Board rates up, announce new dorm for womenThe establishment of a newwomen’s dormitory, the aban¬donment of plans for a stu¬dent-faculty housing unit, andan additional hike in board rateswere all announced recently byAssistant Dean of Students, JamesNewman.A former apartment-hotel at 5426Harper will be converted to a dor¬mitory for second, third, and fourthyear undergraduate women. Thisis meant as a replacement for theC-group which will be used exclu¬sively as office space starting nextfall.5426 Harper contains 73 singlerooms with private bath whichwill be completely refurnished.There are no kitchen facilitieswithin the individual rooms, butcommon cooking and dining facili¬ties, similar to those in C group,will be provided on the first floor.The rental rate will be announcedlater this week.The only other important changein university housing is that Salis¬bury House will be transfered fromundergraduate to law school hous¬ing. Thus next academic year,undergraduates will live in onlyfour of the Burton-Judson Courtshouses, Chamberlin, Dodd, Mead,and Vincent. Along with Salisbury,law students will use Linn andMathews Houses, and CoulterHouse will be a general graduatedormitory.Newman said the reason for theabandonment of plans to establisha student-faculty dormitory wasthat the University already hassufficient dormitory space to meetnext year’s needs, and thus theaddition of two to three hundredmore spaces would be financiallyuntenable. 'Newman explained that the de¬mand for dormitory space arisingfrom the closing of C-group willbe entirely met by 5426 Harper.He noted that the housing officehad committed itself to using 5426Harper before the discussion onstudent-faculty housing began. (Thestudent committee interested instudent-faculty . housing decidedthat 5426 Harper was unfit for suchpurposes early this year.)Dormitory board contract ratesin Burton-Judson will be increasedto $195 per quarter. (B-J has a 20meal contract) This represents a$20 increase over the current rate.Earlier this year, the Universityhad announced a $10 increase inthe board rate. This second $10hike will be earmarked for the pur¬chase of raw food, according toNewman. He expressed hopes thatthis increase would help to im¬prove menus.Pierce Tower will definitely havea 13-meal contract but the exactrate will not be announced untillater this week.Room rates in conventional dor¬mitories will increase $15 perquarter, as announced two monthsago. The new rates will be: $155.50for singles in Pierce and Burton- Judson and $145.50 for doubles.Doubles in East House will rentfor $145 and singles for $155. Ratesin North and West Houses will be$5 lower than those in East be¬cause they do not receive maidservice.Rents in all dormitories that rentmonthly will be increased by $10monthly with the exception ofLaughlin Hall, 5519 Blackstone,where rates will increase by $5per month.The raise in rates will be takeninto consideration in determing thesize of scholarship awards, statedDean of Students, Warner Wick.The assumed budget for studentsused in determining scholarshipawards will increase by $100,which is “more than enough” tocover the raise in rates, said Wick.Currently, it is assumed that stu¬dents living in dormitories willhave a budget of about $2,900 peryear. Next year, the budget thatwill be assumed is $3000.Wick also stated that financialawards to students not living inthe dormitory will be consideredon a slightly different basis thanfor students in the dormitory. Theindividual’s budget will be revieweddepending on how much the stu¬dent expects to spend for an apart¬ment. If students save money bymoving out of the dormitory, thiswill be considered in determiningthe amount of financial aid. Thus,the cost to the student to live inan apartment should come morein line with that of students inthe dorms. In view of this changein scholarship policy, financial ne¬cessity will not be consideredsufficient grounds for grantingpetitions to scholarship studentswho want to live outside the dormsnext year.Newman emphasized that 5426Harper should be “viewed as atemporary replacement for the C-Group to be used until we canfind a facility closer to campus.”However, he indicated that itwould remain a permanent partof the housing system. It willprobably become a dormitory forgraduate men after a more suit¬able housing unit for undergradu¬ate women is found. (Observershave pointed out that 5426 Harperis 1.2 miles from Cobb Hall.)In explaining his action on theproposed student-faculty housingunit, Newman explained that thetrend toward more undergraduatesliving in University housing is lev¬eling off. He stated that prior to1957 fewer than one-third of under¬graduates lived on campus. Eachyear since 1957, a greater per¬centage of graduates have livedin University housing. Last yearover 60% of college students livedin dormitories and almost 30%either commuted or lived in fra¬ternity houses leaving only 10%of the undergraduate student bodyliving in apartments in Hyde Park.Newman expects the number ofstudents living in the Universityhousing system to decrease slight¬ly next year because of increase in rates, the closing of C-Group,and the return of required boardcontracts to pierce Tower. The de¬mand for housing is expected tostay fairly constant over the nextfew years, although Newman in¬dicated that there is a possibilitythat the demand for graduate dor¬mitory space will increase.Gary Feldman, a student whohas been negotiating with the ad¬ministration on student - facultyhousing, stated that he is disap¬pointed in the outcome of the ne¬gotiations but added “this is notto say that the effort that studentsand faculty members have madethis year to establish a student-faculty housing unit has beenwasted.“The two-fold problem we wereinterested in, poor student hous¬ing and insufficient student-facultycommunication, has been discussedat length with and within the ad¬ ministration, and students and fac¬ulty members have become moreaware of this problem.