Noonan: colleges can buildTwo educational philoso- ous studies of American collegeshers have asked if the for- and universities have shown thatn ttion of moral character can !ho student ^dy of each mstitu-11 tmn possesses a distinct character,he a function of the university. . .John Noonan, director of the Each college has imagenatural law institute at Notre ^.n Par,icular college will haven me university began his lecture, fn *maKe 6iat attracts a certainin the “Limits of kmd of students to apply to it.the second1 ibcral Education” series, yester¬day. before a Mandel hall audi-,.IUv of over 100. by quoting JohnHenry Newman and Robert May¬nard Hutchins.Both Newman and Hutchinshave, Noonan said, been concernedwiili “The responsibility of the col¬lege for the values of itsstudents,” the topic of his speech.Noonan raised five points inconnection with the inculcation ofcharacter traits by the college:l cun the college affect thecharacter of Its students; 2—should It do so; 3—how is this tohe done; 4—for what purposeshould moral issues he dealtwith; and 5—at what cost shouldcharacter be shaped.“By character is mean! a per¬sisting |>attem of attitudes andmotives,” Noonan explained, The college selects its studentsfrom those who do apply, andthese accepted students, statedNoonan, are, paradoxically, thesource of the image that attractsother, similar, students.Noonan asserted that the peergroup has a strong influence atcollege age. It is the college thatdetermines this peer group, thusmaking the most significant de¬cisions about factors affecting thecharacter of its students.Considering the second of hisquestions. Noonan stated that thecollege “cannot help” influencingthe character of its students. “Ineach way and at each junctionthat the college relates to thecharacter of its students it mustchoose between alternatives,” heexplained.There is of course a danger, lie Describes ideal characterNoonan described the id^alcharacter produced by salutoryinfluence fo the college as “innerdirected, responsive to the needsand demands of other human be¬ings, responsive to the demandsof God, tolerant, not self-centered,and concerned with the political,political and social life of his city,country and world because he isconcerned with man.“This type of person is open tovalues beyond those of the egoand the culture. A person withthe character Is, in the Berg-sonian term, a member of an‘open society’, the society that liasproduced heroes and saints.”This “model character,” Noonansaid, can be used in a considera¬ tion of how the college might helpdevelop such persons. NThe college can offer courses inethical responsibility, he con¬tinued. but “the risks loom large,”for such course might, for ex¬ample, convince the student thatethics was a matter of obeyingset formulae. And the role of thecurriculum, he added, is not asimportant as that of the spirit ofthe institution in effecting charac¬ter.’Spirit' affects studentsThe institution’s spirit is fosteredby the student body, which, asNoonan explained in his paradoxof admissions, has a virtually .selfperpetuating image; by the faculty,who can affect the studentthrough the force of personal ex¬ ample; and by the adminstration.which has a responsibility for theregulation of the college environ¬mentNoonan commented that the idealcharacter was best shaped whenthe students live in small co¬operative houses, not “dormitoriesin the shape of the Pentagon or anapartment hive.”The idea character cannot beformed, he emphasized, if it is at“a more than negligible cost tothe inculcation by the students ofa liberal education.”Concluding his discussion of thisideal character-shaping college,Noonan challenged that “if this isUtopia, it is not because it is im¬possible, but because it has neverbeen tried.”"which produce a rather predict- emphasized, in consciously inter-;ible kind of moral behavior” fering with the character of theThe psychologists say H"''* student. But the effect of influ-character is formed by I he age of ences on the student may be liber- Vol. 70 — No. 78ten, Noonan continued, but numer- ating. not restricting. University of Chicago, Wednesday, April 11, 1962 Cm 31Oppose postal censorshipMaroon press serriceWASHINGTON, DC.—Congressional opposition tothe postal rate bill is expected to grow following theobjections to the restriction.Deputy Attorney General Byron the House passed the measure lastIt. White recently wrote Olin D. month. The amendment was spon-.lohnston (D-SC), chairman of the sored by Glenn CunninghamSenate post office committee, ex- (R-Neb. >. the censorship provision inadministration’s announced Goodman discussesAmerican universitiesJohnston’s committee is nowconsidering the postal bill, whichwould raise mail rates by aboutplaining the administration’s posi¬tion.White said the amendment,described by its sponsors as aneffort to keep Communist propa- $690 million a year. The measure-anda out of the mails, is is one of the major it^ms on Ken-objectionable in its present nedy’s legislative program.Enactment of the postal bill isThe 17 page letter listed five regarded as certain. But there hasn-ajor objections to the provision, been considerable discussion aboutwritten into the postal bill when the censoi-ship provision andThe old SQ White’s letter undoubtedly willstrengthen the hands of opponents.The best bet is that the con¬troversial amendment will be re¬vised or dropped either in John¬ston’s committee or on the Senatefloor. If that happens, it will beup to Senate-House conferees todecide its ultimate fate.The House may insist on someform of the restriction in the finalbill. But if it gets anything, it willbe only a watered-down version.White did not say what—if any¬thing -would be acceptable to theadministration, although he saidit was “sympathetic with themotivation” for the amendment.White listed these objections:“1. It would deprive even thosein our country who have a legiti¬mate reason to receive foreignCommunist political propaganda,however defined, of the opportuni¬ty to do so.“2. It cfoes not provide anadequate definition of Communistpolitical propaganda.“3 Even assuming an adequatedefinition, the legal and adminis-(confinued on page 7)Gradualist way to peace American colleges anduniversities have maintainedimportant self - governingcommunities against the en¬tire style of our society, said PaulGoodman, author and professor ofsociology at Columbia university.Sneaking on “The academiccommunity’’ last night in Mandelhall, Goodman gave the thirdlecture in the Aims of Educationweek program sponsored by theOrientation board and the College.Of 1,900 colleges and universi¬ties in the country, said Goodman,a majority have fewer than f>0()students and fewer than 75teachers, yet they “carry onimportant decision-making func¬tions.”“With the exception of a fewgiants like Columbia or the Uni¬versity of Chicago, most schoolsare run like relatively autonomouscommunities. The president of acollege in America is like a tip¬top executive,” continued Good¬man. “only freer. The board oftrustees leaves him alone.”'Exceptions, he said, were Co¬lumbia which is “run like a bank,”and Chicago. “This place is runlike a real estate office.”The autonomy of the College isessential to fulfilling the function of that institution. It’s function,he said, “is to complete the grow¬ing-up of young people to com¬mencement. I don’t think it ispossible to do this without somesort of community.”Goodman then explained thetwo possible types of educationalrelationship. A young person canwant to know something and canlatch onto an older person whoteaches him • what he wants toknow. On the other hand, a teach¬er with something to say canpropagate his idea, gatheringdisciples.The latter system is the way theUniversity of Paris of Peter Abe¬lard was originally formed, hesaid. In either case the essentialrelationship was that between stu¬dent and teacher. It is this re¬lationship that is essential tg theprocess of preparing the student"for the anthropological ritual olcommencement,” according toGoodman. “Commencement is thejudgment by adults chosen by thestudents that students have be¬come their peer and can proceedon his own initiative in a profes¬sion as they do,” he explained.“In its pure form the college isnothing but the institution pre¬paring the student for commence-(continued on page 7)Faculty establishes chaptersA chapter of the Councils of the Gradualist Way to Peace has been establishedat the University of Chicago by 16 faculty members.Hans J. Morganthau, professor of political science and director of the Center forthe Study of American Foreign and Military Policy, was nominated temporarychairman oP the group. *Party differences were settled on the basketball courtin 1955, when the Independent Student league and the Stu¬dent Representative party took to the boards. The ref¬erees, the two independents in Student Government thatyear, won the game tby their own scoring).' Issues facing this year's SG are discussed in the spe¬cial supplement starting on page three. See also theMaroon endorsements for College representatives andNSA delegation on page two, along with an editorial on«*e election. . * He stated: “The purpose of thegroup is to search for realisticalternatives to the extremes ofnuclear war or surrender in thestruggle with the Soviet bloc.“The world is presently facedwith two unacceptable alterna¬tives: preparation for war withthe expectation that it is inevit¬able, and preparation for warwith the expectation that suchpreparation will prevent it.“While the possibilities for pro¬gress by unilateral action on thepart of the United States arelimited, we seek, possible changesin US policy which hold thepromise of leading to bilateral ormultilateral changes in policy.”Faculty members at 15 majoruniversities have establishedCouncils of the Gradualist Way toPeace.The councils include conser¬vatives as well as liberals, Re¬ publicans as well as Democrats.Representatives of all major re¬ligions and of other interestedgroups are being asked to jointhe Councils.Tlie UC Council will meet nextweek to consider policy papersto be drafted by members of thegroup on specific foreign policyquestions.Morganthau stated that ap¬proved policy proposals would bebrought “to the attention of of¬ficials in the government andmembers of Congress.” They willalso approach responsible publicopinion through magazines andspeeches to community organiza¬tions.”The first topic to be discussedby the group is US foreign policyin Vietnam.The current members of theUC Council are Herbert S. An¬ker, biochemistry; Bruno Bettel- heim, education, psychology, andpsychiatry; Michael Cherniavsky,history; Charles Dicken, psych¬ology and psychiatry; Fred Eg-gan.^anthropology and chemistry;Lloyd A. Fullers, anthropology;Herman Finer, political science;Clifford Geertz, anthropology;Louis Gottschalk, history; MortonGrodzins, political science; Leo¬pold Haimson, history; RobertHavinghurst, education and hu¬man development; Morris Jano-witz, sociology, Walter Johnson,history; Bernard M. Loonier,divinity; Duncan MacRae, Jr.,political science; W. A. Pitcher,divinity; Peter Rossi, sociology,Joel Seidman, social science andbusiness; Art Stinchcombe, visit¬ing professor in sociology; SolTax, anthropology; Robert W.Wissler, pathology and chemistry;and Robert Paul Wolff, philos¬ophy.