THE UNIVERSITY OFCHICAGO 9 EECOEDAN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF FACULTIES VOLUME I, NUMBER 2THE STATE CONTENTS / December 27, 1967OF THE UNIVERSITY1 The State of The UniversityBy George W. Beadleby George W. Beadle7 Committee on Nepotism Report8 Committee on Meetings Report10 Advisory Report Committees11 Advisory Committees12 New Faculty Appointments13 Visiting Faculty Appointments14 Retirements14 In Memoriam14 Visiting Committees1 7 Moore Sculpture17 Calendar of Events,December 20 — January 31Because confusion and misunderstanding mayotherwise result, it is important from time to timeto reexamine the purposes of the University and itsmanner of operation.For a variety of reasons this is, I believe, such atime. Unease is widespread in the nation and beyond — about the war in Vietnam, about culturallyand materially underprivileged fellow men, and particularly about our seeming inability to discoverand take effective corrective measures against theseand other social ills.What are appropriate responses for universities?What about this particular university?Obviously the extension, dissemination, and useof knowledge and understanding are basic objectives. In the pursuit of these we recognize the necessity of freedom of inquiry, communication, anddissent on the part of all members of the community, academic and other. Or perhaps it would bemore nearly correct to say that this is a concepteasy to accept in principle but difficult to apply withcomplete consistency in actual situations.A recent issue of the Maroon recalled that Berkeley students demonstrated disruptively against theUniversity's ban of on-campus recruiting by certainnon-university organizations approved by some students. Later,- many of the same students similarlydemonstrated in protest to the University's failureto ban recruitment on campus by other non-university organizations to which the students objected— positions on both sides seemed to lack the virtues of both logic and consistency.The problem is not new. More than four centuries ago Thomas Cranmer, Fellow of Jesus College,Cambridge, and later first Archbishop of Canterbury, was responsible for the burning at the stakeof one Joan Bocher who was charged with and convicted for heresy. Later Cranmer suffered the samefate, also for heresy. To Cranmer, his freedom ofconscience, belief and expression was justified. ButJoan's was not.The student demonstrations against two Chicagobanks last year, and pressure on the University to withdraw its accounts from these banks in protestto their membership in a consortium lending moneyto South Africa because of its racial policy, represent a more subtle problem of a related kind, for ifthe University were to take a corporate position onsuch matters, freedom of dissent would suffer serious compromise. Last spring a special committee,chaired by Professor Harry Kalven of the LawSchool, examined this general question, and wrotea report which the Academic Council voted unanimously to circulate to faculty members and students. It was published in the University Recordissued on November 3. I hope you have studied it.The Committee's report amplifies and clarifies apolicy that has been recognized and followed by theUniversity from its earliest years. In 1899 the "Congregation" of the University unanimously resolved:1. That the principle of complete freedom ofspeech on all subjects has from the beginning beenregarded as fundamental in The University of Chicago, as has been shown both by the attitude of thePresident and the Board of Trustees and by theactual practice of the President and the professors.2. That this principle can neither now nor at anyfuture time be called in question.13. That it is desirable to have it clearly understood that the University, as such, does not appearas a disputant on either side upon an public question ; and that the utterances which any professormay make in public are to be regarded as representing his opinions only.I believe it is fair to say that students in thisUniversity have always enjoyed equal rights of non-disruptive dissent and protest. Whether justified ornot, student opinion should, I firmly believe, contribute to the educational process, and should beresponded to appropriately. Disruptive demonstrations may also contribute something to the educational process, but the lesson they teach is that theemotional climate they create is inimical to constructive educational exchange. This, in addition toother obvious reasons, is why they cannot be defended or tolerated in a university such as this.The Role of the Private UniversityLet me now say a word about the special role ofprivate universities. In many respects we in theUnited States are blessed with by far the strongestsystem of higher education in the world. I am convinced it is so in large part because it is a dual system of state-supported and private universities —both components made stronger by the competitionfor excellence between them. I believe there aretrends that now preferentially favor tax-supporteduniversities. Costs of education at all levels are rising at unprecedented rates, and state universitiesseem better able than their private counterparts tomeet them.One factor is that Federal support for physical facilities, given on a matching basis, can be qualifiedfor by tax dollars by a state university or college —tax dollars matching tax dollars — while in privateuniversities, private dollars are required. In addition, Federal agencies have been directed to takegeographical factors into consideration in makinggrants to institutions of higher learning — to spreadsupport more evenly. They seem to be doingit. I do not make a value judgment on these policies. I report them and consider some of theconsequences. Let me illustrate by trends reportedrecently in Science magazine. If one considers National Science Foundation (NSF) fellowships bystates relative to population and awarded solely onthe basis of merit, six states have a disproportionately high number. Forty-two of the remainingforty-four are low. Obviously, the six are relativelyvery high. They are: Massachusetts, Connecticut,New Jersey, Illinois, Wisconsin and California. Forthe six high states, NSF research grants are lowrelative to fellows. But for all forty-two low states, grants are high relative to fellows. This clearly indicates the leveling trend that tends to make alluniversities equally good. Or, if one prefers to stateit differently, it is a factor that tends to make themequally undistinguished.If we consider the distribution of the top twelveuniversities, according to the 1965 American Council on Education ratings, ten are in the six states Ihave named. Seven of the ten are private. The University of Chicago is the only one of these sevenprivate universities between the Appalachians andthe Rocky Mountains. Can we continue to play thiskind of leadership role? It is a role which, I shouldadd, is equally evident in areas other than science.There is wide consensus that we must— that any lessthan leadership in quality and independence is untenable in our context. The so-called Profile prepared for the Ford Foundation three years ago isbased on this contention. As you will recall, it examined in detail, and critically, all aspects of theUniversity from 1950 to 1965, and projected developments and needs for the ten-year period 1965-1975.Where do we stand now relative to those projections? I believe it is fair to say we are approximately on target or ahead in most respects, andhave continued to gain strength on most fronts. Letme quickly summarize in terms of trustees, faculty,officers, students, facilities, and finances.Two Trustees were elected since the last reportto the Senate: James W. Button, Vice-President ofSears, Roebuck & Company, an alumnus; andJoseph Regenstein, Jr., Chairman of the Board ofArvey Corporation.I doubt if any university in the nation has abetter Board of Trustees.During the past year the faculty increased innumber from 986 to 1,032. This is somewhat aheadof projection. Significant new