The Chicago Maroon“Solitary, singing in the West, I strike up for a new world.” —Walt WhitmanVol. 89, No. 20 The University of Chicago Copyright 1979 The Chicago Maroon Friday, November 9, 1979Dam to replace Johnson as ProvostJohnson toretire in JulyBy Jaan EliasIn July, D. Gale Johnson, theEliakim Hastings Moore Distin¬guished Service Professor of Eco¬nomics, will leave the provost posi¬tion after five years in that office.“When Mrs. Gray became presi¬dent,” Johnson said, “we agreedthat I would stay on for two moreyears. It would not be appropriateto change the president and theprovost simultaneously.” Afterfive years, Johnson said he hadbeen provost for quite enoughtime.In a letter to the faculties, Graysaid that Johnson’s “contributionto the academic health and to thewhole life of the University is im¬measurable, and his commitmentto rigorous standards of qualityhas been unflagging.”Johnson served as the Universi¬ty’s second-in-command and chiefbudgetary officer during lean fi¬nancial times. He said that hismajor accomplishment was thesame as anyone’s would havebeen: “to retain top faculty and toattract a select number of new fac¬ulty all within the framework of avery tight budgetary situation.”During Johnson’s tenure as pro¬vost, a hiring freeze on facultymembers was put on. Johnson saidthat further reductions are stillnecessary but “not drastically andnot immediately.”As provost, Johnson servedunder both presidents Wilson andGray. “The major difference be¬tween administrations was in thestyle of organization,” he said.Gray, Johnson said, worksthrough the formal officers of theUniversity in making budgetarydecisions while Wilson did not relyon formal channels as much.“Budgetary decisions are mademore collectively under Mrs.Gray.”The University’s fiscal 1979 bud¬get deficit, projected at $3.8 millionin February, was cut to $483,000,according to figures released byUniversity provost D. Gale John¬son.The smaller deficit was achievedto a large part of the carryover of agift of one million dollars from theprevious fiscal year and a 20 per¬cent increase in unrestricted giftsto the University.The fiscal year 1979 budget, of$280 million, was written duringthe presidency of John T. Wilsonand was projected to be balanced.In February, President Gray pro¬jected that University expendi¬tures would exceed the budgetedamount by $1.36 million and thatincome would fall $2.46 millionbelow the expected amount, there¬by creating a $3.8 million deficit. MaroonGale JohnsonHe attributed the difference inorganizational styles largely to adifference in the backgrounds ofthe two presidents. Gray came tothe presidency from outside of theUniversity, whereas Wilson hadserved extensively in the adminis¬tration before becoming presi¬dent.Both presidents are similar,Johnson said, in that they had very“strong” styles. They were “will¬ing to make a decision and stickwith it.”A similar steadfastness is neces¬sary in the provost’s office. 'Beingprovost means being able to makedecisions without getting ulcers,”Johnson said.Turn to Page 15Most of the increased expendi¬tures allotted in February went tothe library. $1 million was added tothe library’s budget because, ac¬cording to Gray, the library budgetwas “so tight it couldn’t do what ithas to do.”The extra money allowed the li¬brary to reverse a trend which sawthe purchase of few books eachyear.The other major overrun pro¬jected in February was $600,000 forincreased energy costs. Despitethe cold winter, the Universitywas able to hold energy costs downand energy costs ran only $216,000over the original budget.According to a letter sent to thefaculties by the provost, “Effec¬tive energy conservation effortscontributed in an important way tothe 1978/79 financial outcome.” Dam tohold secondhighest officeBy Andrew PatnerPresident Gray Monday appoint¬ed Kenneth W. Dam to be provost ofthe University, effective July 1,1980. Dam will succeed D. GaleJohnson (see accompanyingstory).Dam is the Harold J. and MarionF. Green Professor of Internation¬al Legal Studies in the Law Scholwhere he is also director of the lawand economics program. He wasspokesman for the committee ofthe council of the Faculty Senatelast year and is a member of thecommittee on public policy stu¬dies.Gray said she made the indefi¬nite appointment after a series ofdiscussions that began in theSpring Quarter and offered Damthe job about six weeks ago. Offi¬cial appointment was delayedpending approval by the executivecommittee of the board of Trusteeswhich was given at the commit¬tee’s meeting Monday, Gray said.Dam, 47, is a graduate of the Uni¬versity of Kansas and of the Uni¬versity’s Law School where he wasgreatly influenced by EdwardLevi, president emeritus, andAaron Director, professor emeri¬tus, to study the relationship be¬tween law and economics. Afterspending two years in privatepractice, he came to the LawSchool faculty in 1960.“1 had not planned on teachingwhen I started in practice,” Samsaid Wednesday. “But EdwardLevi was very persuasive.”Whether Dam will have the samepower of persuasion as Levi hadwhen he held administrative postsBoth the nonacademic and aca¬demic units held their expendi¬tures at or below the budgetedlevels. The auxiliary enterprises(residence halls and commons,married student housing, bus ser¬vice and the bookstore) had ayears-end deficit of $280,000 in¬stead of the budgetted $500,000 def¬icit.“It was not so many years agothat the subsidy from unrestrictedincome for such activities was asmuch as $1 million.” Johnsonnoted in his letter to the faculties.Beside the unanticipated in¬crease in unrestricted gifts whichwas 20 percent higher than lastyear, other increases in incomeover the February projection werein student fees, earnings on tempo¬rary investments, endowment in¬come, and indirect cost recovery. Victor GoldbergKenneth Damremains to be seen. As provostDam will be responsible for hiringand tenure decisions at a universi¬ty with a stated policy of reducingfaculty size and it will be his job toattract junior faculty to a neigh¬borhood with a tight, and expen¬sive, housing market.“It will be difficult,” Dam said.“Persuasion will be needed. Butit’s a national problem not limitedto the University. I don’t have an¬swers. It would be unwise for me toprejudge tenure policies. I want totake the time (until the appoint¬ment becomes effective) to under¬stand these things.”Over the next eight months. Damwill work with Gray and Johnson intheir administrative deliberationsand will meet with the variousdeans and directors. He will alsowrap up his current research proj¬ect at the Law School: a book onthe legal and institutional historyof the international monetary sys¬tem.“It’s an attempt to see what les¬sons we can learn from the past inwhat seems to be a very murky fu¬ture.”Dam has long been interested inproblems of economics and gov¬ernment regulation, and his viewson those subjects fit very comfort¬ably into the Chicago School of eco¬nomic thought. Cited by Fortunemagazine as one of “the men whosell the free market,” and by Es¬quire as one of the “who’s who” ofAmerican neoconservatives. Damhas been a sharp critic of federalregulation in areas ranging fromcontrol of oil prices to preventionof supermergers. Washington experienceFrom 1971 to 1973, Dam was dep¬uty to George P Schultz, who lefthis University faculty position tobecome a member of RichardNixon’s cabinet. After workingwith and succeeding James Schle-singer (“a very able man”) at theOffice of Management and Budget,Dam directed the U.S. Council onEconomic Policy.Last year, he and Schultz pub¬lished an insiders’ view of theirWashington work. In EconomicPolicy Behind the Headlines, theypresented a government that was“overchecked and overbalanced.”“I had not really believed thatuntil I had experienced disillusion¬ment with government first hand,”Dam said. “I don't see any changefor worse or for better in the imme¬diate future. These are seriousproblems of government organiza¬tion.”Dam has introduced courses inthe Law School that “look at theentire gamut of decision-making inrespect to the economy,” accord¬ing to Gerhard Casper, dean of theLaw School.“His has been a very importantcontribution to our teaching andcurriculum,” Casper said. Caspersaid that he and his colleagues“will have to do some looking” toreplace Dam. who will continue hisresearch but have little time forteaching.During the controversy sur¬rounding the Pick Award given toRobert McNamara, Dam wasspokesman for the faculty council,but did veryr little speaking outsideof council sessions. He attendedthe award dinner but does not saythat he supported the award.WTien asked if making the awardwas the right thing for the Univer¬sity to do. Dam said, “We ll findout when the (award review) com¬mittee's report is made. 1 hope thatwill be an opportunity to test anddiscuss that question.”As to his role in the McNamaradebate. Dam said, “The confiden¬tiality of the (council) committee'sdeliberation is important. But 1don’t want to endorse your inter¬pretation” (that he supported theaward).CandidAlthough Dam has not held anyprevious university administrativeposts, he looks forward to his workas provost.“I did not come to a university tobe a university administrator and Ihave avoided taking administra¬tive positions in the past at otheruniversities and so forth. It's be¬cause I plan to be here till I retirethat I feel a duty to do some admin¬istrative work here.Dam has worked closely withGray and said, “one of the reasonsI went into the job was because ofthe opportunity to work with Mrs.Gray.“I have been very candid withMrs. Gray and I think that is how 1will work with her. In the end I as¬sume. 1 hope, that we will be inagreement on academic con¬cerns.”Budget gap closed by 87%IBM'S Series/1 minicomputerwill visit the campus at the CCETuesday through Thursday,November 13-15.You are cordially invited todrop in for a visit between9 a.m. and 5 p.m.on those days,or attend the S/1 seminarsi scheduled at 3 p.m. Tuesdayand 10 a.m. Thursday. When does the mt .JMoSpTTiltraining stop and WW Bj jgjjthe doing start? naccept their challengesBecause we recogni/e individual diflerences ■M^Bk ^enable you to start doing J||iWhen does the training stop'7 It never does m * pH * jjWggP mScott Paper Company is an equal opportunity g (- .1 isiR * ”emptoyer. mil p tQlL.jpContact your placement otlice for information*SCOTTDOC FILMSFriday November 9Paul Mazersky’sAn Unmarried Woman6:30, 9:30,11:15Saturday November 10Franco Brusati’sBread and Chocolate7:15 & 9:30Sunday November 11An Evening of Documentary filmsWerner Herzog’s LA SOUFRIERE7:15 and 9:30Peter Kubleka’s OUR TRIP TO AFRICA7:45 and 9:45Jean Rouch’s LES MAITRES FOUS8:00 and 10:00Pare Lorentz’s THE RIVER8:30 and 10:30Monday Novemberl2Budd Boetticher’sThe Missing Juror7:30Don Siegel’sPrivate Hell 368:45ALL films shown in Cobb HallMonday films $1.25, all others $1.50 THE TEXTBOOK DEPARTMENTUNIVERSITY BOOKSTORESECOND FLOORANNOUNCESA SALEHUNDREDS OF TITLESAT I FSSTHAN HALF PRICEONE WEEK ONLY:NOVEMBER 12-162 — The Chicago Maroon — Friday, November 9, 1979Woodward CourtArthur Mann: rediscovering the SixtiesBy Chris IsidoreIn contrast to the first two WoodwardCourt lectures, both of which attempted tovisit the future, this Sunday’s program willrevisit the past. Arthur Mann, Preston andSterling Morton Professor of History, willspeak on “The 1960s Revisited” at 8:30Mann has long been interested in studyingsocial movements, and his most recentbook, The One and the Many, deals partlywith the turmoil of the Sixties. But instead oftrying to pass judgement on the actions andturmoil of these times, he attempts to ex¬plore the effects of this disorder onAmerican society. This will also be the aimof Sunday’s lecture.Mann begins his book by presenting thedisagreement among historians about theAmerican spirit during the Sixties. ArthurSchlesinger, Jr. takes the position that “theturmoil, the confusion, even the violencemay well be the birth pangs of a new epochin the history of man.” At the other ex¬treme. Mann quotes Richard Hofstadter assaying “If I ever get around to writing ageneral history of the recent past. I’m goingto call the chapter on the Sixties ‘The Age ofRubbish.’ ”Mann does not go on to judge his col¬leagues’ opinions. “Both statements aresignificant because of the extremes thatthey represent. I think that neither man wasright, nor do I think that time has vindicatedone or the other,” Mann said. “I quoted bothmen not to say that one was right or theother was wrong, nor that the truth liesbetween the two statements, but to illustratethe sense that things were up for grabs . . .and to show that those were divisive times.These were the significant things about theSixties.”Mann cites such divisive issues as theVietnam War, the civil rights struggle, thechanging relations between the sexes, andthe women’s liberation movement as forceswhich worked to polarize America duringthe Sixties. Mann feels that even while thegoals and achievements of those forces weregoof for American society, the polarization which resulted from them was destructive.“All these changes had the effect oferoding that very fragile sense that thiscountry, so large, so varied in its population,nevertheless had things that pulled peopletogether,” he said. “I don’t think that sensehas returned. There are not an awful lot ofoptimists about America today; not aboutits leadership, not about its institutions. Ithink people are reasonably happy abouttheir personal lives, but unhappy about theconcerns that are common to all of us. So Ido not think the country is where it was in1960.”“I was born an optimist and I want to beoptimistic. To play the role of the naysayeris contrary to my personal chemistry. I’mnot pessimistic. What I’m saying is thatright now, although the passionatedivisiveness, the abrasive confrontations ofthe late 1960s, early 1970s are gone the coun¬try still has to recover its sense ofwholeness, of pride, of confidence.“One of the things one keeps hearingagain and again, with regard to SenatorKennedy, is that maybe he’s the person tounify the country. That expression is ob¬viously coming from a feeling that we arenot unified.”As with most people who talk about thesocial forces of the Sixties or of any otherdecade, Mann does not restrict his discus¬sion to the years 1960 - 1969. “If one equatesthe 1960s with the sense that things are com¬ing apart, spinning out of control and gettingworse, then you have to take some point inthe late 1960s. This will vary. I’ve been play¬ing this game with people. I’ll ask ‘When didyou walk over to the TV and turn off thenews, and say “I can’t take it any more!” ?’For a whole lot of people the worst yearseemed to be 1968.”President Carter has discussed this“malaise of spirit” that Mann refers to. ButCarter points to 1963 and the assassinationof John F. Kennedy as the beginning, whileMann believes this is far too early. “Therewas a feeling of unity that prevailed (in1963). There was a very quick successionfrom Kennedy to Johnson, and then Johnson Dan BreslauArthur Manngot his way in regards to every piece oflegislation that he wanted. This wastestimony to the power of consensus. Nine¬teen sixty-three was a bad moment for sure,but there was a very quick recovery. Thework went forward; ‘We’ll eliminate pover¬ty, we’ll eliminate the slums, we’ll solve theracial problem, and we’ll get to the moon.’ Itwas all very upbeat.”When the polarization did come, much ofit was along age lines. Mann attaches greatimportance to this split. “My sense is that inthe 1960s, you had for the first time a youthculture of genuine size that was antagonistic to, or even intolerant of, the values of olderpeople. It has long been a function of theyoung to think they are going to do better,but the manifestations of this in the Sixtieswere unprecedented.”The subtitle of Mann’s most recent book is“Reflections on the American Identity.”Mann has been making these reflections allthrough his academic career. He taught atM.I.T. from 1948-55, and at Smith College inMassachusetts from 1955 until coming herein 1966. Mann has written more than half adozen books dealing with American history,including two acclaimed volumes of a biog¬raphy of Fiorello LaGuardia.Mann is a very cautious speaker. He talksslowly and carefully, making a very con¬scious effort not to state something as a factunless he feels it can be proven. He prefacesmany of his statements with “I think,” or“In my opinion.” He is also relectant todraw any definite conslusions about whowas right or wrong in the Sixties, or whowon or lost.“Depending on personal values — and thisreflects my values — one might say that thebreakthrough that blacks made was a good’not only for themselves but for the wholesociety. Also, the breakthrough that womenhave made into the economy was good. Ac¬companying these goods were a lot ofunpleasantnesses and confrontations.American society took a terrific battering.The result was to leave a whole lot of people(asking) ‘What is it that we share, what dowe have in common, and what is it thatholds us together? Is America just a collec¬tion of contending factions?”“Some of the politically active peoplemight like to see a return to the awarenessand activism of the Sixties, but I think few inthe public would like to return to it. The votefor Nixon in ’72 was an unhappy vote. Theoverwhelming majority voted againstMcGovern and the McGovern movement.“For me, one lesson of the Sixties was areminder of how fragile things are. but alsoa reminder of the resilience of American in¬stitutions. This may sound paradoxical, butI don’t think it is.”A 74* trip forBy Calvin ThrillingWe were eagerly awaiting Mayor Byrne’s internationalfood festival at Navy Pier last weekend when an item inthe Sun-Times, near the obituaries, caught our attention.Midway Airlines, a child of airline deregulation, was in¬augurating its new service to Cleveland, Detroit, andKansas City by charging one percent of its normal faresfor all flights during the weekend.We jumped when we saw Kansas City. Thirty sevencents, one way. Kansas City, of course, is the home of Ar¬thur Bryant’s ribs, Winstead’s Hamburgers, and otherEat it!good things vegetarians don’t touch. We revised our week¬end plans immediately.Just to be sure, we made a quick dash out to MidwayAirport to confirm that the deal was for real. It was. Tick¬ets were to go on sale an hour before the flights, firstcome, first serve. No credit cards, we were told. Only one¬way tickets would be sold, meaning the wait at Midwayairport would have to be repeated in Kansas City. Later,this stipulation caused some of our “friends” to back outof the trip.We arrived at Midway shortly after 10 pm, as ChannelTwo was packing up its mini-cam and Channel Seven wasin the middle of a live report about the people who wouldstay up all night to fly for under forty cents. We took ourplace about fifty spaces back, confident of making thefirst flight, and the long wait began. Our company consist¬ed of large families and young couples (many of whomwould apparently be traveling in violation of the MannAct).When not thinking about ribs our attention turned toMidway Airport itself. Once the busiest airport in theworld, it handed over that honor to O’Hare when the latteropened in 1962. Midway became a ghost town. The gateslooked as if they had been abandoned the day before yes¬terday and weeds were springing up in the parking lot.But Midway is a great airport for at least one reason: noHare Krishnas, no Moonies, no U.S. Labor Party (“Nu¬clear energy is safer than Ted Kennedy’s Car” says one oftheir posters at O’Hare). It is indeed possible to spendeight hours in an airport without hearing “Certain groups,in an exercise of their first amendment rights...” Nor didthe wait deter us, since we’ve paid full fare to fly out of O’Hare to places like Newark, and ended ud waiting nineor ten hours because of delayed or lost airplanes. Andthere were no lines to get into the bathrooms.People in line began to stir as 6 am drew near, when thetickets were to go on sale. Places in line were ferociouslyguarded and cutters were identified and thrown out ofline, in part with the help of Dom, an Andy Frain usherwho may or may not have been five feet high. Those nearthe front of the line scanned the flanks for any unfamiliarfaces making their way to the ticket counter — when thetickets finally went on sale everyone in line knew every¬one else’s face. As it became apparent that thirty or forty people wouldnot mysteriously show up and bump us from the firstflight we anxiously clutched our 37 cents (in exactchange i and leaned toward the ticket counter. The womanbehind the ticket counter, who bore a striking resemb-lence to Jane Byrne, smiled as she handed us our ticket, astamped index card. We were instructed to write ourname on it and proceed to Gate A-2.Exhilarated, we waltzed toward Gate A-2, and were sur¬prised to see the metal detector. Somehow it had neverTurn to Page 9Friday, November 9, 1979 — The Chicago Maroon — 3KIMBARK HALLCondominiums$2000 DISCOUNT UNTIL JAN. 1980 • 80%MORTGAGE LOANS AT APPROX. 11%AVAILABLEThe developers are offering model units forinspection every Sat. and Sun. between 1and 5 p.m.36 opts:24 - 1 bedroom, 1 bath from 30,350-37,0006 - 2 bedrooms, 1 bath from 37,000-38,8506 - 2 bedrooms, 2 bath from 46,000-46,900All apartments include new kitchens and appliances,new bathrooms, carpeting and decorating (colors ofyour choice), triple-track storm windows and kitchenstorm doors, modern laundry facilities and individuallocker space.Your inspection is invited,5126 S. Kimbark Ave. - Phone 643-4489Harry A. Zisook & Sons, Agts.786-9200i Ruby's Merit ChevroletSPECIALDISCOUNT PRICESfor all STUDENTS andFACULTY MEMBERSJust present your University ofChicago Identification Card.As Students or Faculty Membersof the University of Chicago you areentitled to special money-savingDISCOUNTS on Chevrolet Parts,Accessories and any new or usedChevrolet you buy from Merit Chev¬rolet Inc. 2GMQUALTTYSERVICE PARTS ’ her 11 I hut Grrtie |^»6' \l teclinnu uhGENERAL MOTORS BAHTS DIVISION GtMIM vVJGU Hun* ' lRUBY’SCHEVROLET72nd & Stony Island 684-0400Open Daily 9-9, Sat. 9-5 Part* open Sat. 'til Noonw; RUBY’SVOLKSWAGEN r72nd & Stony Island 684-0400Opon Daily »-♦, So*. 