See scheduleof final examson page twoVolume 74—No. 55 The University of Chicago Tuesday, May 17, 1956 Pre-registration for thesummer and autumn quar¬ters, scheduled to begin onWednesday, has been post¬poned indefinitely.Protesters to leave ad buildingby David L. AikenThe protesters against ranking voted last night to end their sit-in in the administrationbuilding.By an overwhelming majority the group of several hundred students decided to pull outthe token force they had left last Friday evening after the original sit-in which began Wed¬nesday afternoon. The vote follow- —ed discussion of tactics and issues,featuring comment from seven fac¬ulty members on the draft anddemonstration methods.Issues still to be decided atpress time were whether to reen¬ter the administration building atsome point if their demands arenot met and details of a teach-inscheduled for tomorrow.Protesters against ranking leftthe administration building Mon¬day morning, leaving only a fewpeople at a literature table in thelobby. But the administrationdidn't come back.A check of the upper floors ofthe building revealed only a fewuniversity staff members in theiroffices Monday morning. Employ¬ees of the comptrollers office camein, only to go back out with boxesfull of papers and adding ma¬chines. It was learned they movedtheir operations to the basement ofthe Center for Continuing Educa¬tion.The public relations departmentwas operating but without secre¬taries, while the autonomous travelbureau on the first floor was openand conducting business. The bu¬rsar’s and registrar’s offices wereclosed.DEAN OF the College Wayne C. Not an administrator was stirring Monday morning as the adminis¬tration "sit-out" left the registrar's office deserted.2 ■■ MS. MM - * -iing, explained that as long as any ture table still represented a sit-in,protesters were in the building, the he said. No discussions could beBooth, in a sidewalk conversation administration considered that the held as long as it appeared thatwith students outside the ad build- sit-in was still going on. The litera- they were being held under “coer¬cion,” Booth said.“You can march around thebuilding, carrying picket signs.You can sit in front of the building—we’ll even provide tables andlounge chairs. But just move out ofthe building,” urged Booth.No plans to blockParticipants in the sit-in ex¬pressed surprise that the adminis¬tration would not come back. Theyhad not planned to block anybody’saccess to the building.At a meeting of the “executivecouncil” of the protesters SundaySG to sponsor draft votebetween May 18 and 25The Student Government (SG) assembly passed at a specialmeeting convened Friday afternoon a proposal to sponsor astudent referendum on a wide range of draft issues, includingthe controversial question of student ranking.An amendment to the originalproposal, which was approved mediate decision on the ranking is-Thursday afternoon by the SG ex- sue might lead to broader discus- Pl*0tGSt PrOtCStCQecutive council, limits the period sions 0n the entire issue of theduring which the referendum may draft,be held to Wednesday, May .18through Wednesday, May 25. AFTER AN AMENDMENT tohold the referendum between MayIT IS EXPECTED that further 20 and 27 was defeated, the amend-demonstrations by the anti-rank ment specifying the earlier timeprotesters would provoke the execto decide to hold the referendumon the earliest possible date, May18.At the Friday meeting JefferyBlum (Ind., College-at-large), sid¬ing with the protesters, explainedthat the question of ranking ismoral as well as political and thatthere has not been enough discus¬sion on it by the student body towarrant a referendum. period was approved.MMSee texts of SG referen¬dum and faculty senateproposals on page 7.Amendments to restrict voting to“I don’t see hov/ anybody can males and, more specifically, toreach a decision on an issue as undergraduate males were also de¬complex as this one this quarter,”he told the Assembly.DANNY feated.During further discussion on theBOGGS (Law School main proposal an attempt wasmade by assembly members sidingwith the protesters to postpone avote on the referendum by creatingthe lack of a quorum.Out of 45 assembly members,Party) later countered that theranking issue could not be ex¬tremely complex is the protesterswere able to figure it out in suchshort time. He also stated that themajority of University students ,. ,, i . ,? , however, 23 were present at thequesUon 8 * P * rum caU was disallowed by SO‘■A minority of the student body Tom Heagy.cannot make a decision for the THE PROPOSAL for the referen-whole body,” agreed Peter Sharf- dum in its amended form thenman (GNOSIS, Phys. Sci.), who passed by a vote of 19 to 9, with 2commented that, in view of the abstentions,government’s policy of drafting per- “I hope the referendum willsons who attempt to obstruct the serve as an alternative to the sit-inSelective Service system, the deci- as a mode of expressing studentsiou on ranking cannot be taken as opinion, one that will allow all stu-an individual matter.He added that he thought an im- dents to participate,” SG PresidentTom Heagy commented. Several faculty membershave expressed at least partialsupport for the administra¬tion’s decision not to re-enterthe ad building yesterday.Gerhard Meyer, associate pro¬fessor of economics, John Cooper,assistant professor of English andCollege humanities, and GrosvenorCooper, professor of music, bothsuggested that the administrationwas still feeling coercive pressurefrom the Students Against theRank.“The Friday evening studentstatement was very badly done,”stated Meyer. “It didn’t convinceanybody that the demonstrationwas over. “The administrationthought the sit-in was still goingon, and it was natural for them notto come back."I'M CAUTIOUSLY optimistic,”Meyer continued, “but anythingmight happen between now andTuesday, and a flare-up would bedisastrous. Right now the leader¬ship of both the faculty and the ad¬ministration are holding outagainst the hawks who want tothrow the students out.“I believe that intensive discus¬sion on all levels will come forth,”Meyer also said, “but not underthese circumstances. They will finda way of pushing talks withoutcaving in to student pressure.”John Cooper also expressed thebelief that the administration couldnot engage in negotiations under(Continued on page seven) night, it was decided to pull out allpeople and supplies except for aliterature table. If employeescame, they would be welcomed,and no work areas would beblocked.THE MAIN part of the 450 de¬monstrators who had been sittingin the building since Wednesdayafternoon left Friday evening, aft¬er a discussion of plans and goalslasting almost ten hours.Upon leaving, the protesters is¬sued a statement to “reiterate ouroriginal demands.” These werethat the University• “suspend its decision to rankin order to give those involved anopportunity for discussion;• “organize means by whichsuch debate can be facilitated;• provide a means by which thepower to make the decision can beturned over to the people whom itreally concerns—the faculty and,particularly, the students.”• Finally, they asked that “thiscommitment to the above threepoints be communicated at a jointpress conference of students, facul¬ty, and administration.”THE STATEMENT continued.“We are also maintaining our 24-hour a day sit-in in the administra¬tion building. However we shallpermit free access to and opera¬tion of the building by the adminis¬tration, as long as they act in goodfaith. At the same time, we intendto continue to use it as a forum forinformation and communicationabout our aims. Our presence inthe building further symbolizes ourdetermination, unity, and strength.We feel that we have established abargaining position by our three-day occupation of the building.“We consider this unilateral de¬cision rot to obstruct the operationof the building an act of goodfaith. The presumption underlyingour action to leave at this time isthat the administration will re¬spond similarly with an act ofgood faith. This will be de¬monstrated by their statementagreeing that students and facultywill be participants in deciding thisquestion. We intend to reconvenethe entire body next Wednesday(tomorrow, May 18) to evalutateour progress and to consider futureplans.”At 8 pm, the statement was readto the press. After the press con¬ference the demonstrators recon¬vened in the main lobby and de¬cided to end the total occupationof the building by marching enmasse on President Beadle’s houseand presenting him yith a copy ofthe prepared statement.Short marchA few minutes before 9 pm theLong awaited Phoenix lobe put on sale tomorrowThe Phoenix, UC’s long awaitedliterary magazine, will go on saletomorrow at major points on cam¬pus.George Walsh, this year’s Phoa-nix editor, said, “This is the resultof a year’s turnip squeezing.”Walsh thinks the squeezing mayhave been worthwhile, however,“The Phoenix has been carefullyplanned from cover to cover, thereare no advertisements, and nothingis out of place,” he said modestly.Contributions to the Phoenixhave been drawn from all parts ofthe University and the contents in¬clude fiction, poetry, graphics, andphotography.The Phoenix will cost 25c a copy.Deadline for copy for the Iasiissue of the Chicago LiteraryReview will ba Friday, May 20,All copy must ba in on that data. meeting voted to adjourn and thedemonstrators began leaving thebuilding by the east door, march¬ing down the quadrangles towardUniversity avenue and 58 street.Singing “We shall overcome” thefirst protestors to leave the build¬ing had reached the tennis courtsat University avenue before thelast demonstrators could get out.CARRYING SLEEPING bags,blankets, pillows, and books theyturned south on University ave¬nue. A feeling of emotional elationpervaded the 400 marching demon¬strators. Many of them had been inthe ad building more than fiftyfour straight hours, and now it wasover.The group gathered in the street(Continued on page three)Educators will fightcollege draft policyA committee of facultymembers of Chicago-area col¬lege protesting the present Se¬lective Service policy to draftstudents on the basis of classranks and test scores reportedFriday that among professorsin schools across the country“sentiment against the present pol¬icy is indeed widespread and deep¬ly felt.”The “Ad Hoc Faculty Committeefor an Educators’ Statement ofPrinciple on Selective Service” hasbeen collecting signatures of facul¬ty members who support a state¬ment calling for “as radical a sep¬aration of the activities of the se¬lective sei vice administration fromthe educational enterprise as possi¬ble.”At a press conference in theSheraton-Chicago hotel Friday,spokesmen for the committee re¬ported that, after only a shorttime, they had received almost 500names from over 50 collegesacross the country. They expectthe total to rise to between two andeight thousand in the next fewweeks.UC MEMBLWjof the committeeat the press ceefrrence were Rich¬ard Flacks, assistant professor ofsociology, and David Bakan, pro¬fessor of psychology. Facultymembers from DePaul, Illinois In¬stitute of Technology, and North¬western were also present.They announced that, if enoughfaculty members are able to at¬tend, a large convention will as¬semble in Washington the secondor third weekend in June, to deliv¬er the statement and