L Vol. 75-No. 33Dodd Huuse nesiaentsDeclare House Autonomyby Rob SkeistThe members of Dodd Househave revolted against theauthority of the Dean of Stu¬dents and the Inter-HouseCouncil (1HC) and declared them¬selves autonomous on the issueof house hours. The action wastaken at a house meeting. Tuesdaynight.A declaration passed by themembers of Dodd House with onlydissenting vote states:“We. the members of Dod House,consider it our right to regulate thehours at which women may visit usin our rooms. We feel that it is notwithin the province of the Inter-House Council or the Dean of Stu¬dents to approve our decisions re¬lating to this matter of visitinghours, and that henceforth therules which we set up are in effectand will be enforced and policedonly by members of the house. Uni¬versity regulations concerning vis¬iting hours in Dodd House are fromnow on null and void.”DEAN OF STUDENTS, WarnerA. Wick’s only reaction to the DoddHouse action was to say that, iiluy can’t secede from the Uni jversity.”Loren Schweninger, resident-headof Dodd House was at the housemeeting but did not support thedeclaration. “My views are unim-1 portant,” he said. ‘‘My hands aretied. I have little influence with thehouse or Mr. Wick on this issue.”When asked if he would supportDodd House on this matter Schwe¬ninger said, “No. I don’t think Ican.”The CommentPaul Burstein, head of the Inter-IIouse Council (IHC), commentedthat “Mr. Wick is the representa¬tive of the University and I certain¬ly agree with him. Dodd Housecan't have freedom without respon¬sibility. They’ll have to work withinthe framework of the University.”Burstein pointed out that DoddHouse has abolished its govern¬ment, so it does not have a repre¬sentative on IHC.The Undergraduate Council ofStudent Government (SG), howev¬er, has voted to offer its support toDodd House, according to SG Pres¬ident Tom Heagy.Heagy issued a statement yester¬day that “The first meeting of theUndergraduate Council of StudentGovernment voted overwhelminglyto support houses in the dormitorysystem that deny the right of theDean of Students or the Inter-House Council to restrict house au¬tonomy.”THE RESOLUTION states, how¬ever, that SG will act only upon therequest of a house, the nature ofSG’s role to be determined by con¬sultation with the house. Asks UC to Withdraw Funds from ContinentalSDS Presents Appealby John WelchUC Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) held a rally, Wednesday afternoon, on theAdministration Building steps and presented an appeal asking the University to withdrawits account from the Continental Illinois National Bank.The appeal followed the Bank’s refusal on Monday to withdraw from a consortium lend¬ing money to the Union of South ;Africa, which led to a sit-in in frontof the Bank.The appeal, initiated by SDSand co-signed by 51 faculty mem¬bers, was presented to Walter V.Leen, Secretary to the Board ofTrustees. It read, “Because Conti¬nental Illinois Bank & Trust Com¬pany, the University’s banker, be¬longs to a ten-bank consortiumwhich maintains a $40 millionself-renewing loan fund to theTreasury of South Africa, we theundersigned appeal to the Universi¬ty of Chicago Board of Trustees totransfer the University’s accountand other banking business to anon-consortium bank.”AT THE BRIEF meeting withLeen, Steve Kindred, a UC studentrepresenting SDS, also asked that adelegation from that group be invit¬ed to speak to the Board meetingthat discusses the appeal. He wastold to see President Beadle. At ameeting Wednesday night, partici¬pants in the SDS South African going on, Christopher Hobson, alsoa student, made a short speechconcerning faculty response to theappeal. “The positive response wasencouraging,” Hobson said. “Wegot signatures from people we nev¬er expected would sign, and frompeople we had never heard of.”The negative response, on theother hand, Hobson described as“instructive.” There were mainlytwo categories of negative re¬sponse, Hobson explained: “thosepeople who said they were in sym¬pathy with our stand, yet would notsign the appeal, and those who be¬lieved it was the wrong thing assuch.”Both Groups LiberalBoth groups were liberals, headded. “Both believe the South Af¬rican regime is wrong.”The first group, Hobson said, wasexemplified by a faculty memberwho predicted that universitieswould soon be subjected to attacksby right-wingers over Vietnam pro¬campaign drc.ded that if Beadle j tests and said “now is not the timedenied the request for an invita¬tion, they would send the delega¬tion anyway.While the meeting with Leen was to divide the university communi¬ty.” The professor quoted a Balkanpolitician who said that the impor¬tant thing in politics was not one'sPolk, Harberger, Morgenthau ConsensusBank Protests Impractical, Profs Agreeby John WelchUC student protests againstContinental Illinois NationalBank's loans to South Africahave little chance of affectingthe Bank’s policy and even less ofhurting the economy of SouthAfrica.This was the conclusion of threefaculty members speaking at apanel discussion at Kent Hall yes¬terday on “National Policy andPrivate Power.”A DISRUPTION of the SouthAfrican economy, moreover, wouldonly hurt black South Africans, thepanelists agreed. They were Will¬iam R. Polk, professor of history;Arnold C. Harberger, chairman ofthe Economics Department; andHans J. Morgenthau, professorof political science.Polk, a member of the PolicyPlanning Council during the Ken¬nedy administration, spoke of thedifficulty the US government hasin exerting its power in the inter¬nal affairs of other countries.“Ivook at Vietnam,” he said.In 1061 Polk was charged withreviewing US policy in SouthAfrica. He said the administrationbegan with high hopes of aidingthe repressed black majorities inplaces like Angola and SouthAfrica, but quickly found thatthere were limitations to US power.For instance, he said, this coun¬try can’t do much about Portugue¬se African policy because “ourplanes need to land in the Portu¬guese Azores.”' Impersonal TrendsHarberger noted, “Market trend actions arc completely impersonal.We don't ask about the politicalopinions or private lives of thosewe buy from. Our only interest isin the cash they lay on the count¬er.”The a morality of the market is,he observed, “a very importantbulwark of freedom. The nature ofan individual’s opinions is irre¬levant.” When the market ceasesto be impersonal its function isimpaired, Harburger said. He com¬mented that when some sellers arefavored and other disfavored, high¬er prices will be charged by the favored. “This is uneconomic,” hesaid.Harberger asserted that the pur¬poses behind asking the Universityto withdraw its account from Con¬tinental are utopian, and open totoo many problems.THE BEST thing for you to do,Harberger no‘ed, would be to backa new international currency re¬serve, since rising gold prices dueto a gold shortage would help SouthAfrica.'Indigestion'Morgenthau then illustrated fourpoints about measures against Con-Morgenthau, Wolf Open Viet ColloquiumThe first Beardsley Ruml Colloquium on “The VietnamProblem” opens this afternoon at 3:30 pm with a policydebate between UC Professor of Political Science Hans J.Morgenthau and Charles Wolf, a Rand Corporation economist.JACQUES DECORNOY, a reporttives in Paris and Algiers.Papers by Geoffrey C. Hazard ofthe UC Law School and Tom Hay¬den of the Newark Community Un¬ion Project and a panel discussionof experts will consider “DomesticConsequences of the Viet NamWar,” Saturday morning.SMALL DISCUSSION groups fol¬lowing both this evening’s and to¬morrow morning’s main programsare to be lead by students with col¬loquium speakers sitting in on sev¬eral of them.The colloquium will wind up itsprogram tomorrow afternoon witha panel discussion of the “EthicalImplications for Individuals and In¬stitutions.”er for the independent Frenchnewspaper Le Monde who has beencovering South East Asia for twoyears, will address a dinner meet¬ing tonight at Burton-Judson Hall.Decornoy spent nine weeks inSouth Vietnam in 1966 and has beenwriting a series of analytical arU-cles on the war for Le Monde.Featuring both radical and con¬servative speakers, the panel dis¬cussion at 8:00 pm on Vietnam poli¬cy will feature speakers withfirst-hand experience suck as San¬ford Gottlieb. Political Action Di¬rector of S.A.N.E. and organizer ofthe 1965 march on Washington, whohas had personal contact with Na¬tional Liberation Front representa- tinental Illinois, evoking laughterthat nearly filled the auditorium,.• It is impossible, Morgenthausaid, to institute a meaningfulboycott against institutions whichone considers evil by their as¬sociation with evil. What wouldhappen, he asked, if a piece ofmeat he eats for dinner comesfrom a packing plant which doesbusiness with Continental? “Per¬haps I should have indigestion.”• There is nothing that can af¬fect, Continental Illinois. Morgen¬thau said he had dinner recentlywith David Rockefeller, chairmanof the board of Chase ManhattanBank, which was the target of anearlier campaign against lendingmoney to South Africa. “Twentythree million dollars is said tohave been withdrawn from ChaseManhattan during the campaign,”said Morgenthau, “but Rockefellerdid not seem to have insomniaover it.’”• “It is a misconceived ideato think that banks have souls ormoral identities.” Banks are neu¬tral with regard to the purpose forwhich money is lent, Morgenthauremarked. A University may havethe soul, he continued, but thereach of its moral principles ismuch less than that of an individ¬ual.• Banks remain within the limitof US policy in making loans toSouth Africa. The prosperity whichexists in South .Africa has had amitigating effect on the SouthAfrican government’s racial pol¬icy, he asserted. In an economiccrisis, the blacks would be theonly ones affected. actions, but others’ reactions.“Notice,” Hobson pointed out,“that the only Balkan country tomaintain its independence has beenYugoslavia, which has stood up forits beliefs. We think that the onlyway to maintain our civil libertiesis to exercise them to the fullest.”The second group, and more in¬teresting one, Hobson said, was ex¬emplified by James Redfield’s“Gadfly” in the Tuesday Maroon.Redfield is “approaching the prob¬lem as a hippy. This is shown inhis cute little remark about Hein¬rich Himmler’s hairdresser.”The speaker explained that tradi¬tional radical line says that “every¬thing is rotten, so let’s take themall on.” Traditional liberal thoughtis that everything is rotten so we’llattack things one at a time. “Red-field is saying ‘everything is rottenas Hell, and I don’t give a damn.’ ”“This”, Hobson added, “indicatesthe bankruptcy of current liberalthought.”THE WEDNESDAY NIGHTmeeting, attended by about Lt stu¬dents (and, for a short time, oneplainclothes policeman), voted tocontinue the campaign in twoparts, an ‘outside” move against(he Bank, and an inside campaigndemanding that the Universitywithdraw its account.The off-campus activity will beaimed at promoting mass with¬drawals from the Bank sometimein the spring. People were selectedto contact labor unions, churches,civil rights groups, and other sup¬posedly liberal institutions, and askthem to withdraw accounts, as wellas give money to SDS for bail.Within the next couple weeks,SDS will begin signing up people toleaflet the Bank periodically.Teams will hand out leaflets inshifts about three days each week.• ' ,s > 5^ *•< '* ' ',s -<>Folk Festival>*'<*■ Z<'"Today begins the largest folk fes¬tival in the University’s recent his¬tory. Sponsored by Jhe Fo’klore So¬ciety and honoring the University’s75th anniversary, the Seventh An¬nual University of Chicago FolkFestival will feature such names asLester Flatt and Earl Scruggs, theFoggy Mountain Boys, and the NewLost City Ramblers.Tickets are now on sale at theMandel Hall Box Office: eveningconcerts $3, $2.50. $2; Saturday aft¬ernoon $1.50, $1 (students here).Friday, January 274 pm—Reception, Ida Noyes Hall.8:15 pm—Concert. Mandel HallSaturday, January 2811 am—Guitar Workshop, Ida Noyes.12:46 pm—Lecture, “Ballad VocalStyles”, Ida Noyes.3 pm—Concert, Mandel Hall.8:15 pm—Concert, Mandel HaU.Sunday, January 2810 pm—Vocal Styles Workshop, IdaNoyes.11:15 am—Lecture, “A Collecting Tripto Scotland”, Ida Noyes.! 1:30 pm—Panel Discussion. “What Kindof Folk Festival is most Worth Hav¬ing”, Ida Noyea.3 pm—Hoofenany, Ida Noyes: Folk andSquare Dance, Ida Noyes.8:15 pm—Concert, Mandia Had.Profs Here Comment■ mmmammmmmMmmmmmmmmmmmmammmmmmmammmmMixed Reactions to Bank Sit-InUC professors of the Divi¬sion of Social Sciences hadmixed reactions to yesterday’ssit-in at the Continental IllinoisNational Bank.Gerhard Meyer, professor of eco¬nomics, said that while he sympa¬thized with the object of the bankdemonstrations, he questioned themethod the demonstrators chose touse. He feared that the protestmight actually backfire, gettingbad publicity and a negative publicresponse. Meyer pointed out thedifference between a Negrositting-in at a lunch counter in pro¬test against discrimination whichdirectly affects his life and stu¬dents protesting a problem only re¬ motely involving them. A more ef¬fective means of fighting apartheid,he declared, would be throughthe U.S. government.JESSE LEMISCH, assistant pro¬fessor of history, asserted, “I wasthere. I support the people one hun¬dred per cent. What they are ask¬ing is right. The bank should havenothing to do with South Africa. I! really admire the students who| sat-in today.”“It is important to dramatize thedegree to which American corpora¬tions are involved in supportingapartheid in South Africa,” assert¬ed Richard Flacks, assistant pro¬fessor in sociology. He added thatevery organization which has stud¬ied South Africa has recommended that the consortium banks with¬draw their funds. “What they didwill hopefully lead the Universityto reconsider its position and willopen up discussion on an issue toolong ignored.”Hans Morgenthau, professor inthe department of political scienceand history, asserted that whilethere is no harm in the student pro¬test, no good will come of it either.“It is of no political significancewhatever,” he said.Strong opposition to the sit-incame from Lloyd Fallers, professorof the department of anthropology.Fallers declared, “I am not at allconvinced that discouraging invest¬ment in South Africa is the bestway to help black South Africans.”Group Hears Marine Who Told Superiors To 'Shove' Ordersby Ina SmithBarry Laing, a Marine corporal and self-professed conscien-cious objector who told his superiors to “take the orders andshove ’em,” Wednesday gave what he called a morale-boostingtalk to the We Won’t Go group here.The We Won’t Go Group consistsof students who refuse to serve inthe U.S. armed forces because oftheir objection to the Vietnam waras being “immoral.”Laing spoke at Ida Noyes Hall onthe position of the CO within themilitary.WE DESCRIBED how he was 'drafted after failing to obtain CO jstatus on the grounds that he did |not believe in a supreme being. Hedid not ignore his induction orders,he said, because he thought hewould be able to appeal his casethrough the military.He then discovered that such ap¬peals were either quickly rejectedor nonexistent.Laing also recounted how he was ' shipped to Okinawa and, after tell¬ing the Marines what they could dowith their orders, quickly ended upSTATIONERYBOOKSGREETING (ARDS******THE BOOK NOOKMl 3-75111540 I. S5tH ST.10% Student Ditcawnt in the brig, where he was not al¬lowed to communicate with anyoneon the outside, even a lawyer.HE MANAGED to get his caseheard before a federal court on thebasis that in cases of constitutionalrights, military courts could beoverruled by federal ones.Weekends through February SthJAMES BALDWIN'SBLUES FORMR. CHARLIEHULL HOUSE PARKWAY500 East 47th StreetReservations: 324-3M0CUSTOM PROGRAMMINGCARD PROCESSINGKEY PUNCHINGCALL MRS. BLIXT AT 782-2118FOR A TIME AND COST ESTIMATER. SKIRMONT & ASSOCIATES. INC.COMPUTER APPLICATION CONSULTANTS33 N. LaSalle St. Chicago, III. 60602Chicago Opera TheatreChicago Jass EnsembleConducted by WILLIAM RUSSOPRESENTORPHEUSV ; * Si h : .JASS MASS by /©hn austin■' II;by theodore ashfordA i i t7:30 pm FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH45th & KIMBARKSaturday Jan. 28th Admission: Free Students Invited to Current Smokers:'Really Nothing Wrong with the Frats'“There’s really nothingwrong with fraternities,” wasthe enthusiastic comment ofHardy Adasko, president ofthe Inter-Fraternity Council at UC.If male students are still interest¬ed m joining any of UC’s eight stal¬wart, or at least existing, fraterni¬ties, and if they are strong enoughto ignore the warning that, “Ciga¬rette smoking may be hazardous tohealth,” they are cordially invitedto attend any or all of the upcom¬ing “smokers.” These gatherings,which will be held this week andnext, are for the purpose of ac¬quainting students with the “exist¬ence, character, and membershipof each of UC’s fraternities.”Adasko stressed the idea that oneneed not smoke to attend a smoker,but merely come and socialize be¬tween 7:30 and 10:30 on the properevening. When asked if any fe¬ males would be present, Adasko al¬luded to the possibility of “hostess¬es.” And he promised that if stu¬dents attend the smokers, they willdiscover that, "We have a new im¬age of fraternities at UC.”Whether for motivations of broth¬erhood or “hostesses”, the fraterni¬ties are hoping for a large turn out.Liberty, equality, fraternies. . .Teorell AppointedDr. E. Torsten A. Teorell, an au¬thority on the biophysics of cellmembranes, has been named a Vis¬iting Professor of Physiology.Dr. Teorell is professor of physiology and Head of the Institute ofPhysiology and Medical Biophysicsat the University of Uppsala inSweden. He is also a member ofthe Royal Academy of Sciences inStockholm and the Royal Society ofSciences in Uppsala.APPEARING NIGHTLYCLASSICAL GUITARISTMICHAEL SWEETCAFE ENRICO1411 E. 53rd St. HY 3-5300For ReservationsSERMON SERIESISSUES OF LIFE AND DEATHFirst Unitarian Church57th and WoodlawnJack A. Kent, ministerSunday mornings at 11:00LSDSUICIDEALIENATION. ISOLATIONAND LONELINESS January 29February 5February 12WHY A CHURCH?discussion led by Jack A. Kent,Sunday evening, January 29at tight o'clockCHURCH PARLOR - ENTRANCE 1174 E. 57* ST."• i "M .Is Unitarianism a religion? Why is it organized In churchesand fellowships when the religious authority rests with theindividual? What is its role in the community in civil rights,peace, and other pressing issues In today's world?visitors cordially invited byFirst Unitarian Church and The StudentReligious Liberals2 • CHICAGO MAROON • January 27, 1967Livernash Renews CampaignNew SG Charter Flight ChargesSteve Livernash, former stu-1 charter and has been such a mem-dent Government (SG) trea- bfr,for at teast six months immedi-oen, . . . ... . | ately prior to the date on whichsurer and persistant critic of j charter operations are to be com-SG finances has renewed his mencedcharges against the UC’s chargerflight program. The program is ad¬ministered by SG.In a letter to members of the SGAssembly, Mr. Livernash has madeseveral criticisms of the advertise¬ment which has appeared in theOther and in the Student Govern¬ment Calendar being mailed to stu¬dents.All flights this year are on mem¬ber airlines of the International AirTransport Association (IATA), andcontracts with such airlines alwaysbind SG (the charterer) to obey therules that IATA has agreed uponaccording to Livernash.One such rule is that "eachmember of the party to be trans¬lated is a member of the group atthe time of application for theYou’re invited fo aMIXERSATURDAYJAN. 28from 8:30 p.m. until 1.4)0 a.m.in the beautiful CrystalBallroom of the newEQUITABLEBUILDINGPioneer Court401 North Michigan AvenueStarringYESTERDAY'SCHILDRENPLUSSURPRIZE BANDwith thelatest sounds for dancingCASUAL DRESS(eg. sweaters, sport shirts,slacks, etc. Suits & dressesare O.K. too.)STAG OR DATES(Stag preferred)Everyone 18 or over is invited.BAR OPENto those 21 and older “SG’s statement that members ofUC whose affiliation began beforeJanuary 10, 1967, may participate,meets neither of these require¬ment,” said Livernash.Another rule states that “thecharterer agrees that any solicita¬tion material shall include a state¬ment that income in excess of thecarrier’s charter price plus reason¬able expenses will be refunded prorata to the charter passengers.”This notice has been omitted,Livernash charged. In addition theCivil Aeronautics Board has saidthat “any announcements or state- page to one,” Livernash continued.“A price breakdown was not in¬cluded because, the previous year,a stencil containing this informa¬tion was destroyed by BernieGrofman, then SG President, be¬cause it would have enabled pas¬sengers to estimate the size of theirrefunds (which they were beingasked to donate to SG). Grofmanordered all the mimeod copies de¬stroyed (though I retrieved a copyfrom the trash), and a new editionprepared which understated admin¬istrative expenses and excluded thecontingency reserve.”Dispite this incident, Livernashclaimed that most SG mistakes ap¬pear to be purely accidental.The most recent example, Liver¬nash stated, is a series of handoutsments by the charterer to prospec-! Registration Procedure’tive charter Dartieinanfs shall or ^“Shts C, B, and A preparedtive charter participants shallclearly identify the portion of thecharges to be separately paid forthe air transportation, for the landtour, and for the administrative ex¬penses of the charterer.“Although following this rulemay not be mandatory, is would beprudent to obey it, “Livernashcommented.Asked about the origin of thesemistakes, Livernash stated thateach one was made last year also.He accepted responsibility for theincorrect definition of eligibility,“not having completely digestedthe 1965 revision of the rules...“The refund notice was eliminat¬ed from his first draft of the an¬nouncement by the charter flightcommittee, in the process of cut-I ting the text from two sides of aIts happening again atPHI PSI"A PARTY TO REMEMBER'Music by the Privy Council8:30 pm. Sat. 28th54th and WoodlawnCome on Over respectively on Jan. 1, 4, and 9,1967.The subsequent editions Liver¬nash stated preserve this mistake,and through careless retyping,make additional mistakes which al¬ter the meaning of the provisions. Students AdmittedA S V,. .To Roosevelt SenateRoosevelt University’s Faculty Senate has granted full votingand speaking membership to two student representatives.The Faculty Senate, a representative body which has au¬thority on academic matters of the University, unanimouslyapproved a request from the Stu¬dent Senate for full-fledged votingmembers.Student representatives have formany years had the right to speakin the Faculty Senate, but not tovote. The two full student memberswill now be able to move and sec¬ond new proposals, giving thempower to force the Faculty Senateto either table or act on each mo¬tion.SINCE LAST spring, studentshave also been full members ofthirteen standing committees of theadministration, including the curric¬ulum committee. Faculty Senatecommittees will now also havestudent voting members.The two students who were elect¬ed by the Student Senate to sit on the Faculty Senate have both beennon-voting student representativesin the Faculty Senate in the past.They are Carmon Dunigan, Presi¬dent of the Student Senate, andRichard Nelson, a former studentsenator.SOME INDICATION of the will¬ing sentiment of faculty in admit¬ting student members was given byPaul Johnson, dean of the graduateschool, who commented, “The ov¬erworked faculty and administra¬tion is all too happy to delegatereponsibilities to the Student Senateif it wants to take them.”Some faculty members asked forreciprocal privileges for faculty onthe Student Senate. This was ve¬toed by the Dean of Students, how¬ever.Morgenthau ClaimsHans Morgenthau, UC his¬tory professor, has little incommon with the members ofthe New Left who share hisanti-Vietnam position, according toNicholas von Hoffman, a reporterfor The Washington Post.