Anti-rank sit-in ready to goby Gary ChristianaStudents opposing the ranking of male students for the draft will stage a sit-in demon¬ration in the administration building tomorrow to protest University’s plans to rank inccordance with the present Selective Service system.Only a proclamation by the administration reversing its policy on ranking can stop the6lt-in say spokesmen who representthe ad hoc group of students op- have been no official new develop- of such importance for their Im¬posed to University ranking which ments anc| since any changes or tures.is organizing the demonstration. ideas have been communicated to Another spokesman from the ex-, Last week, UC President George us oniy hy rumor, we regret to ecutive committee stated, “Those'Beadle issued a statement an- condude that the administration’s 300 students who unanimously ap-nouncing the University s intention attitude toward our particular con- proved a sit-in last Wednesday (atto formulate a male class rank. cern an(j toward discussions to re- a meeting held by the group) didBeadle declared that the question solve the present difference of opin- so with deepest regret. They haveas to whether or not a student s jon remains unchanged. Therefore been presented with a fait accom-personal rank would be submitted there seems to be little likelihood pli, a decision to rank that wasto his local draft board is to be de- 0f a change in our course, as much made administratively and secret-ided by the individual student. as we regret to say it.” ly. They decided to work throughAs of yesterday, feeling among One of the fundamental points of every possible channel for a peace-the anti-rank group was that the friction between the administration ful solution to the problem beforeadministration was not planning to and the anti-rank group, according sitting in; in every case they werecomply with its demand not to for- to the students, is the University’s rebuffed by the administration.”mulate a class rank. alleged reticence and neglect re- LAST FRIDAY evening, theSTEVE KINDRED, a spokesman garding the promulgation of its de- Committee of the Council of thethe group’s elected executive cision to rank, and on its failure to Faculty Senate invited several stu-jfomittee, declared, “Since there consult the students on a decision dents, including the elected spokes-,Volume 74—No. 53 The University of Chicago Tuesday, May 10, 1966Stress student protectionProfs voice draft concernoffered noby Slade LanderMembers of the Committee of the Council of the FacultySenate who could be contacted for comments on the Univer¬sity draft policy released last Thursday stressed the im¬portance of the University protecting those students whodesire to have their rank and - _____grades sent to local draft boardsin order to obtain deferments.They said, however, that the Uni¬versity is still open to suggestionsfrom faculty and students as tohow its policy may be improved.President George Beadle wouldnot comment, and Provost EdwardLevi could not be contacted forcomment.RON TABOR, a spokesman forthe anti-rank committee planningthe sit-in in the administrationbuilding tomorrow, said, “We con¬sider the statement that’s been re¬iterated by the University before.Until now the University has notbeen clear on its position; now it isl clearer.”Tabor added that the statement President Beadledid not represent any real change comment,in the University’s draft policy andDr. Howard Schomer, CTS president,announces resignation effective June 30The resignation of Dr. Howard Schomer, president of theChicago Theological Seminary, was announced late yesterdayafternoon at a meeting of the entire seminary community.Schomer’s resignation, which becomes effective on June 30,terminates the seven and a half __year period of his presidency in national peace, Dr. Schomer is awhich CTS has enlarged both its former president of the Interna-curriculum and facilities. tional Fellowship of ReconciliationDuring his administration, the and co-chairman of the Chicagofaculty and student body of CTS Committee for a Sane Nuclear Pol-have been increased, the basic jcy jje participated personally indivinity curriculum has been re- the civil rights crises in Albany,formed, and a number of new Georgia and Selma, Alabama, andstudy programs at the level of the he and his wife were members of aMaster’s degree have been imple- dergy deiegation that conferredmented. The seminary has also with religious leaders in SouthJoined in organizing the Chicago vietnam during the summer ofInstitute for Advanced Theological 1965 under tthe auSpices of the In-Studies in cooperation with three ternational Committee of Con-other seminaries in the Chicago scienC€ on Vietnam. As a church-area to provide for both profession- man he has taken part in threeal aM_acad_emic studies leading to assemblies of Wnrld Council ofthe doctoral degree. Churches and served as a Protes-In addition, the seminary has tant Observer at the Vatican Coun-been physically expanding during cil. He is currently a member ofthis time, with the building of new the board of the International Af-classroom, business, and residenti- fairs Commission of the Nationalal halls. Council of Churches, a trustee ofThroughout his preiidency, the Board of World Ministries ofSchomer has also continued to the United Church of Christ, anteach. Editor-at-Large of The Christian. Involved in the struggle for civil Century, and a Theological Advisorliberties, racial justice, end inter- (Continued on page seven) men of the anti-rank group, to din¬ner to discuss the ranking ques¬tion.A spokesman for the anti-rankgroup said the meeting was notfruitful. “The administration isscared. Students have been tryingto talk with them for six weeks,”he said. “Suddenly when we threat¬en to sit-in, an invitation appearsfor dinner at the center for con¬tinuing education.“They will try and buy us off bygiving the impression of consulta¬tion with students. All this cannotbury the fact that the decision hasalready been made behind closeddoors.”Members of the Committee ofthe Council of the Faculty Senatewho could be reached for commentagreed that the University’s pres¬ent policy was at least open to de¬bate.Professor of business Harry Rob¬erts called the accusation by theanti-rank group that the Universitymet with students only under pres¬sure a “gross oversimplification.”“Every member of the council ofthe Faculty Senate will meet withany and all students, and the Pres¬ident and Provost too have beenopen to consultation,” he said. PROFESSOR of medicine andphysiology Dr. Clifford Gurneystated that “the pressure from thesit-in has not influenced any com¬munication between students andthe administration.”Professor of physics Roger Hil¬debrand thought the sit-in might“have the effect of stopping debateand preventing change.” He saidhe “wouldn’t want a university toestablish policy under pressurefrom coercive pressure groups.”The 50-member Council of theFaculty Senate, which is elected bythe Senate and elects, in turn, the7 regular members of the Commit¬tee of the Council, met late yester¬day afternoon, reportedly on theranking issue.Under regular policy, the Councilwill make no public statement ofany decisions reached, reportinginstead only privately to the presi¬dent.Over the weekend, members ofStudent Government, working asindividuals, met with the adminis¬tration in an attempt to work out acompromise.They gave up after realizing thatcompromise on the essential ques¬tion cf ranking was impossible.the plans for a sit-in would not bealtered.Assistant professor of sociologyRichard Flacks commented, “Thepolicy statement is not what wehad hoped the University’s policyto be—to refuse to send in ranks.“The reason for concern,”Flacks said, “is because the Uni¬versity is not treating all studentsequally. Many students who refuseto send in rank and take the testwill be jeopardized while protect¬ing those who want a deferment.”CONTRADICTING this state¬ment, professor of business HarryRoberts, a member of the Council,stated that if a student were con¬cerned with not complying with thepresent Selective Service policy formoral reasons, the practical issueswould be secondary.The University must considerthose who do wish to have theirgrades and rank sent to their localdraft boards, he said.Flacks and assistant professor ofhistory William McGrath bothpointed out that a student who didwant a deferment could obtain oneby taking the draft deferment testand individually sending his gradesto his draft board. They both doubtthat an absence of rank would af¬fect this deferment.Both Flacks and McGrath point-(Continued on page five) Booth statementForce is not the answerAs faculty and students in a university that is dedicatedto free inquiry, we are all committed to making decisionsthrough discussion and persuasion, not through force. It isnot clear whether the unsigned “summary statement” issuedby those who are calling for thesit-in is a threat for the use offorce of simply a call to use thetechniques of peaceful persuasion-techniques which we would allagree include legal demonstrationand protest. In many of the com¬munications given orally to mem¬bers of the administration, wehave heard talk of an “ultimatum”delivered because of a “mandate”.The “summary statement” saysthat these ultimata were deliveredbecause those at the protest meet¬ing on Wednesday, May 4, felt“that all channels had not been ex¬hausted,” and “voted to try oncemore to come to a rational solu¬tion.” But regardless of the intentto try for a “rational solution,” theeffect has of course been to makereasonable discussion more diffi¬cult.As a member of the administra¬tion—and also as a former studentand a faculty member who has fre¬quently issued protests to adminis¬trations—I feel that I must makeclear what the issuance of an ulti¬matum does to my own passion forreasonable discussion: it weakensit, and it thus makes me a lessworthy member of this community.The very hint of a threat of physi¬cal force makes it hard for me, ifnot impossible, to discuss freely, solong as the threat is there. Themark of a free discussion is thatall participants feel bound by thediscussion, wherever it leads, and Dean Boothare thus free to concede to goodpoints made by the opposition. ButI cannot concede anything to sorne-^one threatening me without imply-iing that the threat, not the soundargument, coerced my concession.