“It is now clear that the estab¬lishment of a full scale graduate-undergraduate-faculty housing unit,such as the Wednesday Night Clubconceived at the beginning of thisyear, is financially impossible forthe next five years. However, theadministration has expressed aninterest in experimentation withinthe buildings which are alreadyused by the dormitory system.“But students must rememberthat the housing office, as anybureaucracy, is quite conservativeand unimaginative. Any improve¬ments in' housing will originatewith students and will be imple¬mented only through their activeconcern.”Feldman suggested that theStudent Government organized amore active housing committee next year composed of studentswho seek basic improvements inthe dormitory system.In addition to 5426 Harper, Northand West Houses and BlackstoneHall will serve as dormitories forundergraduate women. Rent atBlackstone will be $67.50 per monthfor a double and $82.50 per monthfor a single.The sole dormitory for graduatewomen is at 5518-26 Ellis. Ratesthere next year will be $60 permonth for a double and $85 permonth for a single.5400 Greenwood will continue tohouse both graduate and under¬graduate men and rents there willrange from $53 to $74 per month.Rents at the dormitories forgraduate men are as follows: Snell,$135.50 per quarter; Hitchcock,$120.50 to $150.50 per quarter; andLaughlin Hall, $54.50 per month.Vol. 71 — No. 88 University of Chicago, Tuesday, April 9, 1963 -**ijf* 31No change for women's hoursAron to speak todayRaymond Aron, notedFrench political commentator,will make three public appear¬ances on campus this week.The Committee on Social Thoughthas announced that Prof. Aron willgive a seminar on Thursday, April11, from 3:30 to 5 pm in Cobb 101.The program’s subject will be “Isthe Atlantic Alliance Compatiblewith the Realities of the AtomicAge?”The seminar is in addition totwo public speeches Aron will giveearlier in the week. Today at 4pm in Mandel Hall, he will speakon “Ideals and Realities in theAtlantic Community.” He will ap¬praise the potentialities and diffi¬culties of NATO programs.Aron’s major speech will be de¬livered tomorrow at 8 pm in theLaw School Auditorium. It istitled, “Theory of International Re¬lations in the Atomic Age.” Thespeech, according to C. H. Prit¬chett, chairman of the PoliticalScience Department, which ar¬ranged the talk, will go into theproblems of international sover¬eignty and defense in an age ofnuclear weapons. In addition to the three publictalks, Aron will meet privatelywith students in the New Nationsprogram, the Committee on SocialThought, and the Social ScienceDivision.Aron is coming to Chicago di¬rectly from Paris, and will gofrom here to the Univ. of Californiaat Berkeley for two weeks ofspeeches. He comes here under thePaul Vincent Harper VisitingScholar program, under the au¬spices of the Political Science de¬partment.Chairman Pritchett said thatAron is regarded as “the WalterLippman of France.” He continued,“He is an outstanding politicalcommentator, and knows both Eu¬rope and the U.S. well, as he hasmany close personal contacts withpeople in American government.”Aron is both professor of sociol¬ogy at the University of Paris andwriter for Le Figaro, a Paris daily.He has written extensively on so¬cial and political conditions inFrance and Germany, as well ason the problems of mankind inthe atomic age. The University has decidednot to make any major changein the system of women’shours, announced AssistantDean of Students, James E. New¬man yesterday.University officials had beendiscussing the problem of women’shours regulations for the pastseveral weeks after student govern¬ment and several house councilshad presented the administrationwith resolutions asking the hourssystem be changed.Several house councils had in¬dicated that they felt hours regula¬tions should be dropped for stu¬dents upon receiving parental per¬mission.According to Newman, the prob¬lem was discussed with membersof the housing staff in the variousdormitories, and presidents ofhouse councils, and various mem¬bers of the administration. Afterreview, it was decided to keep thesystem as it is, said Newman.Under the current system,women who have been at UC areallowed to stay out after midnightfor a total of four hours eachweek, except that they may neverstay out later than 3 am. Theyare otherwise due in at midnight.The text of Newman’s statementis as follows:“W h e t h e r a universityshould take an interest in theliving arrangements and thecomings and goings of itsminor students is not a questionthat merits debate. The aims ofeducation have always included theforms of excellence that find ex¬pression in a man’s character andstandards of choice as well asthose that are displayed in his hab¬its of thought and judgment. Col¬leges and universities should beprimarily concerned with the “in¬tellectual virtues” because thereare no other institutions equippedto foster them, in contrast to themany that help shape character.But since a college graduate willusually have grown from adoles¬cence to adulthood during the fifthof his life he has spent in college,his manner of living in those yearswill inevitably affect most aspectsof his development. To declare thatthe ability to live an orderly lifein a community of his peers is ofno importance to an educated manwould be absurd, and for a uni¬versity to show no concern for thatpart of education would be irre¬sponsible.‘‘The current issue about “wom¬en’s hours” falls within the scopeof this principle, as do other ques¬tions about a university’s right andduty to regulate what students do outside the classroom.