“I have nothing to do with theNew Left, which is essentially an¬archistic, a still-born movementwhich can have no influence onAmerican politics,” Morgenthauwas quoted as saying in a vonHoffman column appearing on Jan¬uary 4.“My opposition to the war is es- No Association with New LeftistsJoseph H. AaronConnecticut MutualLife Insurance Protection135 S. LaSalle St.Ml 3-5986 RA 6-1060MUSTANGS - TEMPESTS - FORDS - PONTIACSRENT-A-CARBYVolkswagens $3.95 for 12 Hrs.Plus 6* per Mi.Includes Gas and InsuranceRent A Volkswagon For That Special Date Tonite.Cheaper Than A Honda And A Heck Of A LotMore Comfortable.LOCATED AT:HYDE PARK CAR WASH1330 E. 53rd Ml 3-1715 UTY SALONExpertPermanent WavingHair CuttingandTintingI. 58*1 9». NY 8-8802 sentially pragmatic. It’s the wrongwar in the wrong place, a good pur¬pose wrongly pursued,” Morgen¬thau explained.“My opposition to this war islike a guy buying stock that’s nogood- Finally there comes a pointwhen you sell your stock and takeyour losses. It’s not a question thatI’m against the stock exchange orcapitalism,” Morgenthau contin¬ued.Von Hoffman sees Morgenthau as“a realpolitik man,” who viewsthings critically and “with an un¬derstanding detachment.” He “ex¬pects less of his fellowmen than theNew Left does,” the columnistsaid.Morgenthau has had problemswith Washington, von Hoffman con¬tinued. The reason he was fired asPentagon consultant on internation¬al security affairs in the summerof 1965, Morgenthau asserted, wasthat “One highly-placed official in the Pentagon referred to me asa s.o.b. whom they had to get ridof.”“To get support, the Governmentworks by way of discreditation, in¬timidation, or most of all by in¬ducement,” the professor com¬plained.Morgenthau is apart from thegovernment and apart from theNew Left. “I find myself on thefiring line to my own surprise, butI’ve always been a lonely sojournerin the academic world.”UNIVERSITYBARBERSHOP1453 E. 57th ST.FIVE BARBERSWORKING STEADYFLOYD C. ARNOLDproprietor Koga Gift ShopDistinctive Gift Items From TheOrient and Around The World1462 E. 53rd St.Chicago 15, III.MU 4-6856theTEMPTATIONSFRIDAY. FEB. 10th. 1967at Northwestern UniversityMcGraw HallAdmission $3 per personMail Order: TEMPTATIONS c/o Scott Hall Evanston 8:00 pm CINEMACHICAGO AVE AT MICHIGANCannes Prize Winner In Color“A MAN & A WOMAN"Sun-Times * * * *American —"For anyone whose ever been in love."Students $1.25 with I.D. card every daybut Saturday. «Weekdays open 6 pm. Sat. & Sun.open 1:30Most Completeon the South SideMODEL CAMERA £1342 E. 55 ,HY 3-9259NSA DiscountsTHE VIET NAM PROBLEMTODAY & TOMORROW LAW SCHOOL AUDITORIUM. tSEE SCHEDULE ON PAGEJanuary 27, 1967 • CHICAGO MAROON • 3rText of Wick's Statement on House Hourswould not only invite defeat butconcede its likelihood. positive autonomy, nor does it ac¬cord with my invitation printed inthe Maroon on November 18.(Editor's note: The following is theexcerpted text of Dean of StudentsWarner A. Wick’s memorandum tothe Inter-House Council regardingthe proposed visiting hours regula¬tions for nine houses. The textcontains Wick’s reasons for his de¬cisions on the various hours propos¬als.)Of the nine recommendationsconcerning proposed rules for visit¬ing hours that were presented inbehalf of the Inter-House Councilon Monday, January 16, I ampleased to accept your recommen¬dation in seven cases: Blackstone,Chamberlin, Greenwood, Harper,Hitchcock, University, and Vincent.You had approved the proposals ofeach of these houses except Hitch¬cock, which we agree in finding un¬acceptable. Coulter and LowerFlint have since modified their pro¬posals. In their new form I will ac¬cept both if the Council concurs. Inaddition I recommend a minorchange in Harper’s proposal whichI hope will be agreeable to every¬one concerned.• • •WHAT IS not important is wheth¬er some houses may be found tohave "won” more clock hours perweek than others. I recognize that there has perhaps inevitably beenan element of gamesmanship insome of the proposals, and that inconsequence a few of them are inmy opinion extremeI do not believe, for example,that to expand social life to be¬tween two and three o’clock in themorning every day of the week iscompatible with our conception ofourselves as a hard-working Uni¬versity; nor do I believe that morethan a handful of students will usethe privilege except to lay claim toa largely symbolic right, a sort ofstatus symbol.Further, it is probable that someproposals are mere verbal formu¬las, unsupported by true concensusor commitment among those whoinvented them, and are thereforeunlikely to have practical signifi¬cance as principles regulating au¬tonomous societies.BECAUSE OF these hints of fri¬volity or excess, people whosejudgment I respect have advisedme to veto most of the proposals. Ihave not done so for two reasons.The first is that no great prize,such as actual self-governmentwould be, can be achieved withouta measure of faith and courage;and to rebuff these first efforts My second reason is that by notmaking an issue of clock hours assuch we may encourage everyoneto see them in proper relation tothe more important conditions of aform of life in which we can takeboth pride and pleasure.• • •LIKE THE Inter-House Council, Icannot accept Hitchcock’s proposal,although I sympathize with muchthat it says about itself as a com¬munity. The crucial point is theclaim that any common rule what¬ever is an unnecessary infringe¬ment of each individual’s personalfreedom regarding visitors in hisown room—except in so far as hehas a roommate.As a denial, on grounds of ab¬stract freedom, of the responsibili¬ty of the University or any othergroup to maintain internal orderand decorum in Hitchcock, thisdoes not fall within the terms of theInter-House Council’s proposal onPIERRE ANDREFACE FLATTERING CHICSeventeen SkilledHaif Stylists at5242 HYDE PARK BLVD.DO 3-072710% STUDENT DISCOUNT The latter says in part: “TheUniversity as an educational insti¬tution necessarily has a profoundinterest, which it cannot abdicate,in the style of life that prevails onits campus.”I have invited Hitchcock to sub¬mit a new proposal that is notbased on appeals to abstract princi¬ple.COULTER'S original proposalwas much the same except that itgrounded its claim to the privilegesof anarchy on the graduate statusof its members. But status is a mi¬nor consideration. Coulter’s revisedproposal that the house be closed tovisitors of the opposite sex betweenthree and eleven a.m. each day isacceptable if the Council concurs.The following are the house pro¬posals upon which Dean Wick ruled.Chamberlin: noon—3 am, Friday andSaturday: noon—2 . am, otherdays; sign-in sheet; violations tobe handled by a house committee.Vincent: noon—3, Friday and Sat¬urday; noon—2, other days; honorsystem; infractions to be punishedby Vincent House Council.Greenwood: 11—3, Friday and Sat¬urday; 11—midnight, other days;violations punished first by coun¬cil—severe or repeated infractionshandled by the resident head.Harper Surf: 4—Midnight, Monday—Thursday; 4—3. Friday; 1—3, Satur¬day; 1—midnight, Sunday; loungesalways open.Blackstone: 4:30—midnight Monday—Thursday; 4:3Q—3, Friday; noon— The case of Lower Flint is super¬ficially like those of Hitchcock andCoulter, but is really quite differ¬ent. It had not formulated any spe¬cific limits and had delegated aflexible rule-making power to theHouse Council. It had done so, how-ever, not from a desire for unlimit¬ed open hours but for the good rea¬son that it wished to follow thejudgment of its own elected repre¬sentatives rather than join thegame of competitve rule-stretchingThe Council found fault withLower Flint’s proposal because itexcluded any external review orcheck except through the exerciseof the Resident Head’s veto ofHouse Council action. After a use¬ful discussion with me, the houseagreed to accept a specific limitfor visiting hours and chose the ex¬treme one selected by Chamberlinand Vincent because if offered soslight a temptation to exploit it.3, Saturday; noon—1, Sunday; sign-in shoe*; enforced by council and,if infractions are servere, by resid¬ent head.University: noon—10, Sunday—Thurs¬day; noon—2;30 Friday and Satur¬day; common rooms—all day.Hitchcock: no restrictions; forma¬tion of a committee (housing staffand residents) to consider griev¬ances.Coulter: no restrictions because oftheir status as graduate studentsover 20. aU living in singlesLower Flint: decisions should bemade by House Council in majori¬ty vote and subject to veto of resi¬dent head.Lower Flint revised: as above withthese limits: Sunday—Thursday, notmore than noon—2; Friday andSaturday, not more than noon—3Coulter revised: 11—3, all days.DR. AARON ZIMBLER, OptometristIN THENEW HYDE PARK SHOPPING CENTER1510 E. 55th St.DO 3-7644 DO 3-6866EYE EXAMINATIONSPRESCRIPTIONS FILLED CONTACT LENSESNEWEST STYLING IN FRAMESStudant and Faculty Discount New. Revised Hours Schedule In Effect"' * f * 'WITH THI VERY BEST AND FRESHESTFISH AND SEAFOODH. 1-2S70, PL 2-8190, 00 3-9186 1340 I. 38r8CLEAN SWEEP SALEWith nearly two months of frigid Chicagoweather still ahead, now is the time to sparkup your wardrobe at special sale prices.Write these flattering basic fashions info yourwinter script.Corduroy skirts and slacksHeather Mist wool skirts and sweatersSolid color skirtsCardigan, pull-over and turtle neck sweatersShift style dresses and jumpersTwo piece wool suitsTwo piece knit suitsAll blouses in our stock, prints and solid colors.20% DiscountGift DepartmentThe Universiy of Chicago Bookstore5802 Ellis Avenue TOAD HALL SELLSAMPEX TAPE RECORDERS AND DECKS . . .TWO OF WHICH ARE ON SALE!AMPEX Model 850 3-speed qucrner-track deck.WAS $249.95 Is $1999sAMPEX Model 1150 3-speed quarter-track deck.WAS $379.95 Is $2999SThis machine reverses on playback, and can beset to repeat tapes - either pre-recorded or yourown recordings.All Ampex tape recorders and decks have a fullone-year parts and labor warranty.This sale is for a limited time only. Any ordersploced during the sale will be honored at thesale price.• • • ’ / - i - ■ ' ■ " ■We are now stockingDYNACO B&O TAPE DECKS1444 E. 57th ST. 752-8100Cal Student Reaction to Kerr Dismissal lacked Basic Understanding'Mmmmm..just lovebasketballplayers.#»**•«< "C«kt" an W4»-m»rk» wklik Mtntlfy «nly th« prtdvct «f Tk« (tca-Ctl* CtmpanfAnd they lova Coca-Cola on overy campu*. Coca-Cola ha* tho taste you neverget tired of...always refreshing. That’* why thing* go better with Coke.#.ofterCoke.«. after Coke,Continues To Mount—UCLA Daily BruinUnfavorable reaction of University of California studentsand faculty to the dismissal of President Clark Kerr by theschool’s Regents last Friday, continues to mount, according toAllan Mann, literary editor of the UCLA Daily Bruin.UCLA professor of chemistry,K.N. Trueblood has stated, “Kerris a symbol of the greatness of theUniversity. I don’t believe it’s pos¬sible to get anyone better thanKerr. A replacement would have tobe someone quite different.”Roger Howard, a law studentand chairman of the Board of Con¬trol at UCLA, which dispenses allmoney for “incidental fee” (suchas fees for the Student Health Serv¬ice), stated that Kerr’s dismissalindicated “the lack of knowledgethat the Regents and Reagan haveconcerning education.“Kerr has carried this Universityfar in a relatively short amount ofttme." Howard continued. “HU ab¬sence will no doubt level the Uni¬versity to a second-rate institu¬tion.”The undergraduate president ofUCLA. Bob Michaels, warned at arally of 8.000 students on Monday, that the Regents’ action is the “cul¬mination of events leading to thedownfall of this greatest of univer¬sities in the world.” He then calledfor the formation of a CaliforniaFederation of Students to organize(Continued on Page Eleven)Streeter To LectureAt Law AuditoriumRobert E. Streeter, dean of thedivision of the humanities and pro¬fessor of english, will speak on“The Teaching of Humanities,1991" on Monday, January 30.The lecture will begin at 8 pm inthe auditorium of the Law School.It is the sixth lecture in a seriessponsored by the Graduate Schoolof Education. Admission is free. Von Mises on Marx and Engels“Karl Marx lacked a basicunderstanding of the capitalistprocess,” remarked Ludwigvon Mises, Professor of Eco¬nomics at N.Y.U. in a lecture on“100 years of Marxian socialism”Tuesday night.His talk at Breasted Hall wassponsored by Student Government.Von Mises added that present-day socialists will never imple¬ment their nationalization pro¬grams where they have gained apolitical majority in Europe, forfear of economic collapse. Even so,Von Mises noted that “future histo¬rians may well call the past hun¬dred years the Era of Marx.”VON MISES explained thatMarx’s theory of capitalism, whichstates that a greater and greaterproportion of the capitalist societywill sink into poverty until the sys¬tem ends by revolution, is erro¬neous. The basic principle of capi¬talist production, he said, is pro¬duction for the mass market. Thericher classes did not partake of industrially produced goods untilfairly recently, so the system isprimarily beneficial to the lowerclasses whom it is supposed toharm, he concluded.Von Mises questioned the consist¬ency of Marx and Engels on thematter of ideology. Noting that thetwo writers were both of bourgeoisbackground, he cast doubt on theirtheory that ideology is determinedby social class. Marx and Engels,he noted, tried to justify their his¬torical oddity in the CommunistManifesto.HERE, HE said, they noted thata few especially enlightened mem¬bers of the bourgeois would seetheir days numbered, and defect tothe workers.Von Mises asserted that social¬ism can lead only to economic ca-tastrophy. He explained that the ef¬ficiency of the post office, essen¬ tially the same as a “socialisticeconomy” in the words of Lenin,would be greatly inferior to that ofthe free market.“GOVERNMENT-OWNED enter¬prises in this country are charac¬teristically less efficient than priv¬ate ones,” he continued. Notingthat the New York City subways,as a private corporation, wereable to maintain a five cent fare,he observed that the system is nowmuch less efficient. The fares gethigher and higher, and the serv¬ices get worse and worse, headded.Von Mises pointed out that Euro¬pean economic losses due to social¬ism are paid off by U. S. capitalis¬tic profits. “State-owned railwaysand telephone companies lose mon¬ey,” he said, “which U. S. foreignaid makes up.”AN ANTI-WAR COMMERCIAL ON WCFL?Social justice only becomes social reality in the U.S. when publicopinion is mobilized. The broadcasting media can help to moldpublic opinion. If you are interested in influencing public opinionin a liberal direction on the War in Viet Nam — via the massmedia — as part of a nationwide effort to inform the public thensend for information or your contributions to University Studentsand Professors for Social Action No. 332, 1005 E. 60th, Chicago.An organizational meeting will be held Mon., Jan. 30, at 7:00 p.m.in Ida Noyes East Lounge.LYSISTRATAARISTOPHANESDIRECTED BY JAMES O'REILLYUNIVERSITY THEATREMANDEL HALL57TH AT UNIVERSITY8:30 PMFEBRUARY 3-4-5FRIDAY $2.00SATURDAY $2.50SUNDAY $1.75STUDENT-FACULTY DISCOUNT 50cCALL Ml 3-0800 - EX 3581Ac authority Th. Coca-Cola Compaq by, COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF CHICAGO. CHICAGO, ILL. January 27, 1967 • CHICAGO MAROON • 5David L AikenMorality andGood Business The Bank Conflict RaisesMany Important IssuesThe officials of the Continental Illinois National Bank haveresponded to the criticism of their policy of loaning money toSouth Africa by maintaining that moral consderations can¬not interfere with economic decisions.The obvious implication is that if the economy of the worldis to function at all it is necessary for each to pursue his ownbest economic interests and the result, to cite Adam Smith, bythe workings of an invisible hand, will amount to the greatestgood for all.THIS KIND OF reasoning gives banks like the ContinentalIllinois National Bank and corporations like the United FruitCompany and the Anaconda Copper Company an easy excusefor not considering the social consequences of their economicdecisions. It also, however, provides a basis for arguing againsteconomic decisions like the one to take advantage of the cheapblack labor of South Africa.Fulgencio Batista never had any trouble in his relations withAmerican corporations or banks or tourists or State Depart¬ment officials. Many believe that without their support Batis¬ta’s regime couldn’t have possibly lasted as long as it did.No American corporation stopped to consider that it wasprofitting from a brutal and dehumanizing social situationwhich its desire for easy profit helped maintain. Was thissound economic judgement? It was—for a while. But in thelong run, the reasoning proved very unsound indeed.The Cuban people didn’t forget the role of American bigbusiness in perpetuating one of the most indescribably barbar¬ic regimes of our time. When the forces of the Revolution werevictorious they exappropriated American businesses in Cuba.AMERICAN CORPORATE executives didn’t consider intheir economic calculations that people cannot be exploitedforever. Many people can and will be exploited for a very long jtime, but not forever. A variety of quite separate is¬sues has been discussed in re¬sponse to SDS's effort to get theUniversity to withdraw accountsfrom a bank which has lent mon¬ey to South Africa. SDS's attitudetoward students' role in formula¬tion of certain University policiesdoes not stand or fall with its ar¬guments on the best way to com¬bat apartheid.It is the topic of the relationbetween University students andUniversity trustees that interestsus today.OUR TEXT for today's sermon isdrawn from Tuesday’s the epis¬tles of James Redfield, Master ofthe New Collegiate Division, andChauncy Harris, Professor of Ge¬ography.Both gentlemen seem to see thesame apocalyptic vision, or“nightmare” in Harris’s term, inwhich “the separate categories ofstudents, faculty, administration,board of trustees, and the publicinterpenetrate one another andbecome merged.” If students tryto tell trustees how to manage fi¬nances, both writers ash, whyshouldn't trustees tell studentsand everybody else how to runtheir affairs?A beginning of an answer lies inthe students’ feeling that certainsocial and poiicital situationsraise moral issues which are“their affair”—and everybodyelse’s. Apartheid is such a moralissue.Casting about for a means ofexpressing their moral repug¬nance of apartheid, the studentshit upon something close athand—banks which loan money to the South African government. Bycircumstance, one of these bankshandles the University’s accounts.University financial matters aresupervised by a committee of thetrustees; one of the trustees is anofficer of the bank. Thus, hit thetarget closest to home and youcan at least demonstrate yourmoral indignation, and maybeeven arouse thought and. in time,action.IN THIS case, then, the stu¬dents are approaching the trust¬ees about a matter which only in¬directly affects the operation ofthe University itself. The studentsare acting more in their role ofconcerned individuals, attemptingto bring some sort of pressure tobear upon private organizationswhose policies they question.The trustees form the Universi¬ty’s primary official ties with“the outside world.” They arerepresentatives of the public tothe University, and vice versa.Their main concerns are indicat¬ed by the names of the commit¬tees in which their work is largelydone—budget, investment, busi¬ness administration, and nomina¬tions committees.SDS’s main line of appeal to thetrustees is based on feelings ofmorals. The students are askingthe trustees to consider the Uni¬versity’s patronage of the Conti¬nental Illinois National Bank inmoral terms.Where does that leave the prob¬lem of “interpenetration” of roleswithin the University?MORAL concerns have a placein public policy and private ac¬tion. The trustees are representa¬ tives of the public; they are menwith moral standards (presuma¬bly); and they have responsibilityfor the private action of this insti¬tution. Why shouldn’t one groupwith an interest in the moral as¬pects of this institution’s policiesaddress those responsible for suchpolicies? Would this somehowbring chaos and anarchy to theorderly world along the Midway?We think not.We think part of the problem isa result primarily of unnecessaryrestrictions on communication between students and trustees. Whyshouldn’t the board hold publicsessions at least occasionally9Why shouldn’t the chairman follow the lead of the President bydelivering a State of the Universi¬ty address now and then? Thetrustees are interested in the Uni¬versity’s public posture: so arethe students. Why not bring themtogether?THE UNIVERSITY is not a representative body. It does not express the opinions of a majorityof its members. There is—at present—no way for the rank and file(students and faculty) to imposeany viewpoint on the leadership,nor vice versa. This is entirely asit should be.Things are not as they shouldbe, however, if there is no way toat least express concern over theconsequences of the University’sactions to those responsible forthem. To deny students the opportunity for such communication isto deny them their role as moralgadflies—a role which could be effective even on trustees.Eventually the hardships of their lives will make even themost intimidated peoples fight for a better way.There may be rich profits for American business in SouthAfrica and there may be profits for years to come. But one daythings will begin to change, just as they began to change inCuba, changed in Algeria, are changing in Vietnam; and thenthe economic decisions that did not include any moral consid¬erations will prove to have been not so economic after all. News AnalysisMaroon Reporter ViewsBank Sit-in from the InsideWHEN THAT DAY comes maybe people like the trustees ofthe Continental Illinois National Bank will wish that they hadused their influence to work for moderation—when it was stillpossible.Thru the StormFor a newspaper the most important thing is that it comeout. The next most important thing is that it come out on time.Some say it takes a disaster to prove how good a paper is.Who wasn’t impressed when the New York Times hit the news¬stand during the New York City blackout.FOR THE MAROON, yesterday’s storm was the equivalentof the New York blackout. Dispatches were completely fouledup, copy didn’t arrive at the printers until hours later thandeadline, and one little Volkswagon filled with the Maroonshop crew almost didn’t make it.Drifts are rough on VW’s and every street had a new one.Within throwing distance of the print shop the Maroon crewwas Marooned for good - or so it seemed. Caught in over a footof snow one particular editor known for his volatile temper-ment started to cry, another noted for his cool composure start¬ed to laugh.THEN TWO GUYS from the neighborhood came out of no¬where and offered to help. For almost twenty minutes in freez¬ing cold and raging winds the four of them fought with thatlittle car, nudging it inch by inch and finally lifting it (don’tkid yourself, a Volkswagen is heavy) out of the snowbank.At this juncture, it’s not clear whether the Maroon willmake it out on time tomorrow, but if we do and you find yourmorning coffee a little more pleasant for having us around,you can thank those two fellows, whoever they were. by Rob SkeistI’m not the kind of reporter whowould go to jail just to get a story.But I was disgusted withapartheid, angry with the bankfor its defense of amorality, sym¬pathetic with the demonstration Iwas covering for the Maroon, andannoyed by the sneering lookfrom a police officer.I didn’t debate his assumptionthat I had been part of the sit-in,and at that moment joined the 23other protestors. We were quicklytaken to jail.Paddy-wagon spirit was veryhigh. We introduced ourselves,talked, sang, and admired thespeaker system carrying our con¬versation to the front of the wag¬on. Paul Booth and Chris Hobsonbragged of their participation in asimilar SDS protest at the ChaseManhattan Bank in New YorkCity.HOBSON TOLD US about theconversation he had with Conti¬nental Illinois National Bank’svice-president for internationalloans, who would not deny thatthe Bank would trade “with theDevil himself” if he paid cash.Then Hobson settled back to readsome Trotsky.At the police station, the fourgirls were taken to one floor, andthe twenty boys to another. Wewere led without much commentto a cell (the first of several)measuring about seven feet bynine feet. There were two built-inwooden benches, a toilet, a sink,and autographs of previousguests.The twenty of us were constant¬ly regrouped. There were policemen all overthe place. At first many of themlooked suspicious, as if we weregoing to try to escape. Later wehad casual conversations withsome of them. While many of thepolice at the demonstration itselfwere Negro, almost all them atthe station—clerks and adminis¬trators, it seemed—were white.WE WERE TAKEN throughvarious rooms, asked basic ques¬tions such as age, place of birth,and address. We emptied ourpockets and got finger-printed andphotographed. After that thetwenty of us waited in two cellsfor about three hours. While wewaited our fingerprints weresent to Washington to be checkedby an FBI computer system, apoliceman told us.We spent the time singing, talk¬ing, playing hearts with two decksof cards, playing Botticelli, touch¬ing our toes, and eating dinner:two bologna sandwiches eachwashed down with somestrange-tasting water.Provisions for bail were madeand we left at about 8 pm afterabout 6 hours in jail.THERE HAD BEEN a goodturn-out at the demonstration thatafternoon. At 12:30 there wereabout 80 marchers on LaSalle Stand Jackson Blvd., in front of thebank. By 2 pm there were over200 marchers.Most of the demonstrators werequite neat. Many of the boys worejackets and ties. Most were UCstudents or phone on theirlunch hours. This didn’t preventhecklers from sneering, “Go takea bath” and “Don’t you have anything better to do? Why don’tyou get a job?”THE SPIRIT OF the crowd thatgathered was hard to define.Some joined the marchers, somesmiled and walked by, some re¬fused literature, some assuredeach other that the whole thingwas just to stir up trouble.