Humber of requests triples289 petition to be releasedfrom residence requirement289 petitions for releasefrom the housing requirementhave been received by the of¬fice of student housing. Thisrepresents nearly three times asmany as last year.Eighty two first year men, includ¬ing those who wish to move to fra¬ternity houses, have submittedpetitions. 77 first year, 98 secondyear, 40 third year, and two fourthyear women have also applied forpermission to live outside the dor¬mitory system.Last year, 104 petitions werereceived, 27 from first year wom¬en, 50 from second year women,and 25 from men. Of the 104, over90 per cent were granted.According to Dean of StudentsWarner Wick, it is doubtful wheth¬er the same percentage of peti¬tions will be granted this year be¬cause of the exceedingly largenumber submitted.The petitioning procedure wasinitiated to coexist with a residen¬tial college, rather than be itsmeans of destruction, Wick said.It was intended to excuse a mi¬nority rather than a majority ofundergraduates from the regula¬tions if they had good reasons forwanting to live outside the housingsystem.As long as the number of Peti¬tions is reasonably small, all peti¬tions can be considered solely ontheir merits, said Wick. But whenthe number gets as large as it isnow, external, more or less arbi¬trary factors will enter into con¬sideration.Wick said that first year studentswill probably find it hardest to gettheir petitions granted, and thatthird-year students with “stable,good records” will be given pref¬erence.Last year, assistant Dean of Stu- Vol. 71 — No. 97 University of Chicago, Wednesday, April 24, 1963dents James E. Newman statedthat the policy of the housing officewas to grant all petitions “unlessthere was some positive ground fordenial.”The residence requirement, whichwas announced in 1960, requiresall undergraduate women and firstand second year undergraduatemen to live in university housing.Men living in fraternity houses orstudents living at home are auto¬matically excused from the re- Student Government (SG) elected GN OSIS social sciences representative Don Cong-quirement. Before 1960, students don, its president last night by a vote of 26-23. Congdon, who had been slated for the postwere required to live in dormito- by his party’s caucuses last weekend, narrowly defeated GNOSIS College representativeries only during their first year, and GNOSIS president Jerry Hyman.Originally, Congdon had 28 votes,Congdon is new SG president3 UC professors elected toNational Science AcademyFred Egan, professor in the University’s Philipine Studies Hyman had five votes, and POLITcandidate Bruce Rappaport had 16votes. On the second ballot, all ofRappaport’s votes changed to Hy¬man. Four GNOSIS representa¬tives voted for Hyman: Charles, pro' Adams, M. Bernstein, Lewis Lea-department of anthropology, gram, and author of Social Or- vitt, and Hyman. Robert AxelrodDwight Ingle, professor in the Sanization of the Western Pueblos. of the Liberal Party, and A1 Levydepartment of physiology, andClyde Hutchison, professor in thedepartment of chemistry, wereamong 34 scientists from through¬out the nation elected to the Na¬tional Academy of Sciences yester¬day.Eggan, Harold H. Swift distin¬guished service professor, is chair¬man of the department of anthro¬pology. Ingle is chairman of thedepartment of physiology, andHutchison is the Carl WilliamEisendrath professor in the depart¬ment of chemistry and the En¬rico Fermi Institute for NuclearStudies. The total number of UCmembers of the Academy is now29.mEggan, who received his Ph.D.from UC in 1933, is an authorityon the social organization of Amer¬ican Indians and peoples of thePhilippines. He is director of the Ingle, known for his pioneer re¬search on the biological activitiesof cortisone and for a long seriesof studies on the relation of corti¬cal hormones to cancer and otherdiseases, is co-editor of Perspec¬tives in Biology and Medicine, ascientific journal. He came to UCin 1953.Hutchison has been a memberof the faculty since 1945 and waschairman of the department ofchemistry from 1959 until 1962.He is an authority on the magneticproperties of matter, with specialattention to relationships betweenparamagnetic resonance and theelectronic structure of crystallinesystems.In 1942, Hutchison became as¬sociated with the Manhattan proj¬ect, which helped develop theatomic bomb. He also served asa consultant of Aiwj~ne NationalLaboratory. , of the Law School Party also sup¬ported Hyman.Besides Congdon, six other GNO¬SIS representatives were electedto positions on the 10-man SG Ex¬ecutive Committee. Also, one mem¬ber each was elected from POLIT,the Liberal Party, and the LawSchool Party.Hyman defeated Rappaport. bya vote of 26 to 17, for the positionof vice-president. Both Bev Splaneand David Beal were unanimouslyelected SG secretary and treasurerrespectively.Eugene Groves defeated Rappa¬port for the position of chairmanof the National Student AssociationCommittee by a vote of 28-17.Nancy Kudriavetz defeated Rappa¬port, 27-20, for the position of chair¬man of the Community RelationsCommittee.For the position of chairman ofthe Committee on Recognized Stu¬dent Organizations, law studentWilliam Schaap defeated Axelrod, 23-17. For the next position, chair¬man of the Election and RulesCommittee, Axelrod defeated GNO¬SIS social sciences candidate DanReber 24-17.In a close vote, POLIT’s DickJacobson defeated GNOSIS’ TomHeagy for the position of CampusAction Committee chairman, 19-18.Jerry McBeath (GNOSIS-college)defeated POLIT candidate SteveBoyan, 26-18 for the chairmanshipof the Student-Faculty RelationsCommittee.At the beginning of the meetingit was announced that RichardGold, Arlene Hansen, and StanleyWallen had been given seats fromthe Biological Sciences, the Gradu¬ate Library, School, and the Schoolof Education, respectively. Ineach case, the persons with whomthey had been tied after the springelection declined to be seated.In a statement after the meet¬ing, President Congdon said “Iam very gratified to have beenhonored by being given the posi¬tion of president of the SG Assem¬bly. I pledge myself to fulfill thisrole to the best of my capacity.