy of the council,reaffirmed unanimously within the last twoweeks, that activities which are disruptiveof the proper functioning of the Universityand which violate the privacy and freedomof its individual members are prohibitedand subject to disciplinary action. The sit-in, currently in effect, has been held to bean activity of this nature, and the dis¬ciplinary proceedings now under way re¬flect the declared policy of the council.Of even more immediate concern to meare recent distortions, in the press andelsewhere, of the council’s position with re¬spect to communication with students, onthe one hand, and with respect to bargain¬ing or negotiation on what is described as“amnesty” on the other.The council last night adopted a state¬ment declaring its willingness — and thatof the committee of the council — to con¬duct free and open discussion with studentsupon issues of common concern. The samestatement, however, distinguished betweensuch discussion and “bargaining,” con¬ducted under threatening, coercive, or dis¬ orderly circumstances. The council and itscommittee will not engage in the latterform of discussion. Moreover, because thecouncil has already asserted its convictionthat disruptive disturbances must be metby disciplinary action, it agreed that theentire question of amnesty — which termit took to mean that such disciplinaryprocedures should be unilaterally aban¬doned with respect to all students who areor may be charged with disruptive activity—did not merit formal discussion or mo¬tion; the topic of amnesty was thus tabledwith the concurrence of virtually the entiremembership of the council.It is quite impossible for me to discussall of the misleading and inaccurate state¬ments that have recently appeared in vari¬ous media. Let me take only two exam¬ples.I have learned that, on the radio andelsewhere, it has been said that yesterdaythere was a refusal to meet with studentrepresentatives of the group sitting-in for adiscussion of the issues. In point of fact,upon learning that such discussion wassought, the committee of the council com¬municated its willingness to meet but spec¬ified, under the terms of its declared pol¬icy, that such discussion could not take theform of negotiation, that it should involveonly properly registered students, and thatthe number of students should be no morethan the number of faculty representativesTHi: CHIC AGO MAROONEditor: Roger BlackBusiness Manager: Jerry LevyManaging Editor: John RechtNews Editor: Caroline HeckPhotography Editor: David TravisDay Editor: Mitch BobkinNight Editor: Sue LothNews Board:Ad Building: Wendy GlocknerFaculty: Sylvia PiechockaUndergraduate Students: Chris FraulaGraduate Students: Rob CooleyAdministration: Richard ParoutaudDisciplinary Committee: Leslie StraussAd Building Bureau: Wendy Glockner (bureauchief), Jim Haefemeyer, Chris Lyon, BruceNorton, Paula Szewczyk, Leonard Zax.News Staff: Marv Bittner, Debby Dobish, ConHitchcock, CD Jaco, Blair Kilpatrick, SteveCook, Gerard Leval.Photography Staff: Phil Lathrop, Paul Stelter,Howie Schamest, Steve Aoki.Production Staff: Mitch Bobkin, Robin Kauf¬man, Leslie Strauss, Robert Swift, MitchKahn.Contributing Editors: John Welch, Michael Sor-kin, Jessica Siegel, John Moscow, RobertHardman, Barbara Hurst, David Aiken.Sunshine Girl: Jeanne WiklerFounded in 1892. Pub¬lished by University ofChicago students daily dur¬ing revolutions, on Tues¬days and Fridays through¬out the regular schoolyear and intermittentlythroughout the summer,except during examinationperiods. Offices in Rooms303, 304, and 305 in Ida Noyes Hall, 1212 E.59th St., Chicago, III. 60637. Phone Midway3-0800, Ext. 3269. Distributed on campus and inthe Hyde Park neighborhood free of charge.Subscriptions by mail $7 per year. Non-profitpostage paid at Chicago, III. Subscribers toCollege Press Service. present. I regret to say that, after severalhours, I was informed that the studentswere unwilling to meet under these cir¬cumstances. However, despite this out¬come, a group