“The kind and degree of regula¬tions may be expected to vary withcircumstances, and should be re¬viewed periodically. In general,rules that specify in detail whatone must do at what times areeducationally self-defeating. Theyfail to recognize that an ability toorder one’s life is acquired onlyby having opportunities to makechoices that may be mistaken, andby having to live with the conse¬quences. Sound rules will thereforeset limits within which a consider¬able range of choice is possible.For example, class attendance isnot required, but sufficient self-discipline to meet minimal acad¬emic standards by the end of eachquarter is a condition of proceed¬ing to the next. Similarly, currentrules allow women living in Uni¬versity residences to use, at theirdiscretion, a certain number ofhours after midnight each week,with a limit of 3 am on any onenight. Such a system is reasonable,and we see no reason to abolishit. To do so would mean either arigid curfew for all or an admis¬sion that a University address did not necessarily mean that a wom¬an “lived” there, but only that shecame in occasionally to pick upher mail.“In summary, after extendeddiscussions with representatives ofthe women’s House Councils andwith the staff of the women’s hous¬es, we have decided to make nobasic change in the present regula¬tions. No one has made a case thatthe system as such imposes hard¬ships; but modifications in detail,or in the administration of therules, are possible and may be de¬sirable. The specific proposal thatwomen be exempted from hoursregulations if they obtain a par¬ent’s approval seems both impi-ac-ticable and undesirable. It wouldmean unequal treatment for equals,which is unjust; and it would implythat the University makes its rulesprimarily to please parents, whichis untrue. The University legislatesfor its own community, in order toachieve its own educational ends.“This policy has been reviewedby all officers concerned and rep¬resents the considered view of theCollege and the Office of the Deanof Students.”April 8, 1963Abolition petition invalidThe Election and RulesCommittee (E&R) of StudentGovernment has ruled invalida petition proposing a consti¬tutional amendment abolishing stu¬dent government. The Proposedamendment was to read: “StudentGovernment, as defined in thisconstitution, shall cease to existon April 23, 1963.”E & R acted on Saturday after¬noon after it was discovered thatthe petition contained 38 invalidsignatures. E & R chairman DonCongdon revealed after the meet¬ing that the invalid signaturesrepresented fictitious personswhose names could not be foundin the registrar’s records. Congdonadded that the petition also con¬tained many apparent forgeries,including cases of duplicate, butdifferent, “signatures” reperesent-ing the same student.At Hie same meeting, E & Rvoted unanimously to place on theballot an amendment supportingresidential representation for col¬lege seats in the SG Assembly.The proposed amendment woulddivide the college into electorialunits consisting of each contiguousUniversity - controlled dormitorycomplex having at least 100 collegeresidents, residents of fraternityhouses, and all other non-dormitorystudents. Each electoral unit wouldelect a slate of representatives proportionate to the proportion ofcollege students living in the unit.No unit would have less than onerepresentative. Graduate represen¬tation would continue as under thecurrent system.The proposed amendment wasjointly sponsored by GNOSIS andthe Liberal Party, in accordancewith their election platforms. Theirpetition was signed by 467 stu¬dents, 105 mor»than the necessaryquota of 6% (362 students) pro¬vided for in the constitution. Vot¬ing on the amendment will takeplace during the Spring NSA/SGelection, this Wednesday, Thurs¬day and Friday. Adoption of anamendment to the SG constitutionrequires a simple majority ofthose voting, provided the total(Continued on pape 4)Poll watchersAll students willing towatch ballot boxes thisweek for the Spring elec¬tions are urged to come toa meeting tonight in theEast Lounge of Ida Noyesat 7:00 for assignments andinstructions. Those unableto attend should call E &R chairman Don Congdonext. 3273 or 3274.Maroon endorses 14 candidates; lists 23 others as qualifiedIn the past year, we have re¬peatedly expressed our concern overthe apparent failure of SG to win thecampus’ general respect, interest, andparticipation in its activities. And, whilethis year's SG has probably been no worsethan any other, SG has hardly attained itsfull potential as the major student forceon this campus. It has failed to find, andimplement effective means of communicat¬ing with students, faculty, and administra¬tion. Although effective in many of its off-campus endeavors, it has failed to devoteadequate attention to some of the most im¬portant campus problems, including cur¬riculum revision and student-faculty rela¬tions. In short, SG this year has justplodded along as past student governmentshave—running services and acting off cam¬pus at the expense of forming an effectiveon-campus information and action program.The cure, however, for this situation doesnot lie. in restricting SG activities to thecampus as GNOSIS has suggested; ratherit lies in building up a better campus pro¬gram while maintaining off campus activ¬ities. There is no justification for the viewthat the student, by the act of matriculation,renounces his concerns and responsibilitiesas a citizen. But while SG must consideroff campus issues, its major emphasisshould be on campus.We found in the platforms of all threeparties many good suggestions for improv¬ing SG's campus program. Many concernsare shared by all three parties: in locoparentis, student-faculty and cooperativehousing, the University’s neighborhood poli¬cy, the tutoring project, cooperation withTWO, and expanded travel and book dis¬count services.In addition, there are several proposalswhich do not appear in all three platformsbut on which we feel all parties could worktogether. These include formation of a Chi¬cago area