“I feel that the Assembly hasmade a wise choice in accepting itsExecutive Committee, and I hopethat all members of this bi-par¬tisan body will unite in serving thebest interests of the student body.”Interfaith colloquium stresses common problemsRylaarsdam: Notes on the cry for justiceJ. Coert Rylaarsdam opened the Cohen: We await return of ChristendomJewish-Protestant Colloquium on theGood Society Tuesday morning,speaking on the common groundand basic differences that lie betweenJews and Christians.Rylaarsdam, professor of Old Testamenttheology in the UC Divinity School statedthat the members of the colloquium, “arehere to compare notes on the shape of thecry for justice today. We are eager tounderstand more clearly the nature of thesociety in which we all participate. Wewant to take common counsel for its well¬being, for we feel responsible for it.”According to Rylaarsdam the most es¬sential condition of the Colloquium is thatits participants meet as Christians andJews, each standing on his own confes¬sional platform as he addresses the other.“These platforms may overlap, buteach has its own structure. We meet notto become one, but to remain two. Wemeet not only to understand our worldand its needs, but to confess the livingGod.Rylaarsdam argued that the distinctiveaspect of the colloquium and its purposesis that it springs from the basic similari¬ties and differences of the two faiths. “Weshare a common ground because we bothconfess the One living God; but we differin our confessions. We are here asSpokesmen, or at least as voices, of twoseparate and historically hostile commu¬nities of faith. We live out of rival cove¬nants, eacff of which claims to be uniqueand eternal. Both of us have confessedthat God has chosen us; so each hasimpugned the authorization of the other.”Therefore, before Jews and Christianscan discuss their common responsibility tothe world, they mnst at least know wherethey stand in relation to each other. “Wemust address each other and respond toone another. There must be the beginningof a Dialogue between us. If this is reallyto be a Colloquium of Jews and Chris¬tians, each of us must first find a way ofacknowledging the authenticity and theabiding legitimacy of the divine vocationof the other.”According to Rylaarsdam honest at-temps at conversation between Jew andChristian have rarely occurred. On theofficial and institutional level the onlydiscussions that have occurred in nearly two thousand years were the so-calledcompulsory disputes, set up by the Churchwith the scarcely veiled intention of“humiliating the Jew, plundering him, ordislodging him from such precarious se¬curity as he might have achieved for him¬self on the margins of a Christian society.”. According to Rylaarsdam, the first bigstep towards conversation between Jewand Christian in our century was taken inGermany. “The renaissance of Jewishfaith and theological thought in pre-HitlerGermany included the appearance of twovery powerful, dedicated, and originalJewish voices: Franz Rosenzweig andMartin Buber.”“Different as their ways of approachare, Buber and Rosenzweig both stressthe concreteness, the particularity, andthe this-worldliness of Jewish faith as Arthur Cohen, noted Jewish au¬thor and publisher, delineated thegreat disparities between Jewishand Christian conceptions of manand his religious calling Tuesday in themorning session of the Jewish-Protestantcolloquium: “Perspectives on the GoodSociety.”According to Cohen, “the Jew uponwhom the Christian depends for his firstknowledge of God is no longer the lonely,passionate lyricist who is the paradig¬matic Jew of the Old Testament. He hasbecome a creature intent upon sustaininga vision which is finally indifferent to thethreats and challenges of historical ad¬versaries. He has long since rejected anyJesus who might be the Annointed.”“The Christian, moreover, is no longerin need of any Old Testament. The livingEditor's Note: This is the first of a two part series on problems that weretreated in the Jewish-Protestant colioquim "Perspectives on the Good So¬ciety” at the Center for Continuing Education yesterday. These two ar¬ticles dealt with problems of basic similarities and differences that con¬front any effort to carry on Jewish-Christian dialogue. The second articlesdeal, with common responsibilities for social justice common to both faiths.over against the Christians. Both knowthat God has called them as Jews. Butthey can also acknowledge that Christiansare called of God. This is the basis forrespect and for dialogue from the Jewishside they provided.”“The next move is up to the Christian.The weight of this responsibility is on theAmerican Christian, especially. The spir¬itual heartland of the Diaspora was oncein Babylonia; then it was in Spain andafter that in Central Europe. Now it hascrossed the ocean and is here in ourmidst.”Rylaarsdam argued that the capacity ofthe Jewish spirit to respond to the agonyof the second World War in enduranceand self-affirmation was a measure of theinexhaustible resource at the center ofthe Jewish existence. “Whether in agonyor in refreshment, Israel endures as longas time. That is her faith, and her witnessis the same in every century: God is notovercome by the evil of tyranny: he over¬comes it.”