including 5 academic deansand the dean of faculties agreed that theywould meet the student representatives,and the President of the University an¬nounced his willingness to join in the meet¬ing at any point at which his presence wasinvited. Mr John T Wilson, dean of thefaculties, and Mr Wayne C. Booth, deanof the college, did, indeed meet with thestudents at the specified location. On meet¬ing them, the deans were immediately pre¬sented with a printed document, reiteratingcertain “demands” labled as such. Theconcluded from this opening gesture thatthe kind of discussion they were preparedto engage in could not be properly orprofitably conducted, and they accordinglywithdrew.Or, again, you will be told by one of to¬day’s newspapers that the council has “de¬cided to hold any discussions only with stu¬dent-designated negotiating teams and notwith individuals.” This statement is utterlycontrary to fact and on more than onecount. The council and its committee willnot meet with any one, individuals orteams, whose declared purpose is negotia¬tion. On the other hand, the committee ofthe council will attempt — within the lim¬its of practicability — to meet with anyindividual or group from the faculty or theduly registered student body who seek freediscussion of issues.Let me say that the decisions and dis¬tinctions adopted by the council are, ofcourse, in no way binding upon individualfaculty members. Let me further say thatcontinuing participation, by all concerned,in rational and honorable discussion is ofvital importance if our present tragic situ¬ation is to be hopefully resolved.Finally I wish to say something aboutwhich I feel the deepest personal con¬viction — although I’m confident that theentire committee of the council concurs inmy beliefs. I have heard that the impor¬tant thing is to get the students out of thebuilding; this is, or course, important, butit is not our overriding concern. I havebeen told that the important thing is toavoid violence, whether among intramuralfactions or from outside sources. The avoi¬dance of violence is, again, our deep andconstant concern. But I wish to make itclear that the ultimate purpose to whichour efforts and our energies and, if I maysay so, our prayers are directed, is thepreservation of a great University and ofthe freedom of all those who contribute toits greatness. i‘**By Charles CurtisApproximately 30 members of the Chick-inshit Guerilla Brigade augmented by sev-2ral of current occupants of ad building-aused several administrators to lockhemselves in the Quadrangle ClubWednesday afternoon. The Chickenshitsnarched around the building tooting<azoos, chanting “61” (referring to the 61students suspended by the disciplinarycommittee Sunday evening), tapping onwindows, and singing. Inside the building,several top administrators, including Pres¬ent Levi, Deans O’Connell and Booth,vice-president in charge of public affairsCharles Daly, and master of the new colle¬giate division (NCD) James Redfield wereneeting.Asked how the Chickenshits knew of theneeting, one said “It was sheer accident.First we went to Dean Johnson’s office.Then we went to the center for continuingeducation and conducted a guided tour for[he rest of the Chickenshits. Then we wentto Levi’s house, but no one was there. Wefinally ended up at the Quad Club, and . . .wow! Jackpot!”At 3:05, several administrators who hadbeen staring out the windows at the dem¬onstrators began to file down the stairs.The Chickenshits, unsure as to which doorthe exiting officials would use, sent mem¬bers to cover the back and alley doors,while keeping a large force at the frontdoor. The administrators came out thefront door, and filed out between Chick¬enshits chanting “We love you,” “61,and “Come out, Black Bart, we knowyou're in there.”An unidentified blond man in a cam-elhair coat shoved two members of theband against the wall of the antechamberbetween the two main doors of the QuadClub as the administrators left. The in¬cident took place after the