council, investigation of exor¬bitant dormitory and food prices, curricu¬lum discussions, student advisors, seminars,a disarmament conference, SG-Soc II lec¬tures, and neighborhood discounts for stu¬dents.We think the time has come for all ourcampus parties to realize that Student Gov¬ernment and its activities are of far moreimportance than furthering individual partygoals. We are quite fed up with constantparty bickering and jealousies which pre¬vent many worthwhile projects from beingrealized and many interested persons fromworking for SG.We think that the people we have en¬dorsed all share a dislike for this type ofpetty bickering which tends to impede theprogress of student government. It isprimarily upon our hopes of getting manyof the above projects effectively carriedout that we have made our choices.In addition, we have given great con¬sideration to candidates who have demon¬strated a concern about the failure of themany students not sitting in the Assemblyor directly involved in the political hagglingof SG to work on projects or take an in¬terest in resolutions and programs. Wethink that the campus would be far morefavorably disposed to the progressive andbroad program of SG if it were just madeto feel more a part of it. For this reason,we have endorsed no one who did not seemquite concerned about the problems ofbringing SG into closer contact with thecampus at large; we have not endorsedanyone who feels that student government’spresent relationship with the campus issatisfactory.Since we are particularly concerned withthe inability of student government to workeffectively with the administration, we haveendorsed only those individuals who wefeel would improve rather than harm therelationship between students and’ the ad¬ministration.And finally, in choosing students for en¬dorsement, we have favored few who havenot been on campus for more than oneyear. Although we found a good number offirst year students who seemed to havethe potential of working successfully in SG,we felt most needed one more year ofworking in the organization, serving thecampus, and learning about its problems.Now, before listing our choices, we wouldlike to explain the system we have used.We have divided the candidates we favorinto two groups: those we endorse, andthose we consider “qualified.” Those wehave endorsed are students we feel willmake outstanding contributions in the com¬ing year to the improvement of StudentGovernment, especially in the areas inwhich we have indicated most concern.The candidates we have merely listed asqualified, on the other hand, are studentseither of great ability or potential but whomwe cannot wholeheartedly endorse becauseof disagreement with their basic attitudesor ideas, concern about their lack of ex¬perience, or doubt as to the value of theirpotential or past contributions. We do, how¬ever, think that these “qualified” persons can make a much greater contribution tothe campus than the rest of the candidates.Our judgments are based primarily oninterviews conducted by Maroon editorsthis weekend with about 85% of the Collegecandidates and 35% of the graduates run¬ning for contested seats. Only students whowere interviewed were considered for en¬dorsements; we assumed that the few un¬dergraduate and many graduate studentswho did not appear at the Maroon officefor interviews are not very interested inparticipating SG this year.EndorsedRobert Axelrod (Liberal Party)—Has beenworking towards improving SG since hiselection as an independent from the Collegelast spring. Has since organized the liberalparty, but is not so wrapped up in party poli¬tics that he forgets the issues. Anxious tobring student body closer to Student Gov¬ernment.Barbara Caress (POLIT)—She has beenworking on student government since therecall. Seems particularly concerned withimproving student-faculty-administration re¬lations. Would also like to encourage morestudent contact with SG.Sue Goldberg (POLIT)—Dissatisfied withthe student government’s method of “nego¬tiating” with the administration, andwould like to replace “negotiations” withbetter communication. Would also like toinvolve more people in SG. Has been incontact with student government. Thirdyear student.Eugene Groves (GNOSIS)—A second yearstudent with little experience in SG be3rondattending meetings, most concerned withimproving SG’s campus and neighborhoodprograms. We endorse him because ol hisgood and realistic ideas on improving rela¬tions between SG and the rest of the cam¬pus, particularly on contacting faculty mem¬bers and enlisting their cooperation. We alsowould like to see him in SG to work withthe NSA committee, as he has many goodideas here, but lacks the necessary experi¬ence to be a member of UC’s delegation.Tom Heagy (GNOSIS)—A competent first-year student who has demonstrated a sin¬cere interest in working for and helping toimprove SG. Has served on SG committeesand suggested the establishment of the Chi¬cago Area Council.Jerry Hyman (GNOSIS)—A capable andconcerned second-year student; leader ofGNOSIS; extremely interested, and withthe exception of some confusion on neigh¬borhood issues, well informed and enthusi¬astic; has done some work for SG whenasked and. has attended many meetings;interested in working on new campus proj¬ects and in spreading student interest andparticipation in projects.Dick Jacobson (POLIT)—a third yearstudent with lots of experience; eventhough he has lost for IRP twice and beenrecalled once, he has a very positive atti¬tude towards SG, and is interested in get¬ting things done. He has been chairman ofthe Campus Action Committee and hasworked on setting up the Soc. II lectures;he would give an SG newsletter top priorityfor next year.Pamela Proeuniar (POLIT)—a third yearstudent who has been responsible for theorganization and execution of most of SG’scampus projects as well as the tutoringprogram; by not