“This mystery of an eternal Israelembarrasses the Christian. As a humanbeing it fills him with awe, pity, andadmiration; but it contradicts his faith.(Continued on page 3) Christian recalls the traditions and wit¬nesses of the early Church which havebecome his “old” or historically pastwitness to the Christ. Therefore, the Jewand the Christian, it would appear, havenothing to say to one another, except inso¬far as they speak beyond and in spite offaith. But if it were true that we haveno cause to regard one another, then ourcontinuous historical collusion would be¬come more horrendously irrational andour historical alienation even greatercause for dispair.”Cohen argued that, on the contrary, “itis the case that we may adduce our con¬tinuous historical collusion as evidencethat we are unable to avoid one another,that our endurance before each other isproof of our interconnection, that in someobscure and indefinite way, we are foreach other an obligatory testimony.” 'According to Cohen, this great historicalcollusion which has been characterized byrejection and persecution, “is the conse¬quence of defective understanding, a de¬fault of mutuality, a refusal to acknowl¬edge that though the Father may be Oneand solitary, that his providence may bevarious and complimentary. We return then to the primary question: What saysthe Jew of Jesus as the Christ?”“It might be said that Jesus was, asfar as the Palestinian Judaism of the firstcentury is concerned, a remarkable re-ligio-political eccentric to whom greatattention was paid by the Jewry of theEmpire. The Petrine Church, the commu¬nity of Jewish Christians, who were obedi¬ent to the Law, might well have come tobe regarded to regnant Jewry as heresyto be calmly fought and as calmly re¬turned in penitence to the Synagogue.”“That the Pharisees judged Jesus to befalse was inescapable, but that his disci¬ples judged Jesus—in spite of cintuedeschatological disappointment and post¬ponement to be still true—this is for methe miraculous misjudgment which is acontinuing source of wonder and baffle¬ment. It is, therefore, for me a Jew, asmuch a mystery that Christianity survivedand triumphed, as it is a mystery forChristianity that the unconverted Jewpersists, not only in his unbelief, but inthe confident assertion that he is stillchosen by God.”In addressing himself to the continu¬ance and confidence which the Jewishrejection of Christ has accumulatedthrough the centuries, Cohen discussedseveral passages from St. Paul.“Paul affirms that all men are underthe power of sin. If then all men areequally condemned before God, then sure¬ly there can be no difference betweenTorah and Jesus other than that the Torahpromises the inheritance of the future.wrhile the Christian proclaims salvationas accomplished.”“While the Torah is turned to the fu¬ture, damnation is immediate. This is apersuasive rhetoric to unhappy Romanswho know not what it is the Torah prom¬ises, but know too well what it is theirhour demands.In continuing his discussion of Paul,Cohen stated that the mystery of Israel tothe nations is that it regards the gift ofthe Annointed to the pagan as a “fortuity,in no way integral to the life of Israel.”This position is logically comprehensibleand meaningful only if the Messianism ofIsrael is tied to the End, the real End.If the Christ returns and the End is notwith his coming, then surely Israel isjustified in its first refusal. But if he(Continued on page 3)&lym.|Hfjl? J EDITORIAL1mamm ■ I; iTen modest proposals Letters to the editorHits Eve Jones’ letterNever the ones to impede “pro¬gress,” we would like to wish theUniversity luck in its latest en¬deavor, which for some reasonseems to have evoked a bit ofcriticism: putting undergraduatewomen over a mile away in theHarper Surf. We suppose that theabsurdity and sheer stupidity ofexpecting women to live in aneighborhood they are told is dan¬gerous from the moment theyarrive here has escaped the Uni¬versity. And we also suppose thatthe University, which, as DeanNewman so eloquently explainedrecently, does not make rules toplease parents but “legislates forits own community in order toachieve its own educational ends,”will be inclined to discount theobjections that many parents haveraised to the Harper dorm.Despite our hesitance to offer ad¬vice to an institution which hasopenly displayed such moral tur¬pitude, imagination, and wisdomin its housing policies, we havewith great effort summoned upour courage to present some sug¬gestions which we feel warrantnothing more than immediate andpositive action.If the University is going toinsist on holding its undergrad¬uates to a residence requirement,it must also be willing to meetthe obligation of providing themwith decent housing. Therefore,graduate students who are notbeing forced to live in universityhousing as are undergraduates,should not be offered any dormi¬tory space until all undergradu¬ates have been placed. Specifically,this means that if any students areto be subjected to the prospect oflife in the Harper Surf, it shouldbe graduate students, who are freeto reject it.Further, we strongly urge thatno undergraduate woman be putin the position of having to live inthe Harper Surf if she does notwant to. In other words, it painsus to think of our great and en¬lightened University forcing wo-ment to live where they do notwant