(A good example is perhaps theway in which the “summary state¬ment” interprets the meeting with*(Continued on page eight)Late bulletinUC policy on draft rankThe UC Council of the Academic Senate reaffirms its action a*id the statement of thePresident of the University on furnishing academic information to draft boards at the in¬stigation of students seeking deferment from military service.We are now restating our position to clarify the issues for those who have not closelyfollowed the deliberations. It seemsprudent to do so in the light of a Draft Boards only if the student the clarifying information wouldthreat delivered to the Committee requests or gives the University handicap our students who wish to, permission to do so.” It is clear exercise their right to seek defer-of the Council at a rtce => that “other academic information” ment. We could locate no principlewith a group of students. Some stu- includes class standing among on which to accept use of generaldents who were present made the males based on the performances class standings and at the samedemand that the University change of all males in the class—a type of time reject use of male classits policy or suffer a disruptive information now relevant under standings.demonstration. National Selective Service policy. Tn the petition appearing in thaThe University’s position is its Specifically, the protesting stu- Maroon of May 3rd, it was assert-traditional one, recently expressed dents demand that class standing that “ie lorIJiallon °t a classin the Council’s resolution of April among males not be disclosed, rank among males constitutes a12th: “Students should retain the even if the student seeking defer- significant institutional step. . .right to withhold or divulge their ment requests the University to To set the record straiglit we notegrades and other academic infor- send that information to his Draft l"at be*°re Autumn, 19o3, malemation for Selective Service pur- Board. It is our view that an indi- c^ass standings in the College wereposes as they see fit, and the Uni- cation of relative standing must manually computed. Last yearversity should furnish grades and accompany grades if the grades academic information was collect-other academic information to are to be meaningful. To withhold (Continued on page two)in iiiiii iiiiiiMIMIIliiilPIl* iiiwmii niumi—■'< ■ . :•Letters to the editor: - ‘ ; s_Draft-rank complianceviolates University's roleTO THE EDITOR:There is a confrontation betweena large group of students and theadministration of the University ofChicago. These students oppose theformation of a class rank of malestudents.The University is faced with adecision. It can either comply withthe request of the Selective ServiceSystem or refuse to do so. The im¬plications of this decision will be ofsignificance to the entire Univer¬sity community.To comply with the request for arank would violate the separationthat has traditionally existed be¬tween the University and the state.It is only by virtue of this separa¬tion that the University has existedas a place where men can expresstheir ideas without fear.Moreover, to comply with such ademand would imply that the Uni¬versity community is uniformly inaccord with the present militarysituation. It would expose mem¬bers of the community to pressureswhich would effectively stifle polit¬ical inquiry and it would implyblanket approval of the war inVietnam.American involvement in Viet¬nam is in itself so questionablethat tacit approval by the Univer¬sity is indefensible. Unless the Uni¬versity is willing to jeopardize freeexpression, and sanction the esca¬ lation of the war, it cannot complywith the request to form a rank.GARY BENENSONJAY KNOXBILL WARE"Inequities” of grades tobe amplified by rankingTO THE EDITOR:The inequities and inaccuraciesof the grading system are usuallyaccepted as necessary evils, but ifthey are about to be amplified itwill be well for us to have them inmind. Grades fail to distinguishbetween performance and ability,and they tend to show far moreabout distribution within a groupthan about either individual per¬formance or ability, further, asgrades function more and more ascriteria for student careers, thegrading system reflects and causesserious deterioration in the stu¬dent-teacher relationship.Class ranking augments the inac¬curacies of the grading system intwo ways: it eliminates personalstatements from teachers thatserve as correctives to grades, andit fails to take account of uneven¬ness of performance on the part ofthe student. Class ranking intensi¬fies the deterioration of the aca¬demic atmosphere in turning thegrading system into a status sys¬tem.The Selective Service systemproposes to use class ranking asone criterion for the identificationof those students who will be enti¬tled to an exemption from the mili¬ tary. There is no assurance that itwill be a reliable criterion. But inany case, the assumption that bet¬ter students should be exemptedbecause they can better serve theircountry as fully educated men canbe questioned from at least twopoints of view. First, there is theimplication of eugenics—selectionagainst the less intelligent, againstthe poor, and, indirectly, againstthe disadvantaged ethnic groups.Second, there is a suggestion of anew concept of war—small-scalewar, of which the inconvenienceand expense in human resources isPc'icy set on draft rank(Continued from pago one)ed and stored on tape aDd varioustabulations were made, includingrank by sex. Moreover, male classstandings were furnished duringthe Korean war.The University’s position in dis¬closing information about classstanding does not imply agreementthat the present Selective Servicepolicy is the best that can be de¬vised. In complying with a student-initiated request, the Universitydoes no more than permit eachstudent to exercise his right toseek deferment. To refuse such arequest is to deny him that rightand to violate the University’s his¬toric policy that the student shouldcontrol outside use of his records.Members of the faculty holdhighly diverse views about the wis¬dom of the present system of stu¬dent deferment. For example,some prefer elimination of all stu¬dent deferments; some prefer de¬ferment of students by lotteryalone: some prefer universal mili¬tary training some prefer defer¬ment by aptitude test alone, andsome see the present system, de¬spite its drawbacks, as the least ob¬jectionable. It is unlikely that anyof these positions commands aclear majority among the faculty.But we are agreed that any formof draft necessarily disturbs theeducational process, and that asearch should continue for that pol¬icy, consistent with other nationalobjectives, which will minimize thedisturbance.We are also agreed that the Uni¬versity should actively examine al¬ternatives. If a consensus emerges,UC should join with other universi¬ties in seeking its adoption. In ac¬cordance with this view, the Com¬mittee of the Council passed unani¬mously the following resolution atits meeting of April 19th: “ThePresident is asked to seek the ap¬proval of the Association of Ameri¬can Universities at its next meet¬ing to urge the American Councilon Education to institute a study todetermine if present guidelinesfor student deferment can beimproved.” President Beadle re¬ported to the Committee of theCouncil on May 3rd that he hadcarried out the wishes of the Com¬mittee at the April meeting of thePresidents of the Association ofAmerican Universities. On May 6thPresident Beadle stated: “TheUniversity’s view is that those who seek to change national policy onSelective Service should be encour¬aged to examine, discuss and per¬suade; and the University will en¬deavor through discussion to con¬tinue to seek ways to improve