signatures toSelective Service director, Gen.Lewis Hershey. At that time, apermanent organization would alsobe formed, to carry on an “educa¬tional campaign” to “seek achange in the present policy in theevent that such a change is not im¬mediately forthcoming.”THE SPOKESMEN noted thatthe administrations of 13 institu¬tions including UC, have so fartaken the position that no informa¬tion will be sent to draft boardsunless individual students specif¬ically request it.They commented, however, thatthis position “indicates the disquiettoward the present policy that ex¬ists among faculty and studentsand some administrators, and is anattempt to assuage this disquiet.However, it does not satisfy thepolicy implications of our state¬ment. By placing the responsibilityfor submitting information to draftboards on individual students, it inno way lessens the role of grades(Continued on page three)CLHIUKIALPuerility Letters to the edi BrIf there were any lingering suspicions that the administra¬tion is interested in constructive dialogue, there aren’t any bynow.They aren’t even interested in working.They are not going to return to their building until the lastprotester. is. out of the. building.We feel that the University’s position is clear. The onlyquestion remaining is: "What is the point?”Last week there was a point to the administration boycott.The 400 demonstrators had completely disrupted all attemptsto get University work done. Now that there is only a tokenoccupation of the building, there seems to be no earthly reasonwhy the administrators should not return to their jobs.To understand the present administration position, one hasto return to the sort of logic that small children use. Perhapsthey are afraid of the two little girls passing out literature onthe first floor. Or perhaps they just don’t want to talk aboutUniversity policy with those students who are most concernedabout it. We do not see that either of these reasons has anyforce.On the other hand, the administration may fear that the to¬ken occupation will again become a disruptive one. This maywell happen. But it is clear that a hypothetical second sit-in,like the first, could begin without any demonstrators in the adbuilding. Their fears are real, but irrelevant to the present sit¬uation. Two little girls are keeping one hundred "adult” ad¬ministrators at home.The administration terms the demonstration "coercion”; weterm the administration boycott of their own building "puerili¬ty”. The demonstrators’ demands are a statement of their bar¬gaining position. The three-day sit-in is itself a proof of theseriousness with which they take their position. Neither, nowthat the building is effectively unoccupied, can be construed asan attempt to stifle debate. But that is just what the boycott is.In Plato’s Gorgias, Callicles refused to continue the debatewith Socrates. But Gorgias and Polus, older, wiser men, insist¬ed that he continue, lest the debate be closed and the truth belost. The administration is now acting like Callicles; they re¬fuse to talk on a matter of great substance. We hope that thereare men at this University who will act as Gorgias and Polusdid, responsible faculty members who will not allow the ad¬ministrators to burke the debate.With the end of the disruptive sit-in, we had hoped that themeaningful dialogue which the Chicago tradition has alwaysfostered would soon get under way. It would be a pity to letadministration childishness vitiate this prime opportunity.i Final exam schedulei>, r<**r tThe time and place of examinations not listed below will be an¬nounced by instructors. Evening and Saturday classes, unless other¬wise announced by the instructor, will have examinations during regu¬lar class hours. Pleas* not* room assignments for examinations.Anthropology 210Art 240Art 250Biology 113Biology 114Biology 115Biology 117Biology 118Biology 119Biology 121Biology 150Biology 200Biology 203Botany 234 tlChinese 203—OH 252Chemistry 107Chemistry 117Chemistry 133Chemistry 222Chemistry 243Chemistry 263Economics 203 01Economics 260Economics 291—Soc. Sci. 242 Sec-FBEnglish 218 91 /English 220English 226English 237English 238 91English 241English 244English 255English 263English 276English 280English 287English 295French 101-2-3French 102-3French 104-5-6French 201French 203French 205French 209French 217Geography 202Geography 205Geography 257Geophysical Sciences 133Geophysical Sciences 225Geophysical Sciences 229Geophysical Sciences 268Geophysical Sciences 274Geophysical Sciences 283German 102-3German 103German 106German 232German yfGreek ,04 ftGrsek 2r. Wick wicked' tf/t Vice suPP°rt for a delay in ranking until ize that this decision might wellr a real dialogue had taken place, end die chance for any future deci-no meaningful dialogueCHICAGO M Mon June 6 10:30-12:30 RY 251Mon June 6 8-10 CL 10Fri June 10 1:30-3:30 CL 10Mon June 6 10:30-12:30 SFL 8Wed June 8 1:30-3:30 SFL 8Thur June 9 4-6 E 203Thur June 9 4-6 HHB 134AThur June 9 8-10 SFL 8Fri June 10 10:30-12:30 SFL 6Wed June 8 8-10 RKSN 1Tues June 7 12:30-2:30 K 107Wed June 8 8-10 B 106Mon June 6 8-10 S 208Tue June 7 4-6 B 206Wed jjne 8 1:30-3:30 CL 10Wed June 8 8-10 K 107Wed June 8 8-10 K 107Wed June 8 8-10 K 103Thur June 9 8-10 K 103Thur June 9 10:30-12:30 E 133Mon June 6 6-10 K 103Mon June « 8-10 SS 108Thur June 9 1-10 CL 10Tue June 7 4-6 RO 26Tue June 7 4-6 WB 202Wed June 8 8-10 CL MFri June 10 10:30-12:30 CL 16Wed June 8 1:30-3:30 CL 16Thur June 9 1:30-3:30 CL 16Thur June 9 4-6 WB 103Tue June 7 4-6 CL 11Tue June 7 12:30-2:30 CL 16Mon June 6 10:30-12:30 CL 11Fri June 10 1:30-3:30 CL 16Thur June 9 4-6 CL 11Vion June 6 10:30-12:30 WB 233Fri June 10 8-10 CL 20Mon June 6 1:30-4:30 K T07Mon June 6 1:303:30 K 107Mon June 6 1:30-4:30 CL 10Mon June 6 .1:30-3:30 RY 358Fri June 10 4-6 K 107Tue June 7 12:30-2:30 WB 202Fri June 10 1:30-3:30 WB 103Mon June 6 8-10 WB 206Mon June 6 10:3012:30 RO 41Fri June 10 10:30-12:30 RO 28Mon. June 6 10:30-12:30 RO 27Wed June 8 8-10 RO 27Thur June 9 4-6 W 204Fri June 10 10:30-12:30 RO 33Wed June 8 •10:30-12:30 W 1 NWed June 9 1:30-3:30 RO 26Fri June 10 1:30-3:30 RO 39Mon June 6 1:30-3:30 IMHMon June 6 1:30-3:30 L M HWed June 8 1:303:30 WB 103Fri June 10 10:30-12:30 WB 202Mon June 6 8-10 WB 203Fri June 10 10:30-12:30 BE 24Mon June 6 1:30-3:30 SS 108A R O O N • May 17, 1966 TO THE EDITOR:In the past two weeks, twomeaningful demonstrations haveoccurred which, despite the diver¬sity of housing and class rank, es¬pouse a common principle: theUniversity of Chicago’s communityof scholars is a fantasy. The muchtouted dialogue amongst faculty,students, and administrators is thebig li*. The publicity statementsassure us free discussion takesplace, while in reality decisionsare revealed only after becoming afait accompli.Dean of Students Warner Wick,whose classic view of the adminis¬trator befits a mediocre multiver¬sity, must now realize that the en¬tire student body is unwilling topropagate the big lia. In his speechat the housing protest, Wick againpaid lip service to student opinion,citing his personal concern wit>student grievances and ideas.A few days later, James W.Vice, when questioned in regard tofacilities for incoming studentsshould dorm space prove insuffi¬cient, replied "Well, we have a se¬cret facility which we don’t wish todiscuss publicly.” It is heartwarm¬ing to find the administration sotremendously responsive to studentdemands for a greater voice inhousing decisions.In light of the policy statementissued by the anti-rank forces, it seems also weary of the big li*.Dean Wick’s elaborate subterfugemust soon come tumbling down,for we now realize that student dis¬cussion means nothing if there isto be no student decision. Indeed,it now appears incumbent uponDean Wick to either abandon hismonolithic stand on student influ¬ence in policy making, or to resignfrom the position of power whichhe has used to frustrate the trueinterests of a “community of schol¬ars.” In his singular concern forhandling students rather than at¬tempting to solve the problemswhich they protest, he has demon¬strated an unpardonable concernfor tranquility rather than im¬provement at the University ofChicago.If we are to truly establish thecommunity of scholars which thedeans delight in quoting, we woulddo well to notice the collegeswhere such a community exists.Reed, Goddard, Antioch, et. al.,where students have a significantvoice in policy making, are bestcharacterized as small colleges. Inview of this fact, enlargement ofthe undergraduate body is a dubi¬ous question. Naturally enoughthis decision was never discussedby the community as a whole, butostensibly accepted in the generalhosannahs for a $160 million funddrive. Can we ever expect toachieve the community of scholarsand significant dialogue with athousand entering students? Do weagain appears evident that the ab- not now painfully realize that suchsence of a student voice in policy an increase jeopardizes our al-making was a major cause of dis- ready questionable status as acontent. The faculty, in view of the small college? Do we not also real-Hijtory 131-2-5History 133History 213History 223History 233History 239 81 1 MHistory 247—Soc. Sci. 247History 253History 263History 273 *1Humanities VI3AHumanities 113BHumanities 123Humanities 203Humanities 285—Music 2*3Humanities 286—1 & M 213Ideas !• Methods 213—Hum 286Ideas & Methods 253Italian 101-2-3Italian 205Japanese 203—OH 253Japanese 250—OC 220Latin 10QLatin 206Latin 259Linguistics 222—Anthro 372Mathematics 102 EAMathematics 103 CAMathematics 103Mathematics 151 41Mathematics 152 12AAalhenrvatics 152 21Mathematics 152 32Mathematics 152 51Mathematics 053 21Mathematics 153 31Mathematics 153 32Mathematics 153 41Mathematics 153 42Mathematics 153 31Mathematics 153 41Mathematics 153 71Mathematics 203 21Mathematics 204 11Mathematics 205 11Mathematics 205 12Maihematics 251 41Mathematics 251 41Mathematics 252 31Mathematics 253 41Mathematics 253 43Mathematics 261 51Mathematics 275 *1Mathematics 280 11Mathematics 285Music 153Music 203Music 213Music 233Music 205—Hum 283Oriental History 203Philosophy 210Philosophy 233Philosophy 251 91Physical Sciences 107Physics 113Physics 123Physics 133Physics 216Physics 218Physics 223Physics 227Political Science 205Political Science 238Psychology 203Psychology 205Psychology 231Russian 103Russian 203Russian 206Russian 259Russian 275Russian 298Social Sciences 111-24Social Sciences 123Social Sciences 222—OH 262Social Sciences 232—OH 272Social Sciences 242Social Sciences 247—Hist 247 Tom June 7 8:3001:30 L M HTue* June 7 8:30-10:30 L M HFri June 18 1:303.30 RO 27Mon Jon* 8 8-10 SS 305Thur June 9 4-6 RO 26Fri June 10 10:3012:30 RO 2Wed June 8 4-6 S 200Thur June 9 4-6 SS 105Mon June 6 0-10 RO 2Wed June 8 1:30-3:30 RO 2Wed June 8 10:3012:30 L M HWed June 8 10:3012:30 K 107Wed June 8 4-6 L M HWed June 8 10:3012:30 E 133Fri June 10 4-6 K 103Tue June 7 4-6 CL 10Tue June 7 06 CL 10Mon June 6 10:3012:30 LAW CMon June 6 1:304:30 RO 27Fri June 10 1:303:30 WB 102Wed June 0 1:303:30 OR 210Fri June 10 10:3012:30 OR 226Mon June 6 8 10 CL 26Fr! June 1# 0:303:30 CL 26Tues June 7 44 CL 76Mon June 6 10:30-12:30 CL 16Tue June 7 12:302:30 E 308Fri June 10 10:3012:30 E 207Thur June 9 1:30-3:30 L M HFri June 10 1:303:30 S 201Thur June 9 1-10 E 207Mon June 6 8 10 E 305Thur June 9 4-6 E “>07Tue June 7 12:302:30 E 207Mon June 6 8-10 RY 251Fri June 10 10:30*12:30 