appointments havebeen made in almost all academic areas of theUniversity. Since these are listed in the November3 issue of the University Record, I shall not namethem here. Recently, special memorial services wereheld for those in the University who died duringthe past twelve months.The list of awards, prizes, degrees, and otherrecognitions of faculty excellence is so long andthe honors so diverse that it is impossible to recountthem here. I could not, in any event, give you acomplete list, for many recipients do not reportthem. We are justifiably proud of each honor.During last year's Seventy-fifth Anniversary, onrecommendation of the faculties, forty-three honorary degrees were awarded to distinguished scholarsof many nations and in many fields.2The two new academic departments authorizedlast year are now in full operation: Far EasternLanguages and Civilizations; and South Asian Languages and Civilizations.Several interdisciplinary academic centers havebeen formed or strengthened in their programs.These include the Center for International Studies; and the Center for Middle Eastern Studies,which, along with other areas of the University, willbenefit by the proximity of the Adlai StevensonInstitute for International Affairs, now headquartered in Robie House. The Center for ComparativeStudy of Political Development is now in itssecond year and is operating effectively.The Graduate School of Business InternationalStudies Program, in cooperation with the LondonSchool of Economics and the University of Louvain,is well underway, with some thirty-five students.The Center for Policy Study has completed itstwo cumulative conferences on China, and the two-volume proceedings are at The University of Chicago Press. This year the Center will sponsor conferences on The Urban Environment.The number of students working with the Committee on Information Sciences continues to grow.The Institute for the Study of Metals haschanged its name to the James Franck Institute, notonly to honor a distinguished and beloved formerfaculty member, but also because the work of theInstitute has moved away from conventional metallurgy toward solid state physics and other physico-chemical-biological phenomena.Turning to Urban Studies, the University's longtime interest in its environment now finds expression in a number of ways. These include the activities of the Center for Urban Studies and the newlyformed Woodlawn Child Health Center, operatedby the Pediatrics Department. The Department ofPsychiatry, in collaboration with the Illinois Department of Health, participates in the WoodlawnMental Health Center.The Center for Studies in Criminal Justice of theLaw School, through its office on Forty-seventhStreet in the Grand Boulevard section, studies juvenile problems and gives legal advice. The DivinitySchool's program of training for the ministry emphasizes work in the inner city and requires actual fieldtraining in Woodlawn and similar areas. The Graduate School of Education is collaborating withWoodlawn community leaders and the Chicago Public School System in formulating and implementinga major project of improvement in several demonstration schools of District 14, which includes Woodlawn.The School of Social Service Administration has proposed a Social Services Center at InglesideAvenue and Sixty-first Street, where certain publicservice agencies will be housed, and where studentswill supplement their training by serving the equivalent of medical internships and residencies. SWAPstudents provide tutoring services to Woodlawnchildren. A medical students organization wasformed specifically to provide for student work inthe central city. The Medical School, through theWToodlawn Child Health Center, and the School ofSocial Service Administration, working with TheWoodlawn Organization (TWO), are cooperatingin an Office of Education-supported prototype manpower training program directed toward youthgangs, dropouts and other unemployed.In all these neighborhood programs, there is closecollaboration with Woodlawn and other communities, and with the City of Chicago.Coming back to the University proper, the Library system, has again had a record year — in use,acquisitions and expenditures. It is well ahead ofprojections in all these respects. Since 1962-63, annual book acquisitions have doubled. The over-allbudget has increased 69 per cent. Last, year therewere one million book circulations.New OfficersThere have been a number of changes in officers.Among them, I mention the following:Edward H. Levi, President-Elect *Gilbert L. Lee, Jr., Vice-President for Businessand Finance.Charles U. Daly, Vice-President for Development and Public Affairs.Robert B. Duffield, Director of the Argonne National Laboratory.Harold E. Bell, Comptroller.Charles D. O'Connell, Dean of Students.Morris Philipson, Director of the UniversityPress.Chairmen of Departments and Committees arelisted in the University Record of November 3.Total third-week autumn-quarter quadrangle enrollment for 1966-67 was 8,359. The correspondingfigure for this quarter is 8,561, an increase of 202.Both figures are somewhat above Profile projections, but the current year is below the predictednumber on which academic budgets were based.College students now number 2,642, sixty-oneabove last year, and twice that of 1954-55. Thequality of the entering class of 729 is judged to beat an all-time high. Scholastic Aptitude Test scoresare approximately the same as last year — 665-672in verbal and mathematics tests.* To take office in 1968.3A trend of some interest is the increase in proportion of women in the entering class. For severalyears the proportion has increased several percentage points per year. It is now 45 per cent — as compared with an over-all college percentage of 38three years ago. The Admissions Office feels thatthis year's entering class is close to an optimumproportion. I suspect this higher proportion of women is a reflection of an increased tendency nationally for women entering colleges to prefer those inor near urban centers, where they hope to becomefamiliar with urban problems and help solve them.You have no doubt heard that Barat College forwomen at Lake Forest has seriously explored thepossibility of moving to our South Campus justacross the Midway. It has now been decided that,although the move is desirable in a great manyrespects, the difficulty of broad academic exchangeor sharing of facilities in the foreseeable future, andfinancial considerations, make it untenable at thistime.Fifty-five per cent of entering college studentshere are receiving financial aid through the University — an average of $1,550 annually for those receiving aid. This does not include scholarships orfellowships awarded by the State of Illinois, or payments by other non-University agencies that aremade directly to students. Nor does it include loansor income from employment. Last year the over-allstudent scholarship and fellowship aid administeredby the University totalled $8.4 million, almost halfthe $17.5 million received from all students in tuition and other fees.Although exact figures are difficult to obtain, Ibelieve that, if scholarships and fellowships whollyadministered by outside sources, loans, employmentincome, and other benefits to students were addedto the $8.4 million, the total would exceed the$17.5 million received in fees. I doubt if any qualified applicant with established need, and a willingness to work at it, needs deny himself an education at this University for financial reasons.Beginning this year and continuing for severalmore, financial aid awarded directly by the University will be increased significantly in the Humanities and Social Sciences as a result of a $4 milliongrant from the Ford Foundation to be used to enable Ph.D. candidates to complete all requirementsin not more than 20 quarters. It is hoped most ofthem will do so in four years by working summerquarters. These funds will largely replace the presentWoodrow Wilson Fellowship Awards now made directly by the Foundation, but paid through University