Disciplinary Committee Procedures InvestigatedBy Rob CooleyThe faculty disciplinary committeedropped a bombshell into the campus'crisis when it granted a motion to requiresomeone to defend the decision to declarethe sit-in “disruptive.”That ruling Monday afternoon was one ofa series which declared the independenceof the disciplinary committee and designedits own view of its function.Whether the bomb will go off. and whatwill become of 61 sitters-in notified Tues¬day by mail of their temporary suspen¬sions, probably will not be revealed untilopen hearings resume next Monday.Born in storm on day one of the sit in,the faculty disciplinary committee almostimmediately became the center of a sec¬ond storm of controversy partly of its ownI making.Two of its four student observers quit inprotest and were replaced Friday noon.Friday afternoon, students demonstratedat the law building, where hearings werebeing held, and law students and some lawfaculty mounted a heavy protest of com¬mittee procedures. ANALYSISThe nine faculty members of the com¬mittee were appointed at a special meetingof the committee of the council of the Uni¬versity senate Thursday morning.Four observing student members whohad served on previous disciplinary com¬mittees by appointment of the student gov¬ernment, were also appointed.The committee first met at noon Thurs¬day. After a discussion of method, hear¬ings opened.An initial committee decision to holdonly closed hearings, coupled with no defi¬nition of procedure and charges that its adhoc procedures were hasty and unfair, setoff much of the protest.Following the Friday protest, the com¬mittee attempted to meet both objections.It decided, Friday afternoon, to hold open hearings for those students who re¬quested them, and had its first one forthree or four students that afternoon.At that open hearing, law studentsspokesmen for summoned studentspresented a series of motions demandingthat reasonable procedural safeguards beaccepted and defined by the committee.The committee continued the cases andtook the motion under advisement.In twelve-hour-a-day discussions Satur¬day and Sunday, the committee consideredits procedures and function.Sunday night, the committee issued awritten statement in essence agreeing tofollow procedures of past disciplinary com¬mittees and to add some new safeguardsfor students.In a telephone interview Sunday evening,committee chairman Dallin Oaks, profes¬sor of law, said that “the University dis¬ciplinary committee’s procedures haveconformed to or are fairer than the pre¬vious practices outlined in the dean of stu¬dents memorandum.”Also on Sunday night, however, the com¬mittee announced it had suspended 61 stu¬ David TravisDALLIN OAKSDiscipline Chairmandents who had received summons and notanswered them, tending their appearancefor hearings. That decision stirred up newcontroversy and aroused the ire of a num¬ber of law students who protested it as aprocedural method.At renewed open hearings before stu-Continued on Page ThreeTHE MAROONVolume 77, Number 35 The Chicago Maroon Wednesday, February 5, 1969More Proposals Roll Out of Ad BldgDavid TravisXD BUILDING: Security guard keep in contact with other demonstrators.'ISA Demands Higher Student Rolely Mitch Bobkin ~Tne University of Chicago chapter of the' -A! ’ (NSA)a t i o n a 1 Students Associationassed seven resolutions Mon. night fon-"rning student power in faculty hiring andie disciplinary committee.Copies of the resolutions have been sent} the deans of all divisions. Two deans of•udents were consulted, according to NSAresident Bill Phillips and they voiced nohjections to the following proposals con¬ning student power:• In each division and academic unitJads should be provided to enable stu-ents in that unit to hire faculty membersf their choice as special professorial lec¬hers for a renewable one-year period.• Negotiations could be handled by thetudent council in each unit.• Invitations would be determined ei-ler by some system of proportional votingr by student petition.Faculty reaction to proposals according to Danny Boggs, member of NSA andteaching fellow in the law school, has beenenthusiastic especially over the first pro¬posal.Four other resolutions that were ap¬proved deal specifically with the dis¬cipline:• We demand that the University dis¬ciplinary committee and the University ad¬ministration assert their support of andcompliance with Section VI (“ProceeduralStandards in Disciplinary Proceeding”) ofthe “Joint Statement on Rights and Free¬doms of Students” enacted by the 20th Na¬tional Student Congress (1967) and ratifiedby the American Association of UniversityProfessors.