Turn the Page for News.♦s * \elurnne 77, Number 21 Chicago, Illinois, Friday, November 15, 1968A- • t-! A %\_■INAUGURATION DAY: A smiling Edward Levi, a lecturing Edward Levi and an array of mortarboards were among the various scenes on Inauguration Day.Cohn A Stem©mutt & (SlamjniHShopIf you had just one sweater....this would lx* it. Our classic cable knit,V-neck wool fills the bill. In heather shades ofwheat or blue. By Alps, $20.IN THE HYDE PARK SHOPPING CENTER55th & LAKE PARKopen Thursday & Friday evenings SAAi AM AAIA6I 8E mAAM8&S ASS8&IASsnuAi imm aaxis.JUST A‘4 COVER CHARGETO SEETHE FOUR SEASONSin the EMPIRE ROOMDURING THANKSGIVING WEEK,MON., NOV. 25th thru SAT., NOV. 30thSpend Thanksgiving at our place and we'll giveyou plenty to be thankful for. Like our studentrates in the world-famous Empire Room, thehome of total entertainment, where you’ll see thesights and sounds of the stars. Thrill to the excitingFour Seasons . . . and dance to a sock-it-to-you rockband, too. (and your reservation is guaranteed!).SPECIAL STUDENT ROOM RATESYou’re also welcome to make The Waldorf-Astoria yourvacation headquarters. We’re right in the center-of-it-allwith the right rates!Per Person: Doubles *9.50/Triples *8Get with it. Get it all. Get it now.Call "BETTY LOU” at (212) 355-3000for guaranteed reservations."We know what’s happening”Park Ave. between 49th & 50th Sts.New York, N.Y. 10022The Chicago Maroon November 15, 1968 FLYING FLINGon OZARK, that isWith Ozark’s new Weekend Unlimited fare, youcan fly to any of Ozark’s over 50 cities and backagain for just $30 plus tax ... as many cities asyou want to visit, or just one city, . . . you nameitT- • • a real Flying Fling. Leave any timeSaturday, start your final flight before six P.Mthe next day. So get up and go .Call your travel agent or Ozark Air Lines.go-getters goOZARKAIR LINESEdAs Levi InauguratedUniversity PresidentMaroon — DAVID TRAVISHONORS: New President Levi awards honorary degrees at Inauguration,Students Protest at DinnerMaroon — DAVID TRAVIS-OCKTAIL PARTY: Hilton Dinner was preceded by cocktail hour. The inauguration of Edward Levi asPresident of the University was observedat a “civic” dinner in the Conrad HiltonWednesday evening by 2000 invited guestsinside the hotel and approximately 100 stu¬dents demonstrating outside.Guests arriving at the dinner had tocross a picket line at the main entrance.The side entrances were not blocked at all,however. The demonstration was organizedby the Students for a Democratic Society(SDS).Further student protest took place insidethe dinner, as students periodically got upfrom the main floor to interrupt speakers,particularly the main speaker, McGeorgeBundy, president of the Ford Foundation,former Harvard faculty member, and for¬mer adviser to Presidents Kennedy andJohnson.Other speakers at the dinner were Law¬rence A. Kimpton, former chancellor of theUniversity, George J. Stigler, Charles R.Walgreen Distinguished Service Professorof Economics, and Mr. Levi. Fairfax M.Cone, chairman of the board of trustees,presided.Guests at the civic reception and dinnerincluded trustees, alumnae, civic figures,and prominent faculty members. Approxi¬mately 150 students were invited.The demonstraters outside the hotelmarched in a circle carrying signs read¬ing, “Throw the Moneylenders Out,” andchanting slogans such as “1-2-3-4McGeorge Bundy made this war” and“Work, study, get ahead, kill.” There waslittle contact between guests and demon¬strators.Inside the hotel guests proceeded first toa reception and receiving line and thenwent on to dinner, which was uninter¬rupted by any protests.Kimpton was the first after dinnerspeaker. He opened his speech stating, “Itake pleasure in the fact that it is not myinauguration we’re celebrating.” Hisspeech was interrupted by a student whogot up and began addressing KimpionContinued on Page 11 By Caroline HeckEdward Hirsch Levi became the eighthpresident of the University of ChicagoThursday morning in Rockefeller Chapel.Fairfax M .Cone, chairman of the boardof trustees, inducted Levi as president atthe three hundred twenty fifth convocationceremony.The route of the procession to Rockefel¬ler Chapel was lined with students wholinked arms and displayed signs in obser¬vance of Thursday as a national day ofresistance, and in silent protest of Levi’sappointment, but the ceremoney prodetdedwith no disturbances.Rockefeller Chapel was filled for the in¬auguration ceremoney, which included aprocessional of university faculty and vis¬iting delegates from other schools, an in¬augural address by Levi, and the conferralof nine honorary degrees.Levi was unanimously elected presidentby the trustees in September of 1967. Hehas been a member of the University fac¬ulty since 1936 and is the first alumnus tobecome president of the University.He succeeds George Wells Beadle, Nobelprize-winning biologist, who came to theUniversity in 1961..Levi delivered an inaugural address thatdiscussed both the University’s relation tosociety and the distribution of control in theUniversity.“The mission of the University of Chi¬cago,” Levi stated, “is primarily the in¬tellectual search for truth and the trans¬mission of intellectual values.” Levi ac¬knowledged, however, that “this may beinsufficient to satisfy those who, for thetime being at least, and for laudable andunderstandable reasons, would prefer adifferent way of life.” He also noted thechange that has taken place in the questionof University neutrality on political ques¬tions, saying, “the propriety of the corpo¬rate neutrality of the University on publicpolicy issues having moral aspects hasbeen seriously challenged.”Speaking on the nature of the University,Levi quoted a statement made by formerpresident William Rainey Harper that “tothe faculties belong to the fullest extent fhecare of educational administration.” Levireiterated this idea himself, saying, “Istress the position of the faculty becauseobviously the quality of this Universityrests upon them and is created by them.”‘ The honorary degrees were awarded toBertrand Bronson, professor of English atthe University of California, Elias JamesCorey, professor of chemistry at Harvard,Murray Emeneau, professor of Sanskritand linquistics at Berkely, Raymond Firth,professor of anthropology at the LondonSchool of economics.Also Fleming James, Jr. law professorat Yale-Glen Alfred Lloyd, former chair¬man of the board of trustees here; RobertK. Merton, professor of sociology at Co¬lumbia University, George Palade, biologyprofessor at Rockefeller University; andKurt Weitzmann, professor of art and ar¬chaeology at Princeton University and amember of the Institute for AdvancedStudies.Maroon - DAVID TRAVISPRESIDENT LEVIHonored at Dinner‘ 3November 15; T968 The Chicago Maroon1 * A Vi * 4 * i A * \ScandinavianImportSystem10thAnniversarySaleFromSwedenA NewShipmentBrio ToysFromNorway .the amazingSavoy Flip-Flophidden LeafDining Table50” x 39”opens to 80”s165teak or walnutClosing OutThe Rondo Tablesame Flip-Flopleaf - ovalextends to 99”. teak or walnut*165StackingTablein teak 29Min rosewood 39”A rosewood diningtable 28" square,extends to over100"-similar tableadvertised by acompetitive shopfor $298 - ourevery day price -$179Please Compartour leathersofas and chairs 1. You sure are my kind offolksinger, Fran.“Oh, a lonely minstrelI’m meant to he...” 2. Y’think maybe you and mecould, uh, possibly...“A-singin’ my songto humanity...”3. I’ve alwaysadmired you.“Forever to roamis mv destiny...” 4. And I was hoping thatperhaps, somehow, thefeeling might be mutual.“Without anv need forcompany...”5. But I guess you’re just too 6. It could have been beautiful,wrapped up with your music. because I just got one ofthe great jobs Equitable isAlone, ves, alone offering college peopleconstantly... these days. Real good pay,challenging work, andpromotions that come asfast as I can earn them.Like to hear my versionof “Lead Me Downthe Aisle, Lvle”?Make an appointment through your PlacementOfficer to see Equitable's employment represent¬ative on Nov. 20 or write: Lionel M. Stevens,Manager, College Employment.firTHE UITABLEThe Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019An Equal Opportunity Employer, M/E 0 Equitable 1968 "My best shirts getripped to shredswhen I wear yourafter shave!'We keep warning you to be careful how you useHai Karate® After -Shave and Cologne. We even putinstructions on self-defense in every package. Butyour best shirts can still get torn to pieces. That’swhy you’ll want to wear our nearly indestructibleHai Karate Lounging Jacket when you wearHai Karate Regular or Oriental Lime.Just tell us your size (s,m,l) and sendone empty Hai Karate carton, with$4 (check or money order), for eachHai Karate Lounging Jacket to:Hai Karate, P.O. Box 41 A, Mt. Vernon,N.Y. 10056. That way, if someonegives you some Hai Karate, you canbe a little less careful how you use it.Send for yourpractically rip-proofHai KarateLounging Jacket.Allow 6 weeks for delivery.Offer expires April 1, 1969.If your favorite store is temporarily out of Hai Karate, keep asking.GOLD CITY INN* * * * Maroon"A Gold Mine of Good Food”IO %Student DiscountHYDE PARK’S BESTCANTONESE FOOD5228 HARPERHY 3-2559(Eat More For Less)ry our Convenient TAKE-OUT Orders AN INAUGURATION EVENTMANDtl HALlSaturday Evening/November 16, 1968, 8:00 PMJn Ci7 venin 9 of WusicL 3acuity an d St udentiin honor of Edward 3dirich r/CeviEasley Blackwood • Jan Herlinger‘John Cobb‘Collegium Musicum Motet Choir‘University Chorus‘University Symphony OrchestraiAdmission is Without ChargeTickets Availableat Informatioa Desk and Reynolds ClubThe Chicago Maroon November 15, 1968"Joan Baez haswritten a bookso real thatit makes onebelieve in 'miracles."-Saturday Review4th Big Printing.,rJf£.’Z THE DIAL PRESSE GREAT MOTHER SHIP IS COMING Three years ofJust three short years ago, our underground shop of uniqueimports has become a regular stop for knowledgeable HydeParkers.Only the ancient crafts of Africa, Latin America, India andAsia can offer the diversity and wealth of shof ~ing you findat Sticks and Stones. Hundreds of fascinating gifts. New de¬signs for giving, getting and living. Unusual and exoticjewelry, sculpture and handicrafts.New items arrive daily at Sticks and Stones from over 44countries - so the show is always changing.Everything is handicrafted. Everything is something veryspecial. Come discover your special treasure.A new international arts and crafts centerJEWELRY * HANDICRAFTS * SCULPTUREHarper Court 5210 S. Harper 324*7600Convenient hours: Noon to 8 p.m. daily; Noon to 5 p.m. SundayNovember 15, 1968 The Chicago MaroonComplete Text of the New President's AddressThe following is the text of the inauguralconvocation address delivered yesterday byPresident Edward H. Levi.I trust I will be forgiven a personalword I approach this unlikely momentwith many memories. I come to it alsowith understanble concern. I do not miscon¬ceive the importance of this office whichhas changed through the years. Rather the tion of special points of view might exist,Harper wrote, but they could not be calleduniversities. The emphasis on the need toquestion and reexamine, both as part ofthe inquiry of research and the inquiry ofteaching, established a basic unity for allof the University. The basis of that unityunderscored the relationship betweenteaching and research. That unity encour-goals, achievement and tradition of thisX aged discussion among disciplines. It sup-University are disturbingly impressive.Our University has had a standard of ex¬traordinary leadership, difficult to main¬tain I am grateful to Chancellor Hutchins,Chancellor Kimpton and President Beadlefor their presence today. They will under¬stand my anxiety. It is not that we fearmistakes. Perhaps we should fear not tomake them. President Hutchins in his ad-dress—given forty years ago—spoke of theUniversity's experimental attitude, its will¬ingness to try out ideas, to undertake newventures, to pioneer. In some cases, hesaid, the contribution was to show otheruniversities what not to do. Let me say,with rueful pride, since that time we have our institution: a willingnessmade many similar contributions. I hope^periment, a commitment for the in-we always will. tellectual search for truth, freedom of in-It is natural for this University to believe quiry, and a concern for the educationalit believes in pioneering. After all, this ^ process as though the freedom of man de-University came into being as a pioneeimg'^pended upon it .This is our inheritance. Itported the individual scholar as he crossedaccepted boundaries of knowledge. It madepossible — even compelled — continuingdebate concerning the place of profes¬sional, specialized, general and liberal edu¬cation within the University. It made theUniversity self-critical.“On an occasion such as this,” as Mr.Kimpton stated on a similar occasion, “theimportant roles are not played by thosewho are present. . . Our efforts are givenimportance by the opportunities and re¬sponsibilities. . .we inherit.” So I havestressed those virtues which from the be¬ginning and until now have characterizedinstitution: a willingness to ex-lirst modern University, borrowing ideasfrom Germany and England, building uponthe New England college, joining under¬graduate instruction and a panoply ofgraduate research in what, some said,surely would be a monstrosity — all thisdone with Middle Western enthusiasm anda confidence the best could be obtainedhere if only it could be paid for. Much hasbeen written of the financial arrangementsof those days, the creative use of materialresources generously given. But the basicfaith was not in material resources. Thefaith was in the intellectual powers of themind. It was considered important, moreimportant than anything else in the world,to uncover and understand the cultures ofthe past, to appreciate the works of themind, to penetrate the mysteries of theuniverse, to know more about the environ¬ment. the societies and the nature of man.The University’s seriousness of purposewas proven from the first by its insistenceupon freedom of inquiry and discussion. In¬tellectual tests for truth made other stan¬dards irrelevant. Schools for the propaga¬ is an inheritance preserved and strength¬ened, indeed made possible, by the actionand faith of many who are present today.We meet in a time of great difficulty.The society is divided. The conditions ofpublic discussion have changed. Morepeople can take part and react becausethey can be reached. Both the numbers in¬volved and the means of communicationincrease the likelihood — and certainly thepowers — of distortion. The problems arecomplex; the limits of knowledge areagonizingly apparent in matters of publicpolicy. Meanwhile the investigations of thesocial sciences have mde clearer the non-rational components of human behavior.The relevance and integrity of reason arequestioned at the same time as impatience ,emphasizes the manipulative aspects ofconcepts and institutions.The outrage of this war continues.The view of the world as it is or could beis conditioned for many by the protectivewalls or barriers of higher education. Fo-mal education at both the college andContinued on Page Nine Maroon—DAVID TRAVISTHE PRESIDENT ADDRESSES THE MULTITUDE: Edward Levi in Rockefeller Chapelduring the inaugural address Thursday.Vf \ jd re A nM’ijM c>rtr.?i i"J s '‘St/Day of Resistance\ '**• - -*w 1HPADU HoldsAs the bells of Rockefeller Chapel pealedfor Edward Levi’s inauguration, six youngmen across the street at Woodward Courtannounced their resignation from the Se¬lective Service System.The turn-in, part of the November 14 Na¬tional Day of Resistance, was sponsored bythe Hyde Park Anti-Draft Union (HPADU).After holding a silent vigil along the lineof the inaugural march from Ida Noyes toRockefeller Chapel, the crowd of morethan 400 filed over to Woodward Courtyard for the ceremony.Many of the audience signed a statementsupporting those who decided to resist,which was inscribed on a poster to be sentto the Justice Department.Jerry Lipsch. president of Student Gov¬ernment, spoke first, talking of the frame¬work within which students were forced toexercise their freedoms. Condemning suchframeworks, Lipsch said “Resistancemeans declaring that you are a whole per¬son, not just a role or a cog in their ma¬chine.”“Freedom in a framework is a sham anda lie,” Lipsch stated.The first of the actual resisters to speakwas Chris Hannafan. 72. Speaking of hisreasons for refusing to register with theSelective Service System, he said “I willnot serve that in which I no longer be¬lieve.”JERRY LIPSCH: Addressing the demonstrators on Inauguration Day.Hannafan spoke of the Resistance asbeing one of the few real hopes left for thiscountry. He closed with two lines from aDoors composition: “Tell the people thatyou see/ follow me1 follow me down.”John Welch, 70, also turning in hiscards, talked about the imprisonment in astockade in Fort Jackson, South Carolina,of Ron Fogelman, a graduate of the Col¬lege in 1967. Fogelman, Welch said, wasjailed for refusing an order to train forduty as a combatant. Welch said “Thedraft card means that I’ve agreed to killanyone the government tells me to kill.I’m no longer willing to carry the card andkeep that agreement.”“The idea of feeling you have to gothrough school to get a Bachelor’s degreeso you can get into a good grad school soyou can get a nice, comfortable job. . .thatidea disgusts me,” Welch said.“If you’re going to have a nice, comfort¬able job, the least you can do is to takeThoreau’s advice and first get your foot offyour brother’s back. . .We’re here becausewe have a privilege status from the ma¬chine which is fighting the war. If we areto get our feet off the backs of our blackbrothers who fight the war and our yellowbrothers who are killed, we must stop act¬ ing within the Selective Service System,”Welch urged.Another resister, Michael Presser, a for¬mer student now working for the ChicagoArea Draft Resisters (CADRE), noted hemade the decision to refuse induction sev¬eral months ago. “What I do today doesn’tmean too much. But if I start working nowat committing myself to (alternatives tothe present system), then it might be animportant day for me.Barbara Byhouwer, wife of Peter Byhou-wer, a member of the 57th St. Meeting ofFriends, read a letter her husband wasmailing to his local draft board in Maine.Byhouwer had sent his draft card back toSelective Service previously, had it re¬turned, and destroyed it.The letter read, in part, “We recognizethe evil of all forms of conscription. . .toremain silent while outrages are per¬formed in Vietnam in our name is immor¬al.”Clark Kissinger, an alumnus of Chicagoand a “revolutionary socialist”, said hewas turning in his card for the sixth orseventh time. Kissinger recently offered to accept induction into the Army, after beingdeclared delinquent for sending his draftcard to the Vietnamese National LiberationFront, but the Army tentatively rejectedhim pending results of medical tests. De¬scribing himself as a non-pacifist, henoted, “When the guys said to me we wantto give you military training. I said, ‘Digit.’”He commented on a recent Sun-Timeseditorial which attacked protestors as notbeing scholars. “The Bundys, the Daleys,the Brundages, the controllers of the uni¬versity and society. . .these. . .these arescholars?” he asked.Bill Avery, a student at University of Il¬linois Chicago Circle, who has refused in¬duction, said “I am turning in my cardand setting myself free by virtue of myown conscience.” Neal May, a student atGeorge Williams College, also announcedhis decision to resist.Representing Faculty Resist, six ofwhom were at the turn-in ceremony, Mel¬vin Rothenberg, associate professor ofmathematics, expressed the group’s sup¬port for the resisters. Discussing the sig¬ Maroon—HOWIE SCHAMESTnificance of the recent election, Rothen-Iberg described it as a “non-event,” and Ipredicted it would not reduce the need forresistance strategies.Another gesture of support by a faculty Imember for the resisters was given by IMarlene Dixon, assistant professor of hu-1man development. Dressed in her academ-!ic cap and gown, she marched with the Iprocession of faculty members headed forRockefeller Chapel, then broke away totake her place with the line of resisters intheir silent vigil.“This was an individual act of supportfor those men who have decided to committheir lives to resistance. I want to empha¬size that it was not intended as a gesture (of criticism for Mr. Levi.”She said she had “struggled with myconscience,” and had decided the previousnight she should “make some gesture.” JThe several hundred students at the cer¬emony joined the resisters in closing theceremony with a rousing rendition of“Amazing Grace,” a hymn which is thelocal theme song of the Resistance move ]ment.MUSICRAFTSPECIAL*3995JensenSpeakerSpecial •?*!*# 1 X-402-speaker2-wayloudspeaker system$57.00 Here’s the exciting new JensonX-40, .ultra-compact loudspeakersystem. Physical dimensions:Onecubic foot. Sound dimensions:It's way ahead of anything elsein its class. Jensen engineers havecreated this big-system soundwith an 8-inch, long travelFI.KX AIH’ woofer ami a 3-inchdirect radiator tweeter housed ina tine oiled walnut cabinet. Thiseomi>elling model has a high fre¬quency balance control. Arid is atwo-way system that covers thecomplete audio range from 30 to10,000 cycles. That's a lot of soundI >et ween anyone’s bookends.SPECIFICATIONSComponents: An 8-mch long travel, low resonance FlEXAIR® woofer with6.8 oz. DP-Alnico-5 mognet and a 3-inch direct radiator tweeter. FrequencyRang*: 30 16,000 cps Crossover Frequency: 2,000 cps. Powor Rating:25 watts. Impodanco: 8 ohms. Controls: high-frequency balance control.Dimansions: lO’/i" H.; 19»/j" W., 9" D. Shipping Woight: 24 lbs.ON CAMPUS CALL BOB TABOR 324-300548 E. Oak St.--DE 1-4150 *Afi3AilT/tnft 2035 W. 95tn St.-779-G500The Chicago MarooniVWhT uay.riJ $aT November 15, 19688691 ,if \atjmovoii JOSEPH JARMAN CO.With RoscoeFavors, LesterNov. 16 8:00 P.M.Ida NoyesContemporary Mitchell, MalachiBowie. Saturday,$1.50HallMusic SocietyjFaculty Pass Judgement On Levi*i think Mr Levi will be an excellentpresident,” says professor of anatomy Wil¬liam Doyle. “I can’t think of a better pres¬ident. I think there will be a continuationof some policies that Mr Levi has alreadybeen implementing.”The Maroon conducted a survey of fullprofessors and various trustees and admin¬istrators in the University asking them thefollowing questions: “What kind of a presi¬dent do you think Edward H Levi will be?”and “Do you foresee any changes in thepolicies or operations of the University?”Most faculty members, though agreeingthat these were particularly difficult ques¬tions to answer, felt that Levi would makean “outstanding” president, some addingthat there is “no better man for the job.”The faculty were split on the question ofmajor policy changes during Levi’s admin¬istration. Some, like master of the new col¬legiate division James Redfield, said “Aca¬demically there will be no change, becauseLevi's been running it. There may be somechanges in business or buildings andgrounds, but I don’t know enough about that 10 comment.” David Easton, professorof political science, agreed, saying thatsince Levi has been Provost, the “mainpattern of his thinking is already presentin the University.”Some, like Dr Joseph Fried of the de¬partments of biochemistry and chemistry,said he “obviously foresaw changes” andfelt that since “Mr Levi is wide-awake andhas a feeling for what is going on, thatmeans changes.”Richard Flacks, an assistant professor inthe department of sociology, felt that al¬though Levi will “take a lot of initiative,”no “significant change” is forthcoming.Flacks also sees a continuation of faculty-oriented priorities, with less attention tothe problems of undergraduates. FairfaxM Cone, chairman of the board of tustees,felt that no major changes would occursince Levi was so closely associated withBeadle.A great many faculty members feltthemselves unqualified, or not knowl¬edgeable enough with relation to Levi, toSTUDENT REACTION: Students watch with mixed expression as President Leviwalks by.Student Feeling MixedOn New PresidentStudent opinion about the University’snew president is widely ambivalent, a Ma¬roon survey seems to indicate.Students based many of their opinionsabout Levi from two sources: other stu¬dents and accomplishments of the Beadleadministration.Approximately half of the hundred oddreplies received in response to a question¬naire printed in the last two issues werefavorable to Levi describing him as a ca¬pable administrator and a reputable schol¬ar on the basis of his accomplishments asprovost. However, implicit in both the pro-and anti-Levi factions was the existence ofa “credibility gap”.As one pro-Levi student stated, “He willprobably be a strong and decisive presi¬dent although he may not be good enoughat informing the University community ofhis thoughts and actions. He won’t inspirefantastic love and confidence from stu¬dents.”One of Levi’s greatest problems will begaining the confidence of the campus. Hiswell-known statements putting researchahead of the education of students in im¬portance to the University have frightenedmany undergraduates.“His concern for the undergraduate —which has been lacking — must be im¬proved. I’m afraid it still will remain thesame, especially as Levi has been in favorof research more than for education in theCollege.”Students generally perceive him as ashrewd and cold administrator and feelhat he lacks insight and concern for stu¬dents and th Jr needs.