- • • ' ■' v ,-' \> --rf; :f\1 /|:I,’,iVIIr EditoriolWe find ourselves therefore. inven if we grant that SC should say East house, would elcc^ three ag»^ment with the talk ot the:*ern itself only with matters delegates. It might then be true ' , . T' „SG should be concerned with total societyStudent Government on this most crucial in the present cam- campus issues. This is blatantly and generally discarded, before. delegates, proportioning thecampus alweys seems to fall into Pa'8n> Primary this year as al- untrue. No single interest group Advocates of this form of repre- raining 25 as is presently done,the same pattern. There are one wa's ai( positixe piogiams ean the force of the sensation claim that it will bring us a manifestly 1jo»or two parties each year which viding an accurate forecast of SG entire student body. While it might representation closer to the stu- some of 1he professional sch^.khave worked coneientiously activity for the coming year. be argued that not everybody dents - since living units will can elect the same representativethroughout the year running the -pwo tbe parties, ANTI and vo(es in SG elections, so Govern- choose representatives from among as 250 individuals voting in theaffairs of SG and providing ser- DOWN, want to do nothing other ment is not representative of the themselves, they will be “closer” College. The at large delegatesvices outside the organization, than abolish Student Government, whole community, this is the un- and more in control of their dele- woV1d balance out representation,Then, within a few' weeks of Gov- This point was discussed in yes- fortunate truth about every re- cates giving each student a.more equiUuernment elections several other terday’s editorial, and we do not . .. . ’ .’ ... . ble voice in the voting,parties suddenly appear, critici- feel that it is worthy of any fur- Presonlat,ve democracy in the This cla.m is totally specious,zing loudly everything that has ther serious consideration. Of the "OI^ ’ "et us assume *bat a living unit,taken place in SG for the past remaining groups, Iron Guard hastw’elve months. offered no positive program w’or- concern itself onlyThis vear unfortunately is no thy of comment, and the I .aw directly atfecting students we get 1 a’ the residents of East houseexception. At the start of the year school party, which deals with a great deal ol trouble. It would be somewhat closer to thesethere were three political parties but one group of students, deals 1S manifestly impossible to talk jbiee delegates than they aie toon Campus: the Independent Re- with specific problems which we abou< academic freedom without ,h<? presently elected Assemblyform party GRP), POUT, and the are unable to judge. discussing the total society. Nor mem >rs. But these individuals . .... . 1h actions of ti.«v i can tederal aid to education be would comprise perhaps less than justified by ihe actions of thisPDDm K ^ t This leaves US with but ,hroe intelligently discussed if the ge- ten percent of the total Assembly, year’s POUT controlled govern-< PRO). PRO disbanded last quar- major parlies IRP, POLIT, and neral purpose and function of the This represents absolutely no ment. The efforts of SG in the pastter leaving, we inougnt two par- UP and we procede now to a federal government is not consi- change in the current balance of months have been perhaps *heties which would tun SG slates. consideration * of their platforms. dored Where can the line be power. most fruitful in the fifteen yearBut, suddenly and pi edictabl\ major diference of opinion draw n? Only, it would seem, at A system of dormitory repre- bistory ol SG. We have a coope-five new groups have materialized bctween TOl_IT on the one hand ,he broad limit of general consi- sentation would inevitably lead to ra,,ve booksl°^savin^ s,uden,swithin the past few weeks. These an(J IRp and up on tho other deration about the total society in conflicts of interest and dormi-include: the Association of un- eoncerns lhe baSjc oriantation of which and by which we are being tory-line voting. This system isTolerating Independents (ANTI), S(udpnt Government. POLIT sees educated. to tally out of context with a . . ..We are not to take seriously student government which should ISC,P inary commit ee. oihapsthan basically on campus issues; the claims of IRP and UP that retain a broad view of the cam- mosl 've hayc a Goy-it would have the Assembly deal Student Government has been pus situation. ernment whJCh has intelligently. . ... .with matters of national and inter- spending its time about ‘Tinner Tn rouliiv nmumonk r»f an" ar,,culately represented stu-Withstand Nonsense -(DOWN), natinna, ciernificanee TPP and TTP vZUo" ~ in reality, proponent* of dorml- dpn1s on issues of importanceIron Guard the University-party significance. IRp and UP, \olta or sending arms to Alge- tory representation are tilting at throughout the vearon the other hand, are concerned ria and Cuba. In fact, this year's a windmill which is totally non-primarily with the services which Government has been unusual in existent. Student Government re- most of what IRP and UP haveto say. We are, thus, endorsingPOLIT as a party and the POLITplatform as a whole.We feel that this support ismore than $4,000 we have morediscount travel than ever before;we have student observers on thewhich ran one candidate last year gG as ^ concerned with morcbut which this year has presentedan almost full slate in the College,the Democratic Organization toiUP), and the law7 school party(IJSP).None of the individuals runningon these slates have ever served questionsin Student Government, certainlyno more than one or two of them This does not mean that therethe Government can provide, men¬tioning nothing about off-campus the extent to which it has con- preservatives are as close to their are no1 modified individuals run¬ning on other slates. It is for thisreason that we have chosen toThe major difference of opinionhave attended an SG meeting at °( 1 oslrich policy - since stu-all. Even a more open question, is dents cannot change the coursewhether any of these people careabout Student Government at all.One indicant of the interest ofthe various parties in serious stu¬dent political activity can be ob¬served from reviewing non-Governmenthas heen lined itself to student oriented constituents as the constituentsquestions. want to make them. SG’s office is , ... -.The parties are interestingly almost always open, Assembly ?ndo™ candidates running bothsplit on the three referenda and meetings are open, and interested or . an PT * ur ,eco™-the one straw poll to appear on individuals are free to come to 1110,1 at ions, w ic appear on t isof the world why should they try the election ballot. One of these, meet their representatives. The Jl^.TfhTNSA^lee^tio.rsinceto? Nothing could make less sense, concerning the abolition of Student tact that this is rarely done speaks K . . . ... Jv. . ’ 'It has become a cliche to talk Government, we discussed yester- more to the apathy of the student s . s .»of the role of “the student in the day. body than to any problem in SG’sTwo of the referenda concern organization. most familiar. We have nol en¬dorsed candidates from ANTI,w_ , DOWN, or Iron Guard because we—. _ . . , . .. other, POLIT-sponsored re- that tbe basic principles nfactiv ity in the past. POLIT alfa,rs have historically used this ernment. Both UP and IRP are solution concerns, again, SG s or- Jhesc |iM are totalJy opposed?en active in presenting ser- as their rallying cry. They rightly asking for representation by dorm- ganization. The resolution would fo fhat whjch we feej studenttotal community.” Adherents ofstudent participation in national the restructuring of Student Gov-ious speakers and discussions of claim that no individual can f5r- itory living unit. This is not a new make the Assembly smaller and Government should follow.important local and national is- *ds responsibility as a citizensues. None of the other groups merely because he happens to bohas brought speaker to campus, a s'udent in a university. Thenone have devoted caucuses to academic life and a social con-discussions of anything outside the sience are not mutually exclusive,immediate interest of the party. it is claimed by representativesWhile these considerations are of the University party that theimportant in indicating the mo- numerous political groups on thetives of the various political par- UC campus can adequately re¬ties, they are perhaps not the present the student body on off-iFEconomics Majorwith Fine Arts Styling idea - it has been talked about, would create fifteen “at-large*Maroon endorsementsCOLLEGEPat Chesney (POLIT)Len Friedman (POLIT)Caryle Geier (POLIT)Pete Harrison <IRP)Ken Heyl (UP)Gene Kadish (POLIT)Russel Kay (POUT)Al Levy (IRP)Paul Levy (POUT)NS A DELEGATESRick Chesney (POLIT)Len Friedman (POLLS)Carylr Geier (POLIT)Arthur MacEwan (POUT)Murray Schacher (POUT) Richai*d Merbaum (POLIT)Anhur MacEwan (POLIT)Mike Ormond (POLIT)Pam Procuniar (POLIT)Peter Rabinowitz (POLIT)Bruce Rappaport (POLIT)Terri Ray (POLIT)Jane Saxe (POUT)Mike Wollan (POLIT)Robert Workoff (POLIT)NSA ALTERNATESBruce Rappaport (POLIT)Terri Ray (POLIT)Jane Snxe^POLIT)Mike Wollan (POLIT)Robert Workoff (POLIT) A w’ord must be added aboutthe election of National Studentassociation delegates and alter¬nates. The National Student assieciation is the vehicle which mustrepresent the American student onissues of national importance. Di-l¬egates to the national and regionalmeetings of NSA must be expe¬rienced in the ways of the asso¬ciation and must present intel¬ligent representation of the Uni¬versity of Chicago if they are toreflect credit on the school. POUTwe feel is running an ideal slate;their candidates know their wayaround NSA and should be mosteffective delegates. We urge astraight POUT delegation vote.Despite the screams of severalcandidates, Student Governmentis a matter to be taken seriously.It is only through considered vot¬ing that w7e can have a Govern¬ment of which we can be justifia¬bly proud.4.This one goes to the head of the class—with thelowest wagon price in the U. S.f the highesthonors for top gas mileage, and the longestyears of high resale value among all compacts.That’s the Rambler American Deluxe 2-DoorWagon for you. And when you consider its clean,crisp styling that lives so smartly with the years(we don’t make drastic changes merely for thesake of change), you really have a good andhandy thing going for you. Try it on all counts—at your Rambler dealer’s.RAMBLERAmerican Motors Means More for Americans Arrow33aivJ^m. "PARithits th,e mark forcomplete comfortNo matter what you do you’ll lookyour best and feel your best wearingan Arrow Ban-LON “Par.”It gives you the action of a knitcombined with a bright arrayof colors and a soft absorbent hand.Completely washable.Short sleeves- >5.95-ARROW'From the"Cum Laude Collection*2 • CHICAGO MAROON • *r« 11. 