“You’re definitely wrong.You’re making asses of your¬selves,” one kindly gentlemantold me when I asked for his opin¬ion. This WASP attorney wassoon joined by a Jewish store-owner, who agreed that there’snothing wrong with keeping theblack people down. Behold theforces of ecumenism.At 1:15, 23 marchers sat down,midway between the bank’s doorand the street curb. Some of themlocked arms. Hobson made astatement to the press. They sang“We Shall Not Be Moved."An officer, obviously of high rank,told them that the sit-in wasblocking pedestrian traffic. At thesame time, another officer wastelling the pedestrians that any¬one who wanted to pass by coulddo so. Only a few people trickledthrough the path, which wasabout four feet wide. Evidentlyfew of the pedestrians wanted toleave at auch an exciting mo¬ment; this wae the real reasonthe sidewalks were jammed.At least twenty policemengathered around the demonstra¬tors in the sit-in. Then came thepaddy wagons. The marcherswere singing and chanting. At2:03, after reaching the climax,they quickly dispersed.CHICAGO MAROON • January 27, 1967For centuries, the literature ofGermany has been driven by an in¬tellectuality at once dynamic andentirely isolated from social activi¬ty. There were, of course, the samesoggy masterpieces of popular cul¬ture. written by the Teutonic equiv¬alents of Richardson and Sir WalterScott. But Germany has always hadprofound reverence for the scholar,an awe for his very towering dis¬tance from earthly concerns, un¬matched in Europe or the UnitedStates. Here, where scholars arecanonized only for their pragmaticcontributions — sanctified in theglow of the second-stage rocket —it is difficult to conceive of an au¬thor as both esthete and culture-hero But the contrary is true ofGermany, and for this reason themetaphysical has often outweighedthe phvsical in German literature.Nietzsche, Mann, and Rilke: theseare masters of a form which rejectsboth the mundanitv of extreme na-t u r a 1 i s m and the uncontrolleddreaming of surrealism. Instead,they have created a literature ofvivid complexity and universal hu¬manity. F.ven in Brecht, the revolu¬tionary. we see an uberwelt of alle¬gory. while contemporary Germanpoets have been described as “find¬ing reality only in the syntheticprocess of artistic creation.”But the novel in post-war Ger¬many has not continued in the stepsof such visionary authors as Her¬mann Hesse. The Marshall Planseems rather to have affected morethan the reconstruction of an econo¬my. If Uwe Johnson's latest novel.Two Views, may be considered anadequate representative, we maylook for refractions of our own im¬age in current German literature.There is the same highly profession¬al control of technique, which wide¬ly skirts the line dividing geniusfrom insanity. There is total lackof daring in questions of form,and psychological insight is zealous¬ly revealed without becoming re¬vealing.For most readers, the book willbe at fault for its lack of contempor¬ary interest. The dramatic core ofthe novel is the erection of the Ber¬lin wall — a drama which has al¬ready been re-enacted in every form from poem to puppet extrava¬ganza. Even in Germany itself, thewall has lost much of its tragic fas¬cination. The most serious readingand the most heated discussion nowcenters on Karl Jaspers, the pioneerexistentialist, and his study of thegrowth of neo-Nazism. Internationaltension is aroused by this newlyPrussian aspect in West Germanpolitics; the world has a raw memo¬ry of what a truly potent Germanycould do.Against this emotional back¬ground, Uwe Johnson has troublearousing much of the proper sympa¬thy. This would cause no problem ifthe occasion of the novel weremerely that — a means of launch¬ing the narrative. But Two Viewsdepends greatly upon the fear and pity which the Berlin constructiononce evoked. The building of thewall is the motivating force behindcomplete transformations of charac¬ter —it is the power which definesthe separate “views” of the book’stitle. But the wall is vaguely de¬fined throughout the novel. The au¬thor relies on the audience’s memo¬ry of horror—and this modernmemory is a battleground for fartoo many horrors.Two Views is a novel saturatedwith place as well as situation; thistoo is neither explained nor tran¬scended. Street names, are contin¬ually dropped before the reader,without further illumination. In theearly stages of the book, before theimprisonment of the East Germans,it is difficult to know whether the setting is East or West. Perhaps it isthe author’s intention to show thereal unity of Germany, uneffectedby political divisions until the lineis forcibly drawn. Yet there is somedistinction between the capitalistand communist regimes even at theinception of the novel, a distinctionwhich the audience is expected au¬tomatically to apply to the namesFriedrichshain and Charlottenburg.And without some background inthe geography of Berlin, this kindof automatic response is impossible.Part of this loss undoubtablyarises from barriers of translation—after all, German natives couldhardly be expected to feel the fullromance of street names in Manhat-ten. The publisher has tried to over¬come the problem by printing amap of Berlin inside the fly papersof Johnson’s book, which helps thereader who is willing to leaf to thecover every third page.(continued on page two)■ •••TABLE OF CONTENTSAesthetics:f Forms and Substances in the_ Arts, by Etienne Gilson 7£i ifBiography:Thomas Woodrow Wilson, bySigmund Freud and WilliamC. Bullitt 12'Fiction:Baloons are Available, byJordan Crittenden 5*Digging Out, by Anne Richard¬son 5> The Ravishing of Lol Stein, byMarguerite Duras 5vThe Riot, by Frank Elli 3m§: Sauve Qui Peut, by LawrenceDurrell 2'■§ Two Views, by Uwe Johnson 1i The Woman with the LittleFox, by Violette Leduc — 4| History:History of the Chicago UrbanLeague, by Arvarh E. Strick¬land . ... . W |Letters:Letters of C.S. Lewis, editedI by W. H. Lewis •Paperback Playback 11% Social Comment: :N-I Division Street: America, byStuds Terkel . 4i A Prophetic Minority, by JackNewfield f \1 " $ iiA Strange lozenge—Shaped AffairSauve Qui Pent, by Lawrence Dur-rell. E. P. Dutton & Co. $3.50.Lawrence Durrell’s facility withlanguage was obvious from thestart. And now that the deificationof The Alexandria Quartet is nearlycomplete, Durrell is free to play.His reputation is secure enough; heis no longer obligated to be pro¬found or boring, sexy or “in.” Thisnew little book of stories is there¬fore striking for its lack of preten¬sion. It makes no attempt at Sal-ingerian “sincerity,” nor at Goldin-gian “social comment.” Its humor isnever “black.” But is is very funny.And those readers who must findsocial comment, sex or sincerity intheir fiction will find them here—not, however, in the form of asticky, synthetic frosting. This lilyain’t gilt; Nat Hentoff would find ita bore. I can think of no betterrecommendation.The nine stories are told in thefirst person by Antrobus—a highlyeducated caveman. He is a carica¬ture of the minor official in theBritish foreign service who has im¬peccable manners, the training “tobe equal to any emergency almost,”the characteristic obtuseness asso¬ciated with English butlers in oldmovies, and no sanity whatever. Heis a gentleman.The Twain(continued from page one)But all these complaints arisefrom what seems to me to be a cen-t r a 1 “unconsciousness” in TwoViews. The details of plot and char¬acter are disgorged from ratherthan assimilated into the livingbody of the book. Symbols, such asa lost sports-car and the Berlin wallitself, seem to slip, without recogni¬tion, through the fingers of the au¬thor. Even obvious dualities in thebook’s structure — two Germanies,two lovers as equal protagonists,the opposition of town and country¬side — these are rarely extended tothe point of artistry.This same unconsciousness is ex¬pressed in the psychology of thecentral characters — A Pyramisand Thisbe faced with their own“cursed wall.” But the Easternnurse Beate and the Western Pho¬tographer Dietbert are a most hesi¬tant pair of lovers. They have slepttogether, but not often, and spentremarkably little time togetherwhile it was politically permitted.Only when their separation is en¬forced do Beate and Dietbert tum¬ble into the business of loving oneanother. It is a love constructed bycasting them into the classic rolesof masculinity and femininity. Shebecomes passive, a damsel muchdistressed, only when the wall isbuilt to surpress her native activityand independence. He, in turn,looks on the Berlin wall as a chival-ric challenge. They are lovers only Durrell’s technique is to buildAntrobus’s stories by creating richpatterns of detail. There seem to befew “stories” in the conventionalsense of the word, but actuallythere is a variety of them undereach title. In “Seraglios and Im¬broglios,” for example, there is noreal plot; the story consists of a se¬ries of anecdotes, each funnier thanthe preceding one, and the wholeforming a structure which ultimate¬ly focuses on a kind of sterile sexu¬ality and absurd religion: “likewhen Polk-Mowbray decided tobuild a Marxist chapel in the Em¬bassy grounds to try and weaneveryone from BarrenMaterialism. . . .The style was sortof Primrose Hill Wesleyan.” Theentire story has something of a mo¬saic effect, but it has a greater uni¬ty, it is more dazzling, and thepieces interpenetrate. The collec¬tion is something like those weirdlyexaggerated models of cells atthe Museum of Science andIndustry—grotesque and beautifuland unbelievable. There is some¬thing inherently comic in the styleof the things.Everything about these stores—situations, names, characters,plots—is improbable. But Durrellsucceeds in building a private worldof diplomatic nonsense, justified byShall Meetwhen a vast “order of things” de¬fines them as such. Friends who be¬moan the grief Dietbert feels on hisseparation are the actual cause ofhis affection. The lovers are “littlepeople,” but they are anti-heroeswithout perception of either the he¬roic or the void. There is no scath¬ing sense of absurdity which com¬pels their action, only a mild dis¬comfort. In the end, Beate’s escapeis accomplished with a healthysense of functional success, whileDietbert receives a senseless andineffective punishment for his ownsense of impotency.Not until page 180, of this 183page book, is the narrator revealedas particular and individual. Thislate introduction of the persona isso clumsy that I wonder if TwoViews is based upon “actual experi¬ence.” The author states Beate’scommand, “But you must make upeverything you write!” To this, theauthor replies, “It is made up.” Per¬haps. But it is certainly not “madeup” enough. Uwe Johnson has halt¬ed along the path of imaginationleading to creative fiction, yet hasnot maintained the artistic indiffer¬ence of the cinema verite. Like toomuch current American fiction,Two Views is trapped by materialdetail without a strong commitmentto either fiction or fact.Elizabeth WissmanMiss Wisstnan is a fourth-year studentmajoring in English at The Universityof Michigan. the fact that “a dip’s life is never asclear cut as the Wars of the Roses,”which has a logic of its own. Hisprimary unifying device is the char¬acter of Antrobus. And in spite ofthe fact that Antrobus is a carica¬ture, Durrell is able to make himseem real. In the first story, for ex¬ample, the Kurdish Embassy (an“up-and-coming little country witha rapidly declining economy”) in¬vites the British to a “joyful” cir¬cumcision ceremony. Antrobus de¬scribes their collective response:You can imagine the long slow wailthat went up in the Chancery whenfirst this intelligence was broughthome to us. Circumcision! Joyfully!Refreshments! “By God. here is astrange lozenge-shaped affair!”cried De Mandeville, and he wasright.Everything is seen through Antro¬bus’s unlikely eyes; and as he grad¬ually comes alive, as detail is addedto detail, as his absurdity becomesconsistent, the other characters andthe events themselves become be¬lievable. Not that the character de¬scriptions lack much:You remember Drage? Of courseyou do. Yes, here we are truly inthe field of Revealed Religion. Allthat winter the Visions had beengaining on him, the Voices hadbeen whispering seditious info, intohis faun-like ears .... FinallyDrage was forced to ask for relig¬ious help from the leader of hissec t—a Nonconformist preachercalled Fly-Fornication Wilkinson.He was a tall spindly man with agoatee and huge goggles. . . . Wecould all see that the fellow had amushroom-shaped psyche. Hisvoice was deep and boomy with anoccasional scream like a policewhistle on the word “sin” whichmade one sit up and metaphorical¬ly spurn the gravel with one’shooves.Durrell’s humor in these storiesranges from quiet wit to Chaplines-que slapstick. In “What-ho on theRialto,” Antrobus tells of the effectof a female ambassador (fromFrance of course) on his colleagueDe Mandeville and on the ItalianHead of Chancery, “Bonzo di Por-co”:She flattered Bonzo, making himshow off his talents where some¬one more intelligent might havepersuaded him to leave them inthe napkin. He played, for ex¬ample, the flute better, louder thanDe Mandeville. His pout was pro¬fessional, his puff serene and notwavery like that of his rival. Apartfrom this, he played a blazinggame of shuttlecock. He had ac¬tually once had leprosy. . . .The story reaches its high point in afree-for-all Laurel and Hardy me¬lee, complete with swords and cos¬tumes. Finally, the lady goes toRussia, where “she liked the place,the people, and the system so muchthat she had herself nationalizedand married a collective farm.”It is a complete gas to find a writ¬er who is able to continue experi¬menting without becoming, atthe same time, “what’shappening”. . .baby. These storiesare not great—they were not meantto be—but they are all good. And itis amusing to think that Durrell canwrite potboilers better than, say, S. J. Perelman’s latest pieces in theNew Yorker. I imagine Durrellreading all the magazines, and thensending them just the rightstories—with prices attached. “ACorking Evening,” of course, goesto Playboy. “What-ho on the Rial¬to,” fun for women, goes to Mad¬emoiselle, “The Little Affair inParis,” which is about nothing inparticular, goes to The SaturdayEvening Post. It is as if Pursewar-den, with characteristic absurdity,had outlived his own suicide,changed his name, and set out towrite his memoirs. Of course, this isnot so much Pursewarden as a sortof diplomaticized version of him,and his motives are not so much lit¬erary as they are an extension ofthe art of diplomacy. The put-on isvalued for its own sake; the art ofbeing a gentleman is valued aboveall others. And a gentleman’s firstrequirement is cash: thus the bookBut the book surpasses the quali¬ty of magazine comedy, mainly because of a certain feeling of “multi¬ple personality” that permeates allof Durrell’s work—a feeling whichseems to require a similar multipleresponse from his readers. SauveQui Peut is obviously not Durrell’sbest work, but it would be a mistaketo measure a book of light comedyby the standards of Durrell's mostcomplex novels. And still the bookfits rather neatly into an opuswhich becomes more attractive witheach new addition. There may be“plenty more where it came from,”as De Mandeville says of his labori¬ously gathered morning dew\ butthat does not make it any less worthhaving. The book is one of thoseJamesian “pleasant hours,” which iscomplete in itself, but is at the sametime only part of Durrell’s largerand infinitely more important work.Michael I. MillerMr. Miller is a fourth-year student ma¬joring in English at Roosevelt Univer¬sity.The Chicago Literary ReviewEditors-in-chief: . Edward W. Hearn#Bry«n R. DunlapExacutive Editor: . David H. RichtarAdvertising Manager: . Wayne MayerArt Editor Bob GriessIllinois Teacher's CollageEditor: Arthur ChickLake Forest Editor: . .J. Greg GerdelLoyola Editor: Bill ClohesyMichigan Editor: Liz WissmanRoosevelt Editor: Mike MillerValparaiso Editor: Janet KarstenWooster Editor Don KennedyEditorial Staff: Gretchen WoodMary Sue LeightonEllen WilliamsThe Chicago Literary Review, circulation45,000, is published six times per yearunder the auspices of the University ofChicago. It is distributed by the ChicagoMaroon, The Illinois Teacher’s College(South Campus) Tempo, The WoosterVoice, the Lake Forest Stentor, and Val¬paraiso Torch. Reprint rights have beengranted to the Michigan DaUy, the Roose¬velt Torch and the Loyola News. Editorialoffices: 1*12 E. 5»h Street. Chicago, Illinois60637. Subscriptions: $2.50 per year. Copy¬right© 1967 by The Chicago LiteraryReview. All rights reserved.2 • CHICAGO LITERARY REVIEW • February, 1967Paul Bunyan Behind Prison BarsThe Riot, by Frank Elli. Coward-McCann. $4.95.To a reading public that likes itsliterature either hot or in coldblood, Frank Elli’s modest escapethriller promises little. His prisonriot is more a con-style carnival-in-the-carnal than a bloody rampageof vandalism. No one gets killed ormaimed in the two days of confusedjubilation, and with touching ironyElli shows that his inmates really donot know what to do with theirbrief freedom. But neither does theauthor. Like a benny hangover, aheadachy boredom follows the un¬certain anticipation of big kids in acandy store. The riot progresses tothe expected conclusion, as Elli canrescue neither his fellow cons norhis readers from the stale taste of astale plot.But Elli writes with directnessand precision, like a TV cameramanastride a dolly behind his maincharacter, he photographs a clear -if transparent - outline of action.His mania for detail does not hinderswift plot movement; he skillfullymakes us unaware of his art withwords. To his credit, the two ac¬tion-packed days are tautlystretched into 255 pages of livelydescription holding our attentionthroughout. In the pandemonium ofseventeen hundred rioting inmates,Elli does not flounder, although thishandy manipulation of interlockingdetails is an attribute of Elli’s prom¬ising style rather than a tour deforce of ingenious plotmaking.Beginnings are ordinarily diffi¬cult. Elli uses a common stylisticdevice to introduce his riot: “On thesurface it was a lazy Monday morn¬ ing in the State Penitentiary.” Ofcourse, something is brewing, and itain’t just illegal greenpotato beer.By the second inch of print, Elli’sempathy is clear. “Cully Briston, atall, muscular man in his late twen¬ties, stood alone on the shoplinewalk.” We can relax; we can identi¬fy. We need not stretch our imagi¬nations below the surface: Elli willoffer us a shallow pot of common¬place psychological responses forthe terrible mystery of self which,in other recent novels, wears on ournerves so. He will whitewash andblackeye his characters so we needno Sherlock lens to spy out hiddenfingerprints. And he will give usOur Man: Cully Briston, with theunmistakable twin bluebirds tat¬tooed on his manly chest; CullyBriston, fountain of respect andmanhood, convicted for “one lousybeer-joint robbery,” which isn’treally so bad; Cully, who grufflyvows he is no Boy Scout, but afterall can’t help feeling nausea atbaby-rapers, queens, screws, snitchkites, and wardens—quite right.And quite real is Elli’s second iro¬ny—that Cully in the end is ridi¬culed by those who formerly re¬spected him: just because he saveda warden’s life, and for sound rea¬sons too. And ain’t that life? Cullynever learns.Although Elli may be angling forprison reform, he maintains thepublic’s conception of hardenedcriminals by overworking his all¬stock cast of characters. There arenotably “Rick, the Reformatorytransfer” and Surefoot, the shiv-happy Indian made into a psychot¬ic murderer by prison beatings andtear gassings. While reproducing in fiction the TV type of criminal, Elliturns around to ridicule the verypublic he satisfies. Concerned citi¬zens crowd into the lobby and linethe prison walls, pushing andstretching with the notorious publicthirst for violence. The radio an¬nouncer, herald of public opinion,ominously broadcasts the emergen¬cies of “seventeen hundred riotinginmates” (who are only breakinginto contraband benny supplies,brewing raisinjack, and stealingeggs to remember what they tastelike) and treats the demands of“hardened criminals” with an in¬sensitivity of a more insidious type.The final doublecross of prison offi¬cials is a telling contast to Cully’strust and promise keeping; yet foran American public that readily (ifbriefly) sympathizes with victims ofpolice brutality, Elli’s revelation ofthis truth through journalistic fic¬tion is hardly an important excusefor his book.Tough-guy talk is ripped off pageafter page with almost laughableconsistency. This is appropriate fora tough-guy novel, but there is somuch of it here that the book mightbe seen as a dictionary for eagerdelinquent readers - and nothingmore. For more sheltered readers,Elli delicately explains his terms(such as why the queens sashay withlimp wrists) with a quasi-PTAsense of decency. The near-vio¬lence, the subtle crudities, thebland swearing are all displayedas if to remind us these are pris¬oners, but to shock us only a little.There are moments of sympathet¬ic emotion. Cully forgives an oldenemy and invites him to share in the stashed raisinjack. Briston playsbig brother to Skinny, the youngwife-killer who really can’t beblamed if his wife was also a whore.Before troopers move in to reclaimthe wrecked prison, Cully pentitent-ly soliloquizes in the shower:Never had he felt so alone in theworld . . . No doubt about it, hehad screwed up but good. All theway down the line, The Man, play¬ing the role, throwing his weightaround . . . giving orders like