“I believe he wishes to please the stu¬ dents,” said a student, “He does recognizethe weight of their opinion. Unfortunately,Mr. Levi seems to see students as a massof discontents, and is responsive to themmainly in a defensive vein. He needs toconsider students more as his colleagues(or his co-workers) than as a force to becarefully dealt with.”A student taking a harder line againstLevi commented, “He is willing to removelarge numbers of students who interferewith his conception of the great university.In the absence of major confrontations hiscontempt of students is limited only by histotal fear of such disruption and his unwil¬lingness to talk to students.”Most students agree that there will belittle or no difference between the Beadleadministration or the new administrationsince students seem to feel that Levi’s con¬trol was already firmly entrenched in theold administration.Students indicated overwhelming concernthat the Levi administration will showlittle concern for campus problems. Hous¬ing, urban renewal, student power, andacademic reform were outstanding issueswhich students considered should be themain focus of the new administration indealing with student problems.One complaint of the Levi administrationalready was the appointment of John Mos¬cow, fourth year student in the College, asthe student ombudsman. Many believedthat the campus should have had some de¬cision in the appointment of a student om¬budsman. Some students suggested thatLevi should make himself available to stu¬dents one or two days a week. make any judgments about his future aspresident.Commenting generally on the role of aUniversity president, Richard McKeon,professor of philosophy and classical lan¬guages and literature, said, “a president’srole is not to change policy, but to listen todiscussion and try to move it along. Ideasshould come from faculty and students. Wedon’t elect a man to run a country in thesame way we do not elect a president tobe a despot.”Even those who foresaw “some changein administration” were ward pressed tocome up with specific prophesies. Onementioned a probable increase in the re¬cruitment of better faculty, an across-the-board “strengthening of the University,”and an even greater trend in “putting theUniversity even tighter into the estab¬lishment” than under Beadle’s adminis¬tration.General agreement arose, however, thatLevi’s administration would be more flex¬ible with regard to change than that of hispedecessor. One trustee of the University,Philip D. Block, Jr. commented, “He will probably continue to maintain the samepolicy, although I think he’ll remain flex¬ible.Levi’s general awareness of the activityand feeling around him was also empha¬sized by some respondees. Dr Joseph B.Kirsner, professor of medicine, said, “Themost important consideration is that heseems to have a feel for the times. Heseems to be aware of what needs to bedone.”“Mr. Levi certainly will not be inflex¬ible,” commented Robert McCleary, pro¬fessor of psychology. “When new needsarise he will react to them. Don’t expectlarge-scale immediate change because hewas so instrumental in shaping currentpolicy.”That Levi was “instrumental” in deter¬mining the operations and policy of theUniversity through George Beadle’s admin¬istration is unquestioned among those fac¬ulty we surveyed. But whether these pol¬icies will continue through his own reign orwhether we can expect some new directionand new tact to emerge is very much opento question.Students Voice OpinionAt Levi ReceptionsA wide variety of student opinions cameout of the receptions honoring PresidentEdward H Levi Wednesday.Topics of discussion at the reception inthe Bergman Gallery, attended by studentsin the College, ranged from student powerand research to problems of the neighbor¬hood.Issues raised by the graduate students,at their reception in Reynolds Club, con¬sisted of the inaugural dinner at the Hilton,the importance of students in the univer¬sity, and the University’s stand on theevents which took place at the Democraticconvention.According to Susan Grosser, ’69, coor¬dinator of the receptions, the purpose ofthe reception was to enable “anyone whowants to, to walk in and meet Levi, talk tohim, and find out what he thinks.” Shestated that the reception also gave stu¬dents a chance to participate in inauguralevents. Student reactions to both the purpose ofthe receptions and the receptions them¬selves were varied. “This is the way I feelthe University should always be” one stu¬dent said. “This university needs more re¬ceptions and sherry hours where we canmeet administrators and faculty.”Seveal students explained their purposein coming to the reception. “I was basical¬ly curious. . .1 have very little time for uni¬versity affairs. . .it was one of the events Ihad the opportunity to take part in.” An¬other student stated: “I wanted to seewhat Levi was like. . .so I stood and staredat him.”Not all reactions were positive, however.One student commented that he thought “itwas wonderful that the little folk finallygot their chance.”Student comments also covered Levihimself. “I think Edward Levi is a cordial,nice little man,” commented one student.Another said: “I think he looks anpplic ”BERGMAN GALLERY: The two-legged "Solid apd Transparent" by Joseph Albe>s.November 15, 1968 The Chicago Maroon 7EDITORIALA Time for Change“Levi Installed as UC Chief,” the B&G workman read over theshoulder of a student reading yesterday afternoon’s newspaper inthe bookstore. “What kind of a guy’s that Levi?”“He’ll be very good in some ways,” we replied, “and not sogood in others.”“How’s that?”“Well, some of the students don’t think he cares enough aboutthem.”“Oh, boy, that’s not so good. Levi’s gonna have a rough time,isn’t he?”“I guess so.”“But why’s that? Don’t the students help pick the President?”“No.”“Oh, that’s no good at all. After all, the President is supposedto be close to the students, isn’t he?”The vignette illustrates the difficult situation Edward HirschLevi faces as the University of Chicago’s new President.As Provost, Levi did not earn the best reputation as an admin¬istrator sympathetic to student demands for a greater role inmaking decisions affecting students. This is unfortunate, becausein his own way he cares a great deal about them. Countless luncheshe has had with students and his appointment of a student ombuds¬man (badly handled though we thought it was) are just two ex¬amples of this.It appeared to many students a slap in the face when last sum¬mer a committee was appointed to select the new president thatincluded no students: half were trustees, half were faculty, andthe faculty were the advisory half. And this is unfortunate becausea presidential search committee properly representative of studentsprobably would have arrived at the very same decision. As thisnewspaper put it last September, “We sincerely congratulate Levion his election to the presidency, but are sorry we did not havethe chance to help make the choice ourselves.”Finally, events over the past year and leading up to the inaug¬uration had not assuaged many student doubts about the President-designate. There were no discernable moves made during thisperiod of transition to assure students that the new administrationwould genuinely be willing to concede to students some of thepowers they have for so long a time been seeking. Indeed, only atthe last minute was the decision made to invite students to theWednesday night dinner, and students clearly played second fiddleto nearly everyone else at the other inauguration events. Andthis too is unfortunate because most disaffected students are notseeking revolution but some restructuring of the University to givethem a greater degree of involvement in policy decisions.But it happened that a student suspended at the 1967 admini¬stration building study-in became so alienated as to call for violencelast year, and that two dozen protesters felt compelled to disruptthe Wednesday night dinner. There would be little sympathy forthese people if the alternative were more palatable. And even thisis unfortunate, for it can be.Edward Hirsch Levi will without doubt bring new heights ofexcellence to Chicago, for he is a brilliant scholar and a dynamicadministrator, and for these reasons we celebrate his inauguration.Making the concessions of power that students deserve is anothermatter, however, but we are hopeful that Levi will show thecapacity and the desire to persuade trustees, administrators, andfaculty that these concessions will have to be made before dissen¬sion in this community of scholars is lessened and the transmissionand discovery of new knowledge can proceed as it should.Both the need and the opportunity for change are strongernow than ever; we urge the new' administration to take that oppor¬tunity. 'So What Else Is New'Flacks Letter DefendedAgainst Booth RebuttalBy Bernard AronsonThey say down in Hynes CountyNo neutrals have we metYou’re either for the freedom ridesOr you’ll Tom for Ross Barnett.Which side are you on boys?(Old freedom song)If Mr Flacks’ letter to the Maroon re¬quired any further legitimation, it was am¬ply provided by the quality of those lettersthat appeared in the next issue, opposinghim. I wish to reply to Mr Booth’s longrebuttal specifically, because his system¬atic evasion of the issues is symptomaticof the posture this university and its apo¬logists adopt to deny the existence andcharacter of its political affiliations. Thepart of Mr Booth’s letter consists of aseries of “facts” which he thinks relevantto Mr Flacks’ indictment of the Levi din¬ner. “Principles” are dealt with later.Mr Booth thinks that it is extremely im¬portant that Fact no. 1: Mr Levi himselfdid not plan the dinner or choose theguests; rather a faculty board handled thistask.Fact no 2: The dinner was to be only oneof many events of the inauguration; mostof the others were to take place onTHE CHICAGO MAROONEditor: Roger BlackBusiness Manager: Jerry LevyManaging Editor: John RechtNews Editor: Barbara HurstPhotographic Editor: David TravisNews Board: Wendy Glockner, Caroline Heck,Paula SzewezykSenior Editor: Jeffrey KutaAssistant to the Editor: Howie SchamestContributing Editor: John MoscowNews Staff: Walter Cipin, Caroline Daffron,Debby Dobish, Ann Goodman, Bruce Gres-sin, Con Hitchcock, C. D. Jaco, StephanieLowe, Chris Lyon, Bruce Norton, DavidSteele, Leslie Strauss, Robert Swift.Production Staff: Mitch Bobkin, Sue Loth,David Steele, Leslie Strauss, Robert Swift.Sunshine Girl: Jean WiklerFounded in 1892. Published by University ofChicago students on Tuesdays and Fridaysthroughout the regular school year and inter¬mittently throughout the summer, except duringthe tenth week of the academic quarter andduring examination periods. Of tices in Rooms303, 304, and 305 of Ida Noyes Hall, 1212 E.59th St., Chicago, III. 60637. Phone Midway 3-0800, Ext. 3269. Distributed on campus andin the Hyde Park neighborhood free of charge.Subscriptions by mail $7 per year. Non-profitpostage paid at Chicago, III. Subscribers toCollege Press Service. ANALYSIScampus. (What do these “facts” have to dowith McGeorge Bundy and Vietnam?)Fact no 3: A committee cannot be pro¬phetic; invitations were sent out lastspring. (The Vietnamese war began some¬what earlier). “Should they have to refusean invitation to someone (who isn’t cominganyway),” Mr Booth asks incredulously,“on the grounds that four months later hewas going to offend us.” (He is referringto Mayor Daley).So , once a bureaucratic decision ismade, it is, of course, irrevocable? Mr.Booth says that he finds Mayor Daley’sactions in August “grave” and “appall¬ing.” Yet he does not seem to think thatthe University should have rescinded theinvitation of a man who brutalized hun¬dreds of people seeking to express that le¬gitimate dissent to which Wayne Boothpays lip service each orientation week.Would Mr Booth have us believe that Da¬ley’s invitation was not rescinded solelybecause he had been invited prior to hispolitical crimes?And then Booth adds that Daley wasn’tcoming anyway, as if that meant anythingmore than that the mayor was busy or,mure likely, that he understood much bet¬ter than Mr Booth exactly what an outragehis presence would evoke, and wished toavoid political embarassment.Fact no 4 consists of two parts. The firststates that “the dinner is no means con¬fined to wealthy givers, much less to wick¬ed ones.” This “fact” is an insult to any¬one’s moral concerns. Do we now make ahead count and if only a handful of ex¬ploiters are honored by U.C. are con¬sciences are salved?The second part of Fact no 4 is as emptyan evasion as the first part. Booth saysthat at a dinner such as this, “an assort¬ment of civic leaders” is always present.Well, then do we have a dinner such asthis? Do we want these supporters? Boothspeaks to none of Mr Flacks’ charges. Hisresponse is purely formal, contentlessContinued on Page 108 The Chicago Maroon November 15, 1968Continued from Page Fivegraduate level is highly regarded as thegateway to success. More than forty-fiveper cent of our young people in the appli¬cable age group are in college — an ex¬traordinary change and, with some quali¬fications, an extraordinary achievement.But the joyous knowledge that the bank ofknowledge is overstuffed, and can bedrawn upon only with the assistance of thelatest generation of computers, adds to theimpression of a technical industrializedsociety in which individual thought andconcern are powerless — in which basicdecisions appear to have been made in oth¬er times or by other people in other places.The very idea that centers of education arefor thoughtful, and therefore personal, con¬sideration of values, and for increased un¬derstanding, is lost by those who insist thatuniversities are mechanisms of sevice tobe used in a variety of ways for the inter- «ests of the larger community.There are many institutions for service-in our society. Centers of learning and in¬struction have considerable difficulty inperfoming their cental tasks; one mayquestion the wisdom of assigning to themadditional duies. In any event, among col¬leges, schools and universities there areimportant differences. Ou history, capac¬ity and objectives ae not all the same.Each institution must find its own mission^The mission of The University of Chicagois primarily the intellectual search fortruth and the transmission of intellectual \values. The emphasis must be on theachievement of that understanding whichcan be called discovery. President Beadlehas spoken, as is his special right to do, of“the incomparable thrill of original dis¬covery.” He has referred to the import¬ance of having students participate in theprocess through which knowledge is re¬affirmed and add'tions to knowledge aremade. This, of course, is the process ofeducation — whatever the means used,and it applies to the dialogue as well asto the experiment. We should reaffirm ttHT*s’close connection between the creativity ofteaching and the creativity of research. _And we should reaffirm also our conTtml-ment to the way of reason, without a Uni¬versity becomes a menace and a carica¬ture. / <It is of course easy to be in favor ofreason. But the commitment is somewhatmore demanding and difficult. PresidentHarper in his decennial report took occa¬sion to emphasize ‘‘that the principle ofcomplete freedom of speech on all subjectshas from the beginning been regarded asfundamental to The University of Chicago.”At the same time he repeated the policythat “The University, as such does notappear as a disputant on either side uponany public question and . . . utteranceswhich any professor may make in publicare to be regarded as representing hisopinion only.” Academic freedom isstronger now than it was then. But thepropriety of the corporate neutralityof the University on public policy issueshaving moral aspects has been seriouslychallenged. The position questions the pow¬er or persuasiveness of ideas in them¬selves, recognizes the superior authority ofofficial certification, or places reliance onother forms of power. Perhaps the positionreflects the kind of frustration described byLouis Wirth in 1936. Professor Wirthwrote: “At a time in human history likeour own, when all over the world peopleare not merely ill at ease but are question¬ing the bases of social existence, the val¬idity of their truths, and the tenability oftheir norms, it should become clear hatthere is no value apart from interest andno objectivity apart from agreement.Under such circumstances it is difficult tohold tenaciously to what one believes to bethe truth in the face of dissent, and one isinclined to question the very possibility ofan intellectual life. Despite the fact thatthe Western world has been nourishedby a radition of hard-wort intellectual free¬dom and integrity for over two thousandyears, men are beginning to ask whetherthe struggle to achieve these was worththe cost if so many today accept complac¬ently the threat to exterminate what ration¬ality and objectivity have been won in human affairs. The widespread deprecia¬tion of the value of thought, on the onehand, and its repression, on the other, areominous signs of the deepening twilight ofmodem culture.”The issue raised is central to what auniversity should be and what it shouldstand for. It is of course quite true thatthe ideas of individual scholars in universi¬ties are not likely to immediately sway theworld, although some have had consider¬able effect. The tasks which universityfaculty have undertaken, sometimes with¬in, sometimes without the universitiesshould not obscure the fact that universitiesexist for the long run. They are thecustodians not only of the many culturesof man, but of the rational process itself.Universities are not neutral. They do existfor the propagation of a special point ofview; namely, the worthwhileness of theintellectual pursuit of truth — using man’shighest powers, struggling agianst the ir-relevancies which corrupt thought, andnow standing against the impatience ofthose who have lost faith in reason. Thisview does not remove universities fromthe problems of society. It does not dimin¬ish, indeed it increases, the pressure forthe creation and exchange of ideas, popularor unpopular, which remake the world.It does suggest that the greatest contribu¬tion of universities will be in that liberationof the mind which makes possible whatKenneth Clark has called, the strategy oftruth.“For,” as he says, “the search fortruth, while impotent without implementa¬tion in action, undergirds every otherstrategy in behalf of constructive socialchange.” One would hope that this libera¬tion of the mind would result from a liberaleducation at Chicago at both the under¬graduate and graduate level.One can well understand the impatienceof those who prefer a different relevanceof practical action. In some areas,implementation, leading to a morebasic examination of consequences andmeaning, has been made an appro¬priate part of training and research.But this may be insufficient to satisfythose who for the time being at least,and for laudade and understandable rea¬sons, would prefer a different way of life.Nevertheless they stay within the educa¬tional system caught by its pretense andrigidity. They feel they must stay a longtime. Not only has the number of yearsrequired for formal education steadily in¬creased as college and graduate work aretreated as necessities, but the model press¬es for the total absorption of the students’interest either in the curriculum or in an¬ cillary activities. We are set on a coursewhich suggests that every young person upto the age of twenty-five, every young fam¬ily really, should have an educational in¬stitution as a surrogate for the world,uite apart from the fact that institutionsof higher learning should not be surrogatesfor the world, the satisfaction with whichthis development is greeted should be tem¬pered. This development in part is a re¬sponse to distortions caused by the Selec¬tive Service System. Much of the educationat the graduate level — in some areas, notall — is unnecessary, or even worse is dis¬qualifying for professional work, as for ex¬ample the undergraduate teaching forwhich it is required. I do not expect agree¬ment on that and I am probably wrong.For some areas I doubt whether the ex¬tended time can be justified as a reflectionof the increase in knowledge. Rather, itappears as an unimaginative response onthe part of the educational system to theexistence of increased leisure time withinthe economy. And if the goal of a collegeeducation for everyone is to be met in away to do the most good, the purposes andways of that education, even the period oftime involved, should be reexamined. I re¬alize this has been done before, but per¬haps it will not hurt too much to take an¬other look. What I am trying to suggest isthat for those who are interested in pio¬neering, there is much to think about. TheUniversity is a member of many commu¬nities. We cherish the relationship withother universities. We are a member oftheir world community. We are also an ur¬ban university on the South Side of Chi¬cago. In many ways through many activi¬ties various members of the Universityfaculties and students are working withinthe community. We_seek to be a goodneighbor. Most of us are in fact neighbors.The community has much to offer us. Thefact that most of our faculty live here hashelped to maintain the oneness and inter¬disciplinary character of this institution. Ithas made it possible to measure the effectof new enterprises and responsibilitiesupon the institution as a whole. This guide¬line enforces self restraint. It is, I think, ofbenefit both to the community and to theUniversity. New models for pediatric care,for counselling and psychiatric assistance,and new approaches to the major problemsof urban education should emerge from theendeavors which have been planned anddeveloped with representatives of the com¬munity. These are not the only scholarly-service-training activities in which mem¬bers of the faculty are engaged within the community which have significance far be¬yond the problems of one neighborhoodand which over time may well determinethe quality of life in world urban centers.The work in the complex problems of com¬munities within the city is an encouragingcontinuation of historic research begun fif¬ty years ago by the Chicago school of soci¬ology.In 1902 President Harper referred to thefirmly established policy of the trustees“that to the faculties belong to the fullestextent the care of educational adminis¬tration.” “The responsibility,’ ’ he said,“for the settlement of educational ques¬tions rests with the faculty.” On this policythe initial greatness of the University wasbuilt. The trustees, whether they agreed ornot with particular decisions, have beenthe strongest advocates of this policy. Andthe faculty have fulfilled this responsi¬bility, protecting on the one hand the free¬dom of the individual scholar, and shep¬herding at the same time, although notwithout some pain, some of the most inter¬esting programs for both undergraduateand graduate instruction attempted in thiscountry. I stress the position of the facultybecause obviously the quality of this Uni¬versity rests upon them and is created bythem. And the burdens upon them have in¬creased because the conditions of educationhave changed. Sir. Eric As^by in a notableaddress at the University ot Witwatersrandquoted from an essay on “The open Uni¬versities of South Africa” as follows:“There is no substitute for the clash ofmind between colleague and colleague, be¬tween teacher and student, between stu¬dent and student.. .It is here the half-formed idea may take shape, the ground¬less belief be shattered, the developing the¬ory be tested. . .It is here the controversydevelops, and out of controversy, deeperunderstanding.” Today when there is doubtand skepticism concerning the very tradi¬tion of intellectual freedom and integrityupon which the intellectual pursuit ofknowledge is based, it is important thatthe university through its faculty meetthese questions head on.This University has indeed been fortu¬nate in the dedication which throughout theyears it has evoked. It has bee surroundedby a circle of friends, who by their aspira¬tions for the university and their own selfsacrifice have assured its pursuit of quali¬ty and its inner integrity.I am proud to be in this place and I shalldo my best.Letter ControversyIn view of Tuesday’s letters of responseto Flacks’ November 8 letter to the Ma¬roon, it is apparent that he has rearouseda politically-sleepy faculty. It will be a pityfor this University if the response is onlymomentary. The statement by Ashenhurstand others, in defending trustees as godfa¬thers of academic freedom, reminded meof the liberal bravado of Hubert Humphrey— mostly true but largely irrelevant. EvenMcGeorge Bundy has recognized (in theSeptember Atlantic) that the presenttrustee-system of university governmentneeds revision, that persons within the Uni¬versity less tied to status quo valuesshould help make its corporate decisions.Booth’s letter evinces this faculty’s aca¬demic freedom hang-up. At other placesequally renowned, faculty concern over thewar has produced collective manifestationsof that forgotten value of political responsi¬bility, even to the point of risking its sa¬cred academic freedom (and financial sup¬port) because of community disapproval ofits actions. University corporate politicaldissent is an established fact at otherschools, if not here.In a recently completed survey, (my dis¬sertation research) of 106 schools that had fall 1967 demonstrations by students andfaculty against war-related recruiting oncampus (by Dow, the military, and theCIA), 44 schools reported subsequent revi¬sions in recruiting policy which in variousways restricted these recruiters’ visitingrights. Half the time this policy cameabout directly in response to a resolutionpassed by the school’s faculty deliberativebody. Chicago, of course, was not one ofthese schools, although last year’s effortsto sever formal university ties with the In¬stitute for Defense Analysis also suggests aless than total political neutrality Most ofthese faculty resolutions were framed notas direct political acts of noncooperation,but more politely as means to protect stu¬dents from the Hershey directives on draft¬ing disobedient demonstrators. Even thefaculty of Stanford University were suf¬ficiently aroused to risk government dis¬pleasure and voted to ban military recuit-ers, alhough they were overuled by theirpresident, and later in a referendum bytheir conservative student body.The full political impact of these restric¬tions on recruiters will never be known,but there is evidence that our governmentgot the message. Last June 10 the Senateamended to its NASA authorization bill aprovision to deny NASA funds to in¬stitutions that bar Armed Forces recruit¬ers from their campuses (Science, JuneNovember 15, 1968 21). In sponsoring the amendment, SenatorCarl Curtis (R — Neb.) stated “institutionshave an obligation, patriotic in nature, andin the interests of our country to cooperatewith the program of the U.S. Govern¬ment.”No one questions the value of academicfreedom, as long as it is coupled with polit¬ical responsibility. The