to, especially since their ob¬jections are based on concern fortheir safety rather than on any¬thing as tendentious as sincere dis¬agreement with University regu¬lations. Put women who don’t needlarge closets into Pierce Tower.We don’t understand why the Uni¬versity is so concerned with thelack of closet space in Pierceitdidn’t bother anyone in C-Group.Now', although we realize theadministration has many far moreimportant problems to deal withthan acting as the “in loco parent”of its students, we cannot help buthope that the sheer absurdity oftheir undoubtedly hasty decisionon the Harper Surf will makethem at least reconsider; for afteronly five minutes of thinking, wecame up with ten alternatives toputting undergraduate women inthe Harper Surf: Put women into one or twohouses of Burton-Judson, or intoUniversity-owned apartments on61 Street. If the University is wil¬ling to let women court danger bywalking 1.15 miles to the HarperSurf, it certainly cannot objectto their walking one block acrossthe Midway.Put women into half of 5400Greenwood, as planned for thesummer. This “undergraduate”dormitory is largely graduate nowanyway.Replace the graduate women in5518 Ellis with undergraduates.Put women in Snell-Hitchcockand give the foreign students schol¬arships large enough for them tolive on.Convert any of a large numberof apartment houses the Univer¬sity owns into “approved” hous¬ing considered equivalent to dor¬mitories for meeting the residencerequirement. We are not convincedthat a night matron and a centralmail-sorting telephone-answeringunit are necessary prerequisitesfor a successful residential system.Postpone the conversion of C-Group into offices for one ormore years until the necessaryand reasonably adequate housingfor women is found or constructed.And, if a complement to PierceTower is to be built and it is toolate to find another architect, re¬design the interior of the second“Pierce” so that it has as manysingles as C-Group or 5426 Har¬per has.Grant all petitions and let thewomen fend for themselves. Theycertainly couldn’t be any worsethan the Harper Surf.Abolish the residence rule.Move the Beadles into RobieHouse, where UC’s first lady canemulate the nation’5 first ladyand give periodic tours. Then,move students into the President’sHouse. Its six bathrooms, if theyall have showers, would be ade¬quate for 64 women by C-Grop’sstandards.Or, if 5426 Harper seems to bean irrevocable decision, have a freecampus bus running every tenminutes 20 hours a day (We as¬sume that hours mean no bus isneeded between 3 and 7 am),lower the rents, and let the womenfurnish their own rooms (Theycould do so at half the cost theUniversity would incur, and prob¬ably with much better taste). TO THE EDITOR:Miss Jones’ letter shockingly re¬veals that the writer of the ‘Freudfor the Family’ column in one ofour Chgo. newspapers is neitherthe night-desk clerk nor a MissLonelyhearts. Her letter to theMaroon, instead of showing a dif¬ferent side to her syndicated per¬sonality, is consistent with the out¬rageous and dangerous banality ofher column, elevated somewhat forits college readers by the insertionof more technical psychologicalterminology such as “coitus” and“narcissistic” who does she thinkshe’s talking to? . . .”Obviously, Mr. Sander’s attackwas not a full treatment of the is¬sue at hand. Its sarcasm and bit¬terness are, I think, justified bythe smug and unyielding attitudeof the Administration. Any illog¬icality it presented, however, ismore than topped by Miss Jones’argument. Clearly, every point thatshe makes presumes the thesis thatshe is opposing, “that the primarypurpose of the University in erect¬ing residences for students wTas to“prevent sexual intimacy.” “Whatelse is her “criminal attack?” Fur¬thermore she upholds, with pseudo-psychological reasoning, this goal,which could conceivably be a validone. Since, the University is “inthe business of selling educationvia classroom instruction primarily(as a newspaper is in the positionof selling news), the Universityhas to make sure its kids get upin time for class (why not “lights-out” time and quiet hours?), Whileproviding them a place to be aloneto release their adolescent sexual¬ity, which is naturally “narcissis¬tic” and masturbatory.”Clearly also, the previously“neurotic behavior” of “illicit sex¬ual intercourse” becomes healthywhen past adolescence, the timeof guilt, i.e., in the state of gracethat ensues with the signing ofcertain papers. Since the “Commu¬nity” has changed from the ruralstate of the Hutchins years (auto¬mobiles are here, like the town- houses) and since the “value of acollege education” has changed andcan be more scientifically meas¬ured in terms of the American dol¬lar, best the University assume the“Master role” for its undergrad¬uate students, if it wants to haveany.The most powerful reason thatI can imagine for convincing oneof the inadequacy of the Hutchins“philosophy” would be its effectin producing thinkers capable ofsuch shoddy newspaper reasoning,which they justify by their exper¬tise in their “field. . . .”TONI ROBINSONSanders’ argumentsare termed idiotic and extremely complicated.Viewed in this light, Mr. Sanders’explanation seems paranoid. Idon’t think that the administrationreally cares that much about any¬body’s virtue. And even if it doesseek to prevent the practice ofsex, it must be enlightened enoughto realize that the “hours method”is of very doubtful efficacy. . . ,One more thought. I wish thatthe administration would allow Mr.Sanders to practice sex more free¬ly. He might end up a parentand learn a little responsibility.W. HALAMATO