19*2•, SG ELECTIONCandidates discuss SUPPLEMENT •SG election issuesThe following report consists of(weipts from a discussion of Stu-ilent Government (SG) sftonsoredjointly by WUCB and the Maroon.All campus political parties wereinvited to send representatives tothe discussion, ami all but theDemocratic Organization to With-Siam! Nonsense (DOWN) and theindependent Reform party (IRP)particifHited. Jay Greenberg, edi¬tor of the Maroon, moderated thediscussion. The entire discussionUsas broadcast last night by WU-t*B.Greenberg: We’ll start off bydiscussing what I think is one ofthe more crucial issues of thiscampaign, and that is the veryexistence ol Student Governmentitself.laMtnard Friedman, POLIT: Youcan only consider this question byjudging it on a philosophic basis.This is the problem that all par¬ties in previous years have had.They always ask, “has the StudentGovernment for the past year beendoing what it should have beendoing?” This, of course, is an ab¬surd basis on which to judge whe¬ther or not you want a StudentGovernment. The decision to havea Student Government was madeat a time right after the war, whenit was felt that students neededsome means of expressing theiropinions on University matters andon matters affecting th^m as citi¬zens of the country. I think theseneeds are just as pressing now asthey ever were. The services SGCan provide are just as necessary,and the problems that studentsface are just as severe today. Theneed for a Student Governmentdefinitely does exist.Bill Glow, Iron Guard: In thisparticular case we’re talking aboutANTI (the Association of Nod-Tolerating Independents) andDOWN. The word has gone aroundthat they are crackpots. But weof Iron Guard don’t think they are.We think that they represent agenuine dissatisfaction and disaf¬fection with SG and we think ithas a legimate basis.Student Government has beenrun by cliques for a long time.Right now the leading party,POLIT, is an amalgamation of thetwo other leading parties. In otherwords, the two cliques got toge¬ther and threw out the right wing.They interact among themselves.They have their own coterie offollowers. They make no effort toget into the dormitories.They make no effort to organizewhen they need some support oncampus wide issues. A few' noticeson bulletin boards will not suffice.The students feel isolated fromSG. I've gone over to Pierce tow¬er, I talk to the students there.They say “Nobody ever talks toUs, we feel like we’re another university. We don’t even feel anyaffection for SG. at all.”R. A. Wilson. ANTI: I thinkLen is right when he says thatthe real question is not whetherSG in the last year has done w'hatSG should, but that we shouldtake an overall view' of SG inthe past many years, and also inthe future.The real crucial question thatwe’re reaching at this point in theelections is: Can SG ever do whatit should? Now, UP (Universityparty) says that as SG is presentlyorganized, cannot do what it issupposed to do. UP feels thatby reorganizing SG, by changingthe method of election, that some¬how it is going to get a bettercampus representation.I think that there is a greatfeeling on this campus that oneof the major problems of SG isthe representation and that many,many, many people feel that SGdoes not represent overall campusopinion. We of ANTI feel thatin its present form, or in almostany form, that has been suggested,can never reflect student opinion.The Student Government here atthis University is needless.Gerry Maobeath, UP: I shouldthink that the great number ofpolitical parties originated thisyear and contending for seatswould indicate that SG has notreached the utoffcan level whichmany parties describe that it willreach. Looking at the philosophicalbasis of Student Government isnot sufficent to determine whichparty would run SG in futureyears. If we look at SG wre candetermine which (parties) con¬ceivably could organize a StudentGovernment that could meet stu¬dent needs most effectively.Now we have contendedthroughout this campaign thatPOLIT in its administration hascertainly not met the needs of thestudent as a student.Here we think a definition canbe made. A student is not just anamorphous being who has a num¬ber of reactions any one of whichcan be dictated by SG presumablyrepresenting him. We can delinehis needs and his w’elfare as a stu¬dent. We can see what his finan¬cial obligations are, what his so¬cial responsibilities are, and how'SG may most effectively help himin these capacities. And I thinkthat if SG was so organized, itwould be able to meet the needsof the student and there wouldbe less reaction against the acti¬vities that it does perform.One of the reasons for this, justmentioned, is representation. Noone actually is responsible in SGto an electorate. No one is heldfor any of the issues that he agi¬tates for in SG, and therefore hecan adopt a more philosophicalREFERENDAThe following referenda are for the consideration of theentire student body. They can only be enacted if a majority ofthose registered students voting approve them and if the totalvotes cast represent at least 15% of the eligible electorate.1. Do you approve of the change in fraternity rushing fromthe winter quarter to the fall quarter for first year students?2. (Constitutional amendment)In Article II Section A, strike the word “fifty” and substi¬tute the word “twenty-five.” Add Section D: “15 representativesshall be elected at large in an all-campus election.”3. (Constitutional Amendment)In Article II Section C, strike, the words “The College”and substitute the following:The following University houses shall be treated as electoralunits for the purpose of selecting representatives to StudentGovernment from the college: New dorm7 Burton-Judson courts,Pierce tower, C-group, and Blackstone, insofar as these dormitoriesContain College students. All College students resident in frater¬nity houses shall be treated as one electoral unit. Those Collegestudents not living in any of the foregoing houses shall constituteOne electoral unit. Any other contiguous University housing con¬taining more than 70 College students shall constitute an electoral■Unit. If any of the foregoing specifically enumerated Universitybouses comes to contain less than 70 students, it shall cease toconstitute an electoral unit.4. (Constitutional amendment)Student Government at the University of Chicago shallcease to exist at midnight, the last day of the fourth week of theSpring Quarter, 1962.All uncommitted funds in possession of the Student Govern¬ment at the above date will be turned back to the University ofChicago Student Activities office. basis which really doesn’t sayanything at all for the practicalissues oi campus.Therefore we would wish to seea residental representation systemset up which would ensure eachstudent of a representative forhis particular view's.Richard Fine, Law School party:The basic idea of Student Govern¬ment, although it may be a philo¬sophical concept, is more a practi¬cal one. In other w'ords, what canthe Student Government do for thestudents, what has it done in thepast, what can it do in the future.This is the type of thing that theLaw School party has'put forthin its platform.SG should not be a forum onnational and international affairsunless a majority or a sizable mi¬nority of students w’ish to havethe backing of the University ofChicago on any particular issue.SG is being used as a debatingclub. We feel that Student Gov¬ernment is definitely out of placeas a forum, we feel that wre wouldrather see a Student Governmentwith a little less hullabaloo anda little more action.Greenberg: Leonard, you saidthat the student on -This campushas certain needs which only SGcan fulfill. I wonder what theseneeds are.Friedman, POLIT: In the Uni¬versity community there are cer¬tain specific groups that havespecific needs of their own. Thedormitories are examples of this.Certainly it has always been SG’sattempt and purpose to encouragethe formation of house councilsthat can deal with problems thatare restricted to particular houses.In the same sense it is the respon¬sibility of SG to deal with issuesthat face the whole University. Auniversity bookstore is a good ex¬ample of a service that transcendsany of the divisions within a uni¬versity ci mmunity. I don’t seehow' the other parties can getaround the necessity of havingrepresentation that is of the wholecampus, deals with problems thatthe whole Pampus must face, andserves needs that the whole cam¬pus has.Maobeath, UP: Although thesystem of residential representa¬tion is certainly not perfect, it isperhaps the most realistic attemptat bringing SG closer to the stu¬dents. Now a student spends, un¬fortunately, the plurality of histime in his living unit. This iswhere he sees his closest friends,eats his meals, and does most ofhis studying. And so this is wherehis ideas actually are conceivedand where he does discuss issuesthat affect him as a student.Therefore I think this is perhapsthe best place to bring our repre¬sentation, to the students in theirliving units, so that they can dis¬cuss these issues.Greenberg: Another very liveissue in this campaign is that ofthe orientation of Student Gov¬ernment. Should SG be concernedmore with issues on campus, stu¬dent services: or should it be con¬cerned more with the expressionof the student point of view' on offcampus issues.Glow, IG: I don’t think thestudent can afford to renege onhis responsibility as a citizen ina broader context than as a citi¬zen of the University community.We’re faced right now with theprospect of being completely anni¬hilated. There are terrible, terri¬ble, decisions to be made aboutwhat’s to be done about civil rightsin the South, what’s to be doneabout discrimination in the North,and w'hat’s to be done about a great many other issues. In mypersonal opinion the universitystudents in this country are moreright-headed on these issues thananybody else in this country. Itwould be stupid of them and itwould be shameful of them if theydidn’t make their voices heard.MeBeath, UP: I might point outthat there are a number of organi¬zations on this campus which feelthey can express the politicalviews of the students: they num¬ber around fifteen. There is onlyone Student Government on thiscampus to concern itself with thewelfare of the students. It wouldseem, therefore, that SG shoulddirect all of its attention towardsfulfilling the needs of the studentas a student before it even ven¬tures to think about providingany service as a mentor of stu¬dent opinion on any other issues.In the election I personallywould not give my mandate to adelegate to vote for me on anissue that is not related to im¬personal w'elfare as a student,until I was completely aware thatall my needs wrere first taken careof.Wilson, ANTI: On^ of the greatsupports that both ANTI andDOWN have on this campus is thegreat number of students who areso completely dissatisfied with thearientation of SG.Greenberg: You would like tosee your non-existent Student Gov¬ernment change its very nature?Wilson: I would rather see itsexistence be changed.Friedman, POLIT: None of youare talking about a POLIT Stu¬dent Government, you’re talkingabout w-hat you want to charac¬terize as the POLIT Student Gov¬ernment. The POLIT StudentGovernment has of course spentmost of its time dealing with is¬sues theat are right on the cam¬pus.There’s no basis for the separa¬tion that Gerry Macbeath hasmade. The only way that theseparation could be made is if youcould argue that the. University ofChicago was a perfectly insulatedivory tower and that none of theinfluence of the society could pos¬sibly touch students at theUniversity. And obviously thisisn’t true. Equally obviously a lotthe questions concerning the so¬ciety to affect the students andthey’re issues that the studentsare ocncerned about and want tobe represented on.Greenberg: What are your opi¬nions on the proper fuctions ofthe National student association?Friedman, POLIT: POLIT feelsthat NSA actually is the best ve¬hicle for students expressing theiropinions on matters of greater than it is much more the workof NSA than the local studentgovernment on matters such aslocal concern. We feel that edu¬cation and support of the sit-insin the South. This is what POLITdelegations in NSA have beendoing, and this is what w-e havebeen supporting this year in ourplatform.The Association in the past hasneglected some of areas of con¬cern. I think that UP has beensaying that NSA hasn’t beenspending enough time in provid¬ing student services. We’ve alwaystried to convince NSA to spendmore time in this area.Macbeath, UP: I think the Na¬tional Student association loses allof its effectiveness when it wouldwish to affiliate itself with theStudent Non-Violent Coordina¬tion committee (SNCCi and w'ithTurn Toward Peace, I think thatNSA’s effectiveness stands, as ourStudent Government’s effective¬ness stands, in its relation to mat¬ters affecting students. But theline is hard to draw and we w'ouldcertainly not want to make anarbitrary decision. Matters on fe¬deral aid to education of coursemust be dealt with in NSA. AlsoHUAC (the House committee onun-American activities* and “Ope¬ration Abolition,” which misrepre¬sents the America nstudent, mustbe* dealt with in NSA. But wethink that this line can effectivelybe drawn. We think the number ofstudent services provided throughNSA must be increased.Greenberg: R. A. Wilson, sinceNSA is an association of studentgovernments, and since you wouldabolish the University of ChicagoStudent Government, you wouldquite naturally disaffiliate theUniversity from NSA. Why.Wilson, ANTI: Not necessarily.I am not against the NSA. I thinkthat it could serve a very usefulpurpose, that it could mobilizestudent opinion on a national basis.I think that perhaps some othermeans of selecting our representa¬tives to NSA could be found. Iwould like to see a slate of NSAdelegates which would representthe University of Chicago campusopinion to NSA. I do not thinkthis has happened in the past nordo I think that under our presentsetup it will happen in the future.Greenberg: R. A., how muchmore representative can delegatesbe than if they are chosen by all¬campus election?Wilson: It’s not a question ofbeing representative; its a questionof responsibility. I think that thepresent student government andthose in the past few years haveshown themselves to be absolutelyirresponsible.Voting procedure givenBallot box scheduleWednesday, April 11Mandel hall ........ 