9-J Part* open Sat. til NoonTHE FUGUPLANThe Untold Story of the Japaneseand the JewsDuring World War IIRABBI MARVIN TOKAYERformerly Rabbi of the JewishCommunity in TokyoSUNDAY-NOVEMBER 11-7:30 PMHILLEL FOUNDATION - 5715 Woodlawn IT'S A LONG WAY TOTHE FINISH LINE.Everything's ahead of you and nothing stands in yourway. It's time to try your legs. To get up and go. Andthere's no better place to do it than with the companythat keeps America moving, Clark.Our worldwide, fortune 200 organization canoffer you the opportunity to grow and improve in awide range of career paths. As leaders in the manufac¬ture of heavy equipment for farming, construction,industry and transportation, we provide you withchoice. And challenge.We're Clark. Spanning 119 nations. Withsales in excess of $1.5 billion. A cohesive team ofprofessionals, 21,000 strong. We re Clark and wemove things. Including careers.Clark representatives will visit your campus onFRIDAY, November 16thStop by and find out about us;or see your Placement Office for further details.CHIRKAn Equal Opportunity Employer M/FLOOK: IT'S NATIONAL LAMPOON'SNOVEMBER LOVE ISSUEThis issue of National Lampoon contains some pretlspicy material. Some people unused to such spichumor had to drink glass after glass of water whireading the love issue.You can learn alot about all kinds of love froithe November issue. If you're really ignorant, you calearn one hell of a lot.But don't take our word for it. Pick up a copy atyour bookstore or newsstand today. And if you getsome kind of a disease, don't blame us. You pickedup the magazine. It's your fault.4 — The Chicago Maroon — Friday, November 9, 1979Natalee Rosenstein, a Clark et al plaintiff, shown at the University in 1969The radicalsBy Claudia MagatLike members of any generation, peoplewho were students during the 1960s experi¬enced a wide range of political and culturalodyssies. Yet veterans of the 1960s are espe¬cially intriguing in where they went andwhat they did after graduating — or not gra¬duating — from college. Witness a NewYorker cartoon that appeared last August,depicting an enormous outdoor cocktailparty, with the caption, “Tenth AnniversaryWoodstock Reunion. ”This is the first installment in a sporadicseries of interviews with people who wereUniversity of Chicago students during the1960s.Even by 1969, the year of the University ofChicago Dixon sit-in, Students for a Demo¬cratic Society (SDS) was breaking up intoseveral smaller political factions. The mainrift resulted from conflicting views of theblack liberation struggle in this country.One faction — the Revolutionary YouthMovement — was a strong support group forblack nationalism and the Black PantherParty, and believed that the black struggleprovided a major incentive and force forrevolution. The other faction — the Progres¬sive Labor Party — maintained that therewas one large struggle which had itsstrength in blacks and whites working to¬gether. A specifically black struggle, theyargued, was ideologically and concretely re¬actionary.Susie Waysdorf and Eve Rosahn wereboth members of SDS who followed and con¬tinue to support the black liberation strug¬gle. Waysdorf graduated from the Universi¬ty of Chicago; Rosahn attended ColumbiaUniversity. In the following interview theydiscuss their experiences during the 1960s,and trace their present political commit¬ments back to those years.CM: When I think about SDS, the VietnamWar comes to mind as the focus or rallyingpoint of activity. Maybe I think of the stu¬dents who went down South to organizevoter registration, or of the summers whenstudents went into the cities to work withblacks. But that was early on. How did theblack liberation struggle fit into SDS later,after 1967, when it had emerged as an orga¬nization composed mainly of white leftists?ER: The 1968 student strike at Columbiabrought that question into the foreground.There were different positions, for example,on the direction taken by black studentsthere, who occupied a building and refusedto let white students participate in the sit-in.You had to make a decision then, to under¬stand their actions. And we were, of course,concerned about Columbia’s expansion intoHarlem. The university wanted to build agymnasium on the site of a park in Harlem. We were working with community groups toprevent the university from building thegym. They eventually agreed to share thespace, and that was a major concession, amajor victory. But it came from fear thatblack people were going to burn Columbiadown. So SDS was dealing somewhat withissues related to black oppression. . .SW: In that sense Columbia was similar tothe University of Chicago, it was a matter ofhistory, of being a white island in a blackcommunity. Especially during the Dixon sit-in, SDS started to confront that reality. Wewere asking if student power means partici¬pating in University policy-making, orwhether student power means throwing ourweight behind people that the University isoppressing. The Dixon sit-in centered onMarlene Dixon, but that was a mistake. Itwas a month after Fred Hampton and MarkClark, leaders of the Black Panther Party,had been murdered by the state (the FBI),and the Vietnam War was at its height.There was trouble at home and in Vietnam.We should have concentrated on thoseissues more than on Dixon.ER: The Columbia strike was more broadlybased perhaps. 'We were also campaigningagainst a think tank of which Columbia wasa member, the Institute for Defense Analy¬sis (IDA). Professors at Columbia and otherschools were being released from theirusual duties and were using university facil¬ities and time for defense research. Wewanted to get IDA off campus.CM: How did the Columbia strike actuallybegin?ER: Well, we went to the site of where thegymnasium would be built, and the copscame, and the students went back tocampus and just took over a building. Thepolice claimed it was an SDS conspiracythat had been in the works for months, butactually it was very spontaneous. Peoplewere furious. Martin Luther King had justbeen murdered, and the university had helda memorial service at which SDS led a walk¬out, saying that it was the biggest act of hy¬pocrisy possible. The walk-out had tremen¬dous impact on me, although I wasn’t yet amember of SDS. Anyway, there was an oc¬cupation from April 23 until April 30, whenthey made the first bust.CM: A friend who was at Columbia duringthe strike but who wasn’t terribly involved,although he was sympathetic, once told mehe became instantly radicalized by one pow¬erful image: the sight of hundreds of po¬licemen on horseback coming up Broadway.After that he did get involved. . .ER: Yes, it was very powerful. Thousandsof people were showing support by the end ofthe week, although initially there weremaybe 100 white students and 100 black stu¬dents actually occupying buildings. Andthere were probably only 100 black students in all attending the university then.CM: Was the Dixon sit-in at all inspired bythe Columbia strike?SW: When I got here in Fall of 1968, SDSshowed the movie “Columbia,” which wasabout the strike. There was some contactbetween SDS chapters at different universi¬ties, but mainly you just knew that universi¬ties were exploding, people were in mo¬tion.CM: Were you reading any of the books thatcame out about student rebellion, like TheStrawberry Statement?ER: I know at Columbia we didn’t thinkmuch of that book. Kunen was only peri¬pherally involved you know, and I guess wethought he exploited the situation. But therewas a good book that came out, Up Againstthe Ivy Wall, which was written by the edi¬tors of the Columbia Spectator. The Specta¬tor editors were very involved in the strikethemselves. . .CM: What about The Maroon?SW: We weren’t really very happy with TheMaroon. Oh, they covered the Dixon sit-in, Imean how could you ignore it, but they re¬mained akx f from the political activity,they weren’t involved.CM: One of the main criticisms that is le¬velled at SDS in retrospect is that it was avery sexist organization, that the entireNew Left was sexist in fact. The image isthat the women were making coffee and typ¬ing while the men were out demonstrating,or planning and making decisions. Do youagree with that?ER: The women’s movement was relativelyyoung at that time, and it wasn't until after1968 or 1969 that women really started think¬ing about a revolutionary women’s move¬ment. I know I was very inspired by thewomen in the Black Panther Party, theywere good strong examples of what it meansto be truly revolutionary. They taught usthat it is fine to deal with oppression ofwomen, but we should understand we aredealing as white women, and that you can’twin liberation separately, for white womenalone. There has to be total change, revolu¬tion. . . The women’s movement was part ofwhat SDS was fighting for, but that issuewas not as well-reported, it was buried, ob¬scured. . .CM: In the aftermath of the 1960s. many stu¬dents became totally disillusioned and dis¬gusted. and abandoned political activity asfutile. Some left the country7. Others re¬entered the mainstream, went on to gradu¬ate school or business or medical school, orwent back to college. You both joined theMay 19th Communist Organization, an orga¬nization of white, anti-imperialists. Eveworks with the Committee for the SuitAgainst Government Misconduct, and is aplaintiff in a lawsuit led by the NationalTask Force for COINTELPRO Litigationand Research. The suit is filed against theUnited States, and concerns the FBI COIN¬TELPRO program. Why did you stay in¬volved, and why did you choose this direc¬tion?SW: I view SDS as a stage in a larger strug¬gle. At a certain point, around 1970. SDS wasno longer viable, no longer a good way tooperate. I guess I saw a bigger picture,black liberation; between that and Vietnam,it became clearer that imperialism was thereal problem. The issues have not changedall that much: we were anti-imperialistthen, and we are anti-imperialist now. Itcomes down to that.ER: People went in different directions be¬cause everyone faced a different personalquestion about political involvement. Peo¬ple had to confront their own racism. Be¬cause of the struggles of blacks and Viet¬namese people, the choice became clearerfor white people, who you would have soli¬darity with. You had to confront the realityof white supremacy. But you didn't want toget too alienated, too estranged, that wasfrightening. If the pull was strong in that di¬rection. you would reenter the mainstream.We went a different way. And then, if youstayed committed, you had to make a deci¬sion about the black liberation struggle.CM: Kirkpatrick Sales's book, SDS, didn'treally address those issues at the end, whenit was all breaking down. . .ER: Yes, that's a problem with SDS. Theblack struggle issue became quite impor¬tant. There were questions at universitieslike Columbia and the University of Chica¬go. questions of admissions, urban renewal.. . The Progressive Labor Party said thoseweren’t real issues because any black per¬son who went to college was on his way tobecoming part of the bourgeoisie anyway,Friday, I so why bother. And there were all the con¬tradictions about being white in relationshipto a black struggle.CM : Could you discuss the suit a bit, and ex¬plain how a suit filed by white people is con¬nected to the black struggle?SW: First of all, you have to realize that thesuit’s premise is that oppression is verybroad in this country, and it has to be paidfor. Fighting COINTELPRO — not only theFBI activity during the 1960s but also now,since it is still going on — is aiming at thereal thing, the heart of oppression.ER: After the initial revelations aboutCOINTELPRO’s campaign against the NewLeft and members of the black liberationstruggle, the FBI launched a major publicrelations campaign about how they’dcleaned up their act, and FBI officials cameforth and conceded to all those terriblethings they did. They said yes, it was awful,and thank God it’s over, and yes yes it’strue, we tapped your phones and openedyour mail and broke into your apartmentsand spied on you and planned to kidnap yourchildren, but that’s all behind us now. It’seasy to swallow that line, to think thatCOINTELPRO really did end with Water¬gate, or when J. Edgar Hoover died. Yousee, now they are telling us what went on inCOINTELPRO — they concede to parts of itbut still deny they murdered Fred Hamptonand framed black revolutionary nationalistswho are still in jail.SW: The suit aims to expose the ongoing na¬ture of COINTELPRO — plaintiffs and law¬yers involved in this suit have beenharassed, and of course many people arestill in jail — and also to get at FBI files. De¬spite the Freedom of Information Act, it isstill quite difficult to obtain those files.Many files have been destroyed. Sometimesthey give you a hard time if you requestyour file; they’ll write back. “Sorry, we’venever heard of you, but if you tell us moreabout your political work we might be ableto help.’’ or they’ll just say, “We don’t havea file on you.” But we know the files arethere, because the files that have been ob¬tained contain references and allusions toother COINTELPRO activity.ER: The FBI was spying on us for severalreasons. They were interested in what wewere doing; they thought spying on us wouldlead to information about the Weather Un¬derground; they thought we would leadthem to information about black leaders;and they wanted to intimidate us. to stop usfrom doing solidarity work. Other suits havebeen filed — SDS had one. and there aresuits aimed specifically at Red Squad activi¬ty — but this suit (Clark et al versus theUnited States) is a major suit against theFederal Government. Again, the suit hasseveral levels, and one level is to uncoverthe truth about FBI spying on black revolu¬tionary nationalists, to show they wereframed.CM: How aware was SDS of COINTEL¬PRO? Did vou make these connections in1969°SW: I don't think we realized the extent ofharassment, the fact that many “rightwing” groups who targeted leftists were ac¬tually fronts for COINTELPRO. During theDixon sit-in. for example, there was a “rightwing” group that entered the administra¬tion building and bashed some heads in.When you consider that the University ofChicago spends thousands of dollars on se¬curity each year, and that security officerslet these people into the building they wereguarding, it becomes suspicious. And in thetwo weeks before Dick Flacks was attackedin his office, some spray-paintingmysteriously appeared, with a picture of agunscope. claiming “Flacks you’re next.”And then, after all this. Edward Levi wenton to become Attorney General, which is thesame as directing the FBI.Those interested in learning more aboutClark et al versus the United States, and theCOINTELPRO campaign against the NewLeft and black leaders, can attend a forumat the Blue Gargoyle on Sunday, November18, at 7 pm. The Forum features AfeniShakur. of the National Task Force forCOINTEL PRO Litigation and Research;Chokwe Lumumba. Pontiac 31 defenselawyer; Bill Hampton of the Fred Hamptonlawsuit; and Judith Clark, of the Committeefor the Suit Against Government Miscon¬duct. A $2.50 donation is requested.The forum is especially timely becauseAssata Shakur. a leading black woman rev¬olutionary. escaped from a Clinton, NewJersey prison last Friday,avember 9, 1979 — The Chicago Maroon — 5(SRAEU COFFEEHOUSEDSponsored by Sfudeh+s ftr1 IsraelMaturing RickOinHeLarry Mossand o+kersAtop the Del Prado Hotel53rd & Hyde Park Blvd.Serving the finestCantonese cuisineto discriminatingdiners for over30 years' H i 11 c I ^5 ? 1 S WOOD LA WNPeLfel and Drinks for PurchaseNew General Stork Books are arriving next weekGAME SHELVES arc Burgeon ins*\ o\. Turnabout and (landid** ItK(.OBI) SALK now in progress— $2.85 per disc. $6.75 per box set —Hour-: 0:.‘>0-0:00 M-l 1 2:00-1:.‘$0 Sat. b\nold : ! ■■- -Taking defense money for grantedThe University has a strange relationship withthe federal government. On the one hand, BigBrother provides no end to the angst of ad¬ministrators by attaching such strings as af¬firmative action programs to grant money. On theother hand, several faculty members are glad totake grants for military research without even ask¬ing, or, one supposes, caring, about the ends theirwork might be put to.All of this is said and done in the name of theneutral intellect, in the belief that there is adisinterested guide to truth. The purpose of theUniversity is intellectual, not moral, according toCardinal Newman and our own past presidents.Pure research is concerned with that which is, withdiscovering that which can be discovered, withoutregard to what is right and what is wrong. Whenmoral objections to University policies or researchprojects are raised, these are the responses that aregiven.But subscription to one view, one value, or onelitmus-like system is not a valid answer in politics,economics, or academia. Yes, the Universitydepends on and adheres to the principle ofacademic freedom. But there are other principlesthat with it form the larger context in whichresearch activity takes place — a concern for con¬sequences, a responsibility for one’s actions, and arespect for one’s fellow men and their freedom, areamong them.We have made certain commitments in our enter¬prise here. We profess a tremendous faith in man and his unique position in the world, one so greatthat we celebrate that uniqueness in all that we dohere. Through study, teaching, and discussion weare involved with that which makes man special —his intellect, culture, and passions. When thegovernment asks that we broaden the opportunityfor participation in that enterprise, we can acceptthat request as a salutary one consistent with ourmission.It is when the armed forces and so-called“intelligence” agencies ask us to assist in their ac¬tivities that a conflict arises with our purpose. Forwe are in the business of education here, perhapsthe only true growth industry. We have made moraldecisions here — that it is good to know, to ask, tochallenge — and implicit in those decisions is agreat respect for human life and freedom.Perhaps when the next offer for defense contractscomes to the University, our administrators couldrespond “No thank you. We have helped you tobomb and kill enough people. Ours is ahumanitarian project. Maybe we could help youwith the starvation in Cambodia instead.” And tothose Navy and CIA recruiters, they might say,“We don’t think we can help you. We do educationhere. Although we do not necessarily endorse thepolicies of all those who come here to recruit, wemust take issue with what you do. We are commit¬ted to those values that you have done so much tosubvert at home and abroad.”A.P. Editor: Andrew PatnerGrey City Journal Editor: David MillerManaging Editor: Jaan EliasFeatures Editor: Mark WallachSports Editor: Andy RothmanPhoto Editor: Tim BakerLiterary Review Editors: Richard Kaye and MollyMcQuadeAssociate Editors: David Glockner and Chris IsidoreContributing Editor: Nancy ClevelandSenior Editors: Abbe Fletman and Claudia MagatBusiness Manager: Joel GreenAd Manager : Steve KaszynskiOffice Manager: Leslie WickGraphics: Chris PersansProduction: Jacob Levine and Scott RaulandStaff: Curtis Black, David Blaszkowsky, Doug Braun,Dan Breslau, Jeff Cane, Jeff Davitz, John Dugan, MarkErwin, Wendy Glabman, Jamie Graff, Chris Isidore, JohnKim, Carol Klammer, Greg Mizera, Sherrie Negrea, Dan¬ila Oder, Sharon Pollack, Kathleen Restifo, David Rubin,Allen Sowizral, Adam Spiegel, Howard Suls, Calvin Thrill¬ing, Darrel WuDunn, John Wright, Phoebe Zerwick.