accounts.The recent reorganization of the College into five Collegiate Divisions — four paralleling the GraduateDivisions, and a fifth emphasizing interdivisionalstudies — is now well established.The Physical Sciences Collegiate Division hasbeen spectacularly successful in reorganizing coursesand creating new ones for non-majors. Many seniorfaculty members of the Division of the PhysicalSciences have been and are actively involved in bothcourse planning and in teaching. For example, theChairmen of the Departments of Geophysical Sciences, Mathematics and Chemistry, and the Directorof the Enrico Fermi Institute for Nuclear Studies,have been directly involved in teaching. So havemany other senior professors. I have been told thatlast year Professor Mark G. Inghram, Chairman ofthe Physics Department, spent so much time in theundergraduate general education course devising andimproving laboratory experiments that some undergraduates mistook him for a fellow student.Progress has been slower in the Biological Sciences Division, presumably because fewer of itsgraduate departments have a history and traditionof teaching in non-major undergraduate courses.With Professor James W. Moulder, Chairman ofMicrobiology, serving this year as Master of theCollegiate Division of Biology, we can look forwardto significant improvements.In the Collegiate Division of Social Sciences,Professor Gilbert WThite has established a programthat will relate basic studies more closely to theneeds of those students interested in participatingin public affairs.The College held its second Liberal Arts Conference last year, this time on The Challenge of NewKnowledge.Communication Within The UniversityIt is often alleged these days that lines of communication between students and faculty and between students and administration are inadequate,and that, in any case, students are not permittedsufficient voice in decisions affecting them. The factis, there are a number of areas in which studentshave full responsibility for decisions. To mention afew of many: the student newspaper and a numberof other publications; the student radio station;affairs of student government and many other student organizations ; the Student Co-op in the Reynolds Club; speakers of their choice on campus; theFestival of the Arts ; and the operation of the snackbars in Pierce Tower and the Bandersnatch in IdaNoyes.Within the past year many responses have beenmade to requests for improved student-faculty-officer communication. Among them are:4Specific invitations to students by the Committeeof the Council to submit to the Committee and theCouncil of this Senate memorials on matters ofconcern.A student advisory committee to the President.A student-faculty committee advisory to the Deanof Students.The Beardsley Ruml Colloquium sponsoring organized discussions on topics of current interest.One such was held last year on Vietnam.Special colloquia are another response. The National Conference on the Draft held last year is anexample of this type of colloquia.There have been several student-faculty committees to consider specific matters. They include committees on communication within the University;special student public meetings, where and howheld; the bookstore; undesirable restrictions inGovernment grants, contracts and fellowships.There also are student-faculty dinners at Hutchinson Commons and elsewhere, arranged by theCollege, by graduate divisions, and by the professional schools; luncheon meetings of students withProvost Edward H. Levi and Dean Wayne C.Booth; regularly scheduled coffee hours in Hutchinson Commons for students to meet informally withDean Booth and Dean Charles D. O'Connell.Finally, many faculty members have regular open-door office hours, during which students are welcome to communicate on a wide variety of matters.The fact is I have never before seen so many opportunities for students to communicate. Nor haveI ever known people so willing to do so as areProvost Levi, Dean Booth, and Dean O'Connell.Two new student housing units are in operationthis fall:The refurbished Eleanor Glib at Fifty-ninthStreet and Blackstone Avenue houses 100 girls.The new six-story apartment building at Dorchester Avenue and Fifty-seventh Street has twenty-three student apartments with a capacity of ninety-two persons. It houses both graduate and undergraduate women.Hutchinson Commons has been entirely remodeled, complete with new kitchen facilities. Ithas again become a popular student-faculty diningarea. The cost of remodeling was approximately$575,000.The snack area of Ida Noyes has been rebuilt ata cost of $187,000, and provides a home for thestudent-operated Bandersnatch, serving short ordersand providing student-generated entertainment atcertain times.A new and larger Stagg Field is being built to thenorth and west of the former location in a five- block area that will be devoted to student facilities.The new Stagg Field will be a part of an enlargedathletic center.An exciting Student Village is planned on twoblocks of the area between a proposed Center forthe Arts and the new Stagg Field. It will housesome 900 students in a variety of accommodations— single rooms, suites, apartments, low rise, highrise, and so forth.The architect is Edward Larrabee Barnes of NewYork. There is a scale model of his plan which Ihope you will examine. It is a magnificent concept.We now need some $25 million to make it a reality.Student HousingSome students are prone to complain about University-provided housing. Two mutually contradictory complaints are: not good enough and too expensive.Since all our student housing is subsidized bywriting off a fraction of, or all, capital costs, itcannot be improved in quality without either greatersubsidy or higher cost.A third commonly heard complaint is that thereis a shortage of student housing. The fact is, lastyear the Housing Office made cash payments of$70,000 for unoccupied rented space for students.At no time was University housing unavailable tosingle students who desired it, although it may notalways have been exactly what the applicants desired.We have a special problem with housing in theSouth Campus area scheduled to be cleared. It isoften rented at very low rates to keep appraisalsfrom dropping as they tend to do for vacant buildings. These are, therefore, attractive to some students. This practice accentuates the University'ssecurity problem, and we are expected to provideprotection in almost impossible situations.In the 1950's, when major University resources,both intellectual and financial, were directed towardvarious neighborhood problems, and students wereat an all-time low, relatively little could be done inadding needed facilities or properly maintainingexisting ones. The result was that deficits were accumulated in the form of deferred maintenance.Fortunately, we have been in a position for thepast half dozen years to begin to recover. In addition to rehabilitation and modernization of existingbuildings, new ones have been added, are in construction, or are in various stages of planning.Among these, the most significant in size, and inmany ways in importance to all areas of the University, is the new Joseph Regenstein Library, now5in construction on Stagg Field. Its total contractcost is $20.5 million.With the rebuilding of Cobb Hall, now nearingcompletion, the College will at long last have ahome it can call its own. It is partially occupied now,but will not be entirely completed until after thefirst of the year. I hope you will then examine iton an appropriate occasion. Incidentally, its rehabilitation cost is approximately ten times its original cost as the University's first permanent academic building.I am especially pleased to. be able to announcethat Mr. and Mrs. Edwin A. Bergman, both alumniof the College, have just made a gift for the combination art gallery and studio in Cobb Hall whichcan be used in an important way in teaching andat the same time provide an attractive setting forspecial exhibits.College laboratory instruction in the biologicaland