recalling her last Janu¬ary, the campus seems to have demon¬strated its awareness of her work; she hasmany good ideas for bringing the students into better contact with SG and for newprojects.Pete Rabinowitz (POLIT)—was electedto SG last spring, and served as treasureruntil the recall. (Feels he would not votethe same way on the recall knowing thecampus’ disagreement with the stand.)Recognizes the gap in SG-student bodyrelations, and has several ideas for im¬proving the communication.Art Robins (Liberal Party)—a first-yearstudent who has been working with SG’sCommunity Relations Committee andCORE; he is interested in working onneighborhood and academic freedom proj¬ects; he seems very informed, and has avery positive attitude towards SG; he hasthe same views as most POLIT candidates,but seems much more interested in bring¬ing SG to the students and making it amore responsive group; we think he'll getthings done.Richard Schmidt (POLIT)—one of themost able first year students to work withSG this year; he has been active on theCommunity Relations Committee, hasbrought new people to work on it; has goodideas, and is responsible.Joel Slmfro (POLIT)—serves as co editorof the NSA regional ^newsletter, has servedas a regional chairman for disarmament,worked on some of NSA’s non-conferenceactivities, and has attended last fall’s re¬gional. He is aware of the need for greaterstudent awareness, and has specific plansfor remedying this deficiency. He believesthat what goes on in between the con¬ferences is just as important as what goeson during the two week national session.Shufro is the only candidate we are en¬dorsing for NSA because he is the only onewho has show'n a great interest in involv¬ing the student body in the programs ofNSA. The candidates we have listed asqualilied, however, have all been to previ¬ous conferences and effectively representedUC at them, but have failed to followthrough on the campus between meetings.We bel'eve that UC’s NSA delegates can domore on campus than run book or petitiondrives to demonstrate that they are imple¬menting NSA’s policies. Until they do more,they will merely be listed as qualified.GNOSIS had two candidates, EugeneGroves and Don Congdon, with interestingideas of how they would represent UC at aCongress and follow up. We cannot evenlist them as qualified, however, until theyhave shown more interest by attendingsome meetings as observers and learningmore about the workings of NSA.Steve Boyan (POLIT)—One of the fewgraduate students who does anything in SG;he served as chairman of CORSO this year,and was active both in his party and onthe SG Executive Committee; a student inthe division of social sciences.Don Congdon (GNOSIS) — Despite hisinitial failure to post election deadlines ontime, he has given a lot of time and effortto running this year’s elections, and hasmany new ideas on how SG should be run,and the place of graduate students in SG.For improving SG-administration comunica-tion, he suggests bringing administratorsto SG meetings, sending SG minutes tofaculty and administrators and posting themon campus; and improving on consultantboards. He would, work towards obtaininga student voice in university policy-making;he has had much SG experience while anundergraduate at Oberlin. ' QualifiedHarris Jaffe,' a third year student, hasbeen working hard all year for POLIT andfor SG. He has served as chairman of theyear’s most active consultant board, butagain has not fulfilled the obligations of a'SG representative to get more grass rootssupport for his activities.Arthur Kaufman - (POLIT) a responsi¬ble second-year student who has been activein the Woodlawn tutoring project. Has goodideas about how to improve SG but doesnot realistically evaluate the current sta¬tus of the government.Russell Kay (POLIT) - an experienced,competent and hard working individualwho has served in the last two Assemblies.He does not fully recognize the failure of SGin dealing with the Administration.Judy Magidson (Independent) - athoughtful and open-minded first-year stu¬dent running as an independent because shefeels she can best work without involvingherself in inter-party quarrels; we do notendorse her because she is not outstandingeither in her knowledge, her ideas, or herexperience, but we think she is qualifiedbecause she seems to have become aware ofproblems facing SG in the difficulties shehad running the housing consultant boardthis year and seems genuinely concernedabout resolving them.Joan Mahoney (POLIT) - has served asthe SG secretary, worked on the tutoringproject, is currently running one of theflights, and will continue to work, even ifnot elected. We do not endorse her eventhough she is qualified because she lacksideas for improving the relationship be¬tween government and the administration,and for drawing more students into SG.E. Stevens Meckstroth (Liberal Party) -a third year student whose interest is quiteimpressive and admittedly quite recent.He attended last weekend’s in loco parentisseminar and consequently became quite in¬terested in developing SG as an organi¬zation that can create a student body thatis better-informed. W’e cannot endorse himbecause of his total lack of experience, butlook forward to seeing him do the mosttowards helping establish the seminars anddisarmament conference his party proposed.We also think his enthusiasm will provecontagious, and that when coupled withhis interest in doing publicity work, willdo a lot to aid SG.Terri Ray (POLIT) - Although she hashad much experience in student govern¬ment, and could contribute much to itsprojects we are not endorsing her becausewe feel her notion that the only w’ay any¬thing can be accomplished is through powermakes for rather difficult discussions withthe administration.Bruce Rappaport (POLIT) - while hedisplayed a greater understanding of SGand its activities both on and off campusthan