Se¬lective Service policy. To this endthe Committee of the Council is ar¬ranging a series of meetings withstudents and faculty.”Debate and discussion on studentdeferements have already been ex¬tensive. The issues have been con¬sidered at length at several meet¬ings of the Committee of the Coun¬cil and the Council. We are awareof numerous informal discussionsbetween students and members ofthe faculty and between studentsand the administration. Manymembers of the faculty and the ad¬ministration have immersed them¬selves deeply in the question. Theofficial statements of policy—thatthe individual student may choosewhether to have his record ofacademic performance divulgedand that better alternatives to thepresent Selective Service systembe sought—were reached afterthorough deliberation within thethe orderly processes of the Uni¬versity’s governing bodies. And,as noted, President Beadle has an¬nounced that further study of thestudent deferment problem isbeing undertaken by the Univer¬sity.The program just outlined is tobe sharply distinguished from thetactics of obstruction. It is an uglyirrationality to use such tactics ina university community where ra¬tionality is the dominant value.This is the basis for the Universi¬ty’s explicit policy against anyconduct intended to coerce andforeclose discussion on significantissues. The University cannot per¬mit itself to be exploited as a hos¬tage in a battle for public opinion.The question of Selective Servicepolicy is complex and difficult. Itis unbecoming to assume thatthere is only one answer for menof good will. The commitment ofthe University is to the free, in¬quiring, disciplined and uncoercedmind. Those who disagree with es¬tablished policies should expressthat disagreement in wasys consis¬tent with this commitment. Forseventy-five years the Universityhas maintained an enviable recordof independence from pressure andcoercion from whatever quarter. Itmust continue to do so. held to a minimum, as a perma¬nent background to the life of ourcountry. But “war is hell,’’ and tomake it more acceptable is to takea step toward the creation of apermanent war culture.President Beadle has announcedthat the University will relay tothe draft boards information aboutgrades and class ranking, but onlyin response to the student’s re¬quest. This is to protect each stu¬dent’s right to withhold or divulgethe information, as he chooses. Butthis policy, while it protects a for¬mal freedom, imposes an effectiverestraint. For a student is likely tohesitate to withhold if he expectshis fellows to divulge. In fact, thepolicy protects the rights of the di-vulger, but not of the withholder,and it is therefore in direct conflictwith the intention to remain neu¬tral.Refusal by the University to co¬operate with Selective Servicemight be read by the Governmentas a sign of hostility to its foreignpolicy, even though refusal wouldcommit us only to the principle ofnon-involvement. Conversely, wemust regard cooperation as a signof assent in that policy. It is neces¬sary, therefore, to reject anysuggestion that our active involve¬ment in the selection of soldierscan be undertaken in a spirit ofnon-commitment with regard eith¬er to the positions of individualstudents or to the current war.It is by no means clear that theUniversity should constitute itselfan instrument of the national poli¬cy in this way. To do so wouldsurely be to poison the atmosphereon the campus. But the graverconsequence would be to playagainst the national Intorost, whichrequires an independent intellec¬tual establishment.LEO TREITLERASSISTANT PROFESSOROF MUSIC the doorstep of Germany in WorldWar U. I fervently home that thesubmission and indifference ofmass civilizations is not a generaltrend in modern civilization.The students of this campus areplanning (or staged, depending onthe time of publication) a demon¬stration to specifically protest theranking of students by the draftboard. In making this minimal,simplified demand they have hopedfor results instead of panegyrics,action instead of evasion, decisioninstead of declaration.However, clearly underlying thesit-in, if it is held, is a protestagainst the war in Vietnam. Per¬haps a lottery, or a professionalarmy, or service in other govern¬ment areas, or universal compul¬sory service is an answer tothe draft. However, the only an¬swer which people who have fol¬lowed the history of the Vietnamwar can give to selective serviceis, “No, I cannot serve in this war,however fair or unfair the draftboard is.”Those who serve in the armedforces as well as the rest of thepeople in this country bear respon¬sibility for our country’s actions.To shun this responsibility isequivalent to admitting to mem¬bership in the mass civilixationswhere the Chicaoo Tribune andits compatriots reign supreme.While the protest may be onlysymbolic in its support, in manyfields of human endeavor the sym¬bol, as in politics, has real signifi¬cance. Symbolic power must pre¬cede and accompany real power.I urge all the students to be atthis protest. The glory of man isthat he strives to improve andchange himself. We may neversucceed in changing society to ourwill but the nobility lies in the ef¬fort itself.Stand up and be counted. Or sitdown and be encountered.DANIEL KESDENUniversity faces terribledilemma on draft policyWriter dismayed overagonizing Viet situationTO THE EDITOR:I watch the growing mire ofVietnam in agony. America seemsperfectly capable of the same sortof war crimes which were laid at TO THE EDITOR:As a member of the group pro¬testing the decision of Dean Wickto submit ranks to the SelectiveService System, it might be ap¬propriate to have my views on thecurrent situation represented, be¬cause it is in the interests of every¬one in the University to obtain thegreatest benefit from this opposi¬tion I think that it would be unfor¬tunate if the campaign merelywere to assume an intense charac¬ter without representing the terri¬ble dilemma which the Universityis facing.At this stage, the immersion ofour country in the world crisis of Vietnam is beginning to affect i^major ways the students on *campus and on other campu.,.JThat the total situation may verywell in fact soon involve us, «flmust be aware. But the nature of;he commitment we are called tomake seems for many of us a com¬mitment which cannot lead to an^>good, to anyone concerned. Burinaddition to these scruples, thereseems to be just as great a diffi¬culty. and that is, in my opinion,;the sacrifice of all of the ideals for1which this institution stands. If itis impossible for the Universit^^shed light on this confused and tur¬bulent situation, but only to add tothe darkness and ignorance whichare causing these violent repercus¬sions, then the entire purpose,meaning, and ways used to put^nEducation into effect will be s ifr¬ied to a wholesale mockery. If infact our education is irrelevant tolife as it exists now oa this planet,and if it is not directed to makingthis world a better place to live in,being rather an excuse fordrawal, then I suggest that the en¬tire University fold up and join thewar, because everything said oth¬erwise is directed to no practicalend; but if, in fact, we aspire tolive up to the true standards ofv.hat an education should be, thenwe have to stand firmly to def%»ieducation and to extend its benefitsas widely as possible. Social prob¬lems are the result of causes,which are complex and, in anycase, very difficult to solve. Withmany of the best minds of thecountry, is it not rather our com¬mitment to figure out these p/%ilems, not perpetrate them?As student protestors, thus far,many of us, myself included, lackthe sophistication and technicalknowledge to add to the solution of♦hese problems ia any major way.But we do know enough to stateunconditionally that our involve¬ment in the war offends all of ourtenets of morality and: all of ourperceptions of the correct paths toattaining the good for the greatestnumber of people. Therefore wecall upon the faculty to join us inthis stand, not only because weneed their numerical support, butbecause they, as the intellectualleaders of this community, ha\^|the greatest amount of power, ex^perience, and insight into these dif¬ficulties. If they are unable to re¬spond in the manner of assertingtheir approach to the world in theplaces it counts the most, then notonly will the student cause suffc^but the entire meaning of an edu¬cation in a prestigious institutionwill be subjected to ridicule, andthe w’orld will be worse off as aconsequence.CHRISTOPHER BOARDMANTHE COLLEGEKindred, anti-drafters reply to last night's policy statementSteve Kindred, an authorized spokesman for the 23-member executive committee of theanti-rank student group, had the following reactions to last night’s statement by the Councilof the Faculty Senate:“The statement issued last night raises only two new points which were not ftealt within other statements of our group. Itaccuses the students who oppose "As far as pressure is con- our point of view is available inthe formation and release of a cgmed, the administration says to our literature; please stop by ourrank lor the Selective Service of students, ‘We have deemed this in- literature tables and talk to us. Wecoercing and pressuring the Lni- formation relevant and it will be deeply regret being forced to takeversity. It also charges us with released; would you like to send it such action, but the continu^cutting off the good old Socratic jn) or woujd you like to be I-A?’ In transformation into a- quiet anildialogue. the past few weeks we have con- willing computer for General Her-“First we would point out that tinually asked the administration shey leaves us no choice.”when Dean Wick announced in the how far they will accept General At yesterday’s Council meetingfirst Maroon of this quarter that Hershey’s criteria of human ex- two spokesmen for the anti-rankclass ranks among males would be pendability. Never have they even group, Miles Mogulescu and Ronformed and released (i.e., when attempted ,to ansvyer this quqstjpq,, ^abty,. wexe to presentthe decision had been made), there : “\ye have tried ,to, initiate a their group’s case to the Counihad quite clearly been none of the meaningful discussjbn since wediscussion which the Council now Wick’s initial annbhneemiMit. Ex^' not ^HoWod ttksstdy’fUi'ther.' iso indignantly accuses us of cutting am$ approach? release 'fbrtns fofc iJ* aihisRi*oti»n w9s -the-reverse ofoff. Realizing the wide diversity of grades and rank will soon be sent; the pCftWMil's sta$d;at. its rovetnigopinion over the draft question on and the rank will be a reality in April 12, when it turned aw aythis campus, one is hardly im- four weeks. Having refused us ad- three members of UO Students forpressed by the administration’s ef- mittance to their meeting a month a Democratic Society, among themforts to discuss thoroughly what ago, the Council now accuses us of Tabor, who tried to participate mUniversity response should be be- cutting off discussion. the Council’s discussion offore they had made their decision. “A more detailed explanation of draft. erethe2 • CHICAOO MAROON • May 10, 1966SO asks administration to restrict useof students' records without permissionby Joan Phillips^ The Student Government (SG) Assembly passed a resolutionurging the University administration to restrict the uses of-^dent records to the internal uses of the University except[when a student specifically requests that his records bereleased ®r revealed at its meet- Shorey to have'guest resident program’* ing last Thursday night.A second SG resolution called fora policy of house self-determina-in establishing the visitationsnvedule in dormitory houses.The resolution on student recordswas provoked by the present Uni¬versity policy of releasing or re¬vealing student records to govern¬ment officials upon request.j lo release or reveal student rec-Toras under any other circum¬stances, or to refuse to releasethem upon the student’s request‘ would violate an important right<>f the student.” the resolutionstates.UNDER THE policy called forii*the resolution, student reeojfpksare lo be released or revealed onlyupon a student’s request or uponpresentation of a valid search war¬rant.According to SG president TomHeagy, “Due to the computeriza¬tion of grade records, the distinc-vx-Tii between a student’s classranking and the rest of his recordscan not be made. Thus the Assem¬bly resolution affirming a student’sright to have his records sentwherever he wants applies to send¬ing his class ranking to his draft,b^»rd.“The Assembly resolution infersthat for the University to refuse todo so (as demanded by some stu¬dents) would be an important vio¬lation of student rights,” Heagydeclared.‘‘The principle that limits on thevihe residents of a dormitoryhouse may have guests in thathouse should evolve solely fromconsideration of the fact that the as secretary while keeping his seatin the Assembly.Bloom declared that on electionnight he had been asked to head an“exciting new committee whosesole purpose would be to coordi¬nate the efforts of SG with those ofthe students and with those of theirelected representatives in order tomeet the many problems that facethe people at UC.”He stated that he had taken theposition of secretary with the un¬derstanding that the paid SG sec¬retaries would do the actual secre¬tarial work and that his committeechairmanship would be forthcom¬ing-Bloom charged that his opposi¬tion to the. GNOSIS slate at the ex¬ecutive committee elections “so in¬furiated party leaders that thepromised substitution of the com¬mittee chairmanship for the secre¬tary’s job was not forthcoming.”"I BECAME, in effect, merelya scribe,” Bloom declared. Hestated that he sees his job as oneinvolving working to alleviate theproblems of the University in suchareas as housing and social rules.Bloom said that he was keepinghis seat in the Assembly becausehe believes that “there must beresponsible opposition in SG, andthere should be as many people aspossible to get Student Govern¬ment’s attention to the importantbasic issues that face us all.”Two newly appointed membersof SG w'ere elected to executivecommittee positions. Jack Kolb,appointed to fill the vacancy crea¬ted by Heagy’s election as SG pres-f presence of non-residents may in¬i' ' fringe on the privacy and freedom ident, was elected chairman of theI of some members of the house” academic affairs committee.was the basis of the resolution call- Paul Levin, appointed to the va-ing for house self-determination in cancy created by David Aiken’s res-Ihe matter of visitation hours. ignation, was elected chairman ofThe resolution states, “We reject $he committee on recognized stu-tlie perogative of any person or dent organizations (CORSO). Fourbody other than the residents ofeach house—either the ean ofStudents, or resident heads—toset visitation limitations for all orand houses.”.*-Under present administrationpolicy, the student housing officesets the maximum limits on visita¬tion hours, and each house maydecrease, but not increase thistime, nor may it shift hours fromone day to another.ALSO AT Thursday's meeting,■“ffo secretary Alan Bloom resignedSTUDENT RELIGIOUS LIBERALSinvite you to hear:"CAN NON-THEISTK RELIGION BE ANETHICAL GUIDE?"Walter LawtonLeader of Chicago Ethical SocietyMeetings are held Wednesdays at 7:30 PM in the parlor of theFIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH1174 Eat* 57th StreetCatalog AssistantFor the young man interested in advertising, who has fulfilledhis draft requirements or is draft-exempt, this is it.Available June 15, with part-time work on Saturdays betweennow and then, is the position of assistant to the man who createsthe catalogs used by this 200 million dollar a year corporation.Y6u ’wffTbe exposed to all aspects of advertising: eopywriting,v layput; supervising, pliotogrjphy sessions, dealing with supplierand sales Personnel, production, Burchssing of paper, binding,type, etc. Beginning salary Is slightly above that offered in directadvertising agency training. m . , iii., , , ,:,J # ■ 'I " W '*•«The essential ingredient for this poet is curiosity and a deslroto learn. Call the Personnel Department at UN 4-6050, Ext. 220for an interview appointment. by Jeff KutaA “guest resident program” which includes the eliminationci many of the duties of a permanent resident head was ap¬proved tentatively Tuesday night for Shorey House by theadministration, according to Shorey House president JackKolb.Through the program members dent plan had called for no per-of the faculty, together with their manent resident head at all, Kolbwaives and possibly their children, was quick to defend the compro-will visit the house for one to two-week periods. They will be treatedas guests and will have none of theresponsibilities of a permanent res¬ident head.INSTEAD, acting as a perma¬nent liaison between Shorey stu¬dents and the administration will mise with the administration.“As we see it now, the programis at least as good as we proposed. . . Obviously the new residenthead's place in the house will beradically different—he’ll act inmore of an advisory capacity."AND MOST important is thebe a head graduate student assist- fact that the administration is will¬ed by two other grad students.Although he will have the title of“resident head,” this head gradstudent will act in a more limitedcapacity than those in mosthouses. Many of his duties are tobe dispersed among Shorey’s stu¬dent-faculty committee and itshouse council.Exactly what the new residenthead’s job will consist of has yet tobe agreed on by the student-facultycommittee and dean of studentsWarner A. Wick.“We saw in such a program achance for a radical change in thestructure and activity of thehouse,” stated Kolb, a third-yearstudent in the College who workedwith the student-faculty committeein getting the guest resident pro¬gram approved."WE CAN now extend our al¬ready broad faculty contact evenfurther by having the faculty ac¬tually participate in the affairs ofthe house,” he added.Shorey’s program of faculty con¬tact has included a number of “fac¬ulty fellows” who regularly attendlunches and dinners; frequentsherry hours and lectures featuringmembers of the faculty; and thestudent-faculty committee, whichconsists of three faculty membersand three students.Although the original guest resi- ing to make major structuralchanges in the house,” Kolb stated.Jay Lemke, a third-year studentin the College and chairman of thestudent-faculty committee, agreed.