physical sciences will, within the year we hope,move from the temporary building on Stagg Fieldto a permanent wing of the Research Institutesbuilding on Fifty-seventh Street.The Music Department has been moved from onetemporary building to another, larger but moreancient in appearance. It now has possession ofLexington Hall. We are optimistic that within thenext few years it will have quarters befitting itshigh quality, in the proposed Center for the Artsto be built just south and west of Pierce Tower.Some 80 per cent of the funds for the Art component of that complex are now assured. It will include the Department of Art academic quarters, theDavid and Alfred Smart Art Gallery, and a sculpture court. There will soon be announced a munificent gift of an art collection owned by a distinguished citizen of Chicago. This will assure theeffective use of the gallery and court immediatelyon their completion.Working drawings are now in preparation for theInternational Studies building on the corner east ofWTalker Museum and north of Beecher Hall.In the Physical Sciences, the Searle ChemistryLaboratory and the High Energy Physics buildingare nearing completion; the Hinds GeophysicalSciences Building is well along.Professor W. Albert Hiltner of the Departmentof Astronomy was on leave of absence last yearhelping with the planning, design and constructionof the Cerro Tololo Observatory in Chile — thenewest and most modern of ground-based astronomical observatories, located where observing conditions are the most favorable in the world. The University of Chicago is a member of the Associationof Universities for Research in Astronomy, which owns and operates it. The original forty-inch refracting telescope at our own Yerkes Observatoryhas been modernized and automated, and will againbe among the most useful instruments for the purposes for which George Ellery Hale originally designed it more than 70 years ago.The Argonne National Laboratory's staff andfacilities are important to many areas of the University. This is especially true of the Proton Accelerator. The new Director of Argonne, Robert B.Duffield, holds a joint appointment as Professor ofChemistry at the University.The proposed 200 BeV accelerator at Weston,now in the planning stage, will add an entirely newdimension to high energy physics. Its Director,Robert R. Wilson, holds a joint appointment at theUniversity as Professor of Physics.In the Division of the Biological Sciences medicalcomplex, the Silvain and Arma Wyler Children'sHospital is now completed and in full operation.The new Cardiology Center is completed andfully modernized.The A. J. Carlson Animal Research Facility isbeing built and will be ready for occupancy nextSpring.The Woodlawn Child Health Center, alreadymentioned, is in full operation in a converted storebuilding on Sixty-third street. I urge you to visit it.A much-needed basic biology research buildingis in the architectural planning stage.The Brain Research Foundation has recentlyjoined forces with The University of Chicago inproposing a Brain Research Institute, to be builtand operated as a part of the University's medicalcomplex.Plans are progressing for a new Veterans Administration Hospital, to be built to the west of Lying-in Hospital and connected with it. There are expected to be many shared facilities with the University Hospitals, the uses of which will be mutuallyadvantageous.The Divinity School has a new sister institutionin the Lutheran School of Theology at Fifty-fifthStreet and University Avenue, with which it willcollaborate in ways beneficial to both institutions.I have already mentioned the Social ServicesCenter. Working architectural drawings and specifications are now being prepared.The Graduate School of Business is outgrowingits present space and is planning to incorporate aremodeled Rosenwald Hall into its complex.The Graduate Library School will acquire a newand carefully planned home in the Joseph Regenstein Library.I believe the University is first in the nation in6number of National Historic Landmarks. One wasadded in September as part of the celebration ofthe Twenty-fifth Anniversary of the first weighingof plutonium. The number is now five. They arethe site of the first self-sustaining nuclear reaction;Robie House; Midway Studios; ExperimentalBreeder Reactor Number One, made possible by theArgonne National Laboratory through the discovery of plutonium ; and Room 405 Jones Laboratory, site of the first weighing of plutonium.Financial MattersWhat is our financial situation? The answer: becoming increasingly difficult for the reason mostprivate universities are facing financial difficulties,namely, that costs of operation are rising fasterthan income increases. Our difficulty is accentuatedto some extent because we live in a high-cost area —in housing, schooling, and so on. We also have aspecial expense in providing supplementary security— at a cost of some $600,000 annually, which is theincome on about $15 million of endowment.For all these reasons, and others, our salary levels must be relatively high. And they are risingfairly rapidly. We are now second to Harvard inthe nation in faculty salaries. If corrected for agedistribution, I strongly suspect we would be in firstplace.Excluding income from hospitals and clinics,which is returned to the operation, regular expenditures budgeted for last year, 1966-67, totaled$41.3 million. Income to cover this was estimatedto be $3.4 million short of doing so. At year-endthe actual deficit that had to be covered from unrestricted campaign funds had been reduced to justunder $1.8 million.For the current year the comparable academicexpenditures are budgeted at $45.9 million, up $4.6million or 11.1 per cent. Income to meet this budgetis estimated to be $4.2 million short of doing so. Onthe basis of past experience, this will be reduced,perhaps to $3 million. But there are two factorsthat will tend to work against such a reduction.Last year enrollments exceeded the estimates onwhich budgets were built. This year they fall short.The difference in student fees could be as much ashalf a million dollars — that is, that much less thanpredicted when budgets were drawn up.Because of our special financial needs we are, asyou are all aware, engaged in an extraordinarycampaign to raise $160 million in three years tocover basic academic needs.How are we doing?Very well in many respects, thanks to the veryeffective work of an excellent Development and Public Affairs staff headed by Charles U. Daly, whostepped in to continue the good work Richard F.O'Brien had begun prior to his departure.As of October 31, we have somewhat more than$104 million in receipts and pledges, counting onlythat fraction of the Ford Foundation challengegrant earned by cash receipts — about $11 million.In addition to the magnificent work the Trusteesare doing under Gaylord Donnelley 's NationalChairmanship in promoting the Campaign outsidethe University, they have demonstrated their confidence in a heart- warming and thoroughly persuasive way by pledging $12 million to the Campaign.Faculty members have also indicated their faith ina very tangible and generous way.Chicago-based corporations have helped the causein a gratifying manner. Some forty of them havepledged an average of $135,000 over the five-yearperiod — that is over $5 million. Other corporationshave increased it to $11 million.We now have strong campaign organizations inmajor cities — thirty in all.I am optimistic that during the next year weshall get the remaining $56 million. But I must addthat success in that will not solve all our problems.As the campaign moves forward, two things happen.Costs go up. For example, the Library -was carefully estimated to cost $18.6 million. The contractprice is $1.9 million higher. Second, expectationsrise faster than the projection anticipated.Also, as happens in all such campaigns, manycontributions are restricted in ways that precludetheir use in meeting the needs originally specifiedin the campaign.The conclusion is clear.We must not be discouraged. We