afourteen-carat chump. Aw, Christ,it was always the same, lookingback and regretting, the goddamnstory of his life.After this, the hated WardenGrossman, who had been taken hos¬tage, recovers from his feignedheart attacks to muscle Cully backinto Isolation, where the riot hadfirst turned loose. Same time, samechannel, the novel goes out where itcame in with a nice, round feel tothings even if nothing came in be¬tween. Frank Elli’s exclusive storyof the ways and wiles of convictshas utilized a tightly controlled andhard-hitting style upon a sadlydog-earned plot without attemptingthat literary magic of transformingthe commonplace into the special,the justifiable. As in televisionthrillers, little is left to the reader’satrophied imagination—except towonder just what the book is for. Ifyou will, a pragmatic suggestion: tothose of us with well-used night ta¬bles, Elli has given another novel toplace next to all the murder mys¬teries. And for that, the insomniacsof the nation can be grateful.Dana KristenMr. Kristen is a fourth-year studentmajoring in political science and Eng¬lish at Valparaiso University.February, 1967 • CHICAGO LITERARY REVIEW • 3The Transcendental FoxThe Woman with the Little Fox, byViolette Leduc, translated by DerekColtman. Farrar, Strauss, and Gi¬roux, Inc. $4.95.Violette Ledue is not the Frenchequivalent of Virginia Woolf, yetThe Woman with the Little Foxseems -to be a revisitation of themartyred ghost herself. After a thir¬ty year lapse, since the techniquefor expressing profusion of sensa¬tions was “originated,” Leduc hasplunged deeper and ranged widerthan Woolf was capable of doing.Leduc’s sensuous vision of the inex¬plicable insanity of consciousnessexpresses all the freshness of terrorand ecstasy which Dr. Leary claimsto be the domain of psychedelic ex¬perience. For those of us off drugs,reading Leduc at one sitting is rath¬er like an all-day drunk.Leduc does not seem to shareWoolf’s esoteric concerns with in¬tellectuality, with good and badtaste. The Leduc quality of dreamsand fevers suggests surrealism,rather than Woolf’s impressionism(if one must make artistic parallels).Most obviously, Leduc’s is an ex¬pansive world of uncompromisingemotion communicating with everyecstatic and eerie flicker of con¬sciousness. Her attempt to expressthe inexpressible has none ofWoolf’s occasional clumsiness in theflow of poetry. Little of the desireto impress us with innovation is evi¬dent in Leduc’s three novellas. Andalthough one could say that Leduc’stechnique is borrowed illegitimatelyfrom her mentor, it must be notedthat stream of consciousness re¬quires, more than a studied tech¬nique, a peculiar concentrated ori¬entation toward all of life whichcannot be reproduced unnaturally.The war-shattered world to whichWoolf responded is still with us, al¬though doubts have settled deeper.Particularly because we now have aname, Nihilism, for our twentieth-century phenomenon, it would bedifficult to judge Leduc’s bookfrom any moral standpoint. To drawphilosophical statements from Led¬uc’s fantastic world would be totwist her intention. She is simply af¬firming the wealth of individual ex¬perience — which, even more thanfor Woolf, takes on the intensity ofart — in the face of the surround¬ing dominance of a brutal, materi¬alistic age. In this sense, Leduc ismost compassionate in her humancapacity for understanding whatmakes life rich and what ravagesthat richness.Whether the immediate can alsobe the substantial is a problem towhich both Woolf and Leduc ad¬dress their creations of myriadpoetic impressions. Both affirm theimportance of trivialities: in Jacob’sRoom Woolf perceived that “it’s notcatastrophies, murders, deaths, dis¬eases that age and kill us; it’s theway people look and laugh and runup the steps of omnibuses.” Eventhough they may kill us, without the flux of sensations we becomebored, our sensibilities are sterilerooms. Leduc’s characters escapethe boredom of their mundanecountry existence by keeping theireyes “wide open as a clearing in aforest.” Thus a farmhand is de¬scribed as “intent on pulling theteeth of a danger that never came.”Her beggar with the precious littleragamuffin fox fur wassick to death of all those silentbandstands in the parks . . . shewould hurl herself upon the photosoutside the movie houses and soakup some of the drama put out ondisplay.Trying to outrace time — the night¬mare with which modern poetryseems to be obsessed — the oldwoman walks back and forth infront of the packing case where shekeeps her “angel,” “Because shewanted the fringes of her shawl tobrush from time to time againstwhat was awaiting her, against whatshe was waiting for. Hope: the op¬posite of death.”Leduc’s characters are isolatedfrom normal human relationshipsand so build fantastic dream worldsabove their no-nonsense countrysurroundings. The first character isa lonely spinster, owner of a cafeand general store, whose life-longwaiting is finally satisfied when adead man arrives one evening onher doorstep. “The Old Maid and the Dead Man” is a tenderlywrought love story, opulent with na¬ture imagery. The grisly concludingpassage, set in a dim abandonedcafe, suggest the surrealism whichtypifies Leduc:The dead man lying stretched outon his back was flying away fromher now at dizzying speed; thestatues were moving together intogroups, marble hands were joining,alabaster brows were meeting,gray stone necks accustomed to thebold light of the dawn were bend¬ing as the stone heads all fell to¬gether: the statues were leavingtheir gardens and their museumsempty for the dead man. And thesilence afterwards was the memoryleft for Clarisse.The second experience, a longernovella than the other two, gives usClotilde, a willful, dreamy-eyed girlwho lives on her secret tragic lovefor a pale boy of fifteen. More suc¬cessfully than with people, Clotilderelates to copper pots, whiffs ofdust, velvet, duckweed, oak treeroots—her perpetual worship ofnatural sensations is also Leduc’schildlike reverence. Clotilde’s reli¬gion confuses reality with illusion.She relates the death of her littlebrother to the church in a way re¬miniscent of the first novella: “Hewas pretending to be dead, but hewould come out of it. The statues inthe church would give him a help¬ing hand.”The third novella, for which thenovel is named, plunges us into the Furpoverty-ravaged mind of an old beg¬gar who is tenderly in love with acastoff fox pelt found in a garbageheap in the alleys of Paris. Like theothers, but particularly because sheis starving, she “melts into (her) ec¬stasies as though they were jams.”There are several problems in¬herent in stream-of-consciousnesswriting. All-inclusiveness can be¬come chaos; insanity can get out ofhand. But Leduc fortunately is notthe passive feverish patient of manygriefs. She is actively creating withthe guiding intelligence that is re¬quired for any work of art. Somemay attribute her special artisticpower to the pervading myth of themad artist: indeed, her charactersprogress towards insanity. Thetouch of the macabre, dutifully pre¬sent in almost every work dealingwith the terrifying shapes of self,seems to reinforce neurosis as asource of poetic insight for Leduc.But a work of artistic beauty mustrepresent the artist in his whole¬ness. It is true that “only an achingheart / conceives a changeless workof art,” but the mind and sensibilityof the artist must have healed suffi¬ciently to understand the meaningof painful experience — and Leducis very much the master of her ex¬perience. .Half-statement arouses the imagination; saturation of detail tends toshrivel it. The paradoxical effect ofstream of consciousness a la Leducis that statement of detail is not adead-end street. Life is an infinitenumber of combinations in herwoozy kaleidoscopic vision. It defiescapture or paraphrase.The important thing, Weiss’sJean-Paul Marat has warned us, isto “pull yourself up by your ownhair / To turn yourself inside outand see the whole world with fresheyes.” Less traumatically than Mar-at/Sade, The Woman with the Lit¬tle Fox also asks us to give birth toourselves. More obscurly than Vir¬ginia Woolf, and with a far richerstore of sensuous experience, Vi¬olette Leduc reminds us that hu¬manity and insanity are as intimateas a rhymed couplet, and that lifeand death are “two maniacs lockedin a well-matched struggle.” Butagainst this absurdity is the fresh¬ness of Leduc’s naive child-adultmagic in meeting the terribleness ofisolation with poetic fantasies. Led¬uc is deeply involved in her revela¬tions. Speaking of the old woman:“A day would dawn. The earthwould be all ashes and gapingburns, and she would smile thesmile of an accomplice who hadknown all along.” Leduc knows, andit is sometimes a painful smile; butto her martyrs, a small blessing:“wretchedness was also a tender¬ness, and resignation is not thesame as oblivion.”Sally JansonMiss Janson is a fourth-year studentmajoring in English at Valparaiso Uni¬versity.4 • CHICAGO LITERARY REVIEW • February, 1967TouchesofBlackDigging Out by Anne Richardson.McGraw-Hill Book Company.$4.50.Black comic books can be funwhen the jig of human inanity (notinsanity) described therein is origi¬nal. fanciful and creative. When theblack comic ballet is reduced to ashuffle of the mediocre or a proces¬sion of the self-made miserable,black comedy is a drag.Anne Richardson’s Digging Out issuch a drag. Its inadequacies arecompounded by the anemic dramat¬ic thread within the comedy. It mayonly be of value as readings inblack comedy for junior highschoolers who have not sharpenedto the pure bitter-lemon taste of thereal thing.It is a Marjory Morningstar gonewrong, without maudlin romancebut with an imminent and long-awaited death in what is overtly ex¬plained to be a very uninspiredfamily.Mother awaits death in a cancer¬ous metastasis. “‘Candy, candy, can¬dy,’ she said . . . ‘Mallowmars, Her-shey bars, M & M's, Barton’s best.’Typical that she remembers somany names of products on themarket.”Father spends his free momentsin the bathroom, often with TheNew York Times. And daughter,the narrator, witnesses the dramawith revulsion, no sense of absurdi¬ty and only some of the now-tritened rebelliousness of her gen¬eration.The essentials of the book, how¬ever, are in the aunts and unclesand cousins. People wrho sold the se¬cret hiding place of their Pale vil¬lage to the Cossacks for a ticket toAmerica.They are a painted and impotentgang, often bamboozled by their de¬ficient sense of elegance, inspectingthe linen, often attempting to avoidprobate. Several were raised by thesame German maid, a woman (typi¬cally) with old-country problems ofher own.They are Jews: being Jewish is anear requisite for being a currentblack-comic type. But their Jewish¬ness is an oppressively dull thing. Itdoes not contribute to the blackcomic attempt. “Somewhere I mustfind a place to bear my Americanchildren, whom I will mother, and -who in turn will leave me to findtheir own Americas,” the narratorsays in her last dramatic mumbling.‘Sweet Jesus, has anyone thestrength for such exploring?”But perhaps it is not the culturalhangup or the weak slalom to dra¬ma which hurts the book most. Dig¬ ging Out is static; and good, funnyblack comedy is dynamic. It isBruce Jay Friedman’s Stern beingdragged home each night by severalmassive evil hounds. It is JohnBarth’s Goat Boy being bouncedthrough WESCAC’s (West CampusComputer’s) Belly and coming outunEATen. Black comedy, to a greatextent, means the motion of Hookevading the crocodile, although per¬haps more restrained, as directedby the cultural setting.If the anecdotes were funnier orif there were dialogue, Digging Outmight not need motion. But as itturns out, it does need some action,something more brazen than thewag of a powderpuff on a cancerousface in a deathbed. The drama of ayoung woman planning her escapeand ruminating her revulsion is notworth laboring.It is this basic lack of action thathinders Digging Out. The book goesnowhere.Neil BrussMr. Bruss is a third-year student major¬ing in philosophy at the University ojMichigan.PatchesThe Ravishing of Lol Stein, by Mar¬guerite Duras, translated by Rich¬ard Seaver. Grove Press. $3.95.The next best thing to startingwith the end is ending with the be¬ginning. So Duras tries both. It allbegins with the cataclysm: the de¬ception, the lost love. At a ball, Mi¬chael (twenty-five), leaves Lol (sev¬enteen), for Anne-Marie, (age un¬specified). This is all trite of course,so Duras must do something moreto interest us in the forlorn Lol. Butgiven a banal trauma, a superfluoussetting and minimally outlined sup¬porting characters, Lol has prob¬lems being an engaging protagonist.Well, if all else fails, you can al¬ways try saying nothing: so Lol taci¬turnly modulates from boredom todisappointment. And it works. Shewalks, she marries, she watches—she even transcends. Havingrecognized, at the ball, the im¬possibility of discovering “theword” (truth? logos?) that wouldjustify her desire to desire, she be¬comes a remote kind of anti-God,busy “reconstructing the end of theworld”—specifically, “time in all itspurity, bone-white time.” So far,there is promise of poetry: withgood style and an idea to go with it,Duras is equipped to write litera¬ture. But she is afraid to trust tal¬ent alone. She wants to be theatri¬cal.Clearly, Lol is meant to fascinate;but the story isn’t quite so simple.Deceived once and forever, rav¬ished by her best friend’s lover, Lolis doomed to love vicariously. She isto be all woman. The locus of hererotic identity is not herself but an¬other woman, any other, such as herbest friend Tatiana. If only Loldidn’t take things so literally! Thescenes of her diligently gazing at Shreds of MotleyBalloons are Available, by JordanCrittenden. Atheneum. $4.50.Jordan Crittenden was born in1937 in Wichita, Kansas, and as heapproached the age of thirty he de¬cided to write a novel. He men¬tioned this to the man at thecheck-out counter of Horders,where he was paying for two reamsof good bond paper.“If I hadn’t spent my formativeyears in an unenriched environ¬ment I would have been an authormyself,” the man said.“You make excuses for yourself;I’ve published already in The NewYorker, Punch, and Harper’s Ba¬zaar, to name but three of what wecall the quality slicks. How muchwill that be?”“Look,” the clerk said, comingaround the counter and graspingJordan’s arm, “I’d like you to meetmy wife. She’s taking a creative litcourse at the Famous WritersSchool by correspondence, and I’mof Purplelovers through hotel windows are soembarrasingly heavy-handed thatone wonders why the author didn’tnotice.But Duras is, again, too worriedabout being spectacular. She re¬veals, about halfway through thestory, the identity of the mysteriousnarrator (after the suspense has, nodoubt, become unbearable): he isLol’s lover! (Coup de theatre). Atthe end of the novel, Lol visits theball-room where her tragedy tookplace. (Dramatic.) Sex scenes. (Ah!)Is this technique? Certainly it’s notconsummate art.Could it be that the next bestthing to a trite story it. no story atall? Precisely. Duras is at her bestwhen her plot is least discernible,“drama” forgotten. At times likethis, the narrative, camera-simple,intrigues us. The alternation of longlyrical paragraphs with much short¬er concise ones is well timed: thephrase progression is rhythmic.Sometimes, too, the prose has akind of eerie, thinly abstractedquality: partly because the narra¬tor, describing the gestures of hisgirl, often only imagines, tenta¬tively interprets and occasionallymisunderstands her; partly becauseLol is a half-dead girl who can’teven remember how to forget.Yes, Duras is a writer. But in¬stead of relying on the effectivenessof her style, she adulterates it withstage effects. The result is lyricismwithout poetry.Juliana GeranMiss Geran is a second-year studentmajoring in philosophy at The Univer¬sity of Chicago. sure it would do her a world ofgood.”. When the store closed the mandrove Jordan to a Miniburgerdrive-in and honked twice. A pale,bespectacled girl dressed in a Mini¬burger skirt stuck her head in thewindow. “Oh, it’s you, Leonard,”she said. “I’ve had a most ag¬onizing day.”“Loretta, I’d like you to meetJordan Crittenden, a novelist.”“Pleased to meet you,” said Jor¬dan.“Wait,” she said. Returning withtwo dozen Miniburgers, she askedJordan what kind of a novel he waswriting.“Well,” he said, “it’s a sort of Bil-dungsroman, you know, about a fel¬low named Howard Ormsby, pre¬faced by a short quote from W. H.Auden, that frankly, I think, startsthe book on a stylish note. To theeffect that notwithstanding themany modes of transport now avail¬able, all sense of origin or destina¬tion will soon be lost. He says itmuch better of course.”Leonard offered him a polyethyl¬ene sack of ketchup.“This novel is sort of mock- pica¬resque, redolent with black (or shallI say gray) humor, and imbued witha sense of the absurd. It will be fun¬ny, too, in a suave and cool manner.As I see Howard, he is like a bil¬liard ball bounced around by otherbilliard balls, but many of thethings which happen to him are notunpleasant. Nor are they important.Like the things that happen toThomas Pynchon’s characters, butminus any fake aura of underlyingmystery, pattern of significance.Freud compared man to an iceberg;Howard is more like shaved ice,about 500 microns thick. Have youread Malcolm, by James Purdy?”Leonard and Loretta noddeddumbly over their DietRites.“Malcolm got into all sorts of ad¬ventures through no fault of hisown, being rather innocent and pas¬sive, and this afforded him a look-see at all the crazy goings-on in oursociety. Howard is perhaps shallow¬er than Malcom, and the people hemeets somewhat less peculiar. Iaim to write this book in two-threedays.”Leonard was dozing off over thesteering-wheel, and Jordan rear¬ranged him so he wouldn’t nudgethe horn in his sleep.Loretta gazed intently into Jor¬dan’s eyes through the rolled-downcar window. “These Miniburgersare small, all right,” she said, get¬ting into the car, “but they’re surefilling when eaten in quantity.”Bob LavineMr. Lavine is .a fourth-year graduatestudent in the department oj physiologyat The University of Chicago.February, 1967 • CHICAGO LITERARY REVIEW • 5SflMMMMMli The Once and Future CityDivision Street: America, by StudsTerkel. Pantheon Books. $5.95.A book of short interviews israrely dull. Letting oneself go infront of strangers can be very at¬tractive since it may be easier thancoming to terms with those oneknows. Sporadic verbal soul-baringhas become something of a nationalpastime (replacing block parties),and Division Street: America mayappeal most strongly to fans of thisnew sport. This is unfortunate, be¬cause Studs Terkel’s book is morethan a giant Ann Landers columnfor white liberals.Terkel’s cross-section of Chica¬goans are at their best when talkingabout something other than them¬selves—which the interviewer al¬lows them to do about half the time.The reactions of different individu¬als to the same phenomena are sodisparate that they set off the “divi¬sion” of T e r k e l’s metaphoricalstreet far better than do the auto¬biographical sketches of each of itsseventy-two inhabitants.Social justice, for example, isprominent in the minds of most ofthem, but for each it is an expres¬sion of his own personality. Onewealthy matron would be heartilyin favor of the Chicago FreedomMovement if picketting were not soindecorous. A three hundred-poundmarcher relates her experienceswith abusive police matrons alto¬gether without pretension, while aGlenmary nun goes on for pagestelling of the reasons for her com¬mitment to Christ in the world, andleaves the reader little wiser aboutjust what it is she does. A Negroschoolteacher and a YAF organizerboth fear the coming of Americanfascism. One Negro lady refuses tobe caught up in the wealth-responsibility syndrome, and pre¬fers to scare the pants off Whiteyby letting him watch her readingBaldwin and Faulkner on the eleva¬tor. A colored executive, on the oth¬er hand, is about as detached as abrush salesman. The saddest is ateen-age girl who only wishes theNegro would disappear. “They”throw rocks at her when she walksdown the street. She doesn’t carewhy.A summary cannot create theimpression one receives as Terk-el’s characters parade one after an¬other, unfolding perfectly coherentand wildly conflicting value sys¬tems. The only subject of commonagreement is “Communism,” whichseems to have replaced “fire” as aword to be yelled in a crowdedtheater. The influence of Studs Terke)himself is not absent from DivisionStreet: America. It begins some¬where around the front cover andpersists well beyond the last page.Without delineating Mr. Terkel’sprejudices, a few curiosities may benoted. People of a liberal inclina¬tion tend to be of a likeable disposi¬tion, and civil rights activists turnout to be downright lovable. Theyjust happen to choose the right turnof phrase. Reactionary types, on theother hand, have remarkably badluck. One John Bircher is apparent¬ly seeking his lost manhood. Otherunderactive social consciences hard¬ly fare better. They end their littlesoliloquies with unintentionally re¬vealing expressions which point uptheir basic inconsistency, and theyoften turn out to be dreadfully un¬happy.Despite Terkel’s claim that he isnot producing a sociological surveyof occupations or classes, some ofhis encounters are highly predict¬able. Of two advertising executives,one is miserably unhappy in his job,and the other is convincingly hypo¬critical. A fortune-seeking executivesecretary is so superficial that once she has confessed her vast selfish¬ness she has nothing else to say.Terkel presents a property¬conscious Polish window-washerwho is almost a satire, and a land¬lady out of Charles Dickens.The curator of the Wax Museumradio program is less obtrusivewhen transcribing the thoughts ofpeople he likes. A few of his littleportraits are unforgettable. No mat¬ter what he may think of such out¬pourings, the reader cannot be in¬sensitive to some of them. There isthe steelworker, once a perfection¬ist in everything, who has becomeself-pitying and directionless in hismiddle age. An old Virginia aristo¬crat in Evanston does her pickettingin white gloves and Sunday dress. Aretired street-fighter, just begin¬ning to take pleasure in the worldaround him, is drafted into thearmy to take up his former profes¬sion again.If Division Street: America has atheme, it is the fragmentation ofthe city’s old neighborhoods, andthe rise of the “nice people”—civicand business leaders—as the shap¬ers of urban destiny. Mrs. Florence Scala, the articulate housewife wholed the people of the Harrison-Halsted area in their fight to keeptheir neighborhood from beingturned into a shiny white B.S. distillery, is the author of Terkel’s preface. Her friends and associates arefrequently among the intervieweesand their theme is always the sameThe city no longer offers a frame ofreference to the ordinary individu¬al. The few existing communitiesare being “renewed” out, and theurge to conform to abstract values(cleanliness, whiteness, quietness)has taken the place of group feel¬ings.Mr. Scala expresses a distrust of“nice people” which tallies wellwith what most of us have felt orheard. (“There’s one thing which Ilearned at school,” a Loyola workertold me this morning in describinghis union’s latest contract negotia¬tions, “which is this: never trust aman who’s got more education thanyou. He feels he’s better than you,and he thinks he’s obliged to trickyou.”) Terkel’s “nice people,” withtheir absolute values of success andneatness, build the barriers evenhigher. At first the Division Streetpeople appear too wildly differentfrom one another to carry on a conversation. On second thought, theymay siriiply not bother.It would probably be wise formost undergraduates to read Divi¬sion Street: America. This is so de¬spite Scala’s propaganda, the un¬grammatical statements with whichthe reader must contend, the nostalgia and Terkel’s involvement