exercise and sup¬port of an academic freedom which has nopolitical impact except to support the stat¬us quo is an empty, self-servicing freedomat best.Dinner FarceThe unimpassioned pedantry of MrBooth’s letter cannot be met with simpleindifference even if apathy is more or lessour immediare response. Mr Booth hasclearly donned his intellectual robe andpiped his pipe and the result is a letter oran argument with the structure of a briefand the substance of a footnote.Let us copy his structure. I say copy hisstructure for I believe Mr Booth appre¬ciates structure and regards form as apindication of good intentions and fair play.So, Mr Booth join me in the sport of fairplay while I do my utmost to express mycontempt for your brand of intellectual de¬tergent.Continued on Page TenThe .Chicago,MaroonCritics of Booth Letter State ViewsContinued from Page Eightcant. Add a little substance and we seeDavid Rockefeller’s investments keepingSouth African apartheid alive. Our univer¬sity doesn’t cater to supporters in general.Black people, not blacks in general, areenslaved by that fascist regime.Now we get to “principles.”Principle no 1 is vague, but seems toimply that, if it is wrong for the Universityto accept evil men’s money, then it isequally wrong for Mr Flacks’ to accept hissalary. Since he does, Booth argues,Mr. Flacks’ cannot then criticize thesources of his own income. Mr. Boothis evading the issue: he thinks theissue is simply the money. He doesn’t seethe power and desires behind the money,and what is more important, what the Uni¬versity gives in return. You don’t getsomething for nothing: Morris Janowitzteaches counter-insurgency techniques tobe used in black ghettoes; U. C. producesa bumper crop of professionals to man ourcorporate institutions and bureaucracies;every big business, including Dow Chem¬ical, recruits here on campus; and wewine and dine McGeorge Bundy at “civic”functions. This “principle” of Mr. Booth does notrespond to Mr Flacks’ indictment of theparticipants of this dinner, but tries im¬pugn Flacks’ character by implying thathe too might be a sinner. Well, we’re allgoing to have a lot of explaining to do toour grandchildren, but only in Mr Booth’smind is there a principle that makes apolo-participants of this dinner, but tries to im-gy and complicity with oppressors equiv¬alent to some measure of opposition tothem. Whether or not Mr. Flacks is con¬flicted about his salary is of little concernhere. Mr. Flacks has not sold all his in¬tegrity and political responsibility by ac¬cepting his paycheck.The second part of Principle no. 1 is animplied defense of the donors’ democraticspirit: “Those who give the money haveone thing in common: they assume thatmuch of it will go to people who disagreewith them in politics, economic theory, re¬ligious and theory of the novel—to name afew.” That’s right. The Rockefellers’ glob¬al empire will not crumble because of thetalk of U.C. Try acting against the Rock¬efeller’s interest, and see how much moneyis forthcoming to the University. Try publi¬cly supporting the black athletes expelled from the Olympics by Avery Brundage,and see whether his check comes through.Principle no. 2: Mr Booth laments theway things are. All major universities thatprovide opportunity for free pursuit ofBooth’s education objectives depend forsupport on fat cats, gangsters, and warcriminals. Other better universities, Boothsadly tells us, exist only in the imagina¬tion. That’s not a metaphysical principle,Mr Booth, your rhetoric notwithstanding. Itis not the nature of the university, but ourchoice of what kind of university we sup¬port that makes it corrupt.It is because we don’t do ananything tooppose a university such as ours that ev¬ery major educational institution in thecountry fosters values and interest that wesay are not our own. We choose to followMr. Levi’s costly dream of a great re¬search university and everything that itentails—political self-emasculation, urbanrenewal of poor blacks out of their commu¬nity, and McGeorge Bundy for dinner atthe Hilton.Principle 3: Mr Booth contends that theUniversity as a place where free dissentmay flourish will threaten its own free ex¬istence if it excludes “associates, partici-a feeling that you are neutral. If such isreally the case I hope you enjoyed the din¬ner.Marvin FrankelRepressive ToleranceNone of the replies to Richard Flacks’letter really addressed themselves to theprinciples of his letter or looked at the as¬sumptions upon which it was based. Thereal problem which he spoke of, but whichthe responses ignored, was that of repres¬sive tolerance. Repressive tolerance is thecondition that exists in America today. Itis the condition whereby those who havepower to erate the expression of all diver¬gent views. They maybe complete oppo¬sites, but they are all adopted, co-optedand trivialized by their “free expression”Therefore Mr Nixon becomes a black pow¬er advocate par excellence (“give them apiece of the action”) and comes across asthe bearer of the olive branch of peace. Wehave law and order (with justice!) Mean¬ing and values can not longer be attachedto words because they are flung around soindiscriminately.. Distinctions are col¬lapsed, so that peace is something wewage. We had to destroy them to savethem, he said, looking at the devastatedvillage. In this one dimensional world wenot only no longer know what words meanand represent, but all values becometrivialized, benign and worthless. In thisworld Richard Flacks can be tolerated justso long as he does not step out of line. Hisreal crime is that he asked no longer to bejust “tolerated”, He asks that people acton all the values they espouse. He asksthat people take him seriously and not pathim on the back for his “splendid needl¬ing”.Ultimately one must choose and reassertthe meaning of words and values. We haveto have a hierarchy of values. It is theproblem of asserting that there comes atime or a period in history when one mustsay no to the expression of certain ideas,that there are certain ideas which are ob¬jectively regressive, destructive and anti¬human. This may be a dangerous logicaldistinction to make—one may fall into thetrap of denying freedom of expression toothers only to find that this is then turnedagainst oneself, but it nevertheless has tobe faced. If we had to live the thirties overagain how long would we have allowed Hit¬ler to go on mouthing his absurdities. Tomany people in the world (and I hope I’mnot being too precumptuous for Mr. Schwab)McGeorge Bunday is an immoral monster.True, he might be a brilliant scholar, butunfortunately the uses to which he has puthis intellect are a trifle painful to the Viet-Continued on Page 13 pants, benefactors,” let along “dining com¬panions,” for political reasons. This notionof institutional neutrality as the guarantorof academic freedom has long been usedas a smokescreen to hide complicity. TheHilton fete was not a dinner amongfriends; it was a public corporate act. Itwas his University defining its role as apart of the larger society. MrBooth musthave a very cloistered idea of how powerworks in this country if he thinks that thisinstitution is a political because it refusedto exclude McGeorge Bundy from its din¬ner.The argument is always the same eva¬sion. Those who wish to exclude someoneare political, but not those who choosesomeone that isn’t political, but neutralDoes Mr Booth remember that even theCommittee on Admissions chooses studentswithin the value consensus of this society?If one affirms those values, then one can¬not evade responsibility for their con¬sequences. One of them is Vietnam.Do we have such compartmentalizedminds that we separate Mr Bundy “emi¬nent educator” from Mr Bundy “architectand proponent of the War.” And was hetold beforehand that his address was to bepolitically neutral, whatever that mightmean? This evasion is intolerable. Univer¬sity spokesmen have been sitting on thefence of institutional neutrality for toolong. They think readicals are trying tochop down the fence. In truth it never exis¬ted.When this University invited McGeorgeBundy to a place of honor at this publicfunction, then it embraced him as an hon¬orable man. And he and men like him re¬main in control because pretigious in¬stitutions lend their support instead of call¬ing for his trial as a war criminal. WhenU.C. refuses to rescind Mayor Daley’s in¬vitation, then it likewise substantiates hispublic power and what he does with it.This naivete about political power is nei¬ther ungenuous nor harmless. It is a lie.Mr Booth rests his claim on his concernfor maintaining freedom within the univer¬sity, while he accuses Mr Flacks of notsharing that concern but rather operatingon the basis of “personal political con¬viction.” What freedom in the university isMr. Booth defending? That freedom whichforces a large bluk of its male population toattend because the alternative is to commitgenocide in Vietnam? That freedom eitherto work or not to work for Dow Chemicalwhen it comes to recruit on campus? Thatfreedom to displace poor blacks by livingwhere they used to live because the Uni¬versity has torn down hundreds of theirhomes in the last fifteen years? That free¬dom to have a president handed down tous, to have no role in the choice of ourteachers, but to see our friends on the fac¬ulty refused tenure? That freedom whichthis University so nobly scampers after—tospeak one’s mind but to be so co-opted thatone isn’t able to refrain from supporting“one of the worst political acts of this dec¬ade.” (Mr Booth’s reference to Mayor Da¬ley).Freedom within the university will re¬main a shame as long as this institutionsupports South Africa and Vietnam and themen who created the sham of freedom wewitnessed on Nov. 5th. - .The conviviality that was intended toprevail at this “civic” dinner is represen¬tative of more than the good fellowship ofthe participants. The crowd at the Hiltonmixes so easily because, unfortunately,their fellowship flourish on a happy baT-gain of mutual backscratching and politi¬cal expediency. Only, there is a third partyto the bargain — albeit unwilling — thepeople of the world who are stunted anddying so that these men may prosper andreap honor.At the University of Chicago we aretaught that problems are “complex,” andthat’s true. But the University has tried tomilk the rhetoric of complexity to evaderesponsibility for its actions. Don’t fociyourselves. The powers by whose graceyou survive and the people you oppressaren’t fooled.(Aronson, ’68 is a graduate student ingeneral studies in the humanities.)Continued from Page NineFact No 1. You remind us that Mr Leviis not holding the affair as Mr Flacks sug¬gests. I agree with you. I think Mr Flacksagrees with you. On the surface (and whenit is to your advantage Mr Booth, I havethe peculiar feeling, surfaces are terriblyrelevant), Mr. Levi is after all the guest.Still. Mr Levi as guest could have regis¬tered a public protest. More important the“spirit” of Mr. Levi was that responsiblemembers of the University should not haveplanned the banquet or should havechanged their plans or should have ex¬pressed a public statement explaining theiractions. This was clearly the spirit of theletter written by Mr. Flacks. Why then didyou try to refute Mr. Flacks by referringjust to Mr. Levi?.tv Fact 2. You say an uninformed readerwould have assumed the civic dinner is themain or only event of the inauguration. MrBooth, I know there were many events tosymbolize the dramatic Horation Algerclimb of Mr Levi to the reins of publicresponsibility, and yet I was rather dis¬pleased by the prospect of the dinner. Cer¬tainly the magnitude of the vice hardlycommends it as a virtue.Fact 3. You say, Mr Booth, that the in¬vitations were sent before the events offour months ago. Four months ago wasthree years after Mr Bundy manifested hisrhetorical abilities against a respectedmember of this University. Four monthsago was more than eight years of ex¬periencing Mr Daley’s leadeship, and ayear after he issued orders to shoot to killpeople who stole television sets.You knew this Mr Booth, didn’t you?Were you really shocked by Mr Daley’sactions?Fact 4. By your own admission MrBooth, fact number four is as irrelevantand ambiguous as Mr Flacks’ label “fatcats”. The fact that you deemed to answerMr Flacks on such an irrelevancy in¬dicates to me at least that you know whathe means. Personally, I don’t know the ref¬erence “fat cat’”Principle 1. Mr Flacks was not arguingfor Moral Absolutism. The faculty com¬mittee could have with drawn the in¬vitation to the mayor and sent one insteadto Eugene McCarthy. The University couldhave been influenced by one such as your¬self, Mr Booth, to send an invitation toSenator Fulbright rather than Mr Bundy.Mr Flacks was simply saying that weshould not support that aspect of the Uni¬versity which falls short of what, after all,are not platonic ideals. I don’t think thateven McCarthy’s and Fulbright’s moststaunch supporters would argue that theyqualify for the moral absolutism of sain¬ thood. The fact that you can equate gettingpaid by the University with publicly ap¬plauding the stature of such men as Daleyand Bundy reveals at best an appallingoversight and at worst a moral absolutism.Principle 2. You agree with Mr Flacks inthat you both regard it as wrong that aunivesity depends for its survival “on thebeneficence of fat cats and gangsters andwar criminals.” The difference would ap¬pear to be that you regard this state ofaffairs as the best of all possible worlds. Iam reminded of the judge in Nazi Germa¬ny lamenting the Heil Hitler before eachtrial, argue how despite grave injustice wewere after all pursuing justice. More to thepoint I think Mr Flacks was saying thatimprovement is needed and it won’t comeunless Mr Booth you register your dis¬satisfaction, if you have any, to the char¬acter of the civic dinner.Principle 3. Mr. Flacks did not say thatthe University should choose associatesand participants along political lines asyou suggest Mr. Booth. He said insteadthat the University should acknowledgeand make explicit the political meaning ofits acts.Now Mr Booth, you must have knownthat Mr. Flacks was attacking those re¬sponsible for the civic dinner and notmerely Mr Levi. You must have knownthat the relevance of the civic dinner inthe total scheme of things is quite besidethe point.Certainly you knew also that the eventsof four months ago were hardly unpredic¬table in the light of Mayor Daley’s admin¬istration. After all, the Yippies were “pro¬phetic” on this point. Futhermore youmust have been aware of Mr Bundy’s polit¬ical contributions prior to four months ago.Would have been so difficult to have in¬itially sent the invitations originally to oth¬er important figures. If you are of theopinion that all this is quite besides thepoint and that the University should re¬main truly neutral then certainly an in¬vitation to someone like Stravinsky wouldhave been quite appropriate. You did notspeak of these things but instead attackedthe envelope of Mr. Flack’s letter. I thinkMr. Booth you confuse passion with ex¬tremism and conviction with rhetoric. Theprinciple you extract from the letter of MrFlacks are your own logical extensions butnot necessarily his and certainly not myown.On the assumption that you were in fullpossession of these possibilities why didyou leave them unsaid? I really can’t an¬swer that one for you. Nevertheless I dowant to say that from the content of yourletter I remain totally ignorant as to thenature of your own views. Mr Booth I haveThe Chicago Maroon l»? rNovemboc 15;.l 968Dinner Marked by Student ProtestContinued from Page Onefrom the floor. The dining hall containedover two hundred tables, and many ofthose present could not hear the protestors’comments. The student walked out aftershe finished speaking. Kimpton was inter¬rupted once more, by a student who de¬manded that Kimpton “Get off of there.”In his speech Kimpton spoke of “this busi¬ness re these students,” and stated that ifuniversities and students cannot get along,“Columbia is the grim alternative.”Kimpton was followed by Stigler, whospoke as a representative of the alumniand faculty. His speech was interrupted bya student who addressed him from thefloor. The student’s interruption was metby boos from the audience, the first in¬stance of protest against the hecklers thatincreased as the speeches went on.When Bundy was introduced, there wassome booing from the audience, mostly bystudents. He was interrupted by JohnWelch, 70, a member of Hyde Park AreaDraft Resisters Union (HPADU), whostood up and shouted. “McGeorge Bundy!You develop atrocity that is the policy inVietnam. I’ve been called to fight in thatatrocity. Here’s my draft card and here’smy answer.” He then ripped up what heclaimed was his draft card and walkedout.Bundy was interrupted by approximatelya dozen students throughout his speech.For the most part he paid no attentionto them, although at one point he said to aheckler ,“Go on. You’re silly.”The audience became increasingly dis¬approving of the hecklers as the speechwent on. Eventually, as soon as a studentstood up, the audience started clappingand cheering to drown the student out untilhe left.There were also some physical clashes.When Earl Turner,’69, stood up he wasgrabbed by a guest who tried to push himdown and raised his hand to strike him.The guest was stopped by Charles Daly,vice-president for development and publicaffairs and chairman of the inaugurationcommittee. Daly told the guest, who wasan alumnus, but not a facility member, tosit down or else Daly would try to have thealumnus arrested. Administrators had expected some stu¬dent protest from the floor and had beeninformed of this prior to the dinner.Other students who interrupted Bundywere shoved by some guests. Sally Yogol,70, stated that as she was trying to speaka man poured a glass of water on her, andthat she was kicked by some guests on herway out.Bundy continued to ignore the studentsand went on to speak of “that rich andserene institution we have envisioned,” and “the life of the mind — that’s what auniversity is, or it is nothing.”After Bundy’s speech, several persons,including about a dozen who were not stu¬dents left the room. Cone could not imme¬diately restore order, and had to rap hisgavel several times before he could in¬troduce Levi.Levi spoke briefly ,and mentioned thestudent demonstrators only once, as hesaid, “Up to recently, the University’sbeen deficient in some areas, among them theater, but there seem to be some moves— such as tonight — to remedy that.”After Levi spoke, Cone immediately ad¬journed the dinner.After the dinner, some students contin¬ued their protest, talking to individualguests and passersby in the hotel and onthe street.Student protestors interviewed after thedinner told of other incidents, includingone in which a prominent University figureallegedly spat in the face of David Klafter.’69.Maroon—DAVID TRAVISDINNER CROWD: Two thousand people jam Conrad Hilton to attend Inauguration Dinner.Maroon—DAVID TRAVISEDWARD LEVI: The new President stops during dinner speech. Maroon—DAVID TRAVISSTUDENT PROTESTOR: Student rises during dinner to voice his views.•N0*eftttotfr< >5/’1968 The Chicago Maroon *v 11Inauguration:Inside and OutThe Chicago Maroon November 15, 1968LETTERS TO THE EDITORContinued from Page Tennamese. Not unlike many Germans in thethirties he is considered in the eyes ofmuch of the world as a war criminal.Should we then continue to recognize himas a member of that marketplace ofideas-The University?Richard Lewontin is right when he saysthat the tragedy of tiie event is that politi¬cal life is not really serious. Dean Booth’sletter reflects this very well. What do theideas that Richard Flacks' write aboutmean to him? How serious for him areBundy's and Daley’s inhuman acts? To thisDean Booth says that Richard Flacksshould be allowed to continue his “splendidneedling”. The model of tolerance whichDean Booth posits is the classical liberalone. How relevant was it to Nazi Germany,South Africa, and Greece today. Are therenot other times in history when mens’ ac¬tions require that we resist them and pro¬test their right to be heard? But this is justfascism of the left a voice cries. No, it justrecognizes that the perpetrators of aggres¬sion, imperialism and police brutality arenot worth of membership in the commu¬nity of ideas”.Peter Stone '69Flacks IrresponsibleThe letter by Richard Flacks in your is¬sue of November 8 calls for professionalcomment. Without taking much space, Iwould like to make two comments. mentary sociological principles regardingroles. A man as a person and the holder ofan office or position are quite distinctthings. To confuse the two, as is donethroughout this letter by Professor Flacks,is irresponsible.2. It is also irresponsible to concur in hisbeing “widely seen internationally as awar criminal” in view of the great com¬plexity of the “war criminal” category andits equivocal status within the field of law.One may hold that view of a man person¬ally, but as a sociologist one does have toacknowledge the intricacies of this prob¬lem. On this topic, of war criminality, I doclaim to have tried seriously to understandthe question; Professor Flacks’ commentsindicate that he has not done so. Yet thisalso is a professional topic on whichserious scholarly work has been done.C. Arnold AndersonProfessor of Education and SociologyFaculty UniteIn his letter (November 12) Mr Lewontinasks, “How many faculty members bandedtogether to make a public denunciation and.demonstrative opposition to the monstrousbehavior of our mayor?”I can answer that question becauseshortly after the Democratic convention Ihelped organize Citizens for a Free Chi¬cago, which circulated a statement de¬nouncing the mayor’s actions as “a sym-pton of autocratic government in this city and of a dangerous wave of anti-libertariansentiment in the U.S.”The statement included sponsorship of ademonstration on September 28 “in orderto re-assert freedom of assembly in thiscity, and to speak out against suppressionof dissent and the use of government se¬curity forces for political intimidation.”Some 5C0 Chicagoans signed that state¬ment, of which 38 of us were University ofChicago faculty members. Knowing thatmany of our faculty members were awayon vacation in September and not wantingsponsorship of the demonstration to bemainly a University of Chicago effort, Iworked harder at getting signatures frompersons in positions of leadership else¬where in the city.I am certain that other University ofChicago faculty members who had notsigned the statement marched down Mich¬igan Avenue on September 28 with the 20,-000 persons who made, it the largest protestdemonstration in the history of Chicago.Some faculty members brought their wholefamilies. Professor Emeritus Robert Ha-vighurst was chairman of the subsequentrally in Grant Park. The demonstrationwas given extensive coverage on nation¬wide TV news that night, in the ChicagoSunday papers the next day, and in news¬papers as distant as London and Paris.Citizens for a Free Chicago, including itsUniversity of Chicago members, is holdinga conference November 16 of ChicagoansCommitted to Change to discuss strategiesfor a unified opposition to the Daley ma¬chine, police repression, racism and mili¬tarism. Does that answer your question?Robert A. LeVineProfessor of Human Developmentand AnthropologyCo-Chairman,Citizens for a Free ChicagoBad ResponseThe published faculty response to Mr.Blacks’ letter would be disappointing if wehad not learned to expect so little.Mr. Schwab leads the pack with jokesand insults. To come to disagreeable con¬clusions about Mr Levi’s loyalties makes a man a scoundrel, it seems. To discoverwhere a man stands we need either chem¬istry of psychoanalysis unless we are will¬ing to take Mr Levi at his word, and MrSchwab at his. Now Mr Schwab is entitledto any opinion he can argue for, but noteveryone who disagrees with him is amadman or a liar or a fool and some ofthem even have tenure on the faculty.Miss Mentschikoff is distressed by igno¬rance “of the most elementary facts”:someone has suggested that Mr Levi’sdream has turned into a nighmare. Theman is a saint; that should close the dis¬cussion. Do we want a religious war on ourhands?Messrs Ashenhurst, Goldsmith, Kolb andSimpson think the Inauguration dinner is“an appropriate means of reaffirming theUniversity’s relationship with the commu¬nity.” Too true. The point, however, is howthe University’s “community” should bedefined; to whom are we beholden and forwhat? If men who are directly implicatedin great social and political evils are theUniversity’s best friends is there no causefor concern? Has the decency of the Uni¬versity no relationship to the decency of itsenvironment?Mr. Booth sees the point but does not con¬sider that it bears on particular moralchoices. The question his letter implies(Sure, we’re in trouble, but what can wedo about it?) is too important to try totreat it in this space, but let me ask thedean a few easier ones for openers: If wetake money from the government or theFord Foundation do we have to invite MrBundy to dinner? If the University does infact depend on “moral lepers” for its sur¬vival (granting that your moral leper maybe my cup of tea), how long can we expectthem to let us “pursue our educational ob¬jectives freely”? And, just for fun, supposeMayor Daley had had the kids beaten upbefore the dinner invitations were sent out.Who would have scratched him from thelist? If nobody did, would Mr Lewontin beundermining academic freedom by havingdinner elsewhere?Philip Fertik, '71Dignitaries Meet at LuncheonNoted national and international digni¬taries, delegates from universities, andrepresentatives of government, business,and labor wined and dined at PresidentEdward H. Levi’s inaugural luncheonThursday in Hutchinson Commons.The guest speakers at the luncheon wereformer University presidents George W.Beadle and Robert M. Hutchins.The luncheon, attended by 450 people,followed the inaugural convocation inRockefeller Chapel.Hutchins, in his speech following theluncheon, reminisced about the Chicago ofthe past and speculated on the Chicago ofthe future.Referring to the changes which have oc¬curred during the past ten years within theUniversity, Hutchins said, “Who wouldhave thought in the 50s that in the 60swe would be yearning for students who areapathetic.”In the same vein, he commented “Who would have thought that black studentswould be asking for segregated housing.Also, who would have thought that the ad¬ministration would want students to be¬come interested in extra-curricular activi¬ties.”Hutchins concluded his speech by notingthat Levi is equipped to cope with theproblems which plague the University andthat under him the University will un¬doubtedly continue in its fine traditions.Beadle praised Levi for his past work,and he expressed optimism for the job heexpects Levi to do.A dinner for the 1200 faculty and guestssponsored by the University trustees washeld at Ida Noyes Hall Thursday evening.Admission to the dinner was by ticket only,and close security was kept to preventuninvited persons from entering the build¬ing. After the dinner the dinner guests at¬tended a concert by the New York Pro Mu-sica held in Rockefeller Chapel. CAN’T AFFORD NEW FURNITURE ?TRY THECATHOLIC SALVAGE MIREAUTRUCKLOADS ARRIVING DAILY3514 S. MICHIGAN 10 I. 41st STREETJESSELSON’SSERVING HYut PARK FOR OVER 30 YEARSWITH THE VERY BEST AND FRESHESTFISH AMD SEAFOODPL 2-2870, PL 2-8190, DO 3-9186 1340 E. 53rdax (Brook.