• We demand that the University dis¬ciplinary committee be immediately re¬constituted to include a significant numberof voting student members, to serve at theoption of individual defendants.Continued on Page Four By Jim HaefemeyerAfter midnight Tuesday administrationbuilding demonstrators voted overwhelm¬ingly not to leave the building Wednesday,and took action on several of their pro¬posals.They decided not to give up the build¬ing, but instead to maintain a force insidewhile most demonstrators circulated oncampus to explain the aims of the sit-inand drum up support.They voted not to try to use social scienceroom 122 for liberation classes. They de¬layed consideration of proposals to hold aFaculty ViewsFuture of UCBy Sylvia PiechockaA closed faculty meeting Tuesday wasadjourned due to the presence of studentsin the balcony.The meeting was called to discuss thecurrent situation on campus and was votedclosed by a 2-1 vote because the facultyfelt that with the presence of outsiders fac¬ulty members would hesitate before speak¬ing. Theodore Lowi, professor of politicalscience made the speech against an openmeeting.The first proposal was made by EugeneGendlin, assistant professor in the depts ofpsychology and philosophy who suggestedan endorsement, in the spirit of PresidentLevi’s statement of Jan 29, of the principleof student participation and the endorse¬ment of the principle of the legitimacy ofstudent participation in developing generalpositive change in institutional patterns.He said that the demonstration was not alocal problem but worldwide. “Why can’twe give some kind of historical answer tothis kind of historical event. I propose wemake some kind of positive response (ap¬plause) which should be implemented inthe college divisions,” he added.Rickard Flacks, assistant professor ofContinued on Pago Four student government plebicite on the sit-inissues, and to paint the inside of the adbuilding purple before leaving it.In other late night developments:• Several demonstrators claimed theyhad been suspended by the disciplinarycommittee even though they had neverbeen given summons.• The council of the university senatemet and reaffirmed an earlier statementby the committee of the council that theadministration and faculty are willing totalk with “qualified students” but are notwilling to bargain under pressure, accord¬ing to council member and spokesman Ed¬ward Rosenheim.The fifty-one members of Universitycouncil senate met Tuesday night in theCenter for Continuing Education.Edward H. Levi, president of the Univer¬sity, refused to comment on the meeting.There were rumors that the council haddecided to take no further action againstthe demonstrators but decided to wait forit to fizzle out.A general meeting of demonstratorsbroke up at 10:30 pm to discuss eight pro¬posals in smaller caucus groups such asSDS and the “realists.” They were to re¬convene at 11:30 to vote on all proposalswhich require a two-thirds majority topass.A demonstrators’ attempt to meet withmembers of the administration yesterdaywas thwarted when deans refused to dis¬cuss the issues as l8ng as the students re¬mained in the ad building.The students, members of the negotiat¬ing committee in the ad building, at¬tempted to negotiate with the deans yes¬terday at 6 pm in the social science lounge.Present at the meeting were WayneBooth, dean of the college, and severaldeans of the divisions.According to Sally Yagol, ’70, the meet¬ing was preliminary to a meeting with Ed¬ward Levi. “We said we were willing todiscuss the issues with them,” she said af¬ter the meeting. “They said me issues cannot even be discussed or negotiated as longContinued on Page Four20 Protest Local Papers' CoverageAbout 20 University students are plan¬ning to protest Chicago Tribune and Chi¬cago’s American coverage of the sit-in thismorning in a meeting with officials ofthose papers.The meeting is to be followed at 11 amby a press conference in the lobby of theTribune building to publicize alleged in¬accuracies and distortions in coverage.The informal protest group has re¬ quested a 10:30 am meeting with the cityeditors of the two newspapers, but, accord¬ing to group member Margaret Proctor,did not know Tuesday afternoon whetherthe newspapers would agree.She said the press conference would beheld in any case.The group is circulating a petition oncampus, which includes reprints from thepapers and statements of fact and from University officials which indicate theirfalsehood or misleading nature.Meanwhile, a group of moderate studentspicketed the Sun-Times and