incontemporary problems; for one candiscern the raw materials of somefuture city. One cannot tell what itwill be like, except that Terkel willprobably not approve of it. Heseems conscious only of the citywhich he has known, the city whichis disappearing. The changes he soheartily disapproves of—w h i c hmake talking a complete way oflife—are the very thing that hasmade his book possible.But the book, for all its excel¬lence, is incomplete. The reader •must do his own interviewing forthe sequel.Paul BarrettMr. Barrett is a second-year graduatestudent in the department of history atLoyola UniversityPutting the Arts in Good FormForms and Substances in the Arts,by Etienne Gilson, translated bySalvator Attanasio. Charles Scrib¬ner's Sons. $4.95.What is “pure” art? Speculationon this question can assume a multi¬tude of perspectives; one could viewthe finished art product esthetical-lv, with an eye to the feeling ex¬pressed, its quality of representa¬tion or its ability to evoke certainesthetic responses in the beholder.One could first consider the crea¬tive imagination of the artist, his in¬tentions. Or, one could contemplatethe manner in which plastic mate¬rials have been molded into con¬crete form.It is this latter, more ontological,thrust that Etienne Gilson, notedprimarily for his historical workson medieval philosophy, adopts inhis third book (and, he asserts, hislast, as he will henceforth havenothing useful to add) devoted tothe philosophy of art. Gilson firmlybelieves that philosophy of art—carefully distinguished from artcriticism, which bears on the appre¬hension of a work rather than on itsstructure—can be of service tothose arts which have formal beau¬ty, not expression, as their foremostend. By recognizing the arts of thebeautiful for what they “reallyare,” philosophy can protect themfrom the imminent danger ofannihilation as the result of beingconfused with those arts which, byusurping the title of the arts of thebeautiful, occupy their place inthought as if it were not enough tohave taken their place in reality.Yet Gilson’s argument is no po¬lemic against the “usurpers”; hedoes not pronounce on the contro¬versial philosophical issues whichoften occur in the fine arts. Formsand Substances in the Arts is rathera quiet presentation of a certainphilosophical interpretation of thefine arts which seeks not to chal¬lenge nor to be challenged, only tobe understood.Gilson primarily concerns him¬self with explicating concrete reali¬ties of the arts of the beautiful onthe basis of specific fundamentalconcepts which he clearly sets forthat the outset. Whether or not thereader agrees with Gilson’s in¬terpretation depends upon his ac¬ceptance of these basic concepts.Gilson, that is, asserts that the func¬tion of fine art is the creation ofbeauty, as opposed to representa¬tion or expression. Art then is con¬ sidered as a poietic (“making”) ac¬tivity in which an artist works withthe materials of his particular art toproduce a beautiful form. Themeaning of a work of art is intrin¬sic—its plastic structure is its ownjustification. Although the artist’stechnique, defined as “the particu¬lar manner of imparting to a par¬ticular material the particular typeof form that is proper to it,” is anessential element for the realizationof a beautiful art form, it is not thedistinguishing element: to discussand judge artistic techniques is out¬side the competence of the philoso¬pher.The philosopher seeks to extractthe essence of the arts of the beauti¬ful from their conventional utiliza¬tions. With this aim in mind Gilsonproceeds to examine seven majorgenres of fine art: architecture,statuary, painting, music, the dance,poetry and the theater. He meticu¬lously probes into the “essence” ofeach by determining the materialswith which the artist fashions artis¬tic forms. The artist is free to rejecttraditional forms and create newones, but the form that he impartsmust possess an intelligible relationto the matter comprising it, so thatthe sight or sound of the work of art will be desirable for its ownsake.In his concern for clarifying thestatus of fine art, Gilson suggeststhat the arts may be using materialsfor which beautiful forms have notyet been discovered. He asks: can“atonal” material (that composed ofnoises rather than sounds) be fash¬ioned into a musical form that isbeautiful in itself? Is it possible toconstruct an edifice of concrete thatIwill be identified with architecture,an art of the beautiful, and not withthe art of building, which does nothave beauty as a primary end? Suchqueries remain to be answered bymusicians and architects, not byphilosophers.The central problem occupyingGilson revolves around the avowedconfusion between plasticity and ex¬pression: what role does each per¬form in the arts of the beautiful?Gilson’s answer is clear: art, as anart of the beautiful, does not haveto express anything; it has only toexist as itself—as a beautiful formmolded out of receptive matter.Hence pure art forms are those ofabstraction and non-representation.Gilson recognizes the rarity of suchforms in the history of art to be aresult of man’s natural and sponta¬neous inclination “to prefer those(arts) which favor imitation and ex¬pression to the detriment of the for¬mal elements which are (their) verysubstance.” Of course, a poem orpainting usually “speaks” to itsaudience. But it is an art of thebeautiful only when the object ofthe work is beauty. Confusion easilyarises in determining the “art ofthe beautiful” since representationobscures the true essence of the art.The reader is left to conclude that itis difficult to discern between an“impure” work of fine art and awork that has expression as its ini¬tial end, because the two are oftensimilar in appearance and function.One holding to this relatively nar¬row definition of fine art could easi- A LookBeneathThe BeardsA Prophetic Minority, by JackNewfield. New American Library.$4.75.People in “the New Left” havenever received really perceptivetreatment bv the press. Newspapersprint bi? pictures in which thebeards cover the issues as well asthe r*hin and the beards have b^enlabelled everything from “commiebeatniks” to the heroes of thesixties.Finally, cutting through the bla¬ther spewed by too manv writersin “the popular press,” Jack New-field has applied his sensitiveanalytic powers to this phenomenon—“the New Left.” He has produceda subtly drawn portrait of the or¬ganizations and individuals who indifferent ways express concernwith today’s pressing issues ofpeace, poverty and depersonaliza¬tion.Newfield shares the concerns of“the New Left,” and is only slightlyolder than most of the activists cur¬rently on the scene. Presently oneof the more worthwhile writers onthe chic left’s Village Voice, New¬field has credentials which wouldplace him in the group he calls“The Old Guard” of Students for a(continued on page nine)ly succumb to a defensive attitudeof censure against those who wouldnot hesitate to classify any creationof declared artistic genre—be itstatue, dance or painting—as fineart. Etienne Gilson does not fallinto this error. He issues no recom¬mendations for upholding the sanc¬tity of fine art. Instead, he wiselychooses the tools of reflection anddistinction to lead his readers to arecognition of pure art forms as hesees them. The mellow tone of Gil¬son’s book may possibly reflect hisage and position, and it enhancesrather than detracts from thestrength of his argument. His caseremains ever scholarly and consist¬ent, yet one need not be a scholar toprofit from Forms and Substancesin the Arts; lucidity and concrete¬ness make for readability.Mary Jane NehringMiss Nehring is a second-year studentin Christ College at Valparaiso Univer¬sity.February, 1967 • CHICAGO IITERARY REVIEW • 7The World, the Flesh and the Devil—With the Emphasis on the LatterLetters of C. S. Lewis, edited, witha Memoir, by W. H. Lewis. Har-court, Brace & World. $5.95.It has been said that there aretwo sorts of people who admire thework of C. S. Lewis: those who haveread The Screwtape Letters andthose who have read The ScrewtapeLetters and something else. Al¬though Lewis has published credita¬ble works in many genres, includingan excellent piece of literary criti¬cism, several good novels and somemediocre poetry, only Screwtapehas enjoyed any wide and lastingpopularity.Lewis’s philosophy and his meth¬od of rationalization are well-suitedto the epistolary form. In Screwtapehe was able to criticize many cur¬rent ideas of morality and fashionwithout being faced with the embar¬rassing necessity of having to justi¬fy his views. By creating a fictionaldemon, he could cast aspersion onj The staff artists are Belita ILewis and Bob Griess. Both arestudents in the college of The §University of Chicago, and are ||interested in selling their work. ||They can be reached for this ppurpose through our editorialoffices — telephone Ml 3-0800,I extension 3265.- ’< $$$ •;whatever he chose by having his de¬mon praise it. Logical bases andjustifications were not important:insight was.All of Lewis’s philosophy carriesa hollow ring of common sense withit. But whenever he opens himselfup to close scrunity, as he does insome of his theological works, muchof the sense becomes inaudibleabove the din of pedantry. His mostsuccessful books (with the exceptionof The Allegory of Love) have beenhis most direct. His style is scholar¬ly at its best, sterile and pedantic atits worst.This is hardly surprising whenviewed in the context of Lewis’s lifeas portrayed in this volume of hisletters. Sequestered in childhood,he turned to writing at an early ageas an outlet for his moderately fer¬tile imagination. Even before theage of literacy, as his brother re¬counts in the introductory memoir,Lewis gave vent to his imaginationby renaming himself. He wisely de¬cided that Clive was not a suitable * name for a young man and, puttinga finger to his chest, announced“He is Jacksie.” He also displayedsome of his future logic by refusing,from then on, to answer to any oth¬er name.Lewis attended several stiflingEnglish public schools and, by hisown account, found them distaste¬ful. He then discovered what was tobe his home for the major portionof his life: Oxford. His letters fromOxford take on a new tone of excite¬ment. Always an avid reader andamateur critic, he found the literaryclimate of Oxford in 1916 ideal forhis purposes and soon decided thathe wanted to spend his life there asa don. He wTote his father that“this place has surpassed my wild¬est dreams; I never saw anythingso beautiful, especially on thesefrosty nights.” He added, however,that “it is fearfully cold at aboutfour o’clock on these afternoons.We have most of us tried, with va¬rying success, to write in ourgloves.”An anti-pacifist, Lewis enteredthe infantry in 1917 as an officer.Although his views on pacifism re¬mained the same, he quickly discov¬ered that the army was not for him.When wounded in the back by mis-placed British artillery, Lewiswrote to his father asking if a dis¬charge could be arranged. Althoughthe discharge was not forthcoming,the war ended soon, and Lewis re¬turned to Oxford and his studies.He graduated with distinction andsubsequently found his own nichein the faculty, a niche that was tohold him until 1954, when he final¬ly moved to Cambridge.Lewis has won fame not as an ex¬cellent literary critic, which he was,nor as a good writer, which he was,but as a theologian, which he wasnot. Raised as a Christian, he be¬came an atheist in his youth, andthen, returned to Christianity atOxford. Although this is not by anymeans a unique experience, Lewisdiscovered, somewhat to his sur¬prise, that he was able to writequite sensibly about Christianity.In doctrine, he favored the funda¬mentalist stand over the modern¬ist, but only slightly. He tried, asmuch as possible, to remove him¬self from controversy in his popu¬larizations of Christian philosophy.Sometimes he did not succeed.He met with some resistance fromtheologians when he introduced a carnate devil into his works. Antici¬pating this response, he prefacedthe introduction in this way: “Iknow someone will ask me, ‘Do youreally mean, at this time of day, tore-introduce our old friend the dev¬il—hoofs and horns and all?’ Well,what the time of day has to do withit I don’t know. And I’m not par¬ticular about the hoofs and horns.But in other respects my answer is,‘Yes, I do.’ ” He also took issue witha certain popular notion of “heavenwith a little bit of hell in it.” Al¬though he spent much of his timegrappling with the problem of theChristian Hell, he concluded that itexists, is the polar opposite of Heav¬en and is the final ruin of thoseconsigned to it. “If a game isplayed, it must be possible to loseit.” He remained troubled, however,by the figure of a God who “seemsunwilling, or even unable, to arrestthe ruin by an act of power.”Lewis carried a drastic ‘either-or’rationality with him throughout hislife. He felt each man had a numberof clear-cut choices in life. Thechoices lay between Christ as “a lu¬natic or an imposter,” “marriage. .. or else total abstinence,” Chris¬tianity or paganism. Lewis’s letters reveal a side of theman not often seen in his publishedwork. He stands revealed as meekand scholarly, a man with a livelywit, a vast fund of knowledge anda joyous enthusiasm for literature.The volume is sprinkled with noteson everything from his distaste forThe Canterbury Tales to his affec¬tion for Tolkien to his disregard ofKierkegaard. Whenever he casts offthe scholarly cloak and speaks ofhis personal preferences to his clos¬est friends, his faults melt away,leaving his charm, wit and goodtaste.When reading Lewis’s letters,one thinks of his comment on Cow-per’s correspondence: “He had- nothing—literally nothing—to tell *anyone about; private life in asleepy country town where Evan-gelical distrust of ‘the world de- <nied him even such miserable so¬ciety as the place would have af¬forded. And yet one reads a whole ,volume of his letters with unfail¬ing interest.” Almost, but not quite.John Gray <Mr. Gray is a second-year student ma¬joring in bio-chemistry at the Univer¬sity of Michigan. R08E*tGRJEss8 • CHICAGO LITERARY REVIEW • February, 1967A Look Beneath Beards(continued from page seven)Democratic Society, having workedas a full-time activist with the groupin 1962.While clearly sympathetic withthe current crop of iSDS-ers, SNCCworkers and others, Newfield isable to stand aside a bit, notingboth the virtues and the limitationsof each species in the New Left or¬der.The distance between the observ¬er and observed is never greatenough to obscure Newfield’s ownbackground. For instance, whendiscussing the current “hangup”of SNCC with the public misunder¬standings arising from the blackpower program, Newfield is thewhite Northern liberal, sympathe¬tic but skeptical. “It is a joylessdesperation that fuels SNCC’s gam¬ble with black nationalism today,”he writes, contrasting the recentself-examination of SNCC leader¬ship with the feelings of hope andfear during the 1964 FreedomSummer. He can pinpoint the rea¬sons for the new policy, but hequestions its future.Likewise, Newfield analyzes thedifferences between the more orless non-ideological, free-wheelingand action-oriented SDS members,and the ideologies of the “heredi¬tary left,” which follows old lineslaid down in the thirties.The ways in which the “heredi¬tary left,” such as Progressive Labor,differs from the mainstream of the“New Left” are many. Newfield firstpoints out differences inideology—PL’s belief in violence asa way to bring on the revolution,and its strict adherence to Marxist-Leninist dogma, rejecting the here-ticism and revisionism of Trot-skyites, the New Left, and even theCommunists (who are old fogiesanyway).The difference of “atmosphere”is even more revealing than that ofideology. Newfield contrasts the“i n f o r m a 1, communitarian andwarm” atmosphere of SDS with thatof the PL, whose members “spendconsiderable time in ‘secret meet¬ings,’ disappearing ‘underground,’infiltrating the Communist Party,dodging FBI agents, and changingtheir names...Newfield’s scorn for DuBois clubmembers is even sharper. He as¬serts that they are not only “knee-jerk Marxists,” but 1934-vintageknee-jerkers. “DuBois Clubs (are)an anachronism today, pro-labor,pro-Russia, and pro-Democraticparty at a time when the New Radi¬cals consider all three conservative,w°rn out, and hierarchies out oftouch with the people.”Not only the young inheritors,but the over-thirty donors of thelegacy of “outworn radicalism” alsocome into Newfield’s New Left line°t fire. He dismisses a number ofliberals, old-time socialists and for¬mer radicals turned reactionariesby placing them into convenient categories and discussing the viewshe attributes to each category.Thus, Sidney Hook and LewisFeuer are “ex-radicals, now pro-Cold War liberals;” Irving Howeand Bayard Rustin are said to sharemany objectives with today’s stu¬dents, but have carried on a ranco¬rous debate with them based moreon style and tone than substance.Of course, there are those whoare close to the New Left, such asStaughton Lynd of the “RomanticLeft,” and I. F. Stone and his fellow“Humanist Liberals.” These aretreated more sympathetically.While the categories may beslightly restrictive and oversimpli¬fied, Newfield’s discussion of the is¬sues on which each segment of theOld Left differs and agrees with theNew Left conveys a mine of infor¬mation in a few well-chosen verbalnuggets.Newfield’s personal acquaintancewith SNCC and SDS people enableshim to present deftly brushed mini¬atures, which are extraordinarilyhelpful in assessing just what kindsof people are in the New Left bag.Stokely Carmichael, for instance,was for a time caught between hisschoolmates at the highly selectiveBronx High School of Science, andplaymates in Harlem, who consid¬ered him a “faggot” for messingaround with books so much. Hissensitivity to the “two-ness” ofbeing both American and Negro ledCarmichael first to largely NegroHoward University in Washingtonto study philosophy, then graduallyinto “pilgrimages to the South,” fi¬nally to the 1964 Summer Project.Such personal descriptions of afew of the leading actors in NewLeft groups provide sharp insightsinto the movement. Frequently,however, clumps of characters whoplay smaller roles in Newfield’sscenes are dismissed with labelsthat are disturbingly reminiscent ofTime-style—“ideological and Puri¬tanical Steve Max” of SDS; Jake Ro¬sen of Progressive Labor, remem¬bered as “trying to sell Communismlike a door-to-door salesman, cheer¬fully and aggressively.”It is Newfield’s practice of set¬ting scenes and characterizing theactors that is perhaps most valu¬able. In recounting the efforts toorganize Negroes in one of the mostviolent of the redneck, red-clay Mis¬sissippi counties, for example, New¬field both gives a taste of the condi¬tions, and looks into the feelingsand motives of the people in his sto¬ry. Much of his tale is told in theactors’ own words, adding to the in¬sight afforded.For a valuable view of the peopleand issues of the “New Left,” New¬field’s book is a fine piece of per¬ceptive journalism.David L. AikenMr. Aiken is a first-year graduate stu¬dent in the department of education atThe University of Chicago. Our Advertising AgencyBy JEROME AGEL, Editor of a Monthly MisnomerEvery month we put out a lively news¬paper for the literate reader with asense of humor. In spite of ouragency, we’re a roaring success.We cover What’s Happening. W ho’sHappening. Underground. Over¬ground. Long before anyone else,usually.We call ourselves “BOOKS.” Ourreaders call us other things. Like,“BOOKS the damn thing I can’t putdown until I have read everything init—twice.” “BOOKS my sophisticatedLSD cube.” “BOOKS the funniest,hippest thing I’ve ever read.” “BOOKSmy monthly brunch coat.”While reviewers are praising for theumpteenth time the diary of a Swissprivate and the history of glass de¬sign, we’re reporting what’s happen¬ing, what’s really happening, baby.Our theory is that books, authors,films, viable ideas—people—aren’t asdull as others make them out to be.Highlights from our monthly psy¬chodrama:—Idaho’s homosexual scandals, “The Boysof Boise.”—The real message of Barbara Carson’s"MacBird”: "Don’t jump on the RFK. band¬wagon,”-Marshall McLuhan: “Art is anythingyou can get away with.”—Tom Wolfe, why do you dress that way?Tom Wolfe, why do you dress that way?Tom Wolfe, why do you dress that way?—For Hotch the Belle Tolls., —“Best Minds in Medicine Are TakingCare of Rabbits.”—Jeane Dixon, the seer: “Governor Wal¬lace would make a good President.”—The new journalist is replacing the oldnovelist.—One of Truman Capote’s “In ColdBlood” killers, Perry Smith, sounds like-well, like Holden Caulfield: “She was tryinghard to act casual and friendly. I really liked her. She was really nice.” And. “Now. that'ssomething I despise. Anybody that can’tcontrol themselves sexually. Christ, I hateihat kind of stuff.” On the piano rack in theClutter farmhouse that night was the musicfor "Coming Thru the Rye.”Every issue is an unpredictable ex¬perience. News, seminal ideas, layoutsavailable nowhere else. Plus plus plus.Scoop scoop scoop. Up to 75 per centof our readers have re-subscribed—unprecedented interest! Trendmaker,trendmaker, make me a trend.Another important and originalservice: Summaries of hundreds ofhardcover and paperback books inthe month they are published, bycategory.Write the beautiful people: “Ter¬rific, lively writing, sensational illus¬trations. Reading BOOKS is like liv¬ing with someone you love,” “Like agreat night at the movies or theatre.”