THE EDITOR:Upon reading Mr. Sanders*“Gadfly” on women’s hours, I feelconstrained to reply to this sheeridiocy. But before any furtherparanoid notions are started, allowme to state my bias on the mat¬ter. I am no great believer inwomen's hours, especially as theystand now, and I think that theresidence requirement borders onthe absurd. However, to look onthese as a sinister conspiracy bythe administration to propogatevirginity, virtue, and the “Ameri¬can Way of Life” is utterly pre¬posterous. No doubt the adminis¬tration imposes hours on womenfor a purpose, or I should say forpurposes. Many of these purposesare probably at best poor ration¬alizations. Foremost may well bethe desire of the administration toserve an “in loco parentis” func¬tion—making certain that the littlegirls get a good night’s sleep andthat they exercise some restrainton their social lives. But, this“social restraint” encompassesmore than sex.I thought that when people be¬came educated they ceased to lookat the world in terms of black andwhite, in terms of sinister con¬spiracies and came to realize thatcasual relationships in the be¬havior of administrators are plural Calls Gadfly InsultingThe AnnualPlayboy PartyatBeta Theta Pi5737 University Ave.SAT. APRIL 27,AT 9 P.M.Music By Ken PierceAdmission $2.00 per coupleRefreshments will beavailable HOBBY HOUSERESTAURANTOpen Dawn to DawnBREAKFASTLUNCH DINNERSNACKS1342 E. 53rd St. TO THE EDITOR:. . . The April 19 Gadfly was agross insult to the students of thisUniversity in three respects, eachof which points to the inability ofthe Maroon staff to use the barestamount of intelligence or judg¬ment of which it so overtly boasts.First of all, no intelligent stu¬dent (which the Maroon claimsthat we are) can seriously readan accusation so completely lack¬ing foundation and discretion with¬out feeling that he is the subjectof some deliberate prank. It isjust too inane to take seriously.Secondly, the subject itself, withor without justification, is notsomething which can be treatedin such an off-the-cuff mannerwithout being vulgar or offen¬sive. Of course, Mr. Sanders wasobviously not offended by whathe wrote nor was the editorialboard of the Maroon, which sup¬posedly approves the articles towhich its reading public is ex¬posed, but the ymight have is¬sued the article in the form of anintra-staff memo rather than tothe unenlightened and prudishmasses of the outside world.The third insult is directly feltby the U of C women themselves.Any girl who desires a sexual re¬lationship and cannot facilitateits operation between 8:00 a.m.and midnight on any day of theweek is not intelligent enough tobe at large in society, let aloneon this campus. . . .WILLIAM SrADY3 JEWISH CULTURAL SUMMER PROGRAMSFOR COLLEGE STUDENTS OFFERED BY THE STUDENT ZIONIST ORGANIZATIONRate:$635.00*1- SUMMER-IN-KIBBUTZTen Week work program on a Kibbutz. See Israel2. ISRAEL SUMMER INSTITUTE7 weeks of Fields trips — Seminars — Kibbutz life. Rate:$895.00*COLLEGE HEBREW ULPAN in United States, team Conver¬sational Hebrew in 1 Summer. An accredited Intensiveprogram for advanced & beginner students.Program given at South Branch, N.J. Rate:$295.00*/nc/udes Round Trip flight from New YorkClip & Mail to Student Zionist Organisation Regional Representative»A.-Ncw England Philip Horn — 17 Commonwealth Ave. — Boston. - Mass.Phone - CO 7-3600B.-Mid-Atlantic Rabbi S. Goldstein - 515 Park Ave. - New York 17, N.Y.& N.Y.C. Phone PL 2-1234C.-Canada Saul Panofsky - 2025 University St. — Montreal, QuebecPhone VI 4-2831D.-Midwest Reuben Surkis - Rm. 1704, 220 South State St. - Chicago, III.Phone WA 2-9365C.-West Robert Keller - 590 North Vermont - Los Angeles, Calif,Phone WO 2-2181I am interested in Prograr.. 1. ( ), 2. ( ), 3. ( )NAME Age SchoolADDRESS : Lowrey corrects errorTO THE EDITOR:Some of my colleagues have sug¬gested that I write you, since therewas a slight error in the story youran on a paper I read before theCommittee on Social Thought lastWednesday, entitled “Faulkner’sView of Man.” Under most circum¬stances I should be loathe to cor¬rect such a minor point, but in thiscommunity of scholars, where ac¬curacy is so highly regarded, Ifeel it my duty to set the recordstraight.Your reporter referred to mymention of a novel by M. Jean-Paul Sartre, An Exploratory Book,“written,” he says “in 1929.” Asmost of your readers know, thisimportant work was produced byM. Sartre in 1829, shortly beforethe author was implicated in thescandals of “the Hundred Days.”And, as a matter of fact, I didnot mention it in my paper. I sus¬pect your reporter mistook myreference to Faulkner’s importantnovel, Sartor Resartus, which waspublished in 1929, and which I didmention. As you know, that noveldeals with the lives of variousmembers of the Sartoris family,who lived in England at about thesame time M. Sartre was workingon the continent, and that mayaccount for your reporter’s mis¬takenly setting down the title of awork so well known to all studentsof the novel.While there were several otherminor errors in your account, Ifeel this is the on’y one whichneeds to be brought to the atten¬tion of your readers. I am per¬suaded that my small cavil will inno way reflect upon the .generallyadmirable reporting in The Ma¬roon; at least I hope it will not,for I am well aware of the highstandards of accuracy which youso constantly maintain.P. H. LOWREYAssociate ProfesscCAGO MAROON • April 24, 1963Faiths mutually complementary(Continued from page 1, Column 1)His tradition tells him that thisagony of the Jew has been super¬fluous for two millenia. It is onlya mark of Jewish pride and stub¬bornness. The stubborn tenacity ofthe Jew is not a mark of hisfaithfulness, but of his blindness.Such is the shape of our dif¬ference.