• • •The Chicago Maroon is the student newspaper of theUniversity of Chicago, published on Tuesdays and Fri¬days. Editorial and business offices are located on thethird floor of Ida Noyes Hall, 1212 E. 59th St., Chicago.60637. Telephone: 753-3263.We welcome letters and comment. Coorespondenceshould be addressed to the Editor and should be typed andtriple-spaced. Letters must be signed and the writershould indentify his or her connection with the Universityor the community. Names will be withheld at the writer’srequest. All letters become the property of The Maroon.Letters to the EditorGood grief!To the Editor:My most recent meeting with CharlieBrown, while gazing into a mirror, focussedon the next holiday. His last words were,“Good Grief! A Maroon Turkey!” Upon re¬flection, I suppose, he’d rather see than beone.Aaugh!Jonathan Z. SmithDean of the CollegeCIA clarificationTo the Editor:The caption below my picture on the frontpage of The Maroon of Friday, November 2,might suggest that I am somehow involvedin CIA recruitment of personnel on theQuadrangles. May I make it clear that thisis not the case, but with a qualification givenbelow. When a CIA recruiter comes to thiscampus, I have no more knowledge of hisvisit than is made available through the Uni¬versity’s placement office. Such recruitersdo not make it a point to get in touch with in¬dividuals on the campus, so far as I know,and they never have approached me.However, CIA is a major employer of ge¬ographers. This is not strange, since theyare interested in hiring for strategic intelli¬gence research individuals who have a con¬siderable knowledge of individual countriesand regions, and geographers are particu¬larly well equipped to synthesize informa¬tion and put it together in a comprehensivemanner. A number of alumni from this De¬partment are employed by the Agency. Tomy knowledge, they are engaged in re¬search of a largely overt nature, some of theresults of which appear in CIA publicationswhich are available in the University Li¬braries. From time to time, we will receivean inquiry from one of our alumni employedby the Agency as to the availability of per¬sonnel for particular strategic intelligence research jobs. I make this informationavailable to our students, and if they are in¬terested, will send their names and curricu¬la to Washington or suggest that they do so. Ialways make it clear that although most ofwhat they will be doing will be research of anear-academic nature, the line betweenovert and covert ingelligence activities israther fuzzy; and they must be the judge ofwhether or not they wish to become involvedwith the latter.For those interested in what strategic in¬telligence is all about, I suggest looking atSherman Kent’s classic entitled Strategic In¬telligence for American World Policy (Prin¬ceton: Princeton University Press, 1949).Norton GinsburgProfessor and ChairmanDepartment of GeographyWanted:intelligent ideasTo the Editor:As I read some of the articles in this“newspaper” I am often disappointed andsometimes very ashamed. The University ofChicago is one of the most academicallyprestigious and intellectually respected in¬stitutions in the nation. However, as onereads The Maroon, one cannot help but getthe feeling that either this university is fail¬ing in its goal of educating or that certainindividuals attending this school are imper¬vious to both the world around them and tothe ideals of thought and evaluation of infor¬mation held at the University of Chicago. Inpractically every issue there are articles orletters that do not deserve to be printed or ifthey are they should be printed in with thecomics. I do not deny that every person hasa right to hold his own opinion and to voicethat opinion. However, as an importantsource of information and avenue of discus¬sion, a newspaper must accept its responsi¬bility to print only responsible and intelli¬gent arguments.By this time everyone must know to whicharticles I refer. The Spartacus YouthLeague time and again supplies us with ma¬terial that either keeps us laughing tor hours or shaking our heads in disbelief. The sad¬dest part is that the basic principles aroundwhich, I suppose, their group is formed havesome validity. However, because of themanner in which these fanatics convey theirmessage, people rarely take them seriously.By constantly referring to the United Statesas a nation of “bloodthirsty capitalists” and“imperialists” without producing any soundargument to support their claims, the validi¬ty of their original premise is in seriousquestion. Also, the Spartacus Youth Leaguepresents their criticisms as if capitalistcountries were the only ones who act attimes in an imperialistic or dubious man¬ner. The U.S. Naval base in GuantanomoBay is a constant target for the S.Y.L. butthey never seem to mention the Russiantroops in Cuba nor the Cuban troops (whoare Russian supported) in Angola.I am not trying to engage in a “can youtop this’’ argument on imperialism or criti¬cism of certain politico-economic systems.My point is that differing points of view onvital issues are essential to achieve a bal¬ance. Regardless of my disagreement withthe ideas of the S.Y.L., their opposing argu¬ments would perhaps have some value ifthey were stated in an intelligent fashion.Mr. Editor, it is your duty to your readers toinsure that the material printed is of a re¬spectable quality. Groups or individuals, nomatter what their opinion, must be made torealize that what they submit will not beprinted unless it possesses intelligent ideasand sound argument. Who you may ask is todecide what is of printable quality? You.Mr. Editor, that is your job. •Gregory A. BedellStudent in the College full of holes and contradictory implicationsthat I’m surprised it survived transplanta¬tion from his typewriter.In the first place. Remba seems trappedby a sort of referential fallacy. He seems tothink that one can answer the question —What is a rapist? — by reference to a partic¬ular psychology and subculture. This ofcourse flies in the face of the facts, giventhat rape occurs at every socioeconomiclevel of society, and is performed by degen¬erates, criminals of property, plumbers,professors, and philosophy students, and ev¬erybody in between. Remba wants us to ac¬cept the reductionist formulation that rapeis quite simply the product of a sick mind. Ofcourse, we might possibly be interested inthe manifold influences shaping a “dis¬turbed” mind, but this (for Remba at least imight take us out of a hermetically sealedsubculture or subjungle of violence and ickysick people, and into an examination of ourown culture and our own complicity. Ratherthan that, Remba takes us through a tour deforce of philosophic category-making, won¬derfully creating for us an imaginary-glimpse of the rapist:(rape is) ... “perpetrated by thosewho are undoubtably prone to physi¬cal violence and crime in other re¬spects. . .“The rapist does not believe, as thepornographer does, that sexual activi¬ties between consenting adults are inthemselves enjoyable and . . . accept¬able.” (No rapists are married0 Norapists ever happen to be involved inwhat even they would recognize as“healthy” sexual relationships?)Remba’s reductionTo the Editor:After puzzling over Gidon Remba’s “De¬fense of Pornography,” I felt certain thathis characterization of Mr. Wissoker's argu¬ments as “erroneous assumptions and falseanalogies” was an unconscious but acuteact of self description. His lecture (and itdoes read like a moral lecture) is itself so It seems Remba wants to sever the con¬nection between the society and the individ¬ual, at least so far as rape is concerned; therapist must somehow be exception? 1 anddifferent, or, in Remba's formulation, hemust find his primary social context outsideof “sexist mass society.” By this postulate,sexist mass society is of course totally exon¬erated of any complicity in acts of sexual vi¬olence.Turn to Page 15Friday. November 9, 1979 — The Chicago Maroon — 7Toward a human sexuality: a resBy Adrienne WeseleyAn elaborate complex of myths perpetu¬ates sex-oppression in our society. The mostobvious myths (“primary myths”) — thoseof the passivity and masochism “inherent”in female sexuality, for example — create,reinforce, and justify misogyny (the hatredof women) and its ramifications. Porno¬graphy is a “fertile” source of this type ofmyth. This type, however, could not aloneperpetuate sex-oppression. Human beingsOpiniondo not naturally “enjoy” humiliating andbrutalizing other human beings. Some peo¬ple can be so perverted that they will openlyaccept sex-oppression and its equating ofhuman power and cruelty; most, however,must be at least half-blinded before they willaccept an ideology that brutalizes womenand degrades all human beings. It is for thepurpose of this “necessary” blindness thatanother type of myth (the “secondarymyth”) is created: myths that blind us tothe effects of the sex-oppressive ideas wehold and activities in which we share.Mr. Gidon D. Remba has provided anopinion, “In Defense of Pornography”(Nov. 2, Maroon), that demonstrates an ar¬gument founded on an unfortunately typicalarray of the second type of myth: by making“erroneous assumptions and false analo¬gies” about the nature of rape, pornography— indeed, of sexuality itself — by describingcontemporary myths about rape and porno¬graphy, rather than the activities them¬selves, he is able to atomize an intenselypainful, pervasive social problem back intocomfortably nebulous incomprehensibility.The first myth that Mr. Remba puts for¬ward (without any substantiation whatso¬ever) is that of rape as “the product of a dis¬turbed mind”; more specifically,perpetuated by “those deranged individualswho perceive themselves as having been‘hurt’ by a girlfriend or mother, and whotransferred their anger to women as awhole.” Thus Mr. Remba sees rape as per¬manent a social feature as mental illness.However, psychological tests have shownthat at least convicted rapists are notderanged, they do not exhibit “disturbedminds”. In fact, 97 percent of all convictedrapists are determined “normal” by main¬stream psychological tests (Medea andThompson, Against Rape). Almost all ra¬pists do exhibit hostility towards women;most rapists consider sex more enjoyable ifaccompanied by violence. This judgment of talize a woman in order to obtain this “con¬sent”. In Lorenne Clark and Debra Lewis’sstudy of convicted rapists, they discoveredthat most rapists did not believe they weredoing anything wrong, and saw their behav¬ior as no different from that of a normalman. The difference between a rapist and a“normal” man is therefore not the margin-ality of the former to our society’s moralityand health, but rather the willingness of theformer to use socially unacceptable meansof sexual coercion.But Mr. Remba states that “the primarysocial context of the rapist is not sexist masssociety. It is rather that subculture whereviolence, robbery and murder prevail.”This statement, again, is untrue. Theaverage rapist is not some lower-class mad¬man, who drags a woman into a dark alley;mor6 than 50 percent of all rapes are perpe¬trated by men their “victims” know: an ac¬quaintance, a fellow-worker, someone at aparty, a lover’s friend. Mr. Remba’s state¬ment reveais a racism and classism thathave often been used to obscure the real nature of rape. It is a “time-honored” strategyof channelling women’s anger into supportfor other oppressions, to say — it’s theblacks, it’s poor people — so often that thesimple, true answer, “it’s men” is hidden.With such a statement Mr. Remba also im¬plies that black and poor women must sub¬mit to rape as part of their “culture”. Thisemphasis on “violent subcultures” is notonly misleading, it is an ideological out¬rage.The second major myth that Mr. Rembadraws upon is that of rape being primarilycharacterized by an asexual, generalized vi¬olence. If rape were an essentially sexualcrime, he argues, then we could expect“those who are exposed to pornographic pornography in their teens led 80 percent ofrapists to ‘wishing to try the act’ they hadwitnessed . . . Another study ignored by themajority members but mentioned in the mi¬nority report indicated that 39 percent of sexoffenders studied said that ‘pornographyhad something to do with their committingthe sex offense they were convicted of.’ ”(Berger, “Pornography: Is Censorship theAnswer?”).As participation in pornography is corre¬lated to crimes against women, so an accep¬tance of the sexual attitudes of pornographyleads to the condoning of rape. First of allone must recognize that almost all men“generally subscribe to the sexual atti¬tudes” that pornography embodies. Mostmen accept the image of women as sexuallypassive and of men as aggressive, that of a“normal” sexual act as defined more bymale desire than by the female. (Admitted¬ly, it is hard to avoid these myths, we aresocialized into them.) The question follows,then: do most men condone coercive malesexuality — that is, rape? The answer isyes.Our legal system is primarily constructedto protect men from being convicted of rape,rather than to protect women from beingraped. There is still some ambiguity hang¬ing around the legal system over who shouldbe blamed for rape: the rapist or the vic¬tim? The legal system is changing. But notfast enough. The police as well often suc¬cumb to the same prejudices. They, too, arechanging — not fast enough.Male supremacist myths pervade the in¬tellectual structure of culture. How elsecould mainstream psychology hold that ra¬pists are “normal”? This discipline is pre¬pared to defend only the health of men; ra¬pists, then, are “normal” because they donot threaten men. Traditional psychology iscommitted, not to investigating health/ill¬ness in the human psyche, but to equatingthe “male” with “health” — no matter thecost (to women). How many “intellectual”disciplines at this University warp goals in asimilar way?So rape is an inherently sexual crime. Yetfeminists will say, “Rape is not a crime ofpassion, but of violence.” What do we meanby this? Rape is not committed for sexualpleasure, but for the “pleasure” of dominat¬ing and brutalizing a woman. As one con¬victed rapist said, “You don’t want to rapesomeone just for the orgasm. You want tohurt a woman.” (Clark and Lewis, op cit).Mr. Remba tries to take sadism towardswomen and translate it into the destructionof private property. However, proving thatviolence is a primary part of rape does notprove that “sexuality” is secondary. In our culture under social pressures(present from our births on) “sexuality”and violence merge. In pornography and ad¬vertising this merging is considered fash¬ionable; it however, pervades every otheraspect of our lives as well. “Normal” sexu¬ality in our culture includes a wide range offorms of acceptable (male) coercion; eco¬nomic, emotional, verbal-abusive. For ex¬ample, the coercive techniques of “backseatsex” may be found regrettable, but are alsogenerally considered “normal”.This brings in the whole question of: Whatis “violent sex”? Proof is demanded fromthe victim — bruises, blood. The wholemedia image of rape is strongly connectedwith other and external beatings and withmurder. This focus serves to still further ob¬scure the issue. Against this focus we mustassert : rape is violent not because the rapistpulls a knife, not because he beats up thewoman, not because it can end in death, butbecause it is the sexual forcing of a humanbeing. This is the core of violence in rape,and in much of what we consider “normal”sexuality — the woman’s needs, desires, re¬sponse are not considered as important asthe man’s.Feminists, however, state that “rape isnot a crime of passion” for we refuse to con¬fuse passion with domination. We are mov¬ing toward a new, healthy, sexuality. Part ofthis redefinition process is the redefining ofperversion. And so we ask: What is rape?“Rape ... is any sexual intimacy, whetherby direct physical contact or not, that isforced on one person by another.” (Medeaand Thompson, op cit). Our definition thusbroadens to include sexually-threateninggazes, cat-calling, wolf whistles, grabbing,pinching, etc. But it must also broaden to ex¬amine what “force” means in this society. Ifa woman is raised to weakness and submis¬sion, how much force is needed for rape ofany sort? Very little.This expansion also includes a rethinkingof the term “consenting adults,” a term longused to justify all kinds of atrocities, in por¬nographic representations and in our “por-nograhic” lives. We ask: What does a manhave to do to obtain “consent”? Pull a gun, aknife, take a threatening tone of voice? Paymoney? Threaten with academic and/orprofessional losses? Threaten with imagesof personal inadequacy — the woman is“prudish” if she refuses? Or just portraymale-oriented sex as the only “normal” wayfor women to develop physically intimaterelationships? These coercions are used allthe time. Against this background of con¬stant aggression and economic/emotionalinsecurity, what can “consent” mean? Theprocess of redefinition must increase oursensitivity and create a sexuality that will"You don't want to rape someone just for the orgasm.You want to hurt a woman."“normalcy,” therefore, accepts misogynyand the sexual aggression it engenders as a“normal” part of the male psyche. (The fe¬male correlative of misogyny, misandry, isconsidered a disease and is treated as“penis envy” or as a “castration com¬plex”). One does not have to involve com¬plex situations of Oedipus complexes and re¬jections to develop an image of the rapist; inmany ways the rapist is “simply a man”.Mr. Remba also portrays the rapist asstanding outside our moral system. The ra¬pist, he states, does not operate by any “dis-cemable moral standards,” “for he does notbelieve that he needs anyone’s consent forthe skewed and perverse expression of his‘sexuality’ ”. Although some rapists seemto take a direct, open “pleasure” in brutaliz¬ing a woman, most seem to prefer not to seetheir acts as rape. (One rapist apparentlycould not have an orgasm until he hadforced the woman into saying she was enjoy¬ing it; another threatened the woman withmurder after she termed what he had donerape. (Clark and Lewis, Rape: The Price ofCoercive Sexuality). It is apparently as nec¬essary for most rapists to perceive them¬selves as acting on the “consent” of thewoman involved as it is for any man in thissociety. They, however, are willing to bru¬ films and literature, and who generally sub¬scribe to the sexual attitudes which they em¬body, to be especially prone to committingrape, or at least to condoning it.”But this is indeed the case. For example, aman who attempted rape at 17 said the fol¬lowing: “I pulled her back and hit her sever¬al times in the face quite hard, and shestopped resisting and she said, ‘All right,just don’t hurt me.’ And I think when shesaid that... all of a sudden a thought cameinto my head: My God, this is a humanbeing ... It was difficult for me at that timeto even admit that when I was talking to awoman, I was dealing with a human being,because, if you read men’s magazines, youhear about your stereo, your car, your chick...” (Griffin, Rape: The Power of Con¬sciousness).Although the majority of the U S. Com¬mission on Pornography and Obscenity stat¬ed that pornography is not a cause of crimi¬nal conduct, its minority report argued thatcertain commission-sponsored studies wereignored in its deliberations. “Among thesewas a study concluding that pornography in¬creases ‘aggression toward women’; astudy of rapists showing that 55 percent ofthem were ‘excited to sex relations by por¬nography,’ and that ‘peak experiences’ of8 — The Chicago Maroon — Friday, November 9, 1979 What does a man have to do to obtain "consent"? Pull agun, a knife, take a threatening tone of voice? Paymoney? Threaten with academic and/or professionallosses? Threaten with images of personal inadequacy —the woman is "prudish" if she refuses? Or just portraymale-oriented sex as the only "normal" way for womento develop physically intimate relationships?Bsponse to pornography’s defenserespond to and “revolutionize” both femaleand male sexual needs.Both pornography and rape are based onmisogyny. Pornography is produced by menfor men. What is important to the produc¬ers/directors/authors/editors is the materi¬al which will turn on the man. Women arepaid to perform male fantasies — that is,their economic and emotional vulnerabilityis exploited in order to depict myths fulfill¬ing a socially perverted male sexuality. Theword, “pornography”, stems from theGreek, meaning “the depiction of harlots”— and thus stems also from a form of “ac¬ceptable” — economic and emotional — co¬ercion: prostitution.Pornography is not the source of sex-op- they want, “whether it (!!) be material ob¬jects in a store window, or women.” Thisequivalence must be seen as invalid. Hisreadiness to accept it depends on what weconsider rape to be: if it is the violation of awoman’s right to physical/sexual self-deter¬mination it is a unique and incomparablecrime, and deserves special attention, as tohow it came to be invented in the first place,(although it does have correlative crimes —the denial of abortion, for example); if rapeis considered, however, an issue over whichmen do and should have control, the viola¬tion of a basic human right is transformedinto the lessening of a woman’s worth tomen, and there is seen a direct, easy equiva¬lence between rape and theft. Mr. Rembasees rape in such a light, for in mocking ourEach of us must begin in her/his own mind to disen¬tangle sex and domination. It is not enough to repress(and/or punish oneself for) their continuing confusion inoneself. We must each learn a kindness towardsourselves...pression. It rather supports, reinforces andjustifies a sex-oppressive ideology, which isused in turn to degrade and terrorizewomen. Pornography is then a type of politi¬cal propaganda which passes on the mes¬sage of the extent to which perverted malebehavior will be accepted and even deemeddesirable.Behind these secondary myths which ob¬scure the extent of sexual coercion lie fun¬damental myths that support such oppres¬sion. One of these “primary myths” is theequivalence of women and property. Our ac¬ceptance of Mr. Remba’s argument dependson our ability to see “rape” subsumed under“general violence”, especially violenceagainst property. He talks of those “subcul¬tural individuals” who take “what” (!!)Eat it! Continued from Page 3 representation of the rapist as “more spe¬ciously, a man” and by adding “like your¬self or myself” he reveals which portion ofhis readership he is addressing, and whichhe ignores. And thus the old, pervertingmyths linger on.Mr. Remba reveals his commitment sole¬ly to the male point of view in his argumentthat the objectification of women is“healthy”. Could it be, we hoped, readingthe article, that Mr. Remba has just con¬fused the joyful integration of the intenselyphysical into the emotionally sexual with“objectification”? But no, such healthy sex¬uality is not indicated. He states: “there isnothing intrinsically wrong with such a one¬sided (objectifying) relationship, just as it isnot ‘wrong’ to choose to savor the physical texture of a painting or sculpture, as an artobject, to the detriment of its color andstyle.” He thus equates the objectification ofan object with the objectification of a humanbeing. It’s incredible. Not only this, but heassumes that the only significant costs to ob¬jectification lie with the “objectifier”, inhow such a perceptual process limits theman who engages in it. He does not even in¬vestigate possible costs to the “objectified”— the cost to a woman, for example, ofnever being sure that a man at a given mo¬ment considers her a human being and notan “art” object.A “secondary” myth through which Mr.Remba reveals his male-oriented bias is theassumption that Playgirl is to women whatPlayboy is to men. Playgirl, however, is notthe development of a correlative, “female”,pornography; it is an extension of old per¬verted male myths. It is just another (male-oriented) attempt to convince the publicthat there are no alternatives to oppression,objectifying sexuality — that if women hadpower — as women get power — they wouldand they will want from men what men sup¬posedly want from women: certain mechan¬ically physical performances and a sense oftheir own power. In this denying of alterna¬tives, in this extension of male perversions,the sexual imagination continues to be crip¬pled and warped.Finally, by rejecting and mocking femin¬ism, Mr. Remba blinds himself to the pos¬sibilities of real sexual change. For he dis¬misses the anti-pornography, feministmovement as reactionary. This dimissalstems from a traditional male fear thatwomen just want to constrict men, andwould if they had the power.First of all, Women Against Pornographydoes not advocate censorship; it rather pro¬poses education and awareness. We do un¬derstand, however, the anti-pornographymovement’s appeal to conservatives. Weacknowledge that the roots of American fe¬minism are entwined with the fight for chas¬tity and abstinence, and against sex. Someearly feminists could not see beyond the per¬verted image of sexuality imposed by this society; on the basis of this limited percep¬tion they equated sexuality with exploitationand fought against it.But the feminist goal is not the constric¬tion of men — it is the liberation of humanbeings. We know that we can move beyondtraditional cripplings and sexuality — wehave already begun such a movement. Be¬cause we understand the fears that a misin¬terpretation of “sexual liberation” engen¬ders, we support traditional, still fearfulpeople, and