<ax <x>roo.*rrxCLEANERS* TAILORS • LAUNDERERS #Phones: serving campus since 1917Ml 3-7447 1013- 17 E. 61st ST., near EllisFA 4-3500 * 174 E. 55th ST., newr Woodlawn The Cultural Affairs Committee of SACis presenting a lecture byGregory Mankopoulosand a showing of his film“The llliac Passion”Centre Theatre 25 E. JacksonWed. Nov. 20 - 7:30 pm - donation $1.75HOBBY CENTERSLOT RACING HDQ.CHEMICAL APPARATUS “H.O” “N” TRAINROCKETS &ROCKET SUPPLIESARTS & CRAFTSTOYS, MODELS,GAMES, ETC.OPEN SUNDAYS2116 E. 71stCOUNTRY HOUSERESTAURANT ********** MORGAN’S CERTIFIED SUPER MART* ComJt floristIn the heart ofSouth Chicago7100 So. Yates 363-9842 4*CHlCAGO, ILL 6061545*ij. Phone: FA 4J6JJ Open to Midnight Seven Days a Weekfor your Convenience1516 E. 53rd. ST..tl '-V'.'isY: Dependable Serviceon your Foreign Car493-6633 ■Hyde Park Auto Service • 7646 S. Stony Island • 734-6393Same Day 5 Hr. Cleaning No Extra ChargeCustom Quality Cleaning 10% Student Discount1362 E. 53rd 752-6933November 15. 1968 i:The Chicago Maroon.r Shi is Defends the Private UniversityProfessor Edward Shils praised the roleof the private university in the academicworld and society in a panel discussionyesterday on “The Role and Future of thePrivate University.”Speaking in Mandel Hall in conjunctionwith ceremonies for the Levi inauguration,Shils, of the committee on social thought,based his talk on his paper of the sametopic.The panelists included Father TheodoreM. Hesburgh, president of Notre DameUniversity; Jerry Lipsch, class of ’68 andpresident of Student Government; RobertMcPherson, graduate student in education;Michael Mussa, graduate student in Eco¬nomics; and Nathan Pusey, president ofHarvard University. Kenneth Clark, authorand president of the Metropolitan AppliedResearch Center, was scheduled to partici¬pate but was not in attendance. Edward W.Rosenheim, professor of English, served asmoderator.Professor Shils cited the rising propor¬tion of public degrees and the inevitableprospect of increased federal researchfunding in raising the question of whetheror not private universities should continueto exist. He noted a tradition in the privateuniversity which cannot be manufacturedin that the university is not an agregatebut rather a whole, unique in financing,structure and intellect.The comparative “smallness” in relationto the land grant schools helps the univer-sity to “respond discriminately to the de¬ mands of society” and makes possible spe¬cial quality of “awareness.” Realizing theoccasion of his paper, he says that the uni¬versity president must serve not in thedominant power structure (which haslargely passed to the faculty) but as onecenter of moral guidance.Father Hesburgh focused on the differ¬ence between a public and private univer¬sity in that the “private university can besmaller and thus integrate and move to¬gether in a community” both in the dimen¬sion of theological knowledge and in that ofa life through values.Jerry Lipsch altered the tone of the dis¬cussion in saying that the institutional con¬straints to which the private university issubject are even more serious than thoseinflicted on the public institution. He said“it is not that each individual facultymember is so obliged by the Trustees.. .itis rather a larger institutional process ofwhat types of projects are funded. It is amore dangerous threat than political pres¬sure because it conditions mens minds.”President Pusey pointed out that in hisopinion there are not great differences be¬tween the public and private universities.He noted the intimate size of Santa Cruzand the lack of coherence in “certain greatprivate institutions,” and called for aunited action by the two types of univer¬sities in the pursuit of educational goals.McPherson moved the focus of the dis¬cussion to the private university’s relation-ship to the community. He stated that “the university must respond to the demands ofsociety.. .and must be hospitable within itsborders.” Mussa said that large amountsof outside financial support for researchundermine the quality of teaching on boththe graduate and undergraduate levels.Friday, November 15RECRUITING VISIT: Texaco, Inc., Beacon, New York,Port Arthur and Bellaire, Texas, Montebello,California, and Rlchmone, Virginia. All degreelevels in chemistry, math, geophysical sciences,and statistics. M.S. in information sciences.Call ext. 3284 for appointment.ART EXHIBIT: "A Century of East European JewishImmigration" at Hillel. Until November 26.SEMINAR: "Analysis of Security Prices." Researchin security prices of the graduate school ofbusiness. Semi-annual conference conducted bythe Center. Call ext. 3186.CORNERSTONE LAYING: Joseph Regenstein Library,. 3:30 pm.SEMINAR: "DNA Subunits and Replication Patternsin Mannaliam Chromosomes," Dr. J. H. Taylor,Florida State University. Research Institutes480, 4 pm.OPEN MEETING: "Conversations on New Politics,"Paul Wismer - a Chicago politician's view ofChicago politics. Blue Gargoyle, 7 pm.DOC FILMS: "Intolerance" by D.W. Griffith, CobbHall, 7:15 and 9:15 pm.FOLK DANCE PARTY: Ida Noyes Theater, 7:30 pm.LECTURE: "Problems of Jewish Power: Jews andArabs in Israel," Rabbi Daniel Lelfer. HillelHouse, 8:30 pm.MIXED MEDIA: Poetry reading - blues dance con¬cert, Blue Gargoyle, Mandel Hall, 9 pm. Ad¬vance tickets $1. A discussion followed the formal presen¬tations. Jerry Lipsch repeated his criticismas student Christopher Hobson shoutedfrom the back of the hall “They’re allagainst you, Jerry.”Saturday, November 16THEATER INTERVIEWS: Hull House TheateiT^sT theJane Addams Center, 3212 N. Broadway, 2-5pm.CROSS-COUNTRY: University of Chicago Track ClubOpen Four-Mile Run, Washington Park, 3:30 pmSunday, November 17OISCUSSIONS: NCD Small Group Discussions, C6bbLounge, 2 pm.CHESS MATCH: Wilson City College vs U. Chicago"A" Team, Ida Noyes 3rd floor, 3 pm.SUNDAY EVENING AT BONHOEFFER HOUSE: "AnEvening of Exploring Mysteries," BonhoefferHouse, 5554 S. Woodlawn. Supper (75c), 5:30;Program, 6:30 pm.CONTEMPORARY FILMS: "The Wrong Box,' CobbHall, 7 and 9 pm.FILM: Evening of experimental films - "The Key,""Ezekiel," and "The Possibilities of Agam,"Hillel, 8 pm. 75c admission.Monday, November 18FILM: "The Hunters" sponsored by the African Studies Association, Social Science 122, 7:30 pm.MEETING: Lutheran student wives. Speaker MarshallPatner. Jeff Fort's lawyer. Home of Ann Cross¬men, 824 E. 58th. 8 pm.FOLK CONCERT: "Joni Mitchell in Concert," MandelHall, 8:30 pm. Tickets at Mandel Hall BoxOffice daily, 11 am - 2 pm, S3, $2.50, $2.BULLETIN OF EVENTS°PWiUUs 3Lu,er Sk“FLOWERS FOR ALL OCCASIONS1308 EAST 53rd STREET VWWWVVVWVVWVVI'VIVWTYoudontetobe =*to drinkmis oft.Just “hip’’. DoesCONSUMERREPORTShave anything tosay to the student?You bet it does!See the current issuefor detailed reports onGUITARS • PORTABLEELECTRIC TYPEWRITERSRECORD CHANGERS*SCOTCHES f CARPET CITY6740 STONY ISLAND324-7998Has what you need from a $10used 9 x 12 Rug, to a custon■ carpet. Specializing in Rem¬nants & Mill returns at ai fraction of the original cost. L (VOLVO)Decoration Colors and Qual¬ities. Additional 10% Discount iwith this Ad.FREE DELIVERYIVVVV'VWWVVVVVVVVVVVV KEEP INFORMEDRead the ISRAEL andiMIDDLE EAST NEWS*LETTER. For info andsample copy send $1 toP.O. Box 2331, Sunnyvale,Calif. 94087 Yolvos lost an averageof II years in Sweden.They average about aday and a half in our showroom.Hutchinson CommonsOpenMon. thru Fri. - 7:00 A.M. - 11:30 PMSat. 10:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M. I In- Ih’-I rtM-tin f.11 1.11 \ ill” .1 \i.Im, Uv.m.r j| |.,.Uhxiirth Imw Ion;: mi* iloit t "ii.ii.inli***. lint w»* ilo know lli.it oxrr' "I .'II tin' \oko» 11-1.1111,1 in |||,. | mi, ,| M.iir. i„ ill,. I.liI I vi’iir- .iit- -till on ill,, ro.nl.I lio l„..| iim.oii lor Inn ii)o ,, \oI\o now. i- Iii-i .ih-c Ii.iw., low in .look. \nil 11 .nikU. wo don't o\|iool to li.m- llioniiiromnl too Ion".\\ lii. lt In in-- 111> .in 11il.-r.-—I iijtr |i.ir.nlo\ .ilionl \olvo.. (tinnii.loinor. liko to linx tlinin Iioo.,u5o.tl,ov |,„|. \\.- IIthem liooiin.o lliei ilon'l.Come and Enjoy Fine FoodANDERSON’SBULKOSERVICE STATIONHIGHEST QUALITY GASOLINEAT. LOWEST PRICESFEATURING THEBULKO PANTRYA complete Grocery StoreOPEN 24 HOURS PIZZAPLATTERPizza, Fried ChickenItalian FoodsCompare the Price!1460 E. 53rd Ml 3-2800WE DELIVER LUCHINO VOLVO SALES &SERVICE CENTER, INC.7720 STONY ISLAND AVE.CHICAGO, ILL. 60649 RE 1-3800STUDIO OF THE DANCE VFLAMENCO — PRIMITIVEMODERNMU 4-1173 In Harper Court5210 HarperThe Chicago Maroon HELP KEEP OURSTREETS BEAUTIFUL ... La protection financidre que vousdonnez a votre famille aujourd’huidevra lui etre procure d’une autrefagon demain. L’assurance Sun Lifepeut certainement accomplir cettetache a votre place.MAKE YOURimports, inc. NEXT CAR2235 S. MICHIGAN326-2550 En tant que representant local de la SunLife, puis-je vous visiter a un moment devotre choix?Ralph J. Wood,Jr. CLUOne North LaSalle St. Chic. 60602FR. 2-2390 - 798-0470Office Hours 9 to 5 Mondays,others by appt.ran SUN LIFE DU CANADANovember 15, 1968MAROON CLASSIFIED ADSRATES: For University students,faculty, and staff: 50 cents peri |jne, 40 cents per repeat line.For non-University clientele:75 cents per line, 60 cents perrepeat line. Count 30 charactersand spaces per line.All ads must be prepaid.TO PLACE AD: Come or mailwith payment to The ChicagoMaroon Business Office, Room304 of Ida Noyes Hall, 1212 E.;yth St., Chicago, III. 60637.No ads will be taken over thephone.DEADLINES: ALL CLASSIFIEDADS FOR TUESDAY MUST BEIN BY FRIDAY. ALL CLASSI¬FIED ADS FOR FRIDAY MUSTBE IN BY WEDNESDAY. NOEXCEPTIONS. TEN A.M. TO3:30 P.M. DAILYFOR FURTHER INFORMATION:Phone Midway 3-0800, Ext. 3266.RIDES & RIDERS Cannon Guild Harpsichord; 2 yearsold, excellent condition. ContactPaula Shevick: 955-3768 or 1-219-883-1400.'64 VOLVO B18 Jim Johnson 288-9268. Person good at figures for book¬keeping. (male) 2 nites per week11:00 P.M. until 7:00 A.M. Do notapply unless you plan to stay thru-out summer months. Mr. LarsonFA 4-6100.1 ’65 MG 1100 Good cond. F.M.$650 or offer. 752-1361 or 375-5340.Riders Wanted: Share expenses toPalm Beach, Fla. Not more thanSi00 round trip. Commercial Pilotflying fully equipt twin engine air¬plane. Lv. Nov. 27 return Dec. 1.Norton Richards 955-6993.Need ride to Frisco right afterfinals. Share dr'ving and exp's.Call David, 64 Hitchcock.I NEED A RIDE TO CALIFORNIA.Barnaby: 955-4020.FOR SALEWarm, goodlooking Winter Coat.Medium, Brand new—never worn.$75 Val. for $40. 363-3768.FILM35+16mmEditorl6mm 667-4639.Cures man and beast. Jarman andMitchell, Ida Noyes, 8:00 Sat.Just drafted—Double bed. Brandnew $75 or best offer. 752-4733.Good used TVs reconditioned. $24.95& up. American Radio 1300 E. 53rd53 Kimbark Plaza.Stereo Components at Discounts.A.R., DYNA, DUAL, KLH. MUSI-CRAFT: Campus Rep. Bob Tabor,324-3005.FRENCH HORN, 177 Farkas doub¬le, med. bore, $260. Effective sales'date Dec. 15th, John Fenner, 111Boucher, 915 E. 53 St. Horn in veryfine condition.Praktisix 6x6 cm mono-reflexcamera with outstanding Zeiss lens.Biometar 2.8:80 for $100.00; VivitarTL4 Super 8mm with CineZoom1:1.8; 8.5—35mm; almost new for$125.00; call 324-8200, #572.TIRES, 4 14', 1 snow for Volks orVolvo, reasonable. MU 4-7838. '62 Buick Skylark 2 dr. HT, V-8,Radio, Power steering, 4-spd. trans.,extras. $495. 493-8161.FOR RENTROOMMATES WANTED: 2 gradstu. need 3rd, own room, 5810 Har¬per, 752-7689.Furnished room: 493-3328.Room & bath in large house forstudent or couple (grad, pref.) inexch. for babysitting 2 children.Hours, food, kitchen priv. 8, pos¬sible pay all open. East HP onCampus bus rf. 363-5450 after 6.RECOMMENDED by L. HandelsmanStu. Govt. Short-term lease, 2 weeksfree. Nearby, economical, newlydec. unfurn. apts. 2 & 3V4 rms.$75, $89.50. Free gas and elec.Clean, Quiet. Williams, 6043 Wood-lawn.NEAR UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO3-5 room apartments, all with tile-baths 8. showers. Ideal for stu¬dents, interns, nurses, young cou¬ples. NO CHILDREN. Rental $85-$105 call RE 4-4141. PEOPLE FOR SALE1 will REPAIR anything! cheaprates. Guarantee. Myron 955-0076.THINGS TO DOEat your liver.Bite your tongue.Commit variousindecencies. other anatomicalTYPINGTerm Papers, Theses typed. IBMelec. 40c/page. Mrs. Cohen 338-5242evngs.Thesis typing — 568-3056 eve.Typing low rates. 363-5609 eve.May I do your typing? 363-1104.PEOPLE WANTEDNeed sitter for delightful 9 mo. oldoccasional Wed. mornings. 5550Dorchester Ave. 955-4966.DESK CLERK (male) 3 nights perweek. 12:00 Midnite until 8:00 A.M.Do not apply unless you plan tostay thruout summer of '69. Apply:Quadrangle Club, 1155 East 57th St.Senior or Graduate Student wantedto lead a humanistically orientedjunior high group Sundays 10:30 to12:30 A.M. Call 922-5561 or 643-4753.Good typist, part-time, afternoons.Hyde Park Medical Lab, 493-2000.JJIMJULUI IJUULUOUiii iiii COTJjTHE BEST OF SHOW £ TJ™Imrinnnnnmr boob rawgryrgTnry^ewews,plus improvisations by the NEW OLD FASHIONEDBAROQUE COMPASS PLAYERS (after the DanceFestival) Friday & Saturday, 10:30 P.M.HARPER THEATER COFFEE HOUSE— 5238 So. Harper—11 — ; •Also Theater Workshop FREESaturday Afternoon 1:30-4:00 THE RADICAL'S USE OF HIS¬TORY. A Discussion-debate withJessie Lemisch, former professorof history, U. of C.; StaughtonLynd, former professor of history,Yale 8. Roosevelt U.; Donald Scott,assistant professor of history, U.of C.; his lovely wife Joan Scott,lecturer in history, U. of C. Anotherprogram in NUC's Critical Univer¬sity. THURSDAY, Nov. 21, 8 P.M.,Blue Gargoyle.See the Business Office about hiringon as staff mad bomber. First job:our printers.ARE YOU READYFOR THIS?1. That real Motorcycle Gang, aRadically Motivated Group, name-fully: The Royal Mounted Gestapo,presents its (United) Frcnt Group;2. U.S. Animal & the Male Men.We specialize in Prole-Rock (noPost-Office gigs, Willy).3. U.S.A. is CUMIN' to your cam¬pus. We need: (a) a time; (b) aplace; (c) a devoted drummer (youhip, Doug Mitchell?)4. We got: (a) Picasso fux fer allthe ladies, Free (no scairt 111' girlsnor Gents from Faery land needapply) (b) An arthropod Journalfor all you hairless Academic Ve¬getables; (c) The Cultural Revvin'Machine (Mao's Thoughts, XXX11:1)SDS, PL, Etc.: Shee-it or git off'nthe Pot! (If you plastic Radicalsdon't like it here, go back to highschool where you came from!)5. Changes: (a) The Bass KilledGawd (b) (s) Spock dropped Acidfor an on-the-ground trip with puresweet chocolate; (c) The OrphicOutlaws 8< the R.M.G. had a littlebop 8. U.S. Animal wasted PrettyBoy Orpheus dm cornin' after yew,Rydice!).6. President-Schmesident Levi: (a)don't send Brother J. Phariseearound to OUR meetin's unless he'sready to ride with us. (b) don'thang out with pigs like Brundage,Bundy, Daley: it ain't Kosher. OrHEALTHY, (c) ride with us, or:some fine mornin' at 3 A.M. youhear a knock on your door. Wegot the Final Solution to the You-ishProblem. Remember, in 'Murica,Every Day is election day: ifyou're one of the Chosen People,Hang in There!7. Cats 8< Chicks, if you (a) wantto book us into the Blue Gargle,the Bandaidsnap, Dorms, Frats,Rallies, Picnics, American LegionClambakes, etc. (b) wan* to joinup our gang (we got Appolonian,Dionysian and Sartorial InitiationRites, and a Helluvalotta ACTION,not to mention Cultural Revvin')(c) jes' gettin' curiouser 8. curiouserwhy then: WRITE US (conqueryour Telephone Hangup) c/o StudentMale Box, U.S. Anthropology Dept.,ABYSSINIANKITTENS: Male & Female, Pet and Show.Registered CFA. From $75.MU 4-7838 1126 E. 59th St. Chicago 60637. ORlook for me on campus: UlyssesS. Animal, Energy Jobber (yourfriendly local no. 1. Try me: mybark is a heavy vibration, but mybite is only a nip). P.S. We areNOT an Equal Opportunities Thang:we dig chocolate people: 99'/j timesbetter than plain old vanilla.PERSONALSCHRISTMAS CHARTER: N.Y.-Lon-don-N.Y. Dec. 17-Jan. 11. $189. 288-3728.INTOLERANCE—Tonight, Cobb Hall,7 and 10. NOTE TIME CHANGE,doc films.Try wrapping fish in your radio.Is Ida Noyes ready for JARMAN8. MITCHELL? Or Bowie or Fa¬vors? Find out Tomorrow at 8:00P.M.Diana Ross canned at the Bander-snatch.For a little bit of the Bronx trythe Court House's potato pancakeswith thick sour cream.Or apple sauce for the goys.PROBLEMS OF JEWISH POWER:JEWS -AND ARABS IN ISRAEL.Rabbi Daniel I. Leifer, HillelHouse, tonight, 8:30 P.M.PLUS is the enema of Harper Ct.TIME CHANGE: Intolerance—2ndshowing at 10, not 9:30. doc films.Folk-singer, composer JONI MIT¬CHELL will present a live, in-person concert at Mandel Hall,Monday, Nov. 18 at 8:30 P.M.Tickets are available daily at theMandel Hall Box Office, 11 A.M.to 2 P.M.Christian Science Meeting, Tues.,7:15, Thorndike Hilton Chapel. AllWelcome.YOGA — transcend depression, an¬xiety, ennui. Sri Nerode DO 3-0155.I'd go to Jeff Carp with my drugproblem. I'd say "Hey baby, wherecan I connect with a key, likereel fast?"—Fearless Fuxxdick.U.C.'s answer to the push buttonsociety—juke box playing at theBandersnatch.After a movie at the Hyde Park,have a burger at the Court House.SKI ASPEN. 8 days, 9 meals, alltows, round-trip jet, taxes, $199.Dec. 14. 764-6264.Interested in Israel? Come hearSimcha Dinitz Nov. 25, 6:45 P.M.PLUS is a capitalist exploiter.Read Richard Joseph in Esquire?Take his column and your check¬book to AAARCO POLO and they'llmatch them up. 288-5944.WRITER'S WORKSHOP—PL 2-8377.HOW MUCH YOU MAYSAVE ON YOUR CARINSURANCE WITHSTATE FARMFrank SpineIIi1369 E. 53rd. ST.955-3133STATE FARMMu’ual Automobile Insurance CompanyHome Office: Bloomington, Illinois Sunday at 8:00 P.M.—AN EVENINGOF EXPERIMENTAL FILM. "TheKey," "Ezekiel," and "The Possi¬bilities of Agam." Hillel House.Have your own celebration of theBig Event of the Bander this week¬end.WHO JONI MITCHELL IS:She wrote Ian & Sylvia's hit:CIRLE GAME. She'll even singthis song Monday Night.It may not be the Hilton . . . butthen, we're not Daily either.There is a new exhibit of photo¬graphs and documents entitled "A IHall. D. W. Griffith's INTOLER¬ANCE (plus our own special an¬nouncements) at 7 and 10. Stillonly 75c.Tired of box lunches? Try Psi U.Sat. nite.Go to hell Joe Schwab.Piggies: you better patronize Tank,your local classifieds merchant, orone of these mornins you're gonnawake up screamin'. Yours tillsummertime, Ulysses S. Animal.Nifter.PLUS eats smash PLUSCentury of East European Immi¬gration" at Hillel House untilNovember 26.In the afternoon of November 19,1968, Mr. Richard Boardman, As¬sistant Professor of Law, TheColumbus School of Law, TheCatholic University of America,Washington, D.C., will be visitingthe University to recruit studentsfor next September.The curriculum is independent ofsectarian control and is orientedtoward the practice of law. Theyare interested in students of allbackgrounds and traditions.For appointments with Mr. Board-man, please contact the Office ofCareer Counseling and Placement.Come to Room 202 in the ReynoldsClub, or call extension 3282.The Middle Eastern Conflict—howdid if all begin? Find out Mon.Nov. 25, 6:45 P.M. at Hillel House."There is a temptation to compareJONI MITCHELL to Judy Collinsand Joan Baez, and it must be acomparison weighted in Miss Mit¬chell's favor." See her in concertat Mandel Hall next Monday, Nov.18, 8:30 P.M.LIFE IS TOO SHORT FOR GAMES.Wld like to meet or corr w warmwhlsm yng worn w strng snse humvis. Am grad stud, 28. John Er-skine, 123 Winspear Ave., Buff.N.Y. 14214.JARMAN AND MITCHELL arecoming. 11/16, Ida Noyes Hall, 8:00P.M.NOTE TIME CHANGE: INTOLER¬ANCE, tonight, Cobb Hall, 7 and10. doc films.Odd Job is an honorary memberof the UC Karate Club.Introducing the newest group oncampus—Students for Israel-'—comemeet us and hear Simcha DinitzMon. Nov. 25, 6:45 P.M.PLUS salesgirls are sweat hogs.Israeli folk dancing meets everyThursday at Ida Noyes from 7:30to 10:00 P.M.URGENT—that you see Intolerance—D. W. Griffith's not-to-be-missedsilent epic—at Cobb Hall tonight,7 and 10, doc films.Weird folks raise weird kids. I'mglad they do.Who JONI MITCHELL is:She wrote Dave Van Ronk's hits:CLOUDS and CHELSEA MORNING.She sings these songs when inconcert.The Chairman of the Board ofTrustees, Fairfax M. Cone, says:"I enjoy the classifieds.'THANKSGIVING DINNER at Ah¬mad's? You'd better believe it.Turkey, naturally, or ham dinner.Watch this page for more details.Doc Films' farewell performance:for this quarter—tonight at Cobb Who JONI MITCHELL IS:She wrote Judy Collins' hits: BOTHSIDES NOW and MICHAEL MOUN¬TAINS. JONI sings these songswhen in concert.Last Chance—to see a doc filmspresentation this quarter. Tonight-INTOLERANCE—D. W. Griffiths'silent epic of bigotry through theages. 7 and 10 P.M. Cobb Hall."WHAT PRICE ISRAEL?" A lec¬ture by Alfred Lilienthal, prominentanti-Zionist lecturer and author.Room D2 Lecture Center, U. of I.,Circle Campus, Monday Nov. 18,3:00 P.M. Sponsored by Organiza¬tion of Arab Students.SIR, it is not a PLUS factor thatyou have referred to my SITophobia,but I do LOVE your SALIENT andVOLuble puns.Protest Funnite, 8 P.M. Sat., Neigh¬borhood Club, 5480 Kimbark. Stu¬dents 75c.Protest FUNNITE?STUDENTS FOR ISRAEL presentsSimcha Dinitz of the Israeli Em¬bassy speaking on origins of theconflict in the Middle East. Mon¬day Nov. 25, 6:45 P.M. Hillel House,5715 Woodlawn.Tickets for Nov. 18 JONI MIT-CHELL CONCERT at Mandel HallBox Office from 11 A.M. to 2P.M. daily. Reserved seats: $3.Others: $2.50, $2. /Do your thing at 1Women FREE Men Psi U Sat.50c. 9—?Yes Fans, the UC Karate team willdisplay craft and cunning, honedto perfection by the Hyde Parklife we know and love so well:Intercollegiate Competition Sat.Nov. 16 at 2 P.M. Boucher Hall.Admission by I. D.Any student interested in smallseminar on Machine Politics callBarbara, 955-5036. Also faculty toteach.'99ZC '4*3 '0080-C AeMpiyy auogd:Noixvwdojni asHiand aodAiiva w-d oc;cOl WV N31 SNOIid3DX3ON 'AVOS3N03M A9 Nl 39isnw Avaidd dOd sav astdi-issvtd *nv ’Avaidd ab ni39 isnw Avassni dOd savasidissvno nv :s3Nnav3a'auoqd3iU j3ao ua^ej aq him spe on7C909 ‘III 'Obeoiio "js M46S3 ZtZL 'lien ssAon ep| jo foe! luooa '331440 sssuisng uoojewo6eo.no sqi oj juawAed qj|Mliew jo 3W00 :av 3DVTd Ol-piedSJd aq jsnui spe nv’3u;i J3d saoeds pue| sjapejeqo oc liinoo sun leads;Jdd siuao 09 '3Uj| J3d siuao Si:a|3|ua!|3 A|;sJ3A!un-uou joj*3u(| leads; J3d sjuao of 'sumjad s|U33 OS U4e|S pue 'Aunoei'siuapnjs Aj!SJ3Aiun JOd :S31Vdsav aiuissvD NooavwJ\Jew^ntage *800^In a TimeofTormentmmwmmiw^wPfjBrawainifs^iifD»«5i8J8M8firRB»Kn^88S8MSIN A TIME OF TORMENTby I. F. StoneAmerica’s most dis¬tinguished independentjournalist examines keyissues and personalities:LBJ, Vietnam, Fulbright,The Negro, The Kennedys,The Left, The Right.V-439 $1.95.MAN AGAINST POVERTY:WORLD WAR IIIEdited byArthur I. Blaustein andRoger R. WoockThe most comprehensivecollection of present daythought on virtually allaspects of poverty bysuch figures as MartinLuther King, BarbaraWard and Michael Har¬rington. V-81 $2.45. CITIES IN A RACEWITH TIME STUOIESby Jeanne R. LoweAn interpretation — ac¬claimed by the experts— of the most importantexperiences of certainAmerican cities in tack¬ling urban and humandecay. A Vintage GiantV-469 $2.95. by Jean PiagetIn English for the firsttime, these essays onmental development arean incisive summary ofthe work of the eminentSwiss psychologist. V-462$1.65. THE RESPONSIBLEELECTORATEby V. 0. Key, Jr.with the assistance ofMilton C. Cummings, Jr.The rationality in presi¬dential voting between1936-1960 is analyzed byan examination of votingstatistics and data onvoting behavior. V-470$1.65. >lr • 'v. >Ancw<« Ab<MEGYPT: Military Societyby Anouar Abdel-MalekHistory of 15 years ofEgypt's national revolu¬tion 1952-1967 with em¬phasis on the army re¬gime, the Left, and socialchange under Nasser.V-428 $1.95.HO CHI MINHby Jean LacoutureThe first major biogra¬phy of this puzzling worldfigure... by the authorof Vietnam Between TwoTruces. V-215 $1.95. THE ARTIST’S JOURNEYINTO THE INTERIORand other essaysby Erich HellerWith grace, wit and eru¬dition, one of the lead¬ing critics of Germanliterature examines thecharacteristic quali¬ties of modern Germanthougnt from Goethe toWittgenstein.V-438$1.65. SecreTllor,tailVietname jTHE SECRET SEARCH FORPEACE IN VIETNAMby David Kraslow &Stuart H. LooryIn unprecedented detail,this book reveals for thefirst time the labyrin¬thine course of peacediplomacy accompanyingthe escalation of theVietnam war. V-152$1.95. NIETZSCHEPhilosopher,Psychologist, Antichristby Walter KaufmannAn updated, expandedversion of a highly re¬garded, many-facetedstudy of Nietzsche’sunique contribution tophilosophy and psychol¬ogy. A Vintage Giant.V-436 $2.45. THE WISDOM OFINSECURITYA Message for an Ageof Anxietyby Alan W. WattsThe foremost Western in¬terpreter of Zen Buddhismasserts that highest hap¬piness is found only inawareness that imper¬manence and insecurityare inescapable. V-468$1.45.THE DISSENTINGACADEMY™.