Daily Newsbuilding Saturday to protest what theycharged was failure by those papers topresent their side of the Dixon con¬troversy.The Tribune, in its lead story in the Fri¬day early morning edition, stated that stu-Business School Rejects TacticsBusiness school students at an openmeeting Monday condemned the tactic ofsitting in, but expressed sympathy with thedemonstrators and some of their aims andurged the administration to “innovate acompromise solution.”Students at the meeting also recommend¬ed amnesty for sitters-in, and refused toendorse a business school faculty resolu¬tion supporting the administration’s standon the sit-in.Monday’s business meeting was calledfor Friday, following a two-hour studentmeeting where the sit-in was discussed.About 100 business students voted onnine resolutions formulated during Mon¬day’s three-hour meeting. However, meeting co-chairman RaymondTrue estimated that several hundred stu¬dents were present at various times.True estimated that one third of the busi¬ness faculty attended the meeting and par¬ticipated in discussion.“Some professors dismissed classes oriold their students they were free to attendthe meeting instead of class.“Demonstrators were invited from the adbuilding at both the Friday and Mondaymeetings, and explained their positions andanswered questions,” True said.Industrial relations students, accordingto True, responded to a professor’s remarkthat “the University can’t negotiate with agun at its head.”Teach-In Features LyndStaughton Lynd, Richard Flacks, MelRothenberg, Bob Ross, and Marlene Dixonwere among the speakers at the New Uni¬versity Conference teach-in held yesterdayafternoon in Cobb coffee shop.The program was organized to givepeople from the New Left movement in thecity and faculty members a chance to ex¬press their views on the current issues.The issues discussed included the educa¬tional experience taking place in the adbuilding, the circumstances that broughtabout the sit-in, the cases of teachers with¬out tenure being fired because of politicalviews, justification of the sit-in, urbanhousing and the University in Woodlawn,and the question of student-faculty power.Staughton Lynd said, “I’d just like to saysomething on behalf of those in the admin¬istration building who know what truly isto be feared in passing by on the other sideof a person who is in distress selling one’smanhood or womanhood for the sake of acareer or a draft deferment.”He compared the situation to ten days inthe Bolshevik revolution: “incessant talk,talk, talk, incessant education, education,education of those volunteers in the build¬ing.”The difference in this game, he said isthat the consequences of the actions arereal — “a breathtaking new experience atthe University of Chicago.“I do not ‘support the sit-in to the best ofmy ability,’ V he said. “I am part of it.”Richard Flacks said that the sit-in is nota result, but a fundamental challenge tothe University. “Unless this is recognized as the core of the problem, no solution willbe reached.”John Butler, psychology professor andmember of human developmentsaid,“Anybody who saw the Gray com¬mittee appointed should have known thatwas a move to reappoint her. We’re afraidthe committee might not get that point. Ithink they would be crazy not to appointher.”WRAP SponsorsOpen DiscussionAs part of the action generated about theproblem of women’s liberation in thepresent sit-in, the Women’s Radical ActionProject (WRAP) will sponsor a generalopen meeting Thursday at 8 pm in IdaNoyes hall.The main topic of discussion will be theestablishment of a day care center for chil¬dren of employees, students, and faculty.Members of WRAP said that they havebeen speaking about this possibility for thepast two months with University employ¬ees, and that they have found “consid¬erable interest” in the project. The centerthey envision would be funded solely bythe University with final decision-makingpower in the hands of women using thisfacility.They also stated that “child care facil¬ities are a reasonable service for every in¬stitution to provide free of charge, andlack of such facilities creates an oppres¬sive situation for women connected withthat institution.”Demonstrators List DemandsStudent demonstrators have madeseven demands during the past fourweeks; four are non-negotiable and'three are subject to negotiation. Thefour non-negotiable demands are:• Rehire Marlene Dixon (passedby the Committee of 85 Jan 9).• Equal student power over hiringand firing of faculty (passed by Com¬mittee of 85 Jan 9).• Pay compensation for all em¬ployees in the ad building during thesit-in (passed Jan 29 by the Commit¬tee of 444).