INSIDEField Hockey's final gamepage fourteen Transcript ofGray/Davis debatepage five Out of Hyde Park andinto the Limelightpage sevenThe ClVolume 95. No. 15 The Ifni licaeo Maroonvpr^itv nf Tnpfcriflv fMnhpr 29 IMSPublic Policy reviewBRUCE MONTELLA breaks the 1978 rushing record on this 12 yard run in the first quarter.Gray, Davis debate divestmentBy Molly McClainAssociate EditorThe tenth anniversary of theCommittee on Public Policy Stu¬dies will see a substantial changein the organizational structure ofthis teaching program. A Univer¬sity review’ group, comprised ofdeans, ex-deans, and a formerprovost, has been assembled torecommend possible structuraloptions.The Committee is at present “akind of structural anomaly,”says Norman Bradburn, Provostof the University. It is neither aformal graduate school - as is theGraduate School of Business - noris it an independent division - asis the Division of Social Science.Instead, the program originatedas an effort to bring “togetherfaculty with related interestsfrom different disciplines in a sin¬gle academic unit,” according toa promotional brochure.Members of the Committee comefrom such diverse backgroundsas the Division of the PhysicalSciences and the Law' School.A review of the Committee isbeing undertaken at the presenttime because “under the condi¬tion of being a committee itdoesn’t have the right of makingtenure appointments,” statesBradburn. Two junior appoint¬ments made some years ago arenow coming up for review. Brad¬burn also explains that the Com¬mittee’s “stabilized programs”and “established identity” pro¬vide justification for the presentreview.The review group will be consi¬dering a variety of alternatives tothe Committee’s present organi¬zation. According to Bradburn,“the only option not being consi¬ dered” is keeping the programthe way it is.”William Kruskal, professor inthe Department of Statistics andformer dean of the Division of So¬cial Sciences, is the chairman ofthe review group. Says Kruskal,the Committee could become a“formally constituted profession¬al graduate school.” It could“coalesce with one of the divi¬sions...or one of the otherschools,” or the program couldbe “phased out...in a responsiblegraduate way.” Kruskal notesthat the review group’s optionsare not restricted to these three.There may be other alternativesthat have yet to be brought tolight.Russell Hardin, chairman ofthe Committee on Public PolicyStudies, believes that the “bestoption” would be to create agraduate school of Public PolicyStudies. Says Hardin, “thebeauty of the Committee isits...organization which brings infaculty from all over the Univer¬sity.” He is of the opinion that theCommittee “would suffer” if itwere incorporated into a divisionor school.The Committee provides a“blending of theory and practicewhich makes the programunique,” says Daryl Moore, agraduate student in the Commit¬tee. A member of the “Pub Polit¬buro” — a Public Policy studentorganization which suggests ad¬ministrative improvements —Moore fears that a merger withanother school or division “wouldweaken the program.”The review group hopes tomake its recommendation by theend of the quarter but Kruskalanticipates that additional timemay be necessary. By Richard A. SengerStaff WriterUniversity President HannaGray made a public appearanceto discuss and debate Apartheidand the issue of university divest¬ment with Jennifer Davis, execu¬tive director of the AmericanConference on South Africa lastTuesday before a packed KentAuditorium crowd.The last of three workshopsheld as part of an all day teach-inon South Africa and Apartheid,the Gray-Davis debate was themost heavily attended, with an audience estimated in excess of500, plus live broadcast and allday coverage of the event byWHPK. Although it was not actu¬ally a true “debate” as bothspeakers took turns speakingfrom one podium and never actu¬ally engaged in any spontaneousarguments, each indirectly andpolitely rebuked the otherthroughout the ninety minute ses¬sion.The workshop was divided intoa twenty minute introduction byeach guest followed by an audi¬ence question and answer period, and finally, closing remarks. Thelargely pro-divestment crowdwas very much involved in thediscussion with many outburstsof applause and several of laugh¬ter during the debate and a stand¬ing ovation after Davis’ openingremarks.The main issue of the workshopwas the question of whether ornot divestment is an effective andeconomically sound measureagainst apartheid for the U of C.Davis presented the pro-divest¬ment view. “The argument iscontinued on page threeGreenstone Committee faces numerous problemsBy Elizabeth deGraziaStaff WriterThis article is the first in aseries examining the question ofthe natural size of the Universityand other issues currently beingreviewed by the University’sGreenstone Committee.The “natural size” of the Uni¬versity can best be described asthat size and distribution of stu¬dent enrollment which allow ade¬quate facilities and support stafffor all students and sufficient tu¬ition revenue from the Universitywhile maintaining the foundingprinciple of the University: thatof being primarily a research uni¬versity devoted to developing fu¬ture scholars for academic ca¬reers.This natural University size ap¬pears to hover around 8,000 stu¬dents.The issue of the natural size ofthe University and the relativesizes of its three major compo¬nents — the graduate divisions,the professional schools, and theCollege — was debated five yearsago, leading to the formation ofthe Bradburn Committee. Thiscommittee studied 1) the prob¬lem of the University’s enroll¬ment trends (namely a signifi¬cant decline in graduateenrollment) 2) possible responsesby the University, and 3) their po¬tential consequences. The com¬mittee published its report in theApril 4,1980 issue of the Universi ty of Chicago Record.This article will summarizethese problems and the responsesthe Bradburn committee offered.Subsequent articles will discussthe present consequences of theadministration’s decisions on thisissue based on the committee’srecommendations 5 years ago.The consequences of these deci¬sions can be seen throughout theUniversity in housing, financial aid and the University’s finances,the quality of education, and, ofcourse, the enrollment figuresthemselves. These issues will bepresented as separate articles.Today, faced with a differentset of enrollment trends and po¬tential problems, the Universityhas another committee onceagain examining the question ofthe natural size of the Universi¬ty- Chaired by political scienceprofessor J. David Greenstone,the new committee’s task is toconsider issues of enrollment size“in terms of the size, balance, thedistribution of programs acrossthe University, their relation ofthese to faculty size and to thescope of our resources,” accord¬ing to University PresidentHanna Gray.The committee’s deadline forsubmitting its report was October1, 1985. Greenstone says that thereport will be published “as soonas possible.”When questioned about the di¬rection in which the committeewas headed. Greenstone replied,“I’ve made a decision not to dis¬cuss the substance of the decisionof the committee.”Greenstone was very adamantabout this, feeling that he had“made a terrible mistake in talk¬ing to the Herald”. Greenstoneappeared in 10-25-85 Hyde ParkHerald article about the Green¬stone committee and believesthat he had been misrepresentedin that article.Greenstone did add the follow¬ing personal note: “There was anopen letter to me in the Maroonwhich emphasized the impor¬tance of our maintaining the tra¬dition of small, faculty-taughtclasses. Speaking for myself per¬sonally, and not necessarily forthe committee. I think this is a very important concern.”Apparently the Bradburn com¬mittee felt it of concern back in1980. “Increasing class size is oneway to handle a larger studentbody, but decisions about classsize must also take into accountthe importance of small classsizes to our ability to attract un¬dergraduate students.” On theIssue of faculty-taught classes,the committee stressed the Uni¬versity’s “obligations in staffingthe core and the basic courseswith regular faculty”.The University’s 1980 Quadran¬gle total of 7,569 degree studentswas divided roughly equallyamong the graduate divisions,College, and professional schools.The graduate divisions’ 30% wastheir smallest showing in years,as “the divisions constitutedslightly over 40 percent of the stu¬dent body from the late 1930sthrough the early 1970s...”The Bradburn committee con¬vened because the Universitywas faced with the prospect thatit might “fail to maintain thatsize (the natural size—approxi¬mately 8.000 students) because ofdeclining enrollments in thegraduate divisions Any solu¬tions found had to “...preservethe character of the University asa research institution, maintainthe high quality of the studentbody, and allow us to remain suf¬ficiently large to sustain the intel-eonttnued on page threeAUTUMN STUDENT ENROLLMENTS 1980-85Final 1980 Final 1984 3rd Week 1985COLLEGE 2275 2981 2930-Freshmen 730 785 798-Transfers 96 117 87DIVISIONS 2245 2259 2400-Biological Science 285 283 275-Humanities 539 581 624-Physical Science 368 406 458-Social Science 1053 989 1043PROFESSIONALSCHOOLS 2568 2689 2803-Business 959 1128 1234-Divinity 225 248 245•Law 507 543 529•Library Science-Medicine 72 62 62428 413 407•Public Policy 57 92 95-Social Service Admin. 326 203 231TOTAL DEGREE 7569 7929 8133STUDENTS Source: Dean of Students In the UniversityIn 1980, the Bradburn Committee recommended increasing the size of the Col¬lege to about 3000 students, largely to make up for declines in graduate enroll¬ment Today, some observers are predicting a resurgence of graduate enroll¬ment, as may be indicated by the latest figures for Humanities and SocialScienceS.G. ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE SAFPresents“OAT f nilJEEN”tl/iLLUwVEEIiTHE MOVIEstarringJAMIE LEE CURTISFREE/UCIDHalloween NightThursday, October 31, 1985inBartlett Gym, 10:00Followed by DUNKIN DONUTS & CIDER!> U 7|l> ft > *A < h 7 A >> L VL- ^ A4 1' 4 A </ C AL ^ L 4N4 V> < A ft >A V <U ^N v ' 1 » » ft c a ^Nlv\sj 7 ^ C r a < >y si rA < cVN, K A 7 ^^^ \ ^ y i* ^ *77A<Vj/lV7v<V< >L. H S] C L /s __ * <. 7 A"7 r 4>OR A POSITION ON THE. ± K n / "7 7 , ' 7 v y 1< 7 t. 7 v 7s/ ^ >rU A 4 >ftAV A A <r- 74. V v C A ^ ^ 4 ^ V ^ V s/ 7ft V L ^ ^r sj v . ft n ^^ z. v A_^_ i aMAJORACTIVITIESBOARD7 r> * 7 * 7 7 A 4 V rv‘7^"r47Ar. Ar -7 ^ At > L A*" A -7 V7 A V7 %^R€$EONrStBt|.mES 1 NCtUDERUktCUY '> . rw w w A 77/1 ^ >1 -t\A A ^A < ^ _'4 7** - — - ~7,v jr A vA L\wrmw’m.mm mm mbW ■ ■ ■w’ ----- - "T "i v ^r^v rF',>7AA/A,^>VA m r v 4 4 <7 r a r4,.4^/'4-4r 1, > 4 ^ L 4 r- *- 4 f4 >^4<V< 4 V 7 4 < 4- ANDAftEMJfNOV.5 BY StOftPM7 ft4 A 4 ** V 7% A v v ^ ^ ./A r \ A 4 A 7 4■ ■•‘■■■~- - -ft--A. INOW OPEN!TOTALLY REMODELED!NEW SEATS, PROJECTION & SOUND.THREE NEW THEATRESPresenting the finest first runmotion picture entertainment.KRUSH GROOVEFRI., MON.-THUR.: 6:20 * 8:20 - 10:20SAT.-SUN.: 2:20 - 4:20 - 6:20 - 8:20 - 10:20AFTER HOURSFRI., MON.-THUR.: 5:45 - 7:45 - 9:45SAT.-SUN.: 1:45 - 3:45 - 5:45 - 7:45 - 9:45FRI., MON.-THUR.: 6:00 - 8:00 - 10:00SAT.-SUN.: 2:00 - 4:00 - 6:00 - 8:00 - 10:00BACK TO SCHOOL - STUDENT SPECIAL*★ SPECIAL PRICE - 52.50 Mon.-Thur, Last Show★ The drinks are on us —FREE DRINK with medium popcorn purchase*with U. of C. student I.D.rA kwCHILDREN UNDER 6 NOT ADMITTED AFTER 6 P.M.$2.50 UNTIL FIRST SHOW STARTS2 The Chicago Maroon Tuesday. October 20, 19f£Gray, Daviscontinued from page oneabout our responsibility over people’s lives;do we perpetuate the system or challengethe system? One argument against divest¬ment is that it might risk causing blacks tolose jobs and thus hurt black people, butthat argument is wrong because we knowthat blacks are literally dying, risking lifefor freedom, not just jobs.Davis also stated her distrust of US com¬panies in South Africa. “Make no mistakethat US companies don’t solve the unem¬ployment problem-over half the black popu¬lation is permanently locked up in reserva¬tions because they cannot get permission towork, so jobs are certainly not at risk tothem. I think it is unrealistic for us to expectUS corporations to suddenly lead the crus-dade for social change...they don’t do ithere, so why should they do it there...whereeven the law doesn’t make them do the job?There are polls in South Africa showingbroad black support for...calling for divest¬ment/disinvestment pressures (and yet)the South African government acts veryconcerned that you shouldn’t hurt the blackpeople by disinvesting. So who do you be¬lieve when you discuss the issue of slavery,the slave or the slavemaster?”Gray agreed that pressure should be ap¬plied to companies doing business in SouthAfrica but was skeptical about the long last¬ing impact divestment could have and theactual role a university should play in suchpolitical issues. “The funds of the universitycome under the responsibility of a group oftrustees (40) who are entrusted with themanagement of the resources. These re¬sources are to be used not in ways that theymay find as individuals most attractive, butas ways that speak to the responsibility theyhave for the long term health and preserva¬tion of the resources of the institution so thatit can do what it has been set up to do.”Gray continued, “our trustees have feltthat to remain share holders in the corpora¬tion voting proxies on a case by case basis inorder to influence the conduct of companiesis a more responsible act on our part thandivestment would be. There are those whoargue with deep conviction that the symbol¬ic action itself will have an effect that reverberates, but reverberations like the ripplesafter you cast a stone in the sea tend not tolast very long. Then you’ve lost your lever¬age and you’ve lost your opportunity to in¬fluence the company.’’ The fact that the majority of the audiencefavored divestment became clear duringthe question and answer portion of the de¬bate, as the questioning was open to bothspeakers, but all twelve of the audiencequestions were addressed to PresidentGray. Most of the questions dealt with theissue of whether divestment would be anymore political than investment, and thequestion of how the university could be hurtfinancially by divestment.Gray answered by saying that the univer¬sity was not investing in companies that aredoing a large volume of business (“usuallyless than one percent”) and/or who had re¬ceived poor ratings from the independentresearch firms. When someone suggestedthat, in fact, the university did have invest¬ments in six companies with a 3A ratingfrom the Investors Resource ResponsibilityCorporation (IRRC), Gray explained theUniversity’s position by saying that theIRRC rating defined as “needs to make pro¬gress” can be “interpreted either as ‘hasthe promise of doing more’ or that it ‘needsto do more’ ”. Gray also noted that inquirieshad been and were being made into thesecompanies’ present actions with the possi¬bility of divestment if the company did notimprove in the upcoming December 31 re¬port.Gray was questioned on whether this wasa policy of being political some of the timeby a mathematics professor who said, “Ihave a little trouble with your logic. You’vestated today that U Chicago has a policy ofdisinvestment under certain conditions, forexample if a company operates in extremeand continual defiance of Sullivan princi¬ples. At the same time when you are askedto totally divest, you argue you cannot usepolitical and social criterion to determineinvestments. You’re saying it is okay to be alittle political but not wholly, effectively po¬litical. To me, it’s like being a little preg¬nant -1 don’t understand it.” Gray respond¬ed, receiving enthusiastic applause, bysuggesting “that’s what’s wrong with math¬ematical logic these days.” She then ex¬plained that there is variation in the policiesand attitudes of companies in South Africaand that the Sullivan Princples and ratingsare merely a set of guidelines and not theonly criteria for investment decisions.Jennifer Davis closed the debate with asummary of why she felt divestment wasnot any more political than investment andthat the university should divest regard¬less.“Tonight I’ve heard it is not appropriatefor the university to take political action,and then I heard that not doing anything isoosicnosic* musicTHE DEPARTMENT OF MUSICpresents:Thursday, October 31 - Noontime Concert Series12:15 p.m., Goodspeed Recital HallSusan van Vleet, piano and Valerie Bennett, pianoMusic by Brahms, Beethoven, Debussy and Ravel.Admission is free.Thursday, October 31 * HALLOWEEN CONCERTS IN THE YEAROF HALLEY S COMETUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA8:00 p.m., Out-of-this-world Children’s Concert9:30 p.m., Gustav Holst, The PlanetsMandel Hall for both performances.Barbara Schubert, conductor.Admission: $1.00 Costumes are encouraged.Friday, November 1 - Duo Geminiani8:00 p.m., Mandel HallStanley Ritchie, baroque violin; and Elizabeht Wright, harpsichord;with Anner Bylsma, baroque cello.Legrenzi; Sonata “La Cetra” op. 10, no. 4 for violin, cello and con-tinuo: Veracini: Sonata in b minor, op. 1 for violin and continuo;Vivaldi: Sonata in e minor, F XIV no. 5 for cello and continuo; Bach:Sonata in G, BWV 1019 for violin and harpsichord obligato; Bach:Suite No. 1 in G, BWV 1007 for unaccompanied cello; F. Couperin:4eme Concert in e minor from Concerts Royaux.Tickets: $10, UC student $6 remaining tickets for this concert will beavailable at Mandel Hall one hour before performance time.Series tickets are still available, 962-8068.A Memorial ServiceEdward E. Lowinsky(January 12,1908 - October 11,1985)the Ferdinand Schevill Distinguished ^Service Professorin the Department of Musicwill be held on ^Tuesday, October 29th at 5:00 p.m., ^in Bond Chapel ^ttasionusiofiusicgp not a political action. It seems to me whatthat assumes is that the present is alwaysthe norm, so that only moving away fromwhat is is political, but you have to have ar¬rived at where you are by doing something.Investment is a highly political decision andthe whole basis of that politics is that we ap¬prove of the American political and eco¬nomic system in South Africa. Indeed, whenwe invest we are part of it, and there is noway not to be part of it until we divest. Wedon’t have to keep on doing something justbecause we did it yesterday...that is not theway society has grown and changed,” shesaid.While student reaction seemed to largelyfavor Davis, it was not unanimous. Thecommon complaint against Gray was thatshe spoke too vaguely about specific Uni¬versity investment policies and “talked alot without saying too much”, as one femalefreshman put it.But at least a few people felt that the uni¬versity is trying to be a responsible investorand one third-year student admitted he felt“Gray’s argument was, if not completelyconvincing, well thought-out and entirelyrational”.Greenstonecontinued from page onelectual richness that is our hallmark”.