^ $■**tTHE DISSENTINGACADEMYEdited byTheodore RoszakEssays criticizing theAmerican academicworld, condemning itsdryness and introversion,urging it to programs ofsocially responsible ac¬tion. V-472 $1.95.THE MILITARY HALFby Jonathan SchellThe author of The Villageof Ben Sue describes thedestruction of ruralSouth Vietnam by theU.S. military, committedto destroying, as opposedto U.S. civilians abroad,intent on rebuilding.V-435 $1.65. FANSHENA Documentary ofRevolution in aChinese Villageby William HintonThe agonizing story ofrural China in turmoil asseen in the life of a sin¬gle northern Chinese vil¬lage on the eve of theCommunist takeover. AVintage Giant. V-465$2.95. CRISIS NOWJames M. GavinIn collaboration withArthur T. HadleyOne of the best informedcritics of the Vietnamesewar share his views onmajor issues facing theU.S. from “error abroadto squalor at home.’’V-434 $1.65. SEARCH FOR A METHODJean-Paul SartreSartre's attempt to purifyMarxism and enrich itwith existentialism issummarized and fore¬shadowed in this intro¬duction to his Critiqueof Dialectical Reason.V-464 $1.65. PRELUDE TO RIOTA View of Urban Americafrom the Bottomby Paul JacobsA blistering, superbly researched account of therotting inner-city coreand the officiousness,sluggishness and hope¬lessness of those pre¬suming to help. V-433$1.95. ADAM AND HIS WORKSCollected Stories ofPaul GoodmanFive new stories and vir¬tually the complete textsof the exuberant writer’sthree story collections:The Facts of Life, TheBreak-Up of our Camp,and Our Visit to Niagara.V-473 $1.95OTHER NEW TITLES: UNITY, FREEDOM & PEACE: A Blueprint for Tomorrow by Nelson ARockefeller V-355 $1.95 / THE WILL TO POWER by Friedrich Nietzche V-437 $2.95 /FROM ANATHEMA TO DIALOGUE: A Marxist Challenge to the Christian Churches byRoger Garaudy V-461 $1.45 / A LOSS OF MASTERY: Puritan Historians in ColonialAmerica by Peter Gay V-463 $1.65 / THE COLOSSUS and Other Poems by Sylvia PlathV-466 $1.25 / THE DRAGON: Fifteen Stories by Yevgeny Zamyatin V-467 $1.95 / 1848:THE MAKING OF A REVOLUTION by Georges Duveau V-471 $1.95 / REVOLUTIONARYIMMORTALITY: Mao Tse-tung and the Cninese Cultural Revolution by Robert Jay Litton V-474 $1.95 / THE ENLIGHTENMENT: The Rise of Modern Paganism by Peter Gay V-475$2.95 / FIRST SEASON by Israel Horovitz V-476 $1.65 / THE UNDERTAKING AND OTHERPLAYS by David Trainer V-477 $1.65 / COLLISION COURSE Edited by Edward ParoneV-478 $1.65 / TWO-FACTOR THEORY: The Economics of Reality by Louis 0. Kelso andPatricia Hetter V-482 $1.65 / SOVIET MARXISM by Herbert Marcuse V-480 $1.95 / ATIME OF WAR/A TIME OF PEACE by Sen. George McGovern V-481 $1.65 / DISOBEDI¬ENCE AND DEMOCRACY: Nine Fallacies on Law and Order by Howard Zinn V-483 $1.45.AnExhibition of Contemporary ArtFrom Chicago CollectorsArranged by Harold Rosenberg, Professor in theCommittee on Social Thought, in honor of theinauguration of Edward H. Levi as President ofThe University of ChicagoatTHE BERGMAN GALLERYCobb Halluntil Debember 9,1968Saturdays, 12 to 5 P.M.Closed Mondays Tuesdays through Fridays12 to 6 P.M.Works by:Albers, Ivan Albright, Arp, Avery,Bacon, Balthus, Bertoia, Brauner,Calder, Cornell, de Kooning, Delvaux,Dubuffet, Ernst, Giacometti, Gorky,Gottlieb, Grosz, Guston, Hofmann,Klee, Kline, Lasaw, Lipchitz,Margritte, Marin, Marini, Marisol,Masson, Matta, Miro, Neve I son,Picabia, Picasso, Rouault, Segal,Seligmann, Shahn, Smith, TanguyNew Administration November 15, 1968e NewAd ministrationB\ Roger BlackThe grey sky came down as it does inthe winter here and blended with thestained limestone of the gothic buildingsand the sooty greyness of the street. Thered and blue penants on the chapelwaved somewhat tensely in the heavymoist air; Edward Hirsch Levi, hisgleaming bald head covered by the blackmotorboard with the gold tassle walkedinconspicuously at the end of the longsteady procession of the University’s fac¬ulty in their outrageous medieval plu¬mage.If the University may be said to havegiven birth to any man, that man is Ed¬ward Levi. It was almost a birth by im¬maculate conception. His father was aHyde Park rabbi. His grandfather was aHyde Park rabbi, and a friend of Wil¬liam Rainey Harper, the first president.He started at the lab school at age fiveand then gradually made his waythrough U High, the College, and the lawschool. He became a professor of law,dean of the law school, provost of theUniversity, acting dean of the College,and now President. He lives and breath¬es the University of Chicago, its greyambiguities, and blunted purposes, itsfierce verbal devotion to the ideal of afree University, its anxious uncertaintieswith regard to its role in its variouscommunities, its ambivalence towardstudents—these are inextricable parts ofhis character.The administration building is one ofthe two buildings built during the drypost-war years (the other being the Fer¬mi Instistute). It was designed withmore than the usual lack of luster; itseems however that the various officesare quite suited to their purposes — thebursar’s, for example, reflects the dis¬dain the bureaucrats there have for ev¬eryone they have to deal with. The fifthfloor contains the offices of the presi¬dent, of the vice president for businessand finance, of the vice president anddean of faculties, and of the vice presi¬dent for development and public affairs.There the carpets are fairly new, thesecretaries are discretely screened offny Solar Bronze glass partitions, thedesks are modern and uncluttered, andeveryone conducts themselves with a de¬veloped sense of importance as thoughthey were in the Pentagon or the WhiteHouse.In a way they are. The fifth floor isthe University’s Pentagon and WhiteHouse rolled into one. Most of its in¬habitants have spent some time in Wash¬ington. Vice President Charles (Chuck)Daly, (development and public affairs)was staff assistant to Kennedy and John¬son (and, along with Lawrence O’Brienwas part of a four-man congressional lia-son team). Vice President John Wilson,(dean of faculties) — Levi’s successor asprovost, came back to the Universitythis year from the National ScienceFoundation, the agency which handlesmany of the government’s researchgrants, where he was deputy director.Vice President William Cannon, camefrom the Bureau of the Budget this yearto head the projects and programs of¬fice. Eddie Williams, Daly’s devel¬opment assistant has come from thestate department.The story goes that in 1964 when theUniversity was looking around for a di¬rector of public affairs, Levi went downto Washington and called Daly to ask himto lunch. Daly said in his gravellyslightly nasal voice, “Well, why don’tNovember 15, 1968 New AdministrationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO BOOKSTOREGENERAL BOOKS 35,000 TITLES IN STOCKREFERENCE BOOKS ALL MAJOR DISCIPLINESTEXTBOOKS — ALL RECOMMENDED AND REQUIREDTITLES FOR U. of C. COURSESANY TITLE IN PRINT MAY BE ORDEREDSUPPLIES ALL RECOMMENDED AND REQUIREDFOR U. of C. COURSESSTATIONERY - ALL TYPES COMMERCIAL AND SOCIALTYPEWRITERS-NEW AND USED-RENTALS & REPAIRSPHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES—CAMERAS, PROCESSING,FILM, PHOTO EQUIPMENT,TAPE RECORDERS, REPAIRSGIFTS — A VARIETY OF "U.C.” MOMENTOESFOOD — SNACK BAR AND BEVERAGESTOBACCO-CIGARETTS, CIGARS, PIPES, LIGHTERSBRANCH STORES: 65 E. South Water Street5821 5. Kimbark (Judd Hall)190 E. DelawareMAIN STORE—ON CAMPUS AT ELLIS & 58th4 New Administration November 15, 1968—tV.vV ri'iri » i1 »*r r.'*r: yd r*y~ "nu!1! i<j <*n*Y(Pyou come over and eat in the WhiteHouse mess?” And Levi is supposed tohave said, ‘‘I’ve already eaten there.Why don’t we go to some place better?”Levi had taken a leave of absencefrom the law school in 1940 and to go toWashington to be special assistant to theattorney general. In 1943 he was namedfirst assistant in the war division of theattorney general’s office; in 1914 he be¬came first assistant in the antitrust divi¬sion. In his life, Edward Levi hasworked in two places: Chicago andWashington. And so it is natural, as Levilooks to Chicago for faculty that heshould look to Washington for adminis¬trators.When he is asked about the problemsthe University faces, Levi generally listsfour areas: money, faculty, students,and the community. (The order willchange according to whom he is talkingto.) He sees that all the areas interact;a failure in any of them could destroythe University.The development projects, and businessoffices work in that first area, money.The development staff, led by MichaelI Claffey assistant vice president and aformer United Press International manin London has about a dozen members(as compared to Harvard’s 90). Theydraw up prospectuses and brochures anddo the groundwork for private fund rais¬ing. But it is the president and thetrustees (and Levi while he was provost)who do the actually contact the fat catsto get them to give their money to UC.The Campaign for Chicago, the three-year drive to find $160 million (it willextend to $350 million over ten years)comes to end next month, and it is cer¬tain to reach its first goal. But the drivecollected some money it did not expect, while not enough funds have not beenfound for the $14.5 million Village plan.This, combined with the million-dollarNational Science Foundation cut thisyear, and the prospect of a Nixon admin¬istration, cause a number of very seriousconcerns that don’t necessarily filterdown to students. The usual attitude ofstudents is the UC is very wealthy, and Dalyit is. But it uses its wealth at a furiousrate: faculty are paid the second highestsalaries in the country, and research iswide and expensive. The academic prior¬ities have always been first here, andthey depend on a great deal of money.Williams, who moved in this week, isClaffey’s counterpart in public affairs.He is the first black man executive onthe fifth floor and was in charge of thestate department’s equal opportunitiesprogram. Public affairs includes thepublic information office (on the thirdfloor), what used to be called public re¬lations, PR. PR sends out press releasesto newspapers and the other media onthe various activities of the University.Williams emphasizes that the public af¬fairs office is not trying to create an im¬age for the University; he says what im¬age it has derives from academic wordof mouth.Daly, who runs both offices, is the mostdistinctive (and the first) of the Wash¬ingtonians. He has imported somethingof a Georgetown cocktail circuit to HydePark — centered around his 56th streettownhouse. Daly was fiercely attached toJohn Kennedy, and somehow he hastransferred some of his devotion to theUniversity of Chicago. He has also trans¬ferred a few of his friends. He directsthe Center for Policy Study, which Levifirst thought of as a place where schol¬ars could rub up against policy makers(with, hopefully, a salutory effects on ev¬eryone). At least a few of the partici¬pants in the conferences the center holds(such as one on urban design which willbe held later this month) are Washingtonacquaintances of Daly’s.Cannon (projects and programs), isthe University’s most direct liason toWashington. Out of a budget of $125,154,159 the University received $40,4500,57from the federal government. (It is alsoCannon’s job to act as the general liasonbetween the administration and ArgonneNational Laboratory — another hundredmillion in federal contracts.)When members of the faculty becomeinterested in a research project theydraw up a prospectus and begin to talkto Cannon’s office about what agency ofthe government might fund it. He is Sup¬posed to know which one.Edward Levi The aspect of a Nixon presidency doesnot alarm Cannon so much as it doessome in the administration (and aroundthe country). He projects a decrease inthe rate of growth rather than actualcutbacks. He points out that the problemwill be in terms of growth vs. needs, andthe needs are expanding.The third vice president is Gilbert Lee(business and finance). He is in chargeof the day to day business operations ofthe University: security, residence hallsand commons (ah ha, the dormitoryfood), staffing of the non professionalareas, the bookstore. ‘‘When I first camehere,” he says, “there were a few areaswhere there were nothing but constantproblems.” The bookstore was one ofthem. A new manager, Harlan Davidson,was apppinted, and some progress hasbegun to be made there. (For example,something like 90 percent of requiredand recommended texts were availablefrom the bookstore this year, which issome kind of record.) A little progresshas also been made in the area of secur¬ity, a problem which every member ofthe community is at least aware of. Theconflicting maze of guard agencies hasbeen simplified; the University is tryingto hire its own professional staff of secur¬ity guards rather than a number ofmoonlighting Chicago cops.But what must be kept in mind in talk¬ing about the administration or for thatmatter anything at the University of Chi¬cago, is the faculty. It is the faculty thatsends the programs to Bill Cannon tofind grants for. It is the faculty that de¬termines the needs which the privatefund drives are based on. It is the activi¬ties of the faculty which the public infor¬mation office reports. It is the work ofthe faculty its research which is thechief business of the University. It is thefaculty senate (tenured professors andassistant professors who have been herefor three years) which meets every yearto elect the council of the senate whichmeets every month and elects the com¬mittee of the council.It is the faculty, the professors, thedepartments, the collegiate divisions andtheir masters, the University divisionsand their deans, the senate, the council,,,the committee of the council which de¬termine the policy of the University. Andthe administration exists for the mostpart to serve the faculty; the board oftrustees exists for the most part to sup¬port the faculty. And not the other wayaround.November 15, 1968 New Administration 5An Evening of SMusic by faculty & Studentsin Honor of President Edward Jdirscb LeviAn Inauguration EventSATURDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 16, 1968AT 8:00MANDEL HALL1135 E. 57th StreetThe Motet Choir of the Collegium MusicumHoward Brown, DirectorEasley Blackwood, Pianist / Jan Herlinger, Flutist / John Cobb, PianistThe University ChorusBenjamin Hadley, DirectorThe University Symphony OrchestraGene Narmour, ConductorAdmission is without Charge / Tickets at Information Desk and Reynolds ClubNew Administration November 15, 1968/ want the University to continue onthe path which it began on 75 years ago,to be a great intellectual institution. Thatmeans that it is primarily a research in¬stitution—a research institution that hascommitted itself wholeheartedly to ateaching program of the highest stand¬ards.(Edward Levi, Maroon interview,Sept. 29, 1967.)The overriding importance of the fac¬ulty at this University is not simply aproduct of its sense of academic prior¬ities. In the fifties when the Universityrealized that the deteriorating neighbor¬hood was tearing it apart, it decided thata good faculty could attract students andmoney. But without it, the Universitywould collapse. At all costs it must holdon to its faculty. Maintenance of build¬ings was cut to a bare minimum. Con¬struction ceased. Somehow, a substantialnumber of professors stayed through theperiod. Levi was one of them, and wasprobably as instrumental as any of themin persuading his fellows to stay as well.He made the law school into one of thefinest in the country. Beadle says thatbuilding the faculty was his first prior¬ity, and, he says that one of the impor¬tant things that happened early in hisadministration was appointing Levi asprovost.As a result of all this, the veterans ofthe period are very proud that theystayed, that the University was saved,that Hyde Park did not become a part ofthe ghetto. They tend to be slightlycomtemptuous of students in the sensethat they can’t see how students can be¬come as attached to the University overfour years as they have over two dec¬ades.Edward Levi is known to be a verypersuasive man. (He is seen to be re¬sponsible for the attraction of Daly, Lee.Wilson, Cannon, the lieutenants in theteam to work on the financial problemsof the University). He has pulled togeth¬er an excellent faculty. Bat the peoplehe has not persuaded so far are the stu¬dents. Freshmen, coming from highschool, are always somewhat startled todiscover that the University is not runfor them. But in most areas of the Uni¬versity, students have no voice. Theparts of the administration whichdirectly affect students are generally theworst run (such as RH&C). Interestinglyenough, there are vice presidents for thefaculty and for fund raising, but there isno vice president for student affairs. Thedean of students, Charles O’Connell, isdrastically overworked — he says therereally should be two deans of students.Many students regard Levi as cold andinacessible. Levi defends himself say-sing of a course he likes students, “Iwouldn’t be a teacher if I didn’t. He istrying to set up a advisory group drawnfrom the elected student councils in thevarious divisions and departments (hedeclines to go through Student Govern¬ment because he is afraid of the politicalhay the student politicians might makeof the confidences he would give them.)Much of the gap between Levi and stu¬dents is a matter of communications. Heis working to improve them; and heseems to be getting closer to what stu¬dents want in the way of running theirUniversity.The University stands, as a gray emi¬nence, on the edge of turbulent future.Levi and his administration are ablemen; but the problems can overwhelmthem and the rest of his very easily (Co¬lumbia is only too close an example). Atleast the administration has an acuteawareness of the problems; the next fewmonths will see what directions theytake in solving them. Charles O’ConnellWilliam CannonNovember 15, 1968tool ,4>1 jVUulJtv^i New Administration 7Here’s the scene. You want to go somewhereYou want to fly. So you make it to the airportand try to get on a plane. Maybe you do,maybe you don’t. Get out of the bag.Allegheny gives you advance reservations Jto get you where you’re going, when you Ijwant to go. All this at up to one-third off *the ticket price when you purchase our iYoung Adult Card. You can fly whenyou want to. Even holidays.Who wants to wait? $§8LGoing someplace soon? If you'reunder 22, stop by anyAllegheny ticket counter,purchase your Young AdultCard and save up to331/3%. From there, Jf »y||Hjthe sky is yours. jmYoung adults in a hurry flyUllBHCHYFabyarEmbroidered Trim(head bands, book straps, Nehru shirts etc...)BurlapAfrican & Asian Fabrics(dashikis, wall hangings etc...)Mon. I0-6 Thurs. I0-8Tues. I0-6 Fri. I0-8Wed. I0-6 Sat. I0-6Sun. I - 55225 So. Harper 363-2349Entrance beside Chances R Autumn 1968 MONDAY LECTURESLaw Auditorium • 1121 East 60th • 8 P.M.Nov. 18 - FRITZ MACHLUP (Princeton)Some Aspects of Academic FreedomNov. 25- VALENTINE TELEGDI (Univ. Chicago)Through the looking Glass: MirroringSpace CHARGE and TimeADMISSION Series tickets S7.50 by mail only (call FI 6*8300). A limitednumber of complimentary tickets for U. of C. students and faculty areavailable at Central Info. Desk in Adm. Bldg., or at University Extension,Room 121, Center for Continuing Education (Ex. 3137).4 ^ ive/come /kur 4Amr eznr/1552 €. 3iflrDklJ pj 2-9255appointmentsSKI ASPENSee our Classified Koga Gift ShopDistinctive Gift Items F romThe Orientand Around The World1462 E. 53rd St.MU 4-6856 EYE EXAMINATIONSFASHION EYEWEARHY 3-4212 CONTACT LENSESItalian Sc AmericanDishes Sandwiches DR. KURT ROSENBAUMOptometristDelivery Service 53 Kimbark PlazaOPEN 7 DAYS 1200 East 53rd StreetCarry-Outs HYde Park 3-83721459 E. Hyde Park Blvd TAKCAW-YM*CHINESE-AMERICANRESTAURANTSpecializing inCANTONESE ANDAMERICAN DISHESOPEN DAILYI I A.M. TO 9 P.M.SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS12 TO 9 P.M.Orders to take out^l^astjS3£^1U4^£££Theses, term papersTyped, edited to specifications.Also tables and charts.11 yrs. exp.MANUSCRIPTS UNLIMITED664-5858866 No. Wabash Ave. "Worship the Lord in the Beauty of Holiness"-Psalm 29:2South Shore Bible Church, 7159 S. Cornell Ave.,invites you to Sunday School, 9:45 A.M.; Sundayworship, 11:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M.; WednesdayPrayer Service, 7:15 P.M. INTERNATIONAL HOUSEGIFT SHOP1414 E. 59th STREETGIFTS FROMAROUND THE WORLDTobaccos-Candies-StationeryNewspapers-MagazinesCosmeticsOpen M-F Noon-6:45New Administration November 15, 1968 3 tie Squire ShopSecond and WashingtonHinsdale, IllinoisCollegiately" Correct...For Fall 1968: Sero offers a choice of twoof America’s most celebrated tampus collarmodels — the Purist® button-down and thenew, distinctive Bristol. Deftly tailored —with trimly tapered body lines — in a hostof handsome solid colourings, stripings andchecks, many exclusive with Sero. Bothmodels come in fine-combed 100% cotton ordurable press.AVAILABLE ATTHE GREYJOURNAL CITYNumber Eight November 15,1968Chicago Surrealists Redefine GenreTHERE IS CURRENTLY a surrealist exhi¬bition at the Gallery Bugs Bunny (524 westEugenie, Chicago 60614; just of Mohawk &Ogden), showing works by Lester Dore,Schlechter Duvall, Robert Green, EricMatheson, Franklin and Penelope Rose-mont. Open daily (except Tuesday &Thursday) 3-9 p.m. Donation 50 cents.Franklin Rosemont is a spokesman forthe surrealist movement in the UnitedStates, editor of the broadsheet “SurrealistInsurrection”, a contributor to surrealistpublications in France and Holland, authorof the Morning of a Machine gun.The interviewer is Ben Covington of theLondon publication, Heatwave.It is obvious that the conception of sur¬realism you affirm fails to correspond withthe popular usage of the word as a syno¬nym for the bizarre and the irrational.Perhaps then we should begin by asking,what is surrealism?It is always essential to speak of theaims of surrealism rather than its defini¬tion, because surrealism is a living, dy¬namic, revolutionary movement and not animmobile body of changeless dogma. It isthe aim of surrealism to reduce and finallyto dispose completely of the abusive con¬tradictions that exist between dream andwaking life, the unconscious and the con¬scious, reason and madness, etc., to enableman to live in permanent lvrical exaltationand to realize fully the splendid potentia¬lities of life. “Poetry must be made byall,” wrote Lautreamont, “Not by one.”Surrealism intends to make the domain ofthe marvelous the acknowledged commonproperty of all. On the practical plane itrecognizes and affirms the crucial, unpar¬alleled significance of authentic works ofthe imagination, while pitilessly criticisingthe reactionary concept of “talent” andother myths of bourgeois culture whichsupport only the reification and alienationof man. Despite the ignoble pretensions ofcertain critics, surrealism is not an artisticor literary school; on the contrary, it isfirst and foremost a revolutionary move¬ment which aims at nothing less than thetotal subversion and transformation ofwestern civilization and the total liberationof man,You seem to imply a strong political atti¬tude...Surrealism from its inception in 1924 hasalways been violently aggressive, fightingagainst every form of economic, political,social and cultural oppression. Humanemancipation remains for us, as AndreBreton wrote in 1928, “the only causeworth serving.” Surrealism stands forwhat Fourier, Marx and Engels, Lenin,Rosa Luxemburg, Trotsky and Che Guev¬ara stood for. In The Political Position ofSurrealism and in the Second Manifesto,both of which will appear in English trans¬lation this January in an edition of TheSurrealist Manifestoes, Breton has ex¬plained the political development of sur¬realism from its vaguely anarchistic begin¬nings to its unreserved adherence to dia¬lectical materialism and revolutionarycommunism. Marxism-Leninism remainsan essential constituent element of the sur¬realist perspective; it goes without sayingthat we absolutely reject the sterile per¬versions of this theory offered by the bu¬reaucracies of the Soviet Union and MaoistChina, which are only pathetic justifica¬tions for oppression. The greatest hope, from the point of view of surrealism today,is indicated by the Cuban Revolution, theguerrilla movements against imperialism,the growing radical student movementthroughout the world; and, more particu¬larly in the U.S., by the more militant sec¬tions of the Black Power movement, whoare beginning to raise the battle-cry of rev¬olutionary socialism; the radical studentmovement, the most advanced sections ofwhich are also moving toward a specific¬ally socialist position; the growth of wild¬cat strikes and workers’ use of militantsabotage; and such “specialized” organ¬izing efforts as Vietnam Gl, published byveterans of the Vietnam war; the newmovement of American Indians, etc.Surrealism brings to these variously iso¬lated revolutionary tendencies its own par¬ticular resources and energies. Unfortu¬nately, much confusion regarding our prin¬ciples and aims has been spread not onlyby bourgeois critics and journalists, butalso by stalinist and revisionist hacks. Wemust combat this confusion with the in¬vincible weapon of revolutionary clarity, todemonstrate the essential common groundand unity of surrealism and revolutionarymarxism. Iwould like to quote, in this re¬gard, a few words of Anatole Lunacharsky,the Soviet Commissar of Education priorto the consolidation of stalinism: “The Sur¬realists,” he wrote, “have rightly under¬stood that the task of all revolutionary in¬tellectuals under a capitalist regime is todenounce bourgeois values. Their effortsdeserve to be encouraged.”We hope to multiply our collaborationswith serious Marxists and to contribute ev¬ erything we can to the building of a trulyrevolutionary movement in this country.Today, as ever, we place ourselves unre¬servedly “in the service of the revolution.”in the leaflet titled “Protest” you attackthe “Dada, Surrealism & Their Heritage”Exhibition, presently at the Art Institute,describing it as a “reprehensible fraud.”Would you care to elaborate on this?The “Dada, Surrealism & Their Heri¬tage” exhibition was originally organizedlast spring at the Mausoleum of ModemArt in New York, under the direction ofmore nor less than an elaborate effort tobury surrealism in the insignificant pas¬tures of “pure art;” to embalm its pastand deny its presence with heavy doses ofpseudo-critical formaldehyde consisting ofthe most abject academic platitudes,journalistic distortions and outright lies. Aswe stated in our leaflet, “Only surrealistsare capable of organizing a surrealist exhi¬bition.” Prof. Rubin’s cretinising didactic¬ism and geneeral stupidity place him inthe category of the least qualified to speakof surrealism or anything else of revolu¬tionary importance. In short, his exhibitionmeets none of the requorements of surreal¬ism.How does the Surrealist Exhibition at theGallery Bugs Bunny meet these require¬ments?We organized this Surrealist