Z 14Thur June 9 4-6 E 312Fri June 10 1:303:30 E 305Thur June 9 1:303:30 E 207Tue June 7 12:302:30 K 103Wed June 0 1:303:30 E 207Thur June 9 1:303:30 K 103Mon June 6 0-10 E 308Wed June 8 8-10 E 207Wed June 8 8-10 RY 358Mon June 6 10:30-12:30 E 206Fri June 18 1:30-3:30 E 207Fri June 10 0-10 E 207Fri June 10 10:3012:301:303:30 E 206Fri June 10 RY 251Fri June 10 1:303:30 RY 358Tue June 7 12:302:30 E 203Mon June 6 1:303:30 E 308Wed June 0 1-10 E 308Wed June 8 10:30-12:30 E 207Tue June 7 8-10 MUS 101Mon June 6 MO MUS 201Wed June 8 10:3012:30 MUS 201Mon June 6 ■-10 MUS 101Fri June 10 46 K 103Wed June • 10:3012:30 RY 251Tue June 7 4-6 CL 18Fri June 10 4-6 CL 16Fri June 10 8-10 RO 27Mon June 0 10:30-12:30 B 106, -RO 2AB 101, CLIOAB 133Mon June 6 10:3012:30 E 133Wed June 8 1:303:30 E 133Mon June 6 8-10 E 133Fri June 10 1:303:30 E 202Fri June 00 10:3012:30 E 203Wed June 8 1:303:30 E 203Thur June 9 4-6 E 202Fri June 10 1:303:30 E 308Thur June 9 00:30-12:30 WB 103Thur June 9 4-6 RO 2Tues Jun* 7 4-6 RO 2Mon June 6 8-10 S 106Mon June 8 1:303:30 iRO 2Mon June 6 8-10 RO 27Fri June 10 10:3012:30 CL 20Wed June 8 1:303:30 CL 20Mon June 6 8-10 B 106Wed June 8 MO S 106Tue June 7 £6 L M HThur June 9 10:3012:30 L M HFri June 10 10:3012:30 SS 108Fri June 10 4-6 E 206Thur June * 1:303:30 RO 2Wed June 6 4-6 S 208(Continued on page seven) sions being reached by the commu¬nity as a whole?The enlargement of the Collegeis the first question which must beturned over to the entire communi-issue on which the feasibility 0f fu¬ture community decisions rests.The time when University officialscould hope to placate studentsthrough sterile discussions on de¬cided issues has ended. Perhapsthe era of the great dialogue andcommunity of scholars at the Uni¬versity of Chicago will now com¬mence.MEL WALDFarnell sees coercionin University decisionsEditors Mote: The following letterW'<w addressed to President GeorgeW. Beadle, and has also been madeavailable for publication in the Ma¬roon.I am In receipt of your circularletter of 12 May. In that letter arecertain statements about coercion,free inquiry and discussion whichin context bear a meaning whichseems to me questionable. I amengaged in teaching students aboutthe nature of the democratic proc¬ess, and I believe the ideas youexpress in your letter and themethod by which University policyhas recently been formed conflictwith the true meaning of demo¬cratic process in the United Statesand other liberal countries. Theyconflict in such a manner as to un¬dermine the teaching endeavoursof myself and other members ofthe faculty at this University: anendeavor which you rightly sayshould be the aim of the Universityadministration.It seems to me that the studentsmay properly argue that they arebeing coerced by the unilateral de¬cision of the University adminis¬tration about grade ranking.What real discussion has takenplace before the University admin¬istration made its decision? TheUniversity itself has no use for arank order of students and there¬fore no interest beyond the generalconcern it may have about the re¬lationship of a private educationalinstitution and the United Statesgovernment. Recently, the admin¬istration made a notable dissentfrom government policy on the is¬sue of loyalty oaths. On the matterof constructing a class rank theUniversity might not wish to take asimilar position. But the studentsare evidently vitally interested inthe matter of class ranking. Whydidn’t the administration solicittheir opinion and advice by a ref¬erendum? Surely this would havebeen the most effective means ofcarrying on rational discussionwith the students and allowing theeducational activity of the Univer¬sity to continue on the best possi¬ble base.Discussion with the students hasgone on in only a very partial way.The same is true of discussion withthe faculty. Granted that a smallgroup of the faculty who have aconstitutional position have beenconsulted. Yet it is stated in yourmemorandum of 9 May that manymembers of the faculty have viewsdivergent from that of the Commit¬tee of the Council of the Senateand the administration. Surely dis¬cussion with the whole Senatewould have been more appropriate.I have joined with other facultymembers in requesting such ameeting.The conduct of the Universityadministration in this instance ispart of a general trend at this in¬stituting—particularly in the reor¬ganized College—to substitute fordemocratic participation and dis¬cussion the principal of central de*cision making and direction. Ithink this is unfortunate and sub*versive of our educational enter¬prise; the present disorders in thoadministration building are butone manifestation of this unfortu¬nate tendency. May we not reaf¬firm our belief in democratic dis¬cussion and decision making?JAMES E. FARNELLASST. PROF. OF HISTORY ANDSOCIAL SCIENCESAd building nearly empty►'Or, r>r ‘tf v* (Continued from page one)across from Beadle’s house on Uni¬versity avenue and four leaderswalked up to Beadle's door andrang the bell. Nobody answeredthe door, even though there were aconsiderable number of lightsturned on in the house, so the peti¬tion was slipped under the door.The student protestors then dis¬persed in all directions, with asmall number returning to the ad¬ministration building to continue atoken vigil.University reaction announcedIn reaction to the Friday eveningstatement of the demonstrators,this statement was released Mon¬day by Walter V. Leen, UC legalcounsel: “The University of Chica¬go has been handed the attachednotice from those sitting in the Ad¬ministration Building. The Univer¬sity of Chicago will not resume op¬erations in the building under thesecircumstances.”Representatives of the adminis¬tration and the Committee of theCouncil of the Faculty Senatepointed to statements by the de¬monstrators that the sit-in is beingmaintained, and said that the ad¬ministration therefore will not re¬turn to an “occupied” building.Begin to button-hole facultyBefore leaving Friday evening,the anti-rank protesters decided toinitiate a “massive campaign tocontact every member of the facul¬ty and explain our position tohim.” A file of names and address¬es of faculty members was main¬tained in the protestors’ table inthe ad building, where studentscould sign up to see a facultymember. A quick check throughthe file indicated that a large pro¬portion of the faculty were beingcontacted.ON SATURDAY evening, ameeting was held to discuss the ar¬guments these students were likelyto encounter, and counterargu¬ments were suggested and debat¬ed. The arguments and refutationswere summarized and printed in apamphlet which was distributed inthe dorms Sunday.Also Saturday a new executivebody, elected the previous night,drew up a press statement differ¬ent from the one issued Fridaynight and left in Beadle’s door thesame evening. The second state¬ment emphasized the dual natureof the protest: against the adminis¬tration’s arbitrary decision torank, a question the group consid¬ers to be outside administrativejurisdiction; and against the rankitself, which the protestors believeis an invidious instrument of anunjust system.Sunday strategy sessionThe executive council recon¬vened Sunday night, to discuss thecourse of action for Monday morn¬ing. After they had decided toclear out except for a literature ta¬ble, discussion turned to the ques¬tion of whether they should contin¬ue their 24-hour-a-day “token” sit-in at the administration building,or move their headquarters to an¬other building near campus, wherethey could more easily attract fac¬ulty and administrators to comein and discuss issues with them.Eric Gangloff, a student parti¬cipating in the sit-in, began phon¬ing every place near campus thatcould conceivably accomodate themore than 150 persons present atthe meeting. The most likely spotappeared to be the center for con¬tinuing education.ACCORDING TO Sol Tax, pro¬fessor of anthropology and dean ofthe University extension division,which operates the center, he hadoffered the use of the large assem¬bly room for meetings, and thepress room for publicity opera¬tions, when a protestor had con¬tacted him for support Sunday aft¬ernoon.“I made the offer in order togive them a place to go so theycould get the thing out of the adbuilding and get it into the discus¬sion stage,” Tax said. He ex¬plained that he had made his offercontingent on the end of the sit-inat the administration building, al¬though this was evidently not un¬derstood by the demonstrators atfirst.“It wouldn’t do any good tomove part of the demonstration tothe center but keep the rest in the administration building,” Tax said,“because I knew the administra¬tion would not agree to do anytalking until they got completelyout of the ad building.”Need approval of full bodyMany students at the meetingexpressed opinions that they shouldleave the building, but threaten toreturn Wednesday unless the ad¬ministration acceded to their de¬mands.These two students kept severalhundred administrators, secre¬taries, and clerical workers fromreporting to work yesterdaymorningIt was ultimately concluded thatthe executive council itself did nothave authority to decide upon anexit from the building, since theoriginal group of 450 protestors hadgiven the smaller group a mandateto remain in the building untilWednesday, when the full groupwould meet again. It was felt, how¬ever, that this decision should bemade earlier, so last night’s meet¬ing was approved to discuss thecourse of action.AT SUNDAY night’s meeting,several faculty members appealedto the group to leave so that dis¬cussions could take place with ad¬ministrators and faculty ‘'‘withoutcoercion.”James M. Redfield, assistantprofessor on the committee on so¬cial thought and master of the“fifth college,” and Herman Sinai-ko, assistant professor of humani¬ties in the college, appeared firstto urge the students to leave.Redfield pointed out that the“symbolic” token sit-in actuallyamounted to a “declaration of con¬tinued presence,” and was con¬strued as a continuation of the sit-in by administrators even thoughstudents might have intended it tobe a “concession.”Redfield also told the protestorsthat they would probably find itimpossible to limit the “token”force to just 25, as they planned,since supporters would be attract¬ed to the building and spread allaround it. This would upset manyemployees of the building, he said,such as “65-year-old ladies whoaren’t used to having studentsaround.” He mentioned that onWednesday, when the sit-in began,there were some incidents in whichangry employees came close toforcefully evicting some protestors.