demonstratorshad not relinquished quickly enough theirposition outside the main door. The sameman was later seen talking to one of thecruising Chicago police.Several of the men jumped into an autoand sped off east on 57th, followed by fourChickenshits in a small foreign car. At thispoint, one of the men who had come frominside the building stopped Chicago policecar number 9584, which had been cruisingby, and pointed east, waving his arms. Thepolice car turned around and seemed to befollowing the other two autos.Dean Booth and Julian Levi, brother ofEdward and professor of urban studies andexecutive director of the south east Chi¬cago Commission, then got involved in a rather informal discussion with severalChickenshits. Julian Levi pointed his pipeat several of the students and said “You’reall very badly in need of psychiatric care.”He also pointed to the students surroundinghim and shouted “You’re 62, you’re 63,you’re 64 . ..”One student said that he thought a con¬versation out in the open could be moreuseful than anything that had happened sofar. Levi said “Look, do me a favor, forgettwo words. Forget the word ‘relevant’ andforget the word ‘dialog’.”Another young man said to Dean Booth,“If you were a student, and you were in aposition where you were surrounded bythings you disagreed with, and you had ab¬solutely no power, what would you do?”Booth replied “If I were a student insuch a position I would demonstrate peace¬fully, carry placards, protest in a civilizedmanner, and object in every peaceful waypossible.”Kristen Carlson, 71, said “We representa group that really wants to make this uni¬versity a good place. I feel very frustratedin that it seems we cannot move the powerstructure that makes it what it is and thatpower is not either students or faculty.”Booth then suggested that he, Levi, andseveral students should retire to Booth’soffice for a further discussion. Earlier the Chickenshits had entered theoffice of D Gale Johnson, dean of the so¬cial science division. Finding him out tolunch, they waited in the secretaries’ roomand sucked on the candy which Johnsonkeeps for his visitors. “If you can’t havepower, have some candy,” one of the dem¬onstrators remarked.When Johnson arrived he invited the stu¬dents into his office. Steve Kindred, actingas spokesman for the group, informedDean Johnson that “in the interests of the Phil Lathroppresent situation we believe that certain ofyour secret files, especially the onemarked ‘Rand Corp Confidential’ should beopened for public discussion. You wouldmake things much easier if you handedthem over.”Johnson, who had previously referred tothe group as the “fowl feces,” respondednegatively. At this point the Chickenshitswent down on their hands and knees andexited chanting “Grovel, grovel, grovel;who are we to question power?”Gray Committee Discussion ContinuesHanna Gray, associate professor of his¬tory and chairman of the department, con¬firmed yesterday that the report of theGray committee will be ready early nextweek.Five days ago, the Gray committee saidits report would be ready in ten days.The Gray committee was formed byJohn Wilson, dean of faculties, to in¬vestigate the validity of the decision of thesociology department not to rehire MarleneDixon. Mrs Gray stated that the com¬mittee’s investigations have not been in¬fluenced by the current administrationbuilding sit-in. She and several other mem¬bers of the committee talked to students inthe sit-in Friday, but according to MrsRudeness Causes Facu Ity Resignation Gray, “the sit-in has not changed ourfocus.”When the report is ready, it will first besubmitted to Wilson and to D Gale John¬son, dean of the division of social sciences.Mrs Gray stated that Johnson has told herhe is “committed to very serious consid¬eration” of the committee’s findings.As part of its investigations, the Graycommittee has solicited student opinion.