Exhibition,as our leaflet stated, as “an act of retali¬ation and correction...testifying to the au¬thentic living presence of surrealism to¬day,” a sort of guerrilla attack against theRubin masquerade at the Art Institute. Itwas organized very hurriedly - - - almost overnight - - - and publicized (with leafletsand a poster) according to our limited fi¬nancial resources. In spite of such mate¬rial disadvantages, however, this exhibi¬tion has already been a great success. Itconstitutes nothing less than a revelationof continuity and vitality which not onlyexposes the Rubin school of falsification,but also demonstrates once again, andvery clearly, the true, subversive, opposi¬tional character of surrealism.The exhibition comprises an automaticsequence of lyrical negations, in which theidols and props of imperialist culture aresystematically destroyed. Surrealism is in¬troducing into the desert of American cul¬ture a long-absent element: REVOLT. Themeticulous graphic world of Lester Dore isborne of a desperate leap into the abyss ofmelanotic humor from which he retrieveshermetic, darkly brooding, insolent souve¬nirs. It is clear that his attitude implies anunalterable disregard for the oppressivecontrivances of the “Experiments in Artand Technology” tendency. This is becausewhen surrealists speak of “art,” we meanart in the sense that a Kwakiutl totem poleor a New Ireland fetish or a Krazy Katcartoon is art.Thus, against the bureaucratic geometry“top” art and the concentration camps ofminimal art, we shall defend the magicintervention of Schlechter Duvall, the non-euclidean phoenix, armed to the teeth withthe marvelous and ready for anything.Against Andy Warhol's false icons of im¬potent servility, we employ the infernalmachines of Robert Green, which bristlewith volcanic rage - - - and a cruel laugh¬ter - against the inhibitions of commodityreality.Eric Matheson explores the inner spacewhich unites geology with microbiology; hesets fires to the sterile constructions of in¬fantile McLuhanism and senile psychedelicmysticism, while simultaneously buildingprehensile plastic-psilocybine bridges acrossthe immense and fertile river of poeticexhilaration.The watercolors and drawings of Pene¬lope Rosemont plunge deep into the sea ofchance, where luminous flashes of alchem¬ic splendour whisk by like owls in the articnight. Her “found films” represent theprofound negation of “artistic” photo¬graphy, and challengingly reopen the pho¬tographic field, once again, to genuine dis¬covery.Of my own drawings and other works Ishall say only that I proceed from the in¬exhaustible “magnetic fields” of automat¬ism, which I explore with the sort of im¬passioned laziness of walking through for¬ests, or peering into a kaleidoscope.It is also worth mentioning that, con¬trary to Prof. Rubin’s ridiculous assertionthat “since 1950, there has been no surreal¬ist painting,” all the works in our exhibi¬tion date from the last two or three years.I must emphasize, however, that the Sur¬realist Exhibition at the Gallery Bugs Bun¬ny should be seen essentially as a prefaceto a later, larger International SurrealistExhibition, which will bring together re¬cent works from surrealists all over theworld, and thus present a wider, more ex¬tensive view of the current preoccupations,activity and orientation of the surrealistContinued on Page Twor.ciJtiiri I’MbA YASurrealistsmovement. We are already planning suchan exhibition to take place in Chicagosometime next year, with the close collabo¬ration of the surrealist group in Paris, oursurrealist frients in Argentina,. Brazil,Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Mexico, the Bureauof Surrealist Research in Amsterdam, etc.I think your references to surrealisma living movement will come as a surpriseto most people in this country. Most criticsseem to agree that surrealism is dead, thatit disintegrated as an organized movementduring the Second world war.The alleged “disintegration” of the sur¬realist movement is simply and totallyfalse, a purely reactionary ideologicalmyth designed to distort a true conceptionof history and thus to confuse the pub¬lic. Attempts to bury surrealism, in anycase, are certainly not new. Breton ob¬served in 1947 that such obituaries had ap¬peared almost weekly since the estab¬lishment of the surrealist group in 1924!The post-war development of surrealismis, regrettably, practically unknown in theEnglish-speaking world. To cite only a fewhighlights, we may mention first the splen¬did Ode to Charles Fourier by Andre Bre¬ton, which appeared in 1947; his study ofMagic Art, written in collaboration withGerard Legrand, was published in 1957. Ofparticular theoretical interest is the re¬markable edition of Lautreamont’s Poesiesannotated by Gerard Legrand and GeorgesGoldfayn, published in 1960 by Le TerrainVague.We must also mention the surrealist pe¬riodicals Neon (1948-9);Medium (1952-5); Le Surrealisme, Meme (1956-9; BIEF 1958-60); La Breche (1961-5);and the presentL’Archibras, the first issue of which ap¬peared in early summer 1967. A single is-use of Free Unions was published in 1946.In Milan appeared several issues of FrontUnique in the late 1950’s and early 60’s.The Bureau of Surrealist Research in Am¬sterdam has published several issues of itsBrumes Blondes; the first issue of a newseries has jsut been published. The firstissue of A Phala, journal of surrealists inSoa Paolo, was published last winter. Theappearance of Aura, a theoritical journalof the group in Prague, has been delayedby the Soviet invasion and its brutal politi¬cal consequences. Several issues of a mim¬eographed bulletin, Styx, have been pub¬lished by the group in Brno.It is necessary also to mention the majorSurrealist Exhibitions: Prague 1947; Paris1947, 1959 and 1965; New York 1960; Milan1961; Amsterdam, Bratislava and SaoPaolo 1967; and the recent Czechoslovakianexhibition which stayed a month each inPrague, Brno and Bratislava.On the poetic plane a word must be saidabout the fertile and disquieting voices ofGuy Cabanel, Malcolm de Chazal. Jean-Pierre Duprey, George Gronier, ClementMagloire-Saint-Aude, Joyce Mansour andJean-Claude Silbermann in the French lan¬guage. Contemporary surrealist poetry inEnglish may be found in our various publi¬cations. I do not read Spanish, Czech, Por¬tuguese, Dutch or Japanese and too littleof the poetic production of surrealists writ¬ing in these languages has been translatedfor me to remark on their work.In the plastic arts, recent years haveseen the marvelous contributions of JeanBenoit, Leonora Carrington, Jorge Com¬ acho, Adrien Dax, Alberto Giroriella, E.F.Granell, Jiri Havlicek, Konrad Klapheck,Josef Kremlacek, Robert Lagarde, WifredoLam, Sergio Lima, Roberto Matta, J.H.Moesman, Pierre Molinier, Mimi Parent,Jean-Claude Silbermann, Max-WaiterSvanberg, Jean Terossian and Toyen — avery brief enumeration which nonethelessincludes representatives of no less than tencountries.Of great importance are the theoreticaland critical writings of Philippe Audoin,Robert Benayoun, Vincent Bounoure, AlainJoubert, Annie Le Brun. Gerard Legrand,Jehan Mayoux, Jose Pierre, Jean Schusterand Claude Tarnaud in France; Her deVries and Laurens Vancrevel in Amster¬dam, etc.Lastly we must mention some surrealistpolitical interventions: the journal 14 Juil-let, established by Jean Schuster; the cel-bra ted “Manifesto of the 121,” supportinginsubordination in the Algerian war; theestablishment of a group in Europe to as¬sist U.S. army deserters; the enthusiasticsupport of the Cuban Revolution; surrealistparticipation in the Cultural Congress ofHavana last year; the recent “Open Letterto the Communist Party of Cuba,” protest¬ing Castro’s support for the Soviet invasionof Czechoslovakia; and two special issuesof L’Archibras, journal of the Paris group:No. 4, devoted to surrealist manifestationsduring the “May Days” this year, and No.5, entirely devoted to texts regarding sur¬realist activity in Czechoslovakia and theSoviet invasion. This last contains “ThePlatform of Prague,” a succinct theo¬retical declaration collaboratively writtenby Czech and French surrealists, in whichthe current perspective of surrealism is beautifully, lucidly revealed, and which weshall soon issue in an English translation.For those interested in pursuing furtherthe historical development of surrealismsince World War II, I recommend the bookVingt Ans de Surrealisme: 1939-59 (editionsDenoel) by Jean-Louis Bedouin, an activeparticipant in this history.Most Americans think of Salvador Dalias the “surrealist par excellence.” Whatdo you think of him?Dali adhered to the surrealist movementin 1929, and for several years participatedactively in all its manifestations. It is inthis period that he created his indisputablygreatest works: “The Lugubrious Game,”“Illumined Pleasures,” “Six Apparitions ofLenin on a Piano,” “The Accomodations ofDesire,” etc., as well as certain theoreticaland imaginative texts: La Femme Visible,The Conquest of the Irrational and hisparanoiac-critical interpretation of “TheAngelus” of Millet which, although writtenin the 1930’s was just published in a com¬plete edition a few years ago. In the late1930’s Dali’s political position became in¬creasingly dubious and suspect; in 1938,declaring himself an admirer of Hitler andFranco, he was expelled from the surreal¬ist group. Since then he has devoted him¬self to the most degrading careerism, asort of excremental “classicism” whichcommercially exploits the rotted myths ofCatholicism; in any case, he has had noconnection whatever with surrealism since1938.Surrealism is often thought of as an ex¬clusively “French” movement, yet youhave mentioned surrealist groups and oractivity in Czechoslovakia, Holland, Cuba,even Japan, and other countries. Do youContinued on Page SixThe Persecution andAssassination ofJean-PaulMARAT As Performed by the inmatesof the Asylum of Charenton under theDirection of the Marquis deSADEWeds. Nov. 20, Cobb Hall, 7 & 9 P.M., $1 (50c with series ticket), CEF REYNOLDS CLUB Alten KossDR. AARON ZIMBLERBARBER SHOP Optometrist5706South University Ave. eye examinationsOnly shop on campus contact lensesin the6 Barbers New Hyde ParkShopping CenterHours 8-5 Mon. thru Fri.Appts. if desiredExt.3573 1510 E. 55th St.DO 3-7644Opens Wed Nov. 20-4 days onlyTHE WHITE DEVILa play c by John Websterdirected by T.C. G FoxREYNOLDS CLUB THEATRE 8 pmTickets $2.00/$1.50 Reynolds Club DeskThe Grey City Journal eon* ci jyc -November 15, 1968 “...there is a temptation to compare JONI MITCHELL to JUDY COLLINSand JOAN BAEZ, and it must be a comparison weighted in Miss Mitchell'sfavor." - The Hollywood ReporterJONI MITCHELLIN CONCERT AT MANDEL HALLMONDAY, NOV. 18, 8:30 P.M.JONI performs all the hits she has written and recorded including:“BOTH SIDES NOW” both also recorded“MICHAEL FROM MOUNTAINS” by Judy Coll ns“CLOUDS” and “CHELSEA MORNING” - also recorded byDave Van Ronk“THE CIRCLE GAME” ■ also recorded by Ian and SylviaListen to her album on Reprise (No. 6293) two or three times andyou'll want tickets for the best concert of the year.TICKETS at Mandel Hall Box Office, 11 A.M. to 2 P.M. today throughMonday and at the door. Reserved seats: $3.00, unreservedseats $2.50 and $2.00.A REVITALIZATION PRESENTATIONGhetto Schools: A Nightmare For ChildrenONE NIGHT, A SHORT WHILE AFTER I BEGANTEACHING, I had a dream. I was Mr. K in Orson Wells’movie version of Kafka’s The Trial. I was in a tremen¬dous room filled with thousands of desks. Behind eachdesk was a child, and all were jumping up and runningaround, throwing things at each other, and constantlyfighting. I ran from desk to desk trying to keep thechildren in their seats, but behind my back they justcontinued their mischief. After a long period of freneticactivity, I leaned in exhaustion against a door andfound myself in a room where children were beingwhipped by big sweating men. I tried to leave, but themen grabbed me. They forced a whip into my hands.I held it in amazement, silently and looked at a child.At first he showed no expression, but then he said, “Beatme,” and began to laugh hysterically.Except for its dreamlike aspect, this is a fairly accu¬rate description of what it is like to teach in a slumghetto school in Chicago. The description has four sides:the administration, the teachers, the pupils, and the con¬ditions.I have noticed two broad characteristics of the Boardof Education, its bueaucracy and the low quality of itsendeavors. In illustration of the latter: About five or sixhundred Provisional (uncertified) teachers attended aspecial summer institute to prepare them for teaching.On the first day of the four week session, we were in¬formed that we could either take it for no credit, or forsix credits, as we preferred. Upon inquiring what thedifference in program was between the two, we weretold that the credit course involved extra work. In fact,there was no difference whatsoever, except that to getthe credits it was necessary to pay eighty-one dollars toChicago State College. The quality of the Institute was aparody of itself. The level of instruction was, withoutexaggeration, on an elementary school level. Even hadthe subjects been well taught, they bore no relation tothe real ones in the schools.When I started work I quickly found out what itmeans to be low man on the totem pole. I was given oneof the most undesireable classes in the school, and waslater removed from that class without notice or causegiven. It became immediately clear that Provisionalteachers are expected to serve as trouble shooters in theworst classes, and yet it is they who are least equippedto do this.I have visited the Board of Education several times,and always the experience is the same. “Will you take aseat, please?” so the machinery can grind behind yourback: and then, “I’m sorry, you’ll have to go up toroom..The Board of Ed is a big bureaucracy, andlike all burearcracies it is extremely inefficient andmindless. This is apparent, not only in direct contact, butin all indirect dealings, such as getting supplies, films,etc. It requires from a few months, in the case of smallsupplies, to a year or longer, with larger items, to movethe desired equipment into a local school.More important than the Board of Ed in the day-to-day existence of the teacher is the school administration,most importantly the principal. The primary function ofthe principal is to preserve The System. The principalprovides a liaison between the Board of Ed and theteachers to conform (“That is not the way we do thingsthis operates it is necessary to describe The System. Itconsists of two parts, the content of education and theimplementation of the content. Education involves thedevelopment of specified skills in several disciplines andthe inculcation of certain character traits, such as or¬derliness, repressive self-discipline, and suppression ofemotional reactions, as well as the more vague con¬ception of “good citizenship.” How this is accomplished,and what its effects are will be discussed later.The principal maintains The System by pressure onteachers to conform (That is not the way we do thingshere.”), and, when necessary, by outright manipulation.An example is my own case: As everyone in the schoolknew, my class was very unconventional, not only be¬cause it was noisy, but because the children seemed tobe playing games much of the time. (This was the case,partly because of my lack of experience, and partly be¬cause I desired it that way.) After four weeks, a moreacceptable teacher took the class. Now the children aregenerally very quiet, and no games are played. No one,however, has even hinted that the children are learningmore in the new situation than they did in the old; inpoint of fact, they are not. But learning was never theissue. The principal was concerned about the noise and•he seeming lack of business; in other words, quiet andbusiness (defined as silent seatwork) are virtues andends in themselves. Thus the school does not only teach•he three R’s, but quipt and “business;” thus the princi¬pal maintains The System. The secondary function of the principal is to super¬vise the staff and keep the school in working condition.Since, however, there are seventy teachers and two thou¬sand pupils in my school, it is impossible for one personto do the job adequately. Unfortunately the Board of Eddoes not recognize this, so that those principals who careto keep their jobs must appear to be keeping everythingunder control. Thus, much time is spent “looking good”,rather than doing good. To make things worse, becausethe principal is identified professionally with The Sys¬tem, on which his job depends, and because, to all ap¬pearances, at least one principal identifies himself per¬sonally with it, not only is no basic change demanded oreven suggested. So the school drags along, without coor¬dination or direction. No one ever bothered to find outwhether my children were actually learning anything,and, to tell the truth, I don’t think anyone cared.The vice principal is basically a smaller edition ofthe principal, with the added functions of handling mostof the severe discipline cases and controlling the flow ofsupplies to the teachers. Since the vice principal is nottied down to one room, he is a sort of floating System-enforcer. This mostly involves yelling: yelling at chil¬dren brought down to the office, yelling at them in thehalls for such things as talking, walking out of line, anddrinking water, yelling at any symptoms of life, andcertainly at anything that looks like fun. The attitudeseems to be: “School is a place to work, not to have fun(note the dichotomy). You better sit still, shut yourmouth, and don’t move without permission, so you canbe free and creative. School is a terrible place, andyou’d better like it.”The function of the Adjustment Office, which in¬cludes a Master Teacher and a few Adjustment Teach¬ers, is to determine the classroom placement of all pu¬pils, to diagnose the learning difficulties of “problem”children, and to assist the teachers in their teaching ofreading. Unfortunately, the Adjustment personnel areunable to do their job well because they have lost touchwith the reality of the classroom. They have becausefirstly they rely completely on test scores when diagnos¬ing a problem, and secondly because, like so many oth¬ers, they are inured to the inadequacy and squalor ofThe System and the school. Because the Master Teacheris supposed to aid each of the seventy teachers, his effec¬tiveness is nil. When asked if I needed any help, I saidthat I had no reading materials, to which he replied thathe would give me what I needed. He eventually taughtmy class for a half hour and gave me a list of 175 mostused words. The Adjustment office “diagnoses” prob¬lems by administering tests and referring the results tothe classroom teacher. Thus, the Adjustment office ren¬ders no real service to the teachers. But it too justifiesits existence to the Board of Ed by setting up appear¬ances, rather than attempting to get more staff so that itcould really do something.In addition to all these, the school administrationalso includes the social worker, truant officer, commu¬nity representative, nurse, and policeman. Although thesocial worker and community representative are alwaysaround, I have never had any contact with them, nor hasanyone else whom I know, so I do not know how theyfunction. The truant officer’s job is obvious; he workshard. The nurse is in school two days a week. When sheis but, there is no first aid, other than a bottle of per¬oxide, cotton, and some bandages. When she is in, thereis little more that she can do because there is no bed,not even a quiet place to sit, not even a comfortablechair to sit on. The policeman’s job is to police the hallsall day, the grounds during recess, and fire drills. Theprincipal incidentally informed us that our bell systemwas not working properly, and in the event of a fire, thealarm might or might not be heard at the fire station).There are three salient features that characterize mostteachers, the first being their phony professionalism.Teachers stoop to many things, from shutting up theirchildren behind text books to beating or even torturingthem; but let it be even suggested that teachers upholdless than the highest standards of pedagogy, and theybreathe fire. Also, many teachers (mostly women) spenda good deal of their time gossiping about each other. Buta teacher will never, ever publicly criticize anotherteacher; rather, he will run down to the principal tocomplain.Most teachers find teaching a job, not a profession,that is, they do not enjoy their work. For this reason,and also because of their training, they are without ener¬gy and creativity. They do not usually use their ownlesson material, for instance, by using an overhead proj¬ector. It also apparently never occurs to them to teachby unorthodox means, such as with games. Instead, theyrely on textbooks, workbooks, occasional ditted sheets,November 15, 1968<60 ,ci isdmovoZ once in a while a filmstrip, etc., thereby losing touchwith the interests and experiences of the children.Hence, from the start the pupils are disinterested andhate school, because there is no relationship between lifein the ghetto and the artificial Dick, Jane, and Sallyatmosphere of the school. So they hate their teacher fornot being interesting (among other reasons), and hehates them for being lazy (among other reasons). Whythen do teachers continue? Inertia, salary, prestige? — Ido not know. A more pertinent question is, how do theycontinue? One answer I got was quite simple: “I cry alot.”Because teachers are inexcited by their work andunsophisticated in their training, they reinforce The Sys¬tem as it is dictated by the teachers’ colleges and theBoard of Ed, via the principals. Hence, they are regres¬sive in their instruction and repressive in their dis¬cipline. The extent to which many teachers go to forcetheir children to conform may seem unbelievable tosomeone who has never taught in a school. Pupils arenever, to my knowledge, punished for lack of achieve¬ment; but they are constantly punished for a breach ofthe Code of Discipline. These infringements may beslight or great, but in all cases the punishment is heavy.I have seen children beaten about the torso with a heavyyardstick for taking a drink of water at the wrong timeor without permission. I have seen children beaten forstanding on the wrong color tile in the hall, while waitingin line. I have seen children beaten for talking or leavingtheir seats without permission. And I do not mean tap¬ped; I mean beaten, even though this is against the lawin Chicago. Another, perhaps more destructive type ofpunishment, is the verbal assault: “Boy, what’s the mat¬ter with you, are you stupid”—or some variation.Worse than these is the third type of punishment:fortune. Characteristically, this combines public humili¬ation with physical pain. I have seen two types: One isto stand the child in front of the class and smack hisoutstretched hand with a wooden paddle. When the childinstinctively pulls his arm in, he is told to hold it out. Ifhe refuses, he is hit elsewhere until he complies, and thenhis hand is smacked again. W hen he starts to cry, theteacher then adds a verbal attack: “Why did you dothat?” (Smack.) “Are you going to do that again?”