(A mimeographed notice wasposted in work areas of the build¬ing Monday morning by the de¬monstrators, apologizing for anyinconvenience the employees mighthave suffered.)Committee sends representativesLater, three representatives ofthe committee of the council of thefaculty senate arrived from ameeting of the committee.Alan Gewirth, professor of philo¬sophy, Roger Hildebrand, professorof physics, and Harry Roberts,professor in the business school,said they had come to offer stu¬dents a part in discussions on theissues of the draft.HILDEBRAND, who said he hadbeen designated official spokesmanfor the committee, said, “I and themajority of my colleagues on thecommittee and the council are con¬cerned about the draft. We wouldlike to discuss how we’re goingabout this debate. We invite thisgroup to come to us with sugges¬tions on how we can go about dis¬cussing the matter.”He added, however, that he couldnot promise any immediate changein the decision by the council ofthe senate, approving the presentpolicy of releasing grades and ranks upon permission of the stu¬dent involved.GEWIRTH, HOWEVER, saidthat “the official interpretation ofthe council’s action is that this isnot a final decision; it is open tofurther discussion. The council’squestion is how this discussion willgo on.”Willing to seek draft changeHildebrand said, in answer to aquestion, “Whether you continue todemonstrate or not, the chancesthat the university will reverse theexisting policy in the next monthor so is very low; but the chanceof the university taking part in aneffort to change the over-all draftpolicy is very good.”Hildebrand called on the studentsto leave the building, saying, “Idon’t like to carry on a debate onsomething as important as thedraft under any kind of threat.”IN RESPONSE to the presenta¬tion of the committee representa¬tives, several students expressedpuzzlement over just what theywere offering, since they had de¬clined to promise any immediatechange jn the ranking policy.Unanimous gratitude was express¬ed for their visit, however.Hildebrand told the Maroon yes¬terday, “We didn’t go there expect¬ing any great or dramatic thingwould be accomplished, but thediscussion was useful. I learnedsomething about the intensity offeeling of the group and the prob¬lems of solving this to everybody’ssatisfaction.”Pay for employees?While employees working in theadministration building were tak¬ing the day off, they were worry¬ing about getting paid for the daysthey had been shut out. The Ma¬roon contacted the comptroller’soffice-in-exile at the center for con¬tinuing education, and was told allpaychecks would be ready by Fri¬day, the regular bi-weekly payday. All employees would be paidfor the days missed on account ofthe sit-in, the office reported. How¬ever, Student Government presi¬dent Thomas Heagy reported thatprovost Edward H. Levi had toldhim that employees paid on anhourly basis would not be paid forthe days missed.Draft exam debuts“It was easy,” said one UC stu¬dent after completing the draft de¬ferment qualification test on Satur¬day. The three-hour exam, similarin format to the Scholastic Apti¬tude Tests, was administeredthroughout the country last week.Test sites in the Chicago areasaw scattered picketing and a fewincidents involving finger-printingbut no major disturbances. Admin¬istration of the test proved gener¬ally uneventful, and most studentsappeared satisfied that they hadachieved at least the passing gradeof 70. Columbia prof A. Doak Barnett to talkon US and China before UC study groupA. Doak Barnett, ColumbiaUniversity professor of gov¬ernment, will speak oh “TheUnited States and China,”Friday as this month’s public ses¬sion of the academy for policystudy. The lecture will be held at4:30 pm in the law school.Barnett, acting director of theEast Asian Institute at Colombia,testified before the Senate foreignrelations committee on March 8.At that time he urged the UnitedStates government to proclaim itswillingness for diplomatic recogni¬tion, increase trade, and support a“two Chinas” policy.Barnett was born in China in1921 and lived there until 1936. Hereceived his BA and MA from YaleUniversity. During the civil warbetween the Communists and thenationalists he reported fromChina as a correspondent for theChicago Daily News.He has published a number ofbooks on China including China onthe Eve of Communist takeover;Communist China, the EarlyYears: 1949-55; and CommunistAd policy backed(Continued from page one)the present circumstances. “Con¬tinued student presence would beregarded as an obvious threat,” hestated.“It serves as a constant remind¬er that last week’s tactics mightbe used again. The administrationmight well say that the conditionsof last week haven’t reallychanged.“The students’ tactics will con¬tinue to hamper free discussions,”he said, “I am at least sympatheticwith what the administration isdoing.”GROSEVENOR Cooper also indi¬cated his feeling that the adminis¬tration was doing all it could underthe present circumstances. “Theyare absolutely right,” he stated.“It would be a horrible error tomake arrests, and as for going intoday, that would be a waste oftime.”“This is a kind of Gandhi passiveresistance on the administration’spart,” he continued. “They arestuck with that policy no matterwhat happens. At this point practi¬cally anything anyone does is amistake.”At least one faculty member,however, expressed support for thestudent position. Richard Flacks,associate professor of sociology,stated, “My hope was that the ad¬ministration would see what thestudents did for what it was—anaction which ended the coercionand expressed faith in the deliber¬ative process. I’m disturbed thatthey didn’t see it that way.” Columbia's BarnettlChina and Asia: Challang* toAmerican Policy.In addition to the public lectureBarnett will meet with studentsand faculty during the day to dis¬cuss his research on local govern¬ment and politics in mainland Chi¬na.This is the third in a series ofmonthly sessions being held by theacademy for policy studying China.This study will continue until Feb¬ruary, 1967 at which time twoconferences will provide an overallappraisal of modern China.Consent on rankingnot individual right(Continued from page one)in draft deferment. In fact, somedraft boards have notified studentsthat they are subject to draft delin¬quent status unless they assumethe responsibility for having theirgrades submitted.”THE COMMITTEE spokesmencommended the policy of SanFrancisco state college, whichdoes not calculate class ranks, butallows a student’s transcripts to besent upon that student’s request.Maxwell Primack, of IIT, said,“We will try to expose the fallacyof those who argue that each per¬son should have the right to decidewhether to send in ranks. Every¬body is counted into a rank; no¬body has a ‘choice’ whether hisgrades are going to be countedinto the ranking.”He continued, “I wouldn’t be tooconcerned about those who supportthe war but don’t want to fight,that is, who aren’t willing to havetheir grades sent in.”THE PHOENIXUniversity Of Chicago’s StudentLiterary Magazinewith poems, short stories, graphics and photosWill Qo On SaleWednesday, May 18,1966At The University Bookstore,Dormitories, andMandel HallMay 17, 1966 • CHICAGO MAROON • 3Protest analysisStudent decision-making is basic issue in sit-in demonstrationby Mike Seidman(Editor's note: Mike Seidman coveredlast week’s sit-in for the Maroon.The following is his personal assess¬ment of the sit-in and the issues be¬hind it.)It will take a long time be¬fore administrators, students,and faculty can recover suffi¬ciently from last week’s in¬flammatory statements and janglednerves to find out exactly what hashappened to the University of Chi¬cago. It was a very strange week,and the weeks to come promise tobe even stranger, for the demon¬stration is far from over, and stu¬dents and administrators remainin eyeball-to-eyeball confrontationover an issue which is far morecomplex than either side appearedto realize before the demonstrationbegan last Wednesday.But if the contest remains unde¬cided. and the issues unclear, cer¬tain things have emerged from lastweek’s bizarre marathon inside theadministration building. First andperhaps most important, evenWarner Wick should realize by nowi. Talking to yourself?Rehearsing a speech.I’m running forPresident of theStudent Council.fl. What’s your platform?Do I need one? that the sit-in was definitely notthe “biggest social event of theyear.”The administration’s traditionalpolicy of allowing students to“blow off steam” has quite ob¬viously become obsolete. It wasenough to allow students to enterHutchinson Commons for thedance-in and let girls sign out tothe flag pole for the sleep-in, but itwas quite evidently not enough topermit demonstrators to have theadministration building to them¬selves for three days. Clearly, theproblem the administration facesis far too deep-seated for this kindof “sit tight” strategy, and, al¬though the veil of silence whichhas surrounded administration pol¬icy since the sit-in began makes itimpossible to determine what plansthey have, it is likely that they areprepared to abandon their tradi¬tional stance of benevolent intran¬sigence.SECOND, despite the imcressioncreated by the mass media, thisdemonstration was not about Viet¬nam. the draft, or even ranking.Nowhere in the student four-point2. Angela’s idea?She says it will helpme develop a senseof responsibility.4. You have to give people areason for voting for you.How about “A chickenin every pot”?5. Already been used.“Tippecanoe andTyler too”? 0. Look, if you want to showAngela you’re responsible,why not sign up for LivingInsurance from Equitable.It’s one of the mostresponsible things you cando —because Living Insurancewill give your wife and kidssolid protection.“I would rather beright than 1’resident."For information about Living Insurance, see The Man from Equitable,lor career opportunities at Equitable, see your Placement Officer, orwrite: Patrick Scollard, Manpower Development Division.EQUITABLE Life Assurance Society of the United StatesHone Office 1285 Ave. of the Americas, New York, N. Y. 10019 CEquitable 1965An Equal Opportunity Employer program is the administration spe¬cifically asked not to rank its stu¬dents, and attempts to incorporatesuch a demand were decisivelyvoted down at the mass meetinglast Friday. Undoubtedly, virtuallyall the demonstrators are opposedto the ranking system, and the adhoc group has said as much in astatement released Saturday. Butalthough they make quite cleartheir belief that ranking is wrong,they continue to demand only a de¬lay in instituting a rank until chan¬nels have been established for adecisive student voice in the deci¬sion.It is this demand for a voice inUniversity decision making that isthe key to the sit-in. Point three ofthe demonstrator’s program asksthe administration to “provide ameans by which the power tomake the decision can be turnedover to the people whom it reallyconcerns—the faculty and partic¬ularly, the students.” It is nocoincidence that this demonstrationfollowed the housing sleep-in byonly a week, that many of the or¬ganizers of the two movementswere the same, and that even thesame slogans were used by bothgroups. The same basic issue—the students’ role in decisions atUC—was involved, and it is anissue which transcends the specificstudent demands. Clearly, if it hadnot been ranking, it would havebeen something else, for the ques¬tion of a decisive voice for studentsin administrative decisions seemsto have a life all its own, quiteapart from the specific issues stu¬dents wish to decide.THE NATIONAL MEDIA weremuch closer to the truth when they compared the sit-in to the Berkeleydemonstrations of two years ago,although it does appear to be coin¬cidental that one of the leaders ofthe protesting group, Jackie Gold¬berg, was active in the Berkeleymovement. Like the Chicago move¬ment, the Berkeley protests werefar more deeply seated than theoriginal free speech demandswould seem to indicate. Almost allcommentators have recognized bynow that the protests had as theirbasis the alienation of studentsfrom administrators that occurs ina