“No longer will the resident headbe the father, the disciplinarian;no longer will he be an outsider,but a member of the house com¬munity. It’s ironic that one of theprimary reasons the program isbecoming a reality is the fact thatMr. Nitecki has chosen to be an in¬tegral member of the house.”(Matthew H. Nitecki, currentlyShorey’s resident head, plans toleave the house system this sum¬mer. )Kolb said that since the begin¬ning of the quarter he and Lemkehave negotiated with Wick on theoriginal proposal, which was tacit¬ly approved by the Shorey student-faculty committee.A MAJOR factor in the adminis¬ tration’s approval of the plan in itsfinal form, Kolb declared, was arecommendation made by JoshuaC. Taylor, William Rainey Harper,professor of the humanities and aprofessor in the department of art,after a week-long stay in Shoreythis quarter while Nitecki was on aleave of absence.Lemke summarized what he saidwere the three major innovationsof the program:• Education—in the long run, thepotential of the housing system tobe part of the student’s educationalexperience can now be fully real¬ized.• Recognition—t h e administra¬tion is moving In the direction ofrecognizing that students can begiven the responsibility to makemature choices.« Autonomy—the involvements offaculty members in making crucialdecisions within the house systemgives to each house a basis for aconsiderable measure of local au¬tonomy.According to Kolb, 31 facultymembers have already acceptedinvitations for week-long visitsbeginning next quarter—about 90per cent of those who were asked.“We invited basically our friendswho have been associated with thehouse before—but we hope to at¬tract others, too, and these includepeople outside the University, orpossibly members of the board oftrustees, he explained.Lemke said that Wick and deanof the college Wayne C. Booth planto apply to the Foundation for agrant financing the program.NEW BOOKS JUST RECEIVEDStrategies for the Displaced Workerby: George P. Schultz & Arnold R. Weber $4.95A Zoo Man's Notebookby: Lee S. Crandall $4.95The Necessary Revolution in American Educationby: Francis Keppel $5,95The University of Chicago Bookstore5802 Ellis Ave.other members of the Assemblywere elected to CORSO: Jerry Hy¬man, Mark Joseph, Paula Meinetz,and Ed Stern.7"The Assembly also passed a bill'providing for the SG speakers pro¬gram. which will bring to campus“outstanding men in variousfields.” Another bill calling for theconstruction of a central bulletinboard in the area of the bookstoreand the administration building tolist all major campus events waspassed. UNIVERSITY THEATREpresentsMEASUREFORMEASUREShakespeare's Rarely Produced Dark ComedyDirected by James O'ReillyDesigned by Virgil Burnettin MANDEL HALLFRIDAY, SATURDAY& SUNDAYMAY 13, 14, 15at 8:30 PMMATINEE—2:30 SAT.(I FRI.-SAT. fVf / ST.S0 MATINEE A SUN. EVE.FACULTY STUDENT DISCOUNT SQtTICKETS ON SALE NOW REYNOLDS CLUB DESKMay 10, I960 • CHICAGO MAROON • SThe COURT HOUSE in Harper Court- a ; ; toffers to students* Weisiwurit# with Potato Salad• A Stain of Imported Pschorr Munich Bearwith this ad, all for $1.50* (regular 1.80)•$tud#nts under 21 figure less for eoft drinks#••4 Miy •VMilttf In May, 9:10 PM • 1 AM, CImmI anly an Mandaya Why not have your roommate tape your lecture for you?Then you can listen to the soothing drone of a loved mentorwhile you lie in comfort under your electric blanket. Rent atape recorder fromTOAD HALL1444 E. 57th St. IU 8-4500 TAl-SAM-YMCHINOS . AMIRICANRBSTAVRANTCANTOimi AMUAMERICA* DISRGSINN MAILTII AjM. te liN PALORMRS R TARS OUTm«io«eB*dSL mu 4-ieYesterday, you may have had a reasonfor missing a good, nourishing breakfast. •V-',' -i<’ ' \ -♦ * -Today, you don’t\Now you can havenew Carnationinstant breakfast-makes milk a mealthat’s too good to miss.Each glass delivers as much protein as two eggs, as much mineral nourishment as two strips ofcrisp bacon, more energy than two slices of buttered toast, a and even Vitamin C-theorange juice vitamin. It comes in a lot of great flavors, too. Look for them in your cereal section.dJ4 • CHICAGO MAROON • May 10, 1964-H1rll*^ i SteSEEMSProfs stress student draft protectionby Richard Raben, (Continued from page one)Students at UC’s school of social service administration ed out that San Francisco stateiSSA) are currently engaged in planning a student-organized ™versity and Iowa State Collegeconference on the concept of a guaranteed income. The event haVCsets a precedent in its field as a completely student-organizedmeeting. '• y » r —. —— —_The Ad Hoc CommitteeGuaranteed Income, initiated by I.w'k.k ° ' Tthe graduate social work students ^ty;. bu3 the, ^ “ •*will sponsor a “Leadership confer t^i S0„ “?* ,s harmful- Gurrentence on the guaranteed income” on .T,* ,fr0*r*ma a,r*May 21 in the law school auditor!-' ” £ **g£« 'urn. Discussion will focus on theconcept of the guaranteed income,its implications for the poor, andpossible methods of implementa¬tion. The conference will enableprominent leaders of education,government, religion, labor, busi¬ness, and social and civil rightswork to come together and shareideas.THE THEME of the conferenceis based on the notion that the fed¬eral government should guaranteeto every person, as a right, an “in¬come sufficient to maintain a de¬cent level of living.” The studentssponsoring the event regard this as“the proper treatment of povertyin the United States.”In an interview with the Maroon,Irv Garfinkel, chairman of theplanning committee for the confer¬ence, and Charles Hamilton, presi¬dent of the SSA student body, pre¬dicted the formulation of some formof a negative income tax within thenext few years. When the war inVietnam ends, they commented,the federal Office of Economic Op¬portunity will propose some formof guaranteed income both as aweapon for the war on poverty andas a means of curbing a possiblerecession as the economy changesto a peace-time basis. In connec¬tion with these forecasts, the con¬ference will inform the public thatthe concept of a guaranteed in¬come is being discussed by personsin various fields.“The government has a responsi- HE ADDED that the bringing to¬gether of leaders from variousareas of interest with various viewsmay yield a fruitful exchange ofideas as to how the cause of theguaranteed income may be ad¬vanced in various settings. “As so¬cial workers, we are interested inworking with other groups such aslabor and business as well as withour own agencies,” he said.ii.e two students are interestedin the innovation which their proj¬ect represents. Hamilton saw theconference as providing a “forumin which we, as students and stu¬dent social workers, can lead theway in bringing different profes¬sions together to look at a socialissue.” Although no recommenda¬tions will be advanced by the con¬ference, the students feel their goalwill be accomplished “if people goaway with a commitment to exam¬ine this issue in their own set¬tings.” . JTHE CONFERENCE is a prec¬edent in that the planning commit¬tee is composed entirely of stu¬dents. Although the faculty and ad¬ministration has supported the proj¬ect, the students themselves have(Continued on page seven) refused to comply with thepresent Selective Service require¬ments.ROBERTS and Dr. Clifford Gur¬ney, professor of medicine andphysiology, said that the actions ofthese two schools did not influencetheir individual decisions.Roberts added that if manyschools did refuse to comply withSelective Service requirements, hewould be interested in learninghow and why they are able to doso.,Professor of physics Roger Hil¬debrand believes that San Francis¬co State yielded under pressurefrom the student body.“I wouldn’t want a University toestablish policy under pressurefrom coercive pressure groups,” hesaid.CONCERNING the planned sit-in Hildebrand commented, “I am in favor of any peaceful demon¬stration, but any coerciye actionwould have the effect of stoppingdebate and preventing change.”None of the members of theCouncil believed that the threat ofa sit-in has in any way affected theadministration’s willingness tomeet with students.Tabor believes that the adminis¬tration’s meeting Friday night withthe spokesmen for the anti-rankgroup was directly caused by thethreat of a sit-in. McGrath statedthat the proposed sit-in has had astimulating effect on discussion,but has not directly caused a con¬frontation.Flacks believes that the plannedsit-in is putting pressure on the fac¬ulty to take a stand. Before this,faculty members who did not wishto give grades believed that thisaction was against the wishes ofthe students, he said. But now thestudents are demonstrating thatthey too challenge the defermentsystem, Flacks declared.FLACKS proposed that if theUniversity were interested in effec¬ tively altering the present Selec¬tive Service policy, it could mosteffectively work to this end by re¬fusing to cooperate with it.Roberts’ commented that such aproposal “has to be debated in theCouncil.” Hildebrand said, “It is atleast open to debate, but not de¬bate under pressure.”Members of the Council whocould not be contacted for com¬ment were distinguished serviceprofessor of physics William Za-chariasen and professor of lawWalter J. Blum.When contacted last Sundaynight, both Flacks and McGrathsaid that they supported theplanned sit-in, but were undecidedas to whether they would takepart.Come to the Party!Friday the 13that Hiteheoek8:30BOB BELSOB MOTORSImport Centrehr ANMldwoy 1-45*16052 So. Cottage Grove BERKSHIRE STOCKING SALEPre-inventory clearance of all Berkshire hose forwomen. Greatly reduced prices while they last.Regular Price $1.35 pr." " $1.65 pr." " $4.95 pr." " $ .99 pr. Sale Price $ .79 pr.