9 am to 7pmCobb hall 9 am to 4:30 pmHarper library .... 9 am to 4:39 pmsocial Kciencen .... 9 to 11:39 amEckhart 9 to 11:39 amBotany .... 11:39 am to 3:39 pmMedical student’slounge 11:39 am to 2:39 pmSnell - Hitchcock .. 2:39 to 7 pmC-group 3:39 to 7 pmPierce tower ...... 4:39 to 7 pmNew dorm 4:39 to 7 pm Nineteen College represent-a t i v e s, 31 representativesfrom the graduate divisionsand schools^ as well as fiveNational Student association dele¬gates and five alternates, will bechosen by the campus tomorrow,Thursday, and Friday in the 16thStudent Government election.All students registered on cam¬pus this quarter are eligible tovote upon presentation of a vali¬dated identification card to theelection officials (see ballot boxschedules for tomorrow' in the sup¬plement). At the polling placeswill be officials from the electionand rules committee, deputiesfrom each party, and poll watch¬ers.At each polling place there isa book with the names of all stu¬dents registered as of April 4,J962. When a student presentshis identification card to the elec¬tion officials, his name will hechecked in their book and he willsign the official sheet.Each voter will receive a ballotfor the seats in his academic unit,a ballot for the NSA delegation,and a ballot for the four referendaon the ballot.Choice of a particular candidateis indicated by an “X” in theparentheses following his or hername. Voters selecting more than 19 caididatos in the Colllege, morethan five NSA delegates or alter¬nates, or more than the assignednumber of representatives in thedivisions, will have their ballotsinvalidated. Write-in votes maybe added in any division. Studentsm?vy vote for less than the maxi¬mum numbet’ of representatives inany division of the ballot.Over 180 students are runningin this election on the platformof six parties (there is also anindependent). The full platformof the parties that have platformsare located in this supplement, aswell as the slates for the assemblyand NSA and a list of the refer¬enda.Counting will take place Fridayevening in the Reynolds club andelection results will be broadcastthat evening by WUCB, the cam¬pus radio station.Poll-watchers neededThe election and rules (E&R)committee of Student Govern¬ment needs poll-watchers today,tomorrow, and Friday. All thosewho can spare an hour or moreare asked to contact an E&Rcommittee member al the bal¬lot box in Mandel hall corridor,between 9 am and 7 pm.AprilU. 1962 • CHICAGO MAROON • 3POLIT PLA DOWN PLATFORMPOLIT is a political party con¬cerned with liberal political action.It acts as an independent group,often working with other organi¬zations and through Student Gov¬ernment on campus, community,national, and international issues.POLIT bases its program on thepremise that education is neces¬sary for effective action and thataction itself is educational.POLIT’S policy and course ofaction are determined in opencaucus by its members. Member¬ship is open to all persons com-mited to liberal action as the so¬lution to today's problems.A POLIT Government considersthat its responsibility to the stu¬dent body is to: 1) provide serv¬ices to the student body; 2) re¬present the student body to theadministration and to the com¬munity; 3) promote education andaction on issues of political con¬cern; and 4) work in the NationalStudent association to promoteliberal political action among stu¬dents at the University of Chicagoand throughout the nation.POLIT believes that politicalunderstanding and action are ne¬cessary parts of the education ofstudents. Campus student govern¬ments and NSA should provideinformation on issues affectingstudents and provide a means foreffective student action. Campusaction such as support for theOrientation board and protestsagainst University housing discri¬mination, and national action,such as continued efforts of theStudent Nonviolent Coordinatingcommittee and the establishmentof the International Student Co¬operative union must be encour¬aged by representative studentorganizations.ServicesParties opposing POLIT in thiselection and “campus oriented”parties in previous elections havehad much to say about how muchbetter Government would be iftheir group could control Govern¬ment and channel all resourcesinto campus projects. The studentservices provided by the twoPOLIT administrations have beensuccessful beyond parallel withany “campus oriented” adminis¬tration in the history of SG. Suchsuccess is a direct result of PO¬LIT’S firm conviction that stu¬dents • must act — both as citi¬zens of their society and in estab¬lishing service which reduce edu¬cational and supplementary ex¬penses. The philosophy of “cam¬pus oriented” parties has not leadto action but to endless negotia¬tions with the administrationabout providing student servicesor changes in student serviceswhen it is obvious that the na¬ture of the University bureau¬cracy leaves no alternative butfor students to act for themselves.POLIT government initiatedservices in the following areas:Domestic Travel. The firstsuccessful interim flight to NewYork was held this year savingeach student about $20. Busestook over 120 students to NewYork for a total round-trip fareof $26.25.International Travel. The firstSG jet charter flight to Europeat a round-trip rate of $255 wassecured for UC students. A second non-jet flight was of¬fered for those who wished tospend only four weeks insteadof the entire summer.Books. POLIT members andthe unqualified support of thePOLIT SG administration com¬bined to create what will be¬come, with student support, themost significant development instudent services in the country.The International Student Co¬operative union has 1000 mem¬bers on this campus and hassaved them over $4000 on bookpurchases amounting to $20,000since its inception in October.The Student Service center inthe Reynolds club basement con¬tinues to provide 1) $15 loans tostudents for periods of two weeks;2) the best campus facilities forused books exchange; 3) the bestlaundry and dry cleaning pricesand services; and 4) ticket servicefor Orchestra hall. tion as the campus agent forthe ISCU, expanding and im¬proving all services offered.3) Expansion of the StudentSei’viee Center facilities — par¬ticularly the ticket service fordowntown theatres and con¬certs. A subsidy from the SGbudget would be used at firt ifnecessary.4) Support provided for stu¬dents wishing to organize co¬operative living groups, and re¬quest of the administration thatsuch groups be incorporatedinto the recently announced ex¬pansion of University housingfacilities.RepresentationPOLIT feels that the relation¬ships between students and ad-(continued on page 6) I. The goal of DOWN is toabolish Student Government atihe University of Chicago. To doso, DOWN has placed an amend¬ment to the Constitution of Stu¬dent Government on the ballot inthe current elections which, ifpassed, will abolish Student Gov¬ernment:.We expect that if the voterturnout is only the 20r/r-30% nor¬mal in SG elections, the amend¬ment may not receive the neces¬sary majority. Therefore, DOWNhas also nominated 8 candidatesfor office. These, together withthe 18 candidates nominated byANTI (who share our goal) con¬stitute a possible majority in theSG assembly. If elected, we arecommitted to work for Ihe aboli¬ tion of Student Government. But.having no personal political am¬bitions, we would much prefer thatthe amendment be passed.The general reasons for .ourviews are: 1) that Student Gov*ernment performs no functionthat can not be performed as wellif not better, by other existinggroups; and, 2) that StudentGovernment has inherent liabili¬ties. > mOfsp<meGolh<Goexiev<feeCl'tII. 1. The co-op bookstore. Withso many persons claiming creditfor the co-op, some facts shouldbe made clear. The InternationalStudent Co-operative Union, Inc.,is a corporation set up underChapter 185 of the WisconsinStatutes. As such, it has no eon-*(continued on page 6) th<wisetislibiTLSI» PLATFORM 1UJapiW,rechaiThPOLIT Governmentin the next yearWith POLIT’s unmatched rec¬ord of achievement as a guaran¬tee, you can expect the follow¬ing:1) Further improvement inthe travel programs — all pos¬sible cost reductions and ex¬tensions to the West Coast andother student home areas.2) Continuation of SG’s posi- The Law Student party is anad hoc organization with neitherfinances nor active members. Thesole purpose of the LSP is theelection of students from the lawschool who will represent the in¬terests of the law school and theUniversity.The three candidates of the LSPrepresent differing beliefs, view¬points, backgrounds, and persua¬sions. More by accident than de¬sign they represent a balanced group: a conservative, a liberal,and a moderate.However, despite their differ¬ences, the candidates agree on twoessential points which constitutetheir program: FIRST, that Stu¬dent Government, if it is to serveany valid function, must be aninterest group of the students anda service organization for the stu¬dents and the University. It fol¬lows from this that, student gov¬ernment should be apolitical andIP PLATFORMThe University party would liketo see a Student Governmentworthy of a great University. Aspirit of cooperation in a “Com¬munity of Scholars,” a tolerancefor minority expression (virtuallynon-existent in SG policy com¬mittees) and an untiring concernfor the students’ welfare should bethe guiding principles of a respec¬table, representative StudentGovernment.It is essentially our belief thatstudents stand to gain more byworking with the University thanagainst it. We believe that theUniversity is interested in its stu¬dents and will give a sym¬pathetic hearing to any well-reasoned presentation of studentviews. Instead of the prevalenthostile attitude of student leaders,we prefer a more dispassionatemanner of dealing with the Uni¬versity. Students do have theirdifferences with the University, ofwhich the compulsory residence re¬quirements is but one, but we feelthat such differences are betterresolved in a manner befitting anacademic atmosphere.Students and the campusWithin the jurisdiction of Stu¬dent Government, there are anumber of matters which* ought tobe objects of its concern. For ex¬ample, there is a desire for eve¬ning and week-end hours for Bar¬tlett swimming pool. Others wouldlike evening hours for the Harperlibrary periodical reading room.Still others want an improvedcampus bus sendee with a consist¬ent schedule, a greater studentcontrol over- student activities fees,and a well-run and*expanding stu¬dent bookstore, etc., to name afew. Each of these matters, wefeel, will improve our University and make it a better place for allstudents. The University party willinsist that such matters receiveprompt attention in the new Stu¬dent Government.Wc believe that SG should beattentive to the needs of its con¬stituency, and therefore we areurging adoption of a constitutionalamendment for residence represen¬tation. We contend that each dele¬gate can be closer to his constitu¬ency by representing a smallernumber of students, many of whomhe may know personally. The pre¬sent system of electing Collegedelegates “at