• Amnesty f o r demonstrators(passed Jan 30 by students in adbuilding).The three negotiable demands, which were passed Monday, are:• The formation of a “suppressedstudies” department in the College tooffer courses in discriminationagainst women, workers, and blacks.• The quota of 51 percent regard¬ing women faculty and admitted stu¬dents.• The opening of all Universityfiles.Several proposals of principle werepassed Monday. They are:• To end destruction, start con¬struction in Woodlawn,• Opening a day care center forchildren of faculty members,• Admission of workers, blacks,and third world people. The gun analogy was a bad one, theyfelt, and they pointed out that unions andmanagements often negotiate under strikeor lock-out conditions, True said; and thatearly in the labor movement, workers’rights to strike and negotiate were ques¬tioned.That discussion issued in one of themeeting’s most important resolutions,passed by a 46-20 vote: “We advise theadministration not to itself close down theUniversity; not to carry on ad hoc tribun¬als; not to expel sit-in students from theUniversity; and to innovate a compromisesolution to be offered to the Universitycommunity.”Other resolutions deplored the takeoverof the ad building (passed 63-24); recom¬mended amnesty (passed. 52-43); recom¬mended the University “immediately ejectthe students” from the building (defeated,9-75); and fully supported the demands ofthe sit-in students and the sit-in action(also defeated, 16-72).A sixth resolution said that while busi¬ness students would not choose to occupy abuilding, “nevertheless, we are in sympa¬thy with the students employing this tacticto the extent that we applaud their re¬solve,” asked the students “not to closedown the University but instead to use thesit-in as a time for creative learning,” andalso asked that they not “commit criminalacts.” It passed, 43-27. dents had been “rifling” files in the admin¬istration building.Spokesmen for the sit-in say the files areoff-limits to the students, and have pub¬lished a handbill to this effect. This report¬er, during more than 20 hours in the ad¬ministration building, has never seen anyone opening or attempting to open a filecabinet or file drawer. Nor have any otherof the Maroon’s reporters in the building,they say.When asked about this, two Tribune re¬porters, who declined to give their names,said that they knew nothing about the sto¬ry, and that it had been received from theCity News Bureau, a city-wide, local newsservice. A City News Bureau representa¬tive was unavailable for comment.The Tribune story also said studentsbroke into President Edward Levi’s office,and went through his files. In fact, accessto Levi’s office is blocked by doors whichhave remained locked.Both references were dropped in latereditions of the Tribune.The American, in its Sunday morningedition, issued Saturday night, carried astory by a man and wife team, who hadslipped upstairs in the building past stu¬dent security. The story said that “.. .thesmell of marijuana was quite distinct.”The woman said she recognized the aromafrom having noted the same smell in theair in Lincoln Park during the DemocraticConvention disorders.The American reporter at the building,when questioned about it, smiled and said,“I don’t believe that. I don’t think shesmelled a thing, except maybe a little in¬cense.”In the first Wednesday edition of theTribune it was reported that PresidentLevi had lunch Tuesday with all the deansA spokesman for the University said thiswas “completely inaccurate,” that in factthe president was having lunch with EddieWilliams, assistant vice president for de¬velopment and public affairs.Wednesday, February 5LECTURE (department of obstetrics and gynecology),Dr Roberto Caldeyro-Barcia, professor andchairman, department of physiopathology andservice of obstetrical physiology, facultymedicine, University of Uruguay. "Test of fetaltolerance to uterine contractions." Dora De LeeHall, 12:30 pm.THE CHICAGO MAROONEditor: Roger BlackBusiness Manager: Jerry LevyNews Editor: Caroline HeckManaging Editor: John RechtPhotography Editor: David TravisDay Editor: Mitch BobkinNight Editor: Sue LothNews Board:Ad Building: Wendy GlocknerFaculty: Sylvia PiechockaUndergraduate Students: Chris FraulaGraduate Students: Rob CooleyAdministration: Richard ParoutaudDisciplinary Committee: Leslie StraussAd Building Bureau: Wendy Glockner (bureauchief), Jim Haefemeyer, Chris Lyon, BruceNorton, Paula Szewczyk, Leonard Zax.News Staff: Marv Bittner, Debby Dobish, ConHitchcock, CD Jaco, Blair Kilpatrick, SteveCook, Gerard