encourage them through oursupport to understand liberation and fightfor it. This does not imply, however, that wewill ever give up any of our struggles — forabortion, against heterosex ism, to namejust two —. We are, however, committed toteach that sex is not inherently exploitative,that it is in fact the energy of newly creativesexuality that will be one of the strongestforces to burst old oppressive structures andto construct the new world.We all live in a pornographic society. Fe¬minists do not argue from a position of puri¬ty; rather we speak from our commitmentto fight our personal and political waysthrough the manifestation of pornography inour societies and ourselves.For sexuality poses a personal threat, the“threat” of intimacy. Sexuality may consti¬tute the most vulnerable of all humanspheres. It is in such a sphere that we needprotection. But do we protect ourselves bylearning to love and understand ourselves,or do we do so by evading responsibility — toourselves, to others, and to the creativeproblem itself — by rigidifying the processand dominating/brutalizing others — inshort, by pretending that we can force peo¬ple to fill our needs?The process of working through sexist,pornographic society is a laborious one..There is, of course, obvious “external”, po¬litical work to be done. The personal effort,however, may require more energy. Each ofus must begin in her/his own mind to disen¬tangle sex and domination. It is not enoughto repress (and/or punish oneself for > theircontinuing confusion in oneself. We musteach learn a kindness toward ourselves, akindness that will give us the strength towork through fantasies of power differen¬tials. We must learn what our fundamentalsexual needs are, to learn how sexuality canreestablish ties between people rather thansever them.This is not the old Christian notion of cut¬ting off the offending part; we do not cry“Down with smut! ” We have more trust andfaith in human nature than that. We willtransform sexuality so that it creates eroti¬ca, not pornography; we must work to reha¬bilitate, liberate — in short, to humanize —sexuality. For we believe that to makehuman is to liberate. And so we struggletoward a future in which sexuality is ram¬pant; — and the devastating inventions ofrape and pornography are beyond all of ourfinally human — free — imaginations.Adrienne Weseley is a graduate student incomparative literature. She was assisted inthe preparation of this piece by severalfriends.occurred to us we were going on a real plane trip. We pro¬ceeded on to the gate and waited for the plane, en routefrom Detroit, to arrive. When it came we walked out andup the steps tto the freshly painted DC-9, found a windowseat, and tried to get some sleep.One hour and ten minutes later we touched down atKansas City International Airport, which neither handlesinternational flights, nor is located in Kansas City. Wefound a downtown bus and the trail to Bryant’s grew hot¬ter. After getting off the bus we found a map, and began ahike to Bryant’s, at 18th and Brooklyn, walking alongsidethe American Royal Parade, past the Main Street Mor¬gue, and along 18th St. Realizing Brooklyn was fartherthan we thought, and the scenery not too worthwhile, weflagged down another bus, drove two stops past Brooklyn,and got off. Backtracking we noticed the rear of a houselittered with empty pop bottles, stray cats and jugs.Bryant’s.Located next to several vacant lots, Bryant’s has palegreen siding, a sign, which wasn’t lit up, but would havesaid “Bryants” and an unwashed picture window. Westepped into the white formica dining room, glanced at thefoursome drinking a pitcher of beer. Regrouping oursenses, we strode up to the counter.“What can I do for you, my man,” said the counter¬man.“Three orders of ribs, please,” we said. “No ribs until 11.”Yikes! We glanced at the time: 10:30 am. which isusually when our alarm clock goes off for the first time.Still, we were starving.“You can get some beef or ham,” suggested the coun¬terman.We ordered two barbecued ham sandwiches and somefries, walked over to the pop machine for Dr. Pepper, andbegan to eat like pigs. The sandwiches were delicious andseemed to be whole hams between four pieces of bread, aswere the fries, which were made from fresh potatoes andfried in pure lard. We were just cleaning our plates as theribs became ready for consumption. Two slabs of ribs, twomore orders of fries, two handfuls of burnt beef brisketedges and several pops later, we began to consider ourtake out order. We picked up several more slabs of ribsand handfuls of burnt edges for the more unfortunate peo¬ple still in Chicago. We also bought enough barbecuesauce to get us through the coming winter. There wereonly a half dozen people in Bryant’s when we came, but aline that catalogued all humanity stretched past the frontdoor as we left.After we left Bryant’s we decided to find a motel roomand get some sleep before making our dinner plans. Wedozed off dreaming of a Winstead’s double cheese¬burger.After dinner (a few double cheeseburgers, several frosty malts, and more fries) we strolled through thenearby shopping and entertainment area, called thePlaza. Originally we had been turned off by the descrip¬tion of the place: “noted for its Spanish and Moorish ar¬chitecture.” Our first response had been “No it’s not” butout opinion changed when we began walking through it.The Spanish and Moorish architecture was noted.We considered our return trip home. It seemed to us itwould be easier to make the 37 cent flight back to Chicagothan it was to come down to Kansas City. Just to be sure,we counted up our money, in case we had to catch a real,full fare flight back. Among our expenses; flight down. 37cents. Bus from airport, $4. Arthur Bryant’s, $4 per slap ofribs, $3.25 for a ham sandwich. Winstead’s double chee¬seburger, $1.85. We decided that the trip down to KansasCity set us back about as much as a trip to a North Siderestaurant.We arrived back at the airport at noon for the 5:15 flight,about twentieth in line. We were on the 37 cent specialback to Chicago a few minutes after five, and the planearrived at Midway ahead of schedule We walked over tothe comer of 55th and Cicero to catch the 55 bus. When itcame, we dropped 40 cents in the box, and sat down, feel¬ing pretty smart.“That’s 45 cents, sir,” said the bus driver.“Huh?”“New fares.”Friday, November 9, 1979 — The Chicago Maroon — 13TToward a human sexuality: a resBy Adrienne WeseleyAn elaborate complex of myths perpetu¬ates sex-oppression in our society. The mostobvious myths (“primary myths”) — thoseof the passivity and masochism “inherent”in female sexuality, for example — create,reinforce, and justify misogyny (the hatredof women) and its ramifications. Porno¬graphy is a “fertile” source of this type ofmyth. This type, however, could not aloneperpetuate sex-oppression. Human beingsOpiniondo not naturally “enjoy” humiliating andbrutalizing other human beings. Some peo¬ple can be so perverted that they will openlyaccept sex-oppression and its equating ofhuman power and cruelty; most, however,must be at least half-blinded before they willaccept an ideology that brutalizes womenand degrades all human beings. It is for thepurpose of this “necessary” blindness thatanother type of myth (the “secondarymyth”) is created: myths that blind us tothe effects of the sex-oppressive ideas wehold and activities in which we share.Mr, Gidon D. Remba has provided anopinion, “In Defense of Pornography”(Nov. 2, Maroon), that demonstrates an ar¬gument founded on an unfortunately typicalarray of the second type of myth: by making“erroneous assumptions and false analo¬gies” about the nature of rape, pornography— indeed, of sexuality itself — by describingcontemporary myths about rape and porno¬graphy, rather than the activities them¬selves, he is able to atomize an intenselypainful, pervasive social problem back intocomfortably nebulous incomprehensibility.The first myth that Mr. Remba puts for¬ward (without any substantiation whatso¬ever) is that of rape as “the product of a dis¬turbed mind”; more specifically,perpetuated by “those deranged individualswho perceive themselves as having been‘hurt’ by a girlfriend or mother, and whotransferred their anger to women as awhole.” Thus Mr. Remba sees rape as per¬manent a social feature as mental illness.However, psychological tests have shownthat at least convicted rapists are notderanged, they do not exhibit “disturbedminds”. In fact, 97 percent of all convictedrapists are determined “normal” by main¬stream psychological tests (Medea andThompson, Against Rape). Almost all ra¬pists do exhibit hostility towards women;most rapists consider sex more enjoyable ifaccompanied by violence. This judgment of“normalcy,” therefore, accepts misogynyand the sexual aggression it engenders as a“normal” part of the male psyche. (The fe¬male correlative of misogyny, misandry, isconsidered a disease and is treated as“penis envy” or as a “castration com¬plex”). One does not have to involve com¬plex situations of Oedipus complexes and re¬jections to develop an image of the rapist; inmany ways the rapist is “simply a man”.Mr. Remba also portrays the rapist asstanding outside our moral system. The ra¬pist, he states, does not operate by any “dis-cemable moral standards,” “for he does notbelieve that he needs anyone’s consent forthe skewed and perverse expression of his‘sexuality’ ”. Although some rapists seemto take a direct, open “pleasure” in brutaliz¬ing a woman, most seem to prefer not to seetheir acts as rape. (One rapist apparentlycould not have an orgasm until he hadforced the woman into saying she was enjoy¬ing it; another threatened the woman withmurder after she termed what he had donerape. (Clark and Lewis, Rape: The Price ofCoercive Sexuality). It is apparently as nec¬essary for most rapists to perceive them¬selves as acting on the “consent” of thewoman involved as it is for any man in thissociety. They, however, are willing to bru¬ talize a woman in order to obtain this “con¬sent”. In Lorenne Clark and Debra Lewis’sstudy of convicted rapists, they discoveredthat most rapists did not believe they weredoing anything wrong, and saw their behav¬ior as no different from that of a normalman. The difference between a rapist and a“normal” man is therefore not the margin-ality of the former to our society’s moralityand health, but rather the willingness of theformer to use socially unacceptable meansof sexual coercion.But Mr. Remba states that “the primarysocial context of the rapist is not sexist masssociety. It is rather that subculture whereviolence, robbery and murder prevail.”This statement, again, is untrue. Theaverage rapist is not some lower-class mad¬man, who drags a woman into a dark alley;more than 50 percent of all rapes are perpe¬trated by men their “victims” know: an ac¬quaintance, a fellow-worker, someone at aparty, a lover’s friend. Mr. Remba’s state¬ment reveals a racism and classism thathave often been used to obscure the real na¬ture of rape. It is a “time-honored” strategyof channelling women’s anger into supportfor other oppressions, to say — it’s theblacks, it’s poor people — so often that thesimple, true answer, “it’s men” is hidden.With such a statement Mr. Remba also im¬plies that black and poor women must sub¬mit to rape as part of their “culture”. Thisemphasis on “violent subcultures” is notonly misleading, it is an ideological out¬rage.The second major myth that Mr. Rembadraws upon is that of rape being primarilycharacterized by an asexual, generalized vi¬olence. If rape were an essentially sexualcrime, he argues, then we could expect“those who are exposed to pornographicfilms and literature, and who generally sub¬scribe to the sexual attitudes which they em¬body, to be especially prone to committingrape, or at least to condoning it.”But this is indeed the case. For example, aman who attempted rape at 17 said the fol¬lowing: “I pulled her back and hit her sever¬al times in the face quite hard, and shestopped resisting and she said, ‘All right,just don’t hurt me.’ And I think when shesaid that... all of a sudden a thought cameinto my head: My God, this is a humanbeing ... It was difficult for me at that timeto even admit that when I was talking to awoman, I was dealing with a human being,because, if you read men’s magazines, youhear about your stereo, your car, your chick. . .” (Griffin, Rape: The Power of Con¬sciousness).Although the majority of the U.S. Com¬mission on Pornography and Obscenity stat¬ed that pornography is not a cause of crimi¬nal conduct, its minority report argued thatcertain commission-sponsored studies wereignored in its deliberations. “Among thesewas a study concluding that pornography in¬creases ‘aggression toward women’; astudy of rapists showing that 55 percent ofthem were ‘excited to sex relations by por¬nography,’ and that ‘peak experiences’ of pornography in their teens led 80 percent ofrapists to ‘wishing to try the act’ they hadwitnessed . . . Another study ignored by themajority members but mentioned in the mi¬nority report indicated that 39 percent of sexoffenders studied said that ‘pornographyhad something to do with their committingthe sex offense they were convicted of.’ ”(Berger, “Pornography: Is Censorship theAnswer?”).As participation in pornography is corre¬lated to crimes against women, so an accep¬tance of the sexual attitudes of pornographyleads to the condoning of rape. First of allone must recognize that almost all men“generally subscribe to the sexual atti¬tudes” that pornography embodies. Mostmen accept the image of women as sexuallypassive and of men as aggressive, that of a“normal” sexual act as defined more bymale desire than by the female. (Admitted¬ly, it is hard to avoid these myths, we aresocialized into them.) The question follows,then: do most men condone coercive malesexuality — that is, rape? The answer isyes.Our legal system is primarily constructedto protect men from being convicted of rape,rather than to protect women from beingraped. There is still some ambiguity hang¬ing around the legal system over who shouldbe blamed for rape: the rapist or the vic¬tim? The legal system is changing. But notfast enough. The police as well often suc¬cumb to the same prejudices. They, too, arechanging — not fast enough.Male supremacist myths pervade the in¬tellectual structure of culture. How elsecould mainstream psychology hold that ra¬pists are “normal”? This discipline is pre¬pared to defend only the health of men; ra¬pists, then, are “normal” because they donot threaten men. Traditional psychology iscommitted, not to investigating health/ill¬ness in the human psyche, but to equatingthe “male” with “health” — no matter thecost (to women). How many “intellectual”disciplines at this University warp goals in asimilar way?So rape is an inherently sexual crime. Yetfeminists will say, “Rape is not a crime ofpassion, but of violence.” What do we meanby this? Rape is not committed for sexualpleasure, but for the “pleasure” of dominat¬ing and brutalizing a woman. As one con¬victed rapist said, “You don’t want to rapesomeone just for the orgasm. You want tohurt a woman.” (Clark and Lewis, op cit).Mr. Remba tries to take sadism towardswomen and translate it into the destructionof private property. However, proving thatviolence is a primary part of rape does notprove that “sexuality” is secondary. In our culture under social pressures(present from our births on) “sexuality”and violence merge. In pornography and ad¬vertising this merging is considered fash¬ionable; it however, pervades every otheraspect of our lives as well. “Normal” sexu¬ality in our culture includes a wide range offorms of acceptable (male) coercion; eco¬nomic, emotional, verbal-abusive. For ex¬ample, the coercive techniques of “backseatsex” may be found regrettable, but are alsogenerally considered “normal”.This brings in the whole question of: Whatis “violent sex”? Proof is demanded fromthe victim — bruises, blood. The wholemedia image of rape is strongly connectedwith other and external beatings and withmurder. This focus serves to still further ob¬scure the issue. Against this focus we mustassert : rape is violent not because the rapistpulls a knife, not because he beats up thewoman, not because it can end in death, butbecause it is the sexual forcing of a humanbeing. This is the core of violence in rape,and in much of what we consider “normal”sexuality — the woman’s needs, desires, re¬sponse are not considered as important asthe man’s.Feminists, however, state that “rape isnot a crime of passion” for we refuse to con¬fuse passion with domination. We are mov¬ing toward a new, healthy, sexuality. Part ofthis redefinition process is the redefining ofperversion. And so we ask: What is rape?“Rape ... is any sexual intimacy, whetherby direct physical contact or not, that isforced on one person by another.” (Medeaand Thompson, op cit). Our definition thusbroadens to include sexually-threateninggazes, cat-calling, wolf whistles, grabbing,pinching, etc. But it must also broaden to ex¬amine what “force” means in this society. Ifa woman is raised to weakness and submis¬sion, how much force is needed for rape ofany sort? Very little.This expansion also includes a rethinkingof the term “consenting adults,” a term longused to justify all kinds of atrocities, in por¬nographic representations and in our “por-nograhic” lives. We ask: What does a manhave to do to obtain “consent”? Pull a gun, aknife, take a threatening tone of voice? Paymoney? Threaten with academic and/orprofessional losses? Threaten with imagesof personal inadequacy — the woman is“prudish” if she refuses? Or just portraymale-oriented sex as the only “normal” wayfor women to develop physically intimaterelationships? These coercions are used allthe time. Against this background of con¬stant aggression and economic/emotionalinsecurity, what can “consent” mean? Theprocess of redefinition must increase oursensitivity and create a sexuality that will8 — The Chicago Maroon — Friday, November 9, 1979"You don't want to rape someone just for the orgasm.You want to hurt a woman." What does a man have to do to obtain "consent"? Pull agun, a knife, take a threatening tone of voice? Paymoney? Threaten with academic and/or professionallosses? Threaten with images of personal inadequacy —the woman is "prudish" if she refuses? Or just portraymale-oriented sex as the only "normal" way for womento develop physically intimate relationships?■ 1 ■■ 1 II I II II Itthe grey city journalBarnett Newman asmaster draughtsmanby Danny SchulmanThe art of drawing is superficially seenas happily escorting the major forms ofpainting, sculpture and architecturedown through history. Artists anddrawing connossieurs think otherwise.The history of the graphic arts anddrawing in particular is both complexand romantically mystical in itsrelationship to the "higher” arts and tothe artists themselves.More than the major art forms,drawing links artists from differenthistorical and stylistic periods. Cultureevolves and, correspondingly, therelationship of the artist to his culturechanges. But artists are still artists andtheir drawings are still their mostintimate, personal ground. Because of thedirectness and immediacy of touch,simple tools, and small scale, the artist'spersonality is succinctly projected intothe work. This intimacy is the commonground for all artists.This is not to say that artists' uses ofdrawing is unchangeable and constantunder all circumstances. The role ofdrawing does change, but itscharacteristic of "private property" ofthe artist does not. We begin to seedrawing as an independent activity in thelater Middle Ages. Artists gathered"Untitled," 1960"Untitled," together their drawings, marked byheavy, deliberate use of outline, in abound volume or "Album." The purposeof the Album was a reference guide forfuture artists on how to draw certainobjects in the clearest method: a how-tobook.However, during the Renaissance theartist considered himself an individual; acreator, not a mere cataloguer. Thehighly worked-out, messy drawings ofLeonardo are personal pages ofinspiration and invention that precede theact of painting. They are his ideas in theprocess of being resolved to a certainend. Raphael hired an engraver to copyhis images, or "ideas," so that artists inother parts of Europe could use them toaid in their own compositions. Artists andconnoisseurs began to buy and collectthese "ideas" and cherished them assuch. Durer, Rembrandt, Goya, andPicasso share in Leonardo's conceptionof drawing as a tool for invention.Barnett Newman, who died in 1970,however, is a modern artist. Hispaintings are vastly different from theworks of any of the artists mentionedabove. His drawings, then, become animmensely interesting topic. Do hisworks on paper break with Renaissancetradition? And what is Newman'sattitude toward his drawings? Theexhibition at the Museum ofContemporary Art seeks the answers tothese questions.Each of Newman's drawings, whetherearly or late, has a curiously "finished"quality about them. The reason for thefinished and decidedly untentativeness ofthe work lies in Newman's view ofmodernity. As he once stated, his workson paper are not preparatory to any ofhis paintings in particular. They are apart of a quest for subject matter — thisis what Newman was concerned with.One drawing logically follows another ina search for an irreducible but variableimage. As noted in the catalogue,Newman had several spurts of drawingproduction which came before periods ofprodigous work in paint. The drawingsembodied the search for the image thatthe paintings exploited.The first drawings of 1944 are in brightcrayon colors. The biomorphic shapesare reminiscent of the work of his oldercolleagues, Gorky and Gottlieb. In 1945an increased use of black is noticeable.The background merges with the "Untitled (The Break)," 1946foreground, space and objects areflattened together. It is after only fourwatercolors with a distinct emphasis onthe vertical that Newman takes uppermanently the wet media of brush andink.The next two drawings are perhapsself-portraits that set up new groundworkin black and white. Newman said that theartist always goes to black for new ideas,invention. In the following six drawingsthere is a visible gain in brush virtuosity.The drawing reproduced is the last of thisseries and displays a free spiritedconfidence. After this drawing Newmanreduces the shapes of his imagerydrastically