large” seems tomake ihe Student Governmentneedlessly impersonal and few stu¬dents ever meet their so-called“represent at ives.”Student Government, we hold,should seriously investigate thebasis of complaints questioning thevalue of 1he $20 student activitiesfees. The specific benefits fromthese fees should be well-publi¬cized, and if the services appearinadequate in proportion to theamount accessed, the SG shouldeither seek a reduction of thesefees, or work to effect a tangibleimprovement in student services.We submit that the StudentGovernment should consider thecompulsory residence requirementa serious infringement upon stu¬dent freedom. We question thelogic of undergraduates being com¬pelled to live in University hous¬ing, while those graduates, desir¬ous of living in University housing,sometimes have difficulty in doingso, due to the superficial shortageof such housing. While we cannotpromise to persuade the adminis¬tration to change such a ruling, wenote that the present negative,hostile approach of student lead¬ers has failed miserably, and that students migkt do well to supportnew and positive ways of dealingwith the University. Students nowlack an effective forum for thepresentation of their views, andsuch |K)sitive alternatives may wellfill this gap, consequently bringingto University of Chicago studentsa new role in the University aca¬demy'. that it should not take stands onquestions which do not affect UCstudents in a relationship arisingfrom their status as UC studentsIn this view of Student‘Govern¬ment the Law Student party can¬didates are in essential agreementwith the policies of old PracticalReform organization (PRO), theNSA constitution (Art. 10), thenew University Party (UP> theIRP, and the Law Student associ¬ation (LSA). The latter of whichis recommended to the Universityas a model of such an interest*service group Student Govern¬ment.SECOND, the candidates of theLSP believe it unjust that all olthe fees assessed from each lawstudent for student governmenthave been allocated only to thecentral SG and none of the lawstudent’s fees to their local stu¬dent government—the Law Stu¬dent association. eleba<yetthetinmeofrialthethecotpepresAen<PCthearean;one*10Students and the facultyThe University party considersfaculty support a vital asset forthe student cause, and believesthat such support will be forth¬coming when student leaders em¬phasize academic values. In ac¬cordance with this emphasis, wefavor a Student Government work¬ing consistently on student mat¬ters including the study and ana¬lysis of educational aims, curricu¬lum and orientation programs.Students & the neighborhoodThe problems of the Universityneighborhood directly affect manystudents and indirectly affect all(continued on page 6) Thus, the candidates of the I.SRhold that part, at least, of thefunds presently being assessedfrom each law student for studentgovernment should be allocated tothe Law Student association.These funds would enable theLSA to expand its practical pro¬grams such as the Book exchange,'ihe coffee hours, and its social andeducational events. iIn short, the three candidatesof the LSP stand for responsiblecampus-oriented SG and for aiequitable distribution of part, atleast, of the funds taken from thelaw students.The candidates of the Law Stu¬dent party are: Sheldon Hosen,Richard Kinney, and Carl E.Klotz. (ujIWv(hi1oBhiJoierrStith<PeiO'uJOI}dei7 Fbridoneith<amIR ft* VLATl OHResidence representationWe have advocated residencerepresentation for five years. Theresidence representation amend¬ment, as it is worded, is not acomplele statement of the me¬chanics of implementing residencerepresentation. Only IRP, withyears of experience in this mat¬ter, can fill in the outline thatthe amendment proposes. There¬fore we endorse this amendment,while pointing out that only wecan administer properly this re¬form. be certain that the president istruly- representative of the stu*dent body. <JefreliyAssembly sixe *IRP was the first party to adv o¬cate scaling down the size of SG.This year, it seems, everyone hasdecided to go along with us. Butthe plan to do this which wiljappear on the ballot destroys theoriginal intent of the measuro,that of bringing SG closer to thestudent, so that the student eaAexpress what he wants done atNational Student AssociationIRON GUARD Delegates—5 seatsIRP POLIT UPRobert BergerJohn CicakEliot LandauEarl MillerJames Rosenthal Bob HauserDick JacobsonRonald KayeA1 LevyFrederick Wenger Rick ChesneyLen FriedmanCaryle GeierArthur MacEwanMurray Schacher Ken HeylSteve KleinNed LebowGerald McbeathAnne RankinAlternates—5 seatsIRP POLIT UPChuck GordonLouise HoehlJack JacobsMarc Weinberger Bruce RappaportTerri RayJane SaxeMike WollanRobert Workoff John CulpS. Anne HammondDan ParishSid Wurzburg VacanciesAt present, the majority partycan use the slight advantage ofone or two seals to gain utterdomination of Ihe assembly byfilling vacancies in a minorityparty’s delegation with majorityparty people. This violates the dic¬tates of the electorate, since theyelected the minority party, andintend that its voice be heard. Forthis reason, IRP supports eachparty’s being allowed to fill itsown SG vacancies. this university, and be sure thatSG is paying attention to him.Only when coupled with residencerepresentation can this move bofully effective. pnjlcbude;anU*uibifElection of presidentThe president of the studentbody is the highest office, bothin responsibility and prestige,which a student can hold. Thepresident speaks for all the stu¬dents, and therefore IRP believesthat all the students should havea voice in his election. We supportthe campus wide election of theSG President. Only then will it National StudentassociationIRP endorses USNSA, and be¬lieve it serves a useful purpose inexpresing the opinion of the sUn¬dents of the United States, and inimplementing these opinions tothe greatest extent possible. How¬ever, IRP believes that on thiscampus' NSA’s activities arehindered by too close a connectionto the apron strings of the SGassembly. The assembly had nopower or jurisdiction beyond th?limits of this campus. But NSAdoes. Talking about Upper Voltaon the SG floor is fun, granted,but it doesn’t accomplish any¬thing, and it severely limits thetime that can be spent consider¬ing anything else. If the NSA EqOf:anm<doeabrpaonevcabrotl1Rst<evpeusanstiat\'iar4 • CHICAGO MAR O O N Aipril 11. 1962IG PLATFORM Axelrod PlatformWhatever POLIT may say,4*)WN and ANTI are not irre¬sponsible but rather reflect legiti¬mate dissatisfaction with StudentGovernment. POLIT, since it isihe« controlling party in theGovernment, is to blame for theexistence of these parties. Buteven now most POLIT membersfeel that these people are merelycrackpots.We think that most people, withthe exception of UP, will agreewith the broad, general principlesset forth in POLIT’s platform. Itis a' nice safe platform, given theliberal climate of this University.Tr is the Chicago equivalent ofrunning on a ticket of Mom’sappfe pie and the American flag.We think that something more isrequired. The Student Governmenthas been a private club too long.The representatives stand forelection and then they disappearback into their holes for anotheryear until the next balloting whenthey pop up again with the sametired slogans. Student Govern¬ment has decayed into a smug setof ’self-righteous politicos whohabitually seek the support of'heir professional followers. They(■like no effort to earnestly solicitthe interest and backing of theirconstituents. They do not sendrepresentatives into the Universityresidences to inform the students.A few perfunctory notices are notenoiigh; explanations are required.POITT makes no effort to learnthe sentiments of the people theyare ellegedly representing. Is itany wonder, then, that hardly any¬one, including the administration,•ays much attention to them any¬more ?MfeA Student Government thatCould effectively marshall populartupphrt would be an assembly to«eekon with. That is the firstthing that a governing body shoulddo and it is precisely the thingthat this government has notdonq, This is inevitably a fatalerror. If DOWN does not destroyStudent Government this year,then some future equivalent will.People will simply ignore the{overnment, and it will go away.$ut, for the lime being, who hopejou^vill give it another chance.We further suggest that the stu¬dent body vote “NO” on thef Representation by residence ”referendum. Dormitory represent-Jfeten is obviously intended tobring the student representative(loser to his constituents. What isneeded, however, is a change inthe attitude of the representativeand h change in the type of repre¬ sentation won’t accomplish this. Tnaddition, representation by dormi¬tory will, we think, tend towardparties divided by residence.There will eventually be a Pierceparty, a New dorm party, and aB-J party. This would cloud thegenuine political issues withsectionalism and unnecessarilydivide Student Government.We will constantly try to re¬establish contact between the stu¬dent body and its government,both as individuals and throughgovernment committees. We willtry to see that these committeesrepresent the government as awhole and not just one politicalparty. We hope that they will beable to serve as a means of collec-ting opinions and a way of in¬forming the student body.We are only running in the Col¬ lege and for the National Studentassociation; so we could not, ifelected, constitute a majority. ButMre can promise that we will al¬ways be a burr under the saddleof that moribund mule, StudentGovernment, and the governmentwill be the better for it.There has been some questionabout our cariipaign. Do we reallymean what w'e say? We suggestthat you look carefully at ourposters to see what they mean,not merely at w'hat is printed onthem.Whomever you may vote for, wein the Iron Guard sincerely urgethat you do go out and vote inthis election. More is at stakethan ever before. A large turnoutwill, in itself, suggest that thereis yet hope for Student Govern¬ment. ' ExperiencePresident of Salisbury houseRepresentative to Burton-Jud-son council.PlatformI am running for College repre¬sentative as an independent inolder to have the best opportun¬ity to exercise my own judgementfree of constraining commitments.The University of Chicago haslong been in the lead in the fightfor liberal ideals. Organizationssuch as CORE, the peace groups,and the National Student associa¬tion are proper channels for suchactivities; Student -Governmenthas another function.I believe the role of StudentGovernment is to represent theentire student body. The follow'-ing are means by which studentgovernment can benefit the stu¬dent: Fuller use of campus facilities,for instance by lengthing libraryhours, and improving campus busservice.Expansion of Coop bookstoreto provide continued savings forthe students and competition forthe UC bookstore.Residence representation to pro¬mote responsible student govern¬ment.Encouragement of Universitypublication of preliminary reportson policy changes.Investigation into the alloca¬tion of preliminary reports onpolicy changes.Investigation into the alloca¬tion of the $60 per year “GeneralService Fee.”As new' suggestions to benefitthe student are brought up, I willbe able to deal with them freeof previous commitments in myrole as independent.STUDENT GOVERNMENT ELECTION SLATEANTILarry CostinMartin GorovskyJan M. GraysonBruce D. IrishPatrick D. KrolakMarjorie MundtRobert RodnitzkyGary ShandelsonR. L. StaubitzNicholas TsoulosCharles K. WilsonR. A. WilsonJames Zagel DOWNJudy Shapiro College—19 SeatsIRON GUARDINDEPENDENTRobert Axelrod Charles BergRobert BergerJohn CicakNoel CriscuolaJohn CrothersDwylan R. GearhartEliot A. LandauRichard MaoGeorge MatsuiEarl MillerSteve MoulJames MurphyKiron NerodeJames PierceJohn E. PolingMichael J. RichardsonJames RosenholtzPaul Wolff IRP POLIT UPBill Cruee Pat Chesney Ted ChippsLna Dvorkin Earl Choldin John CulpJill Gerson Sally A. Cook S. Anne