Laval.Photography Staff: Phil Lathrep, Paul Stelter,Howie Schamest, Steve Aoki.Production Staff: Mitch Bobkin, Robin Kauf¬man, Leslie Strauss, Robert Swift, MitchKahn.Contributing Editors: John Welch, Michael Sor-kin, Jessica Siegel, John Moscow, RobertHardman, Barbara Hurst, David Aiken.Sunshine Girl: Jeanne WiklerFounded in 1892. Pub¬lished by University ofChicago students daily dur¬ing revolutions, on Tues¬days and Fridays through¬out the regular schoolyear and intermittentlythroughout the summer,except during examinationperiods. Offices in Rooms303, 304, and 305 in Ida Noyes Hall, 1212 E.59th St., Chicago, III. 60537. Phone Midway3-0800, Ext. 3269. Distributed on campus and inthe Hyde Park neighborhood free of charge.Subscriptions by mail $7 per year. Non-profitpostage paid at Chicago, III. Subscribers toCollege Press Service. LECTURE-SEMINAR: "Newer information on our un¬derstanding of Hodgkin's disease." Dr Saul ARosenberg, associate professor department ofmedicine and radiology, Stanford school ofmedicine: Dr Klaus Ranniger, associate pro¬fessor, departments of medicine and radiology;Dr Lawrence W Allen, instructor, departmentof medicine, Billings hospital, P-117, 12:30 pm.SEMINAR: (Department of physics). Professor R Ste¬phan Berry, department of chemistry, JamesFranck Institute. ‘‘Electron impact spectro¬scopy of molecules.'' Kent 103, 4 pm.LECTURE (Department of biochemistry — graduatetraining program), Burt Zerner, department ofchemistry and chemical engineering, biochem¬istry division. University of Illinois. "Jack beanurase." Abbott hall, 4 pm.DOC FILMS: "An evening with Laurel and Hardy,"Cobb hall 7 and 9:30 pm.FOLK DANCING: Country dancers, dances from theBritish Isles and Scandinavia, Ida Noyes hall,dance room, 8 pm.LECTURE (collegiate division of humariities-Africanand Black American Humanities Program),Hughie Lee-Smith, artist, "Afro-American Art¬ists of the Nineteenth Century.'' Classics 10,8:30 pm.WORKSHOPS: Teaching, curriculum, and role of stu¬dents in political science dept., 9:30, 12:30, 2.30,4:30. Ida Noyes Hall.LECTURE: Gerdes Kuhblack, "Financing of PublicAuthorities," Bus. East 103, 1 pm.LECTURE: Ar|un P Aggarwal, "Ghettos and theirsocial and political implications," 4:10 pmFoster Lounge.RECRUITING VISIT: Board of Higher Education ofthe Methodist Church, Nashville, Tenn. Call ext3282 for appointments.RECRUITING VISIT: Sears, Roebuck & Co., DataProcessing Div., Chicago. Call ext. 3284 for ap¬pointments.SEMINAR: Drug Education Pro|ect on psychodelic andnarcotic drugs, training program for drugcounselors and medical emergency staff. 8 pm.,Grace Church, 555 West Belden.MEETING: Sociology graduate students. "DepartmentRestructure." 7 pm. East Lounge, Ida Noyes.Outside ViewsThree Bennington students who havebeen roving around the country survey¬ing the student revolution during theirnonresident term, will be here to dis¬cuss what they have seen in the IdaNoyes east lounge starting at 3:30Wednesday. They are painting studentCarole Bolsey, history major RebeccaMitchell, and literature major ChristineGraham.2/The Chicago Maroon/February 5,’ 1969Grads Discuss Specifics of Student PowerBy Rob CooleyDivinity SchoolThe weekly meeting of students in theethics and society field in the divinityschool passed a resolution Monday to “sup¬port amnesty for those students involved inthe occupancy of the ad building,” and to“recommend that the Divinity School (stu¬dent (association take this matter up onWednesday” (at its weekly meeting.)(Maroon’s source: Vincent Pollard, eth¬ics and society student.)AnthropologyStudents met Friday with faculty to dis¬cuss sit-in and departmental changes. Stu¬dents met alone again on Monday and offi¬cially elected student representatives to afaculty-student committee on departmentalreform. Student representatives of thatcommittee will meet Tuesday, 7:30 pm. tocome up with concrete proposals; these tobe presented to open meeting of studentswhen possible, perhaps Friday. Student-faculty committee discussions will follow.A statement on the sit-in is being draftedby students.The anthropology department started to¬ward a student-faculty committee autumnquarter, but it was not constituted untilthis quarter. The first meeting was heldMonday Jan 27.(Maroon source: Judy Friedlander, stu¬dent member of student-faculty com¬mittee.) StatisticsDepartmental open meeting Monday wasattended by almost all faculty and stu¬dents. Discussed were disciplinary com¬mittee procedures, sit-in issues, student in¬volvement within department. Students feltthey did not want formal faculty-studentstructures; serving on committees wouldjust be boring. Informal channels were feltadequate.