must also notrelax.When Edward Levi- joined in persuading theBeadles to come to Chicago — he did so by challenging us to help solve a whole host of difficultproblems. With his continued academic leadershipassured, I know that all that are left at the end ofthe year will be in the best possible hands.November 7, 1967STATEMENT ON UNIVERSITY POLICYON NEPOTISMThe Committee has received written opinions regarding the University's policy on nepotism from allof the deans at The University of Chicago and fromthe presidents of Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, Rochester, and the Universities of Illinois,Indiana, and California. All of the universitieswhose views were sought have policies or traditions7against the appointment of relatives to the sameacademic unit within the university and all provideopportunities to depart from policy or tradition.Almost all of the deans at The University of Chicago, many of whom consulted extensively withfaculty members, regard the present policy or tradition of the University as being satisfactory,though there were minor variations in the conceptions of the present policy or tradition. There wasone mild dissent from the view that a policy — eventhough it be interpreted flexibly — against the appointment of close relatives was desirable. Somedeans had never encountered a problem in connection with the proposed appointment of close relatives; some had encountered the problem very infrequently and had not found it difficult to dealwith; some thought that the problem would be ofincreasing importance though they did not expectit to become very important.One dean found the policy to be responsible for aloss of two outstanding faculty members. This wasthe clearest and most important example of an adverse impact of the University's policy. This experience does not suggest the desirability of changingthe policy, but it does suggest the need to indicatethat the present policy does not absolutely proscribebut merely warns against the appointment of closerelatives to the same academic unit.ConclusionsThe Committee, on the basis of views expressedby others and its own deliberations, reached thefollowing conclusions :1. There should not be a statute dealing with theproblem of nepotism or the appointment of closerelatives to the faculty.2. The current policy or tradition of the University has proved to be generally satisfactory. TheCommittee hesitates to specify the policy or tradition in detail for fear that such specification wouldbe interpreted rigidly or assume the force of statute.3. In considering the appointment of close relatives on the recommendation of appropriate chairmen and deans, the Provost may wish to have theadvice of an ad hoc committee appointed by him.4. The problems are likely to be greatest if onerelative directs or evaluates another. Problems willbe greater if the relatives are in the same department or school, less if the appointments are in thesame division but in different departments, and leastif the appointments are* in different schools or divi sions. The College should be considered in this context to consist of several departments or schools.Lawrence FreedmanJames E. MillerNorman NachtriebGeorge PlatzmanJames H. Lorie, ChairmanREPORT OF THE FACULTY-STUDENTCOMMITTEE ON MEETINGSThis committee was appointed by the President toadvise the Dean of Students regarding the University's regulations with respect to meetings held oncampus. The committee wrote the following report:The Committee on Meetings commenced its workin February, 1967. All its members join in this report. Mr. Roger Price had an additional statementconcerning the work of the Committee, which is attached at the end of this report.Our analysis and recommendations on Universitypolicy regarding meetings are as follows :1. Free expression of ideas and opinions is an integral part of the function of the University. Wetherefore begin with the premise that no speech,meeting or presentation on the University campusshould be restrained or inhibited on account of itssubject matter. At the same time, the campus is, nota sanctuary from the limitations of public law,whatever they may be, concerning the content ofspeech. The University has not assumed and shouldnot assume responsibility to monitor the content ofspeech before its utterance, nor to be accountablefor its content after its utterance.2. University regulation of meetings should continue to confine itself to rules concerning time,place and manner of conducting meetings. Theproper objective of rules concerning meetings is toreconcile as fully as possible the aim of encouragingopen exchange of ideas and the aim of preservingtranquil conditions for those who are going aboutother work or business in the University. The present rules concerning meetings set forth in the Student Code are few and on the whole well observed,and they should remain that way.3. So far as we can see, indoor meetings havepresented no serious problems as to the time, placeor manner in which they have been conducted. Therequirements concerning reservation of meetingroom space, responsibility for proper care of meeting rooms and so on are reasonable in substance andadministration. It is to be assumed that these re-8quirements will continue to be administered andobserved as in the past. There are, however, someproblems concerning meetings attracting extra-campus attention, to which reference is made below.4. Outdoor meetings have presented and will continue to present some sources of friction within theUniversity community. Meetings held outdoors areusually so held exactly because they will attract totheir audience persons passing by. Outdoor meetingsachieve this "magnetic" effect to best advantagewhen conducted in the circle of the main quadrangle of the campus, where the pedestrian traffic isheaviest. Moreover, the "magnetic" effect is strongest at noon, roughly 12 :00 to 1 :30 p.m., when mostpeople are on their way to or from lunch. If outdoor meetings are recognized as part of the freespeech pattern of the campus, as we think they appropriately are, then it is also appropriate that theybe held where and when they can be most effective.We therefore think outdoor meetings may appropriately be held in the circle area. Indeed, meetings in the circle area are less potentially disruptiveto other University activities than outdoor meetingswould be in certain other areas — for example, Reynolds quadrangle, which is smaller and closer toteaching and laboratory buildings. Also, the circlearea is less exposed to general extra-Universitytraffic than some other locations.Meetings in the circle area do present problems,however :(a) They involve risk of physical damage to thegrass, planting, and sidewalk retaining ropes. Thisrisk can be reduced, though not eliminated, by somealteration of the planting and resignation to the factthat some damage is inevitable. It can also be reduced by attentiveness of those holding and participating in meetings in the area. Maintenance ofphysical beauty of the campus is not a value to beignored.(b) They involve some obstruction of pedestriantraffic. This, too, can be minimized by attentivenessof those holding and participating in meetings.