large university. The Berkeleystudents were not so much oppos¬ed to prudishness and WilliamKnowland as they were to the im¬personally of their institution andClark Kerrs much touted andmuch abused “multiversity” con¬cept.What makes the demonstrationof the past week so important isthat although it emerged fromwhat has become the Berkeley tra¬dition, it went significantly beyondBerkeley in its demands. For what¬ever its faults, clearly the Univer¬sity of Chicago is not a multiversi¬ty. The figure is somewhat mis¬leading, but it is nevertheless truethat the ratio of students to facultyin this institution is only six to one,and anyone who wishes to talk toan administrator need only knockon Dean Wick’s door.BUT ALTHOUGH talking to ad¬ministrators was all that Berkeleystudents demanded, it is quite ob¬viously not enough for the demon¬strators of last week. In fact, therehas been a substantial revoltagainst traditional channels ofcommunication with the admini¬stration—against what one demon-READ FASTERREMEMBER MORETHIS SUMMER, IMPROVE YOUR READING ABILITY AT THEROOSEVELT UNIVERSITYREADING INSTITUTEReturn to campus next fall able to understand more ccmplete-ly, concentrate better, remember more, read more quicklyand efficiently.THE READING INSTITUTE offers:i.2.3.4. Individual attention. There are no classes at THE READ¬ING INSTITUTE. Each student learns at his own pace,according to his own rate of development. A program isdesigned on the basis of extensive test before enroll¬ment, and planned flexibly as he progresses.Emphasis on reading comprehension. Our research over27 years shows that better comprehension opens the wayto faster reading and better recollection, as well asdeeper understanding. Our goal is increased speed ofhigh comprehension.Parmanant improvement. Reading habits must be changedfor progress to be permanent. The summer program con¬sists of 25 sessions — three months of twice-weekly two-hour sessions — to change reading habits end reinforcethe new habits. All work is done at THE READING IN¬STITUTE: there is no homework.Convenient hours. Because all work is individual, thestudent is not confined to a class schedule. Appoint¬ments are available Monday through Saturday, includingsome evenings.Low cost. Despite the length of the course and the in¬dividual attention, THE READING INSTITUTE course costs■ only $175, plus $15 for the initial diagnostic testing. Apayment plan is available.For Further Information or an Appointment,Write or Call:The Reading Institute ofROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY176 West Adams Street, Chicago, Illinois MootPR 2-0770 strator called Mike Klowdenism, Inreference to a traditional “studentleader.” What the demonstratorsappear to be moving towards is ademand for an end to the adminis¬tration hierarchy and a decentral¬ized, student-faculty dominatedbody to take its place — a kind of“participatory democracy” on theUniversity level.What makes the sit-in so signifi¬cant is the fact that students nowappear to be incredibly close toachieving their goals. It is incon¬ceivable that the administrationwill completely capitulate, but itnow appears likely that the Facul¬ty Senate will be convened, andthat when it is students will benegotiating from a position ofstrength.Unfortunately, the situation iscomplicated by the past commit¬ments of both sides. After their de¬cisive and seemingly victoriousconfrontation with the adminis¬tration last week, protest leaderswill find it hard to back down fromtheir demands. Similarly, the ad¬ministration's repeated assertionthat it will never yield in the faceof coercion would seem to precludecompromise. In particular, it willbe difficult for Dean Wick to com¬promise in light of his much quot¬ed alleged “hell no” response whenasked about a student voice in ad¬ministrative decisions. Yet ob¬viously, some kind of compromisewill have to emerge if the Univer¬sity is to avoid Berkeley-type disin¬tegration which would have disas¬trous e'fects on its S1P0 millionfund raising campaign. While it isdifficult to predict precisely howthe issue will be resolved, if stu¬dents are able to intensify their de¬monstrations it would appear un¬likely that the confrontation willend without some student voice inpolicy decisions and more unlikelystill that such a move could comeabout without some degree of hu¬miliation among administrative of¬ficials.You won't have to put yourmoving or storage problemoff until tomorrow if youcall us today.PETERSON MOVINGAND STORAGE CO.12655 S. Doty Avo.646-4411TOYOTA1 yr. free maintenance1900 C.C. Sports Car Action.Auto. Trans. Avail.*1714 90 H P.100 M.P.H.SALES - SERVICE - PARTS247-1400 - 3967 S. ArcherBUY NOW.SAVE NOW.PAY LATER.Built-To-LastCHECKER ^Sedans * Station WagonsLimousinesCHECKER TOWNE SOUTH INC.3967 SOUTH ARCHER AVENUE247-1400 Sales «. Service4 • CHICAGO MAROON • May 17, 1966GADFLYSelective Service and educational freedomThe issue which has been raised by the students in asking that ranks should be with¬held is one which is involved in a tangle with other issues. Among these are the issues ofthe rightness of student deferment altogether, the rightness of the war in Vietnam, andwho is the “boss” among students, faculty and administration. Recognizing that these is¬sues are involved (the last one, inmy opinion, not the most seemlyfor a great university such as theUniversity of Chicago), I would liketo deal principally with one:Should the University of Chicagocompute rank in class and submitsuch information to draft boardseven if the student gives his con¬sent? I think that it should not.It is worth recalling that thevery act by Congress which creat¬ed student deferments was in¬formed by the sense of the value ofthe educational enterprise to thenational welfare. When the Selec¬tive Service Administration co-optsthe educational enterprise in help¬ing it to make its particular deci¬sions on individual registrants itinjures that which it is trying toprotect.There is a growing general senti¬ment among educators that exces¬sive significance being given togrades cheapens and degrades thevalues of a liberal education. Thecurrent actions by the SelectiveService Administration have onlyserved to exacerbate the emphasison grades. As someone has put it,if the student cannot understand apoem bv Keats, the chance of hisbeing drafted is increased. Wemay exnect a growing trend to¬ward shopping for easy courses,and a flocking to teachers who arereputed to be easy graders. Somehave thought that, with the reor¬ganization of the College, some¬thing ought to be done wherebygrades become less important; butthis will be blocked bv the necessi¬ty of providing detailed grade in¬formation to draft boards. Themorally agonized student will beless motivated to do well on exam¬inations knowing that his goodgrade will depress someone else’sgrade. Students who might want todisagree with a professor’s inter¬pretation of what Socrates mighthave meant will refrain from doingso because of fear of alienatingthat professor. Professors, who areprofoundly aware of the limitedreliability and validity of grades,will consider not only the merits ofthe student but his draft status inmaking a decision between a C-plus and a B-minus. Their educa¬tional decisions will be clouded bythe moral agony that properly be¬longs to the draft boards.Conscientious members of draftboards—and we can presume thatmost of them are—have the burdenof making decisions in the face ofintrinsically unresolvable dilem¬mas. Being a member of a draftboard is very much like being acaptain of a life-boat that has toomany people in it. Somebody hasto go, and there are hardly any sat¬isfactory criteria available to hu¬man beings to make decisions likethis. As a result, the SelectiveService Administration desires,hungers, even lusts for criteriawhich appear to them as “objec¬tive.” At the moment they havebeen reaching for grades and rankin class as presumably “objective”criteria. Even if grading werereally reliable and valid for educa¬tional aims—the limits of whichevery teacher is painfully aware—it is certainly quite irrelevant towhether a student should or shouldnot be a member of the ArmedForces! And it is our duty to makethis clear in every way that we can to those who determine Selec¬tive Service policy. It is our dutyas teachers to teach them as well.Many teachers have sat in oncommittees in which applicationsto graduate and undergraduateprograms have been reviewed. Allof us are fully aware of the qualifi¬cations that we bring to bear in re¬viewing grade information of anykind. We, as experts, know that theevaluation of this kind of informa¬tion has to be done very carefully.We certainly cannot expect mem¬bers of draft boards to evaluatethese records with even remotelysimilar qualification. When weevaluate a grade record it is oftenwith some knowledge of the schoolfrom which the applicant comes.But we cannot expect a draftboard member to know what thelevel of academic expectation is ofa school from which he will be re¬ceiving rank in class information.In recent days the terms “Coer¬cion” and “freedom” have beenrather freely used. It is indeed truethat coercion spawns coercion. Andit is indeed true that free discus¬sion cannot take place in an at¬mosphere of coercion. The Univer¬sity should recognize that it is pre¬cisely the coercive presence of theSelective Service Administration inthe University which should bebarred. Unless we can effectivelyremove the coercive presence ofthe Selective Service System fromour relations with our students, allof the liberal values which we areinterested in defending will be un¬dermined in the University itself.(Indeed, if I may depart for amoment to consider the war inVietnam which has led to all ofthis, it is precisely our use of coer¬cion in contrast with negotiationwhich Tnany people in the UnitedStates have perceived as the majorissue in Vietnam. And what we arefeeling in the colleges and univer¬sities is exactly the result of ourcoercive role in international af¬fairs.)IF WE GIVE DETAILED gradeinformation ti the Selective Serv¬ice Board at the request of the stu¬dent, we are hardly allowing “free¬dom” to the student in any usualsense. We are, rather, relinquish¬ing him to the coercion which is anintrinsic feature of Selective Serv¬ice. A student who does not grantthis permission is immediatelysubject to being regarded as a“draft delinquent,” uncooperativewith his draft board. On the otherhand, if we refuse to give this in¬formation to the Selective ServiceBoards, at the very least the onusof “draft delinquency” is not uponthe student. And our argument,that it interferes with the educa¬tional enterprise, is far more tell¬ing than any argument to be madeby an individual student.One argument which has beenmade is that since whatever sub¬version of the educational enter¬prise that may be done is alreadydone when transcripts are requiredby draft boards, there is little ad¬ditional damage to be done by giv¬ing rank in class. The argument ismade that we cannot legally with¬hold transcripts. I think that weought to do all that we can to per¬suade the authorities not to ask fortranscripts. But under any circum¬stances, the legal question of com¬ puting rank in class for men forthe sake of the Selective ServiceAdministration is quite of anotherorder. (As one person has said, itwould make as much educationalsense