(Maroon source: Miron Straf, studentrepresentative on divisional council.)Political Science found the prevailing spirit “rational aswell as constructive.”Most faculty members expressed theirpleasure at the extent to which the work¬shop has focused on the problems of thediscipline and at the opportunity to learnwhat is in the minds of the students.The PSA has passed a resolution con¬cerning the sit-in and the demands in ques¬tion. This resolution, endorsed by a greatmajority of PSA members, supports thecommittee on human development in theirdesire to rehire Marlene Dixon and callsfor a re-opening of her case. The PSA alsodemanded amnesty for demonstrators.At the urging of the Political Science As- FduCOtionsociation (PSA) graduate classes in politi-cal science were called off Tuesday andWednesday to hold student-faculty work¬shops in Ida Noyes hall to discuss curricu¬lum, teaching, and student participation inthe political science department.John Strucker, president of the PSA said,“The nature of our education — in otherwords, what’s being taught, how it’s beingtaught, to whom it’s being taught, and why— are the issues that have come up. Weneed more than just committees to dealwith them.“The faculty has been reasonable, on thewhole, with their attitude that all thesequestions are negotiable,” Strucker said.Grant McConnell, chairman of the politi¬cal science department, said he was “deep¬ly impressed” with the workshop and Student-faculty committee (5 of each)has existed two years for general commu¬nication. It met Monday at the request ofstudents, decided to formalize one man-onevote by-laws, and to direct itself to the question of student participation in facultydecisions. The committee will have powerto make recommendations on this issueand submit them to grad students and fac¬ulty for separate referendums; they mustbe approved by both to become effective.An open faculty-student meeting isscheduled for Feb 15.(Maroon source: Vincent Tinto, studentco-chairman of student-faculty committee.)Geophysical ScienceAbout half of the students and faculty ofthe geophysical sciences department metyesterday to discuss various topics con¬cerning student-faculty relations. At themeeting the following proposal waspassed:“We disapprove of the present sit-in inthe administration building.”The vote was 39 to 2, with one absten¬tion.WRAP Raps Male ChauvinismThe problem of discrimination againstwomen was given extensive coverage at arally sponsored by Women’s Radical Ac¬tion Project (WRAP) Monday. Speakers in¬cluded Marlene Dixon and several mem¬bers of WRAP.Most of the remarks at the rally weredrawn from a position paper on the womenquestion that was endorsed by the adminis¬tration building sit-in.The position paper charges the Univer¬sity with a “consistent policy of dis¬crimination and exploitation of women” ofwhich Mrs Dixon’s case is one example.The paper also holds that women are chan¬neled into lower-paying jobs classified as“women’s work” and viewed as a “naturaloutgrowth of women’s proper role as ser¬vant in the home.”The University, the speakers charged,discriminates against women employees ona faculty and a non-faculty level. Marlene Dixon delivered a short historyof the two year old women’s liberationmovement, which developed after a “greatand unsettling discovery” made by womenactive in the civil rights movement in theearly ’60’s. “Women realized,” Mrs Dixonsaid, “that they struggled for freedom in afreedom movement but they were notfree.”Mrs Dixon was questioned about the sit-in and tactics. “In general I have not seenstudents initiate violence.” She maintaineda neutral position regarding the sit-in, stat¬ing, “It’s past history. I see little point incommenting on what might have been.”The rally concluded with remarks byWRAP member Sally Yagol, ’70. She said“Everyone in our capitalistic society is ei¬ther oppressed or an oppressor. Men aswell as women will be given a real possi¬bility of choice only through a radical res¬tructuring of society.”Oaks Defines Committee's FunctionsContinued from Page Onedents Monday morning, the committee willhear arguments on procedural motionsfrom law student spokesmen — essentiallythe same motions presented on Fridaythough ih more organized form. After fur¬ther deliberation on them, it announced itsruling late Monday afternoon.The committee’s Monday afternoon rul¬ings in addition to establishing proceduralsafeguards, appeared to be an effort to de¬fine and state its conception of its function.Three ruling were crucial.The decision