“We’ve been enormously impressed,” MrsGray said, by the number of responses.”The committee has received responsesfrom faculty as well as from individualstudents.Other members of the Gray committeeare Robert Fogel, professor of economics,Jacob Getzels, professor of education andpsychology, Jelen Perlman, professor ofsocial service administration, Stuart Rice,professor of chemistry, Susanne Rudolph, assistant professor of political science, andM Brewster Smith, chairman of the de¬partment of psychology.Psychs Supports Sit-InThe Hyde Park Psychologists for SocialAction passed a resolution yesterday sup¬porting the sit-in and calling for amnestyfor the demonstrators.Members of the group stated that theysupport the demands and the tactics of thesit-in calling the “alienation of individualsfrom the large impersonal institutions inwhich they live and work as one of themost urgent problems of our times.”The press release also denounced thestatements of various members of the psy¬chological professions, specifically BrunoBettelheim’s charge that the mass para¬noia of students’ demonstrations lead toNazism as irresponsible.Daniel Boorstin, the historian whose ap¬pointment as director of the SmithsonianInstitution’s National Museum of History,rwas announced last week, is leaving theUniversity at least partly in response tostudent protests, several faculty membersreport., Boorstin was widely assumed to haveplayed a major role in the history depart¬ment’s decision against rehiring radicalhistorian Jesse Lemisch two years ago.The resulting controversy has been com¬pared to the Marlene Dixon case. Boorstin was sharply criticized by radi¬cal students for some time after the deci¬sion, to the point that he was almost afraidto go to soc tea, according to facultyfriends.One time, according to reports, Boorstinwas in soc tea and a student, apparentlydisgruntled by the Lemisch decision cameup to him and said: “You’re a pile of shit.”The professor is supposed to have askedlater (in the University of Chicago man¬ner), “What was I to say? — ‘What kind ofshit?’ ”Keep “Kool” In JJohn’s Warm Wear *BELL BOTTOMSJockey Turtleneckswith thiscoupon $1.75GIGANTIC SPORTCOAT SALEDouble breastedand Edwardians^JOHN'SMENS WEAR1459 E. 53 rd. BOSTON COLLEGE INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY2nd ANNUAL EXPEDITION TO TELL MEGAUIM(FOLLOWED BY AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL TOUR OF GREECE)JUNE 15-JULY 31st, 1969EXCAVATING A PHOENICIAN CITY OF THE 5th CENTURY B.C.LIVING IN A KIBBUTZ (COLLECTIVE SETTLEMENT)VISITS TO THE DEAD SEA AND CAVE OF THE SCROLLSTOURS OF ISRAEL AND THE WEST BANK OF THEJORDANLECTURES BY LEADING AMERICAN AND ISRAELI ARCHAEOLOGISTSTRIPS TO CAESAREA, SEBASTIYA, MASARA AND THE LOST CITIESIN THE DESERTLIVING IN THE CITY OF JERUSALEMA TOUR OF THE ANCIENT CITIES OF GREECEPARTICIPANTS IN THIS EXPEDITION CAN EARN 6 CREDITSTOWARDS A BACHELOR'S OR A GRADUATE DEGREE.FOR INFORMATION AND APPLICATION FORMS, WRITE ORCALL DR. DAVID NEIMAN, DIRECTORBOSTON COLLAGE INSTITUTE OF ARCHEOLOGYCHESTNUT HILL, MASS. 02167 Fosters mat FeatureA New concept 01“Social Awareness"Thought-provoking posters in bril¬liant colors and a variety ofshapes quote from such diversesources as Whitman, Camus, ande. e. cummings.INDIVIDUAL "LOVE" POSTERSALL YOU NEED IS LOVE22" x 34" $1.50BE OF LOVE A LITTLE MORE CAREFUL22" x 34" $1.50FOR ALL THAT HAS BEEN, THANKS11" x 34" $1.00THE GREATEST GOODWE CAN DO FOR OTHERS22" x 34" $1.50... A PIECE OF GOOD NEWS11" x 34" $1.00THE "CREATIVITY" POSTERS16 8" * 8" posters, the backs of which,put together, form a large 32" x 32"poster $2.25THE "RELATIONSHIP" POSTERS16 circular posters, 11" indiameter, printed on both sides,can be used as mobiles $2.98Co-published with Full CircleAssociotes and Liturgical PressNow at your favorite poster storeassociation press FLIGHTSJune,AugustFlightstoEuropeSeptemberreturnsCall Ext.3598,1-5:30 P.M.Nbryary 6,1969/Th* Chicago Maroon/3"Ask Denial of AmnestyBy Milton Friedman and T W SchultzThe council of the University senate hasre-affirmed the University’s longstandingpolicy that disruptive acts which go beyondlegitimate