“The situation facing us in regard to grad¬uate enrollments is a threat to the existenceof the University as we have known it. Itshould be recognized as such, and the re¬sponse should be commensurate with therecognition of that threat.” The Bradburncommittee offered five responses to thisthreat.1. Expanding the professionalschools,2. Increasing the number of masterslevel programs,3. Reducing the overall size of theUniversity,4. Increasing graduate student aid toattract potential graduate studentsand,5. Expanding the College.The Bradburn committee dismissed thefirst two responses as “unsatisfactory.” Ex¬panding the professional schools would pro¬duce the desired 8,000 students, but it wouldalter the balance between the professionalschools and the graduate divisions. The Uni¬ versity would have to expand faculty and fa¬cilities. The range of research and instruc¬tion would be limited, probably resulting ina reduction in the College size.Increasing the number of masters pro¬grams seemed implausable because the de¬mand was not there.The committee warned that the remain¬ing three responses had “disadvantagesand advantages that should be carefullyweighed by the faculty.”A reduction in the overall size of the Uni¬versity would allow the Administration tobe more admission-selective, and avoid in¬creased facility costs. However, its fatalflaw was an implied reduction of facultysize which “would reduce the richness anddiversity of the University and even furtherreduce the opportunities to hire new juniorfaculty.”The committee believed an increase ingraduate student aid to reduce the decline. in graduate student enrollment to be “at¬tractive,” but the “riskiest” of responses.“It would maintain the strength of the grad¬uate programs, a high-quality student body,and a large enough faculty to preserve ourintellectual richness.” However, a increasein aid would not guarantee an increase inenrollment but would place an added finan¬cial burden on the University itself.The Bradburn committee’s fifth responsecalled for an expansion of the College:“Expanding the College would ap¬pear to be the path of least resistance,especially since we seem to be mak¬ing progress in attracting a greaternumber of high quality undergradu¬ates. But of all the response, it is po¬tentially the most radical in its effecton the University because it reversesthe historic relation between the divi¬sions and the College. If a structuredcurriculum, faculty-taught courses,and small class size are to be main¬tained as standards, the faculty mustalter the distribution of its teaching.If there is greater recourse to gradu¬ate students as teachers in elementa¬ry or lower-level courses, one of theimportant aspects of the Chicago Col¬lege may be lost, and we may becomeless attractive to students. Eitherway, the distinctive character of theCollege and the University will belost.”The remaining four articles in this serieswill examine the direction the Universitydecided to take and the consequences oftheir actions.University of Chicago Folk Dancers23rd InternationalFOLK DANCEFESTIVALNovember 1 -3,1985Sunny Gym, Lab School5823 S. KenwoodDance Workshops with Music Workshops withDick Crum - Balkan Ljubo ManasijevicAndOr CZOmpO-Hunsanan ..p, -i ij Jim StoynoffDavid Henry creek 1 - Serbian- Greek & Middle EasternFolk ConcertSaturday, November 2, 8:00 PMMandall Hall, 1131 E. 5>th St. Festival TicketsGeneral StudentFeaturing:UkrainaWakayagi ShiyuFlatley Brothersand others Taiko DrummersSerbian YouthEnsembleBalkanske IgrePost-Concert PartySaturday, 10.00 PM, Sunny Gym,featuring outstanding live music WeekendSaturday onlyIndividual eventConcertPartySyllabusFor more information:John (312) 324-1247Tom (312) 363-5214The Chicago Maroon—Tuesday, October 29, 1985—3The Chi'v; v*:g' ^Student Newspaper of Maroonrsity of ChicagoFlipping negatives,Gray wins debateBy Ken ArmstrongStaff WriterOne rule of newspaper design is that peo¬ple in pictures should never be looking offthe page. It is a rigid rule, and as such it isoccasionally impossible to follow absentsome creative, extra-ethical maneuvering,a.k.a. cheating.As a last resort, therefore, newspaperdesigners have sometimes been known tocreate visual white lies by flippingnegatives. Left becomes right; rightbecomes left. If utilized cautiously, e.g. withpictures containing no letters, the practiceusually goes undetected thus extricating thedesigner from an otherwise impossibletask.At last Tuesday’s divestment debate.University President Hanna Gray flippedher own negative. And it worked. Beautiful¬ly-The setting substantively pitted leftagainst right. Gray, against divestment, oc¬cupied stage right. Stage left, arguing fordivestment, were Jennifer Davis, executivedirector of the American Committee onSouth Africa, and seemingly the entire au¬dience.Gray won.What was truly ironic, however, was themanner in which she won. Gray usedliberalism as a sword to paradoxically cutdown the left. The left, meanwhile, with noapparent explanation, muddled along in aquagmire of conservatism. .And no, I hadn’t gone cross-eyed. Rather,the people arguing for divestment had left avoid in their position into which Gray quick¬ly jumped. They had forgotten thatliberalism is much more than a fluctuatingset of “truths”; more importantly, it is amethod of reaching such truths. These peo¬ple had adopted the stance but forgotten thestyle.Liberalism, in a romantic sense, is arootless approach emphasizing interplay inthe free market of ideas. True liberals arenomads who never become so attached toone truth or set of truths that they cannotdisentangle themselves, and thus absolutelyreject all competing ideas. Conservatives,on the other hand, prefer stability and hardlines. Growth requires a foundation, so theydefend their roots vigorously. Certain in¬stitutions consequently become fortresses,e.g. religion and patriotism.At the debate, many of the divestment ad¬vocates acted like a stereotyped version of“The Ugly Conservative.” They werenarrow-minded and actually indignant thatsomeone could possibly reach a “truth”other than their own. Every question from the audience wasdirected to Gray, none to Davis. Most ofthose questions were framed in self-professed hopes of demonstrating to Graythat hard lines need be drawn somewhere,that her approach invited inconsistency.Her typical response, paraphrased, wasbeautifully liberal:“There are very few- purities in the world... you’re defining a spectrum with too fewalternatives ... I wish I could be so sure ofmy view’s as you seem to be of yours...”Disregarding the stance itself, everythingabout Gray exhibited classical liberalism.She consented to debate in a forum whereshe would obviously be defending a very un¬popular opinion. She was the embodiment offlexibility, adroitly side-stepping the hardlines demanded of her. She even knew how¬to “liberally” brush aside the rigid in-dignance of her more abrasive questioners.When one audience member aired out along-winded thesis so wrought with confu¬sion that it may have contained anywherefrom zero to 10 questions, Gray respondedappropriately: “I don’t believe that was aquestion.” (Pause) “But I respect yourviewpoint.” (Translation: “Shut up” - ClintEastwood goes to college.)I disagreed with just about everything shesaid. But I loved the way she said it.The left, however, had largely the op¬posite effect except that it substantivelyfailed to address Gray’s primary contention- that universities should not subjectthemselves to political winds, fromwhichever direction they’re blowing. The“liberals” were epitomized by SahotraSarkar, who two weeks ago had thebrilliantly childish idea of staging a two-dayhunger strike. I doubt anyone was terriblyconcerned. A few hunger pangs do not amartyr make.While waiting in line to ask his question,Sarkar had the look of a gleeful spotlightneophyte. He knew he was on stage. Whathe didn’t know was how to disguise thatknowledge, sporadically cracking an¬ticipatory grins as he looked out at the au¬dience. Gray calmly answered his three¬pronged question without indicting her posi¬tion, just as she had answered all the others.When people were filing out after thedebate, the air seemed full of frustration aswell as indignation. They had expectedsome kind of qualified victory, a humilia¬tion of the University president. But theydidn’t get it.Gray threw a mirror at the left and itforgot to duck. It couldn’t. In frenzied self¬infatuation it wanted loo much to admire itsreflection. The result was Narcissus, hisface a blood-red highway map. picking uppieces of shattered glass.The Chicago MaroonThe Chicago Maroon is the official student newspaper of the University of Chicago.It is published twice weekly, on Tuesdays and Fridays.Mail subscriptions are available for $24 per year.The Maroon welcomes letters and other contributions from students, faculty, staff,and others. Anyone interested in doing writing, photography, or other work for theMaroon should stop by our office, Ida Noyes rooms 303 and 304, 1212 E. 59th Street,Chicago, Illinois, 60637. Phone: 962-9555.Rosemary BlinnEditor in ChiefChris HillManaging EditorHilary TillSenior News EditorKaren E. AndersonDevelopment EditorPaul SongSports EditorMichael KellyPhotography Editor Terry TrojanekViewpoints EditorStephan LauTuesday Features EditorSusie BradyProduction ManagerPaul RohrCopy EditorAlex ConroyCalendar EditorGeoff SherryCollege News Editor Stephanie BaconGrey City Journal EditorGideon D’ArcangeloChicago Literary Review EditorPaul LuhmannAdvertising ManagerRuth MauriAdvertising ManagerJoe BarnoskyBusiness ManagerJaimie WeihrichOffice ManagerAssociate Editors: Elizabeth Brooks, Kathy Evans, Molly McClain, Ciaran OBroinStaff: Arzou Ahsan, Ken Armstrong, Lupe Becceril, Tony Berkley, Scott Bernard,Mike Carroll, Dennis Chansky, Tom Cox, David Feige, Ben Forest, Michael Gorman,Kelly Hayford, Jon Herskovitz, Ann Keen, Lauren Kriz, Lara Langner, Marcia Lehm-berg, Meg Liebezeit, Charles Lily, Jean Lyons, David McNulty, Frank Michaels, Me¬lissa Moore, Lauren Murphy, Rob Nadelson, Karin Nelson, Larry Peskin, Phil Pol¬lard, Terry Rudd, Kristin Scott, Matt Schaefer, Rick Senger, Frank Singer, SueSkufca, Larry Stein, Frances Turner.Contributors: David Au, Craig Blackstone, Nick Charles, Matthew Christopher, Mi¬chael Fell, Andy Forsaith, Nick Lanyi, Matthew Lenoe, Erik Leiber, Matt Nicker¬son. the oucsr.o/u /smt "arc -Mr iziGht fat, <aou?“ the oucst.om ,sAreSUNCUASses Eon thatGLAThNG /JiCAPACAJAN SUMsemi-Automatic ueotAuiTtAFOR use. ACA'MST SLAVICMANIACS AMD F30RGET .CurT'MO, mCmoeRS OFCOMCJZFSSiWjDtV FOP VEmDCAaciESlire south robe A, chile,Tut PumfP'peS. ere.pheslots fok. c<x>c>LiTTLE TOMTRAS uteniOAN flag - so as. motTO 8£ CONFUSED CJ’TH A7EgB93j*t'etfAJBtJ foWiD.gJTIA T&UfJDl POU STuOBORjjCO+aAa*\AtJ0AL Foz Aj£LrrfaLii"J4i'm/Wsh, ntpeEss'ue, hilitazv■Dictators.(COMMUH' ST0UCS,OF contst )3CJIL.D-A- Don a KITS. fexi FRENDlV DEUELCPiMC,,TRUD CJOBlX) kIATOMS.o Jj o U Vo 0ck ycM doopcet gjodl*2& M?[ yoM Hik* 4© ^tn«u4r<S7!lc£« w Kada/<cIfo an A' Aoosg}caur) you efcrmk MeaoCfflm wv<o4Ihoiuri gjeiQiing felke runs/if So,I-©®®-PATRIOTClinics not just for abortionsTo the Editor:In your issue dated 17 October you ran anarticle dealing with the arrest of UC stu¬dents for obstructing the entrance of an“abortion clinic.” The article then dealtwith the participants’ expressions of self-righteousness at having “saved a life” andwillingness to be arrested fifty times, if nec¬essary, in order to accomplish such a feat.You’ll please notice that I have put the ex¬pressions “abortion clinic” and “saved alife” in quotation marks. I do this because,according to the Supreme Court, abortion islegal and therefore regardless of my or any¬one else’s personal opinion to the contrary,abortion is not murder in any legal sense,nor is there any life, according to the court,to be saved.I do not wish here to talk about abortionperse because I believe it is a very complexissue, and though it may be very easy forwhite middle class young men to sloganizethat “abortion is murder” and picket gyne¬cological clinics, it has been a part of West¬ern culture long before it was ever lega¬lized, and deals with issues which cannot fitso easily onto a picketer’s placard.The issue I woud like to discuss is muchnarrower. These clinics which are picketedand “blockaded” do far more than performabortions. They also provide pap smears,birth control, pre-natal care, and also theblood tests necessary to obtain a marriage license. These clinics provide gynecologicaltreatment in a price-range for those womenwho cannot afford the high cost of MichiganAvenue gynecologists and obstetricians. Itwould be more practical for the “pro-life”movement, instead of deterring womenfrom using these clinics, to encourage themto visit before they have an unwanted preg¬nancy in order to make use of the birth con¬trol options available. In terms of thosewomen who are pregnant, they might wantto work with the clinics, in order to spreadinformation regarding adoption, and othersuch measures.Abortion has existed for centuries, if notlonger. Banning abortion would only resultin the rich having it done in Europe, and thepoor returning to the back-alleys and kitch¬ens (often dying from the procedure). Re¬ducing abortion to a crime will not elimi¬nate the problem in an issue so complex,that has persisted so long. Aside from themedically warranted abortions, in order totruly prevent abortions one must stop themat their roots. These are as complex as theissue, and I do not know what all of themare. What I do know is that correcting themwould be a lot more difficult than picketingclinics and changing a law but in the longrun I believe infinitely more rewarding.Perhaps beyond saving the life of a fetus,one could perhaps also save the life of itsmother and father.S.A. BergstromDawn speaks for herselfTo the Editor:I am a person named Dawn who resentsbeing confused these days with the Dawn-who-speaks-for-all-girls. I have not seen theletter written by this particular personnamed Dawn, but I have recently experi¬enced enough misdirected flack to respondto the public reaction generated by said let¬ter.Let me point out that not all personsnamed Dawn base sexist opinions upon thelimited experience of their own hindquarters. Let me also point out that at leastone person named Dawn has been known to commit the same vulgar atrocity onmembers of the opposite sex as that whichthis other person named Dawn accusesmembers of the opposite sex of committingon her.Please folks, don’t assume that personswho share the same name share the sameset of beliefs and desires. Like every minor¬ity, we persons named Dawn are victims ofexcessive generalizations, and I wish to callthis unacknowledged though heinous injus¬tice to the attention of the community.Thank you.Defensively yours,Dawn, who speaks for herselfMaroon editorial policyAll letters and viewpoints must be submit¬ted to the Maroon office, room 303 in IdaNoyes.Letters and viewpoints must be typed anddouble spaced. The Maroon reserves theright to decide what material to publish.All letters and viewpoints are subject tostandard editing for grammar, length, clar¬ity and libelous content Letters should h? no longer than 300 words. All letters must besigned by the author and contain the au¬thor s address and phone number for verifi¬cation. The name of the author may be with¬held upon request.Signed editorials and commentaries rep¬resent the opinions of the author. Unsignededitorials represent the concensus of the ed¬itorial board.4—The Chicago Maroon—Tuesday, October 29, 1985Transcript of Gray/Davis divestment debateThis is a transcript of Tuesday’s debatebetween Jennifer Davis, executive directorof the American Committee on Africa andHanna Gray, president of the University ofChicago. The Maroon thanks Faculty for Di¬vestment from South Africa for this tran¬scription of tapes of that debate.The texts have been punctuated, a veryfew clarifications that seemed necessaryhave been added in parentheses, but other¬wise nothing has been altered.The Maroon will be running the text of thesubsequent question-and-answer period andclosing statement in Friday’s issue.JENNIFER DAVISI should say “thank you” for inviting meto speak here. I have to say, truthfully, thatit makes me very sad to be here speaking onthe subject of should this university divestfrom South Africa, should it join the world¬wide movement to fight apartheid by usingeconomic pressures. It makes me sad be¬cause I was here perhaps four years agomaking exactly the same arguments. Manyuniversities, many states, many cities havechosen to act. It upsets me deeply that thisissue is still being debated here. I don’tthink this is really a subject for this kind ofdebate anymore. Last time I came to de¬bate, President Gray was here and also Sen¬ator Clark, who had been the chairperson ofthe Senate subcommittee on Africa, whohad a study that looked at the role of US in¬vestment in South Africa and had just