(c) They would create unreasonable disturbanceif conducted with the use of power amplificationequipment. In recognition of this, present rules require that use of power amplification equipment becleared with the Dean of Students Office. The riskof disturbance is especially marked during the daytime when many students and faculty are at work.Accordingly, power amplification equipment ordinarily should not be used in outdoor meetings heldduring the day and ordinarily should be permitted for evening meetings only for special need and thenonly if the degree of amplification is moderate.5. Whether indoors or not, and whether formallyorganized or not, meetings on campus are encouraged primarily for the purpose of promoting the intellectual and cultural purposes of the Universitycommunity. Only incidentally are they for the benefit of the public at large. As a general policy, meetings and programs that are likely to attract attention to the extra-University community should beannounced, advertised and conducted in such a wayas reasonably to assure that the opportunity ofmembers of the University community to attendand participate is not impaired by public preemption or intrusion. For events in which admission isby ticket, advance sale on campus should be encouraged. For events in which public interest islikely to be intense, for example those involvingpublic personalities, off-campus advertising shouldbe so moderated that public attendance does notimpinge on the opportunity of members of the University community to attend. Within these guidelines, sponsors of campus meetings should be freeto open them to the general public. In all tases theyshould be free to limit attendance to members ofthe University community or some part thereof.6. The presence of law enforcement officials atmeetings is justified where necessary to maintainorderly conditions for meetings, as where a large orpredominantly extra-University crowd is involved.Their presence to maintain the general security ofperson and property on the campus is also appropriate. In their private, capacity, law enforcementofficials are no less welcome on campus than othermembers of the general public. However, monitoring the content of meetings and concomitantsurveillance of participants may discourage or embarrass expression of ideas and opinion. Law enforcement officials are unwelcome on campus whensuch is their purpose.7. Proper administration of the rules and policyconcerning meetings, particularly as regards persons from off the campus, requires that the Dean ofStudents Office and the campus police be readilyavailable to intercede where called upon. TheseUniversity agencies should maintain liaison witheach other and with sponsors of meetings so as tofacilitate this objective.8. We have said nothing here concerning disruptive demonstrations. Disruptive demonstrations,whatever may be their moral legitimacy in particular circumstances, do not pretend, conformity torules and procedures relating to meetings.9The recommendations of this report reflect thesubstance of present University policy as expressedin the Student Code and Student Handbook. Wehave reexamined that policy and believe it is sound.Jacqueline GoldbergJulian R. GoldsmithTom HeagyLeonard B. MeyerWilliam O'GradyRoger PriceJoshua C. TaylorKarl J. WeintraubWarner A. WickGeoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., ChairmanAdditional Statementof Roger PriceWhile I fully support the tone and substance ofthe first seven sections of the Committee's report, I do not believe that the report goes farenough. I am particularly disturbed by the lackof attention given in part eight to disruptive demonstrations, and would not be as restrictive in myapproach to this subject as the majority of theCommittee.In the first place, disruptive gatherings are, bydefinition, disorderly and illegal, coercive in theirintent as well as their effect. Yet, there is no logicalreason why a Committee on Meetings should notdiscuss all forms of meetings, legal and illegal,conventional and quite unconventional. Indeed, thedisruptive nature of a meeting should not precludediscussion about the proper role to be taken bythe administration toward such an event. Rather,that factor demands the careful attention of afaculty-student committee such as this one, established to examine the issues and ultimately suggest methods by which such situations can be besthandled and disputes most equitably settled.Second, disruptive demonstrations have had andperhaps will have a profound effect on the University. It seems wiser to discuss policies concerning these disturbances at a time when tempers andpersonal interests are not activated than would bethe case should such an evaluation be requiredduring or immediately following a disruption.The value of this report rests with its examination of and substantial agreement with Universitypolicy and procedure regarding orderly meetings.I would have thought a similar examination of theoptions open to the administration in less pleasantcircumstances to be at least as worthwhile. I donot believe that because the handling of each dis ruptive demonstration must necessarily depend onparticular facts that prior discussion of the meansof reducing conflict and restoring order is prohibited. Certainly, such is not the case with, forinstance, emergency labor disputes on a nationallevel. Similarly, an evaluation of the administration's role would not necessarily inhibit action onits part nor introduce harmful rigidity into a delicate situation. Rather, a full discussion of penalties available to the administration — ranging fromexpulsion to the all important power to do nothing — would, by sanctioning certain, but perhaps notall of the tools at the disposal of the administration, serve notice on potential student and facultyparticipators as to the possible consequences of theiractions, thereby protecting them from the harshness of unfair surprise which may be claimed without such prior discussion.I sense that faculty as well as students are unclear about their rights and responsibilities duringdisruptive demonstrations. Moreover, there seemsto be a feeling in certain quarters that it is immoral to interfere with these demonstrations, thatillegality must be protected for some undefinedhigher purpose. We have too easily avoided somevery difficult questions by declining jurisdictionover this issue. Regarding disruptive demonstrations, we have missed an opportunity to affirm oursupport for the procedures the University has usedand may want to use again in order to maintainitself as a functioning institution.ADVISORY REPORT COMMITTEESWith the concurrence of the departments and deans,the following advisory report committees have beenappointed. The program of advisory reports is intended to cover all of the academic areas of theUniversity over a period of years.Divinity SchoolJohn Dillenberger, Dean, Graduate TheologicalSeminary, BerkeleyJames Gustavson, Yale Divinity SchoolRobert Lynn, Union Theological SeminaryKrister Stendahl, Harvard Divinity School, ChairmanClaude Welch, University of PennsylvaniaGermanic Languages and LiteraturesHermann Boeschenstein, The University ofToronto, ChairmanKonstantine Reichardt, Yale UniversityFrank G. Ryder, Indiana University10philosophyRichard Brandt, University of MichiganGregory Vlastos, Princeton UniversityMorton White, Harvard University, ChairmanSlavic Languages and LiteraturesVictor Erlich, Yale University, ChairmanKathryn Feuer, The University of TorontoHenry Kucera, Brown UniversityDean Worth, University of California, LosAngelesADVISORY COMMITTEESStudent Advisory Committee tothe PresidentThe students serving on this committee were recommended by the academic dean for the area indicated and appointed by the President.Pauline AngioneGraduate Library SchoolRuth BoutinDivision of the Social SciencesCarolyn Margaret ChaveThe CollegeRichard CooperDivision of the Social SciencesRobert CrawfordDivision of the HumanitiesRona EchtSchool of Social Service AdministrationRalph FranklinGraduate Library SchoolLuke FuscoSchool of Social Service AdministrationPhilip GettsLaw SchoolLarry L. GreenfieldDivinity SchoolRobert HallDivision of the Biological SciencesDarrell lohnsonLaw SchoolAbraham Joseph IIIThe College Mario MartinDivision of the Physical SciencesFitzhugh MullanDivision of the Biological SciencesRobert David RansonGraduate School of BusinessHoward Fred ReiszDivinity SchoolJules ShanesonDivision of the Physical SciencesDinah Solomon StevensonDivision of the HumanitiesRobert WentzDivision of the Social SciencesRichard Alan WilliamsonGraduate School of BusinessAdvisory Faculty-Student Committeeon Campus Student LifeOn the recommendation of the Council of the University Senate, the President established this committee for two years "to be advisory to the Dean ofStudents on the range of non-academic- functionsperformed by his office." The faculty