to rank all left-handed stu¬dents.) The fact is that there is novalid educational reason for rank¬ing male students. To do so is onlyfor the purposes of the SelectiveService Administration. To do so isalso to exaggerate the student-to-student competitiveness, whichmany regard as injurious to learn¬ing.Grades have certain customaryand ordinary uses, as indeed, allprofessional records do. A psychi¬atrist’s records are, in some sense,the property of the patient; andyet, the opinion of all men of goodsense would be that they shouldnot be freely opened to the patient.The dean of students keeps manyrecords on individual students, andyet one would not claim that all ofthe student’s records must beopened on demand; or, that on thestudent’s request they should begiven to anyone that he requeststhat they be given. Thus, the argu¬ment that the grades are the stu¬dent’s property, to be used in anyway that he demands, cannot bedefended. (And there is a realquandary when hundreds of stu¬dents demand that their recordsshall not be used for the construc¬tion of a ranking of males for thebenefit of the Selective Service Ad¬ministration.) But the fact remainsthat this particular use of thegrade information is an extra-ordi¬nary use.THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONhas not yet arisen, but we shouldbe prepared for it. What if the Se¬lective Service Administrationshould ask for attendance records?We have a historical traditionagainst taking attendance. We be¬lieve that the student should be freeto take advantage of opportunities.But there is a growing abuse overthe nation of students registeringat colleges in order to maintain astudent deferment, and not goingto classes, and showing up at ex¬amination time. If this becomesreally widespread, the SelectiveService Administration might wellmove to ask also whether the stu¬dent has been going to class con¬scientiously. If we defer to the Se¬lective Service Administration ingiving rank in class, would we notalso find ourselves in an awkwardposition when another extra-ordi¬nary practice is ccued of us? Letus hope that this is purely hypo¬thetical.The Selective Service System aswe have it now is not exhaustive ofall possibilities. The use of a lot¬ tery combined with a nationalservice requirement is a viable al¬ternative which, at the very least,would remove the gross deficien¬cies of the present system.Let me conclude by saying thatthere is a great tradition in theU'nited States against governmentinterference in education. This tra¬dition is based on the recognitionof the value to society of reallyfree educational institutions. At themoment the colleges and universi¬ties of this country are beingdrawn into becoming agents of agovernment agency. Nor is thisjust an ordinary government agen¬cy. It is an agency which least ex-SIT-OUT: UC administration, until lastdemonstrator leaves ad building.FOLK DANCE: International house, 8pm.Wednesday, May 18LECTURE: “Relation of urban designto the social sciences,” ChristopherTunnard, Yale University, Breasted hall,10 am.CARILLON RECITAL: Daniel Robbins,University carillonneur, Rockefellerchapel, 5 pm.LECTURE: “Is God Dead?” John War-wich Montgomery, Trinity divinityschool, fifth floor Pierce Tower, 7:30pm. presses our democratic beliefs.The Selective Service System ishardly to be considered integral toour total democratic society. It isan undemocratic institution whichwe sadly tolerate for the sake ofthe larger good. Thus that whichso deeply expresses our democrat¬ic beliefs, the University, is beingdrawn in to serve directly one ofthe least democratic agencies inour political life, the SelectiveService Administration. It is mydeep conviction that we should re¬sist this with all of the resources atour disposal.Meyer, professor of chemistry, 5640 El¬lis, room L—8, 8 pm.COFFEE HOUR: Blackstone hall, 5748Blackstone, 9 to 11 pm.Thursday, May 19LECTURE: “The genetic code.” M.Nirenberg, National Institute of Health,Abbott 101, 11:30 am.LECTURE: “Calendar, cannon, andclock and the cultural contact betweenEurope and China,” Ling Wang, profes¬sor, Cornell University, Soc Sci 122, 4pm.SEMINAR: "Alveolar hypoventilationand cor pulmonale,” with Dr. AlfredFishman. Columbia University. BobsRoberts B604, 5 pm.PILOT 18-25. Will exchange cards, tapes, AGE 18records. Booklet of entries, names,addresses and photos $1.00.Universal Students Activities333 No. Michigan Ave.Chicago, III. 60601 . r vil.iv uaimctimu: Hiuei nouse.LECTURE: Quantum fluids, Lothar tion 7:30, general dancing 9 pm.PATRONIZE OUR ADVERTISERSDR. AARON ZIMBLER, OptometristIN THENEW HYDE PARK SHOPPING CENTER1510 E. 55th St.DO 3-7644 DO 3-6866EYE EXAMINATIONSPRESCRIPTIONS FlllED CONTACT LENSESNEWEST STYLING IN FRAMESStudent and Faculty DiscountKEYPUNCHING• 500 CARDS OR MORE •• FAST TURN AROUND •FOR ESTIMATE CALLSHEILA BLIXT, 332-4708R. SKIRMONT & ASSOCIATES, INC.33 NORTH LaSALLE STREETCHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602COMPUTER APPLICATION CONSULTANTSLehnhoff School of Music & DanceAnnounces Summer Course of 6-WeeksBeginning June 27 thru Aug. 5Music FundamentalsFor boy* & girls—5-7 yrs.Group study with Orft InstrumentsNote reading - rhythmEar TrainingEnsemble PlayingTwice a weekExcellent preparation forany kind of instrumental study. Private LessonsIn Piano - Flute - RecorderTrumpet - ViolinViola - Cello - ClarinetChamber Music ClassesFoil Classes & Private Lessons begin Sept. 26Special Classes in Modern Dance for College StudentsCREATIVE DANCE FOR CHILDRENFOR MORE INFORMATION CALL OR WRITEBU 8-4347 1438 E. 57th St.David BakanProfessor of PsychologyW. - WB&- *"->iWM • ' • -W* ’ • ’v*>>¥£::Calendar of eventsfe* - v.;. • •:WHMHM W8UHK&Tuesday, May 1May 17, 1966 • CHICAGO MAROON • BUnknown fate greets purposeful protestersby Slade Lander(Editor’s note: Slade Lander, asecond-year English major in theCollege. imrticipated in the sit-inboth as a demonstrator and as areporter. His story covers the firsttwenty-four hours of the sit-in. Allimpressions and opinions are com¬pletely his own and in no way re¬flect the position of the Maroon.)The protesters come intothe building seriously, not ex¬pecting a picnic. They mightbe arrested or suspended;their unknown fate gives them asense of purpose.They mill in the lobby, closelypacked together with news report¬ers immersed within them. Whenthe speeches start there are per¬haps three hundred people in thelobby, overflowing into the regis¬trar’s office.Speeches to the worldJeff Blum is the first speaker, heis followed by another, and thenSteve Kindred. Kindred haranguesto the point of absurdity. Theystand on the travel agency’s coun¬ter and veil through a bull-horn.But the speeches are neither toconvert nor to justify the sit-in forthat has been done through thecountless meetings that have p.c-ceeded the demonstration. Ratherthey are speaking to the newsmenam' through them, to the outsideworld. To those who are sitting-inthe speeches are the starting point; they unify the people into abody, they set out the body’scourse of action.There is only one heckler. “De¬struction of property,” he rants.But ha is found humorous, notsubversive.AFTER THE SPEECHES thereis the problem of logistics. A pick¬et line is set up in the rain, but itis small and those who picket aremerely people who do not have thetime to sit-in. Inside the demon¬strators gradually move through¬out the building, creeping almostlike children exploring a strangenew house. Gradually they extendto the sixth floor, filling the hall¬ways. Beadle’s elevator on thesixth floor is a strategic prize to becaptured. The leaders debate theirmoves in the terms of logistics. Fi¬nally a vangard of ten students en¬ter the office and sit around thelocked door to the elevator. Laterthey are asked to leave, and do.keeping in the cooperative policyof the early hours of the sit-in.The demonstrators do not inter¬fere with the employees working inthe building. The original plan notto let anyone enter the offices fromoutside is not adhered to; the dem¬onstrators let the personnel comeand go through the crowd as bestt' cv can. One secretary commentsthat the demonstrators were“very co-operative.” Most person¬nel will make no statement. Two inthe registrar’s office play gin rum-LENSIMEby MURINEEXCLUSIVE!Free removable carryingcase! Provides hygienic,convenient carefor yourlenses.This one solutiondoes all three!1. WETS. Lensine’s special propertiesassure a smoother, non-irritating lenssurface when inserting your ‘^contacts."just a drop will do it.2. CLEANS. When used for cleaning,Lensine’s unique formula helps retardbuildup of contaminants and foreigndeposits on lenses.3. SOAKS. Lensine is self-sterilizing andantiseptic. Ideal for wet storage or “soak¬ing" of lenses. Reduces harmful bacteriacontamination.CARRYING CASE. Exclusive removablecarrying case free with every bottle ofLensine. The scientific—and convenlint—way to protect your contacts.LENSINE fromThe Murine Company, Inc....eye care specialist for 70 years my, another sings with the dem¬onstrators.Wick departsAt four thirty Dean Wick leavesthe building. His departure is an¬nounced on the loudspeakers andthe demonstrators cheer, as thesymbol of their opposition has leftthe building. It is their’s. The an¬nouncement is made that the ad¬ministration personnel have beentrld not to report for work the nextday unless called.AT FIRST they were a crowd,then a group of demonstratorsseeking a goal, and now. with thatgoal obtained, they become a com¬munity, a community celebrating.They are victorious; there is anelation in victory and a unifyingelement. The common banjos andguitars are played; there are cardand chess games; some attempt tostudy. There is no longer the des¬perate air of protest for the threatsof arrest and suspension are re¬moved; rather there is the air oftriumph.The demonstrators have cap¬tured a new toy and are intriguedwith it. The students wanderthrough the building, searching allthe crannies that they can. In thewasteland of desks on the fourthfloor they use the phones and playcards on the desks. The feeling ofunity that once existed is swallow¬ed up by the fascination.But again a community develops,centering around the problems cfliving together in the building:food is sold on the third floor, thefourth floor becomes a study hall,students begin to sweep up the de¬bris of the demonstration.Gradually, almost stealthfully,students disburse through thebuilding. Some leave giving thebuilding an air of desertion. Thosewho remain are committed to staythe night and to solve the problemsthat they face. In opposition tothese problems a new sense of uni¬ty forms.Parliamentary meetingOn the fourth floor, at about 7pm, a group of about thirty peoplebegin discussing their future ac¬tion. Instinctively they follow par¬liamentary procedure, letting eachspeak, and all speaking about theproblem of what their future actionwill be. This is not the executivecommittee; they have no power tomake decisions for the group. Butstill they move towards a commongoal of action, and as long as theymove towards this goal they areunified; they listen and speak inturn.On the fifth floor, in a stifling corridor, the executive committeemeets. They have come to therealization that they cannot remainindefinitely, and that perhaps theywill not be able to force the Uni¬versity to change its policy. Butstill they talk