almost any other candidate, we donot endorse him because we believed hisoVerly billigerent attitude towards the ad¬ministration is not conducive to improvedrelations; also had few ideas for increas¬ing the communication between the studentbody and SG.Marty Reisberg (POLIT) - 3rd yearstudent who has worked with SG throughthe Reynolds Club Service Center, he isanxious to concentrate on student servicejnd stay out of campus political haggling, al¬though he strongly agrees with and sup¬ports POUT'S on and off-campus planks;we suspect that his time may be limited,however.Larry Robinson (Liberal Party)—A firstyear student with no experience in StudentGovernment. He has, however, been workingin his party and is extremely interested inediting a Student Government Newsletterand has good ideas for it.Alen Sussman (POLIT)—We agree withhis conception of responsibility, and believehe is sufficiently aware of the nature andthe problems of SG especially on off campusissues to make him a qualified candidate.He has not, however, done enough for oncampus activities even though he wouldwork if elected.Dick Richards (POLIT)—A 1st year stu¬dent in the School of Social Service Admini¬stration with no experience in SG; he is aninterested, intelligent student, concernedwith campus and neighborhood issues, inter¬ested in bringing SG in contact with hisschool, which has traditionally been apartfrom the rest of the campus; Richards hasbeen active in the SSA Club, and wants touse the SSA Newsletter to bring SG andother campus news back to the SSA.Henry Plaegstrom (GNOSIS—An interested student who has new ideas aboutincreasing graduate participation in SG;especially concerned about increasing inter1est and discussion of graduate curricula.Murray Schacher (POLIT)—One of thebetter informed graduate students who isrunning; he has worked in POLIT, SG, andNSA; we list him a qualified rather thanendorse him because he will probably notbe outstanding in his efforts towards bring*ing SG in better touch with the students inhis division.Maroon election selectionsEndorsed(The Maroon endorses the followingcandidates, all of whom stand to makeoutstanding contributions to the develop¬ment of Student Government in the com¬ing year. We wholeheartedly urge theirelection.) Qualified(The Maroon recognizes the abilitiesand potential of the following candidates,but, because of reservations about theirideas, experience, or their past or poten¬tial contributions, merely judges them tobe qualified.)ROBERT AXELROD (Liberal Party)BARBARA CARESS (POLIT)SUSAN GOLDBERG (POUT)EUGENE GROVES (GNOSIS)TOM HEAGY (GNOSIS)JERRY HYMAN (GNOSIS)PAMELA PROCUNIAR (POLIT)DICK JACOBSON (POLIT)PETER RABINOWITZ (POLIT)ART ROBINS (Liberal Party)RICHARD SCHMIDT (POLIT) CollegeHarris Jaffe (POLIT)Arthur Kaufman (POLIT)Russel Kay (POLIT)Judy Magidson (Independent)Joan Mahoney (POLIT)E. Steven Meckstroth( Liberal)Bruce Rappaport (POLIT)Terri Ray (POLIT)Marty Reisberg (POLIT)Larry Robinson (Liberal)Alan Sussman (POLIT)Graduate DivisionsEndorsements: Steve Boyan (POLIT); Don Conqdon (GNOSIS). Soc. Sci.Qualified: Murray Schacher *(P0L1T-Phy. Sci.); Henry Plaegstrom(GNOSIS—Hum.)National Student AssociationDelegates: No endorsements; qualified: Sally Cook, Pam Proeuniar,Bruce Rappaport, Terri Ray, Andy Stein, all POLIT.Alternate: Joel Shufro (POLIT) endorsed.Qualified: Barbara Caress, Richard Jacobson, Richard Schmidt, POLIT;Robert Axelrod, Steve Furstenburg, Liberal.Praises the performance of BachJohann Sebastian Bach: aname to which I have alwaysreacted with respect, awe,wonderment, but seldom withenthusiasm. The Saint MatthewPassion: a work which I have al¬ways considered one of the mighti¬est monuments of music, butthrough which I have never beenable to sit without the vague feel¬ing (always, of course, suppressed)that I was on the verge of beingbored stiff.Until Sunday afternoon, that is.For the performance of this workwhich was presented by the Rocke¬feller Chapel Choir and membersof the Chicago Symphony Orches¬tra under the direction of RichardVikstrom, was nothing less thana revelation.One can give numerous technicalreasons why this was one of themost satisfying musical events ofthe season. The orchestra was atits best (boasting some exquisiteoboe solos by Ray Still): Thechorus hasn’t been better all year:they ably reflected the many vary¬ing moods of the work, from theviolent outpouring “Ye lightnings,GRAND OPENINGSUCCESS SPECIALBRAND NEW1963V, LARK $1KC|C|99STANDARD ■ WWWFully factory equipped, 36 monthsto pay—no money down—4V,%bank rates.24 Month GuaranteeSOUTH SIDE STUDEBAKER, Inc.46th A Cottage Grove■O 8-1111 ye thunders” to the more quietand introspective passages such as“O sacred Head, now wounded.”The soloists, too, were betterthan they have often been in pastChapel concerts. Especially con¬vincing was Sherrill Milnes’s pene¬trating portrayal of Christ. JacksonSheats as the Evangelist sangwithout falling into the monotonythat so often plagues the part; hisfew shaky pitches and weak en¬trances can be excused becauseof the length of his role.Yet many performances of thePassion are technically adequatewithout being particularly interest¬ing. What made this one outstand¬ing?Primarily, it was the spirit ofthe performers. The singers, theconductor, and even the orchestra,were sincere: they seemed to be¬lieve in the panorama which theywere unfolding.What is more important, theywere able to communicate thisfeeling: for the first time in mylife I was able to experience thereligious as well as the “purelymusical” impact of the score.Somehow, I feel that it would bean injustice to the performers to finish with anything less than abroad sweeping conclusion. There¬fore, I will end with one of thosestatements from which it is im¬possible to recede when faced withhostile criticism: this was not onlythe best concert I have heard atRockefeller Chapel, but was alsothe