re¬cently reported on it, and they had foundthat, in fact, US corporations, in their func¬tioning in Soifth Africa, propped up thewhole apartheid system, and so there wasreally evidence from within the system, aswell as what might be regarded as our, afterall rater radical perspective, that US invest¬ment, foreign investment, was helping toprop up the system of apartheid.And, nevertheless, although I think thatthat was an argument that we made thenwith great force and continue to do, we areback again, and so be it. I’m not an enter¬tainer, and I don’t have any new act for you.Some of you will have heard this act before.Prexy will have heard it often. There aren’t,I think, any new arguments. What there issince I was here last time is a great deal ofhistory. And the history is bloody. The histo¬ry demonstrates that what we are seeing inSouth Africa is a passionate demand for lib¬eration by the people and an intransigenceby the state, a refusal to meet that demandin any way except by repression. We areseeing a history which shows clearly thatapartheid is not being reformed out of exis¬tence. There’s enough of Botha’s speechesand enough pictures on your TV of deadchildren for me really not to have a belaborthat point. Clearly, one person-one vote in aunitary state in South Africa is not on theagenda as far as the apartheid system isconcerned, as far as the members of thegovernment are concerned, and even as faras many of the white businessmen who arenow talking about some form of reform areconcerned.I think there is enough evidence to callvery seriously into question the argument“Oh come on, we all agree that apartheid isbad, apartheid is horrible, we want to getrid of it, what we are arguing about is tac¬tics”. I don’t think we are arguing abouttactics. I think that what we have come toargue about now, is about our responsibilityfor people’s lives. And I think the evidenceis clear—there aren’t two ways to the sameend-. The one way, the way of staying, ofleaving our investments there, of continuingto make loans means helping to perpetuatethe system. The other way, putting as muchas we can of the flow of dollars out, puttingas much economic pressure on the system,means challenging the system, means help¬ing to weaken the state, means evening upthe balance of forces between the peoplewho are struggling for their freedom andthe state. There’s a favorite anti-divestmentargument which is often used, that is, “Oh,if we have divestment leading to disinvest¬ ment, that is going to lose jobs, and it willhurt black people. Dosane (?) Kumalo, whois himself a South African and who workswith me on the divestment campaign,always comments on that that it’s amazinghow they love black people more than welove ourselves. Because, in fact, if you lookat what’s happening in South Africa, peoplehave gone much further than risking losingtheir jobs in the struggle to be free. Theyare dying, quite literally they are dying tobe free. And at the same time, they are con¬stantly risking their jobs by the forms of po¬litical action that they take—nationalstrikes, stay-at-homes, days of protest.There is no pure economic strike in SouthAfrica any more. The strike is a weapon ofpolitical protest, and when you go on strikeyou risk losing your job. And many thou¬sands of people have lost tneir jobs. So peo¬ple inside are sending a very clear message,and that is that this struggle is for them alife and death matter. And on the question ofwhat we should do they’re also very clear.From across the board, from the tradeunion organizations like FOSATU, frompeople like Bishop Tutu, who I heard deli¬vering a message by telephone to IndianaUniversity two or three weeks ago, whichwas debating exactly the same thing, wherehe told them that there is no time left forthings like the Sullivan principles, what weneed is short, sharp action to bring theSouth African government to its senses.There are polls in South Africa now, show¬ing broad, popular support. What people in¬side are saying now is, you must maintainthe economic pressure, and you must buildthe economic pressure. It has to be intensi¬fied, not weakened. So, if there are so manyblack and progressive white voices callingfor divestment, disinvestment pressures,then who argues that it’s bad for black peo¬ple. Well, interestingly enough, it’s theSouth African government. They’re veryconcerned that you shouldn’t hurt blackpeople by divesting, and it’s the South Afri¬can government employees, like Buthelezi,the so-called leader of the Zulu people, a to¬tally unelected, government appointed lead¬er. And it’s the corporations. And those arethe main voices making that argument. Sowho do you believe, the slave or the slave-master, when you discuss the question ofeliminating slavery? Or are we arguing, re¬ally, that blacks are too ignorant to knowwhat is good for them in South Africa?I said there were no new arguments. Per¬haps it’s good to look briefly at some of theold ones. On the one side, there’s the generalargument that economic growth will bringchange. I’ve heard that as long as I’ve beenaround. When I went to university, I wastaught by Helen Suzman, who I think has avery fine record on some human rightsissues, but is a lousy economist. And sheperpetually was pushing this argument,that economic growth will lead to the with¬ering away of apartheid. And (she) wasalso, I must say, pretty bad in history. Andlinked to that, of course, is the argumentthat more participation of US corporations,the US corporate presence, can lead tochange, particularly through things like theSullivan codes of conduct. Now, I thinkthat’s naive. I think that the whole history ofSouth Africa in the last two hundred yearsshows that the development of apartheid,the development of segregation, goes alongwith industrialization, with the flow into thecountry of foreign capital, first for the de¬velopment of diamonds and gold, and thenfor industrialization. And I can’t explicatethat now, but I think that there are lots ofpeople here who can do that for you if you’reinterested. (I think) that the pattern isclear, and apartheid is a structure designedto provide cheap labor and that it does that.It delivers cheap labor to the factories, tothe farms, to the mines, cheap labor whichis controlled by things like the pass laws.And (I think) that that was very deliberate¬ly designed. So apartheid is not only racismmasked, but it was deliberately designed toproduce an exploitable, cheap black laborforce. And it is quite clear, that as that sys¬tem was being developed, particularly thecodified system of apartheid since 1948, UScorporations moved into the country andsettled down and flourished, and foundthemselves in a position that was not in con¬tradiction with, or incompatible with thesystem of apartheid. Now one of the ques¬tions you’ve asked me is: “If the US eco¬nomic presence will not lead to the end ofapartheid, can withdrawal, in fact, impactthe other way, can divestment, disinvest¬ment be effective?” And I think the argu¬ment is, the position is, “yes,” quite clearly.I’m not claiming that it will lead to an im¬mediate end to apartheid, the total crum¬bling of the economy. I think we have to lookat that in a dynamic perspective and seethat, in fact, what we’re looking at is aprocess that is on the move in South Africa.And I heard other people say this at therally and at other sessions today, that thepeople of South Africa are moving and thatwhat we are doing when we begin to put in¬ternational economic pressures on SouthAfrica is to help that process. South African liberation will not come from divestment,but it will be supported by and assisted by it,and it is a form of assistance which mayhelp to cut the periods of struggle and vio¬lence through which people are being forcedto go. So that it’s significant in the context ofmany pressures.Now again, there isn’t time to go into de¬tail about the importance of foreign invest¬ment, and particularly US investment in theSouth African economy—which proves whyyou have an impact if you pull it out. Andagain I think there are lots of people here atthe University of Chicago and in Chicagowho know the answers to that in great de¬tail, if you want to know more. So let meskim very quickly over some of the majorfeatures of that. US investment in SouthAfrica is in very critical areas of the econ¬omy. It accounts for about 25% of foreign in¬vestment-foreign investment has alwaysbeen important in developing the South Af¬rican economy. One of our great prime min¬isters, Prime Minister Vorster, once de¬scribed every new bank loan, every newinvestment, as a brick in the wall of contin¬ued survival. And I think that’s accurate.It’s focused in very critical areas, and I’lltouch on only three of them—lots of US in¬vestment in the computer history, in the oilindustry, in the motor industry. Now, if youthink about those, all of those sectors areclearly very important for the survival of astate which is seeking to control a big popu¬lation which does not wish to be controlled.Let’s look at the computers. Some 50% ofcomputer industry, at least in South Africa,is controlled by US corporations, writing asort of memory bank for apartheid. IBM,for instance, over the years has sold to ev¬erybody, to all the government depart¬ments, to the Defense Force, to the AtomicEnergy Board, to the Prime Minister’s of¬fice. IBM even once admitted in a Congressional hearing that they had bid on the passlaw equipment. They’ve tended, you know,IBM, when you say “You supply equipmentfor population control.” (to) say “Yes, butnot the pass laws.” But at the hearing itcame out that not the pass laws was ’causethey lost the bid to a British company. So, inother words, IBM has been willing to sell tothe South Africans up to the level that thelaw will allow them, and the law is US law,and today US law has allowed them a greatdeal of latitude. And when US law was beingproposed, when there were proposals tochange the law under President Carter,IBM, Control Data, and the other computercompanies lobbied very’ hard against thechanges. They didn’t want any interferencein where they could sell. Control Data has asimilar record. In fact, in 1982 Control Datasold to the Council on Scientific and Indus¬trial Research, w’hich is South Africa’s pri¬mary military defense and/or other aspectsof society research laboratory, a computerwhich was so powerful that the Pentagon dramatic. They start running around andtalking about “Well maybe we’ll allowblack South Africans to have citizenship.Now we don’t mean a vote, of course.” I’mnot suggesting that what we are seeing inSouth Africa is a revolution, is the beginningof the end of apartheid. But what I do thinkwe’re seeing is the impact that threateningthis flow of constant dollars and support hason them. It does have an impact when youbegin to pull it away, both psychological andactual, actually real in terms of cutting offcritical things that they need. Now I wantyou to look, in contrast, very quickly at thepolicy that’s being recommended to you.It’s based on the belief, as I’ve said before,that corporations’ staying can help eradi¬cate apartheid by adhering to a code of con¬duct. Let me remind you that under the Sul¬livan code signatory companies can get atop ranking even if they sell oil to the gov¬ernment, even if they sell computers formilitary equipment, even if they pay taxesto the South African government that, inci¬dentally, come off the taxes that they payhere; so that we’re all of us subsidizing theSouth African government, even if they en¬dorse the pass laws and operate the passlaws. You can be a top Sullivan signatoryand do all of that. Let me also remind youthat the first set of Sullivan principles weredrawn up in response to a great deal of pres¬sure from divestment campaigns here, andthey were drawn up with the consent of theSouth African government and with somehand by members of the South African gov¬ernment in their final shaping. And whatthey were were basically a workplace codethat said “We will have equal opportunity inthe workplace, we will have no segregationin the workplace.” They did not at all beginto address the whole question of apartheid,and trade unions inside South Africa havecondemned them very strongly as polishingour chains, not getting rid of them. I thinkit’s fairly clear that the corporations histor¬ically have only gotten on board with theSullivan principles as a way of diffusingpressure against them; in fact. Dresser In¬dustries, one of the more honest companiestold one of the groups that monitors such be¬havior that “We signed because it might,”and I quote, “take the heat off some of thecrazy divestment legislation.”Now I don’t want to get into intricacies ofadherence to the Sullivan principles, be¬cause I basically think, that whether you ad¬here to the Sullivan principles or you don't,you’re not solving the problem of South Afri¬ca. But I do want to comment on somethingwhich I find a bit disturbing about the wayChicago University has shaped its policy inrelation to the Sullivan principles, becauselooking at what has been said here lately, itseems to me that even the inadequate cri¬teria stated are not really being adhered to.In a May letter, which somebody sent me.which appeared in, I believe it was the“In fact, if you look at what’s happening in South Africa,people have gone much further than risking losing their jobsin the struggle to be free. They are dying, quite literally theyare dying to be free.” —Jennifer Davisprotested. So it’s clear that the relationshipbetween Control Data, the computer com¬panies, and the South African state is extre¬mely close. On the other hand, the kind ofjobs that are created by the presence ofthose companies are minimal. IBM has lessthan 20% of its work force doing any kind ofwork that is not white, and I say that be¬cause I don’t know the exact breakdown.There are coloreds, so-called coloreds. Afri¬cans, and Inidans on the IBM work force-all together that makes up the black compo¬nent. With Control Data, it’s 75.9% white;there are 10.5% Africans. In other words,these are high-skilled, high-tech jobs and,therefore, there is no place for blackworkers in those sectors. If you look at theoil industry you see a somewhat differentpicture in terms of employment. In terms ofnumbers there are more black workers, butif you look at where they are in the position,they're always at the bottom of the pile. Andif you think about the role of oil in SouthAfrica, in keeping the whole system work¬ing. in supplying oil for the trucks to takethe police, to take the army into the ghettosto shoot up on the people, you can see howsupplying oil to South Africa, whatever,however many jobs you create, is not a goodidea In the last few years we have managedto create an atmosphere, a tension, whichshows that you can impact on South Africaby pulling out this extraordinary flow ofwealth and technology’. If you look at what’shappened in the last few months, the combi¬nation of internal events, external pres¬sures, has meant things like, for instance,the cut-off of bank credits by Chase Manhat¬tan and others in the middle of the year. Andthe response of the South African govern¬ment, of the South African business commu¬nity, is very interesting because it’s veryTheC! Maroon, from President Gray, the state pol¬icy is, and again I quote, “We’ll invest onlyin companies that act in accordance withthe Sullivan principles. ” Well, I guess I sup¬pose the lawyers among you immediatelyrecognize that that language didn’t actuallysay sign; but I gather most of you. not beinglawyers, thought it meant that you now hada policy that you would not invest in any UScompany active in South Africa which wasnot a Sullivan signatory. It turns out thatthis University invests in companies thathaven't signed on to Sullivan, and that thisis justified by saying.” Well, they performas though they have.” Now I think it’s an in¬teresting question, “who say’s they per¬form?” I know only one other group apartfrom the Sullivan signatory group that doesmonitoring, the Arthur D. Little CompanyThey didn’t monitor, and the group in Wash¬ington says they didn’t monitor, so I don’tknow where the information comes fromthat they’re performing. I don’t want tolabor the point, except that I think it raisesdisturbing questions about the seriousnessof the policy and the degree of concern thatmotivates policy.But let me conclude, because I see I havetwo minutes, by coming back to your threequestions. Is divestment an effective weap¬on against apartheid? I think the short an¬swer is, yes. and that it is heard by bothsides in South Africa. And, going one stepfurther, it begins to impact, actually, on thereality of South Africa. Two, the philosophi¬cal question, and that is, even if divestmentdoesn’t actually have an economic effect,should we do it because of the future rela¬tions, etc. I think you have to think not ofyour future relations with South Africans,and let me say that black South Africanscontinued on page 12:ago Maroon—Tuesday, October 29, 1985—5/V,The University of ChicagoThe Dean of the CollegeThe Department of Physical Education and AthleticsThe Task Force on Physical Educationannounce a lecture seriesNEW DIRECTIONS IN PHYSICALEDUCATION AND SPORTS SCIENCESTuesday, October 29 Professor Roberta Park4:30 pm Dept, of Physical Education, <,University ofCalifornia-Berkeley"Physical Education inthe ContemporaryLiberal Arts College''Tuesday, November 54:30 pm Dr. Thomas M. JonesDept, of Medicineand Director,University Health Service,University of Chicago“Exploring Issues inNutrition: The Example ofVitamin D“Tuesday, November 12 Professor Bruce KiddDept, of Physical Education,University of Toronto“Athletics, Education,and Public Policy"Lectures will be held in Bartlett Gymnasium, 5640University Avenue, and are open to all Universityfaculty, students, and staff. A reception in theBartlett Trophy Room will follow each lecture.njfim d|pim tm pThe University of ChicagoDEPARTMENT OFANATOMY SEMINARPRESENTSLECTURES ON THESTRUCTURE OF LIFESPEAKER:MARTIN FEDERTOPIC“HOW ANIMALS BREATHEWITH THEIR SKIN”DATE: Tuesday, October 29, 1985TIME: 8:00 p.m.PLACE: Anatomy, Room 104THE LECTURE IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL A UDIENCES. e\.0oA* ^For One Week OnlyOct. 