$ .96 pr." " $2.88 pr." ". $ .55 pr.The University of Chicago Bookstore5802 Ellis Ave.Ml 3-31135424 S. Kimbarkwe sell the best,and fix the rest-5* r foreign cor hospital HONDA SOUTH & SOUTH EASTSEE ALL MODELS50 C.C. TO 444 C.C.SALES • SERVICE • PARTS• PICK UP A DELIVERY• EASY FINANCING• LOW INSURANCE RATESMl 3-4500BOB NELSON MOTORS CHICAGO'S LARGEST &613* s cottage grove JUST AROUND THE CORNERSee the MAROON classified for your campus sales representativeUNIVERSITYBARBERSHOP1453 E. 57th ST.FIVE BARBERSWORKING STEADYFLOYD C, ARNOLDproprietor PRE-INVENTORY SALETYPEWRITERSCome in and select the machine you want.A small down payment makes it your machine,and then we will completely over haul itbefore turning it over to you.The University of Chicago Bookstore5802 Ellis Ave.GOD; DEAD OR IN ECLIPSEt CONVERSATION BETWEENREV. WILLIAM HAMILTONProf., Colgate-RochesterDivinity SchoolTuesday, May 10, 8:00 p.m.Admission Free and RABBI RICHARD L. RUBENSTEINHillel Director and Prof,of French Literature,Univ. of PittsburghLAW SCHOOL AUDITORIUM1111 E. 60th StrootAn annual lectureship presented by the B'nai B'rith Hillel Foundation andRockefeller Memorial Chapol in honor of Charles W. Gilkcy, a former deanof the Chapel.THE PUBIN THENew Shot eland Hotel55th & South Shore DriveThe Newest Meeting Place in Old Hyde ParkTHE PUB SPECIAL:Old Fashioned Sauerkraut& Frankfurters 49cEvery Tuesday Night You can have a steaktoo, or the biggeststeakburger in town.Now—A Parade of Piano Artists for Tour Pleasure and Dancing UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGOORATORIO FESTIVAL SERIESROCKEFELLER MEMORIAL CHAPEL59th Street & Woodlawn AvenueLe R0I DAVID(KING DAVID)) .. 4A Symphonic Psalm by A. HoneggerMay 15, 1966 . 3:30 p.m.ROCKEFELLER CHAPEL CHOIR (45 Singers)members of theCHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA (45 Players)with ROGER PILLET as NARRATORDOROTHY LINDEN KRIEG (Soprano)CHARLOTTE BRENT (Mezzo-Soprano)WALTER CARRINGER (Tenor)Under the direction ofRICHARD VIKSTR0MTICKETS AVAILABLE AT:Downtown Graduate School of Business1*0 E. Delaware PieceCooley's Candles, 5210 Harper CourtWoodworth's Bookstore, 1311 I. 57th StrootUniversity of Chicago Bookstore, 3802 S. EllisUC Student/Faculty/Staff $2.50Rosorvod $4.50 . Ganaral Admission $3.50i I’T. May 10, 1966 • CHICAGO MAROON • *!■I'' V’UT to present "Measure for Measure” May 13-15University Theatre’s springproduction will be Shakes¬peare’s Measure for Measureto be presented in Mandel Hallthis weekend. May 13-15. Thisrarely-produced dark comedy about fornication, moral corruptionand political power is the firstShakespeare play to be presentedby UT in four years.The production is totally de¬signed by students in the art de¬partment under the direction of Virgil Burnett, an innovation aboutwhich UT is particularly interest¬ed. as a part of a long-range at¬tempt to extend UT activities to in¬clude students and faculty mem¬bers from all areas of the Univer¬sity.v ... , ./• u. X,_ _ .When school’s out,get in on a good deal.TWA 50/50 Club.TWA CLUB Present this application to any TWA affieg. Or mail to:P. 0. Box 700, Times Square Station, NewYwto, NY. 10036Mr.Mrs.1. Miss-3. Home Address. .City. .2. Date of Birth.State .Zip Code.4. School or Occupation. -Class of.5. PROOF OF AGE Check type of proof submitted with this application. Send photostat, not original, with mailedapplication. □ Birth Certificate □ Driver's License □ Draft Card □ Scheol Record O PassportOther fcfwifyi - -6, Color of hair 7. Color of eyes —8. Enclose $3.00: □ Check □ Money Order (Not refundable. DO NOT MAIL CASH.)NttlonwidtMake check or Money Order payable to Trans World Airlines, Inc. w»rumm» .depend on \9. ^ignar,in> .TWA 80 80 Club i« not availabu on November as, November 37, December 15 through <4, 1960, and January a through A, 1967.Vi off for travel in the USA! Going home or just going places, you can get50% off the regular Jet Coach fare in the U.S. when you fly TWA. Aslong as you're under 22, you're on-most any day of the year except a fewholiday peak-travel periods. Seats are on a stand-by basis—but serviceincludes everything: meals, movies and music, depending on the flight.Here's all you do: fill out the application, prove your age, pay $3 for anID card. Call your nearest TWA office-and we'll make it easy.We’re your kind of airline. • t Through its long association withBurnett, the theatre has been ableto organize a staff of student de¬signers, each handling a single as¬pect of the design. All the cos¬tumes are designed by Nancy Dick-ler, the hats by Sarah Burns,weapons by Michael Merritt, andbanners and tapestries by JanetBaird. The set is designed byBurnett.The play is directed by James O’-Reilly, Director of UniversityTheatre, who is well known for hisproductions of Shakespeare forCourt Theatre. The large cast in¬cludes many actors familiar to UCaudiences, among them AndrewHarris, Martyn Reisbarg, TimEnos, Paul Levin and Don Swan-ton. Performances will be at 5:30 pmon Friday, Saturday and Sundayevenings, and there will be a mati¬nee at 2:30 pm Saturday. Ticketsare on sale at the Reynolds Clubdesk; prices are $2. Friday andSaturday evenings and $1.50 Satur¬day afternoon and Sunday evening.As usual, there is a 50c discountfor students, faculty, and universi¬ty staff.I **«*, Vt W Sr WThe William Vaughn 1Moody Lecture committee |& will present Anne Sexton ^reading from her poems as j*l| its last scheduled event of j§the year. The reading will ^be held in the Wieboldtcommon room, Thursday,May 12, at 4 pm. Mrs. Sex¬ton's works include "ToBedlam and Fart WayBack," and "All My PrettyOnes." In 1965 she waselected a fellow of the Roy¬al Society of literature inLondon.m SiPeace Corps VolunteersIN PARADISE?Would you believe Yap?Saipan? Truk? Palau?Would you believe two years in the South Seasworking in education, health or public works?There are problems in paradise, and the PeaceCorps has been asked to help solve them.This is a brand new program.On May 1,1966, the Peace Corps was invited intothe’Pacific Trust Territory which the U.S. managesfor the United Nations. Needed immediately areliberal arts and science students who aren’t afraidto work — hard.It’s one enchanted opportunity.Fill out the coupon below and air maH It today.*The Peace Corps /Trust TerritoryWashington, D. C. 20525I am interested in going to Micronesia (PacificTrust Territory) for two years as a Peace CorpsVolunteer. I am available to start training thisSummer. Please rush me more information andthe special application by air mail.Mam (Plain print)AddressCity State Zip CadtO< (AC )Can pint Owt pkoat afters• Within 15 day* of receipt of your apodal application (noplacement test la required of candidates for Trust Territorytours) the Peeoe Corps wUi toll you, by phono, ¥ you areaccepted for training. You are not obligated by submittingan application.• • CHICAGO MAROON • May 10,1966Classifieds Experts to address SSA conference1 -.am -i .V.J# • •:v.s '-.v:'.Tr'.'-..*. .. ,..-r .... .<..Personals Roommates for summerInterested in going to Europe this sum¬mer? There are 3 vacancies on StudentGovernment's June 18-September 25charter flight. Only $250. 1 girl to share w/2 others. $38/mo.54th & University. 288-7574. 6/15-10/1.V ant rmmate for summer, maybe long¬er—LUXURY—HY 3-7200.Girl. 21, will babysit +, eves.wk«nds, for summer rm. ft bd. Ph.BU 8-6*10, rm 2210x. Lv. message. 3 fem. grad, studs, need a 4th, own rm.,55th ft Cornell. 667-2280.Male grad, rmmate wanted from 6/15own rm. furn. 6 rm. apt., $43/mo. 5600Drexel, Call Mike-643-9894.Commuter ride wanted from vicinity ofDevon ft Caldwell to campus. Call after5, RO 3-5272. Jobs offeredBike wanted. Male. Barkow. 643-6842.TOURIN'* USA-CANADA-MEXICO. Axeyou Interested? to accompany male ftfemale students for an interesting studytour, your help to plan trip ts wel¬comed. 9tart: around June 15; duration• wks. For further information call: 864-1390 between 6-7 pm.KAMELOT Restaurant, 2160 E. 71st St.10% discount for UC students. ~ w wwa-jsj. mate, itiildlC UU-tV/.Foreign and Entire U.S. 1966 listings.