HammondChuck Gordon Judy Field Ken HeylPete Harrison Len Friedman James HilgersBob Hauser Caryle Geier Fred HoytJerry Hyman Gene Kadish Steve KleinJack Jacobs Russell Kay Mike KorvickDick Jacobson Paul Levy Ned LebowPaula Lynn Larson Arthur MacEwan Jerry McbeathSam Leinhardt Richard Merbaum Jim MeansA1 Levy Mike Ormond Steve RosenFlip Mason Pamela Procuniar Gary SchuldtCarol Masters Peter Rabinowitz Dorothy SharplessChauncey Jeffries Bruce Rappaport Stan SewartMellor, Til Tend Ray Ken TaylorChris Peebles Jane Saxe Svlvia WoodbyLee Schwarz Mike Wollan Sid WurzburgJon StephensMarc Weinberger Robert Workoff Susan YaegerDOWNFranklin S. Weingarten DIVISIONSBiological sciences—2 seatsPOUTRobert PerlmanMarvin Stodolsky UPKaram BatraBusiness school—3 seatsIRP . UP■ ——Heitry A. Kaplan Hari AlipuriaRichard M. DavidsonU. G. RaoIt?delegation were made separatefront SG, the time of the assemblywould be conserved, and the abi-liy of NSA to accomplish goals^mkl be considerably enlarged,ine campusIRP, of course, supports suchprograms as: 1) the Coop book¬store, 2) student charter flights,buseg, and mule trains; 3) stu¬dent discounts; 4) the Committeeon Grass; 5) better Maroon(which we commend for its re-sumjfaion of daily publication, abig step forward); and 6) O-board.Equally obvious is our disapprovalof: 7) tuition increases; 8) twoand N'our year residence require¬ments; 9) doubling and triplingdormitory rooms; and 10) theearly closing hours of campus li¬braries. However, unlike otherparties, we don’t claim to be theonly party that favors points 1-60M disfavors 7-10. In fact, weeven admit that in one or twocases' wre weren’t the first ones tobring them up. (We wish that theother parties were willing to giveIRP as much credit when theysteal* our planks.) But we supportevery issue on its merits, irres¬pective of its origin (althoughusually they originate with us)and because we believe that thestudent body supports them too.To further the ends outlinedabove, IRP offei's a slate of indi¬viduals — all intelligent, honest,and politically aware — w'ho willvote exactly the way you, the stu-*%Pht, wish them to. POLITKay HodesDOWNG. Wayne KilpatrickLSPSheldon HosenRichard KinneyCarl KlotzANTIMichael G. RaymondDOWNPhil HablutzelJohn HarbesonPatrick MurphyRichard Scbarf Education—1 seatUPRobert J. Egan Divinity school—2 seatsIRPGeorge OshreyGraduate Library school—1 seatUPS. David ThurmanIRPA1 SawyerLaw—3 seatsPOUTRick ChesneyCarol Ruth SilverStephen Wizner Humanities—3 seatsUPRobert AtenAnne RankinRobert Rankin POUTDan KlenbartMark ShafferJoel M. SnyderPOLIT Medical schools—2 seatsUPAlan BraunMichael ShelanskiIRPJan Finder Physical sciences—4 seatsPOLITClark KissingerRichard Larson Paul HofferThomas-FellUPFrank RichardsRichard SumnerMyint Lwin TheinSocial sciences—8 seatsPOLITDavid N. AppelStephen Boyan, JrOliver W. HolmesRon InglehartPat LewisBill RosenthalJulius P. SchlotthauerRachel Schupakivitz UPRobert BartlowJames MarcelyRichard MarkinDaniel S. ParishBill RichterDonald RosenthalJohn W. VincentDOWNJudith Friedman Social Service administration—2 seatsIRP POUTPaul D. Cohen John SchuermanSusan WorkcffApril 11, 1962 • CHICAGO MAROON • 5•>\IM*\V\ PLATFORM PLATFORM(continued from page 4)nection with the University ofChicago or the UC Student Gov¬ernment. It was incoi porated bysix individuals. One of these, JimThomason, was in Student Gov¬ernment at that time and is stillthe prime mover in the Interna¬tional Co-op. DOWN gladly giveshim credit for almost single-handedly making the co-op whatit is today. The International’soffice is in the loop. Its capitalcomes from issuing stock up to$10,000, from membership fees,and from a percentage on bookssold. Several members of DOWNare also co-op members and sup¬port its activities.On each campus where* the co¬op operates, it needs an agent.The agent receives halt the localmembership fees and a percen¬tage on all books sold in order tomeet its operating expenses —overhead and salaries. The agentat the U of C has been StudentGovernment. It could as well beany other organization or person.Some co-op members believe thatsince SG has lost some $200 inits operations, that we should keepSG as the local agent as they havebeen willing to absorb the loss.Others of us content that weshould seek a new -gent who ismore efficient. Even SG admitsthat it could have cut its lossesto some $25. In any event, SGhas not been actually managingthe local co-op since last quarter.An insurgent membership meeting policy), we mention several dis¬advantages that any studentgovernment has:1. It is inevitably controlled bya small minority who, becausethey are willing to neglect theirstudies, think themselves fit tomake pronouncements on univer¬sity, community, national and in¬ternational affairs in the name ofall the students at UC. An ex¬ample would be the recent contro¬versy over the University Realty’srental policy. Whatever one maythink of the policies advocated,however, much fun it was to sleepin President Readies outer of¬fice, however noble it may havebeen to be arrested for trespassingat the University Realty office —there was certainly a wide di¬vergence of view among the stu¬dents on this matter. For mem¬bers of CORE to have done thesethings in their own name wouldnot have pretended that all UCstudents agreed. But for StudentGovernment to help instigate theactions and to pass a resolutionsupporting them, did make suchpretentions. Since SG has foryears been unable to resist mak¬ing such pretentions, DOWN ad¬vocates its abolition.2. tn addition to lack of func¬tions and bad conduct, SG coststhe students money. We think theUniversity could better spend thismoney for scholarships. IIP(continued from page 4)students; and we therefore reasonthat SG should assume an activerole in the affairs of the neighbor¬hood. Student’s active participa¬tion in such affairs of the neigh¬borhood (e.g. discussion groups,civic projects, etc.) could, we feel,prove an effective step in further¬ing the Hutchins concept of a“Community of Scholars.”The Congress of RacialEqualityCORE, we feel, has served auseful function in bringing thematter of the University housingpractices to the fore, and in win¬ning assurances of non-discrimina¬tion for all University students.The University party, however,cannot condone the tactics used byCORE (and approved by StudentGovernment!, and feel that suchtactics only increase the dillicultyof effecting thoughful resolutionof student problems.We also regret the efforts tobelittle one of the few truly con¬structive efforts to achieve stableneighborhood integration. Thisprogram has already suggestedthat white people will not neces¬sarily move when Negroes livenext door, and in time the HydePark community should be one ofthe strongest arguments for in¬tegration yet advanced. CORE wants integration “now!" but suchimpatience, if implemented, couldivite' another Negro ghetto inwhich the Negro would again bethe chief victim, not to mentionthe possibility of the demise ofthe University itself. Such a cala¬mity would simply provide moreammunition for the segregation¬ists. who could say, “It didn’twork at UC either.”We applaud the faculty reporton the neighborhood program, andencourage the University and theHyde Park-Ken wood conference tocontinue their program for an ef¬fective integration of the Univer¬sity community.Students and the NationalStudent associationThe University party finds it re¬grettable that the NSA, with itsfine record in such programs asbook exchanges, housing arrange¬ments for visiting students, aca¬demic freedom, scholarships, loans,etc., must be weakened by med¬dling in partisan politics. NSA ful¬fills an imj>ortant mission, and wecan only attribute the increasingnumber of schools withdrawingfrom NSA. along with its loss ofmuch popular support, to NSA’sdisregard limited to student mat¬ters. We hope to improve NSAby encouraging a renewed empha¬sis upon academic values, and ade-emphasis ujK>n matters of ques¬tionable relevance. Students and the worldObjective observers generallyagree that the University of Chi¬cago Student Government does notyet run the world, and that is un¬likely that it ever will. According¬ly, the University party favors asomewhat more “realistic” juris¬diction for Student Government,vis. the University vicinity.We do emphasize, however, thatstudents are world citizens; andwe advocate that the Student Gov¬ernment assume non-partisan edu¬cational responsibilities on nationaland international matters. Wepropose that outstanding speakersand forums be sponsored on cam¬pus to present various perspectiveson such topics. Cooperation withthe US State department wouldbe one possibility in securing suchspeakers. It is our belief that suchprograms would engender an evenmore enlightened interest in worldproblems, and also enhance thestanding of our Student Govern¬ment and University.We further encourage a moreeffective student travel programto afford opportunities for stu¬dents to visit other nations, em¬phasizing careful arrangementsand service features for such trav¬els. Publicizing hostels and dis¬count facilities, and providingEastern European tours would beexamples of such possibilities.l'OLIT PLATFORMwas successful in vesting mana¬gerial control in a local co-opexecutive board, elected from themembership, and completely in¬dependent of SG. Under the newmanagement, the local co-op hasfinally begun to show a profit.If SG were abolished, as we hope,the main problem of the localco-op would be to find a newagent willing to accept the profitsfrom what is now ap rofitableenterprise.2. Student flights.. The secondhalf of our proposed amendment,which was not printed in lastFriday’s .Maroon, reads: “All un¬committed funds in possession ofthe Student Government at theabove date will be turned backto the University of Chicago Ac¬tivities Office.” Of course, themoney now tied up in this sum¬mer’s student flights are “com¬mitted funds,” and hence theflights will not be endangeredby abolishing Sp. As for futureflights and other discount travelplans, this is precisely the kind ofthing for which the student co¬op exists.3. We have no disagreementwith students who have their ownviews on howr best to integrateHyde Park. We recommend themto CORE where they may speakand act in their own name, andnot in the name of all the U ofC students.4. We have no disagreementwith students who believe thatPeace may be obtained by march¬ing to Washington. We recom¬mend them to the Student Peaceunion.5. We have no disagreementwith students who wish to getexperience in politics. We recom¬mend them to the Fifth WardDemocratic organization, the FifthWard Republican organization,the Independent Voters of Illi¬nois, the Democratic Federation ofIllinois, and the present Aldermanwho will all welcome their serv¬ices and offer them more practi¬cal experience than is ever avail¬able in SG.6. We have no disagreementwith students who wish to debateand discuss all the issues of na¬tional and world politics. Werecommend them to the UC For¬ensic association.7. We have no disagreementwith students, no matter howstrange their ideas. We recom¬mend them to the Science Fictionclub.8. The last remaining functionthat SG seems to perform is toprovide its own members withneeded emotional support.. Werecommend psychotherapy.HI. In addition to the fact thatSG perform no necessary func¬tion, and indeed can not since ithas no actual power to determineUniversity policy (or anyone else’s (continued from page 4)ministration are in sore need ofreevaluation. POLIT feels that theDisciplinary Committee as pre¬sently organized is unsatisfactory.It has no set schedule of punish¬ments, and often the punishmentsit hands down are unrealistic.Much of the dissatisfaction withthe committee stems from thefact that the Dean of Studentscan override its decisions. Iffurther power (and perhaps finalauthority I were given the DC. itmight be able to act in a moreeffective manner. POLIT will con¬tinue the present