27 to Nov. 29thHelp El Lugar Celebratethe 1st Anniversary ofour new Dining roomand Cantina.20%Discount off the price of your dinnerEnjoy the Best Mexicanfood you’ve ever tastedand save 20% off theprice of your dinner.Offer good on all dinnercombination plates.Monday thru Thursdayonly, 5:00 p.m. to Close.You must have aUniversity ID to takeadvantage of this offer.HOUSE SPECIALFREEMARGARITASFor groups of six or more, thefirst Margaritas are on thehouse. Simply Great TastingMexican Food.LLLutSae.MEXICAN EATS RY1601 aad 1603 E. 55th StreetChicago, IL 60637Phoae: 684-6514•—The Chicago Maroon—Tuesday, October 29, 1985October 29, 1985Life in the LimelightCraig BlackstoneOn the corner of Ontario and Dearbornsits the yet to be completed Hard Rock Cafe.Something a bit more immediate is one ofthe newer establishments on the Chicagonightclub scene. Situated in a rather eccle¬siastical looking building, Limelight is anexcellent addition to Chicago’s alreadyspectacular night life. Open since the end oflast July, Limelight is the little brother tothe New York club of the same name andthe predecessor of the soon-to-be-openedLimelight in London. The Chicago versionhas many things in common with its easternrelative and it is these things which make itunique — which make it different than anyother club in the city.There’s so much that’s different aboutLimelight that it’s hard to find a good placeto start, so maybe the building itself wouldbe a good place. Limelight inhabits what atone time was a church. At first glance, itmight be mistaken for a church, but the cru¬cifixes are gone and large black flags flyingon the facade vaulted ceilings and the manyalcoves characteristic of cathedrals. Who¬ever planned the club must have had a lot offun doing it, and he has taken what appearsto be the original floor plan and given it sucha twist that there is a little something for ev¬eryone.In the main room is the dance floor. Andwhat a floor! It’s quite large, with room fora lot of people to dance. On the sides of thefloor are little shelves where you can sit anddrink. Very convenient if you decide youwant to dance. For the more adventurous,at one end of the floor, where the main altarprobably was, is a good size stage which many people use as an elevated dance floor.Most people end up dancing on rtage atsome point in the evening. Partial^ be¬cause it’s a good deal less crowded than thtmain floor and partially because it’s a greatplace to see and be seen.Another of the many things that setsLimelight apart from the rest of Chicago’snightclubs is the way it has used the manyalcoves that were part of the old church.The club’s designer has taken these roomsand turned them into lounges. There arefour of these lounges throughout the cluband each has a character all its own.The first of these lounges is very social. Itis offset from the dance floor, so it is one ofthe first things that anyone sees. There isthe obligatory bar on the far side of theroom, but what makes this lounge unique isits size. It’s huge! There is a large amouontof space for people to get together and min¬gle. In most places, a lounge so close to thedance floor is small so people are almostforced to stay on the dance floor. Not atLimelight. These people know that there ismore to nightlight than just dancing. Theyhave seen to it that the people who comehere can get off the floor and socialize too.And they can do it in just about any environ¬ment they wish.For those who want to get away from theaction yet still stay in touch with what’sgoing on, there is another “social lounge’’on the second floor. This lounge has some¬thing no other place in Limelight can claim—bird’s eye view of both the first flooropen lounge and the dance floor. As with thelounge on the main floor, it is quite open, butin a different way. This lounge is connectedto a series of “catwalks’’ which go over thefirst floor rooms. From here everything can be seen, including the huge video screenthat is suspended over the dance floor. Ifyou so desire, you can go down the spiralstairs that lead from one balcony to the floorand you can start dancing or you can godown a different set of steps to the firstlounge.So you don’t feel like being in the crowdsand you want to sit down for a little while?Well, Limelight can take care of you. Justoff the first floor lounge is what could becalled “The Pool Room.” It is so called be¬cause of the seascape paintings on the wallswith their sunbathers and their scantilyclad bodies. Adding to the effect is the aqua¬marine colour scheme. This lounge has a video screen and a sound system all its own.It has lots of overstuffed wall couches andglass tables on which to set your drink. Aswith the other lounges, the Pool Room hasits own bar. As with the other lounges, thisroom is rather social, but much less so thanthe others. If you want something a bit moreintimate, the V.I.P. Lounge is for you.The V.I.P. Lounge is located on the sec¬ond floor to one side of the lounge, and itlends itself to privacy. Unlike Limelight’sother lounges, this one has no bar. but that'sokay, it doesn’t need one. The room decor isbasic black. It has several small tables sur¬rounded by black furniture. The only lightscontinued on page nineAdam Green: Original Big Man on CampusMichael CarroiIf ever there was a Big Man on Campusduring the last four years, it was AdamGreen. A member of Psi-U and a basketballplayer he fit the stereo-typic BMOC modelas closely as any U of C student could. Hegraduated from the College in 1985 with aBA in American History, and he is currentlythe Assistant to the Dean of Students in theUniversity.I first met Adam on the third or fourth dayof Orientation Week in 1981. He was tossinga frisbee around in the middle of the Quads,and I joined in. Being the free style frisbeedilettantes that we were, we tried and failedto impress each other with our respective moves. We never hung out with the samecrowd, but we have remained friendly ac¬quaintances ever since.Adam was always a bit hit at parties be¬cause of his dancing he clearly had style.What really clinched his BMOC status wasan incident at a party during Autumn of1984. The music had been steady funk, a laGrandmaster Flash, for forty-five minutesstraight. Some suggested a change of paceand someone else turned around and said,“No way, Adam’s dancing great. C’mongive him some room.”To his credit, however, he never let it goto his head — at least not for long — and byhis senior year, it was evident that he haddistanced himself from the Always-ready-to-party, Mr. Good Time image. He had be¬come another Serious Student. That’s aBMOC U of C style.As Assistant to the Dean of Students,Adam spends most of his time performing avariety of bureaucratic tasks for CharlesO’Connell. His duties include spelling outthe University’s iron-clad policy regardinghealth insurance waivers to flustered grad¬uate students and acting as the Administra¬tion’s contact with the various Anti-Apartheid groups.MC: Did you feel like a big man oncampus?AG: It’s funny. I have an anecdote foryou. Frank Caesar, who is a classmate ofours tells this one relating to this AdamGreen’s visibility kind of issue. Someonehad raised his interest in this guy, AdamGreen, and Frank was like, “Who is thisguy? I want to see him.” He steadfastlymaintains — though I swear I don’t re¬member, and it would be an incredibly ob¬noxious thing to do — that during the winterquarter Breckinridge party, 1 walked indressed to the hilt and meandered throughthe dance floor saying, ‘Hey, how’s it going’to everyone And 1 walked up and said. ‘Hello Francis, how are you?’ And Frankwas like, ‘Who is this guy? Who does hethink he is?’MC: Did you plan to become a BMOC?AG: I’m not sure. People say... and thiswas a lot more prevalent when we were stu¬dents first year... they’d say (affecting theU of C griping monotone), ‘Well, it gets real¬ly cold here and it’s dreary and people don’tlike to do anything and all anybody does isstudy. So it’s really not a lot of fun.’ And Isaid to myself, ‘Well, I’m going to see if it’snot a lot of fun,’ and I proceeded to overex¬tend myself. Finally, I realized that therewas an order of priorities going on, andclearly I would have to devote most of mytime to my studies. But my freshmanyear... I can’t understand how anyone couldstudy in a dorm room. I could never do it,but I tried. Everyone talks about Regen-stein. I never went. I didn’t spend two con¬secutive nights in the Reg until the middleof winter quarter, freshman year.“Everyone talks aboutRegenstein. I never went.”My first experience with Ex-Libris coffeeshop... I’ll confess this... this is classic. Sun¬day before winter quarter finals week. I’vegot this twenty page, data-analysis paper todo. 1 figure I’m going to the Regenstein forten hours and do this paper, period. Well Iwent to the Reg all right.. I spent six and ahalf hours in Ex-Libris! That was one of thestupidest things I did. 1 ended up churningthe paper out from midnight to four in theafternoon. Everybody pulls all-nightershere, but that had to be the most pitiful, ri¬diculous and silly one I’ve ever heard of.Anyway, going back to fun...MC: How did you like dorm life9 and it was great. When it came time to dothe lottery for second year, I had these highhopes for a four-person suite that I coulddraw the people I wanted into. As it turnedout, by the time they got to me there wasonly one room left that was at all desirable.It was basically a two room suite for threepeople. It had a big. big living room and adorm-size bedroom for the three of us,which was cramped as hell. I lived withNewton HaH. who was a Howell-Murray re¬cipient. and a freshman, Joe Buvone.We did fine for about a quarter and a half,but then we really started to impose on eachother’s space. Newton was making collagesand putting them up everywhere because hewanted art in the room. Joe was picking upon that theme and started saving all hisCoke cans, and Joe drank Coke religiously,so we had between one and two hundredcoins in the room. And I guess I was comingin late and playing music loudly.Anyway, in the middle or winter quarter Isaid, ‘Enough.’ I moved my bed out into theliving room and agreed with my roommatesthat they could use the room whenever theywanted to. My privacy was essentially nilhowever.MC: What was the wildest thing you did atthe U of C?AG: The wildest thing? Man, you’re goingto get me into trouble here. I can’t tell youthat; you’re going to print this. For the sakeof laundering the conversation...MC: Don’t do that. Come on, Adam,you’re not going to lose your job.AG: This is going to sound laundered, butit’s not. Just believing this job is possible isthe wildest thing. To be graduating withvery vague notions of working for a coupleof years and then to be asked to apply forthe position of Assistant to the Dean of Stu¬dents in the University is pretty wildcontinued on page eightAG: I lived in the Shoreland for two yearsThe Chicago Maroon—Tuesday, October 29. 1985—7Quote of the Week:College is a place you go to find out that it isnot you, but your parents that are screwed up.U of C Faculty MemberJagged EdgeGood vs. Evil ReconsideredMichael FellA San Francisco newspaper heiress issavagedly knifed to death and the policecharge her husband, Jack Forrester, playedby Jeff Bridges, with the murder. Was it aritual killing or was it just made to seemlike one to throw suspicion off the husband?Could a husband commit so heinous acrime? Teddy Barnes, Jack Forrester’s de¬fense lawyer played by Glenn Close, mustgrapple with the dilemma. If he is innocent,she feels duty-bound to clear him of thecharge to clear her guilty legal conscience.If he is guilty, she will be drawn into the“scum” she washed herself of years agowhen she unjustly convicted an innocentman during her days as an assistant districtattorney. Her eventual affair with Jack For¬rester complicates her legal ethics with apersonal moral stake in his innocence orguilt.Jagged Edge, which gets its name fromthe jagged knife used and the far fromclean-cut intentions of the players, is an at¬tempt to add a new twist to an old conven¬tion, the courtroom drama. Although thecourtroom is a major device, Teddy Barnesdiscovers the identity of the murderer, out¬side of the courtroom. Vascillations be¬tween Jack’s apparent guilt and innocenceAdam Greencontinued from page sevenMC: Okay, let’s turn to more serious mat¬ters. What about your experience as a blackstudent at the University of Chicago?AG: It’s difficult because there are anumber of factors that make being a blackstudent here a challenging and many timesarduous proposition. One is simply thatthere are not a lot of black students here.You’re presented with the age-old dilemmaof whether to integrate or merge and be¬come like other students, most of whom arewhite; or to actively retain your identity, toalways wear your color so to speak. I thinkthere is a middle ground between those twochoices. Unfortunately, when you’re at aUniversity where only three percent of thestudents are black, that can be a very diffi¬cult goal to reach. (Pause)I think that there was a lot that was verygood about being black on this campus. Thisis a campus that prides itself on inquiry.Being black in this country, especially inthis kind of setting where you are in a verysmall group, makes you constantly aware ofjust what the deficiencies and the problemsare and what the concerns should be in thesystem. There are universities where youcan go and get an educational experiencewholly grounded on the question of race. Idon’t think that would have been good forme.Because this University can be seeminglymerciless in its color-blindness, it forcespeople to look at the larger picture as muchas possible. I think that can go under the ru¬bric of ‘‘survival skills” for black studentsand minority professionals, which is whatmost of these minority students want to be¬come. also appear outside of a legal setting.This see-saw between ostensible inno¬cence and guilt is the major achievement ofthe film. Screenwriter Joe Eszterhas bal¬ances scenes throughout the movie so thatone scene makes us believe he is innocentwhile the next scene makes the audiencethink, “maybe this guy did kill his wife.” Ina scene where you would not believe he’sguilty. Jack spreads his wife’s ashes intothe river under the shadow of the San Fran¬cisco bridge. Director Richard Marquandmanages to conduct this scene with a seren¬ity and mournfulness which elicits sympa¬thy for Jack. A couple of scenes later, how¬ever, the district attorney is questioningJack. Jack eyes the district attorney andsays, “You think I killed my wife, prove it! ”Jack’s steely challenge seems to be an im¬modest appraisal of his own skills at cover¬ing up his crime. The audience thus shiftsinto thinking that perhaps he is guilty.The successful balance of questionableguilt and innocence produces a tension thatgives the film a dynamic quality. The audi¬ence's swinging judgement of Jack’s char¬acter effectually produces the celluloidequivalent of the book world’s acclaim of“You can’t put it down!” Director Mar¬quand, however, mars the film with court¬room cliches. The courtroom drama, a tiredand overbeaten convention, breathes toomuch of its old life in this movie. Followingthe paper with the verdict from juror toMC: What do you think of the current ef¬forts by the University to recruit minoritystudents? I mean ever since we were fresh¬men, there has been annually a meeting atwhich administrators convene to lament theappalling lack of minority representation oncampus. Meanwhile, the status quo re¬mains.AG: To some extent there is progressgoing on. The Committee on minority re¬cruitment is putting together a report thatwill be out soon. I think though that what wehad when we came in here was the Old-School approach to black students, whichwas: you provide them with services, youprovide them with a point of complaint, andyou pretty much leave them alone. Peopleare in office now who want to see the minori¬ty experience here looked at specifically.The University is coming around to seeingthat it must be more sensitive to the needsof minority students. One example is LarryHawkins’ summer program, which I thinkis really important.MC: Yeah, but wasn’t that really startedby OBS (The Organization of Black Stu¬dents)?AG: That’s the problem. These thingshave always had to be pressed in. One thingthat was partially initiated by the adminis¬tration, of course with input from the minor¬ity support groups, was the required orien¬tation meeting for minority students. This isone step in creating dialogue about whatthis experience means. I think there needsto be more. judge to court recorder is an exaggeratedattempt by Marquand to produce a tense an¬ticipation. Admittedly, the blocking ofcourtroom scenes is so engraved in celluloidthat only Marquand can follow. Any cameramovements designed to alleviate this prob¬lem can’t help but be obvious. Marquand’sbiggest slip into convention is his use of thecourtroom audience to accentuate any reve¬lations. The courtroom erupts too manytimes with “Ahs” and “Ohs,” and the gal¬lery turning to each other madly shakingtheir heads up and down. One cliche begetsanother so the judge pumps his gavel andmust announce “I will tolerate no furtherdisruption in this courtroom!”Glenn Close’s performance redeems thecliche-ridden courtroom scenes. Alternate¬ly shocked at revelations, confident of herskills, and sympathetic towards victimizedwitnesses, Close displays a range of emo¬tional talent. In her relationship with JeffBridges, she is reluctantly drawn in and isconstantly aware she might be deceived.Double IndemnityShopping forFor most of his career, Fred MacMurraydidn’t stray far from playing Steve Douglas,our favorite fifties father. (Let’s face it,Beaver’s dad let him get away with muchtoo much.) Rumor has it, however, that inthe mid-forties Universal was upset with itsaffable star. In an attempt to ruin his ca¬reer, MacMurray was loaned to rival Para¬mount to play totally against type. (Imag¬ine Bogart and Lorre switching roles in“The Maltese Falcon.”) Obviously, the loanturned out to be the best part of MacMur-ray’s career.With dark plots, dark characters, darkendings, and dark scenes, “Double Indem¬nity” is the classic film noir, and film noirwas one of Hollywood’s most successful in¬novations.In “Double Indemnity,” the leads arelovers: a suburban wife and an insuranceagent. Together, they realize that BarbaraStanwyck’s inconvenient husband holds aninsurance policy with a very convenientclause: it pays double if he’s killed. Guesswhat happens next. The heart of the film isthat someone is being used (besides the hus¬band, played by Tom Powers) but theviewer can’t be sure whom.Stanwyck has several reasons for gettingMacMurray to remove Powers from thescene, and we’re sure who’s using whom.The problem is that MacMurray soon has asmuch to lose as his erst while lover (more,since the insurance company will certainlynot pay him his commission if they findout.)And there’s the rub. The company em- She alternately distrusts and trusts Bridgesto the point of self-deception. Bridges is al¬ternately sincere and genuine enough tomake the audience hope he is innocent.