$2.00 postpaid. Summer job guide. Dept.C. 142 High St,, Portland, Maine.Want to rentWRITER'S Workshop -PL 2-8377.Ad Lib Studio-5056 Lake Park—268-6910.Re-Opening special 10-20% Discount onSANDAL'S. 55 styles to choose from,good tiU May 31, 1966.Would yew believe it if I said CAHIERSDU CINEMA called “THE BIRDS’’ oneof the 10 best films of all time??? of1964?? of 1964 by Alfred Hitchcock? of1964 with Tlppi Hedrenli! Come thisWednesday nite, May 11, 7&9 pm. 75cand find out, also see the film.DEATH NOTICEGOD beloved father of many, at a veryold age, of cardiac insufficiency. Serv¬ices Tuesday, May 10, 8 pm at the LawSchool Auditorium. Please omit flowers.Meet me on the Furn. House w/4-5 bdrms. within 45min. UC. July 1, '66-July 31, '67 opti¬mum; Aug. 15, '66 to June 15, '67 poss.Contact O. Sexton, Dept. Zool., Wash-ington Univ., St, Louis, Mo.2 bdrms., furn. up to $150/mo. It. June-Aug. (flex, but must include July andAug.) two Harvard law students (male)working for Chicago law firms. Call col¬lect 617-547-2937, W.S. Williams. Penny-packer 41. Cambridge, Mass. 02138.For saleHppy Brthdy, Chck.grass. Love, D.E. '65 VW, deluxe sedan, grey, leather in-terior, etc. $1450/best offer. 584-3890,'61 VW. ww, radio, new heater. *550337-6848, after 5 pm.'58 Chevy; 1st class running cond. ra¬dio, heater, seat bits. 4-dr. facultyowned $100, MU 4-5553._Rms. 0 apt*, for rentSkeptics, agnostics, believers, atheists, .. .come and picket the annual CharlesW. Gilkev LectureGOD: DEAD OR IN ECLIPSEtonight, 8 pm, Law School Aud.Baseball in color—Ida Noyes. Coffee,cookies, etc. 2-5 pm.The controversy tdebate?) of the cen¬tury: Rev. William Hamilton (vs?)Rabbi Richard L RubensteinGOD: DEAD OR IN ECLIPSERichard L. RubensteinTuesday (tortile), 8 pm. Law SchoolThe DEADLINE for Maroon classi¬fieds has moved up to 11 am, day be¬fore paper. Must be prepaid. 2 need 3rd or 4th for apt. 3 blks fromquads, starting Oct. 1, own rm. furnreas. "Wuggi«~ PL 2-9647.Wanted, male grad to share 5>/a rm.apt. w/2 others for summer ft nxt. yr.5340 Harper. $52/mo. Nr. IC, Co-op.Smedley’s. 752-8904.Want female rmmate to share 5 rm.apt. near 55th ft Kimbark. Part furn.$6J/mo./person. MU 4-4235 eves.~ "HOTEL SHORELANDSpecial student rate. Hotel rmi. withprivate baths, 2 students/rm. *45/stu-dent per mo. Complete Hotel Service.Ask for Mr. N.T. Norbert, 5454 S. ShoreDrive. (Continued from page five)managed all the details for theconference, Including the fund¬raising. Since the idea was formu¬lated early last month, the stu-Schomer resigns(Continued from page one)of the American Management As¬sociation.Commenting on his unusual deci¬sion to leave the presidency of theChicago Theological Seminary atthe age of fifty, Dr. Schomer said:*T believe that Chicago Seminaryis moving swiftly into the mostproductive years of its 111-yearhistory. The faculty and students ithas gathered together have ex¬traordinary imagination, commit¬ment and drive. The potentialitiesof the new Chicago Institute forAdvanced Theological Studies, ofwhich it is proud to be a foundingmember, are unsurpassed anywherein the country. The next phase ofthe presidential task is sure to in¬clude still heavier administrativeresponsibilities and fund-raising la¬bors. I simply have no interest inmore administrative and financialtasks. As a man primarily con¬cerned with people and ideas, withwriting, lecturing and preaching,and with action-programs for thedevelopment of greater unityamong the different races and re¬ligions of the world, I am gratefulto our seminary trustees andfaculty for their understanding ac¬ceptance of my resignation at thiatime.” dents have raised $1000 from var¬ious sources. Some prominent so¬cial-welfare organizations havethemselves mailed out personal in¬vitations. ‘‘To our knowledge, noth¬ing like this has ever taken placebefore,” said Hamilton.The students have planned theconference with the view that so¬cial action is an integral part ofsocial work. Discussion will includeconsideration of the proposal ofRichard Cloward, professor of so¬cial policy at the Columbia schoolof social work, who urges commu¬nity organizations to organize themillions of poor who are either notgetting public welfare assistanceor getting less than what they areentitled to; in this way, explainsGarfinkel, Cloward believes thepeople can bring about a restruc¬turing of the income maintenancesystem.The students have also estab¬lished a committee to publish amonthly newsletter following theconference. The purpose of thenewsletter will be ‘‘to serve as aclearing house for material on the guaranteed income and make ftcontinuing evaluation of the cur¬rent public welfare programs andlocal community efforts to organ¬ize public assistance recipients.”A faculty team defeated asquad of varsity lettermerw27 to5 in a softball game Sunday.Playing in the field adjoiningPiereo Tower, the faculty team,including Fredrick Siegter, as¬sociate professor of humanities,John May, assistant professor efpolitical science, Stuart Tave,professor of English, and MarkAshin, associate professor efEnglish, consistently capitalizedon the incredibly numerous er¬rors ef the varsity.The varsity, whose players re¬quested that they net be indenti-fiod, never hit T*ve's pitchinghard tnough to give the facultythe chance to make any seriouserrors.The game lasted seven Inn¬ings, with balloons amt icecream given away by thg Orderef the C, the iettermen'* or¬ganization, to players and spec¬tators.Summer subletsIdeal for 3-4 June 15-Sept. 25. 6 If. furn.ms. + sunporch. Near campus, shop¬ping, IC. $150/mo. 5309 Woodlawn. 643-6669 after 5 pm.67th ft Maryland, furn. house, 6 rms. 2baths, for summer, flSO/mo. For faml-ly. DO 3-3710.7 Spacious rma.. 4 bdrms., completelyfurn., $130. 60th Wdln, FR 4-4720.Lf. mod. 3 rm. apt. E. 50th PI. furn.,mod. elect, kitchen, $120/mo. 288-6733Jeffery ft 72nd. 5 rms. furn. ideal for 3-$115/mo. 288-7991.PIZZA PLATTER1500 Hyde Park Btvd.Kt 6-6606 KS 6-3091Delivery .25TABLE 3CHVICIPIZZA AND ITALIAN POODSANDWICHESVa SPIED CHICKENFRENCH FRIES COLI SLAWROLL ft BUTTER$1.50TOYOTA SOCIAL SCIENCES COLLEGIATE DIVISIONPublic LectureNORMAN JACOBSONProfessor of Political Science*,University of California, BerkeleyPOLITICSand thsCRISIS OP MODERNITYTveedey, Mey 17, 4:f0, Breasted HaltAdmission it without ticket er charge KEYPUNCHING• 500 CARDS OR MORE •• FAST TURN AROUND •FOR ESTIMATE CALLSHEILA BLIXT 332-470BR. SKIRMONT A ASSOCIATES, INC.33 NORTH LsSALLE STREETCHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602COMPUTER APPLICATION CONSULTANTS"SPECIAL STUDENT DISCOUNT1 yr. free maintenance1900 C.C. Sport* Car Actien.Auto. Tran*. Avail.»1714 90 H.P.100 M.P.H.SALES - SERVICE - PARTS247-1400 - 3967 S. Archer PHILLIPS JEWELRY COMPANY”50% OFF ON ALL DIAMONDENGAGEMENT & WEDDING RINGS"67 E. Madison Room 1101 Di 2-6500Campus Representative: E. GLASGOW — Ext. 3265 or 6244512 REMAINDER SALEMany titles remain.Were published at $2.50 to $20.00Now $.99 to $9.95Until May 16THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO BOOKSTORE5802 EIHs Ave.BUY NOW.SAVE NOW.PAY LATER.BuUt-To-LastCHECKER/^*Sedans e Station WagonsLimousinesCHECKER TOWNE SOUTH INC.3967 SOUTH ARCHER AVENUI247-1400 Salta & Service THE CHICAGOSYMPHOHY ORCHESTRAJEAN MARTINON, Music DirectorTHURSDAY FRIDAYMAY 26, 1966 MAY 27, 1966PROGRAMELEGY FOR ORCHESTRA Kenneth GaburoINVOCATION-CONCERTO FOR VIOLIN AND ORCHESTRA Ralph ShapeyEsther Glazer, violinistConducted by the composerVARIATIONS Luigi DallapiccolaTHREE PIECES FOR ORCHESTRA Seymour ShifrinMANDEL HALL 8:30 pAdmission: $2.50, general (UC faculty, $2.00), and $1.00 studentTickets only at Concert Office, 5802 Woodlawn Avenue (60637); Ml 3-0800, extension 3886May 10, 1966 CHICAGO MAROONBooth calls for reasoned discussion on the draft(Continued from page one)the Committee of the Council onFriday evening. Many discussionshad been held before the ultima¬tum; more could have been held inany case. But any meeting that iscalled now is reported as proofthat results can be obtained onlywith threats.)I think that our main task at thismoment is to restore the conditionsof free discussion—that is, to getthrough Wednesday with dignityand calm and a chance of continu¬ing where we were forced to leaveoff.There are, of course many unre¬solved moral and intellectual prob¬lems surrounding our attempts atdiscussion. There is a conflict ofinterpretation about whether theuniversity’s provision of ranks is acase of changing policy for nation¬al interest. There is a conflictabout whether the university’smoral responsibility to the “nation¬al interest’’ is overridden by itsmoral responsibility to some othersuperior principle or educationalgoal. There is a conflict about theclaim that students have a right tobelong to this or that universitycommittee. There is a conflict ofinterpretation of the actual facts ofour present and past practice. Ihave only recently learned that theuniversity did compile and usemale rankings until 1963, and thatlast year “information includinggrades, admission rating, testscores, and so forth, were collectedand stored on tape; at the close ofthe year grade point average sta¬tistics were compiled