“Christians have begun to sensethat this age-old rationale aboutthe fate and meaning of Israelmakes anti-Semitism inevitable.They seldom spell it out aloudtoday, for they are deeply trou¬bled and penitent about the hor¬rible human results it helped toproduce. They tone it down whereit comes to the surface liturgi¬cal ly.“This is all very well, as far asit goes. But it fails to come togrips with the very real fact ofJudaism as a living faith today:The mystery of Israel and theembarrassment of the WarsawGhetto and of the Return remain.The Christian is confronted withthe challenge: What do you thinkof the Jew? Can you acknowledgethe enduring validity of his claimto a divine vocation, not in yourcovenant, but in his? Can a Chris¬tian acknowledge that the missionof Israel did not end when his ownmission began?”Rylaarsdam argued that thereis some evidence that this sort ofreconsideration is going on inmany Christian circles. This is es¬pecially evident, he said, in the work of Reinhold Niebuhr. In aninimitably pragmatic, Americanway, Rei.rhold Niebuhr stumbledupon the discovery that our twocovenants are mutually supportive.To the dismay of many Christians,he stands for the view that in ourinter-faith relations we must as¬sume and clarify this mutuallycomplimentary role. If God’s cove¬nant with Israel is indeed an en¬during one, all attempts to put inout of business by missions, how¬ever well-intentioned, contradictGod’s purpose.By way of summing up, Rylaars¬dam noted that both Judaism andChristianity are historical faiths.“For both the decisive self-dis¬closure of God occurs in an objec¬tive historical event that involvesthe complex and interrelated proc¬ess of nature and of human soci¬ety. Revelation is something thathappens. It is a redemptive eventwhich evokes the confession thatGod has set man free.”However, for the Christian, JesusChrist is the Elect One, God’schosen means, as Israel is forthe Jew. “For the Jew Israel’sperduration in time is the proof ofthis Election. But in Christianfaith, the Elect One dies; more¬over, his choice is confirmed andthe victory of God is won preciselythrough the fact of his death. This,for the Jew, is the offense of theCross.“For the Jew, this Christian an¬nouncement of Fulfillment seems unrealistic. This is to be expected.For the Jew, history and the worldare unredeemed because they donot embody God’s rule of justice.This is true; the Christian mustadmit it. He must agree with theJew that the world does not em¬body the Redemption God has won,and he may add that it neverwill.”According to Rylaarsdam, “theagony of the Jew in history, bear¬ing witness to his faith that this isGod’s world and seeking to em¬body God’s righteousness in humanforms, and the agony of the Cross,which is the ‘sign’ of the end ofhistory and of God’s final triumphover its sin, are inseparable. Theinseparability of this double agony,and with it the validity of the wit¬ness of Israel, endures as long astime.“The popular Christian notionthat Jesus was a faithful substitutefor an Israel that was untrue toher vocation is not taught in theNew Testament. God has not re¬jected his people nor deprived Itof her mission. The action of Godin history, which is expressed byIsrael’s Election and witness andwhich the Christian says points tothe Cross, uses all time and allhistory.“Israel is the preparation forChrist in every century, and toquote St. Paul, ‘remember, it isnot you that support the root, butthe root that supports you.’ ” Announce unconfirmedsale of land to YWCAConstruction plans for anew YWCA at 6220 S. Drexel,were announced Sunday byMrs. Lois Lowe, Chairman ofthe South Side Building Commit¬tee. Mrs. Lowe said that the con¬tract for the purchase of the landfrom the University was signedlast week.Mrs. Lowe announced the pur¬chase yesterday at the annualFashion Show and Tea given bythe Woodlawn YWCA at Interna¬tional House.Winston E. Kennedy, managerof UC’s Community Real EstateOffice commented. “The announce¬ment is premature. Nothing for-50 errors in gomesIntra-mural softball saw an esti¬mated 50 errors in yesterday’s fri¬gid play, Shorey N. edged East II,26-21, in the closest contest of theafternoon.In other games Henderson N.toppled East IV, 27-19, whileHitchcock took 7090 Computer, 21-13. Robber Barons and Phi Siwalloped the Underdogs and Al¬pha Delta respectively, 32-2 and20-2. mal has been done, although therehas been talk about this.”This buiding is the first to bebuilt by the YWCA itself. (Otherswere built privately and then do¬nated.) Erection of the newYWCA will begin in December of19o4 according to Mrs. Lowe-Mrs. George W. Beadle receivedan award as a “Woman of Dis¬tinction” in Journalism at the“tea.” Also among the recipientsof the award was Mrs. Leon Des-pres for her work in CommunityRelations.30 students picketAbout 30 UC students par¬ticipated in a picket of Wool-worth’s department store at211 South State Saturday.The picket was sponsored byUC CORE along with several otherorganizations to protest the segre¬gation policies of the BirminghamAlabama Wolworth’s. The nationalmanagement could easily put anend to the segregationist policiesin individual stores, stated UCCORE chairman Bruce Rappaport.Cohen: New approach needed(Continued from page 1, Column 3)comes again and with his comingthere is the true and consummateEnd, and Israel refuses again, thensurely Israel is condemned. Butthis judgment is to God alone,neither to us nor to the Paul ofThe letter to the Romans.