program ofstudent observers in the DC untilstudents are more acquainted withthe workings of the committee.At such time the student bodymay be offered representation onthe DC. POLIT feels that thisstep could only be taken afterthe student body has approved itby referendum.POLIT feels that many adminis¬tration-imposed regulations areentirely out of place in, and notin the spirt of, a true universitycommunity. POLIT is against theresidence requirement and willcontinue its efforts to convincethe administration that such aresriction should not exist in auniversity. Similarly. POLIT w'illcontinue its campaign againsthours restrictions forewomen liv¬ing in dormitories, and against thepunishment (often as high assuspension) for violation of theserestrictions.Academic punishmentPOLIT believes the University’suse of the threat of suspensionin order to end the sit-ins is anunwarranted use of the power ofacademic punishment. We areconcerned lest this become a pre¬cedent. Academic penalties shouldnot be imposed for non-academicoffenses. The suspension threatalso raises the question of theUniversity’s power to regulate thepolitical activities of students, apower denied it by the StudentBill of Rights. A POLIT Govern¬ment will work writh the Univer¬sity administration to define afirm policy.POLIT is aware that the cur¬rent hours of the Universitylibrary are insufficient for theneeds of many students. Thisyear's POLIT Government hasapproached library officials aboutthis matter and has received en¬couragement from them that,funds permitting, the library willbe open longer. A POLIT Govern¬ment continue it service to thestudent body by working to havethe library open later at nightand earlier on Sundays.POLIT holds the student tostudent orientation, includingquestions of educational policyand theory, independently planned and executed by an interested andcapable student group, is an in¬valuable portion of education. ThePOLIT SG worked actively torepresent the students’ desire forthe restoration of the Orientationboard. We are pleased writh DeanWick’s action in restoring O-boardto its traditional role.A POLIT Government w'ill re¬quest the Administration to hireanother serving force so that animproved C-Shop with better foodat lower prices will again be openfor the midday meal.Student-Faculty CenterA POLIT Government will pressfor the construction of a Student-Faculty center to provide a placefor relaxation and gathering forthe University community. Sucha center would include diningfacilities, meeting rooms, lounges,recreation facilities, and auditori¬ums for lectures and musical andtheatrical events, and would alsocontain office facilities for theDean of Students’ staff and stu¬dent organizations.POLIT supports the formationof the Student Committee forCommunity Cooperation under thesponsorship of David Bakan.POLIT believes that volunteerstudent participation in commun¬ity life is both necessary and de¬sirable. Such contact and activityis valuable to both the individualsparticipating and to the improve¬ment of the whole community.A POLIT Government will assistin publicizing opportunities forstudent volunteers in such activi¬ties as elementary school tutoringand recreational and cultural pro¬grams in under-privileged areasof the community.ACTIONA re-elected POLIT Governmentwill continue its sponsorship ofpolitical education lectures suchas the showing of “OperationAbolition” and discussion ofHUAC, the debate on “Integrationor Separation,” and the plannedlecture by James Hoffa.The POLIT SG worked activelywith CORE on the sit-ins pro¬testing the University's housingpolicy. Over a year ago ground¬work w'as laid setting up a groupto investigate the situation. Thesit-ins called nation- wide atten¬tion to the blatant discriminationof the University and caused theadministration to reconsider itspolicy. A POLIT Government willcontinue to represent the studentbody on the University-Communitycommittee. We agree with therecommendation of the Univer¬sity’s Faculty Committee on Rent¬al Policies “that the Universityshould recognize that its commu¬nity objectives can more effective¬ly be achieved in the long run if the city as a whole and, in fact,the metropolitan area as a wholeis open to Negro occupancy.”Since^its inception, POLIT hassupported the Student NonviolentCoordinating committee whichgrew out of the Southern sit-inmovement and is currently con¬ducting a voter-registration drive.The POLIT Government partici¬pated in creating an organizationto cooperate specifically withSNCC. Almost $2000 was raisedand sent to SNCC.DisarmamentPOLIT believes that the threatof nuclear war is the most seriousproblem of our day. Because ofthis, POLIT feels that it is bothits responsibility and the responsi¬bility of all students to (l) makethemselves aware of the issuesaffecting war and peace, and (2»work in ways which will makepossible those changes in Ameri¬can policy which, we believe, canhelp bring about disarmament.Toward these ends POLIT hasalready sponsored discussions onsuch topics as Germany and Ber¬lin. and has actively supportedthe February 3962 WashingtonPeace March. POLTT’s futureplans include further educationalactivities, participation in theEaster Peace Walk in Chicago,and support for other peace activi¬ties. POLIT will take whateveraction is necessary to encouragethe University to offer specialcourses on peace and disarma¬ment. „A POLIT Government will con¬tinue the recently initialed cultu¬ral exchange program with Khar¬kov State university, USSR,which is part of a new' universityto university exchange programbetween US and Soviet schools.POLIT in the NationalStudent associationPOLIT welcomes the develop¬ment of liberal student politicalactivity in the United ’States, andbelieves that the United StatesNational Student association canlake a leadership role if its mem¬ber schools provide the associationW'ith experienced and capabledelegations. The POLIT slate forthe UC delegation to NSA isthe only one with the experienceand capabilities needed to imple¬ment its stands and help pro¬vide leadership for NSA.POLIT continues to be a strongadvocat of abolition of the Housecommittee on un-American ac¬tivities and a supporter of in¬creased civil liberties. POLIT 1)opposes the McCarran Registra¬tion and Smith acts, both ofwhich endanger the civil libertiesof all Americans, and 2) will takeall possible action to encourageopposition to the continued exis¬tence of these laws. The POLIT delegation at the last NSA con¬gress took a leading role in ob¬taining passage of legislationcalling for the abolition ot HI ACand condemning the film “Oper-ation Abolition.”A POLIT NSA delegation willurge the National Student con¬gress to call for the Tevocationof all existing bans on travel >and the defeat of pending legis¬lation authorizing censorship ofboth foreign and domestic mail. »Such bans, as well as locally in¬spired bans on speakers, consti¬tute a crippling obstruction to the iefforts of students to keep them¬selves objectively informed.Peace corpsPOLIT opposes the develop¬ment of a political Peace corpswhich is designed to act as anarm of the cold war. However,we support the effort to make thePeace corps an organization tohelp improve the social and econo¬mic conditions of underdevelopedcountries. To create such a Peacecorps it is imperative that nodisclaimer affidavit be included asa part of the Peace corps applecatipn.A POLIT NSA delegation willattempt at the 15th National Stu¬dent congress to have NSA affili¬ate with Turn Toward Peace, agroup established to coordinatepeace activity in the US. TurnTow'ard Peace now includes such *organization as SANE, UAW, andSPU. •The POLIT delegation will pressfor the formal affiliation ot NSAwith the Student Non-violent ,Coordinating committee. SNC’Chas requested NSA to become anaffiliate in -orded to demonstrate ^the nationwide support for studentefforts to eliminate discrimination.The POLIT NSA delegation willurge the 15th Congress to passlegislation 1) encouraging studentsto take active interest in the prob¬lems of urban renewal in theirareas, 2l favoring the formationof a cabinet post for Urban ^Affairs, and 3) supporting openoccupancy legislation.A POLIT NSA delegation willencourage NSA to accept the pro-^posal of the Committee on YouthOrganizations of the USSR thatthe two national student unionsbegin an extensive program ofcultural exchange.Aid to educationThe delegation will favorfederal aid to education on alllevels and for all necessary ex-^penditures, including support, ofteachers’ salaries. Federal con¬trols such as loyalty oaths anddisclaimer affidavits should l>celiminated. JA POLIT delegation will urgeNSA to sponsor the ISCU andhelp spread the Coop’s servicesto all men ber schools.t • CHICAGO MAROON • April II. 1942Bureaucrat vs teacher With Peace corps(continued from page 1)ment, and all the rest of whatp„>s on in the university is irrele¬vant,” he said. The student teach-er relationship is both personaland erotic - "personal because thestudent must learn and the teach-pr must teach; erotic because thesiudent has needs and the teachermi)st take an interest in thesenwds.”To the student, said Goodman,teacher show that the life of learn¬ing can be done because they didit; and to do it they had to havethe “moral courage of scholars.”He said that the loyally trials inCalifornia in the 1950’s hadbrought this lesson home to manyteachers.In addition the teacher is autho¬rity in the world. “Our scholarsarc rather bad that way; exceptfor the physical sciences professorsdo not play -a large role in theworld.”The University is a foreign en¬clave in the city or the state. Itspeaks its own language. The aca¬ demic evidence of the university isdiferent from that of the TV orradio."It is this foreignness of theschool which we are losing. Oncethe school begins to fly the Amer¬ican flag it ceases to be a com¬munity of scholars. For scholar¬ship ig international.”In addition Goodman said, "theorthodoxy of scholars is graduallycoming under the surveilance ofstate and other bureaucrats.There is a conflict of interest be¬tween the community of scholarsand higher level of administra¬tion.” «As an example Goodman saidthat Columbia “University spentfive times as much money in edu¬cational administration as on edu¬cation itself.” UC grad in ColumbiaA UC graduate, AlbertWahrhaftig, is currentlyworking as a Peace corpsvolunteer on a remote SouthAmerican coffee plantation.Wahrhaftig, who received hisMA in anthropology from UC in1960, is trying to organize andcarry out projects to improve liv¬ing conditions in Manaure, Col¬ombia. A health center, a schoolfor students beyond the thirdgrade, an aquaduct, and electricalfacilities are the four thingsneeded most by this small town,New postal outlookWork on center begunGroundbreaking ceremoniestook place Wednesday to markthe Iteginning of constructionof an addition to the threemillion dollar development of theChicago Osteopathic center at52nd Street and Ellis.Present were UC PresidentGeorge Beadle; R. N. MacBain,president of the Chicago Osted-pathic center; Floyd Peckham,president of the board of the Chi¬cago Osteopathic hospital and col-iego; and Chicago’s mayor, Rich¬ard Daley. (continued from page 1)trative problems involved in en¬forcement would be so substantia]as to raise serious doubts as toits legality and efficacy."4 It is inconsistent with thetradition of an open society which has characterized the history ofthis country and which the firstamendment to the constitutionreflects."5. It is apt to do substantialinjury to the international objec¬tives of the United States.” which is located betw’een SantaMarta and Cucta.Wahrhaftig is one of 62 Peacecorps volunteers now in Colombiadoing such things as drilling wells,laying w;ater and sewage lines,planning school vegetable gardensand playgrounds, building roadsand bridges, teaching the use ofnew farm implements, and stock¬ing ponds with food fish.Wahrhaftig prepared for thePeace corps