members wereappointed by the President on the recommendationof the Committee of the Council, and the studentmembers were appointed by the Dean of Studentson an interim basis. In connection with the appointment of the student members, the Dean of Studentsstated, "The first item on the committee's agendawill be to devise, for recommendation to the President, a method for the election of the student members of the committee."Charles D. O'Connell, Chairman, ex officioKarl Bemesderfer, Secretary, ex officioFacultyMark Ashin — EnglishJoseph J. Ceithaml — BiochemistryPeter Dembowski — Romance LanguagesKenneth Dam — LawHarold Richman — School of Social Service AdministrationStudentsGary Benenson — CollegeMarc Cogan— Social SciencesEdward Hearne — HumanitiesDavid Kindig — Biological SciencesRochelle Waldman — College11NEW FACULTY APPOINTMENTS: July 1, 1967 to June 30, 1968BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES DIVISIONDr. Daniel J. McCartyDr. Gebhard SchumacherDr. Martin GrafDr. Robert CaplanfDr. Horst R. KonradDr. Angelito SaquetonfDr. Donald H. Williams ProfessorAssociate ProfessorInstructorInstructorInstructorInstructorInstructor MedicineObstetrics & GynecologyMedicineMedicineSurgeryMedicinePsychiatryHUMANITIES DIVISIONBrigitta Kratky Instructor German, CollegeEdward Mondello Instructor MusicJay Rubin Instructor Far Eastern LanguagesYvette Scalzittit Instructor Romance LanguagesPHYSICAL SCIENCES DIVISIONJim Douglas, Jr.Paul R. JulianJuergen HinzeUlrich OberstMartin Tangora ProfessorNCAR AchateAssociate "ProfessorAssistant ProfessorInstructorInstructor MathematicsGeophysical SciencesChemistry, CollegeMathematics, CollegeMathematics, CollegeSOCIAL SCIENCES DIVISIONJohn Bormuthf Associate Professor EducationWalter Mertens Assistant Professor SociologyRobert Myers Assistant Professor EducationSusan Stoldolsky Assistant Professor EducationStephen Hazlett Instructor EducationGeorge Klein Instructor SociologyTHE COLLEGEJuergen Hinze Assistant Professor Physical Sciences*, ChemistryFr. Albert Moraczewski Assistant Professor Biology*Brigitta Kratky Instructor Humanities*, GermanSilvia Krois Instructor Humanities*Ulrich Oberst Instructor Physical Sciences*, MathematicsMartin Tangora Instructor Physical Sciences*, MathematicsHildegund Weide Instructor Humanities*GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESSArthur LafferJohn Evans Assistant ProfessorInstructor* Indicates Collegiate Division.t Denotes correction of previous listing.12VISITING FACULTY APPOINTMENTSBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES DIVISIONDr. Louis N. Ka tzDr. Naohiko InoueDr. Nozomi Nohara Visiting ProfessorVisiting Assistant ProfessorVisiting Assistant Professor PhysiologyZoller Dental ClinicMedicineHUMANITIES DIVISIONElizabeth AnscombeDavid BevingtonPeter GeachJean VarenneRonald EmmerickSvetozar PetrovicRichard Van FossenAli AlparslanErland BohlinPietro Nobile Visiting ProfessorVisiting ProfessorVisiting ProfessorVisiting ProfessorVisiting Associate ProfessorVisiting Associate ProfessorVisiting Associate ProfessorVisiting Assistant ProfessorVisiting Assistant ProfessorVisiting Assistant Professor PhilosophyEnglishPhilosophySouth Asian LanguagesNear Eastern Languages,Oriental InstituteSlavic Languages and LiteraturesEnglish, CollegeNear Eastern LanguagesGermanic LanguagesRomance Languages, CollegePHYSICAL SCIENCES DIVISIONLeon LukaszewiczWlodzimierz KolosJan-Erik Roos Visiting ProfessorVisiting Associate ProfessorVisiting Assistant Professor MathematicsPhysicsMathematicsSOCIAL SCIENCES DIVISIONAllan Black CunninghamMalcolm Fisher Visiting ProfessorVisiting Professor HistoryEconomicsD. Anthony LowFujio MiuraJulian Pitt-RiversBernard Slicher van Bath Visiting ProfessorVisiting ProfessorVisiting ProfessorVisiting Professor HistoryAnthropologyAnthropologyEconomicsKazuro HaniharaCarol Sue Feldman Visiting Associate ProfessorVisiting Instructor AnthropologyCommittee on Human DevelopmentTHE COLLEGERichard Van Fossen Visiting Associate Professor Humanities*, EnglishAlbert NnoliPietro Nobile Visiting Assistant ProfessorVisiting Assistant Professor Social Sciences*Humanities*, Romance LanguagesGRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESSJohn BeckettDavid HuangPeter BarthAshford StalnakerAlexander Swoboda* Indicates Collegiate Division Visiting ProfessorVisiting ProfessorVisiting Assistant ProfessorVisiting Assistant ProfessorVisiting Assistant Professor13DIVINITY SCHOOLStig Wikander Visiting ProfessorLAW SCHOOLPeter Schlechtriem Visiting Assistant ProfessorRETIREMENTSJohn Corominas*Raissa Palyi* ProfessorAssociate Professor Romance Languages and LiteraturesSlavic Languages and Literatures* Incorrectly listed in the Nov. 3 issue as having resigned.IN MEMORIAMFollowing is a list of names of those who died between November, 1966, and November, 1967. TheSecretary of the Faculties would be grateful to receive information on omissions or corrections.Ernest W. Burgess EmeritusCarlos Castillo EmeritusRonald S. Crane EmeritusDr. George F. Dick EmeritusWilliam A. Irwin EmeritusCarl H. Kraeling EmeritusHyman G. Landau FacultyMayme I. Logsdon EmeritusClarence B. Randall TrusteeBabette K. Stern FacultyDr. Charles H. Swift EmeritusWinifred Ver Nooy EmeritusRoyal S. Van de Woestyne Emeritus DiedDecember 27, 1966March 303 1967August 27, 1967October 11, 1967April 22, 1967November 14, 1967December 2, 1966July 4, 1967August 4, 1967June 15, 1967November 17, 1967May 17, 1967August 4a 1967VISITING COMMITTEESVisiting Committee on theSchool of Social Service AdministrationTrustee MembersStanley G. Harris, Jr., ChairmanCharles BentonPhilip D. Block, Jr.Edward L. RyersonHermon D. SmithSydney Stein, Jr.Frank H. Woods Non-Trustee MembersJames Brown IVMrs. William M. Collins, Jr.William W. Darrow, Jr.Mrs. Robert L. FooteMrs. Howard GoodmanMrs. Herbert S. GreenwaldHarry H. Hagey14Mortimer B. HarrisMrs. Ben W. HeinemanMrs. W. Press HodgkinsMrs. Rose KrinsleyC. Virgil MartinMrs. Robert B. MayerKenneth F. MontgomeryPaul L. MullaneyMrs. George A. RanneyWilliam H. RobinsonLawrence K. SchnadigMerrill ShepardMrs. George W. K. SnyderHerbert R. StratfordMrs. John P. Wilson, Jr.Maynard WishnerThe Council on the Physical SciencesTrustee MembersRobert C. Gunness, ChairmanEdward McCormick BlairRobert P. GwinnRobert S. IngersollVisiting Committeeon the Center for Middle Eastern StudiesJames H. Douglas, ChairmanMarver BernsteinJohn C. CampbellMarcus CohnErnest GrossNajeeb HalabyFowler HamiltonThomas HughesThe Hon. Jacob JavitsThe Hon. Robert KomerThe Hon. Carl MarcyEscott ReidDr. George RobertsHerbert SalzmanThe Hon. Walter V. SchaeferJames SpainCouncil on the Graduate School of BusinessTrustee MembersJoseph S. Wright, ChairmanB. E. BensingerPhilip D. Block, Jr.Dwight M. CochranFairfax M. ConeRobert C. GunnessRobert P. GwinnRobert S. IngersollDavid M. Kennedy Ellmore C. PattersonPeter G. PetersonTheodore 0. YntemaNon-Trustee MembersSeth G. AtwoodThomas G. AyersEdmund F. BallKarl R. BendetsenHarry 0. BercherCharles W. BoandRobert E. BrookerW. Newton Burdick, Jr.Marvin ChandlerThomas H. CoulterG. Kenneth CrowellJohn P. GallagherRobert W. GalvinPaul W. GoodrichIrving B. HarrisElis S. HoglundJ. Ward KeenerThomas A. KellyLawrence A. KimptonEdwin A. Locke, Jr.Edward C. Logelin, Jr.Paul LorenzC. Virgil MartinJohn A. MattmillerWilliam C. MushamLovett C. PetersJames M. PhelanHerbert V. ProchnowRobert W. RenekerFred A. ReplogleJohn G. SevcikGeorge L. ShinnL. D. StinebowerSterling TookerJ. W. Van GorkomGeorge H. WatkinsThe Council on Medical and Biological ResearchTrustee MembersPeter G. Peterson, ChairmanL. T. CoggeshallFairfax M. ConeDavid B. McDougalAlbert Pick, Jr.Albert W. ShererGardner H. SternFrank L. SulzbergerChristopher W. WilsonJoseph S. Wright15Non-Trustee MembersRobert E. BrookerW. Newton Burdick, Jr.Thomas F. CassPhilip CochranHenry CrownHarry K. DeWittGeorge H. DovenmuehlCharles W. EbersoldMaurice GoldblattWilliam B. GrahamWilliam J. GuytonIrving B. HarrisSamuel JohnsonJoseph B. LantermanJohn T. Llewellyn IIGraham J. MorganArthur C. Nielsen, Jr.Bryan S. Reid, Jr.Burr