to the "zip" and "beam"forms he will retain and make variationin for the rest of his life. A forceful, earlyexample of the beam form is alsoreproduced. The brushwork isastonishingly beautiful.In the drawings of i960, his secondspurt of large drawing production, one isnot surprised to see the same zip andbeam motifs, however, the brush work isremarkable in its extreme sensitivity andexpressiveness. Some of the drawings arereminiscent of the atmospheric resultsachieved by Seurat in his charcoaldrawings. However, there are strongexpressionistic flourishes in theNewmans that are incredibly movingwhen cbmpared to Seurat's cool,technically controlled approach.Newman's drawings are more closelybound together as a life's work than anybody of drawings that I've seen. After ashort, but intense, period of creation hefound the imagery he would keep until hedied. His motif is not simple; it accepts "Untitled," 1945| and absorbs much variation and canembody many ideas. His simple, modernmotif takes on a huge load of; responsibility for content and the; drawings reveal this.Newman's life-long opus of drawingscan be seen as analagous to a singledrawing by Leonardo taken apart andspread out over eighty sheets. Leonardooften covered the first image he put on apage by many more layers of drawing.; The process was open ended: one imageI inspired another until Leonardo became! satisfied with the final, divine mess,j Newman's drawings never seem toapproach an end. Each one is a divinity.Obviously I'm knocked out by the show.I It runs until January 6.Sit-com improv/comedy of no contentby Karen HornickJohn Monteith and Suzanne Rand havereceived better and wider press than most newcomedians (with the obvious exception of Morkfrom Ork, Arts and Fun-type attacks on hisoriginality and integrity notwithstanding).They have not, however, been on TV much (ifat all), so last Friday's Mandel Hall perfor¬mance provided an opportunity to test thevalidity of their New York critics' lavishpraise.Monteith and Rand are, it turned out, suchable practitioners of what they label “im¬provised and otherwise comedy" that they seta new standard: a standard they themselvesmay not be able to maintain, for already theirgrasp exceeds their reach.By “grasp" I mean talent, mastery of craft.Between them, they have plenty of both, thoughlast Friday's performance suggested Rand hasthe greater portion. She is sharp-tongued andexcessively enthusiastic, a natural mime.Rand takes advantage of a flair for physicalcomedy that few comediennes, but many come¬dians, have chosen or have been permitted toexhibit. Playing frumpy patron in a “MakeYour Own Pornography" sketch to Monteith'sinflatable mannekin, the angular and gracefulRand becomes curvy and awkward withoutprop or costume change. The gymnastic pro¬wess she displays in such scenes indicates that,as spontaneous as Monteith and Rand manage to be, professionalism and training are essential to their act.Monteith's comedy, naturally, is not that dif¬ferent from Rand's. He is more laid-back, moresubtle — though, if he shared a stage withanyone but Rand, this description would notcome to mind. More self-conscious and hesi¬tant, Monteith seems more aware than Rand ofthe risks a comedian takes. He thus makes adistinct appeal; such hesitancy (similar to thatof Mike Nichols — to whom he is inevitablycompared, as Rand is compared to ElaineMay) is an asset in engaging the sympathies ofhis audience. Nonetheless only the alphabetmay explain why Monteith gets top billing.Monteith and Rand share an exquisite stage-sense and ever-surprising, if diverging, wits.They know each other, and therefore performtogether, very well. Part of their show consistsof rehearsed and, by now, classic blackouts andskits. But the rest, the more interesting portion, is devised on the spot. Improv has neverlooked more finished than Monteith and Rand's— few scenes on Friday lasted longer than theyshould have, and not one ended without an ade¬quate punch line.Monteith and Rand are really funny, whichleads to the reaching business of the argument.The criticism that follows is directed not somuch at Monteith and Rand as they are now,but at what they are almost obliged to become.Their problem lies in their material: theyhaven't yet enough of it and what they've got isof questionable substance. It may just be the fault of their critics, butMonteith and Rand did not even try to performone rehearsed skit it hasn’t been possible toread about since they opened on Broadway lastwinter. In spite of loud curtain calls, they re¬fused an encore — for lack of material. Theymight have improvised again, but had closedwith an improvised scene and seemed unwill¬ing to dare that gang plank a second time.A greater repertoire will probably come toMonteith and Rand with time. It will be moredifficult for them to overcome a more Sferiousproblem: slightness. They take the one big riskof going before an audience and trying to makeit laugh, but they avoid, given their talent, alarger one. They do not challenge any force orpower that could challenge them back, or thatwould bring them disfavor from a large public.Perhaps there are too few taboos left for come¬dians to attack. In interview, however, Randherself implied this is not the case: “I thinkthese days people just want to laugh. . . Somany uglies are happening anyway they'drather be entertained than have to react, 'Ohyeah, wow, heavy.' “Monteith and Rand parody — ridicule certainlifestyles and manners — but do not satirize —expose and reduce, through humor, what Randcals “the uglis." For certain tastes, then,Monteith and Rand have too little bite; theirmaterial has too little significance. Few dislikenonsense, empty-headed comedy, andeveryone needs to escape at times. ButMonteith and Rand are sharp enough to deal with weightier things, and work in an art formideally suited to satire. They strike an ir¬reverent pose that leads us to expect — ir¬reverence. We are frustrated when it isn'tdelivered.Sometimes social commentary does slip intotheir work — but through the back door, whenthey aren't looking. Their subject is usually aparticular social group — aging Woodstockers— and the things that popularly characterizethis group: drugs and sex. Because they don'tseem to recognize their own powers of articula¬tion, they end up saying things they don't reallymean:In one scene, Monteith, the husband, comesdownstairs from the kids. Rand, the wife,hands him a joint. They speak in Eastern,pseudo-intellectual, drugged-out voices aboutthe things hippies, ten years after Woodstock,talk about. Rand has run into an old friend atthe supermarket who is no longer “Crystal"but “Chris" and wears, Rand says, a“disgusting silver fox fur coat down to there."“If you don't eat it, you can't wear it," Randencourages Monteith to say, and fetches some"munthies" from the kitchen. “This is good,what is it?" he asks. “Chinchilla crepes," Randanswers, and fades into the familiar tirade ofthe housewife begging her husband to buy her afur. This is hip, and quite funny, but reassertsstereotypes the generation they parody had in¬telligently discarded. In such skits, Monteithand Rand are not apolitical, they are —undeliberately, I think — regressive."Pornography is Violence Against Women"On Tuesday, October 30, Women's Union and the UniversityFeminists co-sponsored a slide show entitled "Porngraphy is Vi¬olence Against Women," presented by Dana Lobeli of WomenAgainst Pornography in New York. Before the show, Dana wasinterviewed by Curtis Black and Sharon Pollack for WHPK andshared a pot-luck dinner with a group of women; the following isone woman's reaction to the event.by Rebecca LillianDinner was lovely: delicious food, wine, music and great con¬versation. We talked about how prevalent violence againstwomen is, on many levels, and how each of us tries to fight it. Wetalked about women's music, and how rent prices are going up;about how marvelous the food was and how nice pot-lucks are.One woman took photos as we all joked around and made funnyfaces and kept reminding ourselves to hurry and go prepare forthe forum.As we walked together to Ida Noyes, I felt the essence of theslogan, "The personal is political." At that moment, I wasn'tthinking about what I was about to see. I just felt strong andhappy and comfortable.Suddenly I was staring at a picture of a woman whose legs, inblack stockings and high heels, were forced open by a bizarretool resembling a step ladder. Her legs were tied to that thing inseveral places by heavy cord, and her arms were chained aboveher head. Her torso was tightly strapped into pieces of blackleather, and she was gagged with a red rubber ball.The next slide was of a woman, naked except for the high heelsthat I came to recognize as pornography's symbols that assureus that violence against women is “chic." The woman waschained to a crucifix and covered with red slash marks. Herhead was tilted back in feigned ecstacy.Both of those pictures were from hard-core bondage magazines, with headlines like “Black bitches bound and gagged andloving it!" and covers that show women smiling while beinaraped. But the next slide was "just" of a record album cover:Ohio Players' Pleasures, featuring a nude woman in chains. Andthe slide after that was “only" taken from the pages of VogueThe photograph, by distinguished fashion photographer RichardAvedon, showed a couple wearing unisex jumpsuits. The manwas punching the woman and throwing her to the ground; theaccompaning copy read, “Honeymoon couple having their firsttiff."In the U.S. alone, two million wives a year are battered bytheir husbands; one of every three women will be raped in herlifetime; 39 per cent of the rapists are acting out scenes fromsome sort of pornography they'd seen; a woman is beaten every18 seconds. But in real life, battered women rarely wear glamorous jump suits or fishnet stockings. They do not “get off" onviolence. Violent acts leave them bloody and scared and furious.Pornography leaves me scared and furious.Pornography is rape.As Dana Lobell told us in her introduction, pornography actually has little to do with sex, and everything to do with domi¬nance and power. Pornographers do not portray consentingadults giving and receiving mutual pleasure. Men rarely appearin pornographic material, and when they do, it is to commit violent acts against women and children. Like raping young girls2 — the grey city journal, Friday, November 9, 1979 Dana Lobell shows slides; Stephanie Browner rolls up hersleevesand forcing them to suck their penises, or pretending that littlegirls are the aggressors by making them remove the men'spants.One quarter of the rape victims in this country are undertwelve years old. One quarter of all female children in the U.S.are sexually abused. Pornography validates child molestation;it gives the illusion that millions of compliant young childrenawait seduction. But girls and boys are not waiting to be seduced. When they are molested, it scars them for life.I recalled a twelve year old mentally handicapped girl whowas raped by a neighbor who knew she was “a retard." Helaughingly denied her accusations, and no one believed themuntil she was discovered to be pregnant — much too late to havean abortion. I remembered this as I looked at a slide of an articlefrom Slam, a “humor" magazine aimed at adolescent boys. Itwas titled “Good Sex with Retarded Girls," and it told boys tobehave just as this young woman's neighbor had: “It's fun torape retarded girls, and it's OK — nobody will believe their testimonies."Siam also tells its young readers about a “sure cure for frigidity." They should fantasize that they are big, strong constructionmen, forcing a jackhammer between the legs of a nude womanwho is willingly spreading them. That she is willing is crucial tothe fantasy, for pornographers perpetuate — and capitalizeupon — the notion that women enjoy being raped and mutilated.An article in a bondage magazine reminds readers to “ensurethat the cords are strong and the knots are tight, because it is from these stimuli that she will achieve orgasm . . . and onlyyou, her master can do this to her ..."The idea that women love to be dominated is transferred toimages of self-mutilation. There are magazines that specializein picture bloody, mutilated women, printing dozens of pictureslike the one that I saw. It was the close-up of a woman, boundand gagged but for one free hand, taking a butcher knife to herown genitals, Chic, a “normal" soft-core magazine, featured anarticle called “Columbine Cuts Up."Drawings of Columbine showed her smiling sickly as shepoked at her vagina with a knife and snipped at her labia withscissors.Chic is sold at newstands and grocery and drug stores everywhere; a fact that indicates the growing influence of violent pornography in mainstream American media. More and more “respectabte" people are considering “sexy violence" to bebeautiful. White Women, an expensive coffe-table book by re¬nowned photographer Helmut Newman, is filled with this type of“beauty." One photograph is of the backs of two women, supposedly lesbians, wearing nothing but leather garter belts and highheels. The background is a fancy bathroom beautifully done inArt Deco. One woman is pushing the other's head into the toilet.Critics hail Newman's work as “high art." In doing so, artistsand critics alike perpetuate yet another popular misconceptionabout women: the toilet shows us that lesbianism is still “dirty,"and the women's violence against one another lets us refuse toaccept that lesbians are women who love other women. Newman assures his viewers that lesbians are just as perverse anddangerous as they've always imagined.Pornography encourages men to degrade all women, to degrade their own sexuality, and for women to degrade themselves. Feminist writer Tillie Olsen suggests that pornographyis the 'ideological element of a counter-revolution againstwomen." Producers and consumers of porn cannot accept theactuality of feminism, so they try harder and harder to showwomen in submissive — if not completely mutilated — positions.A woman is left bloody and smiling on the cover of Roxy Music'salbum, Stranded. A woman is happily stripped and gang rapedon a Love and Kisses album. An “emasculating" bald womanstabs a "vulnerable" man in the back on the Ohio Players' Cli¬max.And it is the record album covers and advertisements thatmost infuriate me; that are the most frightening. Many of themare geared for teen-agers,'who haven't yet developed a clearfeeling of sexuality, especially their own. They are told that it isnormal for men to have power over women; that it is necessaryto dominate us; that rape is OK.At the end of the slide show, Dana welcomed questions, butfirst she asked for comments. No one could speak. I realized Ihad jotted down a note on every slide to prevent me from blot¬ting out the images. My friend with the camera whispered simply, “That freaked me out." We had no words for our other reactions. I still don't. A few minutes after I left the slide show Iunfortunately grew angry at a woman who had refused to see itbecause it was "yukky." I realized it hadn't made me sick onlybecause it made me numb. Pornography is infinitely difficult totalk about, yet in order to get at the roots of what causes andperpetrates its wide spread appeal and acceptance, it must betalked about.N.BMoviesAn Unmarried Woman: Paul Ma-zursky (1978). This fake feministfare features Jill Clayburghdoing her Ingrid Bergman imita¬tion. She is a mother whose hus¬band walks out on her, AlanBates is his usual boisterous selfas the man she takes up with, andMichael Murphy is a worm. Ma-zursky (Bob & Carol, Ted &Alice; Harry and Tonto) used tobe an almost good director, buthis infatuation with Fellini and anew spurious seriousness havebrought him low. Thus the filmwinds up slugglishly paced, poorly photographed, and no morethan superficially dramatized.Doc Films, Tonight at 6:30,9, and11:30.Sherlock Junior: Buster Keaton(1924); and Why Worry?: FredNewmeyer and Sam Taylor(1923). These are two certified si¬lent comedy classics and both arestill pretty funny. Sherlock Jun¬ior is an absolute scream withBuster as an erstwhile young pro¬jectionist who is studying to be adetective. He winds up dreaminghimself into a film as the titlecharacter. Why Worry? is themost surreal, and probably thefunniest and best of the films featuring Harold Lloyd's somewhatless compelling figure. Here hegets involved with some giants inSouth America. Lloyd's classicshort, Never Weaken will also beshown. Law School Films, To¬night at 7 (both films) and at 9pm. Tuesday's Maroon incorrect¬ly listed these films for last night;we apologize for the inconven¬ience we have caused.Bread and Chocolate: FrancoBrusati (1978). The winner of the1978 Academy Award for BestForeign Film, this is a picaresque tale of an Italian looking forwork and home in Switzerland.Nino Manfredi is the worker andhopelessly genial. He provides afew funny and honestly felt mo¬ments: in one he tries to revivehis dead boss in order to find outwhere his money is. But there arealso some cheap moments (thekid who plays Mozart), and someinscrutable ones (the killer in thepark). There is no structure tospeak of, but the shots are plea¬santly framed — and besidesthere's Manfredi. Doc Films, Sat¬urday at 7 and 9:30 pm.La Soufriere: Werner Herzog(1977); Our Trip To Africa: PeterKubelka (1966); Les MaitresFous: Jean Rouch (1955); TheRiver: Pare Lorentz (1938). Thisis Doc's token evening of docu¬mentaries — and that's about allthey have in common. The first isHerzog's half-hour apology fornot having produced the film hewanted, a record of the last daysof a man who stayed behind on anevacuated island to face the vol¬cano. The volcano never erupted,and the film well captures theodd, tensed feeling of waiting,and the unsure confusion whenThe End does not arrive.The second film is a tightly-crammed five minutes-or-sowhich records a trip to Africa bysome rich Germans. A rush offragmented words, sounds, andimages; I don't know what it means, but it doesn't get a chanceto be boring.Les Maitres Fous is a film of apeculiar African tribal ritual bythe dean of ethnographic film¬makers, Rouch.Pare Lorentz's The River is thehoary classic of the evening, andif you can get behind the hoar,you may discover that the choricrepetitions of names — tastefullydone by Thomas Chalmers — therough and ready images, and therhythmically incisive cutting addup to a strong and poetically feltpicture of Nature. The on-loca-tion stuff of the flooding is alsofairly exciting, but the amazingshots of the impoverished share¬croppers are the only things I'veever seen that approach theclean-cut intensity of WalkerEvans' work. Doc Films, Sundayat 7:15 and 9:15 (La Soufriere);7:45 and 9:45 (Our Trip to Afri¬ca); 8 and 10 (Les Maitres Fous);and 8:30 and 10:30 pm. (TheRiver).The Missing Juror: Budd Boet-ticher (1945). Boetticher went onto make some fine films, espe¬cially his series of spare, tightlystructured, and classical west¬erns with Randolph Scott; butthis is well before those. Thisvery, very early effort by Boet¬ticher is a B-actioner and Boet-ticher's second picture. Its plotconcerns a man who takes re¬venge on the jury who sentencedan innocent man to death. DocFilms, Monday at 7:30 pm.Private Hell 36: Don Siegel(1954). Howard Duff and SteveCochran play two police detec¬tives in a Dragnet-Wke Los An¬geles. One, however, finds temp¬tation in the form of $80,000. Thescript (half discredit for whichgoes to co-starlet Ida Lupino) is atotal waste, and Ms. Lupino hasno better sense than we do ofwhat she's doing in this grittycrime drama. There are a few ex¬amples of some nice film noirphotography from Burnett Guf¬fey, shots positively drenched ininky blackness. There is also atleast one patented Don Siegel Se¬quence where, in long shot, ourheroes find the $80,000 blowing inthe late afternoon breeze. DocFilms, Monday at 8:45.All Doc Films are shown inQuantrell Auditorium and the ac¬cepted offering is $1.50 on Fri¬days, Saturdays, and Sundays;$1.25 on Mondays. Law SchoolFilms are shown in the LawSchool Auditorium, and cost$1.50.— Rory McCahanRock and Roll 'em: Facets' Fes¬tival of Rock and Roll Cinemarocks on for another week. Thenext two weekends look dynamite, and the mid-week scheduleseems intriguing. This weekend:The Harder They Come (Fri. at 7,Sat. at 4 and 8, Sun. at 6) and TheLast Waltz (Fri. at 9, Sat. at 6,Sun. at 4 and 8) are the main features. Other films this week inelude Bye, Bye Birdie, JailhouseRock, Fillmore and Rebel With¬out a Cause. Facets Multimedia,1517 W. Fullerton. 281-4114.Portrait of Teresa: The ChicagoInternational Film Festival isholding an exclusive showing ofPastor Vega's film as a benefit his is one of the hand-paintedIndian manuscript leaves thatare for sale at the RenaissanceSociety Art for Young CollectorsSale. A large selection of theseclassical miniature paintings,obtained in Delhi, is on display.for the Illinois Women's Agenda.The film portrays a marriedwoman caught up in the contradictions between traditional andevolutional values in modernCuba. Thurs., Nov. 15, at the Vil¬lage Theater, 1548 N. Clark.922-8530. $5. Tickets can be pur¬chased in advance through theMidwest Women's Center, 53 W.Jackson.MusicLunchtime Concert: This week'sprogram consists of trio sonatasby Quantz, Boismortier and Cas-tello, performed on baroque flute,recorder, harpsichord and violada gamba. Thurs., Nov. 15, inReynolds North Lounge, at 12:15pm.Sunday Blues; A History of Chi¬cago Blues: The Museum of Contemporary Art's five-week seriesmoves into its second week thisSunday with a concert illustrat¬ing the rise of the classic Chicagoblues band sound of the 1940's andearly 50's. Featured this weekwill be "Homesick" James Wil¬liamson, whose electric bottle¬neck guitar style is similar to, butwilder than that of his famous se¬cond cousin, the late ElmoreJames; Johnny Shines, anotherguitarist and a mainstay on theChicago blues scene since the30's; and Snooky Pryor, a bluesharpist who, in addition toleading his own band, has appeared with many of Chicago'sfinest bluesmen. Two sets: 1 and3 pm. 237 E. Ontario, 280-2660.