(Warning: A revealed Ending!) In fact,some of the audience betrayed their feelingswith sighs of evident disappointment whenJack turned out to be the killer.Jack, the bad guy, is killed at the end byTeddy, the deceived heroine. The film, how¬ever, is not about good triumphing over evil.The bad guy is punished but the heroine suf¬fers for her goodness. Teddy Barnes, themoral and conscientious lawyer, trustsJack, but her life is shattered because she isforced into a situation where she must killhim. An end to her career, a questionablereputation, and an uncertain outlook facesTeddy. Are moral and trusting people toogullible to survive? Need one be cynical andskeptical? Jack seemed so innocent untilthe very end. Thus the question remains inthis ultimately troubling film: when do youtrust?Murderploys not only MacMurray, but also EdwardG. Robinson as a suspicious investigatorlooking into the death of the unsuspectinghusband. The movie, written and directedby Billy Wilder (with Raymond Chandlercollaborating on the script), manages tokeep us in suspense, on the edge of ourseats, worrying about what will happen tothis pair we would be happy, even eager, tosee jailed (or worse) were we to be so un¬lucky as to meet or marry them in reallife.That is the heart of the film noir. Thecharacters are not seduced or ruined. Thesemovies are not tragedies. There is no hiddenflaw which trips up otherwise exemplarycitizens. Instead, we meet people who seetheir chance, and don’t let murder get in theway. This is the story of the banality of evil.Stanwyck, whose character is the center-piece of the movie, murders to raise money,just as she travels to shop. She is no moreenamored of murder than revolted by it; itis merely the easiest way to get from pointA to point B.You will not like Stanwyck or MacMur¬ray. For a moment, you will worry aboutyour husband or wife, your insurance agent,and your friends. This is believable evil, theevil that actually lurks in the hearts of men.Perhaps that’s why you won’t leave, whyyou’ll find yourself thinking about themovie. You should see it, but watch out forthose in the audience taking notes.Playing at Law School Films, Saturday,Nov. 2 at 7:30 and 10:30, Law School Audito¬rium. $2.50 — N. Charles.The Chicago Maroon PollAre you or have you ever been involved in a political organization..Yes 40%No 60%Do you consider yourself politically...Conservative 9%Liberal 44%Moderate 43% -Apolitical 5% Of the conservatives who answered the poll, almost all of themwere involved in a political organization/ whereas liberals andapolitical persons tended to not be involved in political organiza¬tions. Moderates, for the most part were exactly that, they werein between the liberals and the conservatives in terms of in¬volvement with political organizations.This poll was taken on October 10th in front of Cobb Hall, andthere were ninety-three respondants to this part of the questionaire.While not statistically sound or even necessarily scientific, the Chicago Maroon Poll can serve as somesort of indication of prevailing student opinion on campus.8 The Chicago Maroon Tuesday, October 29, 1985Life in the Limelightcontinued from page sevenProfile: CheerleadingThe University of Chicago’s first coed-cheerleading squad in modern history isgenerating much-needed excitement atfootball games on and off-campus. At first,captain Diane Chung’s idea for integratingmen into the squad was greeted with skepti¬cism, but so far the results have been grati¬fying.Long time observer of the U of C sportsscene and History PhD grad Ray Gadkecommented that "The Loud Proud CrowdPleasers add a lot of the total football expe¬rience here.” and ‘‘if there was a coedcheerleading squad when I was in college,nobody would've gone out for football.”Another laudatory comment came fromthe Knox Athletic Director, who claimedthat “I’ve never seen a coed squad performthat well together — they should cheer pro¬fessionally.”But what the Knox Athletic Directorhasn’t seen is the many spills and tumblesthe members take in preparation for thegame during practice. Expert unintentionaltumbler Faye-Marie Morgan serves as per¬fect example of the kind of abuse the cheer¬leaders must take. For instance, after thefourteenth fall one afternoon, fellow cheer¬leader Raj Nanda quipped, “what do you doFaye, grease your socks before practice?”But whether you’ve seen the cheerleadersin practice or not, it is worth your while tosee them at a Maroon football game. Oncethere, you can answer the questions: “Whatwould Robert Maynard Hutchins think?”and “Is watching the cheerleaders more en¬tertaining that watching the Maroons playfdGtball?” are the candles on the tables. There is notvi much in the way of social atmosphere,5 which makes it a great place to go with thatsomeone special.In keeping with Limelight’s predecessor,there is a place of “worship” for those whoso wish. In the basement is a wall of babyMarshalls (amplifier and speaker cabinets)and a rock with a pink and yellow guitar au¬tographed by Steve Stephans, guitarist forBilly Idol. It must be seen to be believed.Also down here are a greaty many busts ofthe Porcelain God.Any place can have a fancy interior, andLimelight does indeed have this. But whatmakes a club exciting is the people. Boy,does Limelight have people! They come inA new view for American Bandstand. all shapes and sizes, looks and styles. It’s alot of fun just watching so many differentkinds of people who normally are ratherhostile toward one another getting togetherand having a real good time. And goodtimes are in great abundance at Limelight.Each night has something different to offer.Monday through Thursdays are “ThemeNights.” One band is highlighted that eve¬ning. One night it might be Laurie Ander¬son, the next night might be Squeeze. Younever know quite what to expect, exceptthat it will be a lot of fun.The weekends are something special atLimelight. Friday and Saturay nights are“Jam Nights.” One of Limelight’s four DJ’scranks it up and makes sure everyone isdancing and having a good time.But what makes Limelight truly unique?“What makes Limelight unique is ourstaff.” And what a staff! The service staff isextraordinary. There are many waiters andwaitresses roaming throughout the clubmaking sure everyone is fresh; the bar staffmakes a surprisingly good Screwdriver.The door staff is like no other I have everencountered. There are no Monsters of theMidway here, just very nice people random¬ly checking identification and controllingthe flow of traffic into the club. This part ofthe staff has a rather unique method of let¬ting people in on the usually packed week¬end evenings. They go along the lengthylines and pick out people at will. There’s re¬ally no rhyme or reason to it. If they like theway you look, you get in right then; so nomatter when you come you’ve got somechance of getting in soon.Limelight has some “people” on theirstaff that are truly different. In many glass“cages” throughout the club are live “man¬nequins.” As with the people that come toLimelight, the mannequins come in allshapes and sizes. The ones I saw were quitedifferent. In one cage was a very pretty ladyin a rather revealing dress sitting on sandwith an Egyptian-like background. What sether apart from the other scantily clad p>x>;gc. -j* _eoewomen in Limelight, besides the glass, wasthe tarantula crawling up her thigh and thesnake slithering around her arm. In thecage next to her were Louis XVI and hislovely wife Marie Antoinette with their goodfriend La Guillotine. Louis sat rather pas¬sively reading Turgot while Marie did somevery interesting things with a knife. In othercages are women dressed in feathers;women wearing rather small sequineddresses and women sporting Telly Savalashairdos. I wonder who has more fun, thosedoing the watching or those beingwatched?This week Limelight’s cages will be de¬signed with a Halloween theme, and the restof the staff are getting in on the act too. Ifyou really want to see the place, this weekwould be a great time to do so. It promisesto be a good time for all.Limelight is located at 632 N. Dearborn onthe corner of Dearborn and Ontario. Week¬day cover is $5.00. Weekend cover is $7.00.Both are well worth it. Drinks are $3.00 andbeer is $2.75, so bring lots of cash. Limelightis open Sunday through Friday from 9 p.m.’til 4 a.m. and until 5 a.m. on Saturdays. Formore information, call 337-2985 Check it out.. . it’s worth it.READING FROM THE CLOTHES LINESCHOOL OF FICTION EVERY SUNDAY 3:30 - 5 P.M.ALSOTHE AVANT GARFIELD THEATER GROUPPERFORMING EVERY THURSDAY 7-10 P.M.BOTH AT JIMMY’S WOODLAWN TAP1172 E. 55th ST.The Center for Middle Eastern StudiesandThe Department of Near Eastern Languagesand Civilizationspresenta lecture byProfessor James Bellamy44 (The University of Michigan)entitledARABIC ELEGIESThursday, October 31,4:00 pmPick 218 n Immerse YourselfSpend a semester or a yearin Latin America.• Become fluent in Spanish.• Participate in University courses, internships, orindependent research.• Learn I^tin American culture and history face-to-face.• Study in Peru ( Lima Cuzco) orColombia (Bogota Medellin).• Receive full Academic credit from theUniversity of Miami.• Use your existing Financial Aid■UNIVERSITYOF Applications and information from:North. South AcademicExchange ProgramUniversity of MiamiPO Box 2-18123Coral Gables. Florida 3312-1A GLOBAL UNIVERSITY ( 305 ) 284 4303HtfM Foftuiftflewisk lUaweti (K ScienceMinium of Atexondniu (tot Cetdwuj)Sanak of Wwijbwig (l5Hc Cetdwuj)CtHtmj Hoeik&i. JCbc Meihwi and‘RooaQUtd Fuwk&H (20ffc Cetdwuj)Dt Su&ok U. MtesckcfChemtil Science Cmpuim Seaxch Sentice,Cketwhy Lihiatg of UaumUg of Chicago.Vote: Ftiday, Hoventbei ITune: 8.-30 p.m.5717 S. UJimmIEwuk Ave. • 752-H27The Chicago Maroon—Tuesday, October 29, 1985—9WEEKLY CALENDARLecturesOctober 29:Workshops on job search tech¬niques, strategies, and otherhelpful hints for part-time em¬ployment will be offered by theCareer and Placement Servicesthrough November 21.October 30:Douglas Hanahan, Cold SpringHarbour Laboratory, will speakon “Targeted Oncogenesis inPancreatic Beta Cells of Trans¬genic Mice,” at 4 pm in CLSC 101.Rrefreshments at 3:45 in CLSC510.Three judges and a CookCounty Medical Examiner willconduct a mock hearing based ona recent actual case at 4:05 pm inroom 102-102 of the Law School ofthe ITT Chicago-Kent College, 77S. Wacker Dr.The first of two classes on Jew¬ish Humor, presented by theHyde Park JCC. The class will beat 1100 E. Hyde Park Blvd. at 7:30pm. The second class will be atthe same time and location on No¬vember 6. Cost is: Members, $12;non-members, $20; and seniorsand students, $15.Reverend Arie Brouwer willpresent an address on “ChristianPolitical Vocation in America,”as part of the inaugural celebra¬tion of David Ramage, Jr. as theeighth president of the McCor*mick Theological Seminary. Thetalk will be at 10 am in the ChapelAuditorium of the LutheranSchool of Theology. 1100 E. 55thSt.October 31:“Structural Changes in IllinoisEmployment: An Analysis ofGrowth and Decline Industries.”by Wendy Wintermute, economicspecialist, Chicago UrbanLeague, at 7:30 pm in the IdaNoyes Library.October 31:“Who is Under the Mountain?A Midrashic Cover-up,” by Eve¬lyn Cohen. Curator of graphicmaterials, Jewish TheologicalSeminary of America, at 4:30 pmin Cobb 304. November 1 :“Jewish Women in Science:Miriam of Alexandria (1st centu¬ry); Sarah of Wurzburg (15thcentury); Emmy Noether, LiseMeitner, and Rosalind Franklin(20th century),” by Dr. Susan V.Meschel, at 8:30 pm.MusicOctober 29:The Southwest Symphony Or¬chestra’s Fall concert will fea¬ture the U of C’s Maxim Chasan-ov as the trumpet soloist,performing the Hummel Trum¬pet Concerto. Alfred Aulwurmconducts the concert at MotherMcCauley High School, 3737 W.97th St. at 8 pm. Tickets are $6 foradults and $4 for children.October 30:The UIC Writer’s Committeepresents Diane Wakoski, poet, at7 pm as part of its Autumn Liter¬ary Festival. The event will takeplace at the Chicago CircleCenter, 750 Halsted. Tickets are$3 and there is a free reception.Fifth Annual Midwest SmallPress and Literary MagazineFair from 10 am until 4 pm. Alsothe 31st.October 31:Andrew Calhoun, singer,/songwriter, will be presented aspart of the UIC Committee’s Fes¬tival at 2 pm. Admission is free.Chicago Symphony OrchestraSubscription Concerts presentsselections by Beethoven andBruckner with Kyung W’ha Chungon the violin and Klaus Tenn-stedt, conducting. Concert willtake place at 8 pm. Also on No¬vember 1 and 2.November 1:The Women’s Association ofthe Chicago Symphony Orchestrawill offer an all-day seminar onthe “Other Tchaikovsky,” refer¬ring to his lesser known works.The presentation begins with cof¬fee at 9:30 am in the lobby of Or¬chestra Hall and lasts until about2:30 pm. Cost is $30. Seniors andstudents are eligible for specialadmission prices. For more infor¬mation. call 435-8185. Four dynamic new dancepieces will be presented by thetroupe “Rosalind Newman andDancers” at the Dance Center ofColumbia College, 4730 N. Sheri¬dan Rd.Performance (also November2) is at 8 pm. Tickets are $11 and$8 for students and Seniors.November 3:The Merrill Lynch Great Per¬former Series presents NathalBLOOM COUNTY Milsteien on the violin at 3 pm inOrchestra Hall.Five Members of the ChicagoSymphony and a guest pianist,Andrea Swan join as Philharmon¬ic Chicago to present music byBeethoven, Poulenc and Mozart.Concert is at 7 pm in the Orches¬tra Hall Ballroom.MiscellaneousThe Columbia College Art Gal¬ lery’s show “Steven Bigler, Re¬cent works,” will run until No¬vember 8 at 72 E. 11th St.Admission is Free.Films/PlaysOrtnher *“South Pacific: End of Eden?”at the Field Museum of NaturalHistory. The Film is free, lasts 60minutes and will be shown from1:30 until closing.by Berke BreathedDIPYOUHSVEWORPER- THAT EXTRA MARTINI,STEVEN 7 INHYPO YOULIVE YOUR UFE Pi SUCHSINFUL excess ?\ OH, pour I KNOW'CAUSE TTY STRAIGHT IDI'M GOING HELL / RIGHTTO HELL DOWN TO SWAN.'mm, ..itau. makesMA. ME SO UPSET-. THEN NOT ANOTHERWORD-.. 1 PROMISE.LET’S HAVE A AWRIGHT.PRINK TV MY... BOTTOMSunresolved up...well.. just whae15 MISTER MARKING5MARTY -PANTS THE PRECISESCIENTIST SPOT WHEREP0ING NOW 7 HALLEY'S COMET| WILL HIT. OH MAKE ME LAUGH 'THIS COUNTRY WOULD DOWELL TO STOP SWALLOWINGEVERYTHING YOU5ECULARIST 5NAKE-0ILSALESMEN P/SH OUT ' furthermore,I...iUH.. *INFALLIBLE EXECUTIVE TYPESEEKS PERKY BABE WHOS INTOCLEANING FLOORS, DUSTING,CHILDREARING. COOKING, PER¬PETUAL CHEERFULNESS ANDAPPRECIATING JUST WHO THE HECKWEARS THE PANTS INi ? THE FAMILY."V FINE.THAT'LL BE 1 GOTST 17.50. FOURBUCKS.j ! ' NO PROBLEMWE'LL JUST SQUEEZEIT HERE AND THERE...AH. HOW'S THIS.7BAIN & COMPANYManagement Consultantscordially invitesTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO CLASS OF 1986to apresentationonAssociate Consultant Career OpportunitiesinCorporate Strategy ConsultingMonday, November 4,19857:00 - 8:00 PM North LoungeUN10—The Chicago Maroon—Tuesday, October 29, 1985THINK ABOUTGRADUATESCHOOL!Come and meet representatives from accredited graduateschools throughout the United States at the GRE/CGSForum on Graduate Education in your areaCHICAGOSaturday, November 2,1985Palmer House & TowersState and Monroe Streets9:00 am ■ 4:00 pmWORKSHOPS9:00 am-10:00 am PRE-FORUM Workshop on Admissions andFinancial Aid11:00 am -12:00 pm Graduate Study in Computer Science, Engi¬neering, and Mathematics, and —Graduate Study in Biological, Health andPhysical Sciences12:30 pm - 1:30 pm GRE General Test and Subject TestPreparation2:30 pm- 3:30 pm Graduate Study in Economics, Psychology,and other Social Sciences, and —Graduate Study in Education andHumanitiesREGISTRATION begins at 8 30 am. FEE S3 payable at the doorGRADUATE SCHOOL EXHIBITS WILL BE OPEN FROM 10:00 am - 4:00 pm.Jolhtly sponsored by the Graduate Record Examinations Board andthe Council of Graduate Schools in the United StatesPREPARE FOR THE LSATwith high quality, low cost, materials.Order The LSAT Exposed: Thcka From 12 Teals Today I“Discloses test taking strategies for which students previouslyhad to pay big money, and goes the coaching schools one bet¬ter by revealing new strategies known only to the testmakersthemselves. ’ - Ralph NaderSend $12 to: TESTING FOR THE PUBLIC(1 st Class Mail) 1308 PeraltaBerkeley, CA 94702CHOPPED LIVERSO GOOD,PEOPLE HATE IT.Unfortunately for Mrs. Bernice Goldberg, FeastsChopped Chicken Liver tastes every bit as smoothand creamy and luscious as hers. All we can say is,“Sorry, Bernice’.’Try our Chopped Liver while it’s on sale this week.Or our other Feasts favorites.Mr. G’s 53rd & Kimbark 3.5 " SONY DISKS$22.95PER BOXGenuine Sony disks for the Macintoshat an unbelievable price. There isno maximum order.No dealer purchases, no charges, andno phone orders.Cybersystems, Inc.Developers and marketers ofcomputer hardware and software.5501 SOUTH EVERETTCHICAGO, IL 60615667-4000Hours:1:00 - 6:00 p.m. Monday Friday10:00 - 5:00 p.m. SaturdaysShare yourDONATEBLOODU&DUNKCall for an appointment962-6247Studios, 1,2, & 3 BedroomApartments AvailableSome Nice Lake ViewsGood LocationHeat IncludedParking AvailableCALLHERBERT REALTY684-23335% Student Discounts9:60 A.M.