assignment in aneight-week training program atRutgers university in New Bruns¬wick, New Jersey. This was fol¬lowed by an orientation course atthe Rockefeller Foundation’s Tib-aitita institute near Bogota. Theprogram he is participating in isadministered jointly by the Peacecorps and CARE in cooperationwith the Division of CommunityAction of the government ofColombia. —.Colombian President Alberto Lleras Camargo has called thePeace coips "the finest way inwhich the United States couldprove to the humble people ofthis and other lands that the pri¬mary purpose of its internationalaid program is to build a betterlife in all of the free world's vil¬lages and neighborhoods.”The Peace corps, which was oneyear old in March, now has 787volunteers working in 13 count¬ries. Some 2,400 are expected 1obo in training or overseas by June,and 5,000 by the end of August.Automobile reminderStudents who are operatingautomobiles on campus thisquarter and who have notturned in their auto permits byFriday, will automatically beassessed a $10 penalty fee attheir next registration.Today's Events | |.rfrfr>,r„,r COMING APRIL 13ART PRINT AND RECORD SALEFor Two Weeks OnlyBigger and better than ever before. New subjects inprints, bagains in records. Come early f6r the bestselections.University of Chicago Bookstore5802 ELLIS AVENUE The life insurance you didn't buymay not cost you anything. Butthink of what it could cost yourfamily! Make sure you haveenough life insurance.Call: Ralph 1. Wood, Jr„ '481 N. LaSalleFR 2-2390 Chicago. IllinoisFA 4-6800SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADALrclur# aeries: iCraduivtc school of bim-ineM<), “World events as seen fromPari*,” Joan Bdiard, oniuut-1 g*n-of Fiance, 1 :S« pm, bunnc-Mcant.Meeting: futility of the divinity school,3 |,m. Swift common room.Lecture: "The Role of labor in socialchange.” 3 |,m. Ida Noyes hall, CarlSihoiw, HAW trade-unionist, SP-SI)F member (YPSL).Oitanography lecture: (Peimrtment ofKcophysical science), "The densityand diversity of deep sea heiinhoniefaunas.” 3:30 pm, Rosenwald 26.Howard Sanders. marine bioJogint,Woods Hole Oceanographic insti-l ution.Seminar: "The social structure of thecollege and the development ofcharacter,” 3:30 pm. Law schoolauditorium; John Noonan, Paul Uood-man. Seymour Upset; Joseph J.Schwab, William Rainey Harper, pro-lessor of Natural Science (Collette)and professor in the department ofeducation: Meyer Isenbersr, associateprofeasor of humanities in the Col¬lide.Lecture series: (Committee on researchin Africa and the Near East), "TheArab Near East in the Period ofWesternization,” 3:30 pm, socialscience 122, Mr. Hourani.Carillon recital: 5 pm. Rockefellermemorial chapel, Daniel Robins, uni-versity rarillonneur.Motion picture: (Pre-Med club). "HandtrWe Trust: The Making of a Sur-renn.” 5 run. Billinas Ml 37.Episcopal evensong: Bond chapel, 5:05pm.Lecture forum: "Divine grace and de-mythologitsing,” 7:30 pm. Chapelhouse. Reverend J. Preston Cole,methodist chaplain. UC.Science fiction club: "United or Un¬done: will you be citizens of theworld state?” Ida Noyes hall, 8 pm.* minar:. “Medieval Iranian politicaltheory,” 8 pm. social sciences #02;A. K. S. Lambton. school of Orien¬tal and African studies. UniversityOf London. * * *!urf,; (Craduate library school dub),I he early history of Cambridge uni¬versity library (1400-1600).” 8 pm.International house home room. J.( T. Oates, staff member, Cambridgeuniversity library, England.Lecture: "The limits of a general edu¬cation.” X:30 pm. Rockefeller chapel,Robert Maynard Hutchins, formerchancellor of the University of Chi¬cago and President of the Fund forthe Republic.REMEMBER:for service,foreign carhospitalSOME Connecticut Democratsi have formed a committee to helpdbe Ribicojf win the Democraticnomination for the Senate, ex¬plaining that Rihicoff can't cam¬paign actively because of bisI responsibilities? as Secretary ofI Health, 'Education and Welfare.| Maybe, even Mr* «,n*n» i„j *1 would beNATIONALRCVIIa Conflict 0^1 Writ* far fraa cojLinterest?” Salem refreshes your taste_"ajr-sgftens" every puffCicalcd by K. J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanyJust as springtimereawakens you to the beauty and soft greenness all around... so *every Salem reawakens and softly refreshes your taste. Salem, withall its rich tobacco taste, is a gentle, easy-going smoke. Special High #Porosity paper “air-softens” every puff, so that more than ever, Salemgives you the freshness of springtime. Smoke refreshed... smoke Snlem1 * menthol freshrich tobacco tastemodern filter, tooApril 11, 1U2 • CHICAGO MAROON • 7I .Study on civil defenseat Harvard commences Scientist joins UC facultyA South-Atnerican bio-physicist has been appointed to the University of Chicago’sfaculty.ClassifiedFor Rent and For SaleCAMBRIDGE, Mass. —A civil defense officer hasbeen appointed for Harvarduniversity to study the prob¬lems involved in protecting thefaculty and students of the schoolin case of nuclear attack.The new officer will be respon¬sible for recommending a feasiblecourse for the university to followin line with the preliminary con¬clusions of a 12 man committeewhich considered the problems ofcivil defense.The first step will be a more ex¬tended and thorough study of theuniversity’s physical capabilitiesby the department of buildings andgrounds. This will be used by thecivil defense officer to make rec¬ommendations for protective meas¬ures.The appointment of an adminis¬trative official in the universitywith responsibility for planningand directing a civil defense pro¬gram under the guidance of thepresident of the university wasone of the recommendations of theuniversity committee.In making its recommendations,the university committee ex¬pressed its view that, since thefederal shelter program as pres¬ently envisaged appears to be along-term effort, Harvard’s owncivil defense activities can andshould be carefully planned beforeany considerable effort by the uni¬versity is initiated. by the university could be of ap¬preciable benefit in case of an at¬tack with large nuclear weaponsdirectly on metropolitan Boston.Similarly ,the report found it dif¬ficult to plan against hits of thiskind on targets peripheral to themetropolitan Boston area.The report recommended, how¬ever that the university initiatea modest program to provide pro¬tection against the fallout whichwould follow a nuclear attack ontargets at some distance frommetropolitan Boston, or the acci¬dental detonation of a nuclearweapon. Events of this kind mightrelease fallout in such quantitiesas to be lethal or highly dangerousto unsheltered persons, but muchless harmful, or harmless, to per¬sons in adequate shelter.The committee found that ex¬tensive areas of space exist withinthe university suitable for use asfallout shelters. Shelter space de¬veloped in Harvard facilities, ofcourse, would be available up tothe limit of capacity to anyone inthe nearby vicinity. Humberto Fern&ndez-Moran, 38, an authority on the use of the electron microscope toprobe ultra-fine structure of living things, will be professor of biophysics and will beginteaching and research at UC on July 1, 1962.Born in Venezuela in 1924, Fernandez-Moran was educated there and abroad.He received his AB degree horn condUion approaching their hy- Since 1958, when FernandoT-drated state. Moran came to the United States.This technique has made it pos- he bas P°s*s Massachu-11UI11 sible to examine directly solutions sett® Institute of cchnology; Har-the University of Caracas in 1945 of the deoxyribonucleic acid, which 'ar General hosnftaV Massachu*and a Ph.D. in biophysics from originates in the nucleus of the s 'p tal’Stockholm in cell and which carries hereditary He speaks several languages flu.instructions. » ently and has published his re-Fernandez-Moran is a former search in five languages: Spanish,head of the department of bio- Swedish. German, French andphysics at the University of Car-Schulgeneinde Wickersdorf, Ger¬many, in 1939; he has two M D de¬grees - from the University ofMunich, Germany, in 1944; fromthe University ofSweden, in 1952.Fernandez-Moran is widelyknown for his contributions toelectron microscopy, the investi¬gative technique which employs acas; and founder-director of thebeams of electrons to probe be- Venezuelan Institute for Neurolo-yond the limits of the light micro¬scope and observe objects mea¬sured in millionths of an inch,said H. Stanley Bennett, dean of gy and Brain Research. English.CORE issues newsletterThe first issue of what i>end.The institute is devoted to bio- planned as a “monthly newsphysical and medical research, review serving all groups enthe division of biological sciences ^7 derived from^nudea^phys^cs. JKhts” wa^nub^shfd1 tl^!lt TTr- ' mathematics and chemistry. Be- ght s P b hed this weok'innovations sides holding numerous otherscientific positions, Fernandez-Mo¬ran has held appointments as is compiled and distributed by thesue for study under the electron scientific and cultural attache to South Side branch of the Congresmicroscope. He has developed vac- the legations of Venezuela In Swe- of Racial Equality (CORE); how -num-tight chambers making it den, Norway, and Denmark. 1947- ever, it is not the official voice olpossible to examine cellular mate- 54, and as minister of education any organization and will not con-rials at the molecular level, in a of Venezuela 1958. tain any editorial opinion.at UC.Fernandez-Moran’sinclude instruments used to cutultrathin sections of biological tis- The Civil Rights News Reviewlively Maiytyn Prosser, PoMona ’64The committee report said noprogram likely to be undertakenHouse for Sale — South ShoreSpacious, attractive, convenient. Fourbedrooms. 2 baths, garage and car port,full basement, remodeled kitchen. 3Mocks to excellent public elementaryand high schools. Pleasant familyneighborhood. 5% interesi — 22 yearloan. 5 modern appliances — 3 airconditioners included in this price.Mid 20’s, MI 3-8032,Sleeping rooms available reasonablerent, convenient to campus. Kitchenprivileges. Must be used to childrenand pets. DO 3-1941.Rooms for rent: 54th and Dorchester.FA 4-0213. kitch. priv., privacy. $14week.2-3 room furnished and unfurnishedapartments available now. Near 57 thand Dorchester. $85-$90. HY 3-2525.Wanted and ServicesLost outside Bursar's Thurs. Aft., $100.WO 4-1584.Typing: reasonable, rapid. accurate.Special Rush service. Call Rona Rosen¬blatt or Karen Borchers, NO 7-3609.Ride wanted in June to Alaska. CallMU 4-2272 between 11 pm and 8:30am any time,PersonalsBe sociable — have an Aardvark! Buyit at the Bookstore, Book Nook, orWoodworth’s. Lively Omi: Marylyn Prosser, Sophomore Homecoming Princess at Pomona College, Claremont, California, and the new Galasie 500/XL SunliaerREMEMBER:for sales,foreign carsales lives it cp with this lively One I¥omForo ’62: the New Cjalaxie 500/AI!RUSSIA ANDEASTERN EUROPE56 days $130940Trip includes Holland, Germany,Denmark, Sweden. Finland. Russia,Poland, Czechoslovakia. Hungary,Austria, Yugoslavia. Italy, France,Switzerland. England.56 days in Europe. Leave June 27on Dutch Gov’t Student Sailing.Return Sept, 10 by ship or Aug. 31by Air.Small group. Space limited. $1309.40all-expense. Write for FREE details.Other Europe trips from $980 forstuden*s only. From $1,035 for allages.JOHN STOCKSTRAVEL SERVICE5801 ELLIS (Administration 8ldq.)Midway 3-0800, Extension 3496-7-8 This blonde, blue-eyed Lively One counts tennis, shrimp,curry, and the sizzling new Ford Galaxie 500/XL among herpet likes. The built-for-action XL features a tasty new interiorwith cushy bucket seats and a Thunderbird-type console ...sheer live-it-up luxury! And there's go with a capital “gee”CHICAGO MAROON • Ajpril 11, 19*2 from a fiery Thunderbird 405-hp V-8, linked to a quick-acting4-speed stick shift. Choose the gleaming hard¬top or the sun-soaking convertible. See all theLively Ones at your Ford Dealer’s... the liveliest ( OorcC^)place in town, motor companttv t,