to continue cases before ituntil a calmer atmosphere prevailed oncampus, so that the cases of individual stu¬dents would not be prejudiced by an at¬tempt to set an example, indicates that thecommittee refuses to regard itself as aninstrument for breaking up the sit-in. Re¬liable sources indicate that both the coun¬cil of the faculty senate and the adminis¬tration were less then pleased with this de¬cision.Oaks, in another telephone conversationMonday night, said that “the function ofthe discipline committee is to exercise anindependent and unbiased judgment onthe responsibilities of the University in act-■ng out the disciplinary proceedingsagainst students and to determine what, ifany, discipline is called for on the facts of each individual case prevented the com¬mittee.”Oaks is a man who weighs his words;the implications of that statement confirmthe decision of the committee not to be¬come involved in the politics of the crisesin any way.Oaks added: “The committee is not an‘intermediary’ between the ‘adminis¬tration’ and the students. That is not ourfunction.”The committee further asserted its inde¬pendence in at least two more rulings onMonday.It made no ruling on a motion for anappeal body, thus leaving that possibilityopen. And it agreed to require evidencefrom “the person who declared the demon¬stration disruptive” as to the basis of thatdeclaration.It is not yet clear whether the “person”is dean of students Charles O’Connell orthe council of University senate, and thequestion has been left open as to whetherthe decisions will be defended in public inwriting or in closed sessions of the com¬mittee.But that step, while it may not ultimate¬ly affect disciplinary proceedings shouldforce the administration to define its cri¬teria and its decison-making processes inan eventually public manner.And that would be quite a new event inthe history of University sit-ins. CHARTERFLIGHTSJune,AugustFlightstoEuropeSeptemberreturnsCall Ext.3598,1-5:30 P.M.OIOuReynolds Club BasementHours: Hon.—Fri; 9-10Sat: 12-6 1. You sure are my kind offolksinger, Fran.“Oh, a lonely minstrelI’m meant to be...” 2. Y’think maybe vou and mecould, uh, possibly...“A-singin’ my songto humanity...”3. I’ve alwaysadmired you.“Forever to roamis my destiny...” 4. And 1 was hoping thatperhaps, somehow, thefeeling might be mutual.“Without any need forcompany...”5. But I guess you’re just toowrapped up with vour music.“Alone, yes, aloneconstantly...” 6. It could have been beautiful,lx'cause 1 just got one ofthe great jobs Equitable isoffering college peoplethese days. Real gcxxl pay,challenging work, andpromotions that come asfast as I can earn them.Like to hear my versionof “Lead Me Downthe Aisle, Lyle”?Make an appointment through vour Placement Officer to see Equi¬table's employment representative on February 6, 11 & 12, 1%9 orwrite: Lionel \1. Stevens, Manager. College Employ ment.the InequitableThe Equitable Life Assuranc«**3ociety of the United States1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019An Equal 0)>portunity Employer, M/F 0 Equitable 1968February 5, 1969/Tho Chicago Maroon/3 ;— ———————-Faculty Questions University FutureContinued from Page Onesociology, followed with a proposal for stu¬dent recognition via negotiations and am¬nesty.Milton Friedman, Paul Snowden Russeldistinguished service professor of econom¬ics, columnist in Newsweek and economicadvisor to President Nixon, moved thethird proposal, saying, “The key issue isare we or are we not interested in the pre¬serving of this university. If we were totake the last motion of professor Flacks,make no mistake about it, that would be adestruction of the university.“Which one of you, gentlemen, would bewilling to be a faculty member at an in¬stitution where decisions are made bymass meetings such as we have seen inthe last few days,” Friedman continued inthe same spirit.“Which one of you, gentlemen, would bewilling to be a faculty member at an in¬stitution where you have to worry aboutwhether there are students in the balconytaking notes” (applause).Friedman finished his statement ex¬claiming “either the minority will be sup¬pressed by force or the minority will be¬come a majority and suppress the rest ofus.” Jonathan Kleinbard, assistant to CharlesDaly, said that it is very likely that Fried¬man will retract this statement at a pressconference Wednesday because he did notmean to say that the university should callthe police.Earlier in the meeting informationalquestions were raised. One of these dealtJohnson RefusesTo NegotiateContinued from Page Oneas we are in the ad building. One of thereasons