best performance of the SaintMatthew Passion, I have everheard, on or off records.Pete RabinowitzParking spaces leftReserved parking spacesare still available for thisquarter in several lots oncampus, announced WilliamVan Cleve, parking committeechairman.Van Cleve said that spaces maybe reserved for $11 per quarter.Room is available at the LawSchool, the Kimbark lot facingJudd Hall, to the south of NewDorms, at Pierce Tower, and atthe 5555 Ellis area. Applicationsare available in Administration103, ext. 3407.PhotographyWhat a beautiful time to takepictures at less cost than youmay think. Inquire at ourPhotographic Department.The University ofChicago Bookstore5802 Ellis Ave. 1 the prime rib14 west randolphchicaqo, ill. dearborn 2-1112AtfentimtFraternities, women’s clubs, organizations, plan to haveyour next luncheon, dinner, or party at Chicago s newestand smartest supper club and restaurant.Serving complete banquet lunches from $2.45Serving complete banquet dinners from $3.25DINING — DANCING — ENTERTAINMENTfree lunch or dinner to interestedand accredited group representativeline ttt HUftfotttl B’plettteWherever you go you took better fit-ARROW-Here's where a button-down should button down Mr. "TVDISCOUNT RECORD MARTLISTEN... YOU JAZZ LOVERSIF ... You Haven’t Visited Our StoreWe Have Both Lost Money!HUNDREDS OF LP’SBy Getz, Mulligan, Canonball, Taylor, Lateef, Etc.Regular Price — $4.98 & $5.98 C A Qfi(Moho or Stereo) IMr. “T’s” Discount Record Mart(It’s Mr. •T’s” For Jazz LP’s)Corner 47th St. & Ingleside Ave. Ail Phones: 624-4666FREEH! Present This Ad and Receive $1.00 Cloth orBrush with LP Purchase!DR. A. ZIMBLER, OptometristIN THENEW HYDE PARK SHOPPING CENTER1510 E. 55th St. DO 3-7644EYE EXAMINATIONSPRESCRIPTIONS FILLED CONTACT LENSESNEWEST STYLING IN FRAMESSTUDENT DISCOUNTA new standard ofEconomy Class steamshiptravel to the OrientPlan now for your vacation cruise or post-graduatetrip to Hawaii, Japan, Hong Kong and the Philippines.You’ll get more for your money—more service, morefeatures, more fun —when you sail American Presi¬dent Lines Economy Class aboard the ss presidentsCleveland or WILSON. Economy Class accommoda¬tions have been completely redecorated, and re¬designed to include: swimming pool; air conditioningthroughout; 2- and 4-berth cabins with and withouttoilets, improved 6- and 8-berth cabins, and two dor¬mitories for men, with showers and toilets. Specialdinners and deck luncheons are regular EconomyClass features—as are talent shows, concerts,deck sports, movies and nightly dancing to theship’s orchestra. Tours, side trips and stopoverseasily arranged.SAMPLE ECONOMY CLASS ROUND TRIP FARES:(350 lbs. free baggage allowance included)From San Francisco and Los Angeles to:, Yokohama Hong Kong ManilaFrom: $558 to $756 $614 to $832 $643 to $869Around the world, Orient/Europe Around the Pacific, Orient/AustraliaBy Ship Sea/Air By Ship Sea/AirFrom: $804 $1162 $830 $971Summer/Fall Sailings from San Francisco—President Cleveland or Wilson*May 28, June 19, July 12, Aug. 5, Aug. 28, Sept. 21.AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINESAmerican President Lines, International Building,601 California Street, Dept. CP/1, San Francisco, Calif.Please send me information about your Economy Class service.Planning a trip to Number in partyLeaving ReturnInterested in joining a tour YESCommentsNameAddress NO.My Travel Agent is.RANDELL - HARPER SQUAREBEAUTY AND COSMETIC SALONOPEN EVENINGS5700 HARPER AVE. FA 4-2007MRS. BILLIE TREGANZA, PROP. TAPE SPECIAL TELEPHONE FAirfax 4-97131800* Mylar 3.49 BROWN'S BARBER SHOPAcetate 1200* 1.79 AIR CONDITIONED FOR YOUR COMFORTMODEL CAMERA HENRY K. BROWN, Prop.1342 E. 55th HY 3-9259 1011 EAST 53rd STREETNS A DISCOUNTS CHICAGO 15, ILL.April 9, 1963 • CHICAGO MAROON • 3E&R rules amendments invalid(Continued from pace I)vote is at least 15% of the stu¬dent body.A third amendment sponsoredby the Stagg Party was also ruledineligible by E & R because thesupporting petition did not con¬tain the requisite number of sig¬natures. The amendment wouldhave given voters negative voteswhich could have been cast singlyor in groups, for or against candi¬dates for office.Congdon also announcedthat Richard Bushong (GNO¬SIS) and Bonny Walter Lib¬eral Party) have withdrawnas SG candidates in the College.Jon Stephens has been added to theGNOSIS College slate.urnTHEYLAST...APRILBOOK SALE10% OFFon 100 Best Selling Busi¬ness, Technical andProfession Books,Get Your List AtThe University ofChicago Bookstore5802 Ellis Ave.TRAINEE POSITIONSat THE CHICAGOPUBLIC LIBRARYApplications now being ac¬cepted from graduating stu¬dents who can qualify forprogram of career develop¬ment offering:* a combination of on-the-job experience and profes¬sional education in librar-ianship.* training for a well-paidand personally rewardingprofessional career.APPLICANTS must be:* academically qualified foradmission t o accreditedgraduate library school.* personally qualified forpublic library service.FOR INFORMATIONPLEASE CONTACT:Mrs. Charlotte ShabinoPersonnel OfficeThe Chicago PublicLibraryChicago 2, Illinois Susan Workoff of POLIT is nolonger a candidate in the Schoolof Social Service Administration.In the Law School, Carl Klotz ofthe Law School Party has with¬drawn. Robert Richheimer haswithdrawn as a POLIT candidatein the Division of the Social Sci¬ences. Richard Gold, a candidatein the Division of the BiologicalSciences, is a member of POLIT.He was erroneously listed as aGNOSIS candidate in Friday’sMAROON.Today's eventsLecture Series, Committee cm South¬ern Asian Studies, Committee for Com¬parative Study of New Nations, LawSchool, ‘‘Law, Religion, and the Statein India: Hindu Law and HebrewLaw,” J. Duncan M. Derrett, visitingprofessor of Indian Law, professor ofOriental Laws, University of London,Law School, room 3, 3:30 p.m.Lecture, Department of Political Sci¬ence, ‘‘Ideals and Realities of the At¬lantic Community," Raymond Aron,Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes,Paris, Mandel Hall, 4 pm.Lecture Series, Department of His¬tory, "Personal Contracts BetweenChristians and Moslems in the MiddleAges: East Christians and Moslems,Religious and Cultural Contacts.” SirSteven Runciman, Alexander Whitevisiting professor. Department of His¬tory, Social Science 122, 4:30 pm. Heb¬rew Class. Hillel. 