$3.00, $2.00 for students. Admis¬sion includes both concert andgallery viewing. — B.L.The Police: Reggae-inflected popis the forte of this three mangroup. Opening act is Chicago'sown Pez Band. If you've neverbeen to the Riviera Theatre(Broadway at Lawrence), it's acasual cross between the Uptown(it has theater seats) and theAragon (it's not so fancy). Fri¬day, Nov. 9, 8:00 p.m. Tickets are$9.50 for main floor, $8.50 for balcony. — M.D.Music by Black Composers:Dieter Kober will conduct theChicago Chamber Orchestra in aprogram contrasting music byblack composers from Chicago toAfrica, and concluding with aclassic chamber symphony byHaydn. Featured composers in¬clude Florence Price, UlyssesKay, Samuel Akabot and the "Dean of Black American Com¬posers." William Grant Still.Three Negro Spirituals will besung by baritone Melvin Burks,who has appeared as a soloistwith the Chicago SymphonyChorus. Tues., Nov. 13 at MalcomX College, 1900 W. Van Buren at12:15 pm Free.University Nite: An inexpensiveway to hear the CSO is to makeuse of your student ID tonight.The Orchestra Hall concert,under the baton of the venerableErich Leinsdorf, includesPfitzner's three Preludes from"Palestrina," Tchaikovsky's"Romeo and Juliet," andStrauss' "Der Burger als Edetmann." Wednesday, Nov. 14 at 8.Tickets $4 $12. — T.S.Bella Davidovich: Russia hasproduced more than her share ofgreat pianists. Some, likeRichter, Gilels and Egorov, haveplayed extensively in the West;some, like Mme. Davidovich, areknown only to the cognoscenti.However, the case of Mme. Davi¬dovich is to be rectified Tuesday,Nov. 13 at 8:15 in Orchestra Hall.Her impressive Chicago debutprogram includes Mozart's Sonata #11 in A, Beethoven's #18 in Eb,Prokofiev's #3 in A, and all 24Preludes of Chopin. Tickets ($4$10) for her recital will be sold atthe box office. 751-7120.On the air"AlienNation is a highly editedcollage, combining scraps from avariety of popular culturalsources. Its exploration ofimage/sound relationships is in¬fused by a carefully modulatedirony." So says the press releasepublicizing this video tape. It'spart of the Everson Video Reviewat the Museum of Contemporaryart, and will also be broadcast tomorrow night at 10 on Channel 11See "Art" listings for MCA infor¬mation.The Underground Golf Course.This week, the Chicago RadioTheatre presents the world pre¬miere of Leo Goldman's newcomedy for radio. Mon. Nov. 12,on WFMT, 98.7 FM at 8 pm. ArtStudio Open Houses: Two HydePark artists' studios will haveopen houses this Sunday. AlmaMatthew and Debbie Shaperawill exhibit paintings, batiks andhand forged jewelry at 5471 S.Dorchester from 1-6 pm. Eric An¬derson, Flora Smith, Alex Topp,Alfred Tyler, Ami Tyler, ElaineWessel and Sophie Wessel will exhibit their work at 5499 S. HydePark Blvd. from 1-8 pm.Paul Klee: Gem-like works sel¬dom seen are on display at theWorthington Gallery, 233 E. On¬tario. Show runs through Dec. 1.Call 226 2424 for hours and otherdetails. — D.S.Sharon Lowen: Three styles ofIndian dance will be presented byMs. Lowen, who has been award¬ed the title Singar Mani (adorn¬ing jewel of the dance) by the SurSingar Samsad in Bombay. TheManipuri dance is from the farnortheast of India, the Chhua isthe dance associated with a festi¬val honoring Lorf Shiva andSurya, the Sun God; and Odissidance is seen in the poses ofsculptures in many temples. Thefree program will be presentedSun., Nov. 11, at 8 pm in Interna¬tional House.TheaterThe Fantasticks: Court Studio'sproduction of the musical hitcloses this Sunday. The curtainrises at 8:30 pm on Fri. and Sat.,and at 7:30 on Sun. Tickets are$2.50 for students and $3.50 forothers, and are available at theReynolds Club box office.753-3581.A Day in the Life of Joe Egg:Peter Nichols' drama of how acouple copes with their severelyhandicapped daughter opens atCourt Theatre Thurs, Nov. 15with a special $1.50 previewWed., Nov. 14. in the NewTheatre, 57th and University.Thurs.-Sun. through Dec. 22 (ex¬cept Thanksgiving Day), 8.30pm, 7:30 on Sundays. $4.50 Thurs.and Sun. S5.50 Fri. and Sat., $2.50and $3 for students.the grey city journalGary Beberman, Curtis Black, Marie Breaux, Laura Cottingham, Melanie Deal,Abbe Fletman, Jackie Hardy, Sandy Harris, Bennett Jacks, Karen Kapner, KurtKeefner, Bob Lewis, Philip Maher, Mary Mankowski, Rory McGahan, Robin Mitchell, Mark Neustadt, Sharon Pollack, Renee Saracki, Robert Saska, DannySchulman, Ted Shen, Rob Sturm, Lisa von Drehle, Ken Wissoker and Phoebe Zerwick.Edited by David Miller. Calendar compiled by Rebecca Lillian. Not associate editor: Karen Hornick. Produced by Katherine Larson and David Miller.Contributions from Tim Baker, Ozzie Enders, Nets Erickson, John Kim, Tom Hanchett and Margo Slauson. Friday, November 9, 1979 Safe Energy Festival/Holty NearA concert by feminist singerand activist Holly Near will cul¬minate the Safe Energy Festivalto be held Saturday afternoon atNavy Pier.Holly Near is inspiring. Hervoice, rich enough to sound stronga capella, as well as to blend per¬fectly with pianist J. T. Thomas’skillful accompaniment, alwaysconveys what she feels. It smilesduring sweet, up beat lyrics like"You bet I sing love songs!/Songs of mother-love/songs ofmy lover's love/singing the songsof loving myself." It cries whilewailing in Spanish about womencaptured by the Chilean junta. Itis angry and proud when singing,almost shouting, "Fight Back!"The lyrics of "Fight Back!" "And so we've got to fight back/in largenumbers/Fight back/I can't make it alone/Fight back/in largenumbers/ together we can make a safe home" were originally writtenagainst rape and violence. Yet, they easily apply to the purpose of HollyNear's tour: a nuclear free future."We believe in a nuclear free future," says the singer. "We believe inbeing responsible for our own lives. It will take us all . . . working together to preserve this special planet."A coalition of Chicago organizations is sponsoring the Safe EnergyFestival, which begins at 2 pm. Events and performers at the festivalinclude: Chispa, a Chicana musical group ensemble, lectures by DeccieSenn and Dr. Rosalie Bertell; Chicago singer songwriter Ginni Clemmens; and various exhibits by various energy related organizationsand stores. The Heartland Cafe will serve all afternoon, and right beforethe concert.Admission to every event but the Holly Near concert is free; tickets tothe concert are $5 in advance, $6 at the gate, and are available at Spin Itrecords. For more information about the festival, call 761 8765.—Rebecca Lillianthe grey city journal, Friday, November 9, 1979 — 3Holly NearScript by Kurt Keefner; drawn by Robert SaskaStamp outrock and roll ignoranceMany students may not know or care, butthe University bookstore at 58th and Ellissells two of the best rock 'n' roll journals inthe world: New Musical Express from Eng¬land and New York Rocker from New YorkCity. It has come to my attention, however,that the bookstore's distributor in New Yorkfor these journals ships only a few NME'sand a whole box full of New York Rockers.My friend, Cid, spoke to one of the men atthe bookstore about this situation and wastold that the bookstore's relations with thisdistributor were somewhat erratic. Myfriend encouraged him for these brave ac¬tions, and the man replied by saying that theNew York Rockers were not selling and thatunless they started selling soon the book¬store would not continue this service. If thisis true, rock 'n' roll fans in Hyde Park willbe done a great disservice.New York Rocker is, first and foremost, arock 'n' roll fanzine — a rock and roll maga¬zine for fans and not just casual readers.This magazine contains some very goodwriting and has in-depth articles on almostevery new and exciting band around today.Not only is the writing good but the maga¬zine also has excellent design and is oftenchock full of great pictures that do wondersfor dorm walls.Earlier this year New York Rocker re¬viewed an unknown pop band called TheKnack and many of the writer's pointed andinsightful criticisms were repeated nu¬merous time throughout the year in other"original rock magazines." Not only canNew York Rocker's writers write but on thewhole, they can also suss out genuine popphenomenons like The Buzzcocks from paleimitations like The Knack or The Cars. It isthis commitment to rock 'n' roll and what itoriginally stood for that separates NewYork Rocker from the ultra-trendy RollingStone, which will print articles praising al¬most any group that is currently popular.I realize that New York Rocker is not amagazine for the average rock 'n' roll"fan". But, for those people that are trulydedicated to good rock 'n' roll, New YorkRocker is the magazine for them. And youcan buy it at your local bookstore for only$1.25. What a bargain! Buy New YorkRocker and make Hyde Park a cooler placeto live. Renee Saracki Life of CottinghamSmart exhibitThis is the third time in as many weeks that we've run a photo by Rolf Achilles. You maywell wonder why. Besides the fact that Rolf is an excellent photographer, the photo aboveeffectively reveals the extreme beauty of the installation of the Abstract Expressionist shownow at the Smart Gallery. (Installation means the hanging of pictures and the general arrangement of a gallery space).Last Sunday two G.C.J. reporters walked into the Smart and found a truly idyllic scene.Students were lounging around, some without shoes, some dressed like crud, but all part of awhole. Even the occasional professor-figure blended in with the casual crowd. The installa¬tion directed by Susanne Ghez and Richard Born was responsible for the familial feelingseldom felt among people looking at pictures. Just a reminder that you've only got untilNovember 25 to experience it. — Danny Schulman Editor:For the benefit of us un-cool, un-hip andotherwise terminally unsophisticated read¬ders ofyour paper's movie reviews, couldsomeone in your office please provide mewith a translated version of Laura Cot-tingham's review(?) of Monty Python'snew movie? I mean, like man, I just don'tdig where her head's at, you dig?Just another unsophisticated slob,Jeremy PaulReader:I don't understand "Life of Brianreviewed" either, and so I think we must befaulted for its inaccessibility. Still, wesometimes become too serious, and thematerial in this case seemed to lend itself tolighter treatment. But just in case "Life ofBrian reviewed" wasn't just a vacantsophistication (I overheard Laura muttersomething about "the great social documentof the century" as she pasted it up), I'veasked Laura to explain herself.David MillerLaura CottinghamTask force revisitedDespite competition from midterms andEnglish Country Dancing Music blaring infhe theatre next door, the Dean's StudentTask Force met this Wednesday to discussMethodology, Content and Skill. They havedebated these concepts previously, and pro¬vide the following explanations:Methodology, which concerns differentmodes of thinking and asking questions, isapplied to Content. Skill involves theunderstanding and communication of thesetwo areas.Turnout (9) was disappointing, largelydue to a lack of publicity about the meeting.In the future, however, meetings will beregularly scheduled every Wednesday nightat 8 in the Memorial Room on the secondfloor of Ida Noyes. New participants arewelcome. — Lisa von Drehle the grey cityis (still) looking for writersJust one example: there must be hundreds of students here who enjoyvisiting art museums and galleries. Why are so few of them writing in ourpages? Now, apply this question to the following fields: The theater.Dance. Photography. Radio. Classical Music. All rock except New Wave.High culture. Low culture. Food. Love. The Blues. Architecture. Perfor¬mance art. Animals. Politics. Books. Cartoons. Movies. Television. Reli¬gion. Neighborhoods. Trivia. Import. Jazz. People. Manners. Morals.What matters. We are interested in more writers in all of these fields, infields in between these fields, and in fields not mentioned. Call 753-3265, orcome by the office (Ida Noyes 303). Ask for David, Karen or somebody onthe grey city staff.** Rocks and stars **by Bennett JacksFlirting is bewitching. A glance between two strangers can betruly embarrassing in its intimacy. In a moment something passesbetween two people which cannot be comprehended or replaced. Itis as if all known things reside calmly in the eyes.I found myself being stared at in one of my classes the other day.First I sensed it and then I knew it. When I looked up I stared backand quickly averted my eyes. I was entangled. I was embarrassed.But even though I looked back, a bit of me was taken and I tooksomething in return. I could not look back to the eyes that had captured my attention, for they also captured me and made my palmssweat. To be cold would enable me to stare back; to be wise wouldprevent my capture.The U of C is flirting with us. With a soul of innocence I steppedonto the campus about six weeks ago and I was taken. Gargoylestouched me everywhere I went — and they still do. I was instantlyintrigued by what makes this place what it is — and what is it? Tofind out I have found I must work hard. I must ask because I wantto know, and it is embarrassing because my questions are rooted ininnocence. But the University has invited me to ask, and it has invited with encouragement. Like the gazing eyes it is daring me to ask its name — but it is not defying me to.I have discovered what happens when I do what the Universityasks me to do: I learn something I did not know before, and I findthere is something else I do not know. This flirting continues, forthe University is too wise for a simple glance. And so is the rest ofthe world.I could choose to deny I am bewitched. I could say the Universityis not terribly interested in having me here. I could claim the Uni¬versity is not worth being entangled with. But this romance is toostrong, and it will control me until I begin to understand it.I am willing to take the risk that I may find great faults here thatI cannot reconcile as faults within myself. Innocence has its limits.If I begin to complain it will probably result from thinking I knowwhat lies behind those flirting eyes before I really do.The University has forewarned me: I will not wake up and dis¬cover I am wise. Our flirtation is a slow process, and there will beno particular day when I will be able to doubt the wisdom of the U ofC.I cannot unveil the eyes of the University and it cannot unveilmine. No one in this relationship will make anyone wise. But thedance will continue, and with any luck at all will become a part oflife. At first,the bees in the garbage by the Agoraseemed to be the stuffpoetry and fables are made of.But, really, they were so unpoetic:just a dozen beesdrowning in syrupy red soda.Ugly, greedy bees that died as they drank.And besides,I think we often havethe opposite problem.4 — the grey city journal, Friday, November 9, 1979 Rebecca Lilliansponse to pornography’s defenserespond to and “revolutionize” both femaleand male sexual needs.Both pornography and rape are based onmisogyny. Pornography is produced by menfor men. What is important to the produc¬ers/directors/authors/editors is the materi¬al which will turn on the man. Women arepaid to perform male fantasies — that is,their economic and emotional vulnerabilityis exploited in order to depict myths fulfill¬ing a socially perverted male sexuality. Theword, “pornography”, stems from theGreek, meaning “the depiction of harlots”— and thus stems also from a form of “ac¬ceptable” — economic and emotional — co¬ercion: prostitution.Pornography is not the source of sex-op- they want, “whether it (!!) be material ob¬jects in a store window, or women.” Thisequivalence must be seen as invalid. Hisreadiness to accept it depends on what weconsider rape to be: if it is the violation of awoman’s right to physical/sexual self-deter¬mination it is a unique and incomparablecrime, and deserves special attention, as tohow it came to be invented in the first place,(although it does have correlative crimes —the denial of abortion, for example); if rapeis considered, however, an issue over whichmen do and should have control, the viola¬tion of a basic human right is transformedinto the lessening of a woman’s worth tomen, and there is seen a direct, easy equiva¬lence between rape and theft. Mr. Rembasees rape in such a light, for in mocking ourKN„f f >' Mi r"'r*Mi ^ I "J 0>Mn «tlfF '4V sr •/ -** d)r-xyo,Each of us must begin in her/his own mind to disen¬tangle sex and domination. It is not enough to repress(and/or punish oneself for) their continuing confusion inoneself. We must each learn a kindness towardsourselves...pression. It rather supports, reinforces andjustifies a sex-oppressive ideology, which isused in turn to degrade and terrorizewomen. Pornography is then a type of politi¬cal propaganda which passes on the mes¬sage of the extent to which perverted malebehavior will be accepted and even deemeddesirable.Behind these secondary myths which ob¬scure the extent of sexual coercion lie fun¬damental myths that support such oppres¬sion. One of these “primary myths” is theequivalence of women and property. Our ac¬ceptance of Mr. Remba’s argument dependson our ability to see “rape” subsumed under“general violence”, especially violenceagainst property. He talks of those “subcul¬tural individuals” who take “what” (!!) representation of the rapist as “more spe¬ciously, a man” and by adding “like your¬self or myself” he reveals which portion ofhis readership he is addressing, and whichhe ignores. And thus the old, pervertingmyths linger on.Mr. Remba reveals his commitment sole¬ly to the male point of view in his argumentthat the objectification of women is“healthy”. Could it be, we hoped, readingthe article, that Mr. Remba has just con¬fused the joyful integration of the intenselyphysical into the emotionally sexual with“objectification”? But no, such healthy sex¬uality is not indicated. He states: “there isnothing intrinsically wrong with such a one¬sided (objectifying) relationship, just as it isnot ‘wrong’ to choose to savor the physical texture of a painting or sculpture, as an artobject, to the detriment of its color andstyle.” He thus equates the objectification ofan object with the objectification of a humanbeing. It’s incredible. Not only this, but heassumes that the only significant costs to ob¬jectification lie with the “objectifier”, inhow such a perceptual process limits theman who engages in it. He does not even in¬vestigate possible costs to the “objectified”— the cost to a woman, for example, ofnever being sure that a man at a given mo¬ment considers her a human being and notan “art” object.A “secondary” myth through which Mr.Remba reveals his male-oriented bias is theassumption that Playgirl is to women whatPlayboy is to men. Playgirl, however, is notthe development of a correlative, “female”,pornography; it is an extension of old per¬verted male myths. It is just another (male-oriented) attempt to convince the publicthat there are no alternatives to oppression,objectifying sexuality — that if women hadpower — as women get power — they wouldand they will want from men what men sup¬posedly want from women: certain mechan¬ically physical performances and a sense oftheir own power. In this denying of alterna¬tives, in this extension of male perversions,the sexual imagination continues to be crip¬pled and warped.Finally, by rejecting and mocking femin¬ism, Mr. Remba blinds himself to the pos¬sibilities of real sexual change. For he dis¬misses the anti-pornography, feministmovement as reactionary. This dimissalstems from a traditional male fear thatwomen just want to constrict men, andwould if they had the power.First of all, Women Against Pornographydoes not advocate censorship; it rather pro¬poses education and awareness. We do un¬derstand, however, the anti-pornographymovement’s appeal to conservatives. Weacknowledge that the roots of American fe¬minism are entwined with the fight for chas¬tity and abstinence, and against sex. Someearly feminists could not see beyond the per¬verted image of sexuality imposed by thisEat it! Continued from Page 3 society; on the basis of this limited percep¬tion they equated sexuality with exploitationand fought against it.But the feminist goal is not the constric¬tion of men — it is the liberation of humanbeings. We know that we can move beyondtraditional cripplings and sexuality — wehave already begun such a movement. Be¬cause we understand the fears that a misin¬terpretation of “sexual liberation” engen¬ders, we support traditional, still fearfulpeople, and encourage them through oursupport to understand liberation and fightfor it. This does not imply, however, that wewill ever give up any of our struggles — forabortion, against heterosexism, to namejust two —. We are, however, committed toteach that sex is not inherently exploitative,that it is in fact the energy of newly creativesexuality that will be one of the strongestforces to burst old oppressive structures andto construct the new world.We all live in a pornographic society. Fe¬minists do not argue from a position of puri¬ty; rather we speak from our commitmentto fight our personal and political waysthrough the manifestation of pornography inour societies and ourselves.For sexuality poses a personal threat, the“threat” of intimacy. Sexuality may consti¬tute the most vulnerable of all humanspheres. It is in such a sphere that we needprotection. But do we protect ourselves bylearning to love and understand ourselves,or do we do so by evading responsibility — toourselves, to others, and to the creativeproblem itself — by rigidifying the processand dominating/brutalizing others — inshort, by pretending that we can force peo¬ple to fill our needs?The process of working through sexist,pornographic society is a laborious one.There is, of course, obvious “external'’, po¬litical work to be done. The personal effort,however, may require more energy. Each ofus must begin in her/his own mind to disen¬tangle sex and domination. It is not enoughto repress (and/or punish oneself for) theircontinuing confusion in oneself. We musteach learn a kindness toward ourselves, akindness that will give us the strength towork through fantasies of power differen¬tials. We must learn what our fundamentalsexual needs are, to learn how sexuality canreestablish ties between people rather thansever them.This is not the old Christian notion of cut¬ting off the offending part; we do not cry“Down with smut! ” We have more trust andfaith in human nature than that. We willtransform sexuality so that it creates eroti¬ca, not pornography; we must work to reha¬bilitate. liberate — in short, to humanize —sexuality. For we believe that to makehuman is to liberate. And so we struggletoward a future in which sexuality is ram¬pant; — and the devastating inventions ofrape and pornography are beyond all of ourfinally human — free — imaginations.Adrienne Weseley is a graduate student incomparative literature. She was assisted inthe preparation of this piece by severalfriends.occurred to us we were going on a real plane trip. We pro¬ceeded on to the gate and waited for the plane, en routefrom Detroit, to arrive. When it came we walked out andup the steps tto the freshly painted DC-9, found a windowseat, and tried to get some sleep.One hour and ten minutes later we touched down atKansas City International Airport, which neither handlesinternational flights, nor is located in Kansas City. Wefound a downtown bus and the trail to Bryant’s grew hot¬ter. After getting off the bus we found a map, and began ahike to Bryant’s, at 18th and Brooklyn, walking alongsidethe American Royal Parade, past the Main Street Mor¬gue, and along 18th St. Realizing Brooklyn was fartherthan we thought, and the scenery not too worthwhile, weflagged down another bus, drove two stops past Brooklyn,and got off. Backtracking we noticed the rear of a houselittered with empty pop bottles, stray cats and jugs.Bryant’s.Located next to several vacant lots, Bryant’s has palegreen siding, a sign, which wasn’t lit up, but would havesaid “Bryants” and an unwashed picture window. Westepped into the white formica dining room, glanced at thefoursome drinking a pitcher of beer. Regrouping oursenses, we strode up to the counter.