means of communication or per¬suasion are prohibited and that any stu¬dent who engages in such an act be sub¬jected to appropriate disciplinary action,not excluding expulsion. We, the under¬signed, agree fully with this policy. As aresult, we approve the procedures that arenow in process to enforce the establishedrules of order within the University.We share the compassion and the desirefor an early and peaceful settlement thatmoves those who are urging amnesty. Thatcompassion and that desire require thatthe discipline meted out be as light as willserve effectively to discourage the use ofthe tactics of force and coercion, and beproportioned to the guilt of those involved.But concern for the rest of our students,for students to come, and for the pre¬servation of a civilized and free society de¬mands that the discipline be strongenough, and prompt enough, to discouragethe use of these tactics. Nothing else willdo.The granting of amnesty would be a po¬litical judgment that would interfere withthe orderly procedures that are now under¬way. More basically, it would be a tacitacknowledgment that the offense of thepersons who are sitting-in is trivial; thatthe seizure of property, the denial of itsuse to other members of the Universitycommunity, and the refusal to use theexisting channels for change, are appro¬priate tactics for influencing Universitypolicy.The offense is not trivial; these tacticsare not appropriate. On the contrary, thereAnti-Sitters To RallySome 20 students against the sit-in areorganizing for an anti-sit-in rally to be heldon Friday at 12.30 in front of the adminis¬tration building.The group, as yet unnamed, stated thatthey are specifically concerned about thetactics. The anti-sitters-in released apamphlet implying that the demonstratorsare only concerned with destroying theUniversity and that they must be stopped.Most of the members of the ad hoc groupare members of Pierce Tower and otherdorms. are few offenses that strike more directlyat the vitals of a university, that moredirectly threaten the commitment to rea¬son, persuasion, and free discussion thatare the only justification for the existenceof the University, for the resources devotedto it, and the special privileges it claims.To condone these tactics, explicitly or im¬plicitly, is to cooperate willingly in the de¬struction of the very foundations of ourgreat University.(Milton Friedman is Russell distinguishedservice professor of economics, has ad¬vised Dwight Eisenhower, Barry Gold-water, and Richard Nixon. TheodoreSchultz is Hutchison distinguished serviceprofessor of economics.) Against Sit-InMilton Friedman, right facing camera, and Julian Goldsmith talked to newsmenyesterday, denoucing the sit-in in the ad building. Friedman is the Paul SnowdenRussell distinguished service professor of economics, and Goldmith is chairmanof the geophysical sciences department.Demonstrators Continue To Exist In Ad BldgBy Wendy GlocknerLynda stood barefoot in bluejeans and aT-shirt, nibbling on a peanut butter andjelly sandwich. “You know,” she said mat-ter-of-factly, “I’ve suffered from con¬stipation and diarrhea alternately duringthe past six days. I mean Woodward Courtfood may be greasy, but at least it’s some¬what nourishing. Here we have peanut but¬ter for breakfast every morning.”Like the majority of students in the adbuilding, Lynda, a second-year student,had never participated in a sit-in before.Students in the administration buildingview their situation humorously. The firstsign which greets those who filter throughthe building proclaims: “Welcome to theHoward Miller Hilton.”Even if students in the ad building havecreated a cohesive, compatible community,the atmosphere in no way resembles life atthe Hilton — not even Howard Miller’s.