“The requirements of Paulineeschatology are that the Jew is tobecome a chimera, a shadow crea¬ture enduring a shadow history.If the Jew endures beyond thefulfillment of his own prophecy,then his perduration can only beconstrued as a divine witness ofjudgment. God preserves the Jewas threat to the Christian andtestimony to the bankruptcy ofthe Jew.”But such a view, according toCohen, has serious consequencesfor the manner in which Jew andChristian now must confront oneanother, no longer as dogmaticenemies, but as common seekersof the truth. “Jews and Christiansare still confronted by the factthat they are obliged both by his¬tory and by faith to live with oneanother in the same world. Howcan it be that God apparentlycherishes our disagreement, forwe would not have endured inseparate ness for two millenia hadit not been that he finds a use inthe dialectic of our encounter.”Cohen argued that the state ofdisagreement between Jew andChristian is extensive and pro¬found. They are far removed fromone another in point of faith andpractice and in their understand¬ing of divinity. Especially signifi¬cant is their marked disagreementon the basic nature of man.The Jews regard man as thecreature of his Creator, distantand near to him, neither evil be¬yond measure nor good beyondpossibility. Man is he to whom theTorah is given, he for whom theworld is sometimes thought to havebeen created. Such a view of manis, according to Cohen, in funda¬mental disagreement with the radi¬cal human predicament whichPaul describes.“Man had to be uncompromis¬ ingly in bondage to sin that theextraordinary challenge of theChrist might seem appropriate.Moreover, he had to pass througheons of regeneration before Christcould return in order that the factthat he did not return could besustained.“This anthropology of Christi¬anity is, I fear, appropriate to theperiod immediately succeeding thedeath of Jesus, but hopeless for ahumanity that has none of thechiliastic opportunities of the monk—a humanity that must, like theJew, maintain the whole of the re¬ligious life while earning bread,raising a family, and waiting forthe Messiah.”The result of all this is, accord¬ing to Cohen, a perplexity. “I havevirtually stated throughout that Ido not believe in the Judeo-C’hris-tian tradition. I regard this con¬ception as an biologizing of afundamental and irreconcilabledisagreement. There is a commonnexus: that we divide before thesame Lord. It is the sameness ofthe Lord which establishes ourconnection, but it is the breach ofour understanding of Him thatmakes all use of the significantworld ‘tradition’ hopelessly irrel¬evant.“There is indeed a ‘carrying-over’ from Jew to Christian—inthat sense there is a Judeo-Ghris-tian tradition, a tradition deter¬mined by your dependence uponus for your past. But this hyphen¬ated tradition is not reversible.There is no ‘Christo-Jewish’ tradi¬tion.”In conclusion, Cohen argued thatthe Christian is for the Jew avisible testimony to his messianicvocation. The presence of theChristian is a reminder that hecan never be permitted to throwoff what only he, as a Jew, cando: to affirm that amid the cry ofall, there is still no peace and noperfection until Christian is re¬united with Israel.“We await patiently the returnof Christendom to the Synagogue,but we do so not with the trumpet of the missionary nor the timbrelof the tract. For it is a require¬ment that the only proselyte whocomes wholly within our gate beone who has learned of his ownto love and fear'God.“Can we be more than patientbefore the reunion? What morehas Israel to offer the world thanan eternal patience?” RENT-A-CAR*55C PER DAYPER MILEATOMIC CARRENTALS, INC.7057 Stony IslandMl 3-5155 1961 CORVETTE, fullyequipped convertible, 4 onthe floor. An $OAQf%amazing buy at "“wwSOUTH SIDE STUDEBAKER, Inc.46th & Cottage GroveBO 8-1111HUAC considers travel ban lawA former professor of po¬litical science at the Univer¬sity of California has beensubpoenaed to appear beforethe House Committee on Un-Amer¬ican Activities (HUAC).J. P. Morray, author of FromYalta to Disarmament and a bookon the Cuban revolution, will bequestioned regarding his recent two year stay in Cuba. The pre¬cise date for the open hearings hasnot yet been set.The hearings are related to abill introduced on April 11 byLouisiana Congressman EdwinWillis, a member of HUAC, thatwould give “the President . . .authority to control the travelabroad of US citizens in time ofwar or national emergency.” asidefromallthat!a musical satire in mandel hall at 8:30APRIL 26, 27, 2844th annual blackf riars showApril 24. 1963 • CHICAGO MAROON • 3Folksinging illegalPolice officers broke up animpromptu folk sing on theCharles River near Harvarduniversity recently with thedeclaration that singing and play¬ing musical instruments is ilegalon MDC land.A dozen musicians including con¬cert star Joan Baez, the CharlesRiver Valley Boys, and the JimKeveskin Jug Band had attracteda quiet crowd of some 150 sun-bathers when the officers drove up.An officer stated that accordingto regulations, “entertainment” onthe Charles’ bank is illegal withoutwritten permission from the policecaptain. “Sometimes tie grants it,sometimes he doesn’t. It dependson his mood.”The musicians, who had beenplaying sporadically for nearly twohours, packed their guitars andharmonicas and rambled off. Onesinger offered the parting com¬ment, “Well, folksinging is Com¬munistic, anyway.”Quote of the dayI think Mr. Rappaport is themost qualified candidate, if wewish to vote on qualifications alone.I don’t believe that that’s the is¬sue in tonight’s election.