“What can I do for you, my man,” said the counter¬man.“Three orders of ribs, please,” we said. “No ribs until 11.”Yikes! We glanced at the time: 10:30 am, which isusually when our alarm clock goes off for the first time.Still, we were starving.“You can get some beef or ham,” suggested the coun¬terman.We ordered two barbecued ham sandwiches and somefries, walked over to the pop machine for Dr. Pepper, andbegan to eat like pigs. The sandwiches were delicious andseemed to be whole hams between four pieces of bread, aswere the fries, which were made from fresh potatoes andfried in pure lard. We were just cleaning our plates as theribs became ready for consumption. Two slabs of ribs, twomore orders of fries, two handfuls of burnt beef brisketedges and several pops later, we began to consider ourtake out order. We picked up several more slabs of ribsand handfuls of burnt edges for the more unfortunate peo¬ple still in Chicago. We also bought enough barbecuesauce to get us through the coming winter. There wereonly a half dozen people in Bryant’s when we came, but aline that catalogued all humanity stretched past the frontdoor as we left.After we left Bryant’s we decided to find a motel roomand get some sleep before making our dinner plans. Wedozed off dreaming of a Winstead’s double cheese¬burger.After dinner (a few double cheeseburgers, several frosty malts, and more fries) we strolled through thenearby shopping and entertainment area, called thePlaza. Originally we had been turned off by the descrip¬tion of the place: “noted for its Spanish and Moorish ar¬chitecture.” Our first response had been “No it’s not” butout opinion changed when we began walking through it.The Spanish and Moorish architecture was noted.We considered our return trip home. It seemed to us itwould be easier to make the 37 cent flight back to Chicagothan it was to come down to Kansas City. Just to be sure,we counted up our money, in case we had to catch a real,full fare flight back. Among our expenses: flight down, 37cents. Bus from airport, $4. Arthur Bryant's, $4 per slap ofribs, $3.25 for a ham sandwich. Winstead’s double chee¬seburger, $1.85. We decided that the trip down to KansasCity set us back about as much as a trip to a North Siderestaurant.We arrived back at the airport at noon for the 5:15 flight,about twentieth in line. We were on the 37 cent specialback to Chicago a few minutes after five, and the planearrived at Midway ahead of schedule. We walked over tothe comer of 55th and Cicero to catch the 55 bus When itcame, we dropped 40 cents in the box. and sat down, feel¬ing pretty smart.“That’s 45 cents, sir,” said the bus driver.“Huh?”“New fares.”Friday, November 9, 1979 — The Chicago Maroon — 13ATTENTIONFACULTY AND STUDENTSIN ORDER TO CLEAR THE SHELVES FOR THEWINTER QUARTER, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 16.WILL BE THE LAST DAY MOST AUTUMNQUARTER TEXTS WILL BE AVAILABLE.* THE TEXTBOOK DEPARTMENT WILL BEOPEN FOR BUSINESS AFTER THIS DATE.MANY AUTUMN TEXTS ARE BEING HELDFOR WINTER QUARTER AND WILL BE ONTHE SHELVES.* AUTUMN QUARTER TEXTS NOT YETRECEIVED AS OF THIS DATE WILL BESTOCKED FOR SALE AS SOON AS THEYARRIVE. The Visiting Committee to The Department of MusicpresentsPerspectives on OperaMonday, November 12Mr. Winton Dean,Surrey, EnglandHandel and Opera TodayMonday, November 19Professor William C. Holmes,The University of California, IrvineThe Reworking of Giuseppe Verdi’sLa Forza del DestinoAll lectures will be held at 8:00 P.M. inBreasted Hall, The Oriental Institute1155 East 58th StreetAdmission is free and open to the publicTHE MORRIS FISHBEIN CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE HISTORYOF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE, THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGOpresents aSymposium on the Sociology of ScienceIn Honor off file 50th Anniversary off theSocial Science Research BuildingNOVEMBER 133 p.m. IntroductionEdward Shils, The University of Chicago"Social Influences on the Growth of ScientificKnowledge"Jonathan Cole, Columbia UniversityStephen Cole, SUNY at Stony Brook"The Ethos of Science: The Last Half Century"Joseph Ben-David, The University of Chicago8 p.m. "Problems and Problematics in the Sociology ofScience: The Second Two Decades"Jerry Gaston, Southern Illinois UniversityCommentaryDavid Joravsky, Northwestern UniversityNOVEMBER 143 p.m. "Scientific Disciplines and the Crisis of Orientation"Wolf Lepenies, Free University of BerlinCommentaryArnold W. Ravin, The University of Chicago8 p.m. "Durkheim and Mauss Revisited"David Bloor, The University of EdinburghCommentaryJean Comaroff, The University of ChicagoAll UcturM will b« hold in Social Scionca 122, II26 E. 59th Stroot, Tho Univarsity of ChicagoTHE PUBLIC IS CO BDIALLY INVITED Can you picture yourself ...cataloging slides of Pre-Columbian art?teaching adults to swim?assisting the editor of a campus based journal?working with preschool childrenin a day care center?These and many other jobs, ranging from 5 to 20 hours per week,are available for graduate and college students who are eligiblefor theWORK/STUDYPROGRAMFor further information, please contactSara Johnson. Work/Studv CoordinatorOffice of Career Counseling and PlacementReynolds Club. Room 2(H)14 — The Chicago Maroon — Friday, November 9, 1979« News BriefsCambodian plightInternational House v/ill be holding twomeetings in the next few days for thoseinterested in finding out about the Cam¬bodian relief effort. This Sunday, RobertStein of the Indo-Chinese Action Center,and a representative from the State De¬partment will speak at 1 p.m. in theHome room. Then on Monday night at7:30, the first meeting of'the CambodianRelief Now: Hyde Park Action Groupwill be held, also in the Home RoomAnderson campaignsZonis explainsRepublican Presidential candidateJohn B. Anderson is scheduled to speakthis Saturday at noon in InternationalHouse. He will present “A Candidate’sViews on International Relations and Ed¬ucation in an Interdependent World.”Anderson will be the first Presidentialcandidate from either major party tovisit the University during the 1980 cam¬paign. A 20-year veteran of the House ofRepresentatives, Anderson has servedthe last ten of those years as chairman ofthe House Republican Conference. Hewas one of the first candidates to an¬nounce his entry into the campaign.Anderson's appearance at Internation¬al House is part of the Midwest RegionalConference of the Fulbright Alumni As¬sociation, a group made up of former re¬cipients of Fulbright grants for studyabroad. Most of the conference, includ¬ing Anderson’s speech, is open to Univer¬sity students.At 2 pm the same afternoon, the confer¬ence will sponsor a seminar on ‘‘The Isla¬mic Revolution: Causes. Effects and In¬ternational Impact.”Speaking at the seminar will be MarvinZonis, director of the center for middleeastern studies at the University and oneof the nation’s foremost experts on Iran,and M. Cherif Bassiouni, professor of in¬ternational law at DePaul University andspecialist in Arab World developments.The seminar is also open to Universitystudents.Writing helpUndergraduates can get help with allaspects of writing papers by visiting theWriting Tutors in Gates-Blake #203. OpenOffice Hours for autumn quarter are thefollowing:Monday — 9 a m. to 12:30p.m. and 3 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.Tuesday — 10 a m. to 12 p.m.and 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.Wednesday — 9:15 a m. to 12:30 p.m. and 2 p.m. to 5p.m.Thursday — 10 a.m. to 12p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.Friday — 9:30 a.m. to 12:30p.m.If these hours are not convenient, stu¬dents can phone the tutors to make ap¬pointments. The office phone number is753 4728. The tutors have mailboxes inGates-Blake #319—A. Last year, over 200students contacted the tutors eachquarter.Party for WalterLet us sing the praise of WalterJeschke:Sign painterGuardian of artKing of Ida Noyes and Wash PromHanger of bannersDeliverer of baked goodsCompanion to the Weintraub campersHandsome devilThough he leaves us soon for AlabamaWe have time for one long last hosannaFor Walter’s getting married to a South¬ern belleJoin us Tuesday at Ida’s, 4:30,We ll wish him well JohnsonContinued from page 1Besides making up the University’s bud¬get, the provost is party to all tenure deci¬sions. Johnson said that tenure decisions areextremely difficult because they have “sucha significant impact on other people’slives.”In order to make tenure decisions, the pro¬vost has to evaluate the materials of aca¬demics from various fields “eveything fromhumanities to energy physics.” Being ableto read and evaluate different types of mate¬rials is an important function of the pro¬vost’s duties, Johnson said.Despite the fact that Edward Levi, Wil¬son, and Gray served as provosts before be¬coming president (Gray had been Yale’sprovost), Johnson was quick to differentiatethe role’s of president and provost.‘‘There is a substantive difference be¬tween the provost and the president. Theprovost works from within the Universitywhile the president must deal with that aswell as representing the University.”Johnson was a member of the committeewhich chose Robert McNamara as the firstrecipient of the Pick Award. Throughout thecontroversy surrounding the award, John¬son stood by the committee’s decision.Now, six months following the presenta¬tion of the award, Johnson said the awardhad been a “learning experience” for him.The award has increased my knowledgeof human nature. I had always assumed thatredemption was possible and I regret thatthere are such people who do not think soand I regret that I did not know that.”The Pick Award, Johnson said, was beingoveremphasized in articles about Gray’sfirst year in office.“It is unfortunate that it keeps comingup.” he said.Johnson has served in many positions dur¬ing his 34 years at the University. From 1960to 1970, he was dean of the social science di¬vision; from 1971 to 1972, the acting directorof the library; from 1971 to 1975, chairmanof the economics department, and provostand dean of the faculties since 1975.Johnson said he will now return to teach¬ing and research, concentrating specificallyon a revision of one of his books. He is con¬sidered a world-wide authority on agricul¬tural economics.LettersContinued from Page 7The phrase “sexual violence" leads us toRemba's second major lapse in reasoning Although he does not want to deny the “sex¬ual component” of rape, he actually does so.In a world where women would not beviewed as “sex objects,” rape would re¬main, (Remba blithely asserts) as long asnonsexual violence remained. Why is thisso? Is there no sexual component operat¬ing? Why wouldn’t a “hurt” (deranged!again > individual simply engage in assaultsupon the surface, assaults directed to hurt ina nonsexual way? The answer to that ques¬tion actually resides in the ideology of oursociety, an ideology that tends to portraywomen as objects of release and desire, thereceptacle of men’s violence, containers ofan invasive and disrespectful form of vio¬lence.The point is that forms of violence as re¬sponses to events or conditions are shapedby a culture’s ideology, at least insofar asideology provides the range of possible re¬sponses. The existence of two sexes is thebiologically given of the human condition;the response to that condition, however, isnot a given, but is a product of a society’sevolving vision of how the sexes can andshould relate. Specifically sexual violencecan not be reduced to violence, with but amere nod of the head towards its sexualcomponent.” Rape is violence arising in aparticular context, with a particular inten-tionality. As a matter of fact, it seems to methat Remba accepts violence as a “given”and assumes it as some kind of independentabsolute. But violence is always intentional,always directed; it is difficult to imagineviolence without its channeling or shapingdeterminants, be they simple economicstruggles for survival, or more complicatedideologies of racism or sexism. One wouldthink that a student of philosophy wouldthink an issue through a little more careful¬ly-Which brings me to a final point. Despiteits trappings and pretensions. Remba’s let¬ter is not a logical analysis, but an ideologi¬cal assertion. Remba writes: “But clearly itis not a particular sexual orientation whichper se leads to acts of rape.” Granted, but“Mr. Wissoker and Co.” never claimed thatpornography is a proximate cause of rape;but it is part of, and a perpetuation of anideology of which rape is an extreme man¬ifestation. Yet rape is, for Remba. absolute¬ly nothing but an act of violence, nurturedonly by a culture of violence. The general(rather than particular) sexual orientationof a society is, for him. a totally separatesphere, a sphere that apparently has no con¬sequential impingements on society atlarge. “Remba’s reduction” strikes me asthe rationalizations of one who does notwant to complicate his moral life by ques¬tioning the implications of an activity thathe enjoys. It is moral quietism at best; atworst an example of a sophistry used fordecades by Messrs. Hefner and Co.Jerry Dyergraduate studentin English educationsypiail mw’ jmm sk • rA printer’s error left the above photo a fugitive to our pages on Tuesday:Here Leopold (left) and Loeb are brought to justice.Friday. November 9, 1979 — The Chicago Maroon — 15«*■WINTER COURT THEATRE presentsin The New Theatre, 57th and UniversityThursdays and Sundays, November 1 5 thru December 228:30 p.m., Sundays at 7:30 A Day in flit Death ofSpecial preview 8:30, Wednesday, Nov, 1 4 Only $1.00 JOE E66by Peter Nicholsdirected by Nicholas Rudallset design by Linda Buchanan\COLLEGE V*SENIORSItikeYourFuture In HandFriday,November 16thSaturdayNovember 17thRepresentatives trom TheAmerican University in Wash¬ington, D.C. will be in Chicago toprovide inlormation aboutgraduate programs ot theCollege ot Arts and Sciences,College ot Public and InternationalAltairs, and the Kogod College otBusiness Administration.We cordially invite all inter¬ested students to visit with ourrepresentatives at:TheAmerican± University THE HOLIDAY INNAT MART PLAZAin the Western Stage Room350 North Orleans StreetChicago, Illinois 60654Friday November 16,1 p.m.-5 p.m.Saturday November 17,10 a.m.—1 p.m.If you have anyquestions pnor to ourvisit, please callalumnus Cynthia Stach(312) 423-0607 otter6 p.m in the evening SEASONEDFIREWOODWe DeliverAsk for Russ 221-0918Texas Instruments"50scientific calculatorwith statistics andnew Constantmemory’feature.LIST PRICEs4000POWERFUL SCIENTIFIC FUNCTIONS• 60 functions automatically handle a wide rangeQUR PRICEslide-rule functions: roots, powers reciprocals. SO A 00common and natural logarithms, and trigonometryin degrees, radians, or grads• Includes many special functions such as pi. algepraic percentconstant, factorial, scientific notation and mantissa expansionFULL STATISTICAL FUNCTIONS• Built in statistical functions include data entry mean, and standarddeviations and variances tor both sample and population data• Helps you to handle large sets of data points and boil downdata with the most commonly used statistical calculationsSlimline 50" with newConstant memory™ feature.University of Chicago Bookstore5750 S. Ellis AvenueCalculator Dept., 2nd Floor753-3303MASTERCHARGE & VISA ACCEPTEDS0UTHSIDE JOHNNYand the ASBURY JUKESplus YIPES!Mandel Hall Nov. 17 9:00TICKETS ON SALE NOW!good seats still availableMAB fee payers $3.50 & $4.50 Others $7 & $816 _ The Chicago Maroon — Friday, November 9, 1979Tough Wheaton defeats soccer teamBy Allen SowizralThe varsity soccer team ended its seasonon Wednesday afternoon and the finale wasvery much like the opener in that theMaroons suffered a disappointing defeat atthe hands of a non-conference apponent.This time it was Wheaton that managed todash any hopes of an upset that the Maroonsmay have had by handing Chicago a 3-0defeat.This was the third time this season thatthe Maroons have been shut out, havingbeen held scoreless by Northwestern in theseason opener and by Washington Universi¬ty in two other non-conference games. This,/ - '*Getting up for basketballIM’s F-hockey finishfell into place. The forward line, well sup-by Monica Jonesand Cathy PhillipsThe varsity field hockey team ended itsseason by dropping three of four matches ata Rockford College tournament. ThreeChicago players were honored when tworegional teams were selected from amongthe top competitors at the tournament.At Chicago’s first game against Concordiaon Friday morning the team played betterthan it had all season. The teams were close¬ly matched and the 0-3 loss did not reflectthe good playing of Chicago. The Concordiagoalie was the strongest at the tournamentand Chicago was unable to score against herdespite their strong offensive effort.The second game that day was againstValparaiso. Valparaiso is a very fast team,dominated by several very strong players.Chicago continued to play well, especiallysweeper Donna Cioffi and goalie Gail Ell-ingwood who played consistently well underpressure from the Valparaiso forward line.Chicago lost, however, 0-4 despite these ef¬forts.The third game, on Saturday morning,was against Rockford, the tournament host,whom Chicago had already played twiceearlier in the season. In this gameeverything the team had been working on ported by the midfield, was able to carry theball down the field and keep it in the Chicagoattacking half of the field. During the firsthalf of the game Anna Molinaro, a halfback,scored the first goal. Then Rockford scored,evening the score to 1-1. In the second halfMaria Elena Malo and Liz Puschek eachscored, bringing the score to 3-1. Rockfordgot one more goal, but was unable to scorethe third point to create a tie, and Chicagowon.The last game, following just an hourafter the Chicago victory, was againstWhitewater. Chicago continued to play well,but the team was tired from the earliergame and they were unable to score andultimately lost 0-3.A committee of “selectors,” made up ofteam members and coaches, chose theMaroons’ Bloomfield to play on their secondteam. Donna Cioffi as an alternate for thesecond team and awarded Missy Caudhillhonorable mention. Cioffi and Bloomfieldwill play this weekend in Deerfield, Illinois,where they will have a chance to be selectedfor the Midwest team, which will be chosenby the United States Field Hockey Associa¬tion, the same body that selects the UnitedStates Olympic field hockey team.From the pressboxI only work hereBy Howard Suls“That'll cost you five (dollars).’’ JohnThomas, IM Officials Supervisor.“I’ll give you five (fingers).’’ Edward“Mad Dog’’ Connelly.For those of you who follow this column,let me remind you of the article of October19 “On Cooling IMs ”, where I spoke aboutbeing levelheaded, cool-tempered, andmore tolerant, especially of officials.Well, now that IMs have started, and Ihave had the opportunity to play somefootball, not only do I remember why I hadto write that column, but I found myself inthe same position I warned against beingin.All I wanted to do was play football andhave a good time. I almost did. However, Iwas upset by the officials. Not all of the of¬ficials all the time, or even all of the offi¬cials some of the time, but some of the offi¬cials some of the time. Part of myfrustration was due to the rules, which canat best be described as arbitrary and con¬fusing. Let me explain.Why are there 15 yard penalties on a 60yard field? Why can’t you raise your armswhen the other team is punting? Why isthere no two-on-one blocking, either withintwo yards of the line, or two yards behindthe line, depending on who you talk to?Why can’t we play flag football?You think I’m the only one upset? AskDudley. With fourth down and the otherteam punting in a crucial situation, theywere called for illegal procedure. Evenwith the five yards marched off, the otherteam had to punt. Or did they? No, it wasruled an automatic first down. No, yousay, illegal procedure on the defense isn’tan automatic first down. That’s what Dud¬ley said. So much for winning. Wait a min¬ute, you say again, didn’t they protest? Of course they did. What happened, you ask.Did justice, fair play, and the AmericanWay prevail? No way. The refs ruled thatthey had invented the rule before the sea¬son started and did not put it in writing,“like many other IM rules,” according toJohn Thomas. There will be no joy in Dud¬ley, mighty Rosie has messed up.Ask Mad Dog and the Wacks how happythey were to show up for a game and findout that not only was the game changed,but they already lost it by forfeit.I always thought officials were supposedto facilitate the game, not whistle it todeath. The best official is an unnoticed one(not a dead one, contrary to opinion). Call¬ing every picayune sub-rule gets very te¬dious. Maybe the rules should be rewrit¬ten. As an official, I always tried to keepcontrol of the game while letting the par¬ticipants play. This is not the NFL or theNBA, and nobody here is Mendy Ru¬dolph.When you were a kid and played ball inyour back yard, did you have Mom comeout and call penalties? Did you call Dad adirty zebra and a striped scum of theearth? It just wasn’t necessary. So what isit that enables 10 year olds to do what 20years olds (and up) can’t do? Has all oursophistication and intellectualism made usunfit to compromise in the capacity of achild? Losing is one thing, but gettingchumped is another. While officials don’tplay an active role in the outcome of anygame, don’t think that they don’t give ortake away points.It is acknowledged that all officials areout there trying their best. With basketballcoming up, though, let’s hope all officialsare made aware of any glaring changes inIM rules. In addition to a rules meeting, alecture on the Philosophy of Officiatingwould be helpful. You’ll find that underPhilosophy 274 in the Time Schedules,right under Philosophy 272, The Logic ofIrrationality. however, is the first time this season, thatChicago has been blanked in an away game.Wheaton proved to be one of the strongestopponents that the Maroons have on theirschedule, as well as one of the best teams inthe Midwest. In 1978 qualified they finishedfor the WCAA Division II playoffs. Theydominated the game rather thoroughly andseemed to be the better team. They movedthe ball quite well and had numerous scor¬ing opportunities. The Maroon defense didwell to hold them to three goals. The firstgoal was scored on Maroon goalie John Con-das, who played approximately sixtyminutes. Dave Eubanks replaced Condas for the remaining thirty minutes of the finalgame and surrendered the last two goals.The Maroon offense never really got un¬tracked which had been one of the teamsprimary problems throughout the season.They had some scoring chances but couldnot mount a consistent attack and put littlesustained pressure on the Wheaton goalie.The team ends the season with a 4-6-1record overall and a 3-1-1 mark in theMidwest conference which was good enoughfor second place behind Lake Forest in theNorthern Division Barry De Silva’s teamwill start their winter training soon and tryto regroup for the spring schedule.IM reportRes. finals setBy Mark Erwinand Andy RothmanThe first week of the Intramural Foot¬ball playoffs is almost behind us, and theseventeen teams that made it to theplayoffs have been narrowed down toseven (as of Thursday morning). These in¬clude four graduate teams, who squaredoff yesterday afternoon, but whose resultswere not available at presstime. Three Un¬dergraduate teams remain as well. Theyare Tufts. Chamberlin, and Ed’s Bar andGrill. Tufts advanced to the Residencechampionship game by defeating Hender¬son 46-0 in the first round, and Michelson34-0 in the second round. They will faceChamberlin tomorrow at 12:00 or 12:30 forthe Residence championship, and the rightto meet Ed’s Bar and Grill, the Indepen¬dent League winner, for the Undergradu¬ate championship. Chamberlin got wherethey are by edging out Dudley 6-0, and thenbeating Lower Rickert 19-6.Dudley lodged a protest in their gameafter they were called for an illegal proce¬dure on punt formation and Chamberlinwas awarded an automatic first down.Dudley thought the call should have beenfive yards, which would not have beenenough for a first down, and play the downover. The IM rules state simply that thereis a penalty if three men are not on the line,which was the case, but not what the pen¬alty should be. The IM rules also state incases like this where further explanation isneeded, that “Standard football rules shallapply.” The “Standard” rules used by theIM department are in the Officials Manu¬al: Touch and flag Football, endorsed bythe National Intramural and RecreationalSports Association. These rules state, inRule 6 — Kicks, Section 1. Free Kicks, Ar¬ticle 2, that, “When the ball is legallykicked ... at least three players of the re¬ceiving team with 7 players . . . must bewithin five yards of their restraining lineafter the ball is ready for play and until theball is kicked. Penalty: 5 yards.” IM rulesmodify these to say that the three must beon the line of scrimmage, and, apparently, in their preseason meeting, the Officials’Supervisors added that the kicking teamwould get an automatic first down. Headsupervisor John Thomas’ only explanationfor w’hy the rule was not included in the IMrules was that, “We have many rules thatare not in writing.”In rejecting the protest, IM chief RosieResch said she was acting on the advice ofher advisors and special advisor, ChuckSchact, who said that the ruling wras con¬sistent with way the play was called duringthe season, which, officially, it appearsthat it was. An informal poll of officials,however, showed that five of seven of thetop rated officials, in addition to one of thethree supervisors, were either not awareof the rule or had it brought to their atten¬tion just before the playoffs started onMonday. Resch herself admitted that,“My supervisors do not have the right torewrite the rulebooks, if that has been thecase then they are obviously wrong.” ad¬ding that the rule may well be changed fornext year.The grad pairings include Psi U (40-25victors over Manifest Destiny) againstHung Jury, who got by The Pod. 13-7. Hoo¬ligans will face The Junkyard Dogs in theother semi-final match-up. The Dogsnotched the season’s biggest upset whenthey knocked off the Wabuno Bay Bucca¬neers 12-7 on Tuesday. The Bucs had beenthe University’s #l-ranked team through¬out the season.Football Top Ten(first place votes in parentheses)1. Psi U (6)2. Tufts (2)3. Junkyard Dogs (2)4. Wabuno Bay Buccaneers5. Hung Jury6. Hooligans7. Ed’s Bar & Grill8. Chamberlin9. Manifest Destiny10. The Pod 93898782686250422716Votes: Capitalists. Michelson. LowerRickert, Barristers. Dudley.ChamberlinTufts Residence ChampionEd's Bar and GrillIndependent Champion Undergraduate ChampionAll-University ChampionPsi UHung JuryHooligansJunkyard Dogs Graduate ChampionFriday, November 9, 1979 — The Chicago Maroon — 17Calendar25% OFF SALEGET ACQUAINTED SALE FOR U of CSTUDENTS AND FACULTYBrand name clothing such as H. FREE¬MAN, CHAPS, DONALD BROOKS, MAL¬COLM KENNETH, AQUASCUTUM, LONDON FOG, SERO and others at 25% off ofour very low listed prices.This is a special offer for U of C studentsand faculty only. This sale applies Mon -Fri from 3 PM - 6 PM and SAT from 10AM to 4 PM.Your U of C ID card is necessary for ad¬mission to this sale.Slight charge for other than basic alter¬ations.WILLIAM’S TRADITIONALCLOTHING19-S. LaSalle St. - 782-9885(Entrance on Arcade Place) m %FRIDAYPerspectives: Topic: “Aesthetics and Vietnam WarMovies” guests Robert Sugarman. Elaine Kaplan.Madonna McGrath, John Parker, and John Valien*tyne. 6:30 am. channel 7.Crossroads: English classes for foreign women,10:00 arn-noon.Italian Table: meets 10:00 noon at the Blue Gar¬goyle to speak Italian.Graduate Comm, on the Study of Women: “Womenin Print, Resources in the University of ChicagoLibrary” speaker Ruth Murray, 12:00 noon. IdaNoyes,Geophysical Sciences Colloquium: “Origin of Ar-chaen Granitic Rocks” speaker Gilbert Hanson, 1:30pm. Hinds Laboratory Auditorium.Center for Middle Eastern Studies: Arabic Circle,3:30 pm, Pick 218.Dent, of Biochemistry: “Role of the Cell SurfaceReceptor for Thrombin in Stimulation of Cell Divi¬sion” speaker Dennis Cunningham, 4:00 pm, Cum¬mings room 101.Hillel: Liberal - Progressive Sabbath Services. 5:00pm.Women’s Union: Meets 5:00 pm, in the Women’sUnion office above the Prog and Peach.Hillel: Orthodox (Yavneh) Sabbath Services, Sun¬down.UC Gymnastics Club: Instruction available between5:30-8:00 pm. Bartlett, free.Hillel: Adat Shalom Shabbat Dinner. 6:15 pm, $3,00.DOC Films: "An Unmarried Woman” 6:30. 9:00. and11:15 pm, Cobb.Law School Films: "Sherlock, Jr.” 7:00 and 9:30 pm,Law School Auditorium.Crossroads: Games night at Crossroads, 7:00-7 Ping-pong, Chinese checkers, Monopoly, etc.U of C Christian Fellowship: Meeting- “Communi¬ty” speaker Father John Hurley, 7:30 pm, Ida NoyesE. Lounge.SATURDAYHillel: Orthodox (Yavneh) Sabbath Services, 9:15am, Hillel.Hillel: Conservative-Egalitarian (the UpstairsMinyan) Sabbath Services, 9:30 am, Hillel.UC Gymnastics Club: Instruction available 2:00-5:00, Bartlett gym, free.Crossroads: Saturday dinner, 6:00 pm. $2.00 for agood home-cooked meal.DOC Films: “’Bread and Chocolate” 7:00 and 9:30pm, Cobb. Crossroads: Elections: American Style-5th wardalderman. Larry Bloom will chat informally abouthis own successful election campaign, city politicsin Chicago, and their relation to national politicalcampaigns. 7:15 pm.Hillel: Israeli Coffee House, food, drinks, enter¬tainment, 8:30 pm, Hillel.SUNDAYRockefeller Chapel: Ecumenical Service of HolyCommunion, 9:00 am.Rockefeller Chapel: Discussion Class: ’ The CivilReligion” speaker The Rev. Philip Blackwell. 10:00am.Hillel: Lox and Bagel Brunch, 11:00 am.Rockefeller Chapel: University Religious service:‘‘If the Eye Be Found. .Kenneth Leech. 11:00 am.Tai Chi Ch'uan Club: meets 7:30 pm, 4945 S. Dor¬chester (enter on 50th),Hillel: Lecture- “The Fugu Plan (The Untold Storyof The Japanese and The Jews During World War II)speaker Rabbi Marvin Tokayer, 7:30 pm.Folkdancers: Meet 8:00 pm. Ida Noyes Hall. In-termed... and Advanced.MONDAYPerspectives: Topic: “Medicaid in 1970’s” guestsStephen Davidson, Jeff Goldsmith, and Robert Ben¬nett 6:30 am, channel 7.Anthropology at Chicago; “Reflections on HumanNature: An Anthropologist’s Perspective” speakerHarvey Series, 4:00 pm. Social Sciences 122.Dept, of Chemistry: “Electron Transfer andMagnetic Exchange in Transition-Metal complexeswith Extended Bridging Groups” speaker Prof.David Hendrickson, 4:00 pm, Kent 103.UC Gymnastics Club: Instruction Available 5:30-8:00 pm, Bartlett gym. free.Students for a Libertarian Society; Businessmeeting: Delegate and Officer Elections, committeeformation. 7:00 pm. Ida Noyes East Lounge.Chess Club: Meets 7:00 pm. Ida Noyes MemorialRoom.Progressive Union: General meeting, 7:30 pm. IdaNoyes Hall.DOC Films: “ The Missing Juror” 7:30 pm. "PrivateHell 36“ 8:45 pm, Cobb.Cambodia Relief Now: U.C. Action Group firstmeeting 7:30 pm, I-House home room.Citizen's Party: Learn about the Citizen's Party 7:30pm, at the Union Church. 5600 Woodlawn.Folkdancers: Meets 8:00 pm, at Ida Noyes Hall.Beginners.0"Dm IMmhw (h Wee £oop•Come in to see our fine selec¬tion of Quality Brand-NameUniforms for Professional Menand Women•Coordinating Tops, Skirts, andPants as well as Dresses, Suits,Lab Coats, etc.•White Shoes - Clinic and Nursemates/Day lites!7 K. State -Bldg.- lift (Coo*18 — The Chicago Maroon — Friday, November 9, 1979> -,o'CLASSIFIED ADSAD RATESMaroon classifieds are effective andcheap. Place them in person at theMaroon business office in Ida NoyesHall by mail to the Maroon, Ida NoyesHall room 304, 1212 E. 59th St.,Chicago, 60637. All ads must be paid inadvance. Rates. 60' per line (30spaces) for U of C people, 75' per lineotherwise. $1 for special headline.Deadlines: For Tuesday paper, 12noon Friday; for Friday, 12 noonWednesday.Display advertising rates areavailable upon request. 753-3263.SPACEStudio for rent 12/1. University Park270/mo. 1 year lease security deposit.Call 752-6536.Avail. Nov. 15, bedroom of 3. 1154 E.56th (by Field House) $115 per monthfurnished. Women only. Call 643-2454.Avail asap-own room and use of studyin large 57th and Kenwood apt. Rent$200/month pret. grad, student. Call955-9351 btwn 4-7.Share one bedroom apt. 5480 Cornell.Call 643-1482 after 6p.m.Garage space needed. I need a place tostore my motorcycle for the winter.Call 324-1090 eves, or 753-2356 days.Leave mess. Ask for Mike.Co-op apt. for sale-3 rooms; sm. bdr.,separate Ivg. and dng. rms., kit¬chenette, bath. Good location. Safe,well-maintained bldg. Only $73/mo. in-cl. all taxes and heat and gas. ONLY20,000. Call Paula 753-2719, 752-4506.Ideal apt. for transferee, 10 month-2yr. condo sublet. Gracious living in2000 sq. ft. 3 bdrm., 2 bath, formal d.r.WBFP 947-0787 324-5116.Get a sun tan this winter! Sublet bigdeluxe sunny Studio at 5020 S. LakeShore, 12th floor, w-w carpet, quiet,lake view, safe in route of campus andcity bus. Has garage. Begin Dec. 1 orJan. 1. Only $270/mo! Call 363-2567/eve.Sublet 4 room apartment 1st floor com¬pletely furnished price negotiable.Phone BU8-0079 Jan.l - April 1.Nice furnished room good location forUniversity people. Non-smoker. Avail.Dec. 79. Call 955-7083.Large 1 bd. excellent condition. $350.493-3822Room at 1519 Harper avail Nov. 14.Rent $140, negotiable. Call Chris at955-5890.PEOPLE WANTEDThe Department of BehavioralSciences needs people who want toparticipate as paid subjects inpsycholinguistic and Cognitivepsychology experiments. For furtherinformation call 753-4718Chicago Sinai Congregation seeks afull time secretary (40 hrs.) for theRabbi. Excellent typing skills, someshorthand. Available December 1. CallMrs. Kailish 288 1600.Research laboratory on campus needsfulltime (40 hrs.) glassware washerand laboratory helper for period of sixto seven months, to start immediately.Rate: $4.65/hr. Meticulous work anddependability are required. Will train.Call 753-2706EASY EXTRA INCOME! $500/1000Stuffing envelopes-Guaranteed. Sendself-addressed, stamped envelope toDEXTER ENTERPRISES, 3039Shrine PI. LA, CA. 90007Make substantial extra income. SeeNov. Post mag. 12 pages on Amway.Married. Car. Work own flexible hrs.PT 667-4339 by 10p.m.Craft people wanted to sell their goodsat Student Activities Craft Fair, Dec. 4and 5 in Reynolds Club. Call x3598 orx3570 to reserve a space. Entry freefor students.Full time person to care for 9-monthold boy. Phone 493-7697 evenings andweekends, 947-6389 days.Faculty family seeks student part-time for help with light housekeeping.Flexible hours. Call Jean or Paul. 241-6766.SHOPPER NEEDED Groceries anderrands weekly. Car needed. Phone955-0541.Chicago Symphony student needs rideto Orchestra Hall Nov. 14. CallMichael. 753-2240*1306OVERSEAS JOBS-Summer/yearround. Europe, S. America, Australia, Asia, etc. All tields, $500-51,200 mon¬thly. Expenses paid. Sightseeing. Freeinfo. Write: IJC, Box 52-11, Corona DelMar. Ca. 92625.The Chicago Counseling andPsychotherapy Center, 5711 SouthWoodlawn and 6345 North Broadway,needs people who are willing to talkabout their personal problems andfeelings for 10 sessions with apsychotherapist-in-training. Par¬ticipation should not be seen aspsychotherapy or as a substitute forpsychotherapy, although participantsmay find it a useful experience. Par¬ticipants will neither be paid norcharged for their sessions. Call Pat at684-1800.FOR SALEGrateful Dead tickets $11.00 Dec. 3, 4,5. Call 947-9770. Row 25.HALF-FARE UNITED COUPONS forsale. Call 955-7472, except weekends.1975 Pontiac Astre excel, cond.,garage kept, only minor body damage,4 cyl. gas saver, stick shift, allprepared for the winter/snow tiresplus 2 extras. Must see! Asking$1200/negotiable. 363-2567/eve.United Vi fare coupon. $50.00. Call 684-4039 after 6.VW 73 Super Beetle, AM radio, newpaint, new tires, low mileage, veryclean, $1800 or best offer. 581-5513.American Airlines Half-Fare Ticketprice negotiable. 667-3260 evenings.PEOPLE FOR SALEARTWORK • posters, illustration,calligraphy, invitations, etc. NoelYuovovich, 5441 S. Kenwood 493-2399.Typing done on IBM by college trad.Pica type. Term papers, theses,dissertations, law briefs, manuscripts,resumes, letters, etc. Fast, accurate,reliable, reasonable. Near North Side.Call today 248-1478TYPING-PAPERS-Pick-up anddelivery on Campus. $1.00 per page.Please call 684-6882. (Horl.)Basic and intermediate Spanish con¬versation in small groups. $5.00 perperson. Call Patsy 752-8865 (nights) or762-5300 (days).Excellent, accurate typist with legalexperience will type papers anddissertations on IBM Selectric.Reasonable rates. 684-7414.PERSONALSWriters' Workshop Plaza 2-8377.PREGNANCY TEST SATURDAY 10-1. Augustana Church, 5500 W.Woodlawn. Bring 1st morning urinesample. $1.50 donation. SouthsideWomen's Health. 667-5505.DENNIS: I want everyone to knowwe're getting along. I like you, Cindy.SERVICESPRIME MOVERS: 1 or 2 men w/bigtruck: We'll move your soul (andpossessions) 324-1977.CONDO FOR SALEE. Hyde Pk. 2 bd., new kitchen, cpt.$42,500. 493-3822.NOTIMEFOR LOVE?Filled with gripes or wonderfully hap¬py stories of what it means to workwhile attending school? Maroonreporter writing series on studentswho work and needs to hear what youhave to say. Call Richard at 753-3265.UC HOTLINE753-1777From 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. there is a placeyou can call If you have a Question,need a Referral, or want to Talk - TheUC HOTLINE.SINGLESJEWISH SINGLESTHANKSGIVING:Wednesday, November 21, 1979 at 6:30p.m. for Jewish Single Adults, 25-45.Invited by CHUTZPAH UNLIMITED.Reservations required and limited. Nolater than November 17 at 12 noon.Hale House Presents:Itie ttyei Sarcticrstarring Clint EastwoodAction Adventure and Fantastic Scenery in theAmerican Southwest and The Swiss Alps.Saturday, November 10 • Admission $1.50Show Times: 7:00,9:15,11:15In Kent Auditorium Call Ed 324-3686 or Eleanor 248-2661,weekdays 7-10p.m., weekends 10am-5pm.CRAFT FAIRAttention Craft-people; the AnnualStudent Activities Crafts Fair will beon Dec. 4 and 5. Reserve a space nowto sell your goods. Call x3750 or x3598.Entry free to U.C. students.RUN FORYOUR LIFESALE . New Balance Waffle trainers.Used twice. $30 firm, size 6'/j men's.Call 955-4022 between 6 p.m. and 7p.m.or after 11p.m. Ask or Abbe.GIVE A DAMN!Cambodia relief. First meeting Nov.12 Mon. 7:30 1-House home room.Group forming now for concrete ac¬tion. Hunger hurts!MEMORY GAMESMEMORY GAMES! Have Fun Passing Tests! Save Time Studying torecall facts, definitions, concepts, for¬mulas, foreign languages, dramaticparts - Anything you must remember!Ask my Record-a-Call about low coststudy groups. 643-2826.ASINGULARGROUPOur Gallery of creative arts and craftsis now open Tues.-Fri. 11-2, Sat. 11-3and Sun. 11-1, located at the corner of57th and Woodlawn in the UnitarianChurch. We have a large selection ofjewelry, pottery, paintings, softsculpture, macrame, weaving,photography etc. Stop in and browse.BLACKFRIARSDon't be wishy-washy. Come seeYOU'RE A GOOD MAN, CHARLIEBROWN Nov. 16, 17, 18 at 8.00 p.m.with a matinee Nov. 17 at 2:00 p.m. IdaNoyes Cloister Club.WOMEN'SRAP GROUPWomen's Rap Group meets everyTuesday at 7:30 p.m. on the 3rd floor ofthe Blue Gargoyle. For info, call 752-5655.JEWISH SCHOOLSouth Side School of Jewish Studieswelcomes new families. Sunday schoolK-9. For info, call 752-5655 or 667-6329.WOMEN'SMAGAZINEPrimavera V is out! On sale in mostlocal bookstores. We need new staffmembers. Call 752-5655 for info.DOG SITTERA small friendly fun dog looking forpeople to stay with during Dec. break.Will pay. Mrs. Quinn, weekdays, Iv.message: 753-2507,LIBERTARIANSStudents For A Libertarian Society,Business meeting: Monday, Nov. 12,7';00 p.m., East Lounge, 2nd floor, IdaNoyes Hall. National Conventiondelegate and local officer elections,committee formation.The FLAMINGOand CABANA CLl'B5500 S. Shore Drive• Studio and 1 Bedroom• Furnished ami Unfurnished• U. of C. bus stop• Outdoor Pool and Gardens• Carpetin«: and Drapes Inel.• Security• University Subsidy forStudents and Staff• Delicatessen• Rarber Shop• Beaulv Shop• J.B.D. Restaurant• Dentist• ValetFREE PARKINGM.SnyderPL 2-3800 TANGO weekly meetings at Ida Noyes. Sundays at 8:00 Int-Adv. and Mondays at e>n » iin8 00 Beginners. All welcome. Lit A/V\r AwN tPoodle Tangoat "the funny papers"5238 S. Blackstone, Hyde Park Drinking champagnein a lightning stormin the "funny papers"KEYPUNCHINGFast, accurate keypunching. $10/hr.Verify possible. Call 753-2517 afts.FOLK DANCINGThe U of C Folkdancers have two SLEEP LABMale undergraduates, ages 17-22 need¬ed for sleep study. Payment will be$100.00 for sleeping three nights in laband completion of a variety of testsand questionnaires. Apply in person at5741 S. Drexel, Room 302, M r, 9-4. Nophone calls please. JELLYBEANJelly Bean promin “the funny papers"Sell it in the MaroonMaroon classifieds arecheap and effectivePlace them in person or by mailRates: 60cents per line(30 spaces) for U of C people75 cents for othersPayment must accompany adVERSAI1.EE5254 S. DorchesterWEEI. MAINTAINEDBUILDINGAttractive 1 '/z and• 2’/? Room StudiosFurnished or Unfurnished$192 - $291Based on AvailabilityAll Utilities IncludedAt Campus Bus Stop324-0200 Mrs. C»roak We GiveCASHFor UsedRecords1701 E. 55th684-3375Mallory’sFriday, November 9, 1979 — The Chicago Maroon — 19PART-TIME JOBSON CAMPUSEARN *5 PER HOUR-If you're looking for an unusual job opportunity for thisfall and for the rest of the school year, The University ofChicago Alumni Telefund needs your help.We are now contacting thousands of Chicago alumni bytelephone for their gifts to the University. The programwill run through the entire school year.Weil pay you $5 an hour. Phoning hours run from 6:00p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday and from 9:30a.m. - 1:00 p.m. on Saturday. We require you to work 2sessions per week.You'll be working as an Alumni Telefund Associate. Theseare people who have a mature presentation and can talkabout the University and its needs. We ll teach you therest. Seniors and graduate students are among thosemost eligible.APPLY NOW!Call Gregory Volk at 753-0888 for a prompt interview orstop by in Cobb Hall (B23).THE CHICAGOALUMNI TELEFUND The WomanTaken inAdultery & The‘ Translated byGabriele AnnanWith an Introduction byEric HellerThe UniversityofChicago PressChicago 60637 yI <?;3 * 5,6 1 B 3 II oca RAO PRO CAST* ^j IxTy! '■rTI 'CTO) 'rcl! n HEWLETTPACKARDThere's no reason to headback to school with less helpthan you could be getting.Especially when Hewlett-Packard has come up with theirSeries E calculators — a fullline of professional scientificand business calculators de¬signed for a students needsand budget.With Series E you get: HP s unique RPN logic system,large, bright display, commas to separate thousands,built-in diagnostic systems to help you catch andcorrect errors, improved algorithms for extra accur¬acy, low battery warning light, rechargeable bat¬teries, positive click keys, and more.HP makes professional calculatorsstudents can afford. SALESAVINGS from $4.50 to $1 55.00Regular SaleHP31E $ 50.00 $ 46.50HP32E $ 70.00 $ 63.00HP33E $ 90.00 $ 78.75HP37E $ 75.00 $ 66.75HP38E $120.00 $105.00HP67 $375.00 $295.00HP97 $750.00 $595.00FREE with a purchase of any Hewlett-Packard calculator,a HP vinyl folder value at $4.95or a HP T-Shirt value at $6.95SALE RUNSNOV. 9 to DEC. 91979We accept Visaand Master Charge