we came into this building was toestablish a power base ... if we left it,our power would be gone.”After the meeting, D. Gale Johnson,dean of the division of social sciences, wasoverheard saying: “We aren’t even goingto say no. We aren’t going to say any¬thing.”Several members of the administrationhave stated that they are willing to talkwith the demonstrators now, but will onlynegotiate when the students leave the adbuilding. with the payroll. Wanye Booth, dean of thecollege and chairman of the meeting said,“By dint of special effort the university isgoing to be able to meet its payroll exceptfor temporary help.” This fact was to bewithheld but according to Booth the “ad¬ministration wants to play it straight.”It was further stated that an injunctionis not pending because the administrationfeels that such action would be “in thesame category as calling the police.”Continued from Page One• We demand that there b( created abody enpowered to review and modify disciplinary policy, such body having signifi¬cant voting student membership and hav¬ing as its primary purposes the safeguard¬ing of due process and civil liberty and theestablishment of student participation indefining punishable offenses.• We demand that the University ad¬ministration, including the office of the A report by Soia Mentschikoff gave thefacts on the disciplinary committee. Sheadvocated open hearings and suggestedthat students be allowed on the committee.She added, however, that she does “notdoubt the integrity and fairness” of theproceedings now that continuances andopen hearings have been granted.The meeting is to be continued at somelater, unspecified date where faculty willprobably vote on the motions presented.dean of students, assert its support of andcompliance with Section III (StudentRecords) of the joint statement.Section VI of the joint statement is acomplicated document which states thatstudents should be given due process andthat disciplinary committees should haveset procedures. Section III deals with thepermanent records of students being dis¬ciplined and says that academic and dis¬ciplinary records should be separate.NSA Demands Students Be GrantedVoting Role in Discipline Procedures(1 ]C F CHICAGOV ^Archives*11, i recruit top grads forwould you like totop jobs with atop company?WILL BE ON CAMPUSTUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18Hey, that’s our job! . . . and unlesssomebody is trying to tell us some¬thing, we don’t think we’re doing tooadly.Sure, Sun Oil Company needs alot more people—in Exploration, Pro¬duction, Manufacturing, Research,Engineering, Sales, Accounting, Eco¬nomics and Computer Operations.But there are unusual attractions.Besides excellent pay, generous stockplan, and especially good and econom¬ical living conditions in the Phila¬delphia; Toledo and Dallas areas,Sunoco is an exciting company towork for. This is the company that is pio¬neering with Great Canadian OilSands Ltd. the famed Athabasca oilsands project in Northern Alberta—a $235 million project that can multi¬ply the world’s petroleum resources.Also — that sponsors “Sunoco Spe¬cials” and the Penske/Donohue teamin major auto racing championshipsto competition-prove and developSunoco products for the public; thatis planning a new $125 million proc¬essing facility in Puerto Rico; ex¬panded its Toledo Refinery to the tuneof $50 million; pursues a continuingprogram for air and water pollution control; beautifies Sunoco servicestations throughout the land; andrecently broke through the billiondollar a year barrier in sales! Soundinteresting? Sun is geared foigrowth. Perhaps we could use youWrite us for an appointment, writefor our book “Sunoco Career Oppor¬tunities Guide,” or contact your Col¬lege Placement Director to see Sun’srepresentative when on campus. SunOil Company. Industrial RelationsDept. NE. 1608 Walnut Street, Phila¬delphia, Pa. 19103.An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F 9th Annual U of CFOLK FESTIVALEvening ConcertsFeb. 7,8, & 9 S:15 P.M.String Band ConcertFeb.* 3:15P.M.All ticket sales at Mandel HallWe have accepted to he tried by ills andtroubles, that ye may sanctify yourselvesfrom all earthly defilements, ft hy, then,refuse ye to ponder Our purpose in yourhearts? By the righteousness of God!It hose will reflect upon the tribulationsWe have suffered, his soul will assuredlymelt away with sorrow. Thy Lord Himselfbeareth witness to the truth of My words.We have sustained the weight of all cala¬mities to sanctify you from all earthlycorruption, and ye are yet indifferent.BAHA'II'LLAH4/The Chicago Maroon/February 5, 1969