“Loved your topless issue.” “Fantas¬tically imaginative, entertaining, in¬sightful. Scholarly books never had itso good. Put me down for two moregift subscriptions.” Writes Newsweekin a two-thirds of a page rave:“BOOKS has a talent for first-ratescoops.” Writes James Purdy: “Howcan you last? Isn’t America beautifulenough without you?”BOOKS is available only by sub¬scription. Not on newsstands. If youwant to be included, send us the cou¬pon today. It’s the kindest cut of all.BOOKS/Agel Publishing Co.598 Madison Ave., NYC 10022One year: $2.92 ($2.92?)Two years: $5.50.THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS - 5750 Ellis Avenue—S5.00 The American Journal of SociologyThe Journal of BusinessJournal of Near Eastern StudiesThe Journal of ReligionModern PhilologyPerspectives in Biology and MedicineThe Social Service ReviewTechnology and CultureS' ,i\UVtut*deKoj r-lit'*” h«aUFebruary, 1967 • CHICAGO LITERARY REVIEW • 9Uncle Tom in a Button-Down CollarHistory of tho Chicago UrbanLeague, by Arvarh E. Strickland.University of Illinois Press. $7.50.To the more militant strains ofthe civil rights movement, the Ur¬ban League headquarters is “a veri-tible ‘Uncle Tom’s Cabin’ wheremiddle class Negroes, misguided so¬cial workers, and do-nothing whiteliberals busily eat out of the handsof white power, and, in return forthe privilege, make concessions leftand right, leaving Mr. Charlie witha good conscience and the Negropopulation with a few token bene¬fits.” Radical activists level thesame criticism at the League asthey do at white liberals: “We hearall you say, but we see nothing youdo.”The radicals are right when theysay, “We see nothing you do,” forthe League functions inconspicuous¬ly outside the public view and bymeans of individual rather thanmass influence. The executive di¬rector of the Chicago League, Ed¬win C. Berry, describes the processthis way: “something else (is) goingon quietly behind the facade of ar¬ticulation and public demonstra¬tion.” Thus, a careful inside analy¬ sis of what the League actually doesis necessary if we are to evaluate itsrole in the civil rights struggle to¬day. Strickland provides us withsuch an analysis.In Strickland’s view, the UrbanLeague tried in the past to alleviatethe problems facing the Negro com¬munity through social work and aidto particular individuals. Conse¬quently, the League proved ineffec¬tive in dealing with widespread so¬cial and economic problems. But inthe 1960’s, because Negroes havedeveloped higher aspirations and anorganized movement with new lead¬ership as well as drawing a moresympathetic response from thewhite population, Strickland feelsthe League can abandon the limita¬tions of its traditional approach anddeal with larger social problems,working with and for like-mindedgroups. For example, one of theLeague’s traditional functions hasbeen sociological and economic re¬search on Negro life. But such re¬search is useless unless it clarifiesspecific problems. In the past, theLeague has been unable to use theresults of its investigations effec¬tively, but recently the material has been of use to other organizationsthat can organize active protest.This is what happened in the Willisschool controversy of 1961-1962.The League’s findings on the con¬ditions in white and Negro schoolsgave groups such as T.W.O. clearobjective facts around which theircampaign was built.The League can use its personalcontacts and associational influenceboth in negotiations with city andbusiness officials as well as in aid¬ing needed legislation. The Leaguewas influential in the passage of theIllinois Fair Employment Bill andtook part in the negotiations withMayor Daley this summer.Strickland’s analysis asserts, how¬ever, that the criticism of theLeague is correct in that theLeague achieves the above goalsthrough compromising “uncle-tomish” methods depending onwhite sentiment. The question iswhether these methods are neces¬sary for the League to perform itsfunctions, and whether these meth¬ods can co-exist in the movementwith the black power pressure. TheLeague does depend on moderatewhite business support in fund rais¬ing and gains much of its influencefrom this affilation. Non-activist in character, the League neither triesto organize the majority of the Ne¬gro population nor to force the rec¬ognition of the problems on whitemoderates as SNCC does. Beforepassing judgment it must be real¬ized that the functions the Leagueperforms demand such methods.Often the League cannot take apublic, activist stand on issues forfear of alienating its prime sourceof income and influence, the whitemoderate community. If it is to doits work, it needs to calm and reas¬sure moderate sentiment. Only suchtactics can accomplish the politicaland legal aims of the League; theLeague cannot expect to threatenthe power structure and still workwithin and under its graces. Mili¬tant organizations by their very na¬tures cannot act with the diplomacyneeded to play both sides. Likewisethe fact that the League is tightlyorganized with a small, permanentstaff enables it to function with aunity of purpose foreign to theloosely-structured mass movementsof radical groups.The Urban League has a definiteplace in the movement; it can act asa mediator between the establish¬ment and the more militant organi¬zations. In addition, the League caneffect certain legislative and judi¬cial decisions that pressure from ac¬tivist groups cannot even initiate.There is a place in the psycholo¬gy of the civil rights movement fora moderate position as well as blackpower. The Urban League gives thewhite liberal something to do. Rythe nature of its program, SNCC,unlike the Urban League, would neither want nor need alliances withpowerful business concerns. Howev¬er, if such assistance can furtherthe interest of the movement, thenit should be used. Only a moderateorganization can gain the confidence of the establishment and putthat confidence into effective ac¬tion. Therefore, the Urban Leaguehas a unique position in the civilrights struggle, and new develop¬ments in leadership and techniqueseem to suggest that it will fulfillthe potential of its role.Strickland presents a detailed re¬view of the League’s history interms of its functions and methodsof operation. His account is purelychronological, and discussion oftheoretical problems and issuesarises only as a digression from thedry analysis of the facts. But if thebook is not a clarification of theproblems that beset the League andother such organizations, it is awell-researched, objective work onwhat the Urban League has done.As such, it clarifies the problems ofa moderate organization which mustachieve reforms while workingwithin the establishment..Lillian OllingerMiss Ollinger is a third-year studentmajoring in psychology at Lake ForestCollege.to • CHICAGO LITERARY REVIEW • February, 1967PAPERBACK PLAYBACKmThe midwinter slump is uponpaperback publishers, qualitativelyif not quantitatively; one wonderswho writes, and who reads much ofthe bus-station trivia churned out.Several books of merit, however,can be gleaned from the generallyundistinguished recent offerings.Among the reprints of importantnovels are John Fowles’ strangeand obscure The Magus (Dell); InCold Blood (Signet), the much-touted “non-fiction novel” by Tru¬man Capote; The Saddest Summerof Samuel S, by J. P. Donleavy(Dell), which narrates in the mannerof The Ginger Man the problems of awriter in his fifth year of psychoanal¬ysis; and Peter Mattheisen’s AtPlay in the Fields of the Lord (NewAmerican Library), a sensitive ac¬count of missionaries in Africa. FarFrom the City of Class (PocketBooks) is a collection of bizarrelyhumorous short stories by Bruce.Jav Friedman, author of A Moth¬er's Kisses. The Greatest ThingSince Sliced Bread by Don Robert¬son (Fawcett Crest) cutely combinesSalinger and suspense in describing a day in the life of Morris Bird III,age nine, and Signet has issued inone volume Beatle John Lennon’sagile concoctions, In His OwnWrite and A Spaniard in the Works.In the field of literary criticism,NYU Press has published ErikaOstrovsky’s Celine and His Vision,an exploration of the dark and em¬bittered psyche of the author ofVoyage to the End of Night andDeath on the Installment Plan. Can¬did critic Susan Sontag’s AgainstInterpretation (Dell) examinescamp, contemporary theater andthe French intellegentsia.Bantam’s Supernatural HorrorSeries offers nine volumes of har¬rowing stories with appropriatelyhideous covers, including a book ofwitches, warlocks and werewolvesby Rod Serling. Devotees of flam¬boyant morbidity will also enjoytheir Gothic Novels Series. Sampletitles: Wake Up Screaming, UnholyTrinity, Sleep No More.Malcolm X Speaks (Grove) pre¬sents the late Muslim’s speeches, in¬terviews and letters in a companionvolume to his autobiography. Strange Communists I HaveKnown, by Bertram Wolfe (Ban¬tam), studies ten recalcitrant Marx¬ists, including Leon Trotsky andRosa Luxemburg. Relations be¬tween the NAACP and the Com¬munist Party are analyzed by Wil¬liam Record in Race and Radical¬ism.Designed to offend whateveroriginal spirits fled thither (andthereby to contribute to commer¬cializing the area) is John Gruen’sThe New Bohemia (Grosset andDunlap), about the East Village,with photographs. Lu Emily Pear¬son discusses the domestic life andattitudes of another cultural groupin Elizabethans At Home (Stanford),also with contemporary documenta¬tion. Kenneth Keniston’s The Un¬committed: Alienated Youth inAmerican Society (Dell), relates re¬search conducted with Harvard stu¬dents in sundry existential dilem¬mas.There are several exciting newbooks of poetry in paperback.Grooks (M.I.T.), the haiku-like versecreated by Danish poet Piet Hein,has been translated into English forthe first time. YevgenyYevtushenko’s Bratsk Station andOther New Poems (Anchor) containsthe title epic and recent lyrics,some bombastic, some sparkling.The Complete Poetry of Cavafytranslated by Rae Dalven (Harvest),presents the sensual wisdom of thePoet of Alexandria. The ModernHebrew Poem Itself, edited by Stan¬ ley Burnshaw and others (SchockenFolio), is a unique introduction tothe material, with texts, translitera¬tions, and historical and literarynotes. The passionate pessimism ofThomas Hardy appears in his Se¬lected Shorter Poems (St. Martin’s),and in Selected Stories, both intro¬duced by John Wains.Eric Bentley has written a finegeneral introduction to theater enti¬tled The Life of the Drama. (At-heneum).Holloway has resuscitated two“classics” of the amours of the“American and Russian FannyHill’s”—The Memoirs of Dolly Mor¬ton (“plantation system brutalities”)and Grushenka Three Times aWoman (“debauchery in CzaristRussia.”)The late sick humorist LennyBruce’s How To Talk Dirty and In¬fluence People is now available legi¬timately in Pocket Books. The sec¬ond volume of the autobiography ofanother tormented, but in this casecreative, mind is August Strind¬berg’s A Madman’s Defense (An¬chor). Nikos Kazantzakis’ magnifi¬cent, tumultuous Report to Grecohas been released in a Bantam edi¬tion.These selections are by no meanstypical; most recent paperbackshave been of the calibre of TwoThousand Insults for All Occasionsand Four Thousand Names forYour Baby.Jeanne SaferAll Books Reviewed In This Issue Of The Chicago Literary ReviewAvailable At The UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO BOOKSTOREViolette Leduc - The Women with the Little Fox *4.95Studs Terkel - Division Street: America *4.95Etienne Gilson ~~ Forms and Substances in the Arts *4.95Marguerite Duras - The Ravishing of Lol Stein *3.95Frank Elli - The Riot *4.95W. H. Lewis - Letters of C.S. Lewis *5.95Arvarh E. Strickland - The Chicago Urban League *7.50‘■i Kenneth Burke - Language as Symbolic Action *10.00, i». • ~ ••• ' •>.’*"• ■ ■" ' - ' " ' -■ - ;sj-. . : , ••. .University of Chicago Bookstore5802 ELLIS AVE.Chicago, IllinoisFebruary, 1967 • CHICAGO LITERARY REV I E W • IT"Woodrow, Jesus and the Viennese ExegeteThomas Woodraw Wilson: A Psy¬chological Study, by SigmundFreud and William C. Bullitt.Houghton Mifflin Company. $6.00.This psychological study ofWoodrow Wilson fails for two rea¬sons. First of all, Freud’s axiomsare highly questionable, especiallywhen used to reduce the complexi¬ties of a mind burdened with con¬siderations of international politicsto a simple tug-of-war among ego,id. and super-ego. Secondly, the au¬thors are unable to disentangletheir own hostilities to Wilson. As aresult bitterness pervades the work,and its objectivity must be chal¬lenged. Whether or not the authorsare attempting an historical study,their method, coupled with theirthinly disguised distaste for Wilson,forces us to question or even negatetheir conclusions.One would expect SigmundFreud to be objective. Bullitt, in hisforeward, describes him as “a manof ruthless intellectual integrity.”(“Ruthless” is the key word here.)Yet Freud, the self-acclaimed un¬prejudiced inquirer, pettily con¬demns Wilson for destroying Euro¬pean culture by acceding to the de¬mands of the Allies during thepeace conference. Freud and Bullittunceasingly lambaste Wilson with“ruthless intellectual integrity.”Such judgements constitute neitheran historian’s interpretation nor apsychoanalyst’s evaluation: they arerather the condemnations of an an¬tagonized acquaintance and haveno place in a study by SigmundFreud.The venom of William Bullitt isfrustrating for one who expects newinsights from an intimate of Wilsonduring the Versailles fiasco. Thecharacter of his regard for Wilsonis established early in the digest offacts from childhood and youth. Hispreoccupation with the nickname“Tommy” lasts throughout thebook: indeed, he refers to WoodrowWilson as “Tommy” even duringhis Presidency. (Incidentally, Wil¬son dropped the name “Thomas” inhis twenties; Freud interprets thisact as mother identification, asWoodrow was his mother’s maidenname.) This annoying detail is notsignificant in itself; but consideredwith the rest of Bullitt’s bitterprose, it reveals a disgusting antipa¬thy. From the style of this section,Bullitt’s contributions to the rest ofthe chapters are easily identified.Whenever he indulges in phycho-analytic procedure, he slings Freud’slingo like a parrot mocking a skilled elocutionist. One wonders if Freudbecame the co-author of this bookin order to analyze Bullitt throughthe perspective of Bullitt’s fatherfigure, Woodrow Wilson.Freud’s analysis of Wilson iscomprehensive: every fact present¬ed in the book fits perfectly into thedefinition of the man’s psychic con¬stitution. Beginning with his basicassumptions about the subconsciousand libidinal economics, Freud dis¬cusses the importance of Wilson'sminister father, the resolution ofhis Oedipus complex and the re¬sulting repressions, identifications,and sublimations. The analysis isconsistent and precise within thelimitations of information availableon Wilson.From this “limited” analysis, theauthors conclude that Wilson satis¬factorily resolved his Oedipus con¬flict and encountered normal rela¬tions with women (whew!), althoughlittle libido was needed for the pur¬suit of his sexual gratification ormother identification. They furtherresolve that a significant portion ofhis libido was centered in Narcis¬sism and that an inordinately largeportion of libidinal energy was con¬centrated in passivity to his father.This last conclusion is particularlyrelevant for Freud and Bullitt,since they use it repeatedly to ex¬plain Wilson’s inconsistent behaviorand relationships with other men.Passivity to his father resulted inWilson’s identification with Jesus Christ, and a contradictory tenden¬cy, activity to the father, resulted inhis identification with God. SoWoodrow Wilson, throughout mostof his life, was in his subconsciousboth God and Jesus Christ.These unusually strong identifi¬cations are, for the authors, themost important causes, perhaps theonly causes, of Wilson’s fame, of hiseventual disgrace and mental col¬lapse, of the United States' delay inentering the World War, of Wil¬son's failure at Versailles, of his dif¬ficulties as President of Princeton,of his weird love-hate relationshipswith younger men, of his hate rela¬tionships with older men, and, final¬ly, of his indigestion. This is quite acomprehensive set of causes. (While Freud’s system may ex¬plain many of these incidents, onewonders about the relegation ofWilson’s rationality to a positionwhere it is solely controlled by hissubconscious.Indeed the manner in which the un¬conscious employs the consciousportion of the mind as a tool tocarry out the wishes of the libido,using reason to find excuses to jus¬tify actions desired by the uncon¬scious, has rarely been more vivid¬ly illustrated than by the argu¬ments Wilson used.... Facts ceasedto exist for him if they conflictedwith his unconscious desires.This statement is repeated instranger terms when the authorsdiscuss Wilson and the Treaty ofVersailles. Certainly, from the factsabout Versailles presented in thebook they feel justified in ignoring - Wilson’s reason. Freud’s famouscomparison of the mind to an ice¬berg seems ominous in view of Wil¬son’s contradictory statements dur¬ing the conference. But to ignoreman’s reason in favor of a facile ex¬planation is extremely dangerouswhen one considers the relevance ofreason in making a decision basedon political reality. Granted, in thecontext of the facts, Wilson did notappear overly rational: but to brushaside his rationalizations and seeksolutions in the conflicts betweenego and id completely obliteratesthe perspective of reality, the demands forced upon the man by sit¬uation. Was Wilson capable ofdealing with the reality of Ver¬sailles? Freud believes he was notbecause of the turmoil in his subconscious. But what case can bemade for the confusion of an over¬whelming number of details andperhaps Wilson’s intellectual inca¬pability for ordering them? Whatabout the lack of sufficient facts fordetermining the situation historically?These points are best illustratedbv another incident in Wilson’s life,the entrance of the United Statesinto the war. Freud claims that Wil¬son’s indecision was rooted in hisidentification with Christ: he want¬ed to be the Savior of mankind andcould not satisfy this subconsciouswish if he committed the UnitedStates at a time when an “evilpeace” was inevitable. His identifi¬cation with God would also be chal¬lenged if he could not dictate termsof lasting peace to his “flock ”Again, this preoccupation with sub¬conscious motives led Freud to neg¬lect the fact that Wilson was tor¬tured by a huge moral burden: to“sentence our young men to death”and “insure the destruction of bil¬lions of dollars worth of capital” fora war which would end in an “evilpeace” and almost certainly resultin continued warfare and entanglement for both Europe and the United States was beyond his compre¬hension. Wilson regarded, perhapsjustly, the motives of both the Al¬lies and the Central Powers withdisgust. That he should enter a waron either side under conditionsw'hich would inevitably lead to an¬other war was a reality which herecognized and, however inconsis¬tently, sought to alter by negotia¬tion with both sides. But Freud andBullitt insist that his agony wasproduced by subconscious identifi¬cations and not by a rationalizationof the morality of the situation. Forthem God and Jesus Christ dictatedterms to Wilson’s reason, not therealities of an ugly war resulting inan ugly peace.Ted KrontlrisMr. Krontiris is a third-year studentmajoring in mathematics at The Univer¬sity of Chicago.12 • CHICAGO LITERARY REVIEW • February, IW7Letters to the Editor of the Maroon■i *•> > * M/ Jitor’s note: The tremendous num-h,r of letters that have been receivedI y the Maroon during the last twonks has made it impossible for usit) print more than a fraction ofthrtn. We will, in the next week, tryu> print as many of the letters we,ne received as is possible.)Thin ThreadTO THE EDITOR:] have not yet decided whetherihe moral issue involved in mypaying some of my money to theUniversity of Chicago whichkeeps some of its money in abank which invests some of it*money in racist South Africa, islarge enough to warrant the pro¬tests presently being raised. Thethread of moral responsibilityveems to stretch quite thin, per¬haps to snap entirely.But I am quite unambiguously'hocked at some of the argumentsmembers of the University Ad¬ministration have advancedagainst such protests. Redfield,for instance, says that we shouldnot press the University to takeits funds out of the ContinentalBank because “I believe that apolicy of public involvementwould be destructive of the Uni¬versity”. Historically this is afairly weak argument. Oxford andCambridge universities have eachhad a member in Parliament'ince the time of Edward II, andneither seems to have been un¬duly weakened, much less de¬stroyed. by the “public involve¬ment” implicit in electing a politi¬cal representative.BUT THEN Levi amplifies thisargument: “The University has todecide how it wiH influence thecommunity—by ideas or by eco¬nomic action.” ". . . the profes¬sors whould talk to Continentalwith ideas, not force.” It is, hefeels, incongruous with the Uni¬versity’s poskion as an inteMec-toal influence on the communityfor it to wield any economic influ¬ence.Such an argument simply begsthe question; Levi assumes thatthe University does not now wieldany economic influence. This ishighly unlikely. While I have notbad occasion to examine the Uni¬versity of Chicago’s fiancial state¬ments, I am under the impressionthat it has a fair amount of mon¬ey invested or in search of invest¬ment. I would be surprised if itsposition were very dissimilar tothat of Harvard, for instance,which is the second largest land-owner in Cambridge and thethird largest in the Boston area(running, in both cases, closelybehind the Roman CatholicChurch, which is also supposed tobe more of a spiritual than aneconomic force in the communi¬ty).• F THE University truly wishes<o abstain from wielding any eco¬nomic power, let it give awaythese funds and investments, andbecome an pversized log withJames Redfield, for instance, onone end and several thousand stu¬dents on the other. Let it take thevow of poverty and become ananti-university, (And then let ittry to run an anti-Harper-Librarywithout an endowment.)Levi obviously does not haveIbis solution in mind. What he ad¬vocates is that the University ab¬dicate, not from the power its fi¬nances have generated, but fromresponsibility for the usewhich is made of that power. It iscowardly, dishonest, and hypocrit-nal to attempt such a division ofi*ower and responsibility.Levi advocates that we resignftvis Control into the hands of fi¬nancial “specialists”, like RogerAnderson of the Continental Bank,!'ho believe that it is possible to “make our decision without mak¬ing moral judgements. . .” A gen¬eration ago, scientists, in thename of this same academic de¬tachment, made a similar abdica¬tion of control over the influentialwork they had done, and left it inthe hands of political “speci¬alists” with much the same viewsas Mr. Anderson.I am disturbed at the blithereadiness of the academic com¬munity to generate power (eco¬nomic or physical) and then aban¬don all responsibility for its use.While the University of Chicago-Continental Bank-South Africaquestion may not be the occasionfor the University to exercise itseconomic power for moral ends,let us not blind ourselves to thepossibility that sn$h an occasioncould arise in the future, nor crippie ourselves with detachment tothe point of being unable to meetit if it does.MARIAN H. NEUDELRedfield's GadflyTO THE EDITOR:I will begin by slating unequivo¬cally that I, like Mr. Redfield, aminterested in the preservation ofthe University as an open forumwhere any idea may competefreely for acceptance. I am, how¬ever, in disagreement with his let¬ter on many points, only two ofwhich I will mention here.FIRST, I think it is less thanfair of Mr. Redfield to state that“the movement for political activ¬ism on the part of the Universityis carried on by members of ourcommunity who do not reaHy un¬derstand or care for the life of themind.” This red herring is no bet¬ter and no worse than the tenden¬cy of some students to label as“reactionaries” all those facultyand administration members whodisagree with them. Furthermore,such a tactic shows little respectfor the free exchange of ideaswhich he purports to defend.Second, although I agree withMr. Redfield that the Universityshould avoid a policy of involve¬ment in political issues, I disa¬gree with his implication that theuniversity must unalterably oppose any such involvement. Hehas made the mistake, not un¬common in our century, of sup¬posing that non-involvement willensure the freedom and integrityof the University.In an age of extraordinarilypowerful governments, when en¬tire nations have fallen victim topsychotic ideologies and wheneven the most respected citizenshave bartered their integrity, per¬haps unconsciously, for the mereright to exist—in such an age, thefreedom of both individuals andinstitutions must be defended ac¬tively, passionately, self¬consciously, and, at times, evenpolitically.UNDER CERTAIN conditionsthe University is “politicized”without its assent and even with¬out its knowledge. In such a casea political stand on the part of theadministration is necessary to ex¬tricate Che institution from a com¬promising situation and to restoreits autonomy, integrity, and free¬dom.The real task of the universityIs not to take a categorical standagainst political involvement, butrather to establish criteria forjudging the extent of its resiponsi-bdlity to society and under whatcircumstance a political stand oraction is necessary. What shouldrightly be discussed as a matterof judgment, Mr. Redfield hasturned into a matter of dogmaticprinciple.IN SHORT, I think Mr. Redfieldhas merely confused the issues.He has made irresponsible and probably inaccurate statementson the intellectual commitment ofhis opponents. He has virtually at¬tempted halt the debate by ar¬guing that the University “wouldbe a university no longer” if hisposition is not accepted, failing toadmit that men and institutionsmay be destroyed by inaction aswell as by irresponsible action. Ithink it is important for us all tounderstand that the problem ofresponsibility is real, it is histo¬ry’s legacy to our age, and itmust not be glossed