by year in the College by field interest, bysex, and mean quartile, and centilerank and grade point averageswere computed.” There is conflictover the relative harm for relativenumbers of students resulting fromranking and not ranking. (Ofcourse the moral issue of rank¬ing is not answered by calcu¬lating relative numbers that willbe drafted, but students should bequite clear that not providingranks while providing grades willwork a great hardship on studentsat places like Chicago: a C recordhere might mSan that a student isin the upper half, but it will notlook good—without the correctionprovided by rankings—by compari¬son with a B record from mucheasier universities.) There is con¬flict over whether providing rankswill harm or help our admissionspolicy. Finally, there is conflictover the morality and educationaleffect of the draft law itself. (Mostfaculty and students I talk with donot like the 2S deferment, andwould favor either a lottery or auniversal draft of the kind beingadvocated nationally this week.)The University had already initiat¬ed a national inquiry (see Presi¬dent Beadle’s statement of lastFriday) before the threat of a sit-in and it had declared its intentionto continue discussions to find andurge a better national policy andto find an agreed-on universitypolicy.I had no question, even beforethis week, that the presence of thedraft, and the form of the draft, isharmful to education here andelsewhere. The flurry of the last few days has made the harm evenclearer to me (when do we starteducating again?). It has also madeclearer what now seems to me thedifficult of discovering, so long asthe draft is with us, a policy thatdoes no harm.But this does not mean weshould stop trying to find a betterpolicy. I am personally hoping thatthe University can sponsor im¬mediately a major conference ofnational university leaders to pre¬pare a draft of a policy plea to goto Selective Service. I also chooseto believe the statement in Fri¬day’s Maroon that the Committeeof the Council will continue. to from the one attributed to Mr.Wick in the summary statement—either a sign of misreporting or asign that discussion has in fact hada real effect on policy).If we can deal with each otherrespectfully on Wednesday, placinginto the record without violence thepassion with which we all hold ourpositions on the touchy matters,we may be able to renew onThursday the processes of free dis¬ cussion on which a university mustlive if it is to live at all. If we can¬not, it will not be the first timethat academics committed to thebuilding of reasonable institutionshave lapsed from their ideals. Andit will not mean, fortunately, theend of the university. But it wift bea far greater blow to our chancesof defending educational quality ina difficult time than anyone hasyet delivered.Calendar of eventsTuesday, May 10sponsor discussions, as they have LECTURE: Descartes and the mind-tried to do even during the ultima- Circle, Mandel Hall, 10:30 am.turn period, among students, facul- film: “The concrete jungle,” docty, and administration, and with films, Soc Sci 122,7-. 15 and 9-. 15.other universities. I am aware that lecture: “The unseen hand in eco-manv ctnrlptiK arp wnrripH ahnut nomics and politics, Milton Friedman, .many siuaenis are worried aDoui professor Gf economics, sponsored by V*ECTlshortness of time: “If we don t get whig society, Eckert 133 (ins e 58), 8 “action now, the quarter will end pm-and ranks will be sent in August lecture: ‘‘God: dead or in, , . ° eclipse? a conversation between Rev.When they are asked for, and it William Hamilton, professor, Colgate-will be too late.” My own convic- Rochester divinity school, and Rabbi.. , , , . Richard Rubenstein, professor oftion, arrived at after an intensive French literature. University of Pitts-and painful review of my earlier bur8h, law school auditorium, 8 pm.statement in opposition to ranking, folk dancing: international house,is that even such an outcome pm‘ .... . ..Wednesday, May 11LECTURE: “National urban policy.”Martin Meyerson, dean, school of envi¬ronmental design, former acting chan¬cellor, University of California, Berk¬eley, Judd 126, 10:30 am.would produce less educationalharm and personal injustice to ourstudents and other students thansimply withholding ranks unilater¬ally. But I am also convinced thatonce the sit-in is over we can move LECTURE: "The psychological novel inJapan.” Howard Hibbitt, professor,quickly toward the kind of discus- Harvard university, Soc Sci 122. 4 pm.sion which alone can determinewhether the present policy, as an¬nounced on Friday, should indeedbe changed. (Perhaps I shouldpoint out that it is very different SIT-IN: Administration building, firstfloor, 3 pm.FILM: “The birds.” by Alfred Hitch-cock, Soc Sci 122, 7 and 9 pm.MEETING: Special education in Eu¬rope, Pi Lambda Theta, Judd Hall com¬mons room, 7:30 pm. LECTURE: “Freedom and authority inmodern society,” Morris Janowitz, pro¬fessor of sociology, seventh floor,Pierce Tower, 7:30 pm.LECTURE: “Can non-theistic religionbe an ethical guide?” Walter Lawton,Chicago ethical society first Unitarianchurch, 1174 E 57, 7:30 pm.RE: “Quantum fluids.” Lotharprofessor of chemistry, room L-8 research institute, 5640 Ellis, 8 pm.Thursday, May 12SYMPOSIUM: “Energy exchange inmolecular systems,” Kent chemical lab¬oratory, 9:30 am and 2 pm.LECTURE: “Ecological succession andhuman exploitation, Ramon Margalef,Instituto de Investigationes Pesqueras,Barcelona, Spain, Zoology 14, 4:30 pm.MEETING: “Pediatrics,” with Dr. Al¬bert Dorfman, pre-med club, BillingsM-137, 7 pm.FOLK DANCING: Hillel house, instruc¬tion, 7:30, general dancing 9 pm.LECTURE: ‘‘Sodbusters, sharecrop-pers, and the American empire, 1865-1901,” William Appleman W illiams, pro¬fessor of history. University of Wiscon¬sin, Ida Noyes hall, 8 pm.BUS TO CONGRESS CIRCLEFOR THOSE TAKING DRAFT TEST$1.00 Round Trip Reservationsat Student Government Office DR. AARON ZIMBLER, OptometristIN THENEW HYDE PARK SHOPPING CENTER1510 E. 55th St.DO 3-7644 DO 3-6866EYE EXAMINATIONSPRESCRIPTIONS FILLED CONTACT LENSESNEWEST STYLING IN FRAMESStudent A Faculty Discount BUY HER APLUSH ANIMALA building full of exotic camels,big bulls, 6 foot giraffes, hugepandas, ferocious tigers, biggestlong hair dogs, monkeys, alliga¬tors, bears, and others.ANIMALWONDERLAND5960 W. OGDEN AVENUECICERO, ILL.OL 6-9854In the first Maroon of this quarter, Dean Wick announced thatan administrative decision to form male class ranks for the drafthad been made. From the beginning increasingly largenumbers of students and faculty expressed through all availablechannels of communication, extreme distress at this quiet steptoward the transformation of this University into a coding andclassifying machine for the Selective Service, accepting and em¬bodying all of General Hershey’s discriminatory criteria of humanexpendability. We realize the frustrating inadequacy of an opposi¬tion to the formation of a class rank, which is just one manifes¬tation of the arbitrariness, discrimination, and coercion of theSelective Service System. But when our University, without amurmur, takes a further step, implicating and entangling it, andeach of us, more deeply within that system of discrimination, wemust say NO. At April’s secret meeting of the Council of theUniversity Senate, Provost Edward Levi stated his opinion thatthere was no real reason for the Council to be discussing theAnti - Rank Meeting problem. After the draft forum on Wednesday, April 29, DeanWick repeated his attitude toward student distress: ‘ HELL NO,STUDENTS DON’T RUN THIS UNIVERSITY AND IT’STIME THEY LEARNED THAT.” The statements demonstratesthat behind all the discussion, “channels of communication,” andminor changes in the wording of policy is an immutable adminis¬trative decision. We have tried hard to set into motion meaning¬ful discussion aimed at serious consideration of University policy.Our concerns have been dismissed as “irrevelent” and “trivial”from the start. Soon exams will be pressing students, release formsfor grades and rank will have been sent out, and the rank will beanother fait accompli.” We de ply regret that the only course ofaction left open to us is the occupation of our administrationbuilding. But faced with the administration’s insincere and in¬transigent attitude, WE HAVE NO CHOICE. JOIN US ONWEDNESDA Y.MEETING OF SUPPORTERSTO CONSIDER FINAL PLANS FORWi'tS ai«vsda>*s Demonstration ■ Return to anti-rank lit. tables or tonights meeting■■ Since the formation of a class rank among males constitutes am significant institutional step forward in cooperation with the re-quirements of the war situation, and since it would require the useH of my grades although I conscientiously oppose such use, I strong-■ ly urge that such a rank not be formed and, in any case, refuse to■ have the product of my educational efforts incorporated into such® a device.signature name (print)Bj—| undergradmale7:30 Ida Noyes [ 1 faculty| | female-supporting statementj graduate—supporting statement addressphone dept/dive • CHICAGO MAROON • May 10, 1966