(Smack.) “Huh!” (Smack.) Etc. When the child is com¬pletely humiliated and in great pain, with tears stream¬ing down his face, he is made to stand in a corner andface a blank wall for as long as two or three hours.Because he talked when he should have been quiet. Theother torture I have witnesses is a bit more subtle: Itconsists of standing a child in front of the class andmaking him hold his hands straight up over his headwithout allowing him to move. This is guaranteed tobreak any child.The inevitable result of this teacher-pupil relation¬ship, based on fear and hate (on both sides), is that aftera few years of school all pupils are either broken, i.e.are programmed with The System, or are “disciplineproblems.” Very many have elements of both, becausethe programming is less than one hundred percent effec¬tive. Even those children who fight The System, how¬ever, are effectively destroyed by it, because they aredriven to anti-social, almost pathological behavior.It is clear at this point that a system of educationaltheory and application, massive in size, repressive innature, and above all, unchangeable bears down on thepupil with, as shall now be shown, disastrous effect.The class that I was given to teach consisted of thetwenty six PZ—IR fourth graders. PZ—IR refers to twointermediate years between third and fourth grade forthose with severe learning disabilities. Each of the chil¬dren was beset by a host of problems that prevented orinhibited his ability to learn. Following are six exam¬ples:Number One is completely anti-social in his behav¬ior. He is incapable of playing, either alone or with oth¬ers; his only means of expression is fighting, which hedoes constantly. As one of nine children, he expressesgreat desire for special attention. He is completelyunable to function in a classroom situation. Although hecan add and subtract by rote, he does not know thealphabet or the sounds of the letters.Number Two is hypertense; he cannot sit or standstill or quietly, and he constantly fidgets. His attentionspan is no more than a few minutes, and he has noability to concentrate. In addition, he is uncoordinated.He knows no arithmetic, and, although he knows some ofthe sounds of the letters, his sight vocabulary is no morethan ten words.Number Three is extremely defensive. He will neverContinued on Page FourThe Grey City Journal 3'(UJ vs'tt' *>JYGhetto Schoolsadmit an error, and will even destroy what he has donebefore the teacher can see it. He seems to be quiteintelligent and able to learn, but has been unable tofunction well in school.Number Four is quite similar to Number Two. Hehas no ability to relate bits of information (If A and B.then C; what is C?), and cannot listen, for instancemight not be ablt to answer the question, “A is one, andB is two; what is A?”Number Five has extremely poor eyesight and aspeech defect (but he does not have glasses, and hasnever had speech therapy, which is theoretically avail¬able in the school). In addition, he is very quiet, so heinvariably sits in a corner. For these reasons he appears“slow" whereas he is actually quite bright. All he needsis somebody to teach him, and a chance to apply hislearning.Number Six has been successfully programmed. Heis extremely neat and always heads his paper correctly.He does well in arithmetic and whatever else can beperformed by rote but he has no ability to relate bits ofinformation. For example, although his sight vacabularyis comparatively large, he cannot relate the names ofthe letters to their sounds.It is obvious that these six children are inhibited intheir learning by a variety of problems, some induced bythe school, others by their lives outside. And they are notalone: All my children have these problems, as do un¬doubtedly a good many other children in the school. As ateacher I constantly encountered what appeared to bestupidity, but on closer inspection turned out to be in¬telligence inhibited by some emotional or physical block.Needless to say, this posed serious problems for me, as Iwas trying to determine what my children had learned. Iwill give only two examples of the kind of difficulties Iencountered in this regard:Number Seven had me convinced that he was mental¬ly retarded. He was treated like an imbecile by the otherchildren, e.g. was set up for pranks. He rarely turned inany work, and never of any worth. His coordination ap¬peared below standard. When I spoke to his last teacher,she said that Seven was the dumbest child she had everseen, and that she had not been able to do anything withhim all year except beat him, which she did often. So, Ifelt sorry for Seven, but I, too, was convinced that hewas in the wrong institution. But after I lost my class,and began to tutor this child without the encumbrance ofthe classroom, I discovered to my amazement that hewas not uncoordinated, that he could speak, and could even read better than many others in the class! Whathad he been doing in by class, and others, quietly know¬ing what was going on, but never admitting it? Why didhe keep silent and purposely appear stupid?Number Eight, in contrast to Seven, was alwaysnoisy and boisterous. Obviously emotionally disturbed, healso appeared completely uneducated, possibly stupid.His attention span was very short; he could not remainsitting for more than five minutes, and he always turnedin very inferior work, if any. Always a menace to theclassroom order, I never regarded him as anything but aRoyal Pain — until my fourth week of teaching. Everyday during arithmetic, Eight would come up 10 my deskand complain that he could not do the problems, which,it seemed, he certainly could not. One day, however, hecame up to my desk and proceeded to do every one ofthe problems without a single error! If I had not seen it,I would never have belieied it, so convinced was I at his“slowness.” What had he been doing for four weeks, nofive years? Why was he driven to conceal his knowl¬edge and appear stupid? Now it is certainly true that hebrought severe problems from home, but that is not thewhole answer. What kind of an educational system is itthat teaches a child to hide his knowledge under a veil ofstupidity?Under the combined force of The System and its bureau¬cracy, the pressure of an unenlightened semi-profes¬sional staff, and a classroom filled with psychologicalproblems. I began teaching. From the start there was noquestion of a fair fight; I felt like I had been dropped offthe ten meter board with my hands and legs tied.On the first day of school, my classroom containedno desks, no books, no place to hang coats, and no sup¬plies. My entire arsenal of educational weapons includedtwo small bulletin boards, one small blackboard, somechalk, a few pencils,, and paper. In addition, I had noclass list, i.e. I had no way of knowing who was sup¬posed to be in my class and who was not—and that is areal problem on the first day of school. I had no attend¬ance book, no curriculum guides, no lesson plan book, nobell schedule, no information as to what I should teachor do. no advice other than to “get my discipline down,”and above all, in experience. What that class lookedlike, sticks to my brain like napalm: the incessant fight¬ing, often several simultaniously, the constant barrage ofspitballs, children running all over the room and shout¬ing at each other. . . I shall never forget that first day,no, first week.As the second week of school approached, I becamefrantic for supplies; finally, with another teacher, Iraided the stockroom after school, carrying off all Icould hold — mostly construction paper, sign paper, etc.I still had no books, but I managed to corner an over¬head projector (whereas the state pays for textbooks, theFederal government pays for expensive audio-visualequipment), of which I made full use. My classroom was still a madhouse, but I was at wit’s end as to how tocivilize things. In the halls I saw many teachers carryingyardsticks, and I saw them used many times, and wa?often advised to do the same myself, Cu-t I rejected thatapproach to the problem, although I had no other solution.By the third week, the class began to settle a bit.they were still noisy, but began to get used to the routineand the work. Because I had no books, I had to composeall my own lessons. Although this was a constant burden,it provided a good opportunity to attempt to teach fromthe experience of the children. For instance: The firs)social studies topic was Illinois. The Curriculum Guideemphasized such aspects as natural resources and political structure, but I thought that it would be better tostart with people, so I began with the topic “How dopeople of Illinois live?” and asked the children to talkabout occupations their families were engaged in. VY-eventually discussed the post office, police, mechanics,secretaries, various factory workers, and cabdriversThe children became especially excited when I suggestedthat we collect all the stories and make our own readersTwo weeks later I lost my class, and now the childrenread Uncle Funny Bunny.Also in the third week, a curious thing happened. Asubstitute teacher was sent up by the office to ‘quiet”by class, which he did very effectively by beating sev¬eral children. Unfortunately, the children were so upsetI could not teach them anything for the rest of the dayThe next day. the children were worse than before: Ithought I knew why, but was not sure until a few chil¬dren told me they would be quieter if I would beat thenlike the other teacher had done. Imagine: the childrenwere requiring me to beat them. By the end of the dayit became clear that if I did not do so, I would losecontrol of the class. Very dramatically I picked up thestick and brought it down once, and the class instantlybecame quiet. But with that one blow I entered the ranksof the whippers. I shuddered as I recalled my vow toquit before I would hit a child. That night I had thedream described at the beginning of this article.In the fourth week the situation was much the sameMy class was noisy but manageable, but to keep it thatway, I had to hit a few children. Thus, because of pres¬sure from other teachers and my own children, theweapons of discipline had escalated, although the classwas no better than before. On Friday morning. I wastold that I would no longer be teaching that class; Mon¬day morning I began a new job in the school. Later, Idiscovered dozens of brand new books, none of whichwere being used, which no one had seen fit to call to myattention while I was struggling with the class that no¬body wanted.FoodDrinkPeople Opening November 15A Wild Western ComedyIB DEATH AHD LIFE OFThe Pope... the Premier of Russia...a last desperate effort to prevent World War III.Metro Goldwyn Mayer presents a George Englund productionTHE SHOES OFTHE FISHERMANAnthony Quinn Oskar WernerDavid Janssen • Vittorio De SicaLeo McKern • Sir John GielgudBarbara Jefford * Rosemarie Dexter™.,Sir Laurence Olivieru'h>'d4id, John Patrick James Kennaway based c- its. -o*. d> Mow-siwesideeded b, Michael Anderson . produced b> George Englundtfggfr P»o»vr»»n »«dM«lrocolOf ^^MGMTICKETS NOW AT BOX-OFFICE OR BY MAIL!SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCES AND PRICES: Mon. thru Thurs.Eves, at 8:30; Orch. & Mezz., $2.90; Balcony, $2.50. Sun. Eves, at8:00; Orch. & Mezz., $2.90; Balcony, $2.50. Fri., Sat., Hols. 8> Hoi.Eves, at 8:30; Orch. & Mezz., $3.80: Balcony, $2.90. Mats. Wed.,Sat. 8< Sun. at 2:00; Wed. & Sat. Orch. & Mezz., $2.50; Balcony,$1.80> Mats. Sun. & Hols. Orch. & Mezz., $2.90; Balcony, $2.50.Enclose self-addressed stamped envelope with check or moneyorder payable to McVickers Theatre, 25 W. Madison Street,Chicago, Illinois 60601.DUAL MIDWEST PREMIERENOVEMBER 20th 1 cVICKERSA TRANS-BEACON THEATRECOAST TO COAST25 W. MADISON ST. • CHICAGO, ILL. 60601PHONE 782 8230 u 1 Clark[ Ibeatre i■ enjoy ourspecial studentrate;VRC a,a"/ v j T timesfor college studentspresenting i.d. cardsat our box officea • different double feature ”m daily• open 7:30 a.m.-late■ show 3 a.m. ■■ • Sunday film guild ■m • every wed. and fri. isladies day-all gals 50cm little gai-lery for gals *m only ■m • dark parking—1 door ■south■ 4 hrs. 95c after 5 p.m.m • write for your free ■monthly program■ dark & madison fr 2-2843] ICINEMAChicago Ave. at MichiganEBERT SUN-Times****Should win Academy AwardLESNER NEWS“A Treasure"TERRY TRIBUNE“Film is a Smash"MARSTERS AMERICAN"Everyone Should See It"JUDITH CRIST N.B.C.TV TODAY SHOW“I Love This Movie"$ ^^theathMLMonthStudent rate every 5 4 50day but Sat. * |JVNovember 15, 1968 BEINTOLERANTTonight 311 E 23rd Street2 blocks W ot McCormick PlaceTelephone 225-6171Open 11 am to 9 pm/closed SundaysParty facilities to 400Matter! SNEAKY FITCHstarring Jerry Harperwith Win StrackeGoodman Theatre200 S. Cotumhm Dr CE 6 2337DePaul University presents:RAMSEYLEWIS JOSHWHITE JRSat., Nov. 23, 9 P.M.Alumni Hall, 1011 W. BeldenTickets $4 & $3, available at Ticket Central,212 North Michigan.Pierce Tower Cinema presents:T0PKAPIwith Melina MercouriSat., Nov. 16, Cobb Hall, 7:30 & 9:30 one buckV-7i'7V/ .\. \V- 4(r{ • » vv 4,i 4 ., k 4.The Grey City JournalTheaterThe Only Gilbert and Sullivan Wove GotTHE ANNUAL VISIT of the Gilbert and Sullivan OperaCompany of Chicago, which took place last weekend atMandel Hall, momentarily brightens the mid-semestergloom of the Gray City. This “company” is, of course,no such thing; although a talented nucleus of peoplekeeps it going and continues to turn up in performances,its productions are put together virtually from scratchevery year. Rather wild extremes of achievement havebeen and still are seen. But signs of life are none the lessimpressive for being sporadic, all the more so since thework chosen for 1968 is not exactly from the masters’ topdrawer. speaking of Hilarion’s role was everything one couldwish (well, almost everything: please, Mr. Arnett, it’sglahnces” and “lahnces”, etc.). Left to his own deviceshe is a bit of a “stick” on stage but this is nothing whichpurposeful direction can’t help as was shown particular¬ly during the second act of Princess Ida. Ray Lubwaymade a distinctive contribution as King Gama and so, inthe dialogues, did Jerome Loeb as his opponent, KingHildebrand. The part of Arac was divided between the“three hulking brothers”, a good idea, but of the trioonly Alan Swan approached the basso-profundo require¬ments of the music. ticular, is a standout — a pity she wasn’t given a largerpart to sing. In the title role Joyce Russe ascended theheights set by her music with assurance, if not with joy,and delivered the dialogues in suitably regal fashion.Roland Baiiey’s musical direction was praiseworthy— his reading had the positive virtues of shape and(when possible) lively tempo, and that his forces made itthrough to the end with so few serious mistakes shouldcount for something. Costumes and scenery were appro¬priate and nicely executed.One customarily thinks of Princess Ida as dated. Inits externals, I suppose, it is that the notion of awomen’s university excites no wonder today and many ofGilbert’s jokes are pretty feeble. But while the methodsof one-upmanship between the sexes may vary, the gameitself is still very much the same: there are still timeswhen an educated female is likely to be infuriating (Idaobserves at one point that, while men are bound to the Nearly all the ladies held up both sides of their as¬signments very well. Lorene Richardson’s mezzo, in par-- From an objective standpoint, the Gilbert and Sulli¬van Opera Company still offers only a moderate value.But is is our only local G. & S. troupe and it is capableof providing a moderate amount of pleasure.William MurnamePoetical Drama Not Dead Yetnotion that two plus two equals four, a woman knowsperfectly well that the sum will vary with circum¬stances). And, since both sides in this opera manage tomake complete asses of themselves, Gilbert’s anti-femin¬ist bias does not prevent Princess Ida from making itspoint in contemporary terms.Whether a G. & S. production makes any point at all,however, depends on the precision with which the cast isable to convey it. Mere technical facility is not every¬thing — I have seen some pretty stultifying work fromthe D’Oyley-Carte — but it is the failures of ensemblework (perhaps irremediable, given the basis on whichthe company operates) that are the most persistent bar¬riers to enjoyment. The sloppiness with which the chorusexecutes its maneuvers is understandable, hence forgiv¬able — but the basic lack of imagination in the blockingis not. At several points (e.g. the finale of the third act)details which were evidently meant to be seen were ob¬scured by such failures in arrangement; all toofrequently one felt that movement was merely a sourceof variety rather than meaningful interaction on thestage. In general, the blocking and “business” of theprincipals was apt and entertaining (especially when Da¬vid Currie held Hie stage). But on the whole this produc¬tion just sort of got “done” and, blessing though thismay be, a good deal of fun was lost on the way. ONE OF THE ADVANTAGES of University-sponsoredtheater is the opportunity to present new plays by unrec¬ognized playwrights. Last week-end University Theater,under the direction of James O’Reilly, premiered a one-act play by poet Michael Braude, The Game That HasNo Name. After a preliminary half hour of Mr Braude’spoems, read with much gusto by Mr O’Reilly, the curtainwas raised to reveal an odd collection of what the pro¬gram called “vagrants” — a Dalai Lama, John the Bap¬tist, a Boston barber, Rumanian veterinary, French bak¬er, and several others — lolling about on an almost barestage, behind which was a flat depicting a gray cityunder a giant orange sun. During the three scenes of theplay, the characters milled about, discussing those ques¬tions which are usually discussed in plays structuredaround various unconnected characters and a barestage: God, Reality, Reason, Man. In Mr. Braude’s play,however, they discussed thme in verse (“The leaders allare dead/And yet, men are still mislead,” etc.).The talk centered around several problems. Near thebeginning of the play, a policeman comes onstage andlowers a flag to halfmast; from here on out, the charac¬ters, one in particular, worry about the fact that theydon’t know who died. (In the end, it is the most worriedcharacter who dies; perhaps the flag was lowered forhim all alone.) Then there is the problem of religion.Of the principals, David Currie continues to be theoutstanding member of the company. This time he per¬formed the secondary role of Cyril, and that he rivetedattention on this potentially thankless part is by itself aremarkable index of his versatility. No comic opportun¬ity was missed ,yet his performance had a spontaneityand vigor that was not forced or marred by overem¬phasis. A fine Savoyard — and if you doubt me, be sureto catch his performance of anything next year. ErnestArnett, the company’s leading tenor, has a fine, wellschooled voice and a nice subdued sense of humor whichhe turns to advantage at many points. His phrasing and Next week:On the Stepsof the HiltonArtTo Dick Daley With LoveGO!BUT NOT FOR ART’S SAKE.The show at the Richard Feigen gallery is a visualcomment on the mayor in memory of the August de¬bacle. Few of the pieces exhibited measure up to thereputations of the artists, but then Robert Motherwellstated that the importance was in participation. Perhaps,but wouldn’t personally autographed pictures of the art¬ists accomplish the equivalent in meaning?While in terms of the works displayed the show doesn’timpress, neither does it depress nor suppress. The pieceby Alfons Schilling is most in spirit with the chaos whichwas the convention. The optic disorder of three or foursimultaneous images in each of sixteen sections makesactual visual relations impossible. It translates scenes ofyou and I and the National Guard and the Chicago Po¬lice: PSYCHEDELIC VOMIT.William Copley comments with a plump lady revealingher backside. Robert Morris sends a telegram with themessage: Redo the Chicago fire of 1871. Other artistspresent Daley as a target, as head of a pig parade, orwith his head slashed. By use of a mirror, you and I are told that is we who are the victims. Barnett Newman’s“Lace Curtain for Mayor Daley” is barbed wire splashedwith red paint. These kinds of statements do not requireinterpretation nor inspiration for understanding. But bysimple descriptions of their obviousness, they don’t re¬quire viewing either.The best and most subtle piece is Claes Oldenburg’sfireplugs. The forms suggest both anthropomorphic andpigomorphic figures They are squat, burly, irregular,bright-red, repititous, sinister, ludicrous. As typical ofChicago, they are ubiquitous and dogs urinate againstthem.*•' . 4.V ' J-'lWv The other Oldenburg is a sketch for a monument forChicago. It has Daley’s head on a platter. While thereisn’t an apple in his mouth, the meaning is the same.Originally, a one-man Oldenburg show was scheduled forthis month. But because it was postponed until February,Richard Feigen used Richard Daley as a fill-in.NOT FOR ART’S SAKE BUT FOR RICHARDS’...GO!Diane Radycki».».».».*.f. November 15, 1968 There is a character who has a desire to say “amen” alot but can’t figure out why. John the Baptist, completewith a cardboard sign around his neck proclaiming “theend is near” intones the strict churchman’s views and isanswered by a sceptic, named (what else?) John theNon-Baptist. The Dalai Lama tells a few parables, whichI found as hard to follow as the other characters com¬plained they did. One character begs for direction andbelief, humanity is referred to as “Pilgrims who neverfind the shrine”, and a voice from the light booth, pre¬sumably Gods’, informs the unhappy little band thattheir sins are forgiven, and their virtues, too. Indeed,there is even some playing around with Ecclesiastes:“... a time to rant, and a time to frolic/In a worldstricken with the cholic...”After a time, the characters weary of their word-playand decide that the only alternative is to play a game.One of them suggests a sort of hide-and-seek, in whicheverybody hides and nobody seeks (or no one hides andeverybody seeks, I was not sure which). The problemwith this is that no one is left to be “it”, there is no oneto resolve the game ,and so the characters finally returnto words. Nothing solved, however, and at the end of theplay the Boston barber is left, doing what he was doingwhen the play began, counting the leaves of a prop tree.It is difficult to talk about the merits of the play as apiece of drama because nothing dramatic happens in it. *There is very little interaction between the characters;indeed, if it weren’t for their hats and a few attempts atvocal characterization, it would be very difficult to tellthem apart. The play’s interest lies in Mr Braude’s useof verse to dramatize his characters’ longing for formand direction. Their speech is empty, ritual, shaped andneat but void of meaning, a series of precisely-stateddebates in which not only the answers but the questionsremain unresolved. The only two tools for shaping theirreality which the characters possess are words andgames; the games are circular and futile, the wordscannot be trusted (one character prays “Thy will bedone,” only to be asked by another, “Rare, medium, orwell?”). The whole play is really a game with words: thecharacters are supposedly strangers to one another, butthey have met before, to talk riddles before; there iseven one character who is called the Chairman. As intheir game, they are all seeking, but there is no answer,and no one, hidden (except perhaps the guy in the lightbooth). Words, finally, are only another kind of game,one at which Mr Braude is very clever (a characterwished to be reassured, for instance, that “vacuumsdon’t like nature much either”), but I’m not sure thatthis kind of word-play couldn’t be better savored in printthan on a stage.The cast ,in the main, does extremely well with thedifficult task of making conversation in verse. MrO’Reilly, as John the Baptist, and Dewey McDonald, asthe barber, are especially adapt at making their ritual¬ized characters into full human beings instead mouth¬pieces. Rather than underlining the stylized aspects atthe play, the direction was wisely aimed at providingphysically full, lively and very human dimensions whichoffset the framework and dialogue much more success¬fully than a heightening of the ritual would have done.Set and lighting were adequate, especially when one con¬siders the meager possibilities of the Reynolds Clubstage. The production was all of a piece and well done;the play was interesting and verbally, if not dramaticallyeffective, and the whole thing was certainly preferable toyet another inadequate attempt at Shakespeare or Shaw.Mr O’Reilly is to be commended, and urged to bringmore original plays to the UC stage in the future.Anne AshcraftThe Grey City JournalSurrealiststhink that surrealism can take root in theUnited States, where conditions are so dif¬ferent from Europe?The exclusion of surrealism to France ismerely another deception of reactionaryand/or stupid critics. It is true that themovement has been especially active, pro¬ductive and enduring in France, and thatParis has almost always constituted itschief international focus. But to deny orignore the valuable surrealist activity inother European countries, in Latin Amer¬ica, in Egypt and in Japan, is to contributeto the cause of confusion, misunder¬standing and ignorance.Surrealism arose in response to certainhistorical conditions, which are entirelyuniversal. Its development in an organizedform depends on the economic,. politicaland cultural circumstances in each coun¬try. We know that in France the surreal¬ists acknowledge certain precursors, andthat these precursors do not belong to thebourgeois tradition well-known to studentsof “official” French literature, but, on thecontrary, a subversive, revolutionary, al¬most secret tradition: Sade, Fourier, Ner¬val, Borel, Lautreamont, Rimbaud, Huy-smans, Saint-Pol-Rous, Brisset, Jarry,Roussel, Vache. In the United States, thissecret tradition is only now being “dis¬covered.” so to speak. It is one of the ur¬gent tasks of the surrealist movement todiscredit and eventually overthrow the cul¬tural values of imperialism; we are begin¬ning by a relentless criticism of the “offi¬cial” literary and intellectual tradition im¬posed on us by the ruling classes, and byraising into prominence and defending cer¬tain unknown or ignored writers who seemto us particularly significant.All of this will receive extended consid¬eration in our forthcoming publications.For the moment, let it suffice to cite onlyCharles Brockden Brown. Herman Mel¬ville, Benjamin Paul Blood, AmbroseBierce, Charles Fort, Floyd Dell, T-BoneSlim, H.P. Lovecraft and Clark AshtonSmith among writers whose messageseems to be directed specifically towardus. I must also mention the splendorous re¬sources of the blues tradition, which has given us the poetic genius of Robert John¬son, and also the elusive Peetie Wheatst-raw, who called himself “the Devil’s Son-in-law” and “the High sheriff of Hell.”The example of Albert Ryder will showthat we are not without forerunners in ear¬lier American painting. It is also worthmentioning the interesting American com¬ics tradition, beginning with George Herri-man’s remarkable Krazy Kat, and contin¬uing with the explosive magnificence of theanimated cartoons of Tex Avery, the su¬per-heroes Captain Marvel and PlasticMan, and the inimitable Bugs Bunny. Last¬ly, we may mention some of the heroes ofAmerican cinema, whose surrealist char¬acter is clear: Charlie Chaplin, BusterKeaton, W.C. Fields, the Marx Brothers.I must emphasize, however, that the rev¬elation of the (so to speak) “national” his¬torical roots of the surrealist attitude inthis country can in no way detract fromthe intrinsically and necessarily inter¬national surrealist perspective. There is no“national” surrealism. The imagination,like the proletariat has no country.Besides the present exhibition, how doessurrealism manifest its presence in theUnited States? And what are your plans?Surrealism is just now beginning its sub¬versive intervention in the “Americandream.” Those of us who presently adhereto its principles and aims see ourselves asa nucleus of theoretical and practical ac¬tivity which must continue to broaden,deepen and expand. Our activity up tillnow therefore reflects only the preliminary— or premonitory — phase of our devel¬opment, and serves us as a point of depar¬ture for the future.We have published three issues of Sur¬realist Insurrection a periodical agitationalwall-poster; a fourth issue is in prepara¬tion. We also issued a compilation of oldersurrealist theoretical and polemical texts(by Breton, Peret, Crevel, Calas, Mabilleetc.) under the title of Surrealism & Revo- lution. we are preparing a theoretical jour¬nal, and several pamphlets and leaflets.Our earlier agitational leaflets (celebratingthe destruction of McCormick Place: pro¬testing the Picasso sculpture donated tothe city, etc.), as well as an article on“The Situation of Surrealism in the U.S.”by Penelope and myself (originally pub¬lished in French in L’Archibras No. 2 areincluded as an appendix to my book ofpoems and drawings, The morning of aMachine Gun, published earlier this year.A new booklet by Ted Joans, consisting ofa short poem titled “The Truth” followedby its translation into thirty-six languages,has just been published by the Bureau ofSurrealist Research in Amsterdam.The Gallery Bugs Bunny has planned aseries of one-man shows of surrealists inthis country, as well as exhibitions of ourforeign comrades. As soon as possible, as Ihave said, we hope to organize an Inter¬national Surrealist Exhibition here. We arealso developing certain ideas regardingcultural guerrilla warfare which we shallreveal in our publications and actions.We intend to accelerate and multiply ourcritical interventions, to raise the crucialquestions raised by surrealism on everyconceivable occasion, to expose and de¬nounce the enemies of freedom, to agitate,to educate, to organize and inspire impla¬cable revolutionary thought and action.In complete solidarity with the inter¬national surrealist movement, we can saywith certainty, that SURREALISM ISWHAT WILL BE. THEGREYCITYJOURNALThe City White hath fled the earth,But where the azure waters lie,A noble city hath its birth,The City Grey that ne’er shall die.EditorMichael SorkinManaging EditorJessica SiegelAssociate EditorsMichael AndreSusan SlottowKen ShermanEllen CassedyEllen KaisseHowie SchamestT. C. FoxProductionDavid Steeleeyesfor thenew soundLusdm 97.9 fmsmack dab in the middle of your fm dial STARTS TODAYLA GUERREEST FINEthreePENNYCINEMA 2424 N. Lincolnat Fullerton-Halstedone block east ofFullerton "El" stopTel.: 528-9126FREE PARKING2438-40 N. Hoisted ‘‘So far abovethe otherthriller filmscomparisonwould befoolish.Beautifullymade andacted.”