over by rhe¬torical tricks. The first step wecan take is to consider this ques¬tion seriously and to attempt anhonest assessment of our respon¬sibilities to society and to our¬selves.JOHN LEARYLibelous?TO THE EDITOR:Your editorial of January 24 isboth inaccurate and dangerous. Itis also libelous because neitherRobert Scheer, nor the 7th Dis¬trict Community for New Politics,nor the California CoordinatingCouncil for New Politics, nor anyother element of the New Politicsor the New Left ever expressedany preference for Ronald Rea¬gan.Your statement that they did isa product of your fantasies, andshould be~ retracted in your edito¬rial columns, with suitable apolo¬gies to the maligned parties.The New Politics movementboycotted the election for Gover¬nor feeling neither candidate de¬served to be governor of Califor¬nia. It was former-governorBrown, you should not forget, whofirst violated the autonomy of theBerkeley campus by sending thestate police to break up theSproul HaM protest. I’m sure youwould not have forgiven GovernorKerner had he done the samehere last May. Governor Reaganhas carried things a good dealfarther, vindicating the feeling ofthe New Politics people that analternative political movementmust be developed, explicitlycommitted to a program of uni¬versity freedom, popularly elect¬ed regents (as in Illinois and oth¬er states), etc.Your shrill tone recalls otherliberals who blame their own fail¬ings on the Left; in many casesthey warp the facts to fit the theo¬ry, just as you have warped factsto fit your fantastic politicalnightmares. Thus Stokely Carmi¬chael and the Black Panther par¬ty have been blamed for electingMrs. Wallace in Alabama; Scheerhas been blamed for electing Rea¬gan; and Maxwell Primack andDr. King for defeating SenatorDouglas.The real problem is that the oldliberal leadership has opted out—it has failed to remain relevantto the needs of the people. Theyappear bumbling andineffective—like Governor Brown.They rest on the programs theyhave already passed (which any¬one can see haven’t dented thesocial problems of the sixties)like Paul Douglas. They take agiant step into the right-wing likeHubert Humphrey. Or they saythe problems are too complex tobe solved. This allows Republicanbusinessmen like Romney andPercy to appear dynamic and is¬sue-oriented by comparison. Andthis reflects the sorry state of ourpolitical life. But it in no way jus¬tifies attacking those of the NewLeft who are trying to inject ideasand controversy into politics.Rather you should question why,at the very time millions ofAmericans sense the deepeningcrisis in our social life and ourforeign policy, liberals have so ut¬ terly failed in their job of offeringreasonable reform alternative tothe crisis. It is this failure thathas led to the gains of the Rea¬gans and Wallaces—the countryvoted in the liberal democrats inthe sixties and they flopped. Pick¬ing our scapegoats won’t hide it,either.So I wouid suggest that yougentlemen take a more carefullook at the New Politics. Attentionto the facts might prove useful.You might also look in on the Illi¬nois conference of New Politicsactivities occurring February 4thand 5th at the “Y” at 1001 N.Dearborn.Yours in the interest of res¬ponsible journalism.PAUL BOOTHBOARD.NATIONAL CONFERENCEFOR NEW POLITICS(Editor's note: There have beennumerous published accounts deal¬ing with the support of Reaganby New Leftists including one inthe June 26, 1966 Chicago Sun-Times, entitled “The New Left:Trying to Overturn the Table.” Inthat article, Robert Scheer wasquoted as saying hr preferredReagan to Brown.)Red SquadTO THE EDITOR:On Wednesday evening. I at¬tended a meeting of students in¬terested in further action on theSouth African banking issue.Present at that meeting was aCity of Chicago policeman, withanother one in the building.Upon being asked to leave, thepoliceman did so.When asked to explain his pres¬ence, he said that City policehave the right to walk throughUniversity buildings at any time.Later, when I asked what the in¬terest of the Chicago Police De¬partment was in our meeting, Iwas told that it has an interest inany group plotting a crime. Iasked, “Is a misdemeanor acrime?” “Yes,” he replied.The presence of these police¬men, with or without the Univer¬sity Administration’s knowledgeand approval, constitutes a clearattempt to intimidate studentsand to deter them from ever ven¬turing downtown for such a dem¬onstration as took place on Mon¬day.I would suggest that the ap¬propriate administrators take thestrongest possible action to seethat students who are engaged inentirely lawful activities such asthe meeting on Wednesday eve¬ning, not be subjected to intimida¬tion from the police of the City ofChicago.LOREN K. WALDMANLying With StatisticsTO THE EDITOR:As the Maroon’s reporting ofnational student opinion on rank¬ing is approaching a primer onhow to lie with statistics, I wouldlike to attempt to rectify some ofthe Maroon’s transgressions inthis regard.The recent account of the Fiskecommittee report was curious inits failure to report the studentresponse to the very first questionin the committee’s questionnaire,which directly put the questionagitating the campus last spring,“Should the University continueto make male class rank avail¬able to any student who requestsit for selective service purposes?”The response was “Yes” by avote of to 40^. Somehow theMaroon only reported the answerto one of a series of questions onwhat information should be sentdirectly to draft boards.The Maroon also recently re¬ported a referendum at Harvardas opposing reporting of rank, when the actual situation was ascant 46%-43% plurality againstthe proposition that the Universityshould be required to compilerank. This was generally taken asrelating to what the national de¬ferment policy should be, not to astudent’s rights given the nationalpolicy.Finally, the Maroon’s pageshave never been contaminatedby mention of referenda support¬ing issuance of rank on studentrequest which have occurred atsuch schools as Brooklyn College.The Maroon’s technique on this is¬sue may be good propaganda,but its poor journalism.DANNY J. BOGGSP.S. The Maroon makes moneyoff Chase Manhattan. Chase Man¬hattan makes money off SouthAfrica. The conclusion is left asan exercise for the student.<Editor’s note: Mr. Boggs neglectsthe fact that 12% of those answer¬ing the question he cites were '‘un¬certain." It should be noted that,as stated in the Maroon story, 54%of those answering the questionnaire—a clear majority—indicated thatthe University should not supplymale class rank to draft hoards ata student’s request.)h r,i<jqedionTO THE EDITORMy statement to the Inter-House Council of January 23 wasintended for the whole campus be¬cause it formulated a comprehen¬sive rationale for the separate de¬cisions about tbe various rulesproposed by nine houses, it there¬fore indicated some guide-linesfor the future. This would havebeen evident even if 1 had not ex¬plained it all to your reporter.Nevertheless, the Maroon ofJanuary 24 limits itself to a fewcarefully selected quotations fromthe document and supplements itsnews story with an eighteen incheditorial which has a lot tenden¬tious things to say about my“moralizing and evasion.”You too are welcome to moral¬ize as you please, but don’t youthink your readers have a right tothe materials that would enablethem to form their own judg¬ments?WARNER A. WICKDEAN OF STUDENTStEditors Note: We had intendedto run the text of Mr. Wick’s state¬ment Tuesday had space allowed.An excerpted text appears else¬where in this issue,)P"ml ColloquiumTO THE EDITOR:The Maroon’s otherwise accu¬rate article concerning the firstRuml Colloquium erred in itsreference to a “faculty commit¬tee”.In fact a student-faculty com¬mittee, of which I have beenchairman, has planned the collo-quim and all of its members havegiven much time and effort to theenterprise. They are: RobertRoss, Naomi Shapiro, PeterSharfman, Michael Wade, RogerWeiss and Gilbert White.For the committee I should liketo urge that on Friday and Satur¬day of this week members of theUniversity community come overto the Law School Auditiorium toavail themselves of the opportuni¬ty afforded by the colloquium;that is, tp hear and join in a ma¬jor inquiry into the strategic,domestic and ethical issues thatcomprise “The Viet Nam Prob¬lem”.MILTON J. ROSENBERGPROFESSOR OF PSYCHOLOGY *■«January 27, 1967 • CHICAGO MAROON • 7Carpet CoppedBandersnatchcommittee member: “We are astudent run organization,” she said,“and I think that if we offer goodfood at low prices, people won’tspoil a good thing by stealing fromus. There is no indication that thiswas a student theft.”The projected opening for theBandersnatch is the second weekin February. Before that time, the Burglarystudent committee must meet withits faculty committee and the ini¬tial budget must be submitted forapproval.The Bandersnatch committeehad planned a dance for February4 before the complications in open¬ing arose, and this dance will takeplace as planned, even if the shopis not open on that date.Johnson Names Boorstin to CommissionBigA section of the carpeting!for the Ida Noyes Snack Shop,the Bandersnatch, was stolenlast week.The swatch of tweed carpet was9' X 3' and had not yet been glued tothe floor. It had beet cut to fitagainst the east wall. A replacingpiece of matching carpet must beordered from Georgia, thus requir¬ing shipment time. Although theuncovered portion of the floor is to¬ward the rear of the shop, the ar¬chitect’s office feels hesitant aboutopening the shop until the carpet¬ing is replaced."THIS THEFT brings up theproblem of how we are to preventfurther thefts,” said a snack shopcommittee member. “If people willsteal our carpet, they’ll steal ourdishes, glasses . . . hell, they’llprobably walk off with our furni¬ture.”He was countered by another Daniel J. Boorstin, Preston andSterling Morton professor of historyat UC, has been appointed a mem¬ber of the American Revolution Bi¬centennial Commission by Presi¬dent Johnson.The Commission will developplans for the observance of the200th anniversary of the American Revolution. Boorstin’s appointmentwas announced in Washington,D.C., on January 19. Carlisle H.Humelsine, president of ColonialWilliamsburg, was named as chair¬man of the 25-member commission.Boorstin is an authority on Amer¬ican civilization and is the authorof seven books. CalendarFriday, January 27DINNER: Koinonia: an evening withdinner and discussion at the Taize (Community, 4500 S. Greenwood, iRides leave Chapel House at 5:30and Bonhoeffer House at 7 pm.LECTURE: "What Operant Edu¬cation Is Teaching Psychology,"Ogden Lindsley. Swift CommonRoom, II am. ISEMINAR: “Studies on the initiationof Protein Synthesis,” Dr. Mario jCapecohi. Ricketts North 1, 4 pm. ILECTURE: “Do Cancer Cells GrowFaster?” Dr. Rienato Basarga.Samuel S. Feels Reseadch Institu¬te. Billings pi 17, 5 pm.LECTURE: Contemporary Theological |Thought, Ida Noyes Hall, 7:30 pm. jLECTURE: “The Economics of Apart- jheid”, William H. Hutt. BreastedHall 8 pm.LECTURE: “Jewish Visions of God", 'Rabbi Nathan Gaynor, Hillel Direc- jtor. 5715 Wodolawn Ave., 8:30 pm.OPERA: Euridice, Peri; Ida NoyesTheater, 8:30 pm Howard M.Brown, director.FILM: God Lives!, Social Sciences 128.7:15 and 9:15 pm. Day ot Wrath,Carl Dreyer.FOLK FESTIVAL: Mandel HaU, »:1S of Eventspm. Buddy Guy, Skip James, andothers.LECTURE: "Rise and Decent of theAramaic Script", David Nasgowitz8 pm.THEATRE: Tryouts; "Tonight at8:30” Reynolds Club 7:30-10 pm.Saturday, January 28CELEBRATION: Republic Day CelebraUon, India Association of the Uiuversity of Chicago, also FoodBazaar 6-8 pm. Cultural ProgramInternational House. 8-10 pm.FOLK FESTIVAL: Magic Sam andShaky Jake, and others. MandelHall. 8:15 pm. afternoon performance also.RADIO SERIES: Nightline. WBBM780 kc. 10:30 pm. A public forumfor the discussion of current issuesSunday, January 29RADIO SERIES: From The MidwavWFMF, 100.3 me. 7 am. "Genes andPeople”, Prof. Curt Stem.FOLK FESTIVAL: Lester Flatt antiEarl Scruggs, and the Foggy Mountain Boys: Mandel Hall, 8:15 pm.RELIGIOUS SERVICE: RockefellerMemorial Chapel. 11 am. Preacherthe Reverend Charles A. Baldwin.Chaplin and Lecturer in the Deptof Religious Studies. Brown University. "To Whom Shall We Listen.’"TAMCArM-YMCANTOnrm APfl)A Mimic AN M8HKS9MN MMTM AM. H Ml ML•Roms io tmo ovrI III ha Ut4 Ik mm 4-1042Be Practical!Buy Utility Clothes!Complete selection of boots, over¬shoes, insulated ski wear, hoodedcoats, long underwear, corduroys,“Levis", etc., etc., etc., etc.Universal Army Slore1364 E. 63rd ST.PL 2-4744OPEN SUNDAYS 9:30 1:00RENT A TRUCK$+% 00 Per HourDO-IT-YOURSEIFTRUC K RENTALSO 8-98008150 Stony IslandSundays $3.00 per hourBOB NELSON MOTORSImport CentroA—lhComplete RopotoAnd ServicePer AM Popular importeMidway 1-49016052 So CoMaae GroveDocument Reproduction PlaquePermanent replica of treasured docu¬ments In stainless steel. The process isphotographic and does not harm or afterthe original document in any way. Thelettering, metal fused to metal, is actuallyraised from the surface. The finishedplague is mounted on hand rubbed walnutwith bracket for hanging.Size II" x 13" $25.00Gift DepartmentTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGOBOOKSTORE5802 Ellis Avenue PRESENTINGCONVAIR... A Great Name in AerospaceThe Convatr Division of GeneralDynamics Corporation is one of thelargest and most sophisticatedaerospace and research firms in thecountry. It was formed in 1965 throughthe merger of two divisions of GeneralDynamics: the old Convair Division and theAstronautics Division, both in San Diego.The heritage ot Convair dates back toaircraft production prior to and duringWorld War II. In recent years the formerConvair Division produced the Air ForceF-102 and F-106 jet interceptors, theand 990 jet transports, and the Little Joesolid rocket booster. The AstronauticsDivision was the home of the Atlas, thefree-world ICBM, and the subsequentdevelopment of the Atlas as one of thenation's major space launch vehicles;many other aerospace and researchprograms were undertaken by Astronauticsincluding Centaur—the first U.S. spacerocket powered by liquid hydrogen.Company DescriptionConvair is primarily involved in research,development and production connectedwith the aerospace industry. Its primaryefforts are in complete systems andprograms. The spectrum includes spacelaunch vehicles, electronics systems,maneuverable re-entry vehicles, commer¬cial and military aircraft and oceanographicresearch.Major programs include the Atlas spacelaunch vehicle; the Atlas/Centaur boosterprogram used to put the Surveyor space¬craft on the moon; the design and installa¬tion of complete telemetering stations;conversion programs on Convair militaryand commercial aircraft; satellite research;manned space systems, and oceanographictelemetering buoys.OpportunitiesThe variety of Convair products requiresengineering graduates at all degree levelswith majors in aeronautical, electrical,electronic and mechanical engineering,engineering mechanics and engineeringphysics.Engineering or science graduates will beassigned to the following areas; advanced systems, systems analysis, space sciences,life sciences, information sciences, sci¬entific data processing, aeroballistics,dynamics, thermodynamics, guidance,structures, mechanical design, electricaldesign, reliability, test engineering andmaterials research.Special Features and AttractionsConvair offers outstanding fringe benefitsincluding an Employee Savings and StockInvestment Plan to which the Companycontributes as well as a Retirement Planand Tuition Assistance Programs. Convairengineers can select from many company-sponsored educational assistance pro¬grams and determine for themselves whichis best suited to their particular require¬ments. These programs, held in conjunctionwith four highly rated local colleges anduniversities, include a tuition refund plan,an irregular work week to permit collegeattendance, an advanced-degree work-study program, special courses andseminars, and Doctoral Fellowships,among others.One of the nice things about working atConvair is living in San Diego... one of thecountry’s truly great resort centers. Withonly 10 degrees difference between Janu¬ary and July highs, the sunny San Diegoclimate is pleasant throughout the year.Two great bays and 70 miles of oceanbeaches provide all year aquatic sportsand fishing. Exciting Mexico is just a fewmiles away. Nearby mountains, a world-famous zoo. and a marine park add fo thefun... plus 64 golf courses foryear 'roundplay. San Diego is an ideal family city withexcellent schools. As the country’s 16thlargest city, San Diego offers the best incultural attractions, performing arts, pro¬fessional sports, and other entertainment.Come to Convair...Where the Magic ofAerospace Unfolds.Our representative will be visiting your campussoon. Contact your College Placement Officer toarrange an interview appointment, or writeto Mr. J. J. Tannone, Supervisor, Protesslo.nlPlacement and Personnel, General DynamtoeConvair Division, 5608 Kearny Villa Road,San Diego, CaliforniaGENERAL DYNAMICSConvair DivisionSan Diego, CaliforniaAn Equal Opportunity Employer8 • CHICAGO MAROON • January 27, 1967Prof. Gendlin LecturesOn Human Existenceby Slade LanderEugene Gendlin, assistant professor of phiolosophy andpsychology, discussed the nature of form in human existanceand problem solving in a lecture entitled “Viewing throughPhilosophical Psychology," Wednesday night.The lecture was part of an open 650 Year Old CollectionLibrary Gets ManuscriptsMore than 17,000 pages ofmanuscripts, some as much as650 years old, have recentlysession of the course “Religion inthe Intellectual Life” chaired byvisiting professor Henry Rago.About two hundred students at¬tended the lecture and informaldiscussion, held in Social Sciences308. ’Gendlin stated that problem solv¬ing requires that there be an organ¬ic creation of form. “Any problemsolving process demands that therebe forms further than those whichare given,” he stated.Gendlin explained that there is aconstant interchange between formand life and all life processes areorganized into both structural andtemporal forms. But no process, hesaid, can be ongoing without theexperience of valuing. It would bemeaningless to experience withoutform, but, at the other extreme, toomuch form can sometimes belooked upon as a substitute for ex¬periencing.• When you formulate there is atemptation to fall for the formula¬tion.” Gendlin said. “However, itwould be silly to trade in all experi¬ence for formulation. Yet the levelof most research were as thoughthis were not so.”As a solution to this, Gendlin pro¬posed an organic method oi formu- Careers$ mm *' | m m mRecruiting representatives of the follow¬ing organizations will visit the Office ofCareer Counseling and Placement dur¬ing the week of January 30. Interviewappointments for 1966-67 graduates maybe arranged through Mr. L. S. Calvin,Room 200, Reynolds Club, Extension3284Jan. 30Western Electric Company: Chicagp;midwest; east coast - production; indus¬trial relations; purchasing; program¬ming; S.B. and S.M. in Mathematics orPhysics.Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.:Harvey, Ill. - sales; programming; pro¬duction.Jan. 31Hewlett-Packard: Palo Alto & Pasa-■ dena, Calif.; Colorado Springs, Col.;i Pennsylvania; Massachusetts;. New Jer-'sey - all degree levels in Chemistry (allspecialties) and Physics (atomic, solidYou won't Kava to put yourmoving or storage problemo4i until tomorrow H youcall m today.RITIRSON MOVINGAND STORAGE CO.IMff I. D*y Ar+•46-4411 lation. “When I formulate I goback and see that I’ve done to whatI had before,” he stated.Thus, any concept can be consid¬ered in two ways. First, within ascheme, where implications are de¬duced from the concept within thescheme. Second, by “becomingaware of where you were at whenyou were using the concept a mo¬ment before.”The first method falls short inthat a concept is only part of thelife process. “Human nature is nota scheme,” Gendlin stated.“If you become aware of whereyou are at you can get information I state' elementary particle)which vmi can n/^t „ ! E. R. Squibb & Sons: New York andwnicn you can not deduce from a Brooklyn, N.Y.; New Brunswick, N.J. -all degree levels in Microbiology, Bio¬chemistry, and Chemistry (all special¬ties).Feb. 1U.S. Army Material Command: cen¬tralized recruiting for over 30 researchand development facilities nationwide •all degree levels in Mathematics, Chem¬istry (all specialties ) Physics (all spe¬cialties) and Statistics.Swift & Co. Research & DevelopmentCenter: Oak Brook, Ill. (Chicago sub¬urb) - programmers; S.B. and S.M. inStatistics; all degree levels in Chemis¬try (analytical, organic, physical).John Moynahan & Company: repre¬senting eight of the largest public rela¬tions firms based in New York City -public relations trainees.Fgb. 2. State of Illinois Personnel Depart¬ment: Chicago, Ill. . will speak withgraduates of any department to adviseof vacancies in the State appropriate totheir academic work.Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCo : Milwaukee, Wis. - supervisorytrainees, programmer trainees, homeoffice underwriters.concept,” he asserted.A further disadvantage of aSchematic approach to problemsolving is that a shift in the meansof approach may mean adopting ascheme which would exclude theoriginal problem entirely. However,accepting the life process and all itentails as part of the problem solv¬ing method affords an anchorwhich allows shifts in methodologywithout the risk of losing sight ofthe original problem.“Life doesn’t have on consistant,logical grit,” Gendlin asserted.However, it is still necessary tohave some form, for “anything isall the other things that it takes tolocate it and it is nothing morethan everything else.”EYE EXAMINATIONFASHION EYEWEARCONTACT LENSESDR. KURT ROSENBAUMOptomatrUt53 Kimbark Plaza1200 East 53rd StraatHYde Park 3-8372Student and Faculty Discount PEOPLE WHO KNOW CALL ONCUSTOM QUALITY CLEANINGAll Pressing Done on PremisesSilks Hand FinishedExpert Alterations and Repairs1363 E. 53rd St.10% STUDENT DISCOUNT PL 2-9662OFFICE SIJITFS AVAILABLEfrom $110SH0REIAND HOTEL55th at the Lake on South Shore DrivePRIVATE ENTRANCECall Mr. N. T. Norbert - PI 2-1000THE PUBIN THENew Shoreland Hotel55th & South Shore DriveThe Newest Meeting Place in Old Hyde ParkTHE PUB SPECIAL:THE GREATEST AND BIGGEST CHEESE STEAKR'JRGERIN TOWN-$1.00Michelob and Budweiser on Tap!Piano Selections Friday & Saturday evenings been acquired by the UC libra¬ry.The huge collection includes liter¬ary material; historical, political,and military papers; private andgovernmental correspondence; ec¬clesiastical and Inquisitional docu¬ments; devotional works; and legalpapers.The University acquired the col¬lection from an English bookseller.It once formed part of the libraryof the French scholar RaymondFoulche-Delbosc, a leading Hispan¬ic authority.Many of the papers pertain toSpanish nobility. There are docu¬ ments related to the EmperorsCharles V and Maximilian H;Kings Philip H, Philip III, andPhilip IV; Queens Maria Anna andMaria Christina; and large num¬bers of noblemen, statesmen, cour¬tiers, and generals.Among the literary manuscriptsare an 1848 volume of poetry byJuan Daza Malato, a collection ofunpublished verse dating from 1755by Francisco Javier Garcia, and a15th century essay by the Mar¬quis of Villena. There are alsoseveral pieces of poetry and dramaby unidentified 18th and 19th cen¬tury authors.AMERICAN RADIO ANDTELEVISION LABORATORY1300 E 53rd Ml 3-9111- TELEFUNKEN & ZENITH -- NEW & USED -Sales and Service on all hi-fi equipment and T.V/s.FREE TECHNICAL ADVICETape Recorders — Phonos — AmplifiersNeedlas and Cartridges Tubes - Batteries10% discount to student* witti ID cord*THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGODIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCESBEARDSLEY RUML COLLOQUIUMThe Viet NamProblemFRIDAY, JANUARY 27, 19673*30 P MWHAT SHOULD WE DO NOW? ISSUES OF POLICYHans Morgenthau, University of ChicagoCharles Wolf, Rand Corporation6:00 P.M.Dinner Meeting, Burton-Judson, West Dining HallAddress: A Reporter’s View from Hanoi and SaigonJacques Decornoy, Agence France Presse and Le Monde8.00 P.M.Panel Discussion on Viet Nam PolicyPeter Beckman, University of ChicagoSanford Gottlieb, S.A.N.E.Christopher Hobson, University of Chicago, S.D.S.Nathan Leites, University of Chicago10:00 P.M.Discussion in Small GroupsSATURDAY, JANUARY 28, 19679:00 A.M.DOMESTIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE VIET NAMWARPapers by:Tom Hayden, Newark Community Union ProjectGoffrey C. Hazard, University of Chicago Law SchoolPanel Discussion by:Murray Finley, Amalgamated Clothing Workers ofAmericaPhilip M. Hauser, University of ChicagoArcadius Kahan, University of ChicagoTheodore J. Lowi, University of ChicagoA1 Raby, Council of Community Organizations11:30 A.M.Discussion in Small Groups1:30 P.M.ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAT S ANDINSTITUTIONSPanel Discussion by:Isaac Balbus, University of ChicagoPeter Caplan, University of ChicagoIra Kipnis, Attorney and University of ChicagoSoia Mentschikoff, University of ChicagoJames Powell, University of ChicagoGibson Winter, University of ChicagoJanuary 27, 1967 • CHICAGO MAROON • 9VMovie ReviewSuperficiality in the1Best' FilmA Man for All Seasons, which opened last night at the Esquire, has received many awardssince its opening this .Christmas in New York. Among other things it was cited as the “bestfilm of the year” by the New York Film Critics. Fred Zimmermann, the director, was namedbest director, and Paul Scofield, the film’s star, best actor.That this honor should go to afilm which does not utilize everyaspect of the cinema does not sur¬prise me. For one thing, there is asubtle feeling that only commer¬cially successful prestige films areconsidered. The validity of this atti¬tude can be argued elsewhere;what concerns me here is that AMan for all Seasons simply fails touse the cinema in any meaningfulway. A superficiality pervades theentire movie, which pretends to beprofound and beautiful.THE FILM OPENS with severalclose-ups of statues followed by a-** shot of the castle to which they be¬long. Zimmermann then cuts to car¬dinal Wolsey (Orson Wells), lookingas obese and villainous as possible,sealing a document. The paper ispicked up by a grovelling Cromwell(Leo McKern) who then makes amost cerimonious exit. After leav¬ing the building with much ado, hegets into a boat and departs by wa¬ter. The credits then appear oversome of the most artsy-craftsy pho¬tography I have ever seen.What has happened here contin¬ues to happen throughout the entirefilm. First, the actors define theircharacters as soon as they comeon. They have little or no depth andwe can be sure that they will notchange. When they speak (as infact they later do) we can be surethat they will not talk but declaim.They are there for one purpose, toshow off the goodness of Scofield'sSir Thomas More.Zimmermann seems to think thatbecause he is dealing with an im¬portant theme, he must create |something grand. Unfortunately, heseems to think that grandure issynonymous with overstatement.Every time Zimmermann wants to |establish a location he uses at leastthree shots, two of which are un¬necessary. The result is that hisshots, some of which might makegood stills, are meaningless. Be¬sides, the contant repetition isboring. is responsible for the worst aspectof the movie. The buildings are bigand the shots are long. The lawnsare beautiful and even the boatsare cerimonious. The fact that thisis the tragedy of a man has beenlost in a spectacular.I think in this aspect the failureof the film must rest not only withZimmermann but with screenwriterRobert Bolt as well. Bolt wrote theplay upon which his screenplay isbased. Since writing the play, hehas devoted himself almost entirelyto the writing of such movies asLawrence of Arabia and DoctorZhivago. I was anxious to see AMan for All Seasons simply be¬cause I wanted to know if Boltwould write this movie the way hehad written the other, or whetherhe could still respect his work.While the basic theme remainsthe same in both the play and themovie, the poetic ambiguity is lostin the film. Where is the commen¬tary on “the common man” thatwas found in the play? More im¬portant, where is the ironic com¬ment on More’s treatment of thecommon man? What has happenedto the ambiguity involved in choos¬ing More, a man who died for anabsurd principle? (He refused torecognize the divorce of Henry VIII because it negated the divinity ofthe Pope.)All such ambiguities have beenlost, I am afraid, in the huge cas¬tles, lawns, and rivers of England.Instead we are given good ThomasMore (and family) against the badvillains.THE ONLY GOOD acting isfound in the group of protagonists.Scofield is excellent, something wehave come to expect. Wendy Hilleras his daughter is fine and ColinRedgrave (son of Michael andbrother of Vanessa and Lynn) up¬holds a great family tradition. Therest of the cast all seems to bemade of cardboard. Since theyhave all given good performanceselsewhere, I believe that the badacting is due to the director andscript.On the positive side, TerryMarsh’s interiors are so fine that Icould not tell when a scene wasshot on location and when it wasshot in the studio. George Deleruehas provided another of his excel¬lent scores. Also, Vanessa Red¬grave makes a brief, unbilled, ap¬pearance as Anne Bolyn. She issuch a professional that even whengiven a miniscule part she gives agreat performance.T. C. Fox(OPEN DAWN TO DAWN) Culture Calendarmr o’V; t sari i**Art GalleriesART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO—Retro¬spective exhibition by Edouard Manet.Jan 13-Feb 19. Photographs by HaroldAllen and Edward Sturr: Thru Jan 15.Photographs in Pola-color by MarieCosindast Jan 21-Mar 5. Daily, 10-5;Thu 10-9:30; Sun,12-5. Michigan &Adanis.UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO—Construc¬tions, paintings and drawings by GeorgeOrtman. Jan 16-Feb 15. Daily. 10-5: Sat,1-5. Closed Sun. 108 Goodspeed Hall,1010 E. 59th.Jazz ConcertsCHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA—In their 76th Season. Jean Martinon.Music Director and Conductor; IrwinHoffman, Associate Conductor; Mar¬garet Hills, Director, Chicago SymphonyChorus.Fifteenth Week—Thu Sc Fri. Jan 26-27.Jean Martinon, cond; Peter Frankl, pi¬ano. Bach; Sinfornia for Double Orches¬tra in E flat, Op. 18. Mozart: PianoConcerto No. 26 in D. Ruggles; “SunTreader.” Wagner: Prelude to “The !Mastersingers of Nuremberg.”Thu-Sat. Concerts: Thu, 8:15, Fri, 2:Sat, 8:30. $2.50-$6.50. Fri gallery seatsfor students $1.50 (available until 1 pmonly). Orchestra Hall Box Office: Daily.9:30-6; later on concerts nights. Sun.1-4. Orchestra Hall, 220 S. Michigan. HA7-0362; Sun Sc Hoi after 5: HA 7-0499 j57th STREET CHORALE—Three con- Icerts by the 57th Street Chorale of theUniversity of Chicago and the ChamberOrchestra of The Flute and Fiddle Club-Bach: Jesu Joy of Man's DesiringBach- Motet No. 6, “Lobet den Herm.Poulenc: Exultate Deo. Albinoni: TwoOboe Concerto. Mozart: CoronationMass, K 317. Sun, Jan 22 at 8; Sun, Jan29 at 3:30; Sun. Feb 5 at 11. Free Jan22 at First Unitarian Church. 57th andWoodlawn: Jan 29 at North Shore Coun¬try Day School, Church and Green BayRoad; Feb 5 at Emmanuel EpiscopalChurch. 203 S. Kensington, LaGrangeFA 4-4100. HI 6-0674 or FL 2-1275.Ml 3-31135424 S. Kimbarkwe sell the best,and fix the restHobby House, Restaurant TheatreTHE ECCENTRICITIES OF NIGHTINGALE—Written by Tennessee WilliamsBella Itkin, dir; starring Dolores Sutton Jan 13-Feb 5. Nightly, 7:30; Fri &Sat, 8:30. Closed Mon. Nightly $3 50Fri & Sat, $4 00. Goodman TheatreMonroe Sc Columbus. GE 6-2337.SECOND CITY—23rd satirical review“Enter from Above.” Sheldon Patinkindir. Cast includes Bob Curry, SandyHolt, Sid Grossfeld, Jon Shank. DavidWalsh, and Penny White. Sun Sc Tues-Thu at 9; Fri, 8:30 Sc 11; Sat. 8:30, n &1. Closed Mon. $2.50; Fri Sc Sat, $3.001846 N. Wells. DE 7-3992. MO 4-403'>after 7:30.THE MAD SHOW—Musical review byLarry Siegel and Stan Hart based onMad Magazine and originally perfomedoff-Broadway. Music by Mary RodgersLyrics by Marshall Barer, Larry Siege]and Steven Vinaver. Nightly, 9; Fri <iSc 11:30; Sat. 6. 9 & 11:30; Sun. 6 Sc 9Closed Mon. Happy Medium Theatre901 N. Rush DE 7-1000.HULL HOUSE THEATRE—‘Until theMonkey Comes” by Venable HerndonRobert Sickinger, dir. Thru Jan. Fri &Sat. 8:30; Sun. 7:30. Fri Sc Sat. $3 90Sun, $3.40 3212 N. Broadway. Telephonereservations accepted. 348-5622.UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO—CollegiumMusicum: Peri's “Euridice” (1600) FriSun. Jan 20-22: Thu-Sat, Jan 26 28 at8:30. Adults, $3 00: Students, $1.50. IdaNoyes Theatre. MI 3-0800, ext 3886EUROPE59 Student Tours21 to 73 daysBy jet, ship, studentflight &Bicycle, Hobo,Workcamp andStudy Tours.from $330,Call campus rep eves, or week¬ends at 262-3765.THE BEST SOURCE FORArtist's MaterialsComplete Picture FramingServiceMounting; Matting Non-GlareGlass - School SuppliesBE SURE TO ASK FORWEEKLY SPECIALDUNCAN'S1305 E. 53rd HY 3-411110% STUDENT DISCOUNT *ON $10 OR MOREALOHA NUIA hearty greeting from TIKITED who has brought a smallsample of delicacies from theSOUTH SEAS along with someof your favorite AMERICANdishes.TIKI TED BRINGS TO YOUSUCH DISHES AS:Beef Kabob Flambe, Teri Yaki,Ono Ono Kaukau, and Egg Roll,as well as T-Bone, Club andFilet Mignon Steaks, SeafoodDelight, Sandwiches, and ColdPlates.CIRAL5 HOUSE OF TIKI51ST A HARPERFood oorvod 11 a.m. to 3 a.m.LI 8-758SCAGO MAROONFiske Report To Be Made PublicCal ampus Prcsiden,s Meetat ucuThe Committee of the Coun-cil of the Faculty Senate hasapproved making public thecontents of the Fiske Commit-jee Report on ranking. The Univer¬sity is now in the process of print¬ing 0ver 1000 copies of the reportfor distribution to faculty and stu¬dents. , .The first 1000 copies will be sentto all members of the faculty and the rest of the copies will be avail¬able to students in the Student Gov¬ernment (SG) in about two weeks,according to Charles O’Connell, di¬rector of admissions and secretaryof the faculty senate.In the meantime, copies of thereport can be borrowed from theSG office and Dean of StudentsWarner Wick’s office.More copies of the report will beprinted if there is enough student interest, said O’Connell.In addition, O’Connell noted thata decision on whether or not torank undergraduate males thisyear for the Selective Service couldcome by mid-February, the nexttime the whole Council of the Fac¬ulty Senate meets. “February 14 isthe earliest possible date that theissue could come up,” he said, al¬though there is no guarantee it willcome.Classified Ads (Continued from Page Five)reaction to any future events equal¬ly crucial to all students.Following Monday’s rally, 5,000students called UCLA ChancellorMurphy from his office. He waspresented with four resolutionswhich had been passed unanimous¬ly by a yell at the rally:• no tuition,• no budget cuts,• a student-faculty voice inchoosing the new president,• a permanent student voice inthe university.Murphey endorsed the resolutionsTuesday afternoon.All campus presidents of all branches of the University of Cali¬fornia are currently meeting atUCLA to make plans for the forma¬tion of the California Federation ofStudents. Students running themeeting were initially concernedwith the role of political influence.According to one of the studentsat the convention, “All availableevidence suggests that the exerciseof political influence in the internalaffairs of the University was an im¬portant factor in the decision.”Mann said, however, that nostrong protests are being organized- “No one wants to antagonize thesituation. We’ll stay in classes be-mrnrnPERSONALS mmmm SSSf*?1 'V" “ * ** ► ,| ■.Hobbits: Come to Middle Earth Sunday.,t 1—call 831 or 145 BJ.LosF~Black umbrella w/auto. spring re-lease. in Swift courtyard Jan. 2,3. call262-5538.You've heard about us at Reynolds andread about us in the papers-now youhave a chance to hire us: The Ameri¬can Blues Dream Band. Call Miles924 7045 or Andy-Hitchcock 79Frustration? Sublimation! PleasurePrinciple! Categorical Imperative? Jamat Reynolds Club: American BluesDream'BAnd isio) Saturday, 8:30, 50c.Do Come.You don't have to go formal. JustWash!4 party to Remember*’, 8:30. Sat., atPHI PSI.__________Lcoture: JEWISH VISIONS' OF GODRabbi Nathan Gaynor, Hillel Directorat Univ. of Illinois. Friday Evening.8.30 pm Hillel House.\rt Exhibit now through 30 January.MEMORIAL EXHIBITION OF PHOTOGRAPHY by Prof. Hyman G. Lan¬dau, recently deceased faculty member,dept of mathematical biology. HillelHouse.Chad Mitchell at National College. 2840Sheridan Rd. Evanston. February 10, 8pm Admission: $3.50. KOINONIA: An evening at the TaizeCommunity, 4500 S. Greenwood. Ridesleave Chapel House at 5:30 and Bon-hoeffer House at 7:00. '58 Ford Wagon. R&W, power steer.Starts weU-$75. 752-7669.NON PARIOD HEADS: donate yourtrips to humanity through anonymousand confidential interview with psychol¬ogy student studying the use of LSD oncampus Call Slade Lander, 5447 Wood-. lawn, 324-3034.Whole bunches of fun'at typical partytonight.What type of party is most worth hav¬ing?One with music by the Bel-Airs!An Alph Delt rush party!8:30 pm tomorrow night.5747 S. University.Phi Sigma Delta cordially invites allfirst year men to a Smoker, Wed., Jan25 7:30 pm. 5625 S. Woodlawn.Dramatic reading of the Kama Sutra byDr A Weeri Sat. night. 9:30. 5625 Uni¬versity. Ecumenical Christian Council invites in¬terested persons to hear Dr. VictorYngue speak on Cybernetics and Its Im¬plications in Today’s World. Sun-Jan.29: 7:00 pm.: Brent House, 5540 S.Woodlawn.Kamelot Restaurant. 2160 E. 71st St.10% discount for UC students.Phi Delta Theta Rush Party. Sat. nightwith the Knights of Soul. 5625 Univ.An IMPULSE Ariseth on Feb. 11.Karate Club Members-don’t forget 1Karate Club Party this Sat. callUarga-324-4230 for details.What type of party is most worth hav¬ing? An ALPH DELT Rush Party.IMPULSE across the Mid-Way.Karate Club Members-don’t forgetKarate Club Party this S'at. callUarga-324-4230 for details.JOBS OFFEREDSITTER, Tues., Wed. and Fri. 9 am-noon $1.25/hr. 643-8022.Pt- typist-file clerk-to work in lg. re¬search library. Some college pref. MU4-4545.An experienced group worker 3-7 pm.wkdays to teach reading skills to chil¬dren aged 8-11; or an experienced pre¬school worker. Children’s Center 4808 S.Greenwood, call Sue Duncan, BU 8-6003at noon.Baby-sitter, M-W-F, 1:30-2:30 Feb. 13 on493-4061.FOR SALERosskopf Metal Skis-Kofix Bottom-190cm. $60. Koflach Boots-size 9-$25 poles$7 Package deal $80. call 363-2743.Interesting, challenging VW-1959 Radio.684-4733 evenings or weekends. Gibson C-6 Classical Guitar, new, withcase. Call 324-6730, evenings.1965 VW/black, sun roof, radio, heater.Excellent mechanical condition. 684.1544.Stereo record-player for immediatesale. Call R Nell ext. 3467 or 752-8174.1966 Volve P/22s. Beautiful condition.Extras. Priced to sell. 363-2593 or 663-8760Furniture; Skates size 4, 6, 7, 8. Call324-3496.TO RENTMale roommate wanted to share 5-roomapt. private room. etc. 2 blocks fromcampus. $33/mo. call BU 8-6803. NEW LIGHT ON LEGAL QUESTIONSWhen Americans Complainby Walter Gellhorn ....$3.95Ombudsmen and Othersby Walter Gellhorn $6 96Courts and Rightsbv John P. RocheGENERAL BOOK DEPARTMENTThe University of Chicago Bookstore5802 Ellis AvenueFern grad, student to share 6-rm. apt.Available immed. $47/mo. 324-3064.Room-mate wanted. $50 mo. own room,call 324-3385.2 male grad, students need 3rd. startingFeb. Spacious 7 rm. apt. 1635 E. 53rdst. BU 8-5553.2»/2 rm. apt. near 54th and Blkstone.$87/mo. call Len-667-4700 or 667-8768.2l,i rm. apt. in South Shore’s finestneighborhood. $109/mo. phone for appt.339-4873.Female room-mate wanted to sharelarge warm friendly apt. Own room.$60/mo Ideal loc. in Hyde Park, call643-7382.X AM-Korvette stereo amplifier. Gar¬rard R.C-88 changer. Both for $45.463-3585 or 521-0460 SAMUEL A. BELL'BUY SHELL FROM BELL"SINCE 1424PICKUP g DELIVERY SERVICE52 & Lake Park493-5200 WINTER SEMINAR SERIESThe New Morality:New? Moral?SUN., JAN. 29, 5:30-7:15Prof. Joseph Heroutuni.n will speak on"What is the New Morality?"BAPTIST GRADUATE STUDENT (ENTER4901 S. EllisPIZZA, PIZZA, PIZZA, PIZZANicky’s Pizza And Restaurant"ROYAL PIZZA BY NICKY THE UNCROWNED PIZZA KING"Fast Delivery Hot from the Oven 1208 EAST 53RD STREETC-VVWV%VVVVVVV^VW.WVW.VV,VVVV-VWV.VV^,^AVV^.V*WWS^.VlAV.%V.V»WVWiNICKY'S TAKE-OUT MENUi ftiiiu n, Assortments Small Medium LargeCHEESE 1.40 2.20 3.20SAUSAGE 1.65 2.50 3.50ANCHOVIE 1.65 2.50 3.50ONION 1.50 2.30 3.30PEPPER 1.65 2.50 3.50MUSHROOM 1.65 2.50 3.50BACON 1.75 2.60 3.60HAM 1.75 2.60 360CHICKEN LIVERS 1.75 2.60 360PEPPERONI 1.85 2.85.* ' l 3.85SHRIMP 2.00 3.00 4.00GROUND BEEF 1.65 2.50 3 50COMBINATION 2.50 3.75 5.00EXTRAS ADDED 35 .50 .75RIPE OLIVES EXTRA .... 35 .50 .75ONIONS EXTRA 15 .25 .35tf We Put Cheese on All Our PizzasWe serve Royal Crown Cola, Diet-Rite Cola and Nehi flavors. ; CallFA 4-5340January 27, 1967 • CHICAGO MAROON • 11IncentiveOf"Superby Syd UngerThe incentive behind theSuper Bowl game and the com¬bining of the two professionalfootball leagues was money—the money the players get fromplaying in the game and the moneythe club owners will save becausethere will no longer be free compe¬tition between the leagues tor col¬legiate players.TOMORROW, when UC has its“Super Saturday,’- pride will be theincentive. There will be manyalumni on campus Saturday and asmost “Big Ten" universities willtell you. it pays to keep your alum¬ni happy. Alumni are happy whentheir alma mater is victorious inathletic competition and if our ad¬ministration chose to do so it could“buy” all the athletes needed to in¬sure victory. If some of our alumniwatch the UC-Northwestern-WayneState meet in the Fieldhouse theywill see three fine midwesternteams in action—but there will beno professionals on the UC team.After dinner, at the QuadrangleClub, the alumni will proceed ‘enmasse’ to the Fieldhouse where theMaroons will take on a fine Tulaneteam (averaging 89.7 points pergame). The Tulane players havepride in their ability but for manyof them there will be the ‘little” jmatter of athletic scholarships to !think about. They may come here alittle overconfident—they’re “pro¬fessionals” and the team they facehas a 4 and 5 record.FOR THE MAROONS, however,this is the game of the year. A win |will make the season, which has jnot thus far fulfilled the hopes of Is PrideSaturday nmost Maroon fans, a successfulone. Undoubtedly. Tulane has to bethe favorite tomorrow but the sta¬tistics do not measure desire ormomentum.j In past years UC teams havemore than once been compared toj the New York Mets. TheMets. however, like amateur teams,never got cocky when they werewinning and never gave up whenthey were losing.The track team will take a per¬fect record (2 and 0) into this Sat¬urday’s dual meet. Last weekendCoach Ted Haydon’s team defeatedMcMaster and DePaul by scores of58-55 and 67-46 respectively.The UC team was paced by theefforts of John Beal (Long Jump,Triple Jump, Pole Vault, HighJump and Shot put), Marty Corne¬lius (70 Yd. High Hurdles, PoleVault, 70 Yd. Low Hurdles), JohnLehnhardt, Chuck Stanberry, BillEllet, Ken Thomas and Ted Terps-tra also contributed points to theChicago victories.UC'S HOPES this year are basedon returning letter winners such asPete Hildebrand, Chuck Stanberry,John Beal and Steve (“hope for thefuture”) Kojola. However, CoachHaydon said that the team “has apromising group of freshmen—alittle ‘green’ but rugged and en¬thusiastic.” Award DemarquePrize in AstronomyPierre Demarque, as associateprofessor of astronomy and astro¬physics here, has been awarded theHelen B. Warner Prize for Astrono¬my for 1967 by the Council of theAmerican Astronomical Society.This prize, which carries a cashaward of $500. is normally givenI annually for a significant contribu-| tion to astronomy during thepreceding five years. The recipientmust be a resident of North Ameri¬ca and under 35 years of age., In announcing the award, the So¬ciety described Demarque’s con¬tribution to astrophysics as beingi “the accurate calculation of detail¬ed models of late-type stars, suit¬able for critical comparison withobservation . . .“Demarque’s calculations furnishthe necessary theoretical basis forthe most reliable age determina¬tions of globular and old galacticclusters. They represent theoreticalwork of first rank.”Demarque is a member of (heAmerican Astronomical Society,the Royal Astronomical Society ofCanada and the International As¬tronomical Union. Since 1960, hehas been a frequent contributor tothe Astrophysical Journal.He received a B.S.C. at McGillUniversity (1955), and an M.A.(1957) and a Ph.D. (I960) at theUniversity of Toronto. Two UC Meteorologists Honored Wed.Dave Fultz and Tetsuya Fujita,both professors of meteorology inthe department of geophysical sci¬ences at UC, were honored Wednes¬day night by the American Meteo¬rological Society.Fultz received the Carl-GustafRossby Research Medal, named fora former meteorologist at UC.Friedman To SpeakOn TV Panel ShowMilton Friedman, Paul SnowdenRussell Distinguished Service Pro¬fessor of Economics, will be one ofsix panelists discussing lastmonth’s “Conference on the Draft" jon WTTW TV at 7 pm next Tues¬day.Friedman advocates the creationof an all-volunteer professional mil¬itary force. He would abolish thedraft, except for periods of nationalcrisis.Appearing on the show withFriedman will be five other partici- jpants from the three-day confer-1ence at UC. They are anthropoligistMargaret Mead. Colonel Dee In¬gold, special assistant to the direc¬tor of the Selective Service System,Charles C. Moskos, an assistant jprofessor of sociology at North¬western. John Mitrisin, researchassociate for the Institute for Poli¬cy Study in Washington, and Timo-!thy McGinley, a spokesman of theU.S. department of Labor. Fultz won the Medal for his workover the past 20 years in creatinglaboratory models of the largescale circulations of the atniosphere. Some of these models areused for determining the forceswhich produce cyclones.Fujita won the M e i s i n g e rAwarded, given annually for " research relating to aerologicalstudies. Fultz received the Meisinger Award in 1950.MEET YOURPERFECTDATE!You too can be amongst thethousands of satisfied adultsLet Dateline Electronics computers programmed for womenages 18 to 45 and men 18 to55. Take the guess work out ofdating.Continuous matching with anew expanded program with enrollment fees reduced to $3.00for adults ages 18 to 27, and$5.00 for adults over 27.Far quick results send for your questionnoire today. No obligation. Strictly con¬fidential.NameAddressCityDATELINE ELECTRONICRESEARCH INC. CMP O. Box 369, Chicago, IN.6064SFor Add. Info Call 271-3133God Lives!: Day Of WrathCarl Dreyer's masterpiece about witchcraft. At Doc Films tonight. Soc Sci 122, 59th &> Woodlawn.7th ANNUALUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGOrEORGE^ETILBALLCGINSittraM&SHAKHANDLESC YUNBLJ RUGGGRAMSK00KC0UNTGCO NVEffi °eMIJA KEDRST APLPLA NDRANDGEORGsiMR mYVONTIGNEMAGILLESSENEEARMSTR0KpNETI- DDYAMECAL SINONED&LVTLOSTICSAARDCINGERAUSCAJNGC HAROLD STEAIN BOYSBUDDYGUI CHARLESS EEGE RED&L0NN IEY0UNGSLESTERFL KIP JAMLLARDCHA NDLERTHE STAPLE SSINGERS ATT EARGS&THEF0 GGYM0UNT AINB0YSM AGICSAM& SHAKYJAK EGE 0RGMC0 00K C0U NTY VOCA LSIN GI NGION EST IL& 0RNA BALL KE NNSTEINN EVLOST CIT m BLER SA EsIANDREN EAUSCA JUN SKIP JAMKESEEGYGU IgTRAC LL? ^ARD ZTHEdler SB um JOSHCOUSWALTER INJATHEB KEHAR0LDEATLESMA STA&PAITH skipja MESE ARLS cruggspl A LSCEPECO NYET HGT0TLECHNC0HENjASSKETTOJ SDIRUGGRAENTOLDYPLNMIEVENING CONCERTS:JANUARY 27. 28. 29ALL SEATS RESERVED: $3.00. $2.50. $2.00AFTERNOON CONCERT:JANUARY 28, 3:00 PM.ALL SEATS RESERVED: $1.50; U.C. Students — $1.0012 • CHICAGO MAROON • January 27r 1967 TICKETS NOW ON SALE: MANDEl HALL BOX OFFICEGOOD SEATS STILL AVAILABLE <?a*