—Gerry MacBeath, speakingduring SG debate on the pres¬idency.Calendar of events P. S. Holder, Jr.St Mary's U.4?G. J. Tamalivich Ancil K. NanceWorcester Poly (Staff) Portland Stateyou win in LapGary L LewisU. of San Fran.N.T.G. Rosanla S.Kansas State John V. ErhartLoras CollegeJames W. ToddValparaiso U. (Staff) Byron D. GroffPenn StateW.T. OliverLafayette College D. B. MacRitchieU. of Michigan J. L. Millard, Jr. J. 0. Gallegos, IIIFt Hays State U. of New MexicoEdward R. Wassel Morris S. BoyerClarkson College * U. of Georgia .Did Justin C. BumsSt. Bonaventure U.America's hottest newsports convertible!Yale president Griswold diesof higher education, for he gavestrong and decisive leadership toA. Whitney Griswold, the six¬teenth president of Yale Univer¬sity, died of cancer Friday at hishome in New Haven, Connecticut.While president at Yale, Gris¬wold worked especially hard toimprove the undergraduate college.He succeeded in improving the sci¬ence training, both graduate andundergraduate, and also helped toinstitute new and better humani¬ties programs.In addition, he was firmly op¬posed to the National Defense Edu¬cation Act disclaimer affidavit andcampaigned vigorously for its re¬moval. Yale and UC were amongthe schools to rejoin the NDEAloan program this fall when the af¬fidavit wTas eliminated.UC President George Beadlestated that: A. Whitney Griswodwill be sorely missed in the World Yale University for more than adozen years and was respected andadmired by all who knew him. CANOE TRIPSLow cost adventure in the Quet-ico-Superior wilderness. Write:Bill Rom, CANOE COUNTRY OUT¬FITTERS, Ely 5. Minnesota.NEW ATHENEUM PAPERBACKSTHE OLD STONE AGE by Miles Burkitt *1.45COURTS ON TRIAL by Jerome Frank S1.95MORPHOGENESIS by John T. Bonner *1.65PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS flc NATURAL SCIENCE byHerman W ey| *1.65Classical Record Sale Continue*The University of Chicago Bookstore5802 Ellis Ave. S.G. CHARTER FLIGHTCHICAG0-L0ND0N Sept. 3-Sept. 26SEATS OPEN, EXT. 3272, 4-5 P.M.(David Nelson)'Tempest Winners... Lap 3!Lecture: “The Origin of Political His¬tory: Thucydides,’’ Leo Strauss, profes¬sor of political science, 4 p.m., SocialSciences 122.L*C CORE meeting, discussion ofState open-occupancy law. open-occu¬pancy petitions, civil rights confer¬ences, Ida Noyes. 7:30 pm.Elementary tutoring project meeting,Ida Noyes, 7:30 pm.Coffee Hour: Laura Godofsky. editorof the Maroon, discussing the functionof a campus newspaper, 7 :30, ThompsonHouse, Pierce Tower.Lecture: "The Dynamic of Science andthe New Content of Politics," EugeneRabinowitch, editor of the Bulletin ofAtomic Scientists, and visitns: professorof social sciences, 8 pm. Social Sciences122.Lecture: “Hermeneutics and ExternalCriticism of Religion." Paul Ricoeur,professor of metaphysics at the Sor-bonne, 8 p.m.. Breasted Hall (DivinitySchool).ClassifiedFOR RENT, APTS., ROOMS, ETC.JUNE 20-Sept. 3—5-rm. home on Mich,dunes; private beach; l1, hours fromUniv. Call AL 1-3171 week nights.Rm. for man in pvt. home. Phone,linens. $30 mo. MU 4-5076.3 FEMALE students desire fourth toshare 7-room apt. FA 4-7838.LOST AND FOUNDFOUND: Ladies' black watch in frontof ad. bldg. Call 667-7749 after 5 p.m.LOST, small grey striped cat wearingblack collar with name "Joe.” CallMI 3-0800, ext. 2333.FOR SALEMust sell 7,000 books and periodicals inItalian, Latin, Greek. French and Ger¬man from 16th to 19th century, in thefields of humanities, literature, medi¬cine, law, philosophy and all fields.Archaeological pieces from 2nd centuryB.C. from *1.50 up. Oil paintings andlithographs, old stamped post cards andletters. Open 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. 2915 W.Cermak Rd. FR 6-6992 or 247-1264.PERSONALSAPRIL is the month of the rebirth ofspring. Allow your body and spirit toawaken at the Playboy Party, BetaTheta Pi, April 27.To place a classified ad. call ext. 3265(MI 3-0800). Special student, faculty andUniversity staff rates.SG short flight $320. Call 3272 between5 and 6, Monday through Thursday.TO SUBLEASE^-4 large rooms, nearcampus. Call WA 4-2753.Wednesday, Thursday and FridayStudentTHE LAST STRAWIMPOUNDED iSM^bodgeTi 1962 plates).Yours for *35, *10 towing charge and* for 1963 license. MI 3-2563, after 5p.m, for dramatic details. IMPORTANT! If you hold any of the 20 winning num¬bers, claim your Pontiac Tempest LeMans Convertiblein accordance with the rules on the reverse of yourlicense plate. Girls! You may choose instead a thrill¬ing expense-paid 2-week Holiday in Europe—fortwo! Plus $500 in cash!All claims for Tempests and Consolation Prizesmust be sent via registered mail, postmarkedby April 27, 1963 and received by the judgesno later than April 29, 1963.If you hold a Consolation Prize number, you win a 4-speed Portable Hi-Fi Stereo Set, “The Waltz” by RCAVictor. Or, you may still win a Tempest! (See officialclaiming rules on reverse of your license plate, and ob¬serve claiming dates given above.) 1. D3288722. B5520833. B6311554. D1481385. C591755 6. A8184717. C1753808. A1314839. C70247210. A909791 11. C19181912. A07860313. D21545214. A60915915. C613177 16. A11243317. A33747718. C46789319. B91149420. B482169CONSOLATION PRIZE NUMBERS!1. B3810312. A2601103. A6810374. B7465975. A491651 6. A1395647. 03730578. A7134539. 003140310. 8905589 11. C52724012. D79996613. B33547114. C03393515. 0757193 16. A23759417. A12758I18. B68622319. B52149220. A057S55 21. B4022II22. B79256123. B14535S24. 049291925. B707528**CC*?T «Get with the winners rOtACCOfar abend In smoking satisfaction ISEE THE PONTIAC TEMPEST AT YOUR NEARBY PONTIAC DEALERI