- Bosley Crowther,N Y. Times‘‘A master¬piece. One ofthe all-timegreats.”-Archer Winsten,N. Y. Post‘‘A triumphand a thriller.Erotic scenesof outrightbeauty”-Judith Crist, WJTA film byALAIN RESNAISstarringYVES MONTAND andINGRID THULINintroducingGENEVIEVE BUJOLDA Brandon Films ReleaseStudent rate Mon. thru Thurs. $1.50For special group rates, call 247-6646 or 528-9126Peter Sellers, Michael Caine, Peter Cook, Dudley MooreinTHE WRONG BOXSunday, November 17, Cobb Hall, 7 & 9 P.M. $1, CEF IIExaminations for Teachers’ CertificatesCHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLSDate of Examination: THURSDAY, JANUARY 2, 1969Deadline for Filing: MONDAY, DECEMBER 2, I968,4:30 p.m.(Applications postmarked December 1, 1968 will be accepted.) 'Title of Examination:LANGUAGEHigh School GermanHigh School SpanishHigh School FrenchMUSICVocal Music-Grades 7-12SCIENCEHigh School BiologyHigh School General ScienceHigh School ChemistryHigh School Physics SOCIAL STUDIESHigh School GeographyVOCATIONAL AND PRACTICAL ARTSHigh School DraftingHigh School Machine ShopHigh School Wood ShopSPECIALChild StudyPublic School HealthSpeech CorrectionLibrary Science-Grades 7-12Physical TherapySPECIAL NOTICE:A candidate for a teaching certificate may make application forthe examination if he has courses in progress leading to a Bachelor'sDegree, and which will make him fully eligible by February 1, 1969or if he has a degree from an accredited college or university andwill complete all requirements, including student teaching, to makehim fully eligible by February 1, 1969. Evidence of registration incourses designated above must be presented by the filing deadlinedate.Applications and required credentials (birth certificate and official transcripts) MUST be in the hands of the Board of Examiners notlater than Monday, December 2, 1968, 4:30 p.m.CANDIDATES ARE REQUESTED TO FILE APPLICATIONS ASSOON AS POSSIBLE.Place of examination will be included in letter of admission toeligible candidates. The next examination for High School and TradeVocational areas will be offered about the end of February, 1969. Atpresent, we DO NOT anticipate offering an examination for HighSchool Certificates in April, 1969.Applications may be obtained by mail or in person from:Board of Examiners, Room 624CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS228 N. La Salle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60601155 Please oend me application for Examination for 5E5Teacher’s Certificate in: =ZZ Subject area ZSNameAddress ZSZCity _ State ZipCollege •6 The fifty City JwrjiaLr Noy<Hnl#jr| vlah ClarelsFoxv Flic*IP" i HAVE A weakness for any particular type of film itis the movie about movies. This is partly because I aminvariably drawn to a Mitchel BNC camera whetherstanding on a set in actuality or encased in celluloid bywhat was probably its exact twin. That is natural: Iwould not want to be a filmmaker otherwise. There isalso, however, a love-hate relationship that exists inthese movies which contributes greatly to their attrac¬tiveness. To exist in this industry, especially in Holly¬wood, it is necessary to be madly in love with filming.How else could one possibly put up with the hatred andpretention so rampant in the field? Perhaps this world isnot so different from a good number of others, but no¬where is the love-hate relationship so clearly and strong¬ly drawn as in this genre.So 1 went to see The Legend of Lylah Clare with myemotions fully on the side of the picture before it evenbegan, while my critical intellect warned me to bewareof my emotions if I intended to make a true judgment. Itneedn't have worried. Not because this movie is so good(which it is) but because it is so strange that it forcesthe viewer constantly to readjust his outlook in order torespond.Most critical audiences, as well as self-styled “sophis¬ticated” ones (those which frequent the art houses),have tried to take this film as a satire, laughing throughmost of it and feeling uncomfortable for a large part.Renata Adler, who is a very perceptive woman (what¬ever else one might want to say of her or her prosestyle), often exemplifies «what is both best and worst inthese two audiences. She gives the best exposition oftheir response to Lylah Clare. She found it a satire whichgot carried away by the thing it was satirizing. She ac¬knowledged the picture’s craftsmanship but found faultwith its inability to maintain a constant attitude.The theater audiences with which I saw the picture, onthe other hand, tended to be much more accepting of thescap opera plot of Lylah Clare and were willing, as Iwas, to take the picture as a drama. Doing so stillpresents some rather distressing problems: what doesone do with a drama which introduces its heroine first asa minor Marilyn Monroe, then as a Marlene Dietrichwho died young, and finally as a souped-up Mae West?The answer to the problem is central to whatis going on in the picture. The story concerns KimNovak, who plays a young actress first named ElsaBrinkman, then Elsa Campbell, who is given the op¬portunity to impersonate Lylah Clare, the film stardescribed above. Novak does more than step into LylahClare’s footsteps (she does that literally at the pic¬ture opening). By the end of the movie we have noidea where Brinkman-Campbell ends and Clare begins.That is not to say that the picture is concerned withTruth (except in the most profound sense in which allart is.) Truth is nodded at but is so obscure and faraway that it is thankfully irrelevant. Lylah Clare isabout the fusion of melodramatic reality and “realreality.We like to think of satire as an integral part of‘real” reality; it is vision without emotions, the dis¬tancing with which to see intellectually. On the otherhand, the picture certainly appears at times to verge onsoap-opera. What we are not always willing to realize isthat the emotions and situations of the soap opera areoften quite real; it is only in their treatment that soapopera becomes a perversion. In Lylah Clare the world ofthe real and the world of the emotions of the cinemahave become so confused that neither the characters northe audience can distinguish between the two.Aldrich suggests, in what is the first real surpriseending I have seen in years, that this emotionless worldis far greater than Hollywood. He suggests at the sametime that it is the tragic confusion of realities itself thatresults in the death of real emotions. Had Aldrich actual¬ly been constructing a drama (or even a soap opera) hewould have permitted his audience to experience fullyIN THIS WEEK OF INAUGURATIONS, CORONA¬TIONS, BAR MITZVAHS OR WHATEVER, the Vulturehas compiled a whole list of cultural activities for you oenjoy when the effects of the celebration wear off:MusicRamsey Lewis and Jcsh White Jr. will be at AlumniHall, noi W. Belden November 23 at 9:00. Tickets are $4and $3 and are available at Ticket Central, 212 N. Micn-igan. This event is sponsored by the Alpha Beta Gammafraternity of De Paul University.1011 M ..Riikka White is still at the Quiet Kmght, 1311 NormWells. The Friday, Saturday, Sunday shows are at »,10:30, and 12:30 and cost is $2. The 8 shows are opento anyone; the rest limited to those over 21. the emotions to which he had led them. Had he beenmaking a satire he would never have let these emotionscome up in the first place.I am not at all sure that this dramatic structure fullyworks. It is certainly brilliant and exceptionally popular.But there are times when one is not quite sure whetherthe confusion lies in the minds of the characters or inthat of the artist.This is a problem I have always had with Aldrich andcan perhaps best be covered in a discussion of his style.Aldrich is part of the “realistic” school of the late fortiesand early fifties that was mostly killed off in theMcCarthy purges. It is a cinema of extremely harshimages and bold cutting. Aldrich’s editing has an incred¬ible tendency to look bold at the moment of the cut andthen impeccably correct as soon as the new image regis¬ters. At times his films look like textbooks on the art ofediting. No matter how much one may admire the man,one feels he will never have the genius to cut irregularlyand improperly the way Hitchcock and Hawks alwaysdo. What makes Aldrich rise above the ranks of merelycompetent directors is that he has taken this extremelycorrect style and taken it to its extremes, making itsomething very personal in the process. He managesthen to stand a good distance apart from his characters:I can think of no one in the American cinema (with thegreat exception of Otto Preminger) who can track with¬out an emotional commitment so consistently as Aldrich.His character judgments are almost always intellectualrather than emotional; they very often coincide with theattitudes of several of the characters in Lylah Clare.There is an extreme masculinity in Aldrich’s style andalso a factor that keeps us from entering into these filmsas fully as we would like to.Aldrich’s films are not easy to watch. Lylah Clare isn© exception. The film is full of harsh self-judgments andodd dilemmas. It is also full of fine funny dialogue andsome marvelous performances. Kim Novak is totallyconvincing as Brinkman-Campbell-Clare; she gives herbest performance since Vertigo. Although Milton Seltzeras a cancerous agent turned producer is not given starbilling, he certainly deserves it. His scene with ErnestBorgnine are a savage delight. Peter Finch, as the resur¬rected directors-tarmaker-lover, is finer than I have everseen him.The film is now at the State Lake. It’s not a master¬piece, but it is a damn sight better than 97% of thefilms of this or any other year.T. C. Fox DanceTwinkletoes LimonSparkles At HarperWITH A BACKDROP OF PROJECTED FIREWORKSand a musical background of what sounded vari¬ously like raging storms, water gurgling down a drain,waterfalls, and jazz, Jose Limon and Company begantheir program at this year’s Harper Theater Dance Fes¬tival. “The Winged,” the first work of the evening, is asomewhat uneven but very imaginative and often in¬tricate series of arrangements in which the members ofthe company appear solo, in groups of two’s or three’s,or all together, representing, among others, “NuptialFlight,” “Winged Sentinel,” “Hopper,” and “She-Drag-ons.”Particularly noteworthy among these were a duet byJennifer Muller and Avner Vered, iwo solos by LouisFalco, whose extraordinarily mobile, expressive bodyhighlighted some of the patterns in the dance, SarahStackhouse as a graceful “Unspent Wing,” and “TheFeast of Harpies” (performed to some very eerie mu¬sic—or noise) by five of the female dancers. One tech¬nique evident in a duet by Daniel Lewis and Diane Moh-rmann, in which the two crossed the stage repeating aseries of coordinated movements suggesting a progress¬ion through the frames of a film, was especially effectiveand was also used at times in other parts of the dance.The unevenness of the piece was most evident in thelarge group sequences, which often began promisinglybut then degenerated, ending with mechanical move¬ments in unimaginative groupings of two or in circles.Several of the individual performances were also weak,and in one fragment called “Duel” the trite ending (inwhich the duellers were dragged struggling off oppositesides of the stage) detracted from the power of the cho¬reography. These shortcomings, however, were generallyovercome by the increasing momentum built up throughthe course of the dance which as a whole demonstratedthe talent of the company and its choreographer.Audience reaction to “Comedy,” second on the pro¬gram Tuesday evening, was vigorous. The audience didnot jump onto the stage (either to join or to knock downthe dancers) but the prize for the loudest cries at the endof the performance goes to one person’s repeated com¬ment: “Form fine, content shit!”The content of the work, as explained in the pro¬gram, involves the representation of a “present day Ly-sistrata.” With cuteness and petulance dominating thewomen’s performances and much stamping and fits oftemper by the men, and with more bad pantomime thandance (good or bad), “Comedy” would more appro¬priately be titled “Silly.” To be successful in dance, hu¬mor must be lighter, more subtle (or more ironic), moreoriginal, and more coordinated with the movement.Some of “Comedy” was funny, but primarily because of #the use of costumes and props, wnile little of it wasmemorable.The final work, “Missa Brevis,” with music by Zol-tan Kodaiy and set and costumes by Ming Cho Lee,presented Mr. Limon for the only time. This smoothlychoreographed work displayed the grace and ease of thecompany while Mr. Limon’s presence on stage addeddignity, strength, and unity to the performance. Severalof the sequences involving three dancers achieved bal¬anced, flowing patterns of movement the rhythms ofwhich blended especially well with the music. The entirework, in fact, including the segments when the entirecast appeared together, was well-coordinated with themusic.Jose Limon will be at Harper Theatre through Sun¬day; this program will be repeated Saturday eveningand two other programs including several differentworks will be presented at the other performances. Andif you don’t like modern dance, you could always go tohear the audience.Dene KantrovCulture VulturePaul Revere and The Raiders are appearing at the Audi¬torium Saturday at 8:30. Tickets range from $3-$6.Vanilla Fudge will be at the Auditorium, Congress atMichigan, Sunday at 3:30. Tickets are again from $3-$6.Pete Seeger, meanwhile, will be at Orchestra Hall No¬vember 22, 23 at 8:30 pm. Tickets: $2.50-$4.50.Joni Mitchell is coming to Mandel Hall Monday at 8:30.Joseph Jarman Co. will be playing in Ida Noyes HallSaturday at 8 pm.Verdi’s Requiem Mass is being given by the ChicagoSymphony Orchestra Friday at 2 and Saturday at 8:30 atOrchestra Hall, 220 South Michigan.Beveridge Webster is giving a concert of Debussy,Wednesday at 8:00 in the Auditorium, Congress at Mich-November 15,1968 ■ igan. Tickets: $l-$4.50.Birgit Nilsson is giving a concert Sunday at 3:00 in Or¬chestra Hall. Tickets are $3.50 to $7.50.The Motet Choir of the Collegium Musicum, the Univer¬sity Chorus, the University Symphony Orchestra are giv¬ing “An Evening of Music by Faculty & Students inHonor of President Edward Hirsch Levi”. This “in¬auguration event” is Saturday at 8 in Mandel Hall. Ad¬mission is without charge and tickets may be picked upat the information desk and at Reynolds Club.The Collegium Musicum Motet Choir with the UniversityChamber Orchestra will give another concert Thursdayat 8 in the Lutheran School of Technology, 1100 East55th. The concert is free and will include works by Hand¬el and Ives.Tho Grey Cky Journal ’ 7 **Dance 1Mazowsze, a Warsaw company of 100 dancers and sing¬ers complete with Symphony Orchestra will be at theAuditorium November 22-24. This is prior warning andwe will withhold further information until next week.Jose Limon Dance Company will be at the HarperTheatre, 5238 South Harper, Friday and Saturday at 8:30and Sunday at 2:30 and 7:30.The Erick Hawkins Dance Co will be there the followingweekend.TheaterThe New Old Fashioned Baroque Compass Players willpresent a special “Best of Show” review after the danceprograms mentioned above. This review features thebest satire — political, social, Hyde-Park farcial — frompast shows, plus some experiments in improvisationaltheater. On Saturday afternoon from 1:30-4 they will givea free public workshop on techniques of satire and im-provisation. In this workshop the audience can observeor join in the theater games and exercises on pantomine,characterization and scene structure. Coffee’s free too.(additional note: any place that uses Carl Orff’s settingof “The Campbells are Coming, Hurrah, Hurrah!” hasgot to groove. Yes?)The Shirt by Leonard Melfi, will be given by the ChicagoCity Players Touring Theater at the Museum of Contem¬porary Art, 237 East Ontario, at 7:30 Wednesday. Thisperformance is part of the month-long program of artrelating to the “Violence in American Art” exhibit. Theplay presents an encounter between a young, raciallymixed couple living in New York and a Southerner vis¬iting the city.Little Mary Sunshine a spoof of the Jeanette MacDonald-Nelson Eddy musicals of the 30’s and 40’s will open atthe Ivanhoe Theatre, 3000 North Clark St. November19th. Curtain times are 8:30 Tuesday through Friday, 6and 9:30 Saturday, and 7 Sundays. Tickets: $3.50-$5.Oklahoma will be at the St Thomas Apostle Church, 5472South Kimbark this weekend and next. Curtain timesFriday and Saturday is at 8 and Sunday at 1:30 and 7:00.Tickets are $1 for students and $2 for others.“The Indian Wants the Bronx” and “It’s Called the Sug¬ ar Plum” both by Israel Horovitz are in their last twoweekends at the Jane Adams Theater, 3212 North Broad¬way. Many and various curtain times and prices.The Death and Lifeof Sneaky Fitch by James Rosen¬berg, opens Friday at the Goodman Theatre, 200 SouthColumbus. This play is a farcial comedy on the ClassicWestern theme modernized with a cowardly hero. Fridayand Saturday performances are at 8:30; Tuesday-Thurs-day and Sunday. They are at 7:30.Ticketsare $4 week¬ends and $3.50 all other times.The White Devil will be given at the Reynolds ClubTheatre at 8 Wednesday through Saturday. The WhiteDevil, written in 1612, by John Webster, is set in a worldwhere politicians rule without regard to morals andwhere men and women cannot live according to emo¬tions. The plot concerns moral confusion ensuing and theattempt of two people to maintain a love affair withinthis world. In the production, T. C. Fox has adapted it tomodern dress and has included film and music by ClydeStats.PoetryDennis Schmitz and James Tate, prize winning Midwes¬tern poets, will read their poetry at 8 in Ida Noyes Li¬brary Sunday. James Tate’s first book, “Lost Pilot” wasthe 1967 Yale Younger Poet’s Selection. Dennis Schmitz,graduate of the University, will have his book publishedas winner of the Follet Young Poet’s Competition. Ad¬mission is 75 cents.Anne Sexton, winner of last, year’s Pultizer Prize, andKenneth Koch, leading spirit of the New York Gallerypoets, will be honored by Poetry Magazine Sunday. Theywill give a reading of their poetry at 8:30 at the Pruden¬tial Plaza Auditorium, Michigan at Randolph. Cost is$2.00.“Black Writers” will be presented by the Letters andDrama Assembly Wednesday at the Chicago Public Li¬brary second floor auditorium at 7:15. Program will fea¬ture Lerone Bennet, Jr., editor of Ebony Magazine andEugene Perkins, editor of the Free Black Press and au¬thor of Black is Beautiful.Mixed Media program will be given at the Blue GargoyleFriday at 9. Present and performing will be William Henkin, editor of Tri-Quarterly, Ramon Zupho, playinghis electronic poetry, a HUAC dramatization, SanctuaryBlues Band and even a Hipps^everman Jazz Band. Tick¬ets are $1.ArtBergman Gallery will display contemporary art fromChicago collectors November 30. The exhibit includesworks by Picasso, Ernst, Coulder, Klee, Marisol and oth¬ers. The gallery, for those of you who are not aware ofits existence is in Cobb Hall, room 418.False Image is an exhibit at the Hyde Park Art Center,5236 S. Blackstone opening Sunday from 7-9 and contin¬uing until December 21. Works by Brown, Dube, Hanson,Ramberg. Hours: Tuesday-Thursday 1-4. Saturdays 10-4.FilmsThe Wrong Box, Sunday, 7 and 9, Cobb Hall, Contempo¬rary European Films. Bryan Forbes at his very best.The plot of this super-delightful British parody of Victo¬rian mores is so complex that I won’t try to relate it.Suffice it to say that a frantic pace is kept up with aseries of imaginative killings, attempted fratercide, mis¬taken identity (The Bourmouth Strangler for Uncle Rob¬ert), unscrupulous nephews, one beautiful girl courted byMichael Caine in his prime (Bryan Forbes seems to beout of his prime also — witness the colossal flop Dead¬fall), and naturally, a grand chase.Intolerance, at 7 and 10 pm in Cobb Hall, tonight, doc.films. This is one of the most important films of its era.D. W. Griffith had great vision and any chance to see hiswork is welcome.La Guerre Est Finie opens today at the Three PennyCinema. This study of past and present as reflected inthe life an an aging Spanish loyalist in contemporarySpain is an excellent film.Topkapi, tomorrow night in Cobb Hall, 7:30 and 9:30p.m. presented by Pierce Tower Cinema. A very enter¬taining sophisticated-jewel-thief-type flick.Marat Sade, next Wednesday at 7 and 9:15 in Cobb Hall,CEF. This film is very faithful to the provacative play,and is performed by the Old Vic company.WHPK-FM 88.3>'irst on your dialUniversity of Chicago student-operated radioWEEKDAYS AT A GLANCE7:00-10:30 a.m. Happy Wake-Up Service (News at 8)3:00 Soul (News at 6:00)6:05 Rock (News at 8:45)9 00 Community Viewpoint9:45 Campus news and eventsComprehensive Critic10:00 Classical (News at 12)12:05 Jazz (until 2:30 a.m.)FRIDAY 157:00-10:30 a.m. Dr. Feelgood’sHappy Sound TherapyClinic (News at 8)3:00 South Side Soul6:00 News6:05 Petticoat Lane8:45 News: Evening report9:00 Community Viewpoint:University Housing Pol¬icies In Woodlawn9:45 Campus news and eventsComprehensive Critic:Chicago SymphonyConcert10:00 Joint Session12:00 News12:05 (to be announced)SATURDAY 16Noon Conversations at Chicago‘‘Trade Unions andLabor Relations”12:30 The Flea Market(News at 3 and 6,sports at 6:05)9:45 Campus news and eventsComprehensive Critic:Lyric Opera’s ‘‘Oedipus”and ‘‘Rossignol”10:00 News: Evening report10:15 Listening with Ratner:Mahler - Symphonies 4and 5, Kindertotenleider(News at 12)SUNDAY 17Noon Hellhound: Real Bluesrediscovered countryartists.2:00 Folk music with Chaet(News at 3)4:00 Sunday Soul Session6:00 News6:05 African Highlife andCalypso8:00 Hoochie Coochie Man:sweet soft soul9:45 Campus news and eventsComprehensive Critic:Records - Mahler’s‘‘Knaben Wunderhorn”10:00 News: Evening report10:15 The Om Point: Music forthe avataric age12:00 News12:05 Stonehenge RevisitedMONDAY 187:00-10:30 a.m. Millard Ho war’sAmerican Happy Wake-UpSer 'ice for Americans(NeAis at 8)3:00 A Stone Thing6:00 News 6:05 Evolution: A1 Kooper8:45 News: Evening report9:00 Community Viewpoint9:45 Campus news and eventsComprehensive Critic:book review10:00 Blitzina: Beethoven -Kreutzer Sonata; SchubertUnfinished Symphony;Harris-Symphony No. 312:00 News12:05 Round About MidnightTUESDAY 197:00-10:30 a.m. (to be an¬nounced)3:00 South Side Soul6:00 News6:05 History of WesternCivilisation: Blues8:45 News: Evening report9:00 Community Viewpoint9:45 Campus news and eventsComprehensive Critic:Film - ‘‘Accident”10:00 M.o.z.a.r.t: Brahms-Violin and cello concerto;F asch - Symphony in GMajor Haydn - Trio in CMajor Mozart - SymphonyNo. 36 Schumann -Symphony No. 31 2:00 News12:05 Andy’s BluesWEDNESDAY 207:00-10:30 a.m. (to be ary-nounced)3:00 T.C.B. with Topp6:00 News6:05 Chicken Shack8:00 The Blue Gargoyle8:45 News: Evening report9:00 Community ViewpointPhone-in9:45 Campus news and eventsComprehensive Critic:Renaissance Society:Museum of Contemporary Art10:00 Classical Groovies:Schumann, Hindemith,Mozart, Grieg, Haydn12:00 News12:05 Jazz Mann: Guitar SpecialTHURSDAY 21-7:00-10:30 a.m. (to be an¬nounced)3:00 Thursday Soul Session6:00 News6:05 Obituary for the Left Forka burst of the best in bigbeat to bury a taste done-in by overdose8:45 News: Evening report9:00 Community Viewpoint:U.F.O’s, pt. 49:45 Campus news and eventsComprehensive Critic:Goodman’s ‘‘Life andDeath of Sneaky Fitch”10:00 Cathedral Concert12:00 News12:05 One foot in the gutter:turn of the decade, 1958 -1962Cut out this program guide and paste your radio under it.authorized BMC X**C^ sales & service5424 s. kimbark ave. mi 3-3113Chicago, illinois 60615h^ r - .foreign car hospital & clinic, inc. HYDE PARK2ndHILARIOUSWEEK6,6 Purelunacy...uproariouslyfunny!”-TIME ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA LECTURESbyMORTIMER J. ADLERDirector of the Institute for Philosophical ResearchJoseph E Levine Preser.lsZEROMCSTELm Mel Brooks'“THEPCCDLCECS'A Sidney Glozier ProductionLast 3 NightsNov. 15 - 17BUKKA WHITE3 Shows NightlySpecial! 8 pm ShowsOpen To All AgesThe Quiet Knight131 I N. WellsOld Town 944-8755The Carpet BamA division of Cortland CarpetWe have an enormous se¬lection of new and usedwall-to-wall carpetings,staircase runners, rem¬nants and rugs (a large se¬lection of genuine andAmerican orientals).We open our warehouse tothe public for retail saleson Saturdays ONLY from9-3.1228 W. Kinzie (at Racine)243-2279 Friday,November 15:Tuesday,November 19:Thursday,November 21:Tuesday,November 26: THE TIME OF OUR LIVESThe Real and the Apparent GoodOughts Can Be True and Goods Can Be RightThe Ethics of Common-SenseIs this a Good Time To Be Alive and Is Oursa Good Society To Be Alive In?All lectures begin at 8:00 P.M.Admission Free Kent 107QuantrellAuditoriumQuantrellAuditoriumQuantrellAuditoriumGriffith’s INTOLERANCEtonight, 7 and 10 P.M. Cobb Hall 75c doc films.8 The Grey City Journali 3.r Tu r i i November 15. 1968tit'i l ,fj! I-J‘4'll5*•->/]