-4-.30 P.M.Monday thru Friday9:00 A.M.-2 P.M.SaturdayREMEMBER ITS BETTER l*^*f*Vt IT AND NOT NEED ITTHAN TO NEED lT*AN»NOT HAVE IT *Ace FireSALE7325 S COTTAGE GROVCHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60619 isher Co.FRED BATTLE(312) 8740022-We sell & service fire ex-tinguishers-We sell smoke alarms-We sell safety equipmentAnti-violence Volunteers: CenterFor Non-Violence Education seekingfull-time staff. Lodging, $ 150/month,health coverage. Public interestgroup developing courses on non¬violence and operating NationalCoalition on Television Violence na¬tional headquarters. In Champaignnext to University of Illinois.Research, writing, office work,monitoring entertainment. One yearcommitment. Call 217-384-1920. tn».cSALE DATESOCT. 30th - Nov. 2nd—GROCERY—CHEERI0S19915 oi. IPAW PAWAPPLE CIDER06-019gal. 229CELESTIALSEASONINGSTEASCRANBERRY COVESIEEPYTIMEMANDRIN ORANGE OR SPICES13924 ct. IWHOLE BEANCOFFEElb. 38916 oz. RICELANDEXTRA LONGGRAIN RICE2/89*EAGLE BRANDCONDENSEDMILK12914 oz. IKRAFTSTRAWBERRY JAMi”32 oz.MAZOLAoil07948 oz.—DAIRYPARKAY49<16 oz.KRAFT "IWS."AMERICANSINGLES13912 oz. IFRENCHBRIE259HFROZiN-TROPICANAO.J.12 oz. 99*-ME.«fS-GOV'T. INSP. SADDLECHICKEN LEGSlb. 49*USDA CHOICECUBE STEAK049-DELI-FRESHCHOPPED LIVERib. 299FINER FOODSSERVING53-e PRAIRIE SHORTSKiMBaRk plaza ;q;’ vipno**rifit-'t1 ' Oi i’t L Ew* Gn.t-The Chicago Maroon—Tuesday, October 29, 1985—11—-Debate transcriptcontinued from page fivehave begun to identify at least the US ad¬ministration very closely with the South African government and apartheid, althoughthey do recognize the difference betweenthe American people and the American gov¬ernment. But, I think there is a much moreserious question, and that is. what will thepeople of Chicago think of you if you cancontinue to endorse a policy that supportsapartheid in South Africa. So that I wouldsay that there are two parts of that questionthat you need to think about very seriously.And, finally, you asked about the role of theUniversity. I think one thing has to be clear.Both sides in South Africa are watchingwhat you do very closely. Divestment hashad a large impact. It’s a huge issue, that isreally thought of as very, very important interms of alignment of forces: who supportsus in the struggle for freedom, who does not.It's a yardstick for which side you are on. Sowhatever you do you will be taking a politi¬cal decision, making a political act. Youcan’t escape it. Surely it is time then to actin support of people struggling to be free.They have asked for your help, and I thinkit’s time to give it to them now. Thankyou.PRESIDENT GRAYThe title of this session is “The Role of theUniversity in Divestment.’’ Our argumentis, I think, not in any sense over the evils ofthe regime in South Africa, the system ofapartheid in South Africa. Our argumentmay be, and here different people have dif¬ferent points of view about what is the bestthing to be done, but our central argument,to start with, has to do with the role of theUniversity; and, therefore, I want to startwith the second of the three questions thatwe were posed: “What should be the role ofthe University in the worldwide fightagainst such oppressive regimes as that ofapartheid in South Africa?”Now there’s no question that no one can beneutral on the issue of apartheid. There isno question that the central values of eachof us as individuals, I should think, and cer¬tainly of this University as an institution areviolated in every sense by that system, thatthe University’s values as an institution,which have to do with human dignity and in¬dividual rights, must mean that the Univer¬sity should indeed speak with that voice.The question is whether it is appropriate forthe University at the same time to take po¬litical action and to endorse a particularstrategy or set of strategies in support ofthat. The other values which the Universityis also concerned about, and which must beat the heart of an institution of this kind,have to do obviously with the values of aca¬demic freedom, with the protection,strengthening, and preservation of a forumfor debate and for dissent; and it is in thenature of a university that as a collective in¬stitution it should not presume to speak onbehalf of the individuals within it, who maytake very different points of view and whoare also not only people who will take dif¬ferent points of view, but people who haveother forums, not simply for expressing, butfor acting on those points of view. The mis¬sion of the University requires the impera¬tive of that kind of set of conditions, that en¬vironment, that academic freedom. Themission of the University, namely those thathave to do with education, with inquiry,with discovery, with the stimulation of thiskind of environment, is a mission that itadopts, not for its own private purposes, butit is a mission that it is hoped is for the pub¬lic good as well. That there be institutions ofthis kind, that there be environments of thiskind, that there be institutions with the spe¬cial mission of education and of debate is12—The Chicago Maroon—Tuesday, October important to the public world as well, and itis important not only on a national but on aninternational or global basis. That missionrequires also the autonomy of the institutionto the greatest possible degree, autonomyfrom succumbing to external pressures andexternal definitions of orthodoxy or of worthwhich might intervene in the pursuit of thatmission or in the attempt at limiting that ac¬ademic freedom. I think we’re all aware ofthe countless times in which political andother institutions have tried to speak to suchissues about the University and tried tokeep corporations, for example, from sup¬porting universities, have maintained thatindividuals at universities have not promot¬ed. advocated the positions that they thinkare those that ought to be taken. Finally, un¬iversities come under the responsibilities ofa group of trustees who are entrusted withthe management of the resources that havebeen given and that are meant to be invest¬ed in pursuit of that mission and, at thesame time, in pursuit of that mission with asensitivity to and in the context of the ex¬pression of those values. The trustees areentrusted with the responsibility, then, ofusing the resources, not in ways that theymay find, perhaps as individuals, most at¬tractive, but in ways that speak to the re¬sponsibility that they have for the long-termhelp and preservation of the resources ofthe institution, so that it can do what it hasbeen set up to do. and that too is a moralobligation, not only a legal obligation.I would submit then, in the question“What is the appropriate role of the Univer¬sity?”, that the appropriate role of a univer¬sity must be that of maintaining the valuesand the purpose for which it exists, and, atthe same time, of maintaining those valuesand that purpose in a way that protects theacademic freedom of the members of the in¬stitution, that protects the autonomy of theinstitution, and that pursues the responsibi¬lities which are for the public good withwhich it has been endowed. And that giventhat fact, the way in which an institution inthis instance may behave is somewhat dis¬tinct from the way that each of us as individ¬uals might choose to act, might choose tobehave in a matter about which we feel verydeeply indeed. I do not believe that the Uni¬versity should be the surrogate for our tak¬ing action as individuals in the publicforum. I do not believe that the Universityas an institution should be our substitute forbeing out in the public forum, attempting toinfluence public policy, attempting to influ¬ence legislation, attempting to do what wecan in the light of our convictions to make adifference. I do not believe that the Univer¬sity can be called on to do that for us, and Ido not believe that if we call upon the Uni¬versity to do that for us, that we are main¬taining the integrity of that kind of institu¬tion. As a corporate entity, I believe that itis the role of the University to speak and actdirectly to those matters that affect its cen¬tral mission, and that includes issues of aca¬demic freedom, issues that have to do withthe pursuit of knowledge, issues that have todo with access to education, and otherissues of that kind. And the sense in which,beyond affirming your values and our con¬science as an institution on the issue ofapartheid, I think it is appropriate for theUniversity to proceed, to build its role onthat which it is endowed to do, that which itis mandated to do, and that which it knowshow to do best, and that has to do with find¬ing ways in the educational world togetherwith others, on its own, and a whole varietyof ways, to attempt to engage with groups inSouth Africa, with South African universi¬ties, with individuals in every way possibleto help in the educational process, whichwill be another of the important conditionsfor a viable and healthy majority societyand democratic society in South Africa. Ibelieve that part of that role is the role ofhelping to provide better information. Weknow too little, us American citizens surelyknow too little about South Africa. Weshould do more; this University, I think,should do more in the way of undertakingthe pursuit of knowledge, in the way of un¬dertaking to inform and disseminate knowl¬edge that has to do with this. But quitebeyond that, I think that there are ways, as Isaid, in which we should be engaging withothers in the South African community andwith universities in order to see what we cando, understanding that what any one institu¬tion can do is probably limited, understand¬ing that to do as much as we can is what weneed to be looking for. A number of us in theuniversity and foundation world met lastweek with the Vice Chancellor of Cape TownUniversity, as well as the Vice ChancellorDesignate of the University of the WesternCape, in order to begin a process of seeingwhether there are programs, whether thereare activities, whether there are ways inwhich we can jointly engage in a programthat will build on what, as universities, weknow how to do, or can do best and can con¬tribute out of our mission in order to find outwhat the foundations involved might be ableto do in the way of resources in order to helpmake that possible. I come then to the issue of divestment andwhy it is that this University has not pur¬sued and does not have a policy of pursuingtotal divestment. This University believesthat it should be a responsible investor. Itbelieves that what can be judged, at least tosome extent, is the conduct of companies asthey may do business in South Africa. We’retalking about a group of multinational com¬panies, we’re not talking about South Afri¬can companies, we're not talking aboutcompanies that may do a large part of theirbusiness in South Africa. We’re not investedin those. But we’re talking about compa¬nies, which, however small a portion—andusually it’s around 1% of their business is inSouth Africa—are nonetheless a notablepresence in South Africa in that sense Nowour trustees have said that to act respons¬ibly, and I apologize for lawyers’ languagebut, let me—my lawyer friends, I think,would not recognize that as sufficient law¬yers’ language—let me say that we have notindeed required, in our own approach to thisissue, that companies necessarily be signa¬tories. We think that the nature of their con¬duct is more important than whether exter¬nally they have signed or not signed aparticular statement. We think that the Sul¬livan principles represent a set of guidelineswhich ought to be valid 4n any case. Andthere are companies which have not signedthe Sullivan principles to this point whichhave had their independent accountants dothe evaluation (which in the case of the sig¬natories Arthur D. Little has performed);so that there are ways to evaluate the con¬duct and effort of individual corporations.Our trustees have felt that to remain share¬holders in corporations, voting proxies on acase by case basis in order to influence theconduct of companies, is a more responsibleact on their part than automatically to with¬draw. To engage as shareholders in dia¬logue with those companies in trying tohave some influence on the conduct of suchcompanies and work over a longer period oftime toward that is a beneficial and respon¬sible thing to do. The banks who refused toextend credit this summer in South Africawould not have been able to refuse thatcredit, I think, had they—quite apart fromthe overriding, financial reasons that moti¬vated them—had they not felt the pressurealso from their own shareholders, share¬holders, who had they sold out, might havegiven way to others who were not so eagerfor the banks to take such action. That atany rate is a possible effect, that there is aleverage in remaining as a shareholder inurging certain kinds of conduct and in mak¬ing it possible to behave as a responsibleshareholder. So, on the one hand, the trust¬ees’ policy has been to vote proxies on acase by case basis, trying to look at all thefactors involved and, secondly, to look atthe issue of selective, as opposed to total di¬vestment, to develop a process and a set ofcriteria by which there may be occasionswhere one would say, “A company is notgoing to alter its conduct, a company is notbehaving as it ought to behave; it is a com¬pany with which an institution ought not tobe associated.”Now there are in fact great arguments. Idon’t know the answers; I’m glad that somepeople are so clear about them because Iwish I could be. There is a good deal of dis¬agreement as to what the actual economicconsequences of divestment would be. Itwould make a difference, and yet it’s almostimpossible to quantify, in the actual endow¬ment, long term endowment stability of aninstitution like this. There are costs relatedto total divestment, because it is for the longterm that endowments are invested. Theyare very large; they require diversifica¬tion; they require as low a level of risk aspossible. And over the long term, it is verydifficult to see that there would not either beimmediate costs—those cah be better quan¬tified—or long term risks, which it wouldbe imprudent or unwide to undertake. Therewould be costs, I believe, to the autonomy,the essential autonomy of the institution.The same kind of economic pressure thatwe might try or claim to use against otherscould be, I think, more easily and withgreater justification applied to us. Andthere could be consequences, other kinds ofcosts, to the kind of internal environment ofappropriate dissent which we aim to fos¬ter.But this brings us, really, to the first ques¬tion with which we are posed, and that was:“Is divestment an effective instrumentagainst apartheid?” I don’t know that it is.