“I was completely unprepared for thetype of life that I found myself faced withwhen I walked into the ad building at noonThursday,” Lynda said. Looking a littlepallid, she explained the plight the stu¬dents face. “With a shortage of money anda huge quantity of people to feed, we haveto buy really cheap food in large quan¬tities.” A food committee has been organized topurchase groceries. They usually buymany loaves of bread, huge jars of peanutbutter and jelly, large salamis, cheese, andsoup. Students have been drinking coffee,lemonade, and bug juice. Apples, oranges,and carrots are also plentiful. Sundaymorning, bagels and cream cheese was themenu. Ingrates asked “Where is the lox?”The floor on which Lynda stood wasstrewn with old newspapers and somewhatThursday, February 6LECTURE: "Youth as a Stage of Life", Kennith Kenis-ton. Department of psychiatry, Yale. Cobb 209,11:30.LECTURE: "Student Movements in Different Societies:a Comparative Analysis", Richard Flacks,department of sociology. Cobb 209, 11:30.MEETING: Political science underground, Cobb 115 4pm.ISRAELI FOLK DANCING: teaching and requests,Hillei, 7:30-9.LECTURE: "Jewish Law and Modern Medicine", RabbiRonald Lubofsky, Hillei. 8 pm.MEETING: Ski club. MeetiMovie and ski trip plan forFebruary 9. 3rd floor Ida Noyes, 8 pm.MEETING: WRAP, to discuss establishment of a daycare center. Ida Noyes, 8 pm.DOC FILMS: "Riot in Cell Block 11", Cobb Hall 8 pm.DISCUSSION: "Special Problems of the ContemporaryAfro-American Artist", Mr J Hughie Lee-Smith,Classics 21, 8 pm. caked with mud. Students were continuallysweeping up the dirt. As she bent down tosweep the dirt into yesterday’s issue of theMaroon, Lynda commented that “by sani¬tary conditions we’re not the cleanest. Butin view of the amount of kids we havesitting in, we’ve kept this place'relativelyclean.”Allege Inaccurate NewsA group of University students yesterdaypointed out alleged inaccuracies in news¬paper coverage to members of the edito¬rial staffs of the Chicago Tribune and Chi¬cago’s American. They requested that theerrors be explicitly retracted by the pa¬pers.The editors said they would study thematter, according to Margaret Proctor,member of the delegation of the Ad HocCommittee for Accurate Journalism andgraduate student of education.The committee circulated a petition oncampus Tuesday containing copies of in¬accurate stories from the two newspapersand “denouncing the slipshod, irrespon¬sible and sensationalist reporting of recentevents at the University.” In one day, ac¬cording to Miss Proctor, 1,425 signatureswere collected, including 75 faculty signa¬tures.OT!»VvV'vyw.li,:ni VARSITYF CHICAGOJlrchlvesThe issOes are clearly established: on theone hand we see the warden and thenecessity for discipline,- on the other, theprisoners, using violence as their onlyweapon in the fight for better conditons.The impasse is real and inevitable whileconditions last.Don Siegel's RIOT IN CELL BLOCK 11,Tonight, 8:00 P.M. Cobb Hall, 75‘,Doc Films. FUN WORKING IN EUROPEGUARANTEED JOBS ABROAD! Get paid, travel, meet people,SUMMER and YEAR ROUND. 20 countries, 9 paying job cate¬gories offered. For FREE cultural program literature includingdetails and applications, write: ISIS, Admissions, 133 rue Hoteldes Monnaies, Brussels 6, Belgium. A Non-Profit Student Mem¬bership Organization.THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEMPrograms for American students—1969/70(Some Scholarships and Fellowshios Available)ONE YEAR STUDY PROGRAM-for college sophomores, ^juniors and recent graduates.GRADUATE STUDIES—Master's and Doctoral programs.REGULAR STUDIES-toward B.A. and B.S. degrees.FRESKMAN/PREPARATORY YEAR-for high schoolgraduates.SUMMER COURSES-given in English. hfor applications and information:OFFICE OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS / AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY11 EAST 69 STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10021/ 212 - 988 8400 Xxir roommatecant sleepin the dark?Think it over, over coffee.TheThink Drink.For your own Think Drink Mug. send 75C and your name and address to:Think Drink Mu|. Dept. N. P O. Bo« 559. Ne»Yo,k. N Y. 10046. The lnt»rn»|,on*l Coff«*Or*»<"«,,,®lv4/The Chicago Maroon/February 6, 1969