L. RobbinsJames E. RutherfordFrank C. Schell, Jr.Daniel SearleH. Wallace TudorHans WandersLynn A. WilliamsEdward F. WilsonVisiting Committee on the CollegeTrustee MembersEmmett Dedmon, ChairmanRobert P. GwinnCharles H. PercyAlbert Pick, Jr.Sydney Stein, Jr.Non-Trustee MembersArthur A. BaerJohn J. BerwangerJohn F. DilleRobert EbertWilliam S. Gray IIIHoward E. GreenRobert J. GreenebaumJohn T. HortonJohn A. JohnsonWilliam Rea KeastE. Wilson LyonChester E. McKittrickKeith I. ParsonsSaul S. ShermanDavid B. TrumanRobert C. UptonMarshall Wais, Jr.F. Champion Ward James D. WatsonPhilip C. WhiteHubert L. WillHoward L. WillettVisiting Committee on the Divinity SchoolTrustee MembersHoward Goodman, ChairmanEmmett DedmonGaylord DonnelleyGlen A. LloydJohn NuveenNon-Trustee MembersVallee 0. AppelRussell M. BairdRobert E. BrookerBland B. Button, Jr.Howard E. GreenJoseph 0. HansonWayne A. JohnstonWilliam G. KarnesEdward H. McDermottKeith I. ParsonsHerbert V. ProchnowEdward K. WellesClinton YouleVisting Committee on the Law SchoolTrustee MembersJames H. DouglasBen W. HeinemanGlen A. LloydGeorge A. RanneyHenry F. TenneyNon-Trustee MembersThe Hon. Walter V. Schaefer, ChairmanMorris B. AbramWilliam AveryRussell BakerJohn Potts BarnesRichard BentleyPaul CarringtonLaurence A. CartonWarren ChristopherThe Hon. Tom C. ClarkThe Hon. Charles H. DavisHerbert C. De YoungHoward EllisThe Hon. Samuel B. EpsteinOwen FairweatherMorris E. FeiwellThe Hon. Abe Fortas16The Hon. Henry J. FriendlyDwight P. GreenGeorge E. HaleA. Leslie HodsonLawrence HoweGeorge F. JamesAlbert E. Jenner, Jr.Charles R. KaufmanThe Hon. Frank R. KenisonWillard L. KingFrancis KirkhamAbe KrashFrank J. MaddenRoss L. MaloneLouis M. MantynbandOrison S. MardenFrank D. Mayer Edward D. McDougal, Jr.The Hon. Carl McGowanWilliam A. McSwainKenneth F. MontgomeryThomas R. MulroyBernard NathNorman H. PritchardThe Hon. Elmer J. SchnackenbergThe Hon. Ulysses S. SchwartzWhitney N. SeymourMilton I. ShadurDaniel C. SmithThomas E. SunderlandPeter N. TodhunterThe Hon. Roger J. TraynorThe Hon. Sterry R. WatermanHarry N. WyattMOORE SCULPTURE"Nuclear Energy," a 12 -foot bronze by HenryMoore, was unveiled on the campus Dec. 2 in ceremonies commemorating the 25th anniversary of thefirst self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction.The Trustees of the Art Institute of Chicago, as Trustees of the B. F. Ferguson Monument Fund,purchased the sculpture from Moore. The University, which owns the Stagg Field site, has made thearea available for public viewing of the statue.CALENDAR OF EVENTSDECEMBERDecember 21— GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: Faculty-Staff Christmas Party.December 25— TV SERIES: "Charlando," Channel 9, 11:30 a.m.VARSITY TRACK: 15th Annual Holiday Meet, the Field House.December 24— TV SERIES: University of Chicago Roundtable, Channel 11, 5:30 p.m.December 29-30— VARSITY BASKETBALL: Christmas Tournament, Knox, Grinnell, Colorado, theField House.December 30— -TV SERIES: "Charlando," Channel 9, 11:30 a.m.VARSITY TRACK: UCTC Open Meet, the Field House.December 31— TV SERIES: University of Chicago Roundtable, Channel 11, 5:30 p.m.EXHIBITIONSNovember 26to December 21— "Contemporary Art for Young Collectors," Renaissance Society Gallery, 108 Good-speed Hall, Monday-Friday, 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Saturday and Sunday, 1:00-5:00 p.m.17CONVENTIONS IN CHICAGODecember 27-29 — Modern Language Association, Palmer House.December 27-30 — Linguistics Society of America, Pick-Congress.JANUARYJanuary 1— START OF INFORMATION SCIENCES YEAR (tentative).January 3-4-REGISTRATION FOR WINTER QUARTER.January 3-CLASSES FOR WINTER QUARTER BEGIN.January d— TV SERIES: "Charlando," Channel 9, 11:30 a.m.VARSITY SWIMMING: At Lawrence University, Appleton, Wisconsin.VARSITY BASKETBALL: At University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.VARSITY WRESTLING: At Carthage Quadrangular, Carthage, Illinois.VARSITY GYMNASTICS: U.I.C.C. & Wheaton, George Williams, the Field House.VARSITY TRACK: Varsity UCTC & Open, the Field House.January 7— RADIO SERIES : From the Midway, "Intellectual Life in the Commercial Sector,"Maurice B. Mitchell, University of Denver chancellor.TV SERIES: University of Chicago Roundtable, Channel 11, 5:30 p.m.January 10— COMMITTEE ON CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION: Frontiers of Medicine, 1967-1968, "Mental Retardation— Modern Approaches," F. Howell Wright,Coordinator, Billings P-117, 2:00-5:00 p.m.VARSITY BASKETBALL: At Illinois Institute of Technology.January 13— -TV SERIES : "Charlando," Channel 9, 11:30 a.m.VARSITY BASKETBALL: Judson College, the Field House.VARSITY WRESTLING: At Lake Forest, Lake Forest, Illinois.VARSITY GYMNASTICS: Illinois State University, the Field House.VARSITY TRACK: Invitational Relays, the Field House.January 14— RADIO SERIES: From the Midway, "A Theory of Psychological Addiction: Freedomand Slavery in the Means-End Relationship," Silvan Thomkins, professor and directorof the Center for Research in Cognition and Affect at the City University of New York.TV SERIES: University of Chicago Roundtable, Channel 11, 5:30 p.m.January 16— DEANS MEETING: 11:30 a.m.VARSITY WRESTLING: At University of Illinois Chicago Circle.January 18-GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS EXECUTIVE PROGRAM: Club Luncheon,Yale Brozen, speaker, Sherman House, 12 noon.January 19-21— RENAISSANCE PLAYERS: Mankind, directed by Annette Fern; and Play of theSacrament, directed by Paul D'Andrea, Cloister Club, Ida Noyes, 8 :30 p.m.January 19— VARSITY BASKETBALL: Roosevelt University, the Field House.VARSITY SWIMMING: Great Lakes Naval Training Station, the Field House.VARSITY TRACK: DePaul University, the Field House.WORKS OF THE MIND LECTURE: "The Poverty of Rhetoric Today," WayneBooth, Downtown Center, 8:00 p.m.CHAMBER MUSIC SERIES: Beaux Arts Quartet, Mandel Hall, 8:30 p.m.ISJanuary 20— -TV SERIES: "Charlando," Channel 9, 11:30 a.m.VARSITY BASKETBALL: Lake Forest, the Field House.VARSITY WRESTLING: Double Dual— Knox & Iowa Wesleyan at Galesburg, Illinois.VARSITY GYMNASTICS: Open.VARSITY TRACK: 14th Chicagoland Open, the Field House.January 21-^ RADIO SERIES : From the Midway, "World Health and World Politics," JosephHandler, director of U.N. World Health Organization.TV SERIES: University of Chicago Roundtable, Channel 11, 5:30 p.m.January 22— CENTER FOR POLICY STUDY: Urban Environment Conference, Law SchoolCourt Room and Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.January 2d— CONTEMPORARY CHAMBER PLAYERS: Together with the Fromm Music Foundation, play the works of Stepan Wolpe, Mandel Hall, 8:30 p.m.January 27— VARSITY BASKETBALL: At Oberlin College, Oberlin, Ohio.VARSITY FENCING: Wayne State & Cleveland State at Detroit, Michigan.VARSITY WRESTLING: Concordia, the Field House.VARSITY SWIMMING: Double Dual— Rockford & Wheaton at Rockford, Illinois.VARSITY GYMNASTICS: At Wisconsin State University, Whitewater, Wisconsin.VARSITY TRACK: Northwestern University, the Field House.TV SERIES: "Charlando," Channel 9, 11:30 a.m.January 28— RADIO SERIES: From the Midway, "Evolution as a World View," Richard C.Lewontin.TV SERIES: University of Chicago Roundtable, Channel 11, 5:30 p.m.January 30— DEANS MEETING : 11:30 a.m.January 31— VARSITY SWIMMING: At George Williams, Downers Grove, Illinois.CONVENTIONS IN CHICAGOJanuary 17-20— American Board of Orthopedic Surgery, part of the American Academy of OrthopedicSurgeons, Palmer House.January 20-25— American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Palmer House.January 24-27 — American Group Psychotherapy Association, La Salle.January 28to February 2— American Association of Physics Teachers, part of the American Physical Society,Palmer House.American Institute of Physics, part of the American Physical Society, Palmer House.American Physical Society, Palmer House.THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO RECORDOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE FACULTIES9a§s>ownoSdD.osroGfQ0oON— nm ± c? >=5 O ¦u enzP > Oo - ¦""r—r— a >5 Z o22 mCO