//// I’ve just been told that it is, and once again Iwish that I could be so certain. I do not knowthat our divesting ourselves of stock in acompany would lead such a company towithdraw from business in South Africa, ifthat were our intention in divesting. I see noevidence that that is so. I see no way inwhich the government of South Africawould necessarily be swayed or would col¬lapse as a consequence of our divesting our¬selves of stock in such a company. I realizethat there are those who argue with deepconviction that the symbolic action itselfwould have an effect that reverberates. Butreverberations, like the ripples after youcast the stone in the sea, tend not to last forvery long, and then you’ve lost your lever¬age, then you’ve lost your opportunity, Ithink, to influence the conduct or to influ¬ence the actual outcome in a company. Sayyou’ve decided that a company ought towithdraw; you would no longer internallybe able to make that point.I think that there is also a desire to divesttotally on the grounds that then the moraltaint, or the taint of immorality associatedwith any implication in companies that dobusiness in South Africa and by extension,therefore, are implicated in the system,would be gone. That seems to me no solutionat all. That seems to me to be neither of con¬structive aid to others nor does it put us, Ithink, in a position in which we can arguehow moral we are. We then still have to con¬tend with the issue of what about govern¬ment securities, what about treasury bills,what about companies that may not have apresence in South Africa but that trade withSouth Africa, or whose products are sold atsecond-hand in South Africa? The seamlessweb can be seamless indeed, and it becomesan almost impossibly complicated question.I do not know that companies should neces¬sarily withdraw. That does not seem to me agiven at this time. It does not seem to me agiven that US corporations, for whateverreasons, may not be trying hard to play amore constructive role and a more enlight¬ened role, and a more active role in the pub¬lic forum in South Africa, as well, than wasonce the case. It’s not clear to me that theirpresence, within the bounds of that kind ofconduct and that kind of effort, may not bebeneficial rather than detrimental. It is notclear to me that the kinds of guidelines sug¬gested by the Sullivan principles, or theirequivalent, may not have helped particularpeople, and a largish group of people, eventhough I have no doubt that the Sullivanprinciples will not destroy apartheid. But, Ido believe that the assertion of immoralityassociated with that attempt to live by suchprinciples and to make some difference inthe lives of people is wrong, and I do believethat the political issues and assumptionsthat surround all this are ones that can bevery much debated and that are not likely tobe agreed upon by the institution as collec¬tivity, even if it were appropriate for our in¬stitution to make its decision on politicalgrounds, or to use its resources in order totake political action.And that leads me finally to the thirdquestion, since I have (only two minutesleft). Is there not still good political andmoral ground for US institutions to adopt apolicy of divestment so as to encouragegood relations with the future majority gov¬ernment of South Africa? I think the issuefor the University is not the question of goodrelations with the majority government, thefuture majority government of South Afri¬ca. I think the issue for the University iswhether we can act as we should, in a waythat can make some little difference, and ifwe can extend our own associations and ourown constructive activity together withothers in South Africa and other educationalinstitutions in South Africa to make that re¬spect, that dimension of what ought to bepresent and strong in a democratic societyboth more viable and more powerful. And Ibelieve, once again, that each of us as citi¬zens should be acting in the public forumand as people convinced that we can do so inorder to be trying to influence the policy ofthe United States toward South Africa. It isa complex issue to balance the kind of mis¬sion, the set of values that we are respons¬ible for attempting to pursue. To balancethe attention that we need to give to thatcentral mission in relation to our responsibi¬lities as shareholders and our consciencesas individuals is not an easy thing, but thatis one of the things that I think and hope theenvironment of the University can help toencourage. Thank you.29, 1985 ‘I do not believe that the University should be the surrogatefor our taking action as individuals in the public forum. I donot believe that the University as an institution should be oursubstitute for being out in the public forum, attempting to in¬fluence legislation, attempting to do what we can in the lightof our convictions to make a difference.” —President GrayMcGovern calls formilitary spending cutsBy Andy ForsaithContributing WriterIn a speech on campus last Tuesday,former US Senator George McGoverncalled for a new approach to foreign and do¬mestic policy by the Democratic Party inorder for it to recapture the White House.The Senator said the Democratic Party’sproblems are not caused by rule changes inthe delegate selection process, or because itis seen as weak on defense or connected tooclosely with the welfare state. Instead, heargued, the cause of recent Democraticlosses is the incompatability of promotingthe “warfare state” with the ideals and phi¬losophies of the Party. “My own theory isthat one major key to Democratic divisionsand defeat is the enervating and divisiveimpact of war and the arms race on theDemocratic Party and the nation.”What he sees as excessive military spend¬ing and intervention abroad does not go wellwith the Democratic principles of idealismand concern for others. The result is a divid¬ed party. In addition, the high inflation andlarge deficits caused by simultaneouslylarge domestic and defense budgets are notpopular with voters.Senator McGovern called for scaling backUS military presence abroad and the can¬cellation of new weapon systems as a way ofsolving four problems facing the nation: ahuge federal deficit caused by high militaryspending, the necessity to maintain domes¬tic programs while reducing the deficit, alarge trade deficit caused by a high dollar,and what he believes is the heavy diversionof scientific and engineering talent fromprivate industry to the Pentagon.“In short, if we want to offer an alterna¬tive progressive agenda to Reaganism, wemust exit the arms race and get into thepeace race.”This does not mean a move toward isola-tionalism, he argued. “We do not measureAmerica’s commitment to internationalismby the number of troops or arms we haveabroad.” He continued, “A wise interna¬tionalism also includes cooperation in meet¬ing such global challenges as environmen¬tal pollution, population growth, and humanhunger.”Senator McGovern outlined several stepsto accomplish this, including a halt to all nu¬clear testing similar to the Soviet moratori¬ um of last August 6, followed by a compre¬hensive Test Ban Treaty, and deep cuts innuclear weapons in return for limiting theStrategic Defense Initiative or “Star Wars”program to only research. The MX missleshould be cancelled also, he said.Noting that 60% of the military budget isspent projecting our power abroad and theprotection of others, McGovern contendedthat large savings could be made with a re¬duction of our overseas commitments. Forexample, he suggested that US forces inEurope be gradually reduced from 300,000to 150,000. A similar reduction can be madein Korea. He said Europe has long since re¬covered from World War II, and canshoulder more of its own defense.Senator McGovern also called for a halt toall US military operations in Central Ameri¬ca. Trade and diplomatic relations shouldbe reopened with Cuba. He said Americanpolicy toward the Middle East should betruly evenhanded and based on United Na¬tions Resolution 242. Finally, the Democrat¬ic Party should support a tax reform billwhich eliminates tax loopholes and simpli¬fies the tax code.According to Senator McGovern, theseproposals would result in a savings of athird of the defense budget, which should beused for both deficit reduction and fundingdomestic programs.In responding to questions from the audi¬ence afterwards, he said divestment fromholdings in South Africa is one tool to bringabout change in the apartheid system, butnot the “key policy.” The presence of Amer¬ican corporations in South Africa, he said,could be used as leverage against the gov¬ernment.When asked whether the reduction of USforces in Europe would be unwise consider¬ing the large Warsaw Pact forces in East¬ern Europe, he responded that the US wouldstill have a sizable force and that the loyaltyof Soviet’s Warsaw Pact allies in a war isnot dependable. Besides, he continued, hecannot believe that the Soviet Union has anyserious designs on Western Europe.Senator McGovern lectured before afriendly and near-capacity audience inBreasted Hall at the Oriential Institute. Hisspeech was the second in a series of lecturesentitled. “America’s Role in the World.”conducted by the John M. Olin Center.I CSA,The College Student Assembly,Would like to thank everyone whohelped make Casino Night a success. Wewould especially like to thank LarryKavanagh, Anne Wells, Sue Wrobel,Doug Hadley, Louisa Williams, andSonia Jacobson for their work inplanning and running this past weekend.We would also like to thank all of ourvolunteers (over 100 of you). And last,but in no way least, all the merchantswho donated prizes that enabled us toraise $ 21OO for Ronald McDonaldHouse.If anyone has any ideas forKuviasungnerk, The Weeklong WinterCarnival, please contact us in ourmailfolder in The College Mailroom.Thanx Again,Arthur(this space contributed by The Maroon)PEACE CORPSandTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGOpresent"THE U.S. STAKE INWORLD DEVELOPMENT"a day-long symposium oninternational developmentNOVEMBER 4,1985opportunities to do constructivework in developing countries;alternative paths of development’self-help grass-roots projectswill be discussedas part of the symposium,Joseph Shortformer Executive Director of Oxfam Americawill give a public lecture"U.S. voluntary Assistanceto the Third World"3-.30 p.m. Social Science 122for the day—lunch included—$20Joseph Short’s lecture open to the publicfor information or to register, callCenter for International StudiesPick Hall 104962 7721The Chicago Maroon—Tuesday. October 29, 1985—13Maroons celebrate Homecoming victoryBy Frank MichaelsStaff WriterSaturday fall weather was indeed the per¬fect background for a day of record-settingand celebrations at Stagg Field.On a Homecoming Day which featuredthe dedication of the Stagg Field track toTed Haydon, and an appearance by formerMaroon runningback Jay Berwanger, thewinner of the first Heisman Trophy, theUniversity of Chicago football team ensuredcomplete success for the afternoon with a21-13 victory over Ripon, before 2150 people,the largest Stagg Field crowd of the sea¬son.The triumph boosts Chicago’s record to4-4 on the season, and represents their mostwins in a season since the 1970’s. TheMaroons took a commanding 21-7 halftimeadvantage, thanks to two goal line stands, a7-for-9 passing performance from freshmanquarterback Scott Gross, and the rushing ofBruce Montella and Tony Lee.Montella started the afternoon by break¬ing the single season school rushing recordon his second carry of the game. Montella.an All-American and Academic All-Ameri¬can candidate, received a game ball fromBerwanger, who was also present to com¬memorate the 50th anniversary of his Heis¬man Trophy season in 1935.Not only did Montella break the old markof 1004 yards, he left it in the dust by gaining191 yards on the day, giving him 1187 for theseason and reestablishing his dominance asone of the top two rushers in NCAA DivisionIII in the nation.The Maroons’ goal line stands answer thequestion many people would have regard¬ing the game's final statistics. After all,Ripon quarterback Paul Brandenburg fin¬ished the day 27-of-57 passing for 403 yards,and Ripon had over 500 yards of total of¬fense. But the Redmen scored only 13points. What happened?Ripon’s initial first-and-goal possession came to an abrupt end when linebackerDave Baker, another Maroon All-Americancandidate, sacked Brandenburg, forcing afumble which Chicago eventually reco¬vered.The Maroons fumbled on the very nextplay, giving Ripon the ball at the Chicago16. Ripon moved quickly to a first-and-goalsituation at the Maroon three, but thenfailed four times to punch the ball across thegoal line, and surrendered possession ondowns.Chicago’s first touchdown came with11:03 remaining in the first quarter, on a 14-yard pass from Gross to Russ Johannesson.Paul Song added the first of his three extrapoints to make the score 7-0.Lee added the next score with one of theMaroons’ most impressive runs from scrim¬mage this season. Breaking at least a half adozen tackles, the Maroon fullbacksmashed his way into the endzone from 28yards out early in the second quarter, togive Chicago a 14-0 lead.The final touchdown came on a 28-yardaround left end by Montella, his ninth touch¬down of the season.Ripon scored on a second quarter touch¬down pass from Brandenburg to JimBrown, and a 32-yard late fourth quarter TDpass from Brandenburg to Steve Feyrer.The Redmen tried an onside kick, but Mon¬tella covered the ball easily and theMaroons took over on what seemed to be thelast possession of the ball game. But on 1st-and-5 from the Redmen 17, Gross tried toreach Eric Smith on a fade pass in the endzone, and Ripon’s Andy Monahan intercept¬ed at the goal line. That left Ripon 99 yardsfrom the end zone with only a minute left inthe game.The last-ditch drive by the Redmen ap¬peared dead a few plays iater when Maroonsafety Ted Voorhees intercepted a Branden¬burg pass and ran out the clock on his re¬turn. Ripon protested, however, that thescoreboard clock had not stopped on the Redmen’s previous play, when Feyrer wasknocked out of bounds. The officials upheldthe protest, nullified Voorhees’ intercep¬tion, and gave the Redmen the ball back attheir own 40 with 22 seconds left on theclockAs many of the fans streamed from thestands with the impression that the gamehad ended, the officials restored order andresumed play. Following another comple¬tion to Feyrer, Brandenburg’s and Ripon’schances evaporated for real when Song in¬tercepted a pass and returned it 25 yards torun out the remaining time.At halftime of the game, Dean of StudentsCharles O’Connell and University PresidentHanna Gray conducted the dedication of theStagg Field track to Edward M. “Ted” Hay¬don, the late professor emeritus of physicaleducation, and a former Olympic coach.Haydon’s son Jim accepted the bronze pla¬ que honoring Haydon. The plaque will hangat the entrance to the field.The football game also highlighted a two-day Homecoming weekend, which featureda fireworks display and bonfire on Fridayevening, the very successful Casino Night inIda Noyes Hall, a pre-game luncheon onSaturday, and the Jimmy Cliff concert,sponsored by MAB, on Saturday night. Thegame also concluded Chicago’s 1985 homefootball schedule, which saw the Maroonsaverage almost 1500 people per game, andsaw the formation of the Maroon pep band,which will hopefully remain together for theupcoming men’s and women’s basketballseasons.The Maroons conclude the 1985 season onthe road against the undefeated St. NorbertGreen Knights, the winners of the MidwestConference North Division.Captain Arzou Ahsan battles Wheaton College in the final field hockey game.HeartbreakingBy Jon HerskovitzStaff WriterSo, it has come to pass. After a frustratingand disappointing season, field hockey hascome to an end. No longer will the time —honored game of field hockey be played as aVarsity sport for women, it will be replacedby soccer next autumn.In a game typical of the season, Chicagofield hockey lost their final game to Whea¬ton College this past Friday by a score of2-0. Chicago controlled the play of the game,they out-shot Wheaton, and yet they stilllost. As Coach Linda Whitehead summed upthe game, “We were always one foot awayand one foot behind.”The game against Wheaton started outslowly. Both teams played tentatively forthe opening minutes, but as play wore on,Chicago took command. The Chicago of¬fense came to life after Pamina Haddocktook a shot that was deflected wide. This ledto two consecutive penalty corners. On thefirst corner, Arzou Ahsan took the initiatingpass from Kerry Begley, and sent a hardshot just wide to the left of the Wheatongoal. On the second corner, it seemed thatChicago had gone ahead 1-0. Ahsan againtook the initiating pass, and she put a hardairborne shot in the Wheaton goal. Howev¬er, the officials ruled that Ahsan had notstopped the ball before she shot, and thegoal was disallowed.Chicago maintained the offensive pres¬sure on Wheaton. Good play by links Had¬dock and Ahsan kept Chicago on the attack.But the difference of a few inches preventedChicago from securing a lead. On two con¬secutive penalty corners, Ahsan shot justleft of the Wheaton goal. A crossing passfrom Haddock was slightly out of reach ofthe Chicago inners.Despite the good play of the Chicago of¬fense, it was Wheaton who opened the scor¬ing in the game. Wheaton’s scoring playstarted when the right wing sent a crossingpass through the Chicago circle. Wheatonleft wing Bristal handled the pass and set-14—The Chicago Marooa—Tuesday, October hockey finishtied the ball. Then she pivoted and shot. Theshot was deflected, and Bristal followed hershot to put Wheaton up 1-0.After the goal by Wheaton, Chicago stillmaintained the offensive pressure. The firsthalf ended as Chicago failed to score onthree consecutive penalty corners. Threeconsecutive corners, three good shots, andthree balls that went just wide of the Whea¬ton goal, and the first half ended withoutChicago scoring.The second half opened with Wheaton onthe attack. The action was more intensethan in the previous half, and the domi¬nance of the Chicago offense was no longerfelt.Wheaton scored their second goal aboutten minutes into the second half. Wheaton’slink Green took the initiating pass off of apenalty corner and put it in for the game’sfinal goal.Chicago rebounded from the Wheatongoal, and began to mount the offensive pres¬sure that dominated the second half, yet theteam just could not score. Coach Whiteheadswitched Caroline Christen to link andmoved Haddock to sweeper to try to varythe Chicago attack and to give the tiredHaddock some rest.As the game ended, Chicago was stillpressing the Wheaton goal, but they wereunable to score. The loss was Chicago’s sec¬ond to Wheaton this season, and it left thefinal record of the field hockey team at3-9.Despite the poor record, Chicago playedbeyond expectations. Coach Whitehead tooka team that had only four returning startersand eight players that have never playedcollegiate field hockey, and turned theminto a competitive team. Five of the starterson this year’s team have never played colle¬giate field hockey. Yet, despite the lack ofdepth of experienced talent, Coach White-head formed a strong squad. Another year,and with one more season, this team wouldhave been one of the better teams around,but there cannot be a rebuilding year in thefinal spawn29, 1965 Men's x-country faces heatBy Scott BernardStaff WriterWhen the heat is on, s is Chicago seniorMike Rabieh.Most runners can’t stand warm weather.They run best on dry, overcast days withtemperatures in the low 50s. Rising temper¬atures spell falling performances for them.But not for Rabieh. When the mercurysoars, so do his fortunes.And the mercury soared Saturday for theUniversity of Chicago Invitational CrossCountry Meet in nearby Washington Park.While other runners broiled in the middaysun, Rabieh sizzled over the four-milecourse, leaving dozens of athletes complain¬ing of heat exhaustion in his wake. Sweatpouring into their eyes, their elevated bodytemperatures reaching critical levels, thewilting cool-weather runners were heard togasp “Why isn’t that Maroon wilting in thestifling heat as we are?” as Rabieh raced bythem. “What’s his secret?” each asked him¬self in his heart of hearts. And it’s nowonder they did, for Rabieh set a personalrecord of 20:35 on a day when the tempera¬ture reached a near-record high of 70 de¬grees. He placed 18th in the 110-man field,the only Maroon to finish in the top 50.