4:45 pm.Organ Recital, Walter Blodgett, Cura¬tor of Musical Arts, Cleveland Museumof Art, Rockefeller Chapel, 8:30 pm. 4 furn. rms., w. linens. Pvt. bath,porch. PL 2-1097.FOR SALE1962 VOLKS, convertible, very .clean,6000 miles, radio, heater plus extrasPvt. party $1,800. RE 1-9777.HI-FI Equipment: CONCERTONE model 20/20 professional recorder. $200Knight 50 stereo All-transistor amplitier $70, Stephens 15 inch theatre Bpeaker w. reflex cabinet (cost new $350$100. Rek-o-cut table, arm, G.E. StereoCartridge. $80. 12" E.V. SP12B in cabinet $40. Bogen DB10 - new tul>es $25The whole tot for $400. Call Roto MeNamara, ext. 3273 or write C/o S. GOffice, Ida Noyes Hall. full-time summer Job. Experiencedtypist-filist. Call 2217. new dorm.SG 090, WThF, 9-6, at all ballot boxes.The philosophical aspects of WilliamKlecka: a study of controversies.Course material—one official ballot. Noprerequisites. Staff.ARTY: Beware, Klecka rides again.BiUBOBBY: If you could do it, I can too.KleckaKLECKA: the only major party oncampus. tt-CAU I AUt COMOtTlONioOI5U65/ *31® ST.-y HAM TO 10 PM_ MI8-340T^ we WLMJL*ANCONA SCHOOLMONTESSORI SCHOOLIn Hyde Parkis now accepting applica¬tions forSEPT., 1963Call PL 2-435$ after 8:00 p.m. MUST SELL 7,000 books and periodicals in Italian, Latin, Greek, Frenchand German from 16th to 19th century,in the fields of humanities, literature,medicine, law, philosophy and all fields.Archeological pieces from 2nd centuryB.C. from $1.50 up. Oil paintings andlithographs, old stamped post cardsand letters. Open 11 am to 9 pm. 2915W. Cermak Rd. FR 6992 or 247-1264,WANTED2 USED late model, medium sl7.ed por¬table typewriter. Call HY 5-3256,PERSONALSPOLIT is NUMERALWISE EXPRES¬SIBLE.LETTERS OF APPLICATION: typedand at such reas. rates. Ext. 3552.NECKING si; frisbee no —Rowe.CONTRACT BRIDGE INSTRUCTIONS:Beginners, inter., advanced. Private orgroup. Lillian Letchinger, BU 8-1652.SUSSMAN Swings-vote for him. WANTED: Conservative Students toForm YAF or Conservative Groups onCampus and to Start a ConservativePaper. Free Literature and Cooperationin Organizing and Planning for BothWill be Supplied Free of Charge.Those Interested, Write E. J. McCollum, Jr.P.0. Box 1780, Bridgeport, Conn., orCall EDison 4-9471 Collect.Vote for RUSS KAY—he ran the OFFI¬CIAL Cuba poll.EXPERT typing at home. Call 431-2457.1 to 3 pm. DO 3-0433, evenings.JOHN MARTIN is infinitely surly.The J.M.I.S.F.U-HI pay 25c or go home.VIGOROUS, efficient secretary seeks shore drive motelFACING LAKE MICHIGANSpecial University of Chicago Rates. Beautiful Rooms,Free TV, Parking, Courtesy Coffee.Closest Motel to Univ. of Chicago and Museum of Science A Industry.FOR INFORMATION OR RESERVATIONSWRITE OR CALL Ml 3-2300SHORE DRIVE MOTEL54tk St. & Se. Shore Dr. • Chicago .37, IllinoisGet LuckyPlay "Crazy Questions”{Based on the hilarious book "The Question Man.**}50 CASH AWARDS A MONTH. ENTER NOW. HERE'S HOW:First, think of an answer. Any answer. Then come up witha nutty, surprising question for it, and you’ve done a“Crazy Question.*’ It’s the easy new way for students tomake loot. Study the examples below; then do your own.Send them, with your name, address, college and class,to GET LUCKY, Box 64F, Mt. Vernon 10, N. Y. Winningentries will be awarded $25.00. Winning entries sub¬mitted on the inside of a Lucky Strike wrapper wifi get a$25.00 bonus. Enter as often as you like. Start right now! RULES: The Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. will Judge entries on the basis ofhumor (up to Vs), clarity and freshness (up to Vs), and appropriateness (upto Vs), ond their decisions will be final. Duplicate prizes will be awardedin the event of ties. Entries must be the original works of the entrants endmust be submitted In the entrant's own name. There will be 50 award*every month, October through April. Entries received during each monthwill be considered for that month’s awards. Any entry received after April30, 1963, will not be eligible, and all become the property of The AmericanTobacco Company. Any college student may enter the contest, except em¬ployees of The American Tobacco Company, its advertising agencies andReuben H. Donnelley, end relatives of the said employees. Winners will benotified by mail. Contest subject to all federal, state, and local regulations.THE ANSWER:7VYAGNETIGPOLE*lloo eieis oSajO ues uepiMBSJBM luo-4 uenp uoa elies noA pinoM jbmm :NOIlS3n0 3HiTHE ANSWER:PUBLICSPEAKINGoSeojqo jo -Ajun ‘qSnex 'ft u»IIV;3uoi|da|d) siq JdMSue oiiqryPjbmso saop MOH :NOIJLS3n6 3HI THE ANSWER:PHYSICALED•Ajufl sjoujiu ujaqjnos ‘uuX|$3ft «-uei||<AAisnduieo uo ueuiIsaSuons sj oljm :N0llS3nd 3H1 j THE ANSWER:I 9Wcbiebal*!<>n»a 10 'Ajufl *||»q$ eojuefipeq qeq A|uo A||eaj si oi)M uosiad caquosap noA op moh - NOliSSnb 3H1THE ANSWER:Samuel eWs\j THE ANSWER:II 1•Ajufl uoiBujqseM 'jaj*etp$ ‘ft uqopcssau•isnq s.asja auoAjaAa jnoqe qoniu osmoum tues saop moh :N0LLS3nb 3Hi EmptySaddlesl-mossift jo 'Ajufl ‘sjiej cujfjspjoj•xomiqM pue >peiq papjeosip jo jied e||BD noA pjnoM jeijM :NOIlS3n6 3H1 JTHE ANSWER IS:Get Luckythe taste to start with...the taste to stay withTHE QUESTION IS: WHAT IS TEG YKCUL SPELLED BACKWARDS? Any way youlook at it, Lucky Strike spells pleasure —big smoking pleasure. The reason: Finetobacco taste. The result: Luckies are the most popular regular-size cigaretteamong college students. So get with your peer group. Get Lucky!© h. T. Cfc Product of ol/u, <j/nw\ic<w dvlaxec — c/olxwee is our middle name