on, trying to find acourse of action.THE LOBBY is now deserted,save for some people talking. Astudent sweeps the floor. A lonecounter-picket paces. There is theair of a state of seige.452 Sleep-inDuring the night 452 demonstra¬tors settle down to the tedium ofwaiting for the morning. Some tryto study, some to sleep, but thereis too much excitement for either.Generally they sit, talk, playcards, pass the time.In the morning, just before seveno’clock, students formally set upbarriers against the doors. It is al¬most as though the building wasabout to be attacked; the leadersact almost to the point of hysteria.The lobby fills quickly and com-pietely, the students sitting fromdoor to door, from the Bursar’s of¬fice into the Registrar’s. The planshave been conceived, now theymust be carried out.THE FIRST EMPLOYEES try toenter at seven. One violentlywrenches at the door, but they areall turned away. A problem pre¬sents itself, who to let enter, whoto deny. It has been decided beforeonly to allow switchboard opera¬tors to enter, but now there arepress, supporters, and repairmen.The leaders maintain no oneshould be admitted for securityreasons, but the demonstrators dis¬agree. “Vote, vote,” they chant. Avote is held elaborately contrivedso that even those who are not pres¬ent in the lobby can be included.And it is decided to admit thepress and some repairmen. This isa question which recurs throughoutthe morning.Taking Beadle’s elevator is stilla strategic problem. It is taken; anemployee walks through a door onthe fifth floor and while it is opendemonstrators pour into the eleva¬tor and stairwell. Kindred comesthrough the front doors and yells,“The elevator is ours! The stair¬well is ours! The building is ours!”There are cheers; it is Kindred’sbirthday and the demonstratorssing “Happy Birthday,” to him.There are seven workmen out¬side who need to be admitted to dosome repairs. There is a crisis ofpolicy and the crowd reaches to¬wards hysteria as they try to de¬cide their action. Finally it is votedWhy not have your roommate tape your lecture for you?Then you can listen to the soothing drone of a loved mentorwhile you lie in comfort under your electric blanket. Rent atape recorder fromTOAD HALL1444 E. 57th St. BU 8-4500PHOTOGRAPHYNow is the best time for talcing pictures ofthe campus in color or black and white.Get advice on how and where to take the bestshots on the University of Chicago Campus.The University of Chicago Bookstore5802 Ellis Ave.The COURT HOUSE in Harper Courtoffers fo students• Weisswurste with Potato Salad• A Stein of Imported Pschorr Munich Bearwith this ad, all for $1.50* (regular 1.80)* students under 2T figure less for soft drinksOood any evening In May, 0:30 PM « 1 AM, Closed only on Monday* to admit them. There is a minuteof silence; calm is restored.SINGING, TALKING, excitementfollows. All the administration em¬ployees are turned away. Nowthere is a sense of danger, of com¬mon purpose, of discomfort. Thedemonstrators have weathered anuncomfortable night. Few haveslept, all have been strained. Theyare united by this common hard¬ship and common goal. They arehardened and serious. It is not asocial event any more, it is a mi¬nor revolution.There is some tension with thepress. One television reporterstands in the middle of the crowd,talking to the future television au¬dience. He states that the sit-in isagainst the war in Vietnam and isshouted down by the students. Hestarts again and makes the samemis-statement. Students move be¬tween him and the camera. For amoment there is a confrontationbetween the reporter: he backsdown and reports the official posi¬tion of only protesting Universityranking, not the war.Decision to RemainAt 9:30 am a meeting begins toplan the future action of the group.Jackie Goldberg chairs it, manipu¬lating the parliamentary proce¬dure with the genius of an existen¬tial legislator. At first the meetingmoves forward toward. But a ru¬mor is heard that President Beadleis meeting with other adminis¬trators important people in theCenter for Continuing Education: itis assumed it is in response to thedemonstration. The protestors be¬gin to consider their actions in anew light. The rumor is refuted butit has done its damage. The feelingof community is destroyed and thequestion of whether to continue thedemonstration beyond five that aft¬ernoon becomes bogged in a quag¬mire of parliamentary procedure.A half hour passes before it isforced to a vote. The motion tostay beyond five passes, and thereare cheers. There are other minormotions, but the meeting has gonethrough its crisis; it soon breaksup.The demonstrators are tired,hungry, dirty. They want to rest,not to keep watch upon the doors.The question of how to hold thebuilding is sent to the tactics com¬mittee, but it never has time toformulate plans. Soon after themeeting has broken up men try toforce their way into the building.There is physical violence at thedoors, the demonstrators havingthe doors slammed against them.Quickly a general meeting iscalled, and the question of whetherto try to seal off the building or toleave it open. Almost out of fatiguethey hastily vote to open the doors:they are too tired to maintain theirvigil, and, now that the building’snormal activity has been disrupt¬ed, it seems pointless. The admin¬istration building has been ren¬dered inoperable; they have ac¬complished their goal.Ml 3-31135424 S. Kimbarkwe sell the best,and fix the rest^ foreign car hospitalTAhSAM-WJCMINESI - AMERICANRESTAURANTCANTOHm ANDDISHESmm dawM AM H 9*5 fMORDERS TO TAKE OUTtill >Mt flitf * MU 4-1062A • CHICAGO MAROON • May 17, 1966*»»*• **« ■> "■*»*•**>' cv-.**' x>< n Complete text of suggestionsReferendum text" $G issues proposal on student voice8(1) As a matter of standing policy, the University of Chicago ought torelease to the Selective Service System information about whetheran individual student is registered and in good standing:(Check one)automatically, whenever such information is requested by the Se¬lective Service System.automatically, unless by a certain date the student has requestedin writing that such information not be released,only upon receipt of a written request from the student to releasesuch information.under no circumstances, regarless of the wishes of the individualstudent.(2) As a matter of standing policy, the University of Chicago ought torelease to the Selective Service System information contained onthe official transcript containing grades of individual students:(Check one)automatically, whenever such information is requested by the Se¬lective Service System.automatically, unless by a certain date the student has requestedin writing that such information not be released,only upon receipt of a written request from the student to releasesuch information.under no circumstances, regardless of the wishes of the individualstudent.(3) As a matter of standing policy, the University of Chicago ought torelease to the Selective Service System information about theclass rank of individual students:(Check one)automatically, whenever such information is requested by the Se¬lective Service System.automatically, unless by a certain date the student has requestedin writing that such information not be released.only upon receipt of a written request from the student to releasesuch information.under no circumstances, regardless of the wishes of the individualstudent.(4) As a matter of standing policy, the University of Chicago oughtto release to the Selective Service System information about theMALE class rank of individual students:(Check one)automatically, whenever such information is requested by the Se¬lective Service System.automatically, unless by a certain date the student has requestedin writing that such information not be released.only upon receipt of a written request from the student to releasesuch information.under no circumstances, regardless of the wishes of the individualstudent.Answer the following questions notwithstanding your answers to theprevious questions.(5) The 1965-66 policy of the University on the above issues should bereconsidered for 1966-67 during the Fall Quarter 1966.Yes No(6) Shall the University comply with the request of individual stu¬dents to release male class ranks to the Selective Service Systemprior to the end of the Fall Quarter 1966?Yes x NoModern music dueOne world premiere and threeChicago premieres will highlight aconcert of contemporary musicwhich the Chicago Symphony Or¬chestra will present on Thursdayand Friday, May 26 and May 27 inMandel Hall, 8:30 pm.The orchestra will be conductedby Jean Martinon, its music direc¬tor. Ralph Shapey, assistant pro¬fessor of music at UC will be guestconductor in the world premiere ofhis Invocatiotv—Concerto for Violinand Orchestra. The soloist will beEsther Glazer, the well-known Chi¬cago violinist.In addition to Shapey’s Invoca¬tion, the program, which will bethe same both nights, will includethe Chicago premieres of Elegy forOrchestra by Kenneth Gaburo, pro¬fessor of music at the University ofIllinois; Variations, by Luigi Dal¬lapiccola, one of Italy’s foremostcomposers, and Three Pieces forOrchestra by Seymour Shifrin, whoteaches composition at the Univer¬sity of California at Berkeley.General admission to these con¬certs is $2.50 ($1 for students).Tickets are available only at theUniversity concert office, 5802south Woodlawn ave, or at theMandel Hall box office on theevenings of the concerts. Representatives of SG havemet informally with membersof the faculty and administra¬tion during the past week todiscuss ways of increasing studentinvolvement in the University’s de¬cision making process in generaland the decision on ranking inparticular.In regard to the decision onranking, the following proposalwas drawn up and submitted tomembers of the committee withthe request that it be considered atits next meeting:I. Since the educational issuesinvolved in ranking (e.g. undueemphasis on grades, faculty partic¬ipation in Selective Service, etc.)are less relevant to the decision toissue class ranks for this pastacademic year, than for the futureyears, and since there is a necessi¬ty for making some kind of deci¬sion before the end of spring quar¬ter 1966, a clear distinction mustbe drawn between University poli¬cy fo 1965-66 and that in the fu¬ture. Therefore:A. An SG referendum on Univer¬sity ranking policy for this yearshall be held on May 25.B. Between now and May 25 SGwill sponsor a series of discussionson University ranking policy.C. As soon as possible, the Com¬mittee of the Council shall issue astatement that in order to makethe results of the Student Govern¬ment referendum of May 25 ameaningful, informed and consid¬ered expression of student opinionso that its * ults may be givenserious consu.ration by the Coun¬cil, the University shall sponsorand shall cooperate with studentgroups in sponsoring a series ofdiscussions on the ranking questionbetween now and May 25.D. The question of Universityranking policy for 1966-67 shall bere-opened in the fall quarter 1966.Discussions shall be sponsored bythe Committee of the Council incooperation with student groupsand another SG referendum shallbe held on ranking before the endof the fall quarter.II. A. 1. The question of con¬ tinuation of present Universityranking policy shall be more clear¬ly distinguished from the questionof recommendations for