“That he broke his personal record by 20seconds on such a suffocatingly hot day isalmost unbelievable,” said teammate PaulUlrich, who finished 51st in 21:48. “Whilethe rest of us were dying in the Mojave Des¬ert-like heat, he was running one of the bestraces of his young life. I don’t know how hedid it. It’s amazing.” As Ulrich spoke, otherMaroons nodded their heads in grave agree¬ment.“I don’t know what they’re talkingabout,” said Rabieh. “It was only 70 de¬grees.”“Just listen to him! Only 70 degrees!” ex¬claimed Chicago senior Gary Levenson,whose 21:55 earned him 52nd place. “Sure,it was 70 degrees out at O’Hare, where offi¬ cial readings are taken, but down in the val¬ley where we ran (Note: Washington Parkis 5 feet below the surrounding neighbor¬hoods - Ed.), it must have been 110 de¬grees!”“Oh, at least,” commented Steve Eick.who placed 59th in 22:11. “I would say it wasmore like 115, judging from the sweat whichwas coursing in rivulets over my body fromthe top of my head to the soles of myfeet.”As his teammates debated over how highthe temperature was, Rabieh slowly walkedaway, shaking his head in bewilderment.After Rick, freshman Armand Musey wasthe next Chicago finisher placing 62nd in22:22. Sean Love and Paul Ellenbogenplaced 66th and 67th in 22:41 and 22:44, re¬spectively, to round out Chicago’s topseven.The Maroons placed fifth in the 11-teamfield, the first time they’ve finished in thetop half of a meet all season. Wheaton wonthe meet with 44 points, just two ahead ofsecond-place North Central, whose top run¬ners dropped out of the race because theywere tuning up for their conference champi¬onship next week. The University of Wiscon-sin-Parkside was third with 62 points, andIllinois Benedictine finished fourth with 85.After Chicago, which scored 168 points, theteams finished as follows: 6. College of Du-Page, 173; 7. Concordia, 201; 8. Aurora, 228;9. Chicago State, 244; 10. UIC, no score re¬ported; and 11. Carthage, no score report¬ed.Chicago Coach Mike Karluk thought Sat¬urday’s meet showed promise for hisMaroons. “I was very pleased with Ra-bieh’s and Levenson’s races,” he said.“Today was the closest Gary has been toUlrich all year. He’s looking pretty good.Actually, most of my boys are lookingpretty good. I think they’ll peak at confer¬ence next Saturday.”Saturday the Maroons travel to Cornellfor the conference championship.Women's x-country is ready!Women’s cross-country is off and runningin its third season at the University of Chi¬cago. This year’s team is the largest in itsbrief history. Returning from last year’ssquad are Karin Kenny, Maria Ponder, LisaMiotto, and Lisa Petterson. Rejoining theMaroons after a year off is Rachel Vinkey(MVP in ’83). There are many new runnerson this year’s squad.This past weekend, the Maroons ran intheir own Ted Haydon Invitational at Wash¬ington Park. The conditions were sunny,breezy, and pleasant. There were eight col¬leges present, including two of which arenoted cross-country powerhouses: Wheatonand Augustana. Wheaton brought three fullsquads while Augustana brought two. Therewere sixty-two runners in all. Vinkey led theMaroon*! planing 12th in a time of 19:50 ovcr the three mile course. Lishick ran next asshe placed 19th with a time of 20:20. She wasfollowed by Kenny who ran an excellent,race and placed 21st in 20:33. Petterson andMiotto rounded out the scoring as Pettersonfinished 23rd in 20:57 and Miotto, 28th in21:11.Head coach Wendy Sood emphasized thatthe entire team (not just the top five) ranvery well. Each team member improvedtheir 3 mile time from last week’s perfor¬mance. She stated with confidence that theMaroons are now ready for the ConferenceChampionships.The MACW Conference Championshipsare this weekend, November 2, in Cornell,Iowa. They will be followed by the NCAAMidwest Regionals held on November 16.Good luck to Coach Sood anu her team.F!CLASSIFIEDSCLASSIFIEDADVERTISINGClassified advertising in the Chicago Maroon is$2 for the first line and $1 for each additionalline. Lines are 45 characters long INCLUDINGspaces and punctuation. Special headings are20 character lines at $3 per line. Ads are not ac¬cepted over the phone, and they must be paidin advance. Submit all ads in person or by mailto The Chicago Maroon, 1212 E. 59th St.,Chicago IL 60637 ATTN Classified Ads. Our office is in Ida Noyes Rm. 304. Deadlines: Tuesday & Friday at 5:00 p.m., one week prior topublication. Absolutely no exceptions will bemade! In case of errors for which the Maroonis responsible, adjustments will be made orcorrections run only if the business office isnotified WITHIN ONE CALENDAR WEEK ofthe original publication. The Maroon is notliable for any errors.SPACEAPARTMENTS AVAILABLEStudios, one, two & 3 bedrms some lake viewsnear 1C, CTA & U of C shuttle, laundry,facilities, parking available, heat & water in¬cluded. 5% discounts for students. HerbertRealty 684-23339-4:30 Mon. Fri. 9-2 on Sat.GOVERNMENT HOMES from $1 (U repair).Also delinquent tax property. Call 805-687 6000Ext. GH-4534 for information.Female roommate wanted to share double.Live cheap and close to campus at DU. 5714Wooodlawn. Call Betsy 753-3444.ROOMMATE WANTED to share Huge 2brmapt 52nd & Dorchester $215. 643-8195.Beautiful Lakeview StudioNewly carpeted, highly secure, reasonable $.Call 324-4546 evenings or weekends.Large lbr Regents Park 20th fl Lake viewdishwasher, pool, health club, market, b busCTA route. $550/mo incl/heat. 684-5421 anytime.Two Bedrm Two Bath Exc. Sec. Immed. Oce.New Carp. Ref. Req. 864 8082 or 440 4360.SPACE WANTEDGrad seeks apt or room near 59th. Will acceptvariety of arrangements, after 6pm. 396-7357.Responsible adult would like to do long term(min. 4-6 mo) Housesitting. 955-7998 eves.PEOPLE WANTEDGOVERNMENT JOBS S16,040-S59,230/ yr.Now Hiring. Call 805-687 6000 Ext. R 4534 forcurrent federal list.ACTIVIST STUDENTS and others. Earn $165$300/wk helping low income citizens fight forjobs, housing and justice. Full/part time. CallACORN 9 noon 939-7492.Federal, State and Civil Service jobs nowavailable in your area. For info, call (602) 837-3401 Dept. 826.Secretary with good word processing skillsneeded by research professor. Please send vitato ISBP, 5741 Drexel, Chicago, 60637.SCIENTIFIC WRITER to assist in the writingand editing of scientific literature. Part-time,self-starter, good writing skills, ability to workindependently/2-6690.Research tech in Dept, of Molecular geneticsand Cell Biology. Work involves mammalianmolecular genetics 8, cytogenetics. Bach'sdegree in Biol. Science or Chem. req'd shouldhave some exp. working in a lab (undergradresearch, etc.) Exp. working with DNAhelpful, but not necessary. 40 hrs./wk/ ContactDr. Rosann Farber, 962-1632. The University ofChicago is an Equal Opportunity Employer.OflNfSi-AMIRtCAN RESTAURANTSpecializing in Cantoneseand American dishesOpen Doily 11 A 8 30 P.M.Closed MondayHUE.ASH MU4-1062AdministrativeAide• CAN YOU ASSUME responsibilityfor assisting in the coordination ofnur transportation program?• .RE YOU ABLE to do extensiverecord keeping in a reliable manner?• DO YOU RELATE WELL to senioradults?• ARE YOU DEPENDABLE, well-orqanized, versatile, able to type 50wpm?• WANT TO WORK IN Hyde Park?IF ALL THIS evokes a positive response within you,send a resume or letter o( application to Ron Ramer,HYDE PARK JCC, 1100 E Hyde Park Btvd . Chicago"dn profit/* o «. Looking for responsible person w/excellentrefs to care for 17-month-old daughter in ourhome (Full-time). Call Mr. Winkler 962-1907 or241-5230.Security guard. Must be advanced grad stu¬dent. Study on the job. Must be flexibleWeekdays, graveyard 4.25/hr. Call Jim 7528990 after 4.After-school child-care. My home on campus.3-4 days/wk. May share. Good pay. Male ok.Call 241-7545after 6 p.m.SERVICESJUDITH TYPES and has a memory.955-4417. PhoneLARRY'S MOVING & DELIVERY. Furnitureand boxes. Household moves. Cartons, tape,padding dolly available. 743-1353.UNIVERSITY TYPING SERVICEWordprocessing and EditingOne block from Regenstein LibraryJames Bone, 363-0522Trio Con Brio Classical 8. light popular musicfor weddings & other events. Call 643-5007.Hyde Park movers household & small apt'sdiscount prices to staff 8. students free packingcartons delvd n/c many other services 493-9122.PROFESSIONAL TYPING SERVICE. Goodreliable service; large or small projects.Reasonable, competitive rates. 752-6972.BOOKCASES-Custom-made from solid oakbirch or pine, and delivered stained, oiled, var¬nished or painted. Call David Loehr at 684 2286.FOR SALEDo you send videos to friends or relativesoverseas? Convert them to PAL or SECAM atVideo Conversions International. Call forspecial rates! 726-6556.79 Horizon 4 dr hatchback standard transmis¬sion, new tires, runs great. $1,100 firm. Karen962-8296.SCENES5th week got you down? Take a break and relaxat the GALA Coffeehouse. Free food, friends,and fun! 10/29. 9:00. 5615 S. Woodlawn.Interested in current events in political-economy . Join the Central American ReadingGroup. Focus on Central America, but open toworldwide developments. Tues. 7:30 IdaNoyes. PERSONALSSTUDY THE BIBLE by radio. Listen to"GRACE TO YOU" with John MacArthur onWCFL 1000 AM 8:30 am & pm M-F. WMBI 1100AM 7:30 am M-F. WMBI 90.1 FM 10:30 am M-F.To Lori, Randy, Tom, Steve, Dave and Rene of"ON CALL". ..I LOVE YOURIDES2 U of C employees from Hammond, IN are in¬terested in car pooling. Call Kathy at 962-9577.PETSIf you can help "Midnite" please call 667-4940or 753-1711 ext. 322. Details in Maroon of Fri¬day, October 25.THE MEDICI DELIVERSDaily from 4 p.m. call 667-7394.FREE ORGAN RECITALSThomas Wikman plays the beautiful baroqueorgan at Chicago Theological Seminary 12:30PM every TUES. FREE. 5757 S. University.A CLASSIC RESIDENCEINACLASSIC LOCATIONFIFTY TWO HUNDREDSOUTH BLACKSTONETHE BLACKWOODLuxury, high rise apartmentbuilding in the Hyde Park area nowoffering a limited aelsction of oneand two bedroom apartments.Situated near the Dlinbis Central,University of Chicago, HarperCourt and only a short walk fromthe lake, our apartments feature cen¬tral air conditioning, individuallycontrolled heat, ceramic tile, securi¬ty intercom, new appliances andwall to wall carpeting. Onebedrooms from only $475, twobedrooms from $575. Ask about ourstudent and faculty discount.684-8666 UNSURE ABOUTABORTIONDO YOU HAVE OPTIONS?Free pregnancy counseling with licensedclinical social workers. Free pregnancytesting also available. Call 561-5288.FEELING DEPRESSED& DOWN?If so, you may qualify to participate in a studyto evaluate medication preference. Earn $150for your participation in this 4 week study. In¬volves only commonly-prescribed or over-the-counter drugs. If you are between 21 & 35 yearsold and in good health, call 962-3560 between8:30 & 11:30 a m. for further information.Refer to study D. Ask for Karen.STATIONERY FOR SALE3-ring binded 1 dozen $14 magazine file 1 dozen$14 roll-a-dex $14 Call 285-2439.CONCERNEDABOUTYOUR WEIGHT?Research subjects who have weight concernsare needed to participate in a study of drugpreference and mood No experimental drugsand minimal time involved. Subjects will bepaid for participating. For further informa¬tion, call Karen, 8:30-11:30am., 962-3560.AMIGA IS COMING256K ram, only $1,295.Call Cybersystems, Inc. 363 5082.COLUMBIA UNIVERSITYIN THE CITY OFNEW YORK SCHOOLOF INTERNATIONALANDPUBLIC AFFAIRSFor those interested in the Master of International Affairs or Master in Public Administration, MarJean Krokey, Assistant Dean of theSchool of International and Public Affairs Col¬umbia University will be on campus, Thurs¬day, October 31, 1985. Sign-up at Career Place¬ment Center, Reynolds Club.200. Small groupmeetings from 12:00 to 2:00.APHERESIS DONORSWe Need You. In the past if you have been anapheresis donor or if you would like to be one,call the Univ. of Chicago Blood Bank 962 6247.SEEKINGTREATMENTFOR ANXIETYSelected volunteers will receive 6 weeks of freetreatment for anxiety at the University ofChicago Medical Center in return for par¬ticipating in a 3 week study of medicationpreference. Study involves only commonly-prescribed or over-the-counter drugs. Par¬ticipants must be between 21 8< 55 years old andin good health. Call 962-3560 for further in¬formation. Mon.-Fri. 8:30 to 11:30 a.m. Ask forKaren.DO YOU KNOWWHAT'S GOING ON?Are you lonely or confused? Hotline listens andhas information and referrals. Call us. 753-1777, 7 p.m. to 7 a.m., 7 days a week.EDWARDO'S FOR LUNCH10 min. service in dining rm. from quick-lunchmenu or it's free! Also fast courteous lunchdelivery. Edwardo's, 1321 E.57th, PH 241-7960JEWISH WOMENIN SCIENCE CASH FOR MEALCOUPONS$80 per booklet or $l/coupon; 288 5406.ATTENTION CO-EDVOLLEYBALL MANAGERSThere will be a mandatory meeting u >scheduling and rules Nov. 6 12:30 p.m. afn >the IM council meeting.TURKEYTROTOn Nov. 5, 1985 at 3:30 p.m. at Midway fieic-There will be a one mile race. Top 3 finisher-, -ieach division will receive a T-shirt.FICTION WORKSHOPA few seats open. Intense, unique, proven. Sun.noon. Fee $195. Call Molly: 667-0673.ANTIGONE-CGTCONCRETE GOTHIC'S LATEST PRODUC¬TION. Tickets on sale NOW in Reynolds Club.Discounts for advance sales. $3.50 with UCID$4 & $5 at door, call 684-2319 for res.WOMEN IN BRAZIL3 videos: abortion in Brazil, women heads ofhouseholds in Rio, woman organized schoc inRio slum. Wed., Oct. 30, 7:30. Ida Noyes WLounge.LOX! BAGELS!H i I lei has a brunch every Sunday 11 to 1 p.m at5715 S. Woodlawn. Lox, bagel 8, cream cheeseplus Sunday Trib, NY Times, coffee, tea & OJAll for $2.00.GAY?LES?UNSURE?We can't make decisions for you, but we willshare our concerns and feelings in an open ur.-pressured atmosphere. Tues 8 p.m. 5615 S.Woodlawn.TIMEOUT5th week got you down? Take a break and rr axat the GALA Coffeehouse. Free food, friencs,and fun! 10/29,9:00. 5615 S. Woodlawn.FOLK DANCE CONCERTUC's 23rd International Folk Dance Con-features dance groups Wakayagi Sm>ukrania, Serbian Youth Ensemble, The FBrothers, and more. 8 p.m. Sat., Nc.Mandel Hall. Tickets $6, $5 students.FOLK DANCE FESTIVALHILLEL FRIDAY FORUM PRESENTS DR.SUSAN MESCHEL Jewish women in science.Miriam of Alexandria (1st century) Sarah ofWurzburg (15 century) Emmy Woether, LiseMeitner and Rosalind Franklin (20th century).Friday, November 1, 8.30 P.M. 5715 S.Woodlawn. Learn ethnic dances from the best at thisyear's Fall Folk Festival, featuring Dick Crum(Balkan), Andor Czompo (Hungarian), andDavid Henry (Greek), Nov. 1-3 at Sunny Gym,5823 S. Kenwood. Workshops Fri. 8 p.m., Sat.,Sun. at 9, 12:30 and 3:30. For more info callJohn 324-1247 or Tom 363-5214.BABYSITTER WANTEDExperienced babysitter needed to sit part-time(15-20hr/wk) beginning now. Mothers helper toshare newborn/toddler. Call evenings 667 8429.PERFORMANCE TICKETSThe International House has discount ticketsavailable to the performance of CATS on Fri.,Nov. 8, and to Lyric Opera performances, AN¬NA BOLENA on Thurs., Nov. 14, and ICAPULET 8. I MONTECCHI on Fri., Dec. 6.Call 753-2274.VARSITY SOFTBALLOrganizational meeting for anyone interestedin playing varsity softball-Tuesday, Nov 5 at 6p.m. in the Henry Crown Field HouseClassroom. Contact Coach Vance if you cannotattend Bartlett Gym 127.962-9556.PUB HALLOWEENCostume Dance Party, Thurs., Oct 31 '0-2Beer specials 10:30 12. Prizes for MostKeprehensible & Most Bourgeois costjr-esMembers, 21 + .travelhyrieeark INC,FOREIGN & DOMESTIC TRAVEL•AIR • INDEPENDENT• AMTRAK •GROUP• CRUISES • TOUR PACKAGESMajor Credit Cards AcceptedAIRLINE TICKETS AT AIRPORT PRICESCOMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS INVITED667-39005503 S. HARPER (0n» Bfc Wert W Nr* Uwasty Bat Vtxrt T>» Coma Fran Previous LautonJThe Chicago Maroon-Tuesday, October 29. 1985 ISifU University of Chicago Department of Music presents :Art Out-of-thus-World Halloween Concert- In the Year ofCrUSTAV HolstUNtV€RStTV SVMpHONV ORCH£STIBARBARA SCHUBCRT. CONDUCTO• Maruiel t-Lall •57 th Street & University AvenueLTwo Performances ; 5 p.m. Family Concert£>:30p.m. University ConcertAdmission $1.oo COSTVWCS eNCOUR^GCD l» * THURSDAY7,OCTOB€R 31I mI BragmF;BT IgjYHIBBBBBBB PC SOFTWARE MINI COURSES• Formerly available only to Graduate Schoolof Business students & faculty.• Now available to the entire University.CLASS SCHEDULE AND REGISTRATION FORMIntroduction to Micro Computer $20.00Session *5 Wed. 11/13 6 30 - 9:30 p.m.Session *6 Thurs. 11/14 6:30-930 p.m.Introduction to Dbase II $35.00Session *2 Wed. 11/6 6:30-9:30 p.m.Sat. 11/9 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.Introduction to Wordmarc $20.00Session *1 Wed. 10/30 630-9:30 p.m.Session *2 Sun. 11/10 11:00a.m.-200p.m.Introduction to Lotus 123 $35.00Session *7 Mon. 11/4 6 30-9:30 p.m.Fri. 11/8 2:00-500 p.m.Session •8 Mon. 11/11 6:30-9:30 p.m.Fri. 11/15 200-500 p.m.Session *9 Sun. 11/17 11:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m.Tues. 11/19630-9:30 p.m,Session *10 Wed. 11/20 6:30 p.m.-9 30 p.m.Sat. 11/23 9:00 a.m. -12:00 p.m.Advanced Lotus 123 $35.00Session *2 Sun. 11/3 11:00 a m. - 2:00 p.m.Tues. 11/5 6 30-9:30 p.m.Session *3 Wed. 11/13 6:30-9:30 p.m.Sat. 11/16 9 00 a m. -12:00 p.m.Session *4 Mon. 11/18 6:30 - 9:30 p.m.Fri. 11/22 2:00-500 p.m. Stuart 101Stuart 104Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310Walker 310NAMEPHONE *To Register:1. Identify a 1st & 2nd choice for each class of interest.2. Attach a check payable to "PC-XPERTS” in the correctamount.3. Mail this ad and check to:PC-XPERTS5725 S. Maryland Ave.Chicago, IL 60637ORBring completed ad and attached check to theComputation Center, Business Office, 1155 60th St. C.S.A.ELECTIONSPETITIONS A VAILABLE NOWIN MAILR00M1215 POSITIONS OPEN1 PIERCEHITCHCOCK & SNELL 1 WOODWARDBLACKST0NE 1 SH0RELANDBRECKINRIDGE 1BROADVIEWBJ OFF CAMPUS1 FRATERNITIES2 COMMUTERS*Petitions are due in the mailroom byFriday, Nov. 1 with 10 signatures. Positionsare open to any college student living in the|given area. Questions? See the CSAmailfolder. Elections will be in themailroom 7th week.* A commuter is anyone who has never lived in univer¬sity housing or has joined the Commuting StudentsAssociation (the other CSA).