nationaldraft policy by reaffirming and un¬derscoring the Councils standingdistinction between the two. A dateshall be set for fall 1966 (an-SOCIAL SCIENCES COLLEGIATE DIVISION1- Public Lecturex NORMAN JACOBSON0 Professor of Political Sciences,University of California, Berkeleyz POLITICSo and theCRISIS OP MODERNITYTuesday, May 17, 4:00, Breasted HallAdmission is without ticket or chargeHONDASEE ALL MODELS50 C.C. TO 444 C.C.SALES - SERVICE • FARTSa RICK UP A DELIVERYe EASY FINANCINGe LOW INSURANCE RATESMl 3-4500CHICAGO'S LARGEST &JUST AROUND THE CORNERSeo the MAROON classified for your esmpue sales representativeBOB NELSON MOTORS4136 S COTTAGE GROVEBOB NELSON MOTORSImport CentroComplete RopotnAnd ServicePer AH Popular ImportsMMvpf 1-45016052 So. Cottage Grove 10* SALELibrary Duplicate and Discard SaleAll Books10*Sale Begins Today, May 17Ends Saturday, May 21.The University'of Chicago Bookstore5802 Ellis Ave. dent-faculty committee) shall ar¬range or sponsor campus-wide dis¬cussions on the draft in coopera¬tion with student groups includingthe possibility of a national confer¬ence on draft to be held here.B. SG in accordance with theCouncil’s distinction between Unl-nounced now) at which time the ' voroity and nation#! draft policyCouncil shall take up the questionof a University position on nationaldraft policy and future Universitypolicy on ranking.2. To promote discussions or.draft policy for the Fall Quarter,the Council shall appoint a student-faculty committee to prepare anoutline of the issues involved inranking and national draft policies.The outline shall be the basisaround which the fall quarter stu¬dent-faculty discussions may becentered.3. The Council (or the above stu- and between policy for this aca¬demic year and that for the next,shall hold a referendum on thisyear’s ranking policy no later thanMay 25. It shall hold an additionalreferendum on all other questionsin the fall quarter 1966, prior to thetime the Council begins debate onthe issues. The fall referendumshall be based on the outline of thedraft issues prepared by the abovestudent-faculty committee.C. The results of the referendumshall weigh heavily in the Council’sdeliberations.Final examination schedule(Continued from page two)Social Sciences 274 Thur June 9 44 CL 14Social Sciences 277 Wed June $ 10:36-12:30 AO 27Sociology 203 Thur June 9 0-10 RO 2Spanish 101-2-3 Mon June 6 V. 30-4:30 AB 101Spanish 102-5-4 Mon June 6 1:30-4:30 E 207Spanish 203 Tut June 7 12:30-2:30 K 304Spanish 209 Fri June 10 10:30-12:30 w»Spanish 317 Fri June 10 1:30-3:30 S 206Statistics 200 Wed June 8 •1:30-3:30 E 203Swedish 103 41 Wed June 8 0-10 WB 103Swedish 203 Tue June 7 0-10 WB 203Zoology 203 Wed June 8 8-10 Z 14Fri June 10 8:30-10:30 1 14SWAP presentsOSCAR BROWN, JR.SUNDAY. MAY 22nd —MANDEL HALL 4:00Student Adm. 1.50MR. KICKS" BRINGS JOY IN ‘66Tickets: SWAPIDA Y3587NOYES HALLxXoOUR UNIVERSITY SHOPSummer suits and sportwearmade on our exclusive modelssuits oj Dacron9 polyester-and-cottonfoplin in tan, light olive or navy, $47.50 jin Dacron®-and-worsted tropicals, $70**“ODD jackets oj hand-woven cottonIndia Madras, $42.50} washable Vycron®polyester-and-cotton, $45 j lightweightOrion® acrylic-and-wool navy blazers, $55odd trousers oj tropicalDacron®-and-worsted, $22.50}Dacron®-and-cotton poplin, $ 13.50A nd Bermuda shorts, sport shirts, "Jams,” etc,♦Price slightly higher west of the Rockies.ISTASLISHI0161$Miens ^ Moys furnishings, ffats74 E. MADISON, NR. MICHIGAN AVE., CHICAGO, ILL. 60602NEW YORK • BOSTON • PITTSBURGH • LOS ANGELES • SAN FRANCJ8CO’<±jariisBer^jaor^joBrTtJBeriSjmr<i0tri.May 17, 1966 • CHICAGO MAROON • 1PersonalsToday is the last day to register to votefor the June primary. Register at yourprecinct polling place before 9 pm.Doc Films PRODUCTION UNIT is Anti-RANK and PRO-ANGER, Kenneth An¬ger that is. This Wednesday, May 18,Soc. Sci. 122, 7/9 pm. 75c. We are show¬ing Anger s INAUGARATION OF THEPLEASURE DOME. If you don’t likeour political opinions, you might likeour films. Come anyway.Give students their rights. Don’t be aSticky Wicket 1Rich—there will be fresh homemadecookies especially to attract you toBlackstone Coffee Hour, Wed. F.F.Male grad studs seek native Frenchperson to tutor conversational Fr. thisfummer, 3-4 hrs/wk 684-1386.International Festival Hyde ParkMethodist Church, Fri. & Sat, May 20-81, food and entertainment, $1 don. ad¬mits both nights. Oscar Brown Jr. Sat.Evening.Is Wick losing his faculties? Resignrow!Augustan Lutheran Church will be pre-renting Miss Eileen Hanson a specialarewell gift Sunday, May 22. We inviteall who have been a part of her minis¬try on Campus to join us at our 11:00service in Bond Ohapel to make the fare¬well a hearty one.Magyar Diaki Szovetseg? kerem tele-fonaljon Melinda Kovats keto nyolcsketoot nyols keto kilenc.If the cookies are gone, you can al¬ways knaw on wood panaling—IdaNoyes Coffee afternoons, 2-5 pm., colorTV.We need a Dean of Students who isn’t aWick in the mud.jCamelot Restaurant, 2160 E. 71st St.10% discount for students.Rejoice! Rejoice! Today marks the 100anniversary of the birth of Erik Satie!!!Writer’s Workshop — PL 2-8377A FAREWELL TO (warner) ARMS'(Wick)!Buy-sell books Student Coop. Open sum¬mer. Register now for summer babysit-ting. Reynolds Basement.On this 12th Anniversary of the Browndecision follow Martin Luther King’s^dvice. Register to vote!COME WHERE THE ACTION ISGive Illinois a strong new voice in theUS Senate. Help elect Charles H. Per-•y. Contact Dave Preston, Rm. 600, 100w. Monroe, Chicago, 346-3418. . , . Classified advertisementswmmmmz -v ^ wSomething New On CampusThis Wednesday, May 18th, at 8:00 Ball¬room dancing instruction at Internation¬al House. Everybody welcome (nocharge).RidesWant ride from Philadelphia to ChicagoJune 20th Harvey-752-9784.Drive ’65 Corvair to BERKELEY wk. ofJune 20th, Mr. Joseph Pr 9-6060, 9am-4pm. Will pay for gas.Ride wanted: - Chicago to N.Y.C. Shareexpenses, leave June 1-3 - 667-7086.Lost & FoundLOST on campus Mon. Grey leather at¬tache case with Botond Varga writtenon side. Reward. 684-3998.FOUND small purse outside classicsbldg. wk. of May 9th. Tnquine Classics13.LOST green cloth bookbag. in Harperlibrary: contains books, notes, cheeseon rye, and New Republic. Please(pretty please) return to T. C. Hanson;Call 643-2417.Summer SubletBeautiful air. cond. new furn. apt. 55th& Cornell, Free Parking Approx. Je. 10-Sept, 1 $90/mo. Call 324-9233.Share apt. 53/Kenwood-$36.25 mo. ownrm. June pd. 684-399B.3-3!a rms. married studs. furn.$113/mo./best offer over $85. No. 101.5125 S. Kenwood. 643-2403.5 rms. 6009 Woodlawn, 3rd fl., furn. 324-6940.Cool basement. 56th 1 blk. from Lake.Call 643-2516.2 males summer townhouse. TV, hi-fi.$41/mo. 5 blks from campus. 324-5751Eves.Sublet Je. 15-Spt. furn. 4'i rms. 2bdrms, $110-54th & IJniv. 363-5012. V,2 rms. for woman kitoh, bath, Frenchwindows, 55th & Cornell, mid-Je.-endSpt. 493-8999 bf, 9 pm.Not an apt, tent, or igloo but fully furn.7 rm. house. 2 males wanted, 6/1-10/1Mi 3-6000 Rm. 547.For Sale’65 Honda 160 $430. Dan Heit—1822Pierce, FA 4-9500.’58 TR-3 w./HT, exc. $485. ES’ 8-6713.Furniture, reas. priced. 924-6812 untilmidnight.Getting Married? Double bed for sale. 4poster, fine wood, $55. Many other furn.bargains. 752-0855.‘60 Rambler wagon, gd. cond. best offerover $400. 667-2735 or ext 4393.‘65 VW, grey leather interior $l450/bestoffer. 684-3890.Used Furniture & rugs for sale. 6 rms.Cheap. Piecemeal. 374-3308.Harmon-Kardon FM Stereo receiver 30-W. Garrard R.C. 88, both for $139. 521-0460 or 463-3585.Apts. & Houses WantedAttending U of C June 20-Aug 27. teach¬er and family of 3 needs furn. 3 bdrm.apt. or house. $150/mo. Write: GrahamPorter, 3637 Bennet, Dearborn. Mich.Furn. House w'/4-5 odrms., within 45min. UC. July 1, ‘66-July 31. ‘67 opti¬mum; Aug. 15. ‘66 to June 15, *67 poss.Contact O. Sexton, Dept. Zool., Wash-ington Univ., St. Louis, Mo.“Would like to sublease apartment orhouse near UC campus June 26through August 5. References available.Contact Richard Furr, 7985 PumpkinCourt, Cupertino, California.”Couple needs furn. apt. Je.-5 -Sept 15.Sublet or other arr. Contact Amstutz,980 W. King, apt, 2-9, Columbus. Ohio. For Rent5 rms, 2 bdrms, within walking dist. ofUC will rent to empl’yd couple. 288-6128 aft. 6.4 lg. rms., unfurn. 3rd fl. will decorate.69th & Crandon. 221-7257.Spacious 3 rm. apt. Completely furn.June 15-Oct. 1 also avail, for fall. 55thand Hyde Park Blvd. $95/mo. CallSteve or Irv 643-8260.Jobs OfferedSecretary wanted for project on campus—full or part time—flex, situation. CallDonna Rubin, MI 3-4335-Want fern. stud, to babysit 10 hrs/wk.during summer in xchange for rmw./private bath & kitch. priv. 2 boys,2V2 yrs & 4 yrs. Bu 8-4391 after 1 pm.SUMMER JOBS. Male, female (16-40).Foreign and Entire US 1966 listings,$2 00 postpaid Summer job guide, Dept.C. 142 High St., Portland. Maine.Internationally famous club seeks at¬tractive girls: show business, singing,and dancing potential. Exc. financialpossibility. DE 7-1330, ask for Mr. ArtHern after 7pm. wkdays.Roommates For SummerTwo grad men wish to share large apt.with third for June. $50 Own rm. ph.667-7086.Female to share furn. 4 rm. apt. nr.54th & Kenwood, $52.50/mo. & utils.Kate Sellars. 2316 Rickert Bu 8-6610.1-2 girls 57th & Drexel own rm.$42/mo. 324-0740,Fern, graduate needs 2 rm-mts. 6/15 •9/1 to share 7 rm. apt. own bdrm.Near campus. $50/mo. Jane Smith 363-6616.Suitable for 1-2. TV. records. FM. 1 blkfrom Co-op, IC & 53rd. Campus bus infront of house. 6/15-10/1. 667-2424 after6pm. . Z: /. . .. J|Poverty Stricken? Desire 3rd for sum¬mer. $32/mo. own rm. 6108 Ellis . 324.1163.WantedDesk & bed for summer quarter. Har¬vey. 752-9784.i mA meeting will be held onThursday, May 19, at 3 pmin the Office of CareeiCounseling and Placement.Reynolds Club, for Univer¬sity o f Chicago studentswho have appointments a*government interns in Wash¬ington this summer. For¬mer student interns and aragency official will be pres¬ent to answer any question*that interns may have. Plansfor summer seminars wills;also be discussed.Interns who are unable toattend this meeting shouldcall the Office of Caree;Counseling and Placement,ext. 3283.BLOUSE CLEARANCE TYPEWRITERSPre-inventory odds and ends blouse sale. Crisp, clean cotton blouses in printsand solid colors. Long sleeves, roll-up sleeves, and sleeveless. Bermuda collars,Italian collars, and jewel necklines. These are blouses of such classic designthey may be worn from year to year, they just never go out of style.Regular Price $3.95 SALE PRICE $2.37Regular Price $4.95 SALE PRICE $2.88Regular Price $5.95 SALE PRICE $3.50The University of Chicago Bookstore5802 ELLIS AVE. New & Used For Sale or Rental and we doall types of repairs.If repairs are delayed you may request a loanmachine if a complete overhaul is required.The University of Chicago Bookstore5802 Ellis AvenueTHE CHICAGOSYMPHONY ORCHESTRAJEAN MARTINON, Music DirectorTHURSDAY FRIDAYMAY 26,1966 MAY 27,1966UROGRAMELEGY FOR ORCHESTRA Kenneth GaburoINVOCATION-CONCERTO FOR VIOLIN AND ORCHESTRA Ralph ShapeyEsther Glazer, violinistConducted by the composerVARIATIONS Luigi DallapiccolaTHREE PIECES FOR ORCHESTRA Seymour ShifrinMANDLL HALL 8:3© p.m.Admission: $2.50, general (UC faculty